In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori to Metronidazole, Amoxicillin, Tetracycline and Ciprofloxacin in Iran
Amir Masoud Jafari,
Farhad Nasiri Afshar,
Mohamad Javad Soltanpoor,
Mahboobeh Sadat Hosseini
A cross-sectional study was carried out at the endoscopy unit of Bagqiyatollah University of Tehran. From February 2004 to June 2006, 305 consecutive dyspeptic patients were evaluated. With regard to standard methods, biopsies were taken and cultured. For each isolates Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for Metronidazole (MTZ), Amoxicillin (AMX), Tetracycline (TC) and Ciprofloxacin (CIP) were determined by Epsilometer test. Considering standard resistance breakpoints, our data was analyzed and resistance rates were reported. One hundred forty nine patients, had a positive culture. The resistance rate in H.P. isolates were as follows: MTZ (60.4%), CIP (40.3%), AMX (15.4%) and TC (10.7%). 82.6% of isolates were resistance to at least one drug. In resistance group: 56, 39 and 5% of isolates displayed single, dual and triple drug resistant pattern, respectively. In the different age groups or sex groups there was no difference (p>0.1) in the antibiotics resistance rates except for TC (p = 0.01) which was more common in older groups (17.1% versus 4.1%). In present study we confronted with markedly high rate of resistance to metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, furthermore other antibiotics displayed significant resistance rate and there was some level of overlap between resistances to these drugs. It seems that in Iran HP eradication is more difficult and demand more concern.
to cite this article:
Hossein Khedmat, Mohsen Amini, Amir Masoud Jafari, Farhad Nasiri Afshar, Mohamad Javad Soltanpoor, Farahnaz Fallahian, Morteza Izadi and Mahboobeh Sadat Hosseini, 2007. In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori to Metronidazole, Amoxicillin, Tetracycline and Ciprofloxacin in Iran. Research Journal of Microbiology, 2: 947-953.
Helicobacter pylori (HP) is one of the most common bacterial infections
affecting nearly half of the worlds population. It is very common in developing
counties like Iran, in which HP infection prevalence reaches to almost 60% of
general population (Amini, 2005; Go, 2002) has been implicated as a predisposing
factor in chronic active gastritis, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, gastric cancer
and gastriclymphoma (Suerbaum and Michetti, 2002). Thus its eradication is an
important issue, but the resistant strains has been emerged in most part of
the world, especially in countries like Iran (Frenck and Clemens, 2003; Malekzadeh
et al., 2004). There is a great diversity in rate and type of this resistance
with regard to geographical location and time of the study (Amini, 2005). Its
appearing that the optimal regimens vary for each geographic region; clarithromycin,
metronidazole, amoxicillin, bismuth and omeprazole are the most effective drugs
in western countries, while they are seemed less effective in Iran. At the present
moment, there is an anarchism in introduction of practical HP eradication regimens
in Iran (Amini et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2004). Therefore
we must consider trial of other new drugs and revolutionize our knowledge about
routine drugs in domain of HP eradication. Recent studies imply on effectiveness
of fluoroqiunolons like ciprofloxacin in this domain (Amini et al., 2005;
Turel et al., 1998; Boyanova et al., 2000; Falsafi et al.,
2004), furthermore in two recent clinical trials in Iran, researchers found
that eradication rate of ciprofloxacin is comparable to an introduced effective
but not practical drug in Iran, i.e., furazolidone (high rate of side effects)
(Amini et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2004). Moreover the body
of our knowledge about fluoroqiunolons in Iran is still not adequate; therefore
an in vitro study perform to evaluate the resistance pattern of HP to
routine drugs such as metronidazole, amoxicillin and tetracycline and new drugs
like ciprofloxacin to help to introduce new regimens in HP eradication field
in countries with high metronidazole resistance rate (Fakheri et al.,
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a cross sectional study, from February 2004 to June 2006, in
which 305 consecutive dyspeptic patients (with regard to definition of dyspepsia
in Rome II criteria) were evaluated at the endoscopy unit of Bagqiyatollah University
of Tehran, one of the major referral centers in Iran.
During each endoscopy, two biopsy specimens were obtained, the first from
the antral mucosa of the gastric greater curvature within approximately 5 cm
from the pylorus and the second from corporal mucosa near gastric angula. Then
the specimens were placed into Cystein albimi broth with 20% glycerol as a transport
media, they were rapidly labeled, then frozen at 70 centigrade and transported
to the laboratory in dry ice. All specimens were processed within 2 h in the
laboratory we let all the specimens melt in room temperature.
The biopsy specimens were minced and homogenized in physiological sterile
saline (0.5 mL) and plated immediately on chocolate agar media (Columbia agar
+ 5% Sheep blood). The plates were then incubated for three days at 37°C
in a microaerophilic atmosphere (9% CO2, 11% O2, 80% N2
and 98% humidity). All the negative plates were kept for 14 days at the previous
mentioned condition. All the transparent colonies with 1-2 mm diameters were
identified by gram staining, catalase and urease tests. After identification
by these conventional methods, all the positive colonies of one plate were touched
by a cotton swab and were transported into 1 mL Brucella Broth media. The density
of all suspensions were reached to Mc Farland Standard No. 4 Opacity (108
cfu mL-1). A specimen was caught from each suspension to evaluate
motility and morphology of bacteria by phase contrast microscopy. In the case
of observing more than 25% immotile sticky bacteria or spherical forms we discarded
the suspension and repeated the process of making the suspension. All the suspensions
satisfied our previous mentioned criteria were inoculated by flooding and aspiration
on to a chocolate agar media (Columbia agar + 5% Sheep blood). All the plates
were let to dry at room temperature in 5-10 min.
For each isolates MICS for MET, AMX, TET and CIP were determined by a gradient
diffusion method (Epsilometer test, E-test, AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). We put
E-test strips on the surface of plates in sterile condition. Quality control
was ensured by using organisms from the American Type Culture Collection, including
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 85327, Staphylococcus aurous ATCC
29213, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and HP ATCC 26695, which were cultured
under same pervious mentioned condition.
|| MIC* values for definition of susceptibly status to antibiotics
for Helicobacter pylori eradication
|*: MIC = Minimal Inhibitory Concentration
MICs were read as the nearest concentration to intersect point of bacteria
growth. Susceptibilities and resistances were reported with regard to reference
values. (Boyanova et al., 2000; King et al., 2000; Ge et al.,
2002; Shara et al., 2002) (Table 1).
We used SPSS for Windows 11.5 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illios) for reporting
frequencies and means, Standard Error (SE) and analyzing our data by chi square
and independent student t-test. Confidence Interval (CI) for every resistance
frequency was calculated as: First, calculate the three quantities A = 2r +
z2; B = z √[z2 + 4r (1 - r/n)] and C = 2 (n + z2).
Then, the confidence interval for the proportion is given by (A - B)/C to (A
+ B)/C and z is 196 for a 95% CI (Newcombe et al., 2002). A p-value <0.05
was considered statistically significant and all p-values were calculated two-sided.
We must mention that for preparing the suspension solution we used colonies which were 4 days old or younger and all the colonies which were harvested from the primary plate beyond 4 days, were re-cultured to produce younger isolates for susceptibility testing. The Institutional Review Board of Bagqiyatollah University of Tehran approved and financed this study.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From three hundred and five consecutive dyspeptic patients, 149 patients who didnt mention any history of H.P eradication therapy, (48.8%) had a positive culture (61.1% male and 38.9% female, mean age (SE): 38.17 (1.07) years). The study population comprised all the isolates harvested from these 149 patients. These isolates evaluated under antibiogram test; overall results of antibiogram test are shown in Table 2.
By considering the intermediate group as susceptible group in the case of MET, we can say that 123 (82.6%, 95% CI 75.66-87.80%) strains from our study population were drug resistant. Of resistance group, 69 isolates (56%, 95% CI 47.27-64.55%) displayed single-drug resistant pattern from them, 40 isolates (58%, 95% CI 46.21-68.89%) were resistant to MET, 9 isolates (13%, 95% CI 7.02-22.97%) to AMOX, 18 isolates (26.1%, 95% CI 17.19-37.51%) to CIP and 2 isolates (2.9%, 95% CI 0.79-9.97%) to TET. Fifty four isolates (44%, 95% CI 35.45-52.73%) displayed more than one drug resistant pattern; In this group 48 isolates (88.9%, 95% CI 77.86-94.81%) displayed dual-drug resistant pattern, by considering this group we can say that, 29 isolates (60.4%, 95% CI 46.31-72.98%) were resistant to CIP-MET, 7 isolates (14.6%, 95% CI 7.25-27.17%) to CIP-TET, 4 isolates (8.3%, 95% CI 3.29-19.55%) to MET-AMOX, 4 isolates (8.3%, 95% CI 3.29-19.55%) to CIP-AMOX, 3 isolates (6.3%4, 95% CI 2.15-16.84%) to MET-TET and 1 isolates (2.1%, 95% CI 0.37-10.90%)to TET-AMOX).finally 6 isolates (11.1%, 95% CI 5.19-22.19%) displayed triple-drug resistant pattern, from this group, three isolates were resistant to MET-CIP-AMOX, two isolates to TET-CIP-AMOX, one isolates to MET-CIP-TET) and no isolates displayed quadruple-drug resistant pattern. We found out there was no statistically meaningful relationship between resistance to four studied antibiotics and patient's age and sex (Table 3).
|| Percentage frequency of Helicobacter pylori susceptibly
to the studied antibiotics
|*: CI = Confidence Interval
|| Background variables in a hospital-based cross-sectional
in vitro study of Helicobacter pylori resistance
|*: p-values were calculated by unadjusted analysis, :
NS = not significant; SD = standard deviation
Metronidazole resistance have been emerging world wide and susceptibility to this agent is a major corner stone in therapeutic regimens efficacy and therefore in HP eradication failures around the world, the aim for initial eradication rates should be 85 to 95% in first line HP eradication therapy, with respect to this, Megraud has emphasis that in the case of resistance rate <30% to metronidazole, these agent could be used in therapeutic regimens with out in vitro susceptibly testing of HP (Megraud et al., 1998).
The present results and other similar studies in Iran demonstrate primary H.P. resistance to metronidazole is markedly upper than this limit and exceed 50% (Malekzadeh et al., 2004; Siavoshi et al., 2002) these evidence implies that without usage in vitro susceptibly testing of HP there is a necessity of moving this drug from first line to further lines of therapy.
Present study and similar studies display low number of resistant isolates to amoxicillin and tetracycline, although the rate of resistance to amoxicillin and tetracycline is higher than other developed countries but this deference is not enough to pose any changes on their efficacy in a country with a high Metronidazole resistance rate like Iran and this fact signifying the importance of consideration of them in H.P. eradication regimens (Siavoshi et al., 2000; Malekzadeh et al., 2004; Shara et al., 2002; King et al., 2000).
Furthermore we found zero resistance rates with quadruple pattern and this fact is parallel with studies which insist on usage of quadruple regimens in Iran (Malekzadeh et al., 2004). In present in vitro study we confront with a same significant level of resistance to ciprofloxacin as metronidazole but interestingly in our earlier clinical trial study we found that, a composition of ciprofloxacin with a bismuth salt and proton pump inhibitor has an efficacy like furazolidone, which in other recent studies presented as effective as claritromycin which is still effective and powerful drug in HP eradication in countries like Iran (Amini et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2004; Fakher et al., 2001; Falsafi et al., 2004; Asaka et al., 2001) by considering this obvious discrepancy with regard to recent evidences that support usage of fluoroqinulons in HP eradication (Amini et al., 2005; Boyanova et al., 2000; Fujimura et al., 2004; Di Caro et al., 2002) and knowledge that, there is a poor correlation between clinical outcome and in vitro susceptibility results in HP eradication domain, (Gisbert et al., 2002) we can postulated that ciprofloxacin (and may be other fluoroqiunolons) susceptibility judged by the E-test may not always predict the treatment outcome.
As for metronidazole, there may be a discrepancy between the E-test and the agar dilution method (Hachem et al., 1996; Osato et al., 2001). As for clarithromycin, the results of susceptibility obtained by the culture method may be different from those obtained by the Polymerase Chain Reaction method (Masaoka et al., 2004).
Furthermore we know that addition of Bismuth salt and omeprazole to antibiotics may be lead to achievement of higher eradication rate (Masuda et al., 2003; Saberi et al., 1995), may be this mechanism lead to display of higher eradication rate in our clinical trial than present study, Further more existence of discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro studies is in concordance with other evidences that questioned the true role of culture for HP management in clinical practice (Lee et al., 1999; Gisbert et al., 1999; Zullo et al., 2001) Indeed, in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity does not lead necessarily to eradication in vivo and vice versa (Zullo et al., 2003), with regard to these facts we suggest basing HP eradication regimens on in vivo clinical trials which were coupled with in vitro studies.
In conclusion we can say that in this study we confronted with markedly high rate of resistance to Metronidazole and Ciprofloxacin, furthermore other antibiotics displayed significant resistance rate and there was a some level of overlap between resistance to these drugs; these findings were in concordance with theory that HP in countries like Iran copying the same behavior of tuberculosis to eradication regimens, in addition to this we found that, like tuberculosis, for evaluation of HP resistance to at least fluoroqinulons like Ciprofloxacin we must rely on in vivo than in vitro studies, thus authors of this article suggest that maybe like tuberculosis in countries with high resistance rate to metronidazole such as Iran, we must more than other developed countries persist on strict usage of HP eradication drugs by considering the recommended regimens and stratification of our drugs to first, second and more lines of treatment and this must be presented according to parallel in vivo and in vitro studies.
Amini, M., H. Khedmat and F. Yari, 2005.
Eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori
in dyspeptic patients. Med. Sci. Monit., 11: CR193-CR195.Direct Link |
Asaka, M., T. Sugiyama, M. Kato, K. Satoh and H. Kuwayama et al
Multicenter, double-blind study on triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori
in Japanese peptic ulcer patients. Helicobacter, 6: 254-261.Direct Link |
Boyanova, L., I. Stancheva, Z. Spassova, N. Katzarov, I. Mitov and R. Koumanova, 2000.
Primary and combined resistance to four antimicrobial agents in Helicobacter pylori
in Sofia, Bulgaria. J. Med. Microbiol., 49: 415-418.Direct Link |
Di Caro, S., M. Assunta Zocco, F. Cremonini, M. Candelli and E.C. Nista et al
., 2002 2002.
Levofloxacin based regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori
. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 14: 1309-1312.Direct Link |
Fakheri, H., R. Malekzadeh, S. Merat, M. Khatibian, A. Fazel, B.Z. Alizadeh and S. Massarrat, 2001.
Clarithromycin vs. furazolidone in quadruple therapy regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori
in a population with a high metronidazole resistance rate. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 15: 411-416.Direct Link |
Falsafi, T., F. Mobasheri, F. Nariman and M. Najafi, 2004.
Susceptibilities to different antibiotics of Helicobacter pylori
strains isolated from patients at the pediatric medical center of Tehran Iran. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42: 387-389.Direct Link |
Frenck, Jr., R.W. and J. Clemens, 2003.
Helicobacter in the developing world. Microbes Infect., 5: 705-713.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Fujimura, S., S. Kato, K. Iinuma and A. Watanabe, 2004. In vitro
activity of fluoroquinolone and the gyrA gene mutation in Helicobacter pylori
strains isolated from children. J. Med. Microbiol., 53: 1019-1022.Direct Link |
Ge, B., S. Bodeis, R.D. Walker, D.G. White and S. Zhao et al
Comparison of the Etest and agar dilution for in vitro
antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter
. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 50: 487-494.Direct Link |
Gisbert, J.P., J.L. Gisbert, S. Marcos, R. Garcia Gravalos, D. Carpio and J.M. Pjares, 1999.
Seven-day rescue therapy after Helicobacter pylori
treatment failure: Omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 13: 1311-1316.Direct Link |
Gisbert, J.P. and J.M. Pajares, 2002. Helicobacter pylori
'rescue' regimen when proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies fai. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 16: 1047-1057.Direct Link |
Go, M.F., 2002.
Natural history and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori
infection. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 16: 3-15.Direct Link |
Hachem, C.Y., J.E. Clarridge, R. Reddy, R. Flamm, D.G. Evans and S.K. Tanaka et al
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori
. Comparison of E-test, broth microdilution and disk diffusion for ampicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 24: 37-41.Direct Link |
King, A., 2000.
Recommendation for susceptibility testing on fastidious organisms and those requiring special handling. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 48: 77-80.Direct Link |
Lee, J.M., N.P. Breselin, D.K. Hyde, M.J. Buckley and O.C.A. Morain, 1999.
Treatment options for Helicobacter pylori
infection when proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy fails in clinical practice. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 13: 489-496.Direct Link |
Malekzadeh, R., M. Mohamadnejad and F. Siavosh, 2004.
Treatment of Helicobacter pylori
infection in IRAN: Low efficacy of recommended western regimens. Arch. Iran. Med., 7: 1-8.
Masaoka, T., H. Suzuki, K. Kurabayashi, A.G. Kamiya and H. Ishii, 2004.
Second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori
infection after dilution agar methods and PCR-RFLP analysis. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 20: 68-73.Direct Link |
Masuda, H., T. Hiyama, M. Yoshihara, S. Tanaka, F. Shimamoto and K. Haruma et al
Necessity of multiple gastric biopsies from different sites for detection of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori
strains. Scand J. Gastroenterol., 38: 942-946.Direct Link |
Megraud, F., 1998.
Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori
Infection. Br. Med. Bull., 4: 207-216.Direct Link |
Newcombe, R.G., 2000.
Statistical applications in orthodontics. Part II. Confidence intervals for proportions and their differences. J. Orthodontics, 27: 339-340.Direct Link |
Osato, M.S., R. Reddy, S.G. Reddy, R.L. Penland and D.Y. Graham, 2001.
Comparison of the E test and the NCCLS-approved agar dilution method to detect metronidazole and clarithromycin resistant Helicobacter pylori
. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 17: 39-44.Direct Link |
Saberi-Firoozi, M., S. Massarrat, S. Zare, M. Fattahi, A. Javan, H. Etaati and N. Dehbashi, 1995.
Effect of triple therapy or amoxycillin plus omeprazole or amoxycillin plus tinidazole plus omeprazole on duodenal ulcer healing, eradication of Helicobacter pylori
and prevention of ulcer relapse over a 1-year follow-up period: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 90: 1419-1423.PubMed |
Shara, A.I., M. Chedid, G.F. Araj, K.A. Barada and F.H. Mourad, 2002.
Prevalence of Hlicobacter pylori
resistance to etronidazole, clathriomycin, amoxicillin and tetracycline in Lebanon. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 19: 155-158.PubMed | Direct Link |
Siavoshi, F., A.H. Pourkhajeh, S. Merat, H. Asl-Soleimani, E. Heydarian, M. Khatibian and R. Malekzadeh, 2000.
Susceptibility of various strains of Helicobacter pylori
to selected agents. Arch. Iran. Med., 3: 60-63.Direct Link |
Suerbaum, S. and P. Michetti, 2002. Helicobacter pylori
infections. New Engl. J. Med., 347: 1175-1186.Direct Link |
Turel, I., L. Goli, P. Bukovec and M. Gubina, 1998.
Antibacterial tests of Bismuth (III)-Quinolone (Ciprofloxacin, cf) compounds against Helicobacter pylori
and some other bacteria. Crystal structure of (cfH 2) 2 (Bi 2 Cl 10) 4H2
O. J. Inorgan. Biochem., 71: 53-60.Direct Link |
Zullo, A., C. Hassan, C. Campo, R. Lorenzetti, I. Febbraro and M. De-Matthaeis et al
A therapy regimen after failed Helicobacter pylori
treatments. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther., 15: 1193-1197.Direct Link |
Zullo, A., C. Hassan, V. De-Francesco, R. Lorenzetti and M.I. Marignan et al
A third-line levofloxacin-based resuce therapy for Helicobacter pylori
eradication. Digest. Liver Dis., 35: 232-236.Direct Link |