• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science
  2. Vol 18 (1), 2023
  3. 10-19
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science

Year: 2023 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 10-19
DOI: 10.3923/jfas.2023.10.19
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers

Mojekwu T.O. Mojekwu  T.O.'s LiveDNA and C.I. Anumudu C.I.  Anumudu's LiveDNA

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: In Nigeria, there is a paucity of information on the genetic similarity among wild Oreochromis niloticus species. Though there are assertions based on morphological observation, by fish farmers and some researchers of fisheries that most of these species in the wild are no longer pure and possibly hybridizing. Most molecular assessments are usually among tilapia species with limited sample coverage of O. niloticus species or of a lower marker. This was a preliminary investigation of the genetic similarity of Oreochromis niloticus from selected water bodies along the River Niger, in six states of Nigeria, using SSR markers. Materials and Methods: Similarity levels among Oreochromis niloticus from water bodies in six states in Nigeria were assessed using seven SSR markers with their various primers (UNH 208, 143, 104, 022, 119, 180 and 156), which were selected from the NCBI database. Only UNH 104, UNH143 and UNH 022 produced DNA amplifications. Phylogenetic representation using UPGMA cluster analysis produced a dendrogram with a total of 118 clusters grouped into 7 major clusters with up to 8 subgroups, indicating different degrees of variation and similarities. Results: Genetic similarities were observed at various coefficient levels, possibly due to hybridization. At the coefficient level of 1 or 100%, 39 clusters occurred with different samples on each cluster indicating they are genetically the same. Samples from South Delta (SSD), South West Oyo (SWO) and North West Kebbi (NWK) states were always present in each cluster at this coefficient level. A lot of migration is likely taking place among these fishes. The seven major clusters A, B, C, D, E, F and G at varying degrees of similarity 73, 67, 64, 59, 56, 48 and 44% showed the decreasing order of genetic similarity. Conclusion: These data supported the view that the very high similarity between tilapia from these water bodies stems from its highly prolific nature which may have led to a high probability of hybridization between species and strains. The genetic distance between strains may suggest that there are varying levels of genetic variability among O. niloticus in Nigeria water bodies under study.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Mojekwu T.O. and C.I. Anumudu, 2023. Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 18: 10-19.

DOI: 10.3923/jfas.2023.10.19

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jfas.2023.10.19

Search


INTRODUCTION


There are over 75 species of tilapias in the world, out of which about nine species are used in aquaculture globally. There has been a moderate increase in the global Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production, accounting for 8.3% of global aquaculture finfish production in 20181. Hence, it significantly increases world tilapia production from freshwater aquaculture. In Nigeria many tilapia species abound in the wild and some are cultured, but Oreochromis niloticus appears to be one of the more popular among fish farmers2, possibly due to its economic profitability in semi-flow-through culture system3. Genetic characterization of this species in Nigeria water is very important for determining variability and similarities among populations. This will also be useful in aquaculture and fisheries stock management.

Molecular genetic markers are strong tools in determining the genetic uniqueness of individuals, populations or species4-6.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) otherwise called Microsatellites have been applied as a preferred marker in most genetic mapping and genome analysis. This is because they are ample and well spread in the genomes of eukaryotes7-9. The SSR- PCR is a useful tool for estimating the degree of genetic similarity among fish species10-13. They have been applied in differentiating different tilapia species14,15. Microsatellite markers have been utilized to assess red tilapia stock16 and to determine the genetic diversity of genetically improved farm tilapia17,18.

Many tilapia microsatellites have been used to study the inheritance of traits19-22. Salt tolerant tilapia, growth and sex-determining loci of Oreochromis mossambicus× Oreochromis spp., has been mapped using microsatellite11,23. Disease resistance tilapia has also been developed through selective breeding using microsatellite markers24. Microsatellite markers associated with cold tolerance in Oreochromis niloticus have been screened and identified25.

Nonetheless, primer development is quite stressful and usually expensive26. Another disadvantage is that some alleles do not amplify in PCR reactions27. Therefore, this research was a preliminary investigation of the genetic similarity of O. niloticus in selected water bodies along the river Niger in six states in Nigeria using SSR markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study area and fish samples: Two hundred and four specimens identified as O. niloticus species were obtained from six states representing the geo-political zones in Nigeria (Fig. 1). The collection was done between January, 2013 and October, 2013 with the help of local fishermen. Fish were kept on ice until transferred to the lab and frozen at -80°C until analyzed.

Thirty-four individuals from two water bodies in each of the states were sampled: Adamawa (Gariyo and Kiri Lakes), Kebbi State (Birnin Kebbi/Rimer River), Kogi State (Lokoja confluence and Sarkin Noma River), Oyo State (Eleyele lake and Oba Dam), Anambra State (Igbariam and Otuocha Rivers) and Delta State (Warri- Umuochi/Ona River). The laboratory analysis was conducted at the Biotechnology Laboratory of the Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research, Victoria Island, Lagos Nigeria.

DNA extraction and SSR-PCR: Genomic DNA was isolated using the salting out method from the caudal fin according to Lopera-Barrero et al.28. Caudal fins (approximately 3.5-4.5 g) were placed in Eppendorf microtubes with 90% absolute ethanol and maintained in a freezer at -20°C. Lysis buffer (550 μL) containing 7 μL of 200 μg mL–1 of proteinase K was added. The samples were incubated in a water bath at 50°C for 12 hrs. Sodium chloride (660 μL of 5 M) was added and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 mins. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and 700 μL of cold absolute ethanol was used to precipitate the DNA. The samples were incubated at -20°C for 2 hrs. The DNA sample was centrifuged and washed with 700 μL of 70% v/v ethanol. The sample was re-suspended in 80 μL TE buffer (10 mM of Tris pH 8.0 and 1 mM of EDTA). Ribonuclease (30 μg mL–1) was added and incubated at 42°C for 4 hrs. This was stored in the freezer at -20°C before PCR. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm with a Biorad Nano Spectrophotometer.

The PCR reactions were performed in a Biorad I-cycler with the following program. Initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 30 sec at annealing temperature (45-60°C) and 1 min at 72°C, followed by a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified DNA fragments were electrophoresed using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The amplified products were visualized on a UV transilluminator and photographed. The SSR primers used were selected from the database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Table 1)29.

Phylogenetic analysis: Phylogenetic analysis was done using alleles count, the alleles were scored and the distance (UPGMA) method was used to construct a dendrogram that showed the similarities and differences between the genes. The analysis was carried out using NYSYS software.

Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Fig. 1: Map of Nigeria showing sampling sites


Table 1:

Microsatellite markers and primers used in this study from Kocher et al.29
Marker
Expected band size
Primer (5'-3')
Gene Bank accession
UNH208
100
F CTTCTTGGCCTACAATTT
G12359
 
R CAGATGGGTGATAGCAA
UNH143
213
F GCATGCGTGGGTGTTTGTATTGTG
G12295
R TTCGCTCTTTTGTGGGGTGTCTGA
UNH104
138
F GCAGTTATTTGTGGTCACTA
G12257
R GGTATATGTCTAACTGAAATCC
UNH022
257
F GCAGCTCTCGCTCTCTCTCT
G36423
R CGTGCTGAGTTGTGGAGGTA
UNH119
158
F GCAGATATACCTGAGAAAAC
G12272
R AGGTGATAACAAAAAGGGAAT
UNH180
155
F GCAACTAATCACACAATTTT
G12332
R GTTTAAGTTAAAAACAAATTCGTTT
UNH156
188
F GATCATTGGGTGTCATTACTCTCA
G12308
R TCTCTGCCTTCCTCCATTACTCA
F: Forward primer (5’-3’) and R: Reverse primer (3’-5’)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Genetic variation in any species is a resource that is manifested at two different hierarchical levels. The first level is explicit and includes the genetic differences between individuals within a population. The second level of genetic variation is that which exists among the various populations30-32. The SSR markers have become one of the most popular genetic markers because of their high9 polymorphism and PCR-based analysis10,15. Microsatellite bands in this study were always unstable (i.e., strong, faint, fuzzy and sharp) bands generated with each primer because one or more copies of DNA may exist per genome or may be attributed to the varying annealing process between the primer and the DNA.

Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Plate 1: Amplified SSR loci for individuals from North East, Nigeria (Adamawa State)
Lane M is 1 kb DNA ladder, A, B, C are primers UNH 104, UNH143 and UNH 022 showing fragments sizes 138, 200 and 257 bp, respectively and NB: Electrophoresis of remaining 16 individuals for b was run on a different plate not shown here

This problem of mixed bands shows the well-known sensitivity of PCRs10. The SSR fragments generated by primers UNH 208,119,180 and 156 showed low polymorphism among the fishes studied. These primer sequences may have annealed to variable sequences, which might be of great utility at lower taxonomic levels, e.g., for the differentiation of closely related species. However, microsatellite fragments generated by three primers UNH 143, 104 and 022 showed both stable amplification and a high degree of polymorphism. The DNA fragment sizes of these primers range from 138, 200 and 257 bp (Plate 1), respectively. Their sequences may be considered as more conserved sequences, which are most useful in higher taxonomic levels and evolutionary relationships. Their high polymorphism and PCR-based analysis have made them one of the most popular genetic markers10,15. Some microsatellite loci have very high numbers of alleles per locus (>20), making them very useful for applications such as parent-offspring identification in mixed populations, while others have lower numbers of alleles and may be more suited for population genetics and phylogeny11,15,19,33.

Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Image for - Genetic Similarity Levels in Nile Tilapia of Some Nigerian Water Bodies Using SSR Markers
Fig. 2(a-c): Similarity coefficient of among O. niloticus (A unit is 0.03)
SSD: South South Delta, SWO: South West Oyo, SEA: South East Anambra, NWK: North West Kebbi, NEA: North East Adamawa and NCK: North Central Kogi

The phylogenetic analysis generated a dendrogram’ that showed the similarities and differences between the genes. A total of 118 clusters with varying similarity coefficients ranging from 0.44 to 1 were observed (Fig. 2). Thus, for instance, at a similarity coefficient of 100%, 39 clusters occurred out of which only five were interesting: 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E clusters (Fig. 2a and b). They were made up of 15, 15, 23, 9 and 15 samples, respectively. Samples from three states in SSD, SWO and NWK were always present in each cluster at this similarity coefficient. A lot of migration is likely taking place among these fishes over a period. This was in conformity with previous observations of high genetic similarity of Oreochromis niloticus species within the Niger River Basin populations over genetically relevant timescales using SNP markers34.

Seven major clusters of A, B, C, D, E, F, G and sub-clusters a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h were observed. The sub-clusters comprise 10, 6, 5, 3, 6, 10, 28 and 3 clusters at about 73, 77, 73, 79, 66, 62, 56 and 73% similarity coefficients indicating varying levels of similarity. The major clusters showed similarity coefficients of about 73, 67, 64, 59, 56, 48 and 44%, respectively (Fig. 2c). Hence, at cluster G, the level of genetic similarity (44%) within the population is low. Shared bands among O. niloticus in the six geopolitical zones were as high as 73%, hence, there was a high similarity among some strains although primers may differ35. These high similarity levels may be a result of a major event like flooding which is common in Nigeria or escapes from restricted areas (farms). Oreochromis niloticus used in previous work to assess mitochondria diversity of some cichlids in Nigeria also showed varying levels of similarity36. However, varying levels of similarity could be an indication that the species is hybridizing with other tilapia species. The Oreochromis niloticus like other cichlid species can easily hybridize even with other congeneric and produce fertile offspring that at times have the O. niloticus phenotype37-39. The DNA fingerprints of mixed DNA samples have been reported to be useful in assessing the relationship between closely related populations due to the high-level genetic differentiation detected4.

These data supported the view that the very high similarity between tilapia leads to a high probability of hybridization between them, based on the genetic distance between strains we may deduce that there are varying levels of genetic variability among O. niloticus in Nigeria water bodies under study. Genetic variability among O. niloticus observed in this study was consistent with previous studies of this species using both mtDNA and nuclear markers17,22,33,35,40-42.

CONCLUSION


Oreochromis niloticus collected from water bodies in six states representing the geopolitical zones of Nigeria show various levels of genetic similarity. The similarity of intensity may be due to the increased amount of hybridization that occurs in the wild among these species. This study findings recommend the use of a more robust genomic approach like the exon gene-capture method in addressing the issues of hybridization.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


Oreochromis niloticus is well utilized for aquaculture in Nigeria and globally with possibilities of imported strains even hybridizing in the wild when they escape from the farm or through flooding. Our findings using microsatellite markers confirms varying levels of genetic similarities and migration among wild Oreochromis niloticus species from the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. Thereby proving that though pure individuals exist and are spread by events like flooding, introgression might be occurring. Aquaculture and fisheries are faced with challenges, including a lack of pure stock or good seeds to improve fish production. I suggest a robust molecular approach based on a gene capture to ascertain the introgressive hybridization or purity of this species before use in aquaculture or research.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


Mojekwu, T.O. appreciates the genomic mapping of Commercially Important Fishes in Nigerian Waters Project (CARGS project) with identification number RFA No. 3 (2) of the Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria (ARCN) for funding this project. Thanks to NIOMR, the Executive Director, the Head of the Department of Biotechnology, Dr. K. Oresegun and Dr. I. Megbowon, the project team leader for the support, time and advice given to T.O. Mojekwu during this work.

REFERENCES


  1. FAO, 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. FAO, Rome, Italy, ISBN-13: 978-92-5-132692-3, Pages: 244.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Mert, R. and E. Cicek, 2010. Range expansion of introduced tilapia species (Oreochromis niloticus, L. 1758, Cichlidae) in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9: 1753-1756.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  3. Yakubu, A.F., N.A. Nwogu, J.O. Apochi, E.D. Olaji and T.E. Adams, 2014. Economic profitability of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus 1757) in semi flow through culture system. J. Aquat. Sci., 2: 1-4.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Allentoft, M.E., R. Heller, R.N. Holdaway and M. Bunce, 2015. Ancient DNA microsatellite analyses of the extinct New Zealand giant moa (Dinornis robustus) identify relatives within a single fossil site. Heredity, 115: 481-487.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Tripathy, S.K., 2018. Broad spectrum utilities of microsatellite in fish and fisheries. J. Biotechnol. Res., 4: 29-45.
    Direct Link

  6. Chew, P.C., A. Christianus, J.M. Zudaidy, M.Y. Ina-Salwany, C.M. Chong and S.G. Tan, 2021. Microsatellite characterization of Malaysian mahseer (Tor spp.) for improvement of broodstock management and utilization. Animal, Vol. 11.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Tibihika, P.D., M. Curto, E. Dornstauder-Schrammel, S. Winter, E. Alemayehu, H. Waidbacher and H. Meimberg, 2019. Application of microsatellite genotyping by sequencing (SSR-GBS) to measure genetic diversity of the East African Oreochromis niloticus. Conserv. Genet., 20: 357-372.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Vandeputte, M. and P. Haffray, 2014. Parentage assignment with genomic markers: A major advance for understanding and exploiting genetic variation of quantitative traits in farmed aquatic animals. Front. Genet. Vol. 5.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Xiao, T., C. Lu, Y. Xu, C. Li and X. Zheng et al., 2015. Screening of SSR markers associated with scale cover pattern and mapped to a genetic linkage map of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J. Appl. Genet., 56: 261-269.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Briñez, R.B., O.X. Caraballo and V.M. Salazar, 2011. Genetic diversity in six populations of red tilapia, using microsatellites as genetic markers [Spanish]. Rev. MVZ Córdoba, 16: 2491-2498.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Ford, A.G.P., T.R. Bullen, L. Pang, M.J. Genner and R. Bills et al., 2019. Molecular phylogeny of Oreochromis (Cichlidae: Oreochromini) reveals mito-nuclear discordance and multiple colonisation of adverse aquatic environments. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 136: 215-226.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  12. Vieira, M.L.C., L. Santini, A.L. Diniz and C. de Freitas Munhoz, 2016. Microsatellite markers: What they mean and why they are so useful. Genet. Mol. Biol., 39: 312-328.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Sundaray, J.K., K.D. Rasal, V. Chakrapani, P. Swain and D. Kumar et al., 2016. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) markers in fish genomic research and their acceleration via next-generation sequencing and computational approaches. Aquacult. Int., 24: 1089-1102.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Chi, J.R., C.W. Huang, J.L. Wu and S.Y. Hu, 2014. Prolactin I microsatellite as genetic markers for characterization of five Oreochromis tilapia species and two Oreochromis niloticus strains. J. Aquacult. Res. Dev., Vol. 5.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Tibihika, P.D., M. Curto, E. Alemayehu, H. Waidbacher, C. Masembe, P. Akoll and H. Meimberg, 2020. Molecular genetic diversity and differentiation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, L. 1758) in East African natural and stocked populations. BMC Evol. Biol., Vol. 20.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Karuppannan, K.V., I. Noraida and S. Oyyan, 2013. An assessment on red tilapia stocks in Malaysia using microsatellite markers. Int. J. Fish. Aquacult., 5: 78-82.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Anane-Taabeah, G., E.A. Frimpong and E. Hallerman, 2019. Aquaculture-mediated invasion of the genetically improved farmed tilapia (gift) into the lower Volta Basin of Ghana. Diversity, Vol. 11.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Diyie, R.L., S.K. Agyarkwa, E. Armah, N.A. Amonoo, I. Owusu-Frimpong and M.Y. Osei-Atweneboana, 2021. Genetic variations among different generations and cultured populations of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Ghana: Application of microsatellite markers. Aquaculture, Vol. 544.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. Kudo, Y., M. Nikaido, A. Kondo, H. Suzuki, K. Yoshida, K. Kikuchi and N. Okada, 2015. A microsatellite-based genetic linkage map and putative sex-determining genomic regions in lake Victoria cichlids. Gene, 560: 156-164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  20. Liu, F., F. Sun, J. Li, J.H. Xia, G. Lin, R.J. Tu and G.H. Yue, 2013. A microsatellite-based linkage map of salt tolerant tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus x Oreochromis spp.) and mapping of sex-determining loci. BMC Genomics, Vol. 14.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Liu, F., F. Sun, J.H. Xia, J. Li and G.H. Fu et al., 2014. A genome scan revealed significant associations of growth traits with a major QTL and GHR2 in tilapia. Sci. Rep., Vol. 4.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Syaifudin, M., M. Bekaert, J.B. Taggart, K.L. Bartie and S. Wehner et al., 2019. Species-specific marker discovery in tilapia. Sci. Rep., Vol. 9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Lin, G., E. Chua, L. Orban and G.H. Yue, 2016. Mapping QTL for sex and growth traits in salt-tolerant tilapia (Oreochromis spp. X O. mossambicus). PLoS ONE, Vol. 11.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Chen, C.C., C.W. Huang, C.Y. Lin, C.H. Ho and H.N. Pham et al., 2022. Development of disease-resistance-associated microsatellite DNA markers for selective breeding of tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) farmed in Taiwan. Genes, Vol. 13.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Zhu, H.P., Z.G. Liu, M.X. Lu, F.Y. Gao, X.L. Ke and Z.H. Huang, 2015. Screening and identification of microsatellite markers associated with cold tolerance in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Genet. Mol. Res., 14: 10308-10314.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Telles, M.P.C., L.V. Resende, R.P.V. Brondani, R.G Collevatti, M.C. Costa and N.J. Silva Júnior, 2010. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers in the armored catfish Hypostomus gymnorhynchus (Loricariidae). Genet. Mol. Res., 9: 1770-1774.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. O'Reilly, P. and J.M. Wright, 1995. The evolving technology of DNA fingerprinting and its application to fisheries and aquaculture. J. Fish Biol., 47: 29-55.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Lopera-Barrero, N.M., J.A. Povh, R.P. Ribeiro, P.C. Gomes, C.B. Jacometo and T. da Silva Lopes, 2008. Comparison of DNA extraction protocols of fish fin and larvae samples: Modified salt (NaCl) extraction [Spanish]. Cien. Inv. Agr., 35: 77-86.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Kocher, T.D., W.J. Lee, H. Sobolewska, D. Penman and B. McAndrew, 1998. A genetic linkage map of a cichlid fish, the Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Genetics, 148: 1225-1232.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  30. Chen, Z., C. Hu, L. Wang, G. Chen and J. Wang et al., 2015. Microsatellite-based genetic structure and differentiation of goldfish (Carassius auratus) with sarcoma. Open J. Anim. Sci., 5: 36-43.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Doyle, J.M., G. Siegmund, J.D. Ruhl, S.H. Eo and M.C. Hale et al., 2013. Microsatellite analyses across three diverse vertebrate transcriptomes (Acipenser fulvescens, Ambystoma tigrinum, and Dipodomys spectabilis). Genome, 56: 407-414.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Zhang, C., B. Vornam, K. Volmer, K. Prinz and F. Kleemann et al., 2015. Genetic diversity in aspen and its relation to arthropod abundance. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 5.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Domingos, J.A., C. Smith-Keune and D.R. Jerry, 2014. Fate of genetic diversity within and between generations and implications for DNA parentage analysis in selective breeding of mass spawners: A case study of commercially farmed barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Aquaculture, 424-425: 174-182.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Lind, C.E., S.K. Agyakwah, F.Y. Attipoe, C. Nugent, R.P.M.A. Crooijmans and A. Toguyeni, 2019. Genetic diversity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) throughout West Africa. Sci. Rep., Vol. 9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Bardakci, F. and D.O. Skibinski, 1994. Application of the RAPD technique in tilapia fish: Species and subspecies identification. Heredity, 73: 117-123.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  36. Agbebi, O.T., C.J. Echefu, I.O. Adeosun, A.H. Ajibade and E.A. Adegbite et al., 2016. Mitochondrial diversity and time divergence of commonly cultured cichlids in Nigeria. Biotechnol. J. Int., Vol. 13.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Meier, J.I., D.A. Marques, S. Mwaiko, C.E. Wagner, L. Excoffier and O. Seehausen, 2017. Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations. Nat. Commun., Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Shechonge, A., B.P. Ngatunga, R. Tamatamah, S.J. Bradbeer and J. Harrington et al., 2018. Losing cichlid fish biodiversity: Genetic and morphological homogenization of tilapia following colonization by introduced species. Conserv. Genet., 19: 1199-1209.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  39. Stelkens, R.B., K.A. Young and O. Seehausen, 2010. The accumulation of reproductive incompatibilities in African cichlid fish. Evolution, 64: 617-633.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Agnèse, J.F., B. Adépo-Gourène, E.K. Abban and Y. Fermon, 1997. Genetic differentiation among natural populations of the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Teleostei, Cichlidae). Heredity, 79: 88-96.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Bezault, E., P. Balaresque, A. Toguyeni, Y. Fermon, H. Araki, J.F. Baroiller and X. Rognon, 2011. Spatial and temporal variation in population genetic structure of wild Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) across Africa. BMC Genet., Vol. 12.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  42. Iyiola, O.A., R.D. Shaibu, S.O. Oladipo, K.O. Kareem and L.M. Nneji et al., 2022. Population genetic structure of three cichlids in ‎Ilorin, North-Central Nigeria. Iraqi J. Vet. Med., 46: 1-9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Search


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved