• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Entomology
  2. Vol 16 (1), 2019
  3. 1-8
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Entomology

Year: 2019 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-8
DOI: 10.3923/je.2019.1.8
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)

Raafat Mohamed Shaapan Raafat  Mohamed Shaapan's LiveDNA and Ahmed Zeinhom Shehata

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: Musca domestica is an important mechanical vector of many pathogenic agents causing serious problems to human livestock. Application of chemical insecticides for control of M. domestica resulted in well-known problems to human, environment and non-target organisms, thus there is an urgent need to develop a new materials to avoid the hazards of chemical insecticides. The present study investigated the effect of different extracts from leaves of Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora on M. domestica third instars larvae, resulted pupae and reproductive potential of females resulted from treated larvae. Materials and Methods: Musca domestica reared under controlled conditions of temperature, relative humidity and photoperiod. Tested plants collected and leaves were extracted with ethanol 70%, chloroform and hexane. Different concentrations of each extract were mixed with larval artificial diet instead of water to detect the activity of tested extracts against M. domestica. Results: Larvicidal bioassay showed that hexane extracts from tested plants recorded the highest activity against M. domestica as compared with other 2 extracts. The LC50 values of T. stellata and E. citriodora (leaves) hexane extracts recorded 81.07 and 187.79 ppm, respectively. All tested extracts significantly (p<0.05) reduced the fecundity and increased the sterility index of females resulted from treated larvae. Sterility index recorded 64.21 and 59.28% by 130 and 250 ppm of T. stellata and E. citriodora (leaves) hexane extracts, respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggested that T. stellata and E. citriodora tested extracts considered to be promising alternative agents for the control of M. domestica.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: January 10, 2019;   Accepted: January 15, 2019;   Published: February 22, 2019
Copyright: © 2019. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How to cite this article

Raafat Mohamed Shaapan and Ahmed Zeinhom Shehata, 2019. Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae). Journal of Entomology, 16: 1-8.

DOI: 10.3923/je.2019.1.8

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=je.2019.1.8

INTRODUCTION


The house fly, Musca domestica L. is an important mechanical vector distributed throughout the tropical and warm temperate regions, as well as some cooler areas1. It is the carrier of many pathogenic bacteria as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholera, Shigella and Salmonella sp.2 as well as its ability to transmit protozoa and helminth eggs causing several health problems to human beings and livestock3. Adult houseflies can transmit pathogens by their sponging mouthparts, through vomiting, on their body and leg hairs, on the sticky parts of the feet and through the intestinal tract causing food contamination4.

The usage of chemical insecticides for many decades resulted in many well-known and serious problems, such as developing insect resistance5 and substantial hazards to a variety of non-target organisms and environment in the form of biomagnification6. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a new materials which will be safe, ecofriendly and low cost in order to avoid the hazards of chemical insecticides. On the other hand, natural compounds from plants (botanical insecticides) are expected to be possible alternatives1. These compounds affect insect populations by reducing their developmental, survival and reproductive rate7,8. From these points of view, the present study evaluated the activity of different crude extracts of Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora against different stages of M. domestica.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Tested flies: The house flies, Musca domestica reared in Medical Entomology Insectary, Animal House, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University under controlled conditions of temperature (25-27°C), relative humidity (55- 60%) and (12-12) light-dark regime. Larvae were reared on an artificial diet (wheat bran, milk, powder yeast; 200:100:5 g) per 200 mL distilled water, while emerged flies were fed on dry diet (milk powder) and sucrose solution (cotton pads soaked in 10% sucrose solution)9.

Plants and extraction: Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora belonging to Fabaceae and Verbenaceae collected during June, 2017 from El- Fayoum Governorate, Egypt. Leaves of two plants washed and dried under shade at room temperature and then ground into a powder. Samples of 100 g of powder were extracted using ethanol 70%, chloroform and hexane at a rate of 3 mL g–1 for 24 h extraction period at room temperature, then the supernatant were decanted and filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 5) and the solvents were evaporated to dryness under vacuum using a rotary evaporator with a water bath adjusted10 to 40°C. The dry extracts were kept in a deep freezer (-18) until used.

Larvicidal bioassay: Different concentrations of each extract were mixed with larval artificial diet instead of water to detect mortality percepts. Ethanol 70% tested materials were dissolved in 0.1 mL of ethanol 70%, while the tested materials of chloroform and hexane extracts were dissolved in 2 drops of Tween80 as emulsifier to facilitate the dissolving oils of tested material in water. About 25 of third instar larvae were put immediately into plastic cups contained media with different concentrations of extracts. Three replicates were used for each tested concentration. Control larvae received 0.1 mL of ethanol 70% or 2 drop of Tween80 in 100 mL water11. Mortality in larvae and pupae was recorded daily until adult emergence. Larval and pupal mortality was calculated using the equation of Briggs12. Growth index was estimated after Hassan et al.11.

Reproductive potential of resulted females: Females that succeeded to emerge from third larval instar treated with each concentration were collected and transferred with untreated males obtained from the colony and were fed for 5 days. After oviposition, the eggs were counted using a binocular and then the mean values were taken. Sterility index was estimated according to the formula of Tappozada et al.13.

Statistical analysis: Data were subjected to ANOVA to find out the differences among the activity of plant extracts using Tucky’s HSD test at 5% probability level. The LC50 were calculated using probit analysis14. All the statistical analyses were carried out using Statistical Package Social Science (SPSS) software15 version 23. Results represented as Mean±SD.

Ethical approval: The data of this study was approved by National Research Centre Ethics Committee (approved at date of 1/7/2015).

RESULTS


Ethanol extract of Trigonella stellata (leaves) recorded complete larval mortality (100.0%) at 700 ppm and the pupal mortality recorded 100.0% at 600 ppm. Also, the adult emergence recorded 66.3 and 27.8% at the highest concentrations (400 and 500 ppm), respectively. Meanwhile, at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300 and 350 ppm the chloroform extract recorded 6.7, 20.0, 33.3, 46.7, 65.3, 90.7 and 100.0% larval mortality, the highest pupal mortality (58.3%) induced by chloroform extract at the highest concentration (300 ppm). In addition, the highest and lowest larval mortality (100 and 6.7%) recorded by hexane extract at 150 and 30 ppm and pupal mortality recorded 44.4% at the highest concentration (130 ppm). Also, T. stellata tested extracts insignificantly (p>0.05) affected the larval period except for hexane extract at the higher concentrations (90, 110 and 130 ppm), where the larval period prolonged significantly (p<0.05) to record 2.38±0.15, 2.55±0.06 and 2.71±0.04 days vs. 1.95±0.05 days for the control group. Also, chloroform and hexane extracts significantly affected (p<0.001) the pupal period at all concentrations used. A very retarded effect on growth of larvae, pupae and adult M. domestica was observed by T. stellata ethanol, chloroform and hexane extracts, where the growth index recorded 3.57, 4.87 and 6.08 at 500, 300 and 130 ppm, respectively, compared with 15.46, 16.50 and 16.34 for the untreated groups (Table 1).

The complete larval mortality (100%) attained by ethanol, chloroform and hexane extracts of E. citriodora leaves at 900, 500 and 350 ppm. Chloroform extract recorded the highest pupal mortalities (100 and 70%) at 450 and 400 ppm, respectively. In addition, E. citriodora tested extracts significantly (p<0.05) prolonged the developmental period of larvae and pupae as compared with the untreated groups (Table 2).

Based on LC50 and LC90 values recorded that, hexane extract of T. stellata and E. citriodora (leaves) were the most effective extract against M. domestica larvae compared with chloroform and ethanol extracts (Table 3).

Data arranged in Table 4 indicated that, there was a significant (p<0.05) decrease in fecundity of females resulted from larvae treated with T. stellata tested extracts. Also, the lowest hatchability percentages of eggs laid (77.23 and 78.46) recorded for females resulted from larvae treated with 130 and 110 ppm of hexane extract. The sterility index recorded 50.78, 62.22 and 64.21 at 500, 250 and 130 ppm by T. stellata ethanol, chloroform and hexane extracts, respectively (Table 4). On the other hand, ethanol extract of E. citriodora (leaves) significantly (p<0.001) decreased the fecundity of females resulted from treated pupae at 600 and 700 ppm as the number of eggs laid/female recorded 41.63±1.30 and 39.20±3.03 vs. 59.0±3.95 egg/female for the control group. Also, the lowest hatching percent recorded by hexane extract was 80.22% at 250 ppm, respectively, compared with 98.22% for the untreated group.

Table 1:Effect of T. stellata (leaves) tested extracts on different stages of M. domestica
Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p>0.05)

Table 2:Effect of E. citriodora (leaves) tested extracts on different stages of M. domestica
Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p>0.05)

Table 3:Relative efficiency of T. stellata and E. citriodora (leaves) tested extracts against M. domestica larvae
Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
χ2: Chi square value, n.s: Non-significant (p>0.05)

Table 4:Effect of T. stellata (leaves) tested extracts on reproductive potential of M. domestica females
Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p>0.05)

Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
Fig. 1(a-f): (a, d) Normal larvae and pupae, (b, c) Malformations in larval stage and (e, f) Malformations in pupal stage

Table 5:Effect of E. citriodora (leaves) tested extracts on reproductive potential of M. domestica females
Image for - Efficacy of Trigonella stellata (Fabaceae) and Eucalyptus citriodora (Verbenaceae) Extracts against the House Fly, Musca domestica (Diptera:Muscidae)
Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p>0.05)

In addition, a remarkable increase in the percentage of sterility index was observed, where it was 39.33, 45.22 and 59.28% by E. citriodora (leaves) ethanol, chloroform and hexane extracts at 700, 400 and 250 ppm, respectively (Table 5).

Clear malformations in M. domestica larvae and pupae induced after treatment of the third larval instar with tested extracts were represented in Fig. 1. Morphological larval abnormalities (Fig. 1b , c) include brown pigmentation and a weakness in cuticle. Morphological pupal abnormalities (Fig. 1e, f) include larvi form pupation, irregular shaped and shrinkage pupae and larval-pupal intermediates.

DISCUSSION


Results of the present study showed that, the toxicity ethanol 70%, chloroform and hexane extracts of Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora (leaves) against M. domestica larvae and resulted pupae varied according to solvent used in extraction and the concentration of the extract, hexane extract from tested plant species was the most effective extract as compared with ethanol 70% and chloroform extracts. These results confirmed earlier reports for Calotropis procera and Anonna squamosa leaves crude ethanolic extracts where, LC50 values recorded 282.5 and 550 ppm against 3rd larval instar of M. domestica16, C. procera (seeds) ethanolic extracts where, complete mortality (100.0%) in M. domestica third larval instar achieved17 by 500 ppm, C. procera, Piper longum and Polygonum hydropiper whole-plant boiled extracts where, LC50 were 557.89, 981.02 and 773.27 μL against M. domestica larvae18, Ocimum basilicum crude extract where, LC50 recorded 110 ppm against M. domestica larvae19, Lantana camara leaves ethanol 70%, acetone and petroleum ether extracts which recorded 1462.6, 959.3 and 607.3 ppm (LC50) against M. domestica third larval instar20 and petroleum ether extract of Lagenaria siceraria which was found to be more effective against third larval instar of M. domestica with LC50 101.4 ppm than chloroform, acetone and methanol extracts with LC50 433.8, 432.1 and 468.5 ppm, respectively11. In addition, prolongation in M. domestica larval and pupal periods by all tested extracts agree the previous results of Lupinustermis, C. procera and Atriplex inflate21,22, using Artemisia monosperma, Conyza dioscoridis, Clerodedron inerme and Clocasia antiqorum23, L. camara and Cupressus macrocarpa (leaves) powders24 and L. camara (leaves and stems)20.

Also, a reduction in M. domestica adult emergence percent as a result of tested extracts was observed. Similar observations noted by chloroform extract of Ricinus communis which recorded 12.75 and 25.55% reduction in M. domestica adult emergence after treating third larval instar25, Petiveria alliacea and Flueggae virosa which induced 10.0, 9.0, 11.9, 11.9 and 13.8% reduction in M. domestica adult emergence at the concentration26 of 15.0% and L. siceraria (leaves) methanol and chloroform extracts which recorded the lowest M. domestica adult emergence percent (16.5%) at 1000 and 800 ppm, respectively11. In addition, the growth index of M. domestica was decreased as the concentration of the extract increased; such results are in agreement with the results obtained by Fouda et al.20 using L. camara (leaves and stems) extracts against M. domestica.

On the other hand, the effect of tested extracts extended to females resulted from treated larvae, fecundity of resulted females decreased and the sterility index increased as compared with the control groups. Earlier authors revealing the possible reasons for the reduction of insect fecundity, as a result of treatment with plant extracts to the weakened physical stage of the treated insects27, mild suppressing effect exerted by the plant extract on the insect's mating-decisive factor28, reduction in the number of normal sperms produced by males29, a blockage in ovarian activity, as the tested botanical products may interfere with oogenesis which, in turn, results in a complete and irreversible sterility of insect female flies30and a delay or reduction of ova giving some opportunities not for retention but for possible egg re-sorption within ovaries. Also, delay could be due, in part, to a lower metabolic rate31,32. Reduction in fecundity and increasing sterility index of M. domestica were similar to observations reported by A. inflate22, aqueous leaf extract of Nicotiana tabacum33and methanol, acetone, chloroform and petroleum ether extract of L. siceraria leaves11.

Malformations in M. domestica larvae and pupae as a result of tested extracts including brown pigmentation and a weakness in larval cuticle, larviform pupation and irregular shaped, shrinkage pupae are similar to those obtained by using essential oils against Lucilia sericata and M. domestica different stages34,35.

CONCLUSION


The findings of the present study revealed that, Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora tested extracts considered as important alternative agents for the control of the house fly, Musca domestica. Also, more studies are needed to reach the bioactive compounds in two plant species.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


The findings of the present study suggested that Trigonella stellata and Eucalyptus citriodora tested extracts considered to be promising alternative agents for the control of Musca domestica. The hexane extracts from tested plants recorded the highest activity against M. domestica as compared with ethanol and chloroform extracts.

REFERENCES


  1. Bisseleua, H.B.D., S.W.K. Gbewonyo and D. Obeng-Ofori, 2008. Toxicity, growth regulatory and repellent activities of medicinal plant extracts on Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidea). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 4635-4642.
    Direct Link

  2. Greenberg, B., 1973. Flies and Disease, Volume II: Biology and Disease Transmission. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0691080932, Pages: 447.

  3. Khan, M.F. and S.M. Ahmed, 2000. Toxicity of crude neem leaf extract against housefly Musca domestica L. Adults as compared with DDVP, dichlorvos. Turk. J. Zool., 24: 219-223.
    Direct Link

  4. De Jesus, A.J., A.R. Olsen, J.R. Bryce and R.C. Whiting, 2004. Quantitative contamination and transfer of Escherichia coli from foods by houseflies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Int. J. Food Microbiol., 93: 259-262.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Ahmed, S.M., H. Chander and J. Pereira, 1981. Insecticidal potential and biological activity of Indian indigenous plants against Musca domestica L. Int. Pest Control, 23: 170-175.
    Direct Link

  6. Gold, L.S., T.H. Slone, B.N. Ames and N.B. Manley, 2001. Pesticide Residues in Food and Cancer Risk: A Critical Analysis. In: Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, Volume 1: Principles, Krieger, R.I. and W.C. Krieger (Ed.). 2nd Edn., Chapter 38, Academic Press, San Diego, CA., USA., ISBN: 978-0-12-426260-7, pp: 799-843
    Direct Link

  7. Singh, D. and D.C. Jain, 1987. Relative toxicity of various organic solvents generally used in screening plant products for insecticidal activity against the house fly Musca domestica L. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 25: 560-570.

  8. Carlini, C.R. and M.F. Grossi-de-Sa, 2002. Plant toxic proteins with insecticidal properties. A review on their potentialities as bioinsecticides. Toxicon, 40: 1515-1539.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Busvin, J.R., 1962. A laboratory technique for measuring the susceptibility of house-flies and blowflies to insecticides. Lab. Pract., 11: 464-468.
    Direct Link

  10. Hassan, M.I., M.A. Fouda, K.M. Hammad, M.A. Tanani and A.Z. Shehata, 2014. Repellent effect of Lagenaria siceraria Extracts against Culex pipiens. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 44: 243-248.
    PubMed

  11. Hassan, M.I., A.S. Bream, A.Z.I. Shehata and H.A. Ahmed, 2018. Larvicidal and repellent activity of Lagenaria siceraria (cucurbitaceae) extracts against the house fly: Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 48: 45-53.
    Direct Link

  12. Briggs, J.D., 1960. Reduction of adult house-fly emergence by the effects of Bacillus spp. on the development of immature forms. J. Insect. Pathol., 2: 418-432.
    Direct Link

  13. Tappozada, A., S. Abdallah and M.E. Eldefrawi, 1966. Chemosterilization of larvae and adults of the egyptian cotton leafworm, Prodenia litura, by Apholate, Metepa and Tepa. J. Econ. Entomol., 59: 1125-1128.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Reddy, P.J., D. Krishna, U.S. Murty and K. Jamil, 1992. A microcomputer fortran program for rapid determination of lethal concentrations of biocides in mosquito control. Comput. Applic. Biosci., 8: 209-213.
    PubMedDirect Link

  15. SPSS., 2007. SPSS for Windows. Version 11.5, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL., USA.

  16. Begum, N., B. Sharma and R.S. Pandey, 2010. Evaluation of insecticidal efficacy of Calotropis procera and Annona squamosa ethanol extracts against Musca domestica. J. Biofertil. Biopestici., Vol. 1.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Begum, N., B. Sharma and R.S. Pandey, 2011. Toxicity potential and anti ache activity of some plant extracts in musca domestica. J. Biofertilizers Biopesticides, Vol. 2.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Aktar, M.J. and M.S. Islam, 2015. An eco-friendly approach to reduce reproductive attributes in the housefly, Musca domestica L. using crude plant extracts. Scholars Acad. J. Biosci., 3: 443-451.
    Direct Link

  19. Morey, R.A., 2016. Evaluation of crude extracts of Citrus limon and Ocimum basilicum against Musca domestica L. Proceedings of the National Conference on Environment and Development, September 9-10, 2016, Dr. B. N. Purandare Arts and Smt. S.G. Gupta Commerce & Science College, Lonavla, Pune, Maharashtra, India, pp: 69-72.

  20. Fouda, M.A., M.I. Hassan, A.Z. Shehata, A.I. Hasaballah and M.E. Gad, 2017. Larvicidal and antifeedant activities of different extracts from leaves and stems of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) against the housefly, Musca domestica L. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 85-98.
    Direct Link

  21. Assar, A.A., 2002. Biological and histopathological effects of the water plant extract of Oshaar and Termis on the larvae of the house Fly, Musca domestica vincina. macq. (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Egypt Ger. Soc. Zool., 38: 35-51.
    Direct Link

  22. Assar, A.A., 2003. Biological effects of the water extract of qataf Atriplex inflate (Chenopodiaceae) on the Housefly, Musca domestica vicina Macq. (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Egypt. Germ. Soc. Zool., 41: 15-28.

  23. Bakr, M.E., N.E. Nassef, A.A. Assar, M.M. El-Sobky and S.A. Shams-El-Din, 2003. Biological and morphological effects of water extracts of some plants on the house fly, Musca domestica vicina Macq. (Diptera: Muscidae). J. Egypt. Ger. Soc. Zool., 41: 29-47.

  24. Elkattan, N.A.I., K.S. Ahmed, S.M. Elbermawy and R.M. Abdel-Gawad, 2011. Effect of some botanical materials on certain biological aspects of the house fly, Musca domestica L. Egypt. J. Hosp. Med., 42: 33-48.
    Direct Link

  25. Singh, A. and J. Kaur, 2016. Toxicity of leaf extracts of Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceace) against the third instar larvae of Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Am. J. BioSci., 4: 5-10.

  26. Olaleye, T., W.A. Muse, A. Imeh-Nathaniel and T.I. Nathaniel, 2017. Biological effects of Petiveria alliacea and Flueggae virosa on the life cycle of a disease vector (Musca domestica). Int. J. Pure Applied Zool., 5: 45-51.
    Direct Link

  27. Tripathi, A.K., V. Prajapati, P.S. Khanuja and S. Kumar, 2003. Effect of d-limonene on three stored-product beetles. J. Econ. Entomol., 96: 990-995.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Engelmann, F., 1970. The Physiology of Insect Reproduction. Pergamon Press Inc., New York, USA., ISBN: 9781483186535, Pages: 320.
    Direct Link

  29. El-Meniawi, F.A., M. Hashem, S.M. El-Mesieri and I.A. Rawash, 1999. Physiological effects of neem seed extracts on the reproductive activities of the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis Boisd. Alex. J. Agric. Res., 44: 79-96.

  30. Khan, M., M.A. Hossain and M.S. Islam, 2007. Effects of neem leaf dust and a commercial formulation of a neem compound on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 3656-3661.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  31. Taher, M. and L.K. Cutkomp, 1983. Effects of sublethal doses of DDT and three other insecticides on Tribolium confusum J. Du V. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 19: 43-50.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Lucantoni, L., F. Giusti, M. Cristofaro, L. Pasqualini, F. Esposito, P. Lupetti and A. Habluetzel, 2006. Effects of a neem extract on blood feeding, oviposition and oocyte ultrastructure in Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Tissue Cell, 38: 361-371.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Ogbalu, O.K., R.B. Bobmanuel and O. Membere, 2014. Larvicidal effect of aqueous leaf extract of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) on the third instar larvae of Musca domestica L. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 7: 35-40.

  34. Khater, H.F. and D.F. Khater, 2009. The insecticidal activity of four medicinal plants against the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Int. J. Dermatol., 48: 492-497.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  35. Mansour, S.A., R.F.A. Bakr, R.I. Mohamed and N.M. Hasaneen, 2011. Larvicidal activity of some botanical extracts, commercial insecticides and their binary mixtures against the housefly, Musca domestica L. Open Toxinol. J., 4: 1-13.
    Direct Link

Related Articles

Effects of Neem Leaf Dust and a Commercial Formulation of a Neem Compound on the Longevity, Fecundity and Ovarian Development of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved