Submit Manuscript

Journal of Entomology

Year: 2018 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 155-160
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

ABSTRACT

Background and Objective: Scorpions are considered as one of the most important natural hazards and introduced as a dangerous arthropods. Reproduction is the key factor for survival of any species, then interest has increased in knowing the litter size of a female scorpion species. The aim of present study was to determine the litter size and abundance of newborns in the most important of scorpions in laboratory condition. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, scorpions which represented six medically important species were collected from their natural habitats in two provinces of Khuzestan and Isfahan of Iran. All females gave birth in laboratory condition. The number of juveniles for each species were counted immediately after newborns were detected. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS for window version 16.0. Results: The litter size for Hemiscorpius lepturus was 15-31, Odonthobutus doriae 10-25, Mesobuthus eupeus 14-29, Androctonus crassicauda 15-45, Orthochirus scrobiculosus 12-21 and Olivierus caucasicus 19-23 . All parturitions were occurred from late August to mid-October in the laboratory. The findings of the present study indicated that in the laboratory conditions, the litter size for A. crassicauda was the most whereas this value for O. scrobiculosus was less than the other species. Conclusion: It can be concluded that perhaps there is a positive correlation between the maternal female size and the litter size.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: October 16, 2018;   Accepted: November 07, 2018;   Published: November 28, 2018
Copyright: © 2018. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How to cite this article

Rouhullah Dehghani, Fatemeh Kamiabi, Hamid Kassiri, Afsaneh Hashemi, Narges Mohammadzadeh and Fatemeh Gharagazloo, 2018. A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical Scorpions Species (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran. Journal of Entomology, 15: 155-160.

DOI: 10.3923/je.2018.155.160

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=je.2018.155.160

INTRODUCTION

Scorpions are arthropods of medical importance, classified in the Class Arachnida. They have known as animal with poisonous and painful sting. They exist up to 52 latitudes of northern hemisphere and 50 latitudes of southern hemisphere. They are more present in the tropical and subtropical areas. More than 2000 species of scorpion have been identified1-3. A limited number of species, about 50-79 are actually responsible for serious or lethal incidents. Most deadly species belong to the family Buthidae; though, species belonging to two other families, Scorpionidae and Hemiscorpiidae, also threaten humans3,4.

Scorpion sting is the main health concern in some African, Middle Eastern, Eastern and Central American countries5-14. More than 1.23 million scorpion stings are occur in the world annually, of which resulting to over 0.27% deaths15,16. Scorpions are common arthropods in urban and rural areas of Iran. The Iranian species have been classified in three families of Buthidae, Scorpionidae and Hemscorpiidae, comprising of 64 species from 19 genera17. A few known species of these responsible for severe envenoming and considered medically important18.

Hemiscorpius lepturus, Androctonus crassicauda and Mesobuthus eupeus are the scorpions of medical importance in Iran. Whereas Buthotus schach, Odonthobutus doriae, Buthotus saulcyi, Apistobuthus pterygosercus and Olivierus caucasicus are less important species in this country and their stings have happened sporadically19-23. About 40000-50000 cases of scorpion sting and a number of deaths has been reported annually in Iran24,25.

Scorpions are viviparous2. Two different reproductive strategies are found in female scorpions: the female breeds only a single time during its life (Semelparity) and the other one when the female breeds more than a single time during its lifetime (Iteroparity)26.

In spite of the fact that scorpions are a major public health problem, It knowless about scorpions than other arachnids. Without knowledge of the reproductive biology of scorpions, the other aspects of their life cannot be fully achieved. Litter size is one of the important point of scorpion life which is poorly known. Studies have been shown that the larger females usually produce more broods and have a greater reproductive investment. However this subject do not happen for all species even for populations of a species26,27.

Because of the studies on litter size of scorpion in Iran are rare, the present study was conducted to identify and determine the litter size of these arthropods in laboratory condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this descriptive study, six important scorpion species were collected from their natural habitats in provinces of Khuzestan and Isfahan. This study was conducted in May, July, August and September during 2014-2016 at the entomology lab of Kashan University of Medical Sciences.

Each sample was collected by three collector in 3 h. The collected scorpions were put in glass containers labeled essential information and delivered to the entomology laboratory of Kashan University of Medical Sciences for an accurate identification of the species using diagnostic keys28,29. Males were separated and excluded of the study. Totally 54 females of different species of scorpions were kept in glass containers separately in the laboratory conditions (27-31°C) and fed them with the German cockroach, to study their litter size. The gravid scorpions were identified by observing their big bellies. All females gave birth in laboratory condition. The number of living and dead juveniles for each species were counted immediately after parturition. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS for window version 16.0.

RESULTS

The result of present study for 54 females representing six species of scorpion summarized in Table 1. According to presented data the mean litter size of each species was as follow: H. lepturus (Fig. 1 and 2), 24.54±2.04 (Mean±SD) in 13 delivery, O. doriae, 19.33±1.98 in 12 delivery, M. eupeus (Fig. 3), 20.25±1.75 in 12 delivery, A. crassicauda (Fig. 4), 28.87±2.7 in 8 delivery, O. scrobiculosus (Fig. 5 and 6), 16.83±4.13 in 6 delivery and O. caucasicus, 20.67±1.75 in 3 delivery (Table 1). According to this data, the litter size of A. crassicauda was the most whereas this value for O. scrobiculosus was the least.

The first molt, in offsprings for all studied species was observed in the first 10 days after birth while juveniles were carrying by their mother. Hemiscorpius lepturus species showed cannibalistic behavior in the laboratory condition. Fifty percent of samples of H. lepturus females fed their own juveniles. This phenomenon was not observed among other scorpion species.

Table 1:Litter size of six scorpions of medical importance in Iran
Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 1:Gravid female of Hemiscorpius lepturus

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 2:Hemiscorpius lepturus carrying first instar juveniles

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 3:Mesobuthus eupeus carrying first instar juveniles

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 4:Gravid female of Androctonus crassicauda

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 5:Gravid female of Orthochirus scrobiculosus

Image for - A Study on Litter Size in Several Important Medical ScorpionsSpecies (Arachnida: Scorpionida), I.R. Iran
Fig. 6:Orthochirus scrobiculosus carrying first instar juveniles

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study indicated that the litter size for different species of scorpions was varied in the laboratory condition. The findings revealed that the litter size for six important scorpion species in the laboratory condition varies from 10-45. While other researcher reported that this value was vary30-32 from 6-91. It reported the litter size for different species of scorpions from 6-90 and 20-60 respectively28,33. Studies have been shown that the litter size for different species of scorpion is variable27. The number of larvae born by A. crassicauda species was the most whereas this number for O. scrobiculosus species was less than the other species. It can be concluded that there is a direct correlation between the female body size of scorpions and increase the litter size.

The significant positive correlation between litter size and female size has been reported in some studies30,34. while Outeda-Jorge et al.27 reported that the non-significant correlation between these two variables for Tityus serelatus species. However it was observed that bigger females tended to born larger litter but it do not always happen. It may be associated with environmental condition and physiological structure of female scorpion. Litter size can be decrease in any female scorpion species in the end of their age, because of decrease of their follicles35,36.

In this study all deliveries were occurred from late August to mid-October. It shown that majority of births occurred during warm seasons in south America, (September-April). Most of scorpions give birth during December-March (Summer)27. Opportunistic and Synantropic scorpions, are able to deliver their brood throughout the year, thus can increase their population and threaten the human health32,37.

Among the species studied in the present study, only H. lepturus showed cannibalistic behavior and fed on their own larvae. Cannibalism can be observed among scorpions. This behavior may be resulting of the laboratory conditions26,38. It can be varied among specific species due to their physical and physiological structures and various environmental condition. It was reported that about 16% of the adults total diet was provided by newborn mortality. Most newborn mortality happen within the first 90 days of their life39. It was observed that a few Tityus bahiensis juveniles cannibalized by the female during delivery40. Likewise results of a study revealed that 80% of female Rhopalurus rochai Borelli, 1910 showed cannibalistic behavior during delivery41.

For each species, the reproductive rate and the number of newborns should be studied under laboratory conditions. Also, as scorpion nesting behavior is an essential issue in scorpionology, the nesting behaviors of scorpions should be examined. Meanwhile, it is suggested to identify the habitats of scorpions in each region in order to optimize prevention.

CONCLUSION

In small species, the number of newborns per birth was lower in compared with big species. The birth of scorpion newborns in laboratory conditions may not be the same as normal conditions .Therefore, at the same time, the number of newborns in both natural and laboratory conditions should be investigated. Level of knowledge of important aspects of scorpion reproduction is still elementary. For better understanding the scorpion reproduction, doing more experiments for any species are recommended.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discovered the numbers of newborn of some medical important of scorpions that can be beneficial for future studies. This study will help the researchers to uncover the critical areas of biology of scorpions that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus a new theory on breeding of scorpions may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

S

We highly appreciate the assistance and collaboration of the honorable Social Determinants of Health (SDH) Research Center and Department of Environment Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, the laboratory staffs and other stakeholders and also Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. The study was approved by the Social Determinants of Health Research Center of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. The ethical principles of this research were investigated and discussed in the research committee of the above mentioned department and after making needed modifications, it was approved. The study has been done in accordance with the provisions of the Hillsinki Declaration.

REFERENCES

  1. Dehghani, R., J. Rafinejad, B. Fathi, M.P. Shahi, M. Jazayeri and A. Hashemi, 2017. A retrospective study on scropionism in Iran (2002-2011). J. Arthropod Borne Dis., 11: 194-203.
    PubMedDirect Link
  2. Polis, G.A., 1990. The Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, ISBN-13: 9780804712491, Pages: 587.
  3. Dehghani, R. and F. Kamiabi, 2017. Frequency of Odonthubutus doriae Thorell 1876 nests in desert soils, Esfahan, Iran. J. Entomol. Res., 41: 13-18.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  4. Sanaei-Zadeh, H., S.M. Marashi and R. Dehghani, 2017. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of scorpionism in Shiraz (2012-2016); development of a clinical severity grading for Iranian scorpion envenomation. Med. J. Islamic Republic Iran, Vol. 31.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  5. Keegan, H.L., 1980. Scorpion of Medical Importance. University Press of Mississipi, Mississippi, pp: 140.
  6. Dehghani, R., R. Valizade and S. Mahmoodi, 2016. A review of the scorpion predators and the introduction of Scarites subterraneus, as a new predatory of them in Iran. J. Ent. Res., 40: 291-296.
    Direct Link
  7. Ahmadimarzale, M., H. Sabuhi, M.S. Bidgoli, R. Dehghani, G. Hoseindoost and L. Mesgari, 2017. Study of scorpion species abundance in cities Aran & Bidgol and Kashan, Isfahan, Iran. J. Entomol. Res., 41: 337-342.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  8. Dehghani, R. and M.G. Arani, 2015. Scorpion sting prevention and treatment in ancient Iran. J. Tradit. Complement. Med., 5: 75-80.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  9. Dehghani, R., S. Moabed, F. Kamyabi, A.A. Haghdoost, M. Mashayekhi and H. Soltani, 2008. Scorpions fauna of Kerman province-Iran. J. Kerman Univ. Med. Sci., 15: 172-181.
    Direct Link
  10. Bentur, Y., U. Taitelman and A. Aloufy, 2003. Evaluation of scorpion stings: The poison center perspective. Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 45: 108-111.
    Direct Link
  11. Touloun, O., T. Slimani and A. Boumezzough, 2001. Epidemiological survey of scorpion envenomation in Southwestern Morocco. J. Venom. Anim. Toxin., 7: 199-218.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  12. Bosnak, M., A. Ece, I. Yolbas, V. Bosnak, M. Kaplan and F. Gurkan, 2009. Scorpion sting envenomation in children in Southeast Turkey. Wilderness Environ. Med., 20: 118-124.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  13. De Sousa, L., P. Parrilla-Alvarez and M. Quiroga, 2000. An epidemiological review of scorpion stings in Venezuela: the Northeastern region. J. Venomous Anim. Toxins, 6: 128-166.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  14. Prendini, L., 2001. Further additions to the scorpion fauna of Trinidad and Tobago. J. Arachnol., 29: 173-188.
    Direct Link
  15. Zhao, Z.L., T. Shu and X.Q. Feng, 2016. Study of biomechanical, anatomical and physiological properties of scorpion stingers for developing biomimetic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 58: 1112-1121.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  16. Chippaux, J.P. and M. Goyffon, 2008. Epidemiology of scorpionism: A global appraisal. Acta Tropica, 107: 71-79.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  17. Haghi, F.M. and R. Dehghani, 2017. A review of scorpions reported in Iran. J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci., 27: 213-226, (In Persian).
    Direct Link
  18. Dehghani, R., F. Kamiabi and M. Mohammadi, 2018. Scorpionism by Hemiscorpius spp. in Iran: A review. J. Venomous Anim. Toxins Including Trop. Dis., Vol. 24, No. 1.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  19. Dehghni, R., B. Vazirianzadeh, M.R. Nasrabadi and S.A. Moravvej, 2010. Study of scorpionism in Kashan in central of Iran. Pak. J. Med. Sci., 26: 955-958.
    Direct Link
  20. Dehghani, R., N.D. Djadid, D. Shahbazzadeh and S. Bigdelli, 2009. Introducing Compsobuthus matthiesseni (Birula, 1905) scorpion as one of the major stinging scorpions in Khuzestan, Iran. Toxicon, 54: 272-275.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  21. Ghafourian, M., N. Ganjalikhanhakemi, A.A. Hemmati, R. Dehghani and W. Kooti, 2016. The effect of Hemiscorpius lepturus (Scorpionida: Hemiscorpiidae) venom on leukocytes and the leukocyte subgroups in peripheral blood of rat. J. Arthropod Borne Dis., 10: 159-167.
    Direct Link
  22. Shahbazzadeh, D., A. Amirkhani, N.D. Djadid, S. Bigdeli and A. Akbari et al., 2009. Epidemiological and clinical survey of scorpionism in Khuzestan province, Iran (2003). Toxicon, 53: 454-459.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  23. Mogaddam, M.Y., R. Dehghani, A.A. Enayati, M. Fazeli-Dinan and F.M. Haghi, 2016. Epidemiology of scorpionism in Darmian, Iran, 2015. J. Mazandaran Univ. Med. Sci., 26: 131-136, (In Persian).
    Direct Link
  24. Dehghani, R. and B. Fathi, 2012. Scorpion sting in Iran: A review. Toxicon, 60: 919-933.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  25. Dehghani, R. and H. Kassiri, 2017. Geographical distribution of scorpion Odontobuthus doriae in Isfahan Province, central Iran. J. Arthropod Borne Dis., 11: 433-440.
    Direct Link
  26. Warburg, M.R., 2011. Scorpion reproductive strategies, allocation and potential; a partial review. Eur. J. Entomol., 108: 173-181.
    Direct Link
  27. Outeda-Jorge, S., R. Pinto-da-Rocha and T. Mello, 2009. Litter size, effects of maternal body size and date of birth in South American scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Zoologia, 26: 43-53.
    Direct Link
  28. Farzanpey, R., 1987. Recognition Scorpions. Central University Publications, Tehran, pp: 231, (In Persian, with Latin Index).
  29. Dehghani, R., F. Kamiabi and N. Mohammadzadeh, 2017. Burrowing habits of two Arthropods; Odenthobutus doriae and Hemilepistus schirasi in desert of Isfahan, Iran. J. Entomol. Res., 41: 113-118.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  30. Francke, O.F., 1981. Birth behavior and life history of Diplocentrus spitzeri Stahnke (Scorpiones: Diplocentridae). Southwestern Naturalist, 25: 517-523.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  31. Williams, S.C., 1987. Scorpion bionomics. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 32: 275-295.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  32. Lourenco, W.R., V. Andrzejewski and J.L. Cloudsley-Thompson, 2003. The life history of Chactas reticulates Kraepelin, 1912 (Scorpiones, Chactidae), with a comparative analysis of the reproductive traits of three scorpion lineages in relation to habitat. Zoologischer Anzeiger-J. Compa. Zool., 242: 63-74.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  33. Kamali, K., 1984. Introduce of importance scorpions in Khuzestan. J. Sci. Agric. Ahvaz Chameran Univ., 1: 34-34.
  34. Brown, C.A., 2004. Life histories of four species of scorpion in three families (Buthidae, Diplocentridae, Vaejovidae) from Arizona and New Mexico. J. Arachnol., 32: 193-207.
    Direct Link
  35. Warburg, M.R. and R. Elias, 1998. The reproductive potential and strategy of Scorpio maurus fuscus (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae): Anatomical clues in the ovariuterus. J. Zool., 246: 29-37.
    Direct Link
  36. Fischer, M.L. and J. Vasconcellos-Neto, 2005. Parameters affecting fecundity of Loxosceles intermedia Mello-Leitao 1934 (Araneae, Sicariidae). J. Arachnol., 33: 670-680.
    Direct Link
  37. Von Eickstedt, V.R.D., L.A. Ribeiro, D.M. Candido, M.J. Albuquerque and M.T. Jorge, 1996. Evolution of scorpionism by Tityus bahiensis (Perty) and Tityus serrulatus Lutz and Mello and geographical distribution of the two species in the state of Sao Paulo-Brazil. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins, 2: 92-105.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  38. Dehghani, R., T. Khamehchian and M.B. Miranzadeh, 2007. Surveying on the biologic behaviors of hemiscorpius lepturus peters 1861, scorpion in laboratory (Khuzestan, Iran) (Scorpions: Hemiscorpiidae). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 3097-3102.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  39. Polis, G.A., 1980. The effect of cannibalism on the demography and activity of a natural population of desert scorpions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 7: 25-35.
    Direct Link
  40. Matthiesen, F.A., 1970. Reproductive system and embryos of Brazilian scorpions. Acad. Brasil. Cienc. An., 42: 627-632.
    Direct Link
  41. Sarmento, S.M.N., A.M. de Souza, M.V. Meiado and C.M.R. de Albuquerque, 2008. Notes on the life history traits of Rhopalus rochai (Scorpiones, Buthidae) under different feeding regimes. J. Arachnol., 36: 476-479.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *