Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

IS6110 Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Northwest of Iran



Mohammad Asgharzadeh, Saber Yousefee, Mohammad Reza Nahaei, Mohammad Taghi Akhi, Khalil Ansarian and Hossein Samadi Kafil
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

IS6110-based DNA fingerprinting is currently the most widely used genetic marker for differentiating among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. To evaluate the DNA polymorphism among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and to determine if there is matching of IS6110 fingerprints representing recent transmission of tuberculosis. Totally one hundred and sixty five isolates of M. tuberculosis (53 from West Azarbaijan and 112 from East Azarbaijan) were analyzed by IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. Isolates having identical RFLP patterns were considered a cluster. The average number of IS6110 copies per strain was 7.3 and ranged from 0 to 17 among the M. tuberculosis isolates. The IS6110-DNA patterns from these isolates were highly polymorphic. In conclusion 123 patterns were observed which 16 patterns were shared by 47 isolates (30.52%). Most strains (93.62%) had multicopy patterns and only 3 of clustered isolates had less than six IS6110 copies. In our study increased clustering was observed with isolates from male patients. RFLP analysis of 154 isolates of M. tuberculosis showed a considerable diversity, suggesting that most patients were infected with unique strains, probably resulted from reactivation of the latent infection.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Mohammad Asgharzadeh, Saber Yousefee, Mohammad Reza Nahaei, Mohammad Taghi Akhi, Khalil Ansarian and Hossein Samadi Kafil, 2007. IS6110 Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Northwest of Iran. Research Journal of Microbiology, 2: 940-946.

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jm.2007.940.946

INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the most harmful human pathogens worldwide, causing about 8 million new tuberculosis cases and 2-3 million deaths yearly (de Boer et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2007). Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major health problem worldwide, but it is more prevalent in underdeveloped and developing countries, in which over 95% of cases occur (Vukovié et al., 2003).

It is estimated that between 19-43% of the world’s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but a few (5-10%) will develop active TB (ATS, 2000; Malik and Godfrey-Faussett, 2005). The key for controlling the spread of tuberculosis include proper case finding, rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and prompt initiation of effective chemotherapy (Farnia et al., 2001; Asgharzadeh et al., 2007). It was estimated by conventional epidemiologic methods that 90% of the active cases of tuberculosis in developed countries resulted from reactivation during adulthood of an infection contracted years before and that recently transmitted disease had a minor role (Gutiérrez et al., 1998). The typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is important for case tracing, distinguishing between relapse and reinfection by an exogenous strain and identifying nosocomial, institutional and community outbreaks (Durmaz et al., 2003). DNA fingerprinting using the insertion sequence IS6110 as a probe, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism, has become the standard technique for the comparison of M. tuberculosis isolates on the strain level (Niemann et al., 2000; Kam et al., 1999; Braden et al., 1997).

It is generally assumed that the level of clustering among M. tuberculosis isolates from a certain region is associated with the level of recent transmission. On the contrary, non-clustered cases are considered to indicate TB resulting from reactivation of latent infection (Vukovié et al., 2003). Patients with TB whose isolates cannot be grouped into clusters, i.e., those with unique DNA fingerprints, are assumed to have disease that results from the reactivation of latent infection acquired in the past (Murray, 2002). Finally IS6110 fingerprinting can be applied to confirm recent transmission of tuberculosis in a linked population or laboratory cross-contamination (de Boer et al., 2002).

In the present study, we have investigated DNA polymorphism and epidemiological relationships among M. tuberculosis strains isolated from tuberculosis patients residing in Northwest (East and West Azarbaijan) of Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial Strains
All isolates of M. tuberculosis were collected from patients who referred to central TB laboratory of Orumieh and Tabriz Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Centers from March 2004 to March 2005. Finally the RFLP patterns of 165 M. tuberculosis isolates (53 from West Azarbaijan and 112 from East Azarbaijan) were determined. The isolates were identified as M. tuberculosis by standard biochemical tests, including production of niacin, catalase activity, nitrate reduction, pigment production and growth rate (Asgharzadeh et al., 2006).

IS6110- RFLP

Extraction of DNA from M. tuberculosis isolates were performed by the standard protocol described by Van Soolingen et al. (994). The IS6110 probe was prepared by digoxigenin labeling of 245 bp amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Briefly, the oligonucleotides INS-1 (5´CGT GAG GGC ATC GAG GTG GC) and INS-2 (5´ GCG TAG GCG TCG GTG ACA AA) [Tib-Molbiol, Germany] were used to amplify a 245 bp fragment from purified chromosomal M. bovis BCG DNA by PCR (van Embden et al., 1993). This fragment was purified and after solubilization, the DNA was labeled.

DNA fingerprinting was performed as described by van Soolingen et al. (1994) and van Embden et al. (1993). The extracted mycobacterial DNA was digested with PvuII enzyme (Cinagen, Iran) and restriction fragments were separated in 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis at 20 V for 18 h. Then, the fragments were transferred, from the gels to positively charged nylon membranes.

Hybridization was performed by using a 245 bp probe of insertion sequence IS6110 and detected by colorimetric system. A mixture of PvuII-digested supercoiled DNA ladder (Sigma, USA) and HaeIII-digested φX174 DNA (Fermentas, Lithuania) was used as an internal marker. The internal marker was added to the wells together with the cleaved M. tuberculosis DNA and visualized by reprobing the blots with DIG DNA labeling and detection kit (Roche, Germany). In addition to internal size marker, PvuII-digested genomic DNA of reference strain M.t1 4323 was used in each southern blot experiment as an external size marker. RFLP patterns of the isolates were compared by visual examination (van Soolingen et al., 1994). A cluster was defined as a group of two or more isolates from different patients whose RFLP fingerprints were identical with respect to both the number and molecular size of all bands (Asgharzadeh et al., 2006, 2007).

Statistical Analysis
All patients included were classified into two groups, clustered and non-clustered. Categorical data were compared by Chi-square test (or Fishers exact test). p-values below 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

From March 2004 to March 2005, one hundred and sixty five culture-confirmed cases of TB were subjected to IS6110-RFLP analyses, that 89 (53.94%) were isolated from male patients and 76 (46.06%) belonged to female ones. The age of patients ranged from 2.5 to 88 years.

As shown in Fig. 1, RFLP typing revealed a variable numbers of hybridizing bands that ranged from 0-17, with the majority of strains (93.3%) having at least five copies. The average copy number of IS6110 per strain was 7.3. Only 11(6.7%) isolates had less than five IS6110 copies: One isolates had four, one isolates had two and one isolates contained a single copy of IS6110 element, 8 isolates showed no copies of IS6110 element. RFLP analysis was performed on 154 isolates that contained five or more copies of IS6110 (Fig. 2). The two similar RFLP patterns showed in number 1 and 2 samples of Fig. 1.

Image for - IS6110 Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Northwest of Iran
Fig. 1: Restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained by IS6110 probe. Lane 1-12 RFLP patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, St: RFLP pattern of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reference strain (M.t1 4323).

Image for - IS6110 Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Northwest of Iran
Fig. 2: No. of IS6110 elements in M. tuberculosis isolate from East and West Azarbaijan provinces of Iran

Table 1: Risk factors for clustering of tuberculosis in East and West Azarbaijan provinces of Iran
Image for - IS6110 Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from Northwest of Iran

Among these isolates analyzed 123 different patterns were observed, 16 of these were shared by two or more patient's isolates and were detected in 47 strains (clustered isolates). The remaining 107 patterns were found only once (unique isolates). During the study period we identified two isolates from Nakhichevan-born TB patients, but they didn’t share in clustering.

The clustered isolates comprised 30.52% of the total isolates and they formed 16 clustered consisting of 2 to 10 cases each. 69.48% of patients had a unique RFLP patterns. Although cases among male patients were more clustered (51.9%) than cases among female patients (48.1%), this was not significant (p>0.05). In this study patients with 56 or older age were strongly associated with clustering (59.6%), patients within this age group belonged to cluster more frequently than younger patients (p<0.05). Other risk factors associated with recent transmission of tuberculosis in clustered patients in comparison to non-clustered patients are shown in Table 1.

RFLP analysis confirmed the suspicion of laboratory cross contamination for two strains isolated in Orumieh central TB laboratory. One of these isolates was smear negative and had been processed with a smear positive isolate at the same time. We didn’t find any contact tracing or epidemiological link between those patients.

DISCUSSION

The discovery of repetitive DNA elements in M. tuberculosis complex strains and the establishment of DNA fingerprinting techniques for M. tuberculosis with different genetic markers, especially with the IS6110 probe, have made it possible to study the epidemiology of TB at the molecular level and to detect the infectious source of the disease on the basis of clonal differentiation of M. tuberculosis isolates (Yang et al., 1994). Of one hundred and sixty isolates in this study, 11 (6.7%) isolates showed fewer than 5 copies of IS6110, but Farina et al. (2000) have reported that 5.4% of their isolates from Tehran had low banding patterns and 3.2% of isolates from Fars province had low copies of IS6110 (Doroudchi et al., 2000). Only 8 isolates did not contain the IS6110 element. Zero-copy strains have previously been described with slightly higher frequencies in patients from Vietnam, China, Thailand and India (Rasolofo-Razanamparany et al., 2001). Present findings reinforced the hypothesis of van Soolingen et al. (1995) that certain genotypes of M. tuberculosis are associated with particular geographic region.

A majority of isolates from patients of East and West Azarbaijan exhibited unique RFLP patterns and only 30.52% of the patients were clustered in 16 clusters, suggesting that recent transmission accounted for 20.13% of the tuberculosis. Clustered isolates (30.52%) observed in our study is lower than that of Tehran (43%), the capital of the country (Farnia et al., 2004). The reason for differences found in clustering rates in other investigations may be the strict cluster definition of this study. The percentage of clustered isolates of 30.52% observed in our study is comparable with that described for other cities e.g., Paris (approximately 36%) (Gutiérrez et al., 1998) or New York (approximately 37%) (Alland et al., 1994), however it is remarkably lower than that observed in studies performed in the Netherlands (46%) (van Soolingen et al., 1997) and Botswana (42%) (Lockman et al., 2001). In contrast to other studies the difference between female and male patients-clustering were not statistically significant. The ratio of clustered versus non-clustered isolates were 51.6 and 48.4% for male and female TB patients, respectively. This might be due to low education, poverty and malnutrition of female patients. Unlike the other studies that younger age was strongly associated with clustering (Alland et al., 1994; Small et al., 1994; Diaz et al., 2001), in present study patients with older age (≥56 years) were strongly associated with clustering (59.6%), which reflects the likelihood of new infection in elderly people.

This might be due to unemployment and poor living condition and the low prevalence of AIDS syndrome or success of TB control in our area. The low rate of clustering indicates that tuberculosis among the study population results mainly from reactivation of latent infection or success of TB control programs in this region.

We conclude that the high average copy number of IS6110 per isolate in East and West Azarbaijan of Iran confirms the usefulness of this method for epidemiological studies without the necessity of using additional genetic markers. In order to increase the knowledge of epidemiology of the disease, other studies over long period of time and from different parts of the country is needed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Tabriz Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center. We thank staff of Urmia central TB Laboratory and all the staff of Tabriz Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center for their generous cooperation. We also thank Dr. K. Sadaghat for helpful suggestion on statistical analyses.

REFERENCES

  1. Alland, D., G.E. Kalkut, A.R. Moss R.A. McAdam and J.A. Hahn et al., 1994. Transmission of tuberculosis in New Yourk City: An analysis by DNA fingerprinting and conventional epidemiologic methods. N. Engl. J. Med., 330: 1710-1716.


  2. Asgharzadeh, M., K. Shahbabian, J. Majidi, A.M. Aghazadeh and C. Amini et al., 2006. IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from East Azerbaijan province of Iran. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz., 101: 517-521.
    Direct Link  |  


  3. Asgharzadeh, M., K. Shahbabian, H. Samadi Kafil and A. Rafi, 2007. Use of DNA fingerprinting in identifying the source case of tuberculosis in East Azarbaijan province of Iran. J. Medical Sci., 7: 418-421.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  


  4. American Thoracic Society, 2000. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med., 161: 1376-1395.
    Direct Link  |  


  5. Braden, C.R., G.L. Templeton, M.D. Cave, S. Valway and I.M. Onorato et al., 1997. Interpretation of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a state with a large rural population. J. Infect. Dis., 175: 1446-1452.
    Direct Link  |  


  6. De-Boer, A.S., B. Blommerde, P.E.W. De-Haas, M.M. Sebek and K.S. Lambregts-van-Weezenbeek et al., 2002. False-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures in 44 laboratories in the Netherlands (1993 to 2000): Incidence, risk factors and consequences. J. Clin. Microbiol., 40: 4004-4009.
    Direct Link  |  


  7. Diaz, R., R.I. Gomez, E. Restrepo, R. Rumbaut and J. Sevy-Court et al., 2001. Transmission of tuberculosis in Havana, Cuba: A molecular epidemiological study by IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing. Mem. Inst. Oswaldi. Cruz., 96: 437-443.
    Direct Link  |  


  8. Doroudchi, M., K. Kremer, E.A. Basir, M.R. Kadivar D. Van-Soolingen and A.A. Ghaderi, 2000. IS6110-RFLP and Spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Iran. Scand. J. Infect. Dis., 32: 663-668.
    Direct Link  |  


  9. Durmaz, R., S. Gunal, Z. Yang, I.H. Ozerol and M.D. Cave, 2003. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Turkey. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 9: 873-877.
    Direct Link  |  


  10. Farnia, P., F. Mohammadi and G. Fadda, 2001. Transmission pattern of tuberculosis using RFLP-based IS6110. Arch. Irn. Med., 4: 177-182.


  11. Farnia, P., F. Mohammadi, M.R. Masjedi, A. Varnerot and A.Z. Zarifi et al., 2004. Evaluation of tuberculosis transmission in Tehran: Using RFLP and spoligotyping methods. J. Infect., 49: 94-101.
    Direct Link  |  


  12. Gutierrez, M.C., V. Vincent, D. Aubert, J. Bizet and O. Gaillot et al., 1998. Molecular fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and risk factor for tuberculosis transmission in Paris, France and Surrounding Area. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 486-492.
    Direct Link  |  


  13. Kam, K.M., C.W. Yip, M.Y. Chan, C.Y. Mok and W.S. Wong, 1999. IS6110 dot blot hybridization for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 33: 13-18.
    Direct Link  |  


  14. Lockman, S., J.D. Sheppard, C.R. Braden, M.J. Mwasekaga and C.L. Woodley et al., 2001. Molecular and conventional epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Botswana: A population-based prospective study of 301 pulmonary tuberculosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 1042-1047.
    Direct Link  |  


  15. Malik, A.N. and P. Godfrey-Faussett, 2005. Effects of genetic variability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains on the presentation of disease. Lancet Infect. Dis., 5: 174-183.
    PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  


  16. Murray, M., 2002. Determinants of cluster distribution in the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 99: 1538-1543.
    Direct Link  |  


  17. Niemann, S., S. Rusch-Gerdes, E. Richter, H. Thielen, H. Heykes-Uden and R. Diel, 2000. Stability of IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in actual chains of transmission. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 2563-2567.
    Direct Link  |  


  18. Rasolofo-Razanamparany, V., H. Ramarokoto, G. Auregan, B. Gicoquel and S. Chanteau, 2001. A combination of two genetic markers is sufficient for restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 1530-1535.
    Direct Link  |  


  19. Singh, S., K. Gopinath, S. Shahdad, M. Kaur, B. Singh and P. Sharama et al., 2007. Nontuberculousis mycobacterial infections in Indian AIDS patients detected by a novel set of ESAT-6 polymerase chain reaction primers. Jap. J. Infect. Dis., 60: 14-18.
    Direct Link  |  


  20. Small, P.M., P.C. Hopewell, S.P. Singh A. Paz and J. Parsonnet et al., 1994. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco: A population- based study using conventional and molecular methods. N. Engl. J. Med., 330: 1703-1709.
    Direct Link  |  


  21. Van Embden, J.D.A., M.D. Cave, J.T. Crawford, J.W. Dale and K.D. Eisenach et al., 1993. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting recommendation for a standardized methodology. J. Clin. Microbiol., 31: 406-409.
    PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  


  22. Van Soolingen, D., P.E.W. De-Hass, P.W.M. Hermans and J.D.A. Van-Embden, 1994. DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Enzymol., 235: 196-205.
    Direct Link  |  


  23. Van-Soolingen, D., L. Qian, P.E.W. De-Hass, J.T.Douglas and H. Traore et al., 1995. Predominance of a single genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in countries of East Asia. J. Clin. Microbiol., 33: 3234-3238.
    Direct Link  |  


  24. Van-Soolingen, D., M.W. Borgdorff, P.E.W. De-Hass, M.M. Sebek and J. Veen et al., 1999. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in the Netherlands: A nationwide study from 1993 through 1997. J. Infect. Dis., 180: 726-736.
    Direct Link  |  


  25. Vukovie, D., S. Rusch-Gerdes, S. Savi and S. Niemann, 2003. Molecular epidemiology of pulmonary tuberculosis in Belgrade, Central Serbia. J. Clin. Microbiol., 41: 4372-4377.
    Direct Link  |  


  26. Yang, Z.H., P.E.W. De-Hass, D. Van-Soolingen, J.D. Van-Embden and A.B. Andersen, 1994. Restriction fragment length polymorphism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from Greenland during 1992: Evidence of tuberculosis transmission between Greenland and Denmark. J. Clin. Microbiol., 32: 3018-3025.
    Direct Link  |  


©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved