Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References
Research Article
 

Population Structure and Mobility of the Scarce Copper Lycaena virgaureae in the Herb Meadow Habitat of Northern Mongolia



K.K. Barua, G. Chuluunbaatar and M. Muehlenberg
 
ABSTRACT

In the present study we aimed to investigate the population size and the dispersal ability of a common species Lycaena virgaurea within a natural herb meadow habitat in Northern Mongolia. Mark-release-recapture experiments were conducted during a 24 days study period between end of July and August in 2004. The total population size was estimated to be 2880 individuals and estimates of male and female populations showed no significant differences from a 1:1 ratio. Out of the 38.68% of all the marked individuals that were recaptured during the specified study period, the percentage of males recaptured atleast once were higher than those of the recaptured females (19.59:11.08). Mean distances moved between subsequent recaptures were significantly different for both the sexes (ANOVA, F (1,31) = 18.60; p<0.001). Mean distance between two successive captures in males and females were 141±129 and 89±85 m, respectively. The mean maximum distance moved by females was 705 m and by males was 633 m. The overall results indicated the restricted dispersal ability of the Scarce Copper (Lycaena virgaureae) within the study area inspite of large open populations of Lycaena virgaureae being supported within the natural landscape.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

K.K. Barua, G. Chuluunbaatar and M. Muehlenberg, 2011. Population Structure and Mobility of the Scarce Copper Lycaena virgaureae in the Herb Meadow Habitat of Northern Mongolia. Journal of Entomology, 8: 40-51.

DOI: 10.3923/je.2011.40.51

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=je.2011.40.51
 
Received: March 01, 2010; Accepted: May 21, 2010; Published: July 17, 2010

INTRODUCTION

Features of landscapes are the most important predictors of population and community ecology of species (Hunter, 2002; Tews et al., 2004). Most of the previous studies on butterfly ecology have attributed declining patch occupancy and increasing threat to survival to progressive habitat fragmentation. In addition, the extinction risk increased significantly with decreasing heterozygosity (Saccheri et al., 1998) and followed widespread destruction of the habitat (Pullin, 1997). In contrast to such features in Europe, Mongolia which is a landlocked country in the heart of Central Asia, still has some of the most intact ecosystems in the entire region of the Palaearctic zone. Geographically Mongolia is a relatively unbroken area between Siberia and China, but on the same latitude as parts of Central Europe and Northern United States. The Mongolian territory includes several natural zones like taiga forest, mountain forest steppe, meadow steppe and desert.

The Khan Khentey region in Northern Mongolia is one of the three core conservation zones within the ‘Strictly Protected Area’ of the Khentey mountain range. It covers an area of 12271 km2 and is also known to be one out of the five different geographic regions in Mongolia’s Northern forests. In the Khentey region the Western Siberian dark taiga forests with Picea obovata, Abies sibirica, Pinus sibirica and Larix sibirica meet the Eastern Siberian light taiga forests comprising of Betula platyphylla and related species, Larix sp. and Pinus sylvestris (Ermakov et al., 2002). Mongolia’s forest-steppe zone forms the transition between the closed forests of the Siberian mountain taiga in the north and the steppe in the South. The Khentey region has this forest steppe zone with a high species richness due to the mixture of boreal, temperate and Daurian elements. The forest-steppe of the Khentey region is unique in the zonation from true Siberian taiga into the Daurian steppe with a mixture of dark taiga, light taiga and forest steppe vegetation types (Dulamsuren et al., 2005). This region is also a biodiversity hotspot in Mongolia (Muehlenberg and Samiya, 2002). The West Khentey region is known to harbour a particularly high plant diversity with dominant dark taiga species including Abies sibirica and Picea obovata (Tsedendash, 1995). A very high vascular plant diversity has also been reported in this region (Dulamsuren and Muehlenberg, 2003; Dulamsuren et al., 2004).

The butterfly fauna of Mongolia is known to be represented by 253 species but there are no endemic species (Korshunov and Gorbunov, 1995; Muehlenberg et al., 2003) although some new records are also likely to be reported from the southern range of the Mongolian Altai (Churkin and Tuzov, 2003). Six species from the family Papilionidae are listed in the Mongolian Red Data Book (Shiirevdamba et al., 1997). The butterfly fauna of the West Khentey region represents 60% of the total Mongolian fauna (Monkhbayar, 1999; Korshunov and Gorbunov, 1995). This butterfly community can be classified into four biogeographic categories with the largest representation by the palaearctic group (Muehlenberg et al., 2000; Gantigmaa, 2005 ). These species are known to be typical for taiga forest, woodland and grassland biotopes and steppes. The West Khentey is considered to be of high conservation value because amongst the diverse flora and fauna, there are many species which are endangered or threatened elsewhere but are common in this region. The Scarce Copper Lycaena vigaureae is one such example which is threatened in Europe but large open populations are known to exist in the West Khentey region (Gantigmaa, 2005).

Lycaena vigaureae is a typical grassland butterfly and has been listed as a very common species in West Khentey (Korshunov, 1977) This butterfly is widely distributed in Europe, Middle Asia and Mongolia (Tolman and Lewington, 1998). This species has declined in many parts of Europe (Ebert, 1993) and has been listed as vulnerable in Germany (Bundesamt fuer Naturschutz, 1998). It was documented in the Red Data Book of European Butterflies as lower risk, near threatened (Van Swaay and Warren, 1999). The characteristic natural habitats of Lycaena virgaureae are forest-open area-corridors, forest meadow, tree lines, forest edge and dry grasslands (Settele et al., 1999) and tall herb communities, mesophile grassland, mixed woodland, broad-leaved deciduous forest and coniferous woodland (Van Swaay and Warren, 1999). In West Khentey, this species occurs in all kinds of biotope ranging from mesophile grasslands, dry slopes and flower rich meadows to forest clearings, forest margins and forest mantel (Gantigmaa, 2005). It is univoltine with adults usually flying from mid June to late August. Within the Asian part of Russia, it flies from late June until August (Settele et al., 1999) and in North-western Europe, in one generation between July and August (Schneider et al., 2003).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: Our study area was located on a herb meadow at an elevation of 960 m above MSL in western Khentey region of north Mongolia (Fig. 1). The West Khentey belongs to the Euroasiatic-Boreal-Forest region and is a sub-region of the East Siberian Larix-Pinus sylvestris forest zone of Khentey mountain taiga (NAM, 1990).

The forest structure in West Khentey region represents climax coniferous forests only in some patches, because fire causes mixed forest of variable succesional stages, such that the boreal coniferous forests are of high structural diversity and spatial heterogeneity due to the natural disturbances (Gunin et al., 1999; Goldammer and Furyaev, 1996). The river valley demarcates the hilly terrain characteristic of this region. This natural landscape includes grasslands (e.g., mountain dry steppe, meadow steppe, herb meadow, wet grassland dominated by Carex sp., peat meadow), the riparian woodland (e.g., dense Betula fusca shrubland with Salix sp., open riparian forest with Larix sibirica and Betula platyphylla as shrub layer, Picea obovata and Populus laurifolia dominated riparian forests (Dulamsuren, 2004).

Muehlenberg et al. (2000) described eight different types of vegetation in the West Khentey region: mountain taiga, mountain forest, meadow steppe, mountain dry steppe, shrub land, riparian woodland, herb meadows and wet grasslands. Typical habitats in West Khentey region are coniferous and deciduous forests with open areas of herbaceous plant meadows and meadow steppes on the terraces in the river valley, while at higher elevations there is a transition to xerophytic herbaceous communities on the southern slopes. Riparian woodlands and open riparian forests with Larix sibirica and Betula platyphylla are found in the river valleys. Grasslands with hygrophytic vegetation exist on the river terraces while xerophytic grassland habitats are found on the dry southern slopes.

The study site was a c.a 7 ha meadow in the river valley terrace. This site was specifically chosen due to the availability of many flowering plants and hence plenty of adult nectar resources. One of the important characteristics of this selected site was the vast expanse of natural, open areas bordered by different forest types on one side and the river on the other side (Fig. 1).

Study period: The entire study was conducted in the year 2004, extending over a one month period from end of July until end of August.

Movement patterns of adults: The movement patterns of Lycaena virgaureae was investigated from late July until end of August in 2004 at one open herb meadow habitat of West Khentey in northern Mongolia. During a four hour sampling per day under good weather conditions, two surveyors walked on foot and netted all individuals encountered. One person marked every captured individual and released it immediately at the place of capture. The exact GPS position of all individuals recorded during the mark-release-recapture study was plotted on a map, in order to get a measure of distances moved between subsequent captures. The second surveyor made a record of the date of capture, sex of the captured individuals, number of marked and released individuals and the GPS positions of the capture locations for each sampling day on the data sheet. Emigration and immigration patterns for the sampled population were not examined in detail.

Adult population size: The population size was estimated in 2004 for a period of 24 days by a mark-release- recapture study. During the flight period, the study site was visited daily under permissible weather conditions, between 11.00 and 15.00 h, from the end of July until the end of August. Sampling was not done on days when it was raining. On certain sampling days with very windy conditions prevailing, the observation hours could be shorter than the four hours sampling per day regime. Each adult caught was marked individually on the hind wing, using a fine-tipped permanent ink pen and released immediately at the place of capture. The sampling data was used to estimate the sex ratio. The analyses were performed by aggregating the sampling dates and dividing the entire survey period into three discrete sections, with an approximately equal time interval of 9-10 days.


Fig. 1: Location of the study area in Mongolia. The Khentey is the southern extension of the Siberian taiga system. This region consists of a high mountain belt, a forest belt, forest-steppe and meadow steppe. The study site consisted of c. 10 ha area along the Eroo river and was located at 960 m above MSL on a herb meadow habitat in West Khentey. The coloured points indicate the distribution of some of the flowering plants within the study area

Daily population estimates were calculated using the Jolly-Seber method (Krebs, 1998). Male and female population sizes were calculated by plotting the daily estimates obtained from the Jolly method. The overall population size was estimated by the Petersen method (Krebs, 2001).

Statistical tests: Statistical tests like the One-Way ANOVA for estimating the movement parameters were analysed in the program STATISTICA 7.1 (StatSoft, 1995).

RESULTS

Mark-release-recapture data: A total of 1345 individuals (758 females, 587 males) were marked during the nearly one month mark-release-recapture study period. 38.68% of all the marked individuals were recaptured within 4 weeks. 19.59% of males and 11.08% of females were recaptured at least once (Table 1). The maximum time interval between mark and recapture was 24 days for males and 22 days for females.

Movement of adults: Throughout the 24 days period, the mean distance moved by females in herb meadow was greater than the distance covered by the males. Most of the marked adults were recaptured from sites located nearby to their place of first capture (Fig. 2).

Our observations from Fig. 2 showed that the movement patterns of a majority of Lycaena virgaureae individuals were restricted to fairly small areas within the open landscape although there were no natural borders or barriers limiting their movements. For example, an individual marked by the symbol () was recaptured four times after the first release, but the total distance covered by this individual within the sampling period was only 56 m.

The distances moved between subsequent recaptures were significantly different for both sexes (male n = 150, mean 118±113 m, female n = 100, mean 163±143 m; ANOVA, F (1,248) = 7.75; p<0.005) (Table 2).


Table 1: The recapture records of Lycaena virgaureae in the herb meadow habitat of West Khentey. The survey was carried out between 25th of July-25th of August, 2004
n = No. of individuals recaptured

Table 2: The mean distance moved by Lycaena virgaureae individuals (both sexes) between subsequent recaptures during the 24 days sampling period
SD: Standard deviation, *Significant

Fig. 2: Map showing the distribution of Lycaena virgaureae in one habitat type. Butterflies were recorded in an open herb meadow. Each type of symbol indicates the GPS position of a different captured individual for each sampling day within the study site

Mean distance between two successive captures was significantly different (ANOVA, F (1,31) = 18.60; p<0.001) for both the sexes (141±129 m for females; 89±85 m for males). For the time interval between subsequent recaptures, mean distances moved by females was greater than that moved by the males (Table 2). The females moved at a constant rate whereas males increased their distance in time between recaptures (for males 91±75 m at short intervals compared with 190±140 m at longer intervals recaptured after more than 10 days; ANOVA, F (1,38) = 9.12; p<0.004). The mean distances moved by females was not significantly different (ANOVA, F (1,38) =2.74; p<0.1) between time intervals. The greatest distance between recaptures was 705 m for females and 633 m for males. Marked individuals moved freely throughout the mark-recapture circuit, but females had moved much farther than the males when recaptured within different time intervals (Fig. 1). However our overall mark-release- recapture results showed significant differences between mean distances moved by males and females (Table 2). Fifty one percent of the linear distances moved by Lycaena virgaureae were more than 100 m and 29% were found to be less than 50 m. The mean distances between first and last recapture was not significantly different for both sexes (149±133 m for females; 104±71 m for males; ANOVA F (1,28) = 1.30; p<0.26). However, the overall mean distances moved by Lycaena virgaureae was significantly different for the different times of recapture. The maximum range was calculated for individuals that were captured for three or more times (174±117 m for males and 388±287 m for females).

The total distance covered by Lycaena virgaureae was significantly higher than the distance between the first and last recapture (ANOVA, F (1,98) =12.20; p<0.0007). This could be considered to indicate that Lycaena virgaureae was more or less confined in its habitat within a restricted area range.

Adult population size: The adult counts of Lycaena virgaureae indicated that the males not only emerged earlier but were also captured more frequently than the females. The individual counts for the males could reach a higher value even much before a single adult female was first encountered. The estimated population size was not significantly different between the sexes (ANOVA, F (1,46) = 3.24; p<0.07) throughout the entire sampling period which also covered their flight period, but males were found to appear earlier and the females were found to stay longer in the habitat (Fig. 3).

The estimates of male and female populations suggested a slight preponderance of females, but statistical examination showed no significant differences from a 1:1 ratio. The estimated total population in the study site was 2880 (recapture calculation by the Petersen method). Although the Scarce Copper is known to fly in West Khentey for one generation between middle of July till end of August, however our results showed that the highest abundance was recorded around the beginning of August (Fig. 3). The total numbers of individuals which were recorded between 02-08 August were approximately representing 30% of all captured individuals.

During the survey period of Lycaena virgaureae, the population size of males was found to be dominant in the end of July and most of the males were observed to be visiting Achillea asiatica, Potentilla fragarioides and Aster tataricus. Forty six percent (n = 761) of all the butterflies were captured from the feeding plants. The most preferred nectar source was Achillea asiatica (25% of total number of captured individuals were using this plant). The majority of the males (59% as compared to 49% for females) were either in flight or perched on vegetation at the time of encounter. Estimated size of one population during peak flight period ranged between 842 and 2358 individuals. The estimated density was 0.047 individuals m-2.


Fig. 3: Estimated population size of Lycaena virgaureae recorded between 25th July and 25th August, 2004. Daily change in the size of the adult population is estimated by the Jolly-Seber method

DISCUSSION

Movements of adults: Butterfly communities which inhabit natural landscapes are thought to be more mobile than those inhabiting human dominated, fragmented landscapes (Bergman et al., 2004). In this present study, the mobility of Lycaena virgaureae was studied in a natural open landscape having a rich herb vegetation cover in Northern Mongolia. Present results supported previous studies which reported that the proportion of recapture was higher for males than females (recapture ratio of 26:13%) as their mobility was found to be more restricted in comparison to that of the females (Brakefield, 1982; Pullin, 1997; Fischer et al., 1999). A similar result was also detected in the population studies on Boloria eunomia (Mennechez et al., 2003). The overall low recapture rate of Lycaena virgaureae could be attributed to their greater dispersal ability. However, another factor affecting their low recapture frequency could be the configuration of the study sites (Fischer et al., 1999; Schneider et al., 2003) and the sampling intensity (Auckland et al., 2004). Present results on the dispersal parameters for both the sexes showed that the mean movement distances for males was 118±113 m and for females was 163±143 m. This implied that the females exhibited greater dispersal ability in comparison to the males.

Mean distance movement values for Lycaena virgaureae recorded in our present study could be comparable to those reported in other studies although there were differences in the size of the study area (Schneider et al., 2003). However, the overall adult movement patterns could be considered to be limited as our results showed the maximum distance range for males was 633 m and for females was 705 m. Therefore, we could consider our results to be contradictory to the findings of Schneider et al., 2003 where the Scarce Copper showed much greater movement ability than expected from the results of previous studies although the comparatively large size of the study area was a crucial determining factor irrespective of the high cover of suitable habitat which was also evident in our study. These findings are supported by Mennechez et al. (2003), who concluded that the butterflies moved larger distances in fragmented landscape than in a continuous system of undisturbed landscape. Habitat suitability as another important factor influencing the dispersal ability of the adults can be cited from the findings of Shreeve (1992) who observed that the area occupied by a population must consist of habitats which fulfill the adults' functional categories such as mating, egg-laying and foraging. Similar observations on habitat quality as an important factor that drives the distribution of butterfly species were reported by Hanski (1999) and Thomas et al. (2001). In this study area, the existence of undisturbed grassland habitats across the natural landscape of West Khentey could have been a very favourable condition not only for supporting the Scarce Copper population but also for restricting their movements within the habitat. While many Palaearctic butterfly species are known to be specialised in only one habitat type within fragmented landscapes long distance movements across several habitat patches has also been reported to be crucial in determining the persistence of some species in highly fragmented landscapes (Baguette et al., 2003; Bergman, 2001; Pullin, 1997).

In our study within a natural landscape, the overall percentage of recapture (38.68%) was higher as compared to a 29% recapture rate in intensively used semi-natural grasslands (Schneider et al., 2003). This result can be considered to give support to the fact that the adult mobility was not so much restricted as unlike in a disturbed landscape where it was observed that some individuals belonging to very sedentary species could move over larger distances but such individuals usually showed no predictable direction in their movements and majority of them even did not attempt to return to their original habitat (Shreeve, 1992). So we could consider our investigations to be important in representing the differences in movements patterns of the same Palaearctic species (Lycaena virgaureae) but from two different types of landscape (Schneider et al., 2003; Douwes, 1975).

Our investigations clearly indicated the lower movement ability of the Scarce Copper within the natural landscape of Mongolia as compared to the higher movement ability of the same species within the fragmented and human dominated landscape in Europe.

Adult population size: In our present study we tried to investigate the role of nectar plants availability in naturally open habitats and how it could influence the adult population size of Lycaena virgaureae. This species could be categorised as commonly available in the West Khentey region as results from previous studies have reported on the existence of large open populations (Gantigmaa, 2005). Most individuals of many species appear to stay within a relatively small area called the home range. However, all those individuals must have particular living space (e.g., space with available resources for their life) in order to coexist within a community (Porter et al., 1992). Despite their ability to fly, most adult butterflies tend to stay within specialised microhabitats where the resources (adult nectar and larval hostplants) are abundant (Warren, 1992).

The population size of Lycaena virgaureae might be affected by the availability of its nectar plant. Our field observations showed a positive correlation between the female population size of Lycaena virgaureae and the abundance of its foodplants Achillea asiatica and Aster tataricus, but males were significantly correlated with Potentilla fragarioides (Douwes, 1975). This may be interpreted as the effect of flowering phenology of the nectar plants or palatability of those plants. The peak flowering period of Potentilla fragarioides is in July (Qin et al., 2003). The sex ratio of Lycaena virgaureae had changed over time, with males emerging earlier during the flight period and females emerging two weeks after that of the first appearance of males. Males were commonly found basking on the vegetation, whereas females were observed mostly during flight.

This study was the first of its kind in the West Khentey region of Mongolia for investigation on the population structure of a butterfly species within a very natural landscape with least human disturbance. This Palaearctic species being near threatened in Europe was selected as a model for our studies and we found a comparatively higher mobility of the existing population within our study area although on a relatively smaller scale. Our present investigations can have a lot of implications for future studies on population biology and other ecological aspects of the butterfly fauna in West Khentey.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was granted by DFG (German Research Foundation, Grant No. GK 642), within the Graduating Colleague Programme Biodiversity. We are grateful for their support. The Centre for Nature Conservation, University of Göttingen, Germany and the National University of Mongolia provided field facilities. We are grateful to D. Myagmarsuren and A. Enkhmaa, for helping us with data collection in the field, especially with the mark-release-recapture study.

REFERENCES
Auckland, J.N., D.M. Debinski and W.R. Clark, 2004. Survival, movement and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius. Ecol., Entomol., 29: 139-149.
CrossRef  |  

Baguette, M., G. Mennechez, S. Petit and N. Schtickzelle, 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. C. R. Biol., 326: S200-S209.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Bergman, K.O., 2001. Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine. J. Applied Ecol., 38: 1303-1313.
Direct Link  |  

Bergman, K.O., J. Askling, O. Ekberg, H. Ignell, H. Wahlman and P. Milberg, 2004. Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography, 27: 619-628.
Direct Link  |  

Brakefield, P.M., 1982. Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. I. Adult behaviour, microdistribution and dispersal. J. Anim. Ecol., 51: 713-726.
Direct Link  |  

Bundesamt fuer Naturschutz, 1998. Rote liste gefahrdeter tiere deutschlands. Schriftenreihe Naturschutz. Heft 55, BfN, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, pp: 434. http://www.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/tocs/5946741X.pdf.

Churkin, S.V. and V.K. Tuzov, 2003. Helois: Collection of Lepidopterological Articles. Vol. 4, Khronos-Press, Moscow, pp: 349.

Douwes, P., 1975. Distribution of a population of the butterfly Heodes virgaureae. Oikos, 26: 332-340.
Direct Link  |  

Dulamsuren, C. and M. Muehlenberg, 2003. Additions to the flora of the Khentii, Mongolia. Willdenowia, 33: 149-158.
Direct Link  |  

Dulamsuren, C., 2004. Floristische diversitat, vegetation und standortbedingungen in der gebirgstaiga des westkhentey, nordmongolei. Ph.D. Thesis, Dissertation in Biology, University of Gottingen.

Dulamsuren, C., M. Hauck and M. Muehlenberg, 2005. Vegetation at the taiga forest-steppe borderline in the western Khentej Mountains, Northern Mongolia. Ann. Bot. Fennici, 42: 411-426.

Dulamsuren, C., R.V. Kamelin , N.N. Cyelev , M. Hauck and M. Muehlenberg, 2004. Additions to the flora of the Khentej, Mongolia, 2. Willdenowia, 34: 505-510.
Direct Link  |  

Ebert, G., 1993. Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Wurttembergs. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, German, ISBN: 3-440-09641-6.

Ermakov, N., M. Cherosov and P. Gogoleva, 2002. Classification of ultra-continental boreal forests in central Yakutia. Folia Geobot., 37: 419-440.
Direct Link  |  

Fischer, K., B. Beinlich and H. Plachter, 1999. Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera; Lycaenidae) in West Germany: Implications for conservation. J. Insect Conserv., 3: 43-52.
CrossRef  |  

Gantigmaa, C., 2005. Butterfly communities in the natural landscape of West Khentej, northern Mongolia: Diversity and conservation value. Ph.D. Thesis, Dissertation in Biology, University of Gottingen.

Goldammer, J.G. and V.V. Furyaev, 1996. Fire in Ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, ISBN: 0-7923-4137-6, pp: 528.

Gunin, D.P., A.E. Vostokova, I.N. Dorofeyuk, E.P. Tarasov and C.C. Black, 1999. Vegetation Dynamics of Mongolia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp: 238.

Hanski, I., 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, USA., ISBN: 0-19-854065-5.

Hunter, M.D., 2002. Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation and the ecology of insects. Agric. Forest Entomol., 4: 159-166.
CrossRef  |  

Korshunov, J.P. and P. Gorbunov, 1995. Diurnal butterflies of Asian part of Russian. Ekateringburg, Russia, PP: 202.

Korshunov, J.P., 1977. Diurnal butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of the mongolian people`s republic II. Insects Mongol., 5: 649-681.

Krebs, C.J., 1998. Ecological Methodology. 2nd Edn., Harper Collins, New York, ISBN: 978-0-321-02173-1, pp: 654.

Krebs, C.J., 2001. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. 5th Edn., Benjamin Cummings, an imprint of Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., USA., ISBN: 978-0-321-06879-8, pp: 695.

Mennechez, G., N. Schtickzelle and B. Baguette, 2003. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: Comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol., 18: 279-291.
CrossRef  |  

Monkhbayar, K., 1999. Some results of the species composition and ecology of lepidopterous (Rhopalocera) of the Bohd Khan Uul. Masters Dissertation, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolian State University.

Muehlenberg, M. and R. Samiya, 2002. High biodiversity in boreal forest, a paradox to extreme conditions? A cooperative research at the university station of khonin nuga. Proceedings of International Conference on Biodiversity of Mongolia, (ICBM`02), Ulaanbaatar, pp: 53-56.

Muehlenberg, M., H. Hondong, C. Dulamsuren and K. V. Gadow, 2003. Large-Scale Biodiversity Research in the Southern Taiga, Northern Mongolia. In: Large-Scale Field Experiments, Creating a Legacy for Sustainable, Science-Based Forest Management, Peterson, C., K.V. Gadow and N. Krauchi (Eds.). IUFRO, California, pp: 119-142.

Muehlenberg, M., J. Slowik, R. Samja, C. Dulamsuren, C. Gantigmaa and M. Woycechowski, 2000. The conservation value of West Khentej, North Mongolia: Evaluation of plant and butterfly communities. Fragmenta Florist. Geobot., 45: 63-90.

NAM, 1990. National Atlas of Mongolia. Academy Press, Moscow.

Porter, K., C.A. Steel and J.A. Thomas, 1992. Butterflies and Communities. In: The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain, Dennis, R.L.H. (Ed.). Oxford Science Publication, Britain, pp: 354.

Pullin, A., 1997. Habitat requirements of Lycaena dispar batavus and implications for re-establishment in England. J. Insect Conserv., 1: 177-185.
CrossRef  |  

Qin, G., G. Du, Y. Luo, G.S. Dong and J.J. Ma, 2003. A re-examination of the relationships among phenological complementarity, species diversity and ecosystem function. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sci., 44: 239-244.
Direct Link  |  

Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius and I. Hanski, 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392: 491-494.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Schneider, C., J. Dover and L.A. Fry, 2003. Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: The role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecological Entomol., 28: 219-227.
CrossRef  |  

Settele, J., R. Feldmann and R. Reinhardt, 1999. Die Tagfalter Deutschlands. Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH and Co., Stuttgart, ISBN: 978-3-8001-4990-2, pp: 452.

Shiirevdamba, T., O. Shardarsuren, G. Erdenejav, T. Amagalam and T. Tsetsegmaa, 1997. Mongolian Red Data Book. Ministry for Nature and Environment of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, pp: 388.

Shreeve, T.G., 1992. Monitoring Butterfly Movements. In: The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain, Dennis, R.L.H. (Ed.). Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, ISBN-13: 978-0198540250, pp: 368.

StatSoft, 1995. Statistica for Windows (Computer Program, a Manual). StatSoft Inc., Tulsa.

Tews, J., U. Brose, V. Grimm, K. Tielborger and M.C. Wichmann et al., 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr., 31: 79-92.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Thomas, J.A., N.A.D. Bourn, R.T. Clarke, K.E. Stewart and D.J. Simcox et al., 2001. The quality and isolation of c persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. Royal Soc. London Biol. Sci., 268: 1791-1796.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tolman, T. and R. Lewington, 1998. Butterflies of Britain and Europe. Collins Field Guide Harper Collins Publishers, London, ISBN: 9780007242344, pp: 320.

Tsedendash, G., 1995. Khentein Nuruunii Oi-Urgamalshil [Forest vegetation of the Khentej Mountains]. National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, MG. (In Mongolian).

Van Swaay, C. and M. Warren, 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment, No. 99, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.

Warren, M.S., 1992. Butterfly Population. In: The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain, Dennis, R.L.H. (Ed.). Oxford Science Publication, UK., Oxford, pp: 354.

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract