• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Biological Sciences
  2. Vol 20 (2), 2020
  3. 73-79
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2020 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 73-79
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2020.73.79
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol

Gamal Eldin Aboul-Fotouh Gamal  Eldin Aboul-Fotouh's LiveDNA, Abdelkader M. Kholif Abdelkader  M. Kholif's LiveDNA, Abdelalim M. Abd El-Mola and Ola G.A. Hassan

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: Rising production of pomegranate juice causes to the gathering a novel by-product, i.e., pomegranate peel, which have attracted attention for their obvious wound-recovering characteristics. This paper aimed to evaluate the best percentage (%) addition of pomegranate peel (PP), detanninated pomegranate peel (DPP) and pomegranate peel with polyethylene glycol) (PP+PEG) on in vitro characteristics. Materials and Methods: The treatments were control has a total mixed ration consisted of concentrates feed mixture, Egyptian clover and wheat straw (2:1:1), from Ration 1 (R1) to R5 have control+PP, R6-R10 have control+DPP 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5% DPP, respectively, finally R11-R15 have control+PP with 20 g PEG. The experimental rations were incubated in vitro with rumen liquor for 24 h and the amount of the production of gas has been measured. Results: The findings demonstrated that the dry matter digestibility in R11, R12, R13 and R6 were the highest insignificant. The gas production volume values were highly significant of R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) supplementation demonstrated the highest significant impact on organic matter digestibility (OMD), short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), metabolisable energy (ME) and net energy for lactation (NEL) between the experimental rations. Addition the PEG for both 1, 2 and 3% pomegranate peel and utilized 1% detanninated pomegranate peel raised dry matter digestibility (DMD), OMD and could utilize them as ruminants feed supplement full of a valuable nutritional element at an awfully low expense. Conclusion: Pomegranate peel+polyethylene glycol (PEG) and detanninated pomegranate peel have a possibility relative nutritive value in farm animals under the condition of in vitro studies.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: December 09, 2019;   Accepted: January 16, 2020;   Published: February 15, 2020
Copyright: © 2020. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How to cite this article

Gamal Eldin Aboul-Fotouh, Abdelkader M. Kholif, Abdelalim M. Abd El-Mola and Ola G.A. Hassan, 2020. In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol. Journal of Biological Sciences, 20: 73-79.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2020.73.79

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2020.73.79

INTRODUCTION


Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) has been cultivated all over in tropical and subtropical areas including Iraq, Iran, California, Turkey, Egypt, Italy, India, Chile and Spain1. Pomegranate fruit has consisted of only three components: the seeds, which represents 3% of weight of the fruit; the fruit drink, which represents 30% of the fruit weight and peels, that involves husk and internal membranes. Pomegranate peels are vanished after producing juice and becoming equipped to eat2. Rising production of pomegranate juice causes to the gathering a novel by-product, i.e., pomegranate peel.

Pomegranate peels consist of an enormous number of polyphenols1. Pomegranate peel parts have attracted attention for their obvious wound-recovering characteristics3, immunomodulatory activity4, antibacterial activity5 and antiatherosclerotic and antioxidative capacities6.

Tannins are high molecular weight phenolic component, that exists in numerous plants, including pomegranate fruit and by-product. Shabtay et al.7 indicated that utilizing pomegranate peel up to 20% in calves diet has negative effect on fattening performance and consequently average daily gain were increased.

Low and moderate of condensed tannins in the diet (2-4.5%) have improved production effectiveness in ruminants, via raising the flow of non-ammonia nitrogen and essential amino acids from the rumen.

While polyphenolic compounds may improve animal health, they can reduce proteolytic activity, so in the current research, we utilized detanninated pomegranate peel and Polyethylene glycol (PEG), as a tannin-binding agent to reduce the impact of polyphenolic compounds.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) that binds tannins irreversibly, decreasing the adverse impacts of tannins on food intake8, digestibility9 and preferences10. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been successfully utilized for nutritional evaluation of condensed tannins (CT)-rich foods11. It has a high affinity for binding condensed tannins and preventing the formation of tannin-protein complexes. So, PEG raises the intake of high tannin forages by ruminants vi mitigating adverse impacts of tannins6,10,12. Salem et al.13 pointed that polyethylene glycol (PEG, mol. wt. 4000) inactivated acacia condensed tannins, thus improved microbial protein synthesis, acacia intake and digestion and growth of sheep. According to Decandia et al.14, the inactivation of tannins via PEG raised the availability of nutrients and reduced microbial inhibition, leading to raised degradability of nutrients and best animal performance.

The purpose of this research was to estimate the addition of pomegranate peel (PP), detanninated pomegranate peel (DPP) and pomegranate peel with polyethylene glycol (PEG) on in vitro gas production characteristics, dry matter digestibility (DMD), fiber fractions, pH, ammonia concentration (NH3N), organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolisable energy (ME), net energy for lactation (NEL) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) utilizing in vitro method of gas production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study area: This study was conducted at Dairy Science Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt during March to April, 2019.

Preparation of pomegranate peel: Dried pomegranate peels were acquired from the by-product unites in Fayoum, Egypt. Peels were crushed in a grinder to reduce it to coarse size peel. Detanninated pomegranate peel prepared according to Kushwaha et al.15, the prepared peel was percolated in distilled water (1:1 w/v) and kept at ambient condition for 12 h then whole material squeezed and filtered through muslin cloth and collecting solid residue leftover muslin cloth and were placed in a hot air oven at 60°C for 18 h to obtain dried material. The dried materials were crushed by food grinder into powder form up to completely pass through 0.5 mm size sieve. Both detanninated and dried pomegranate peel powder transferred in polyethylene bags for chemical analysis and in vitro gas production.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG): Polyethylene glycol 4000p produced by Chem-Lab NV, Industriezone ''De Arend'' 2, Belgium.

Chemical analysis: Dried and detanninated pomegranate peel powder were dried at 105°C and assayed for DM, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF) and Ash content according AOAC16. Nitrogen free extract (NFE) was calculated by subtracting the summation percentages of CP, EE and CF from organic matter (OM), while OM was calculated by subtracting the percentage of ash from one hundred. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and lignin17. The tannin contents were determined by Folin denis reagent as described by Makkar et al.18.

In vitro gas production: Batch fermentation culture experiment was conducted according to Ismail et al.19 to evaluate the effect of pomegranate peel, detanninated pomegranate peel and pomegranate peel+polyethylene glycolon rumen fermentation characteristics. A total mixed ration consisted of 50% concentrates feed mixture, 25% Egyptian clover and 25% wheat straw were used as a substrate. For obtaining of the rumen microorganisms (inoculum), rumen fluid was collected from the rumen of slaughtered rams fed berseem hay ration. The tested rations are in Table 1. Each tested rations were tested in 3 replicates accompanied by 3 blank vessels (no substrate). The tested rations (400 mg) were added separately to the 125 mL incubation vessels. Each vessel was filled with 40 mL of a mixture of 1:3 (v/v) rumen fluids: buffer solution (292 mg of K2HPO4·3H2O, 240 mg of KH2PO4, 480 mg of (NH4)2SO4, 480 mg of NaCl, 100 mg of MgSO4·7H2O, 64 mg of CaCl2·2H2O, 4 mg of Na2CO3 and 600 mg of cysteine hydrochloride per liter). All vessels were sealed and incubated at 39°C for 24 h. After 24 h of incubation, all vessels were filtered in fiber filter bags 25-micron porosity (ANKOM- USA). The residues in the bags were dried at 70°C in the oven for 48 h to analyze dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) digestibility. Rumen fluid pH was measured using (pH-meter). The overall volume of the produced gases was determined using Hohenheim Syringes (100 mL) as described by Navarro-Villa et al.20. Quantitative analysis of ammonia concentration was carried out by a modified Nessler’s method21.

Table 1: Formulation of the tested rations (on DM basis)
Image for - In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol
*Concentrates feed mixture, composed of 60% yellow corn, 20% soybean meal, 17.5% wheat bran, 1.5% limestone, 0.2% dicalcium phosphate, 0.3% premix and 0.5% NaCl, EC: Egyptian clover, WS: Wheat straw, PP: Pomegranate peel, DPP: Detanninated pomegranate peel, PEG: Polyethylene glycol

The short chain fatty acids (SCFA) concentration was calculated according to the equation of Makkar22. The ME, NEL and OMD of pomegranate peels were calculated using equations of Menke and Steingass23 as:

Metabolisable energy (ME) (MJ kg–1 DM) = 2.20+0.136×GP+0.0057×CP

Net energy for lactation (NEL) (MJ kg–1 DM) = 0.115×GP+0.0054×CP+0.014×EE-0.0054×CA-0.36

OMD (g kg–1 DM) = 14.88+0.889×GP+0.45×CP+0.0651×CA

where, GP is 24 h net gas production volume (mL/200 mg DM) and CP, EE, CA are crude protein, ether extract and crude ash (g kg–1 DM), respectively.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses were made via the general linear model procedure through SPSS24. Duncan test25 was carried out to separate among means.

RESULTS


Chemical composition: Data in Table 2 revealed that chemical composition of pomegranate peel and ingredients. The detanninated pomegranate peel (DPP) contained lower OM, EE, NFE and tannins compared with dried pomegranate peel (PP), while DPP recorded higher content of DM, CP, CF, NDF, ADF, ADL, hemicelluloses, cellulose and lignin than the dried Pomegranate peel’s values.

Table 2: Chemical composition of ingredients that used in the tested rations
Image for - In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol
CFM: Concentrates feed mixture, EC: Egyptian clover, WS: Wheat straw, PP: Pomegranate peel, DPP: Detanninated pomegranate peel, DM: Dry matter, OM: Organic matter, CP: Crude protein, EE: Ether extract, CF: Crude fiber, NFE: Nitrogen free extract, NDF: Neutral detergent fiber, ADF: Acid detergent fiber, ADL: Acid detergent lignin

Table 3: Gas production characteristics of the tested rations
Image for - In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol
Average in the same column having different superscripts are differ significantly (p<0.05), DMD: Dry matter digestibility, NDFD: Neutral detergent fiber digestibility, ADFD: Acid detergent fiber digestibility, GP: Gas production volume, NH3N: Ammonia concentration, SE: Standard error

Table 4: Parameters estimated of the tested rations
Image for - In vitro Rumen-fermentation and Gas Production of Pomegranate Peel with or Without Polyethylene Glycol
Average in the same column having different superscripts are differ significantly (p<0.05), OMD: Organic matter digestibility, SCFA: Short chain fatty acids, ME: Metabolisable energy, NEL: Net energy for lactation, SE: Standard error

In vitro gas production of experimental rations: Table 3 showed DMD, NDFD, ADFD, gas production (GP), pH, NH3N and calculated amounts of organic matter digestibility (OMD), GP volume, SCFA, ME and NEL of the tested rations. Dry matter digestibility in R11, R12, R13 and R6 was insignificantly higher than that of control. Also, R11 and R12 were the highest significant NDFD and ADFD. However, pH was significant highest of control and lowest for R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15. The PEG supplementation has the highest significant effect on GP, OMD, SCFA, ME and NEL between the tested rations.

Also, OMD, SCFA, ME and NEL showed in Table 4 organic matter digestibility recorded high significant values in R11, R12, R13, R14 and R15, respectively compared with the control ration and the same trend of SCFA, ME and NEL.

DISCUSSION


Chemical constituents of dried peels are nearly similar to the outcomes of Kushwaha et al.15 and Taher-Maddah et al.26 founded that CP, EE, ash, CF, NDF and ADF of PP were 3.95, 4.9, 5.49,12.61, 17.83 and 14.55%, respectively, Also Sadq et al.27 indicated that CP, EE, ash and CF of PP were 5.1, 4.9, 3.7 and 11.22% correspondingly. Some variations are founded between chemical compositions of PP in the present research in comparison to those shown by Mirzaei-Aghsaghali et al.28, Ebrahimi29 and Delavar et al.30. These variations in the chemical constitution of PP is possibly caused by dissimilar unique materials, growing conditions (geographic, seasonal differences, climatic changes and land properties) and the degree of unfamiliar materials, contaminations, differences, dissimilar processing and measuring systems.

Chemical compositions of DPP were in agreement with Kushwaha et al.15, which they reported that DM (17.63%), ash (3.29%), EE (1.43%), CP (6.43%), CF (24.36%), NDF (28.54%), ADF (26.11%) and lignin (7.59%). Higher chemical compositions in DPP than PP indicate retention and accumulation of the above compositions during the detannination process but in case of lower test values in DPP than PP indicated that losses of the above components during the detannination process.

Gas volume is a good scale from which to predict digestibility and microbial protein synthesis of the materials by rumen microbes in in vitro test31. It also have shown a close correlation with feed intake32 and the growth rate in cattle33. Kinetics of gas production is depended on at relative proportions of soluble, insoluble but degraded and undegradable materials of the feed34. Kamalak et al.35 found that total and soluble condensed tannins were negatively correlated with the volume of gas production. Gas production in the current research are consistent with those of Feizi et al.36 who reported that pomegranate peel tannins had a negative effect on in vitro fermentation. Besharati and Ghezeljeh37 reported that increased gas production with addition of PEG to pomegranate seed34,38-40. Pomegranate peel is rich in tannins41 and tannins bind to the protein and reduce the accessibility of proteins to rumen microorganisms, so in our study, we used DPP and added polyethylene glycol to decreased effect of tannins on intake, digestion and animal performance. Tannins have both detrimental and beneficial effects in ruminant animals, which high concentrations of tannins may decrease intake, digestibility of protein and carbohydrates and then animal performance through their negative effect on digestion42. By preventing bloat and increasing the flow of non-ammonia nitrogen and essential amino acids from the rumen43, while low and moderate (20-45 mg g–1 DM) concentrations of condensed tannins in the diet improved production efficiency in ruminants, without increasing feed intake7. The increase in gas production in the presence of PEG is possibly due to an increase in the available nutrients to rumen micro-organisms, especially the available nitrogen.

The DMD, OMD, GP, NH3N, SCFA, ME and NEL values of PP was higher than reported by Shabtay et al.7, Taher-Maddah et al.26, Feizi et al.36 and Besharati and Ghezeljeh37, the different result may be due to preparation method of PP, differences in variety, environment conditions, estimation methods .

In vitro dry matter and OMD were shown to have high correlation with gas volume31 and Menke and Steingass23 suggested that gas volume at 24 h after incubation has been relationship with metabolisable energy in feedstuffs, also, Maheri-Sis et al.44 reported that amount of gas production at 24 h incubation is important because of its high positive correlation by energetic value of feedstuffs.

In farm animals, SCFAs including C2, C3, C4, iso-C4, C5 and iso-C5, that has been in the rumen by fermentation of diets by microbes (e.g. fiber), supply up to 80% of their maintenance requirements from energy. The principal SCFAs; C2, C3 and C4; have been cagerly absorbed as a nutrient cause by the ruminant. The SCFAs are about 50-70% of catable energy intake. Accordingly, it is obvious that higher SCFAs in the gas production system is the consistent index of gas production and energy content of tested diets28.

The values of pH of PP in our study were similar to Delavar et al.30, who indicated that the pH of PP was 6.48. The values of pH decrease in ration which have PEG may be due to raised passing of obtainable carbohydrate and a raise in the total bacterial population, fermentation and VFA production-regrettably, this outcomes in a lowering in pH value45. It can be said that pomegranate peel+polyethylene glycol (PEG) and detanninated pomegranate peel have a possibility relative nutritive value in farm animals under the condition of in vitro studies.

CONCLUSION


The outcomes of present research depend on chemical composition, DMD, OMD, GP, ME, NEL and SCFA indicated that addition 20 g Polyethylene glycol (PEG) for both 1, 2 and 3% pomegranate peel and used 1% detanninated pomegranate peel increased DMD and can use them as ruminants feed supplement full of valuable nutritional constituent at very low charge. Pomegranate peel+ and Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and detanninated pomegranate peel have a possibility relative nutritive value in farm animals under the condition of in vitro studies. On the other hand,, it is necessary to in vivo researches to affirming these outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


This study discovers that pomegranate peel can be improves by using polyethylene glycol or water to be detanninated and then it have a possibility relative nutritive value in farm animals under the condition of in vitro studies. This study will help the farmers to use it in ruminants feeding and decreasing the pollution in our country.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


This study was funded by National Research Centre and Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University. The authors are very grateful to the head of the National Research Centre (NRC) and Dean of Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, who have allowed the implementation of this research.

REFERENCES


  1. Oliveira, R.A., C.D. Narciso, R.S. Bisinotto, M.C. Perdomo, M.A. Ballou, M. Dreher and J.E.P. Santos, 2010. Effects of feeding polyphenols from pomegranate extract on health, growth, nutrient digestion and immunocompetence of calves. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 4280-4291.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Prakash, C.V.S. and I. Prakash, 2011. Bioactive chemical constituents from pomegranate (Punica granatum) juice, seed and peel-a review. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ., 1: 1-18.
    Direct Link

  3. Murthy, K.N.C., V.K. Reddy, J.M. Veigas and U.D. Murthy, 2004. Study on wound healing activity of Punica granatum peel. J. Med. Food, 7: 256-259.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Ross, R.G., S. Selvasubramanian and S. Jayasundar, 2001. Immunomodulatory activity of Punica granatum in rabbits-a preliminary study. J. Ethnopharmacol., 78: 85-87.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Navarro, V., M.L. Villarreal, G. Rojas and X. Lozoya, 1996. Antimicrobial evaluation of some plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases. J. Ethnopharmacol., 53: 143-147.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  6. Villalba, J.J., F.D. Provenza and R.E. Banner, 2002. Influence of macronutrients and polyethylene glycol on intake of a quebracho tannin diet by sheep and goats. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 3154-3164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Shabtay, A., H. Eitam, Y. Tadmor, A. Orlov and A. Meir et al., 2008. Nutritive and antioxidative potential of fresh and stored pomegranate industrial byproduct as a novel beef cattle feed. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56: 10063-10070.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Silanikove, N., Z. Nitsan and A. Perevolotsky, 1994. Effect of daily supplementation of polyethylene glycol on intake and digestion of tannin-containing leaves (Ceratonia siliqua) by sheep. J. Agric. Food Chem., 42: 2844-2847.
    Direct Link

  9. Silanikove, N., N. Gilboa, I. Nir, A. Perevolotsky and Z. Nitsan, 1996. Effect of a daily supplementation of polyethylene glycol on intake and digestion of tannin-containing leaves (Quercus calliprinos, Pistacia lentiscus and Ceratonia siliqua) by goats. J. Agric. Food Chem., 44: 199-205.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Titus, C.H., F.D. Provenza, A. Perevolotsky, N. Silanikove and J. Rogosic, 2001. Supplemental polyethylene glycol influences preferences of goats browsing blackbrush. J. Range Manage., 54: 161-165.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Silanikove, N., A. Perevolotsky and F.D. Provenza, 2001. Use of tannin-binding chemicals to assay for tannins and their negative postingestive effects in ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 91: 69-81.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  12. Silanikove, N., N. Gilboa and Z. Ntsan, 1997. Interactions among tannins, supplementation and polyethylene glycol in goats given oak leaves: Effects on digestion and food intake. Anim. Sci., 64: 479-483.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Salem, H.B., A. Nefzaoui, L.B. Salem and J.L. Tisserand, 1999. Intake, digestibility, urinary excretion of purine derivatives and growth by sheep given fresh, air-dried or polyethylene glycol-treated foliage of Acacia cyanophylla Lindl. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 78: 297-311.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Decandia, M., M. Sitzia, A. Cabiddu, D. Kababya and G. Molle, 2000. The use of polyethylene glycol to reduce the anti-nutritional effects of tannins in goats fed woody species. Small Rumin. Res., 38: 157-164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Kushwaha, S.C., M.B. Bera and P. Kumar, 2013. Nutritional composition of detanninated and fresh pomegranate peel powder. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol., 7: 38-42.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. AOAC., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edn., Vol. 1, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 521.

  17. van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  18. Makkar, H.P.S., M. Blummel, N.K. Borowy and K. Becker, 1993. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. J. Sci. Food Agric., 61: 161-165.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. Ismail, S.A., A.M. Abdel-Fattah, M.A. Emran, H.H. Azzaz, M.S. El-Gamal and A.M. Hashem, 2018. Effect of partial substitution of ration's soybean meal by biologically treated feathers on rumen fermentation characteristics (in vitro). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 21: 110-118.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  20. Navarro-Villa, A., M. O'Brien, S. Lopez, T.M. Boland and P. O'Kiely, 2011. Modifications of a gas production technique for assessing in vitro rumen methane production from feedstuffs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 166-167: 163-174.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Szczechowiak, J., M. Szumacher-Strabel, M. El-Sherbiny, E. Pers-Kamczyc, P. Pawlak and A. Cieslak, 2016. Rumen fermentation, methane concentration and fatty acid proportion in the rumen and milk of dairy cows fed condensed tannin and/or fish-soybean oils blend. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 216: 93-107.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Makkar, H.P.S., 2005. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 123-124: 291-302.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Menke, K.H. and H. Steingass, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28: 7-55.
    Direct Link

  24. SPSS., 2007. Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows. Version 16.0, SPSS Company Inc., Chicago, IL., USA., Pages: 444.

  25. Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Taher-Maddah, M., N. Maheri-Sis, R. Salamatdoustnobar and A. Ahmadzadeh, 2012. Estimating fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of ensiled and dried pomegranate seeds for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Open Vet. J., 2: 40-45.
    Direct Link

  27. Sadq, S.M., D.O.M. Ramzi, H.J. Hamasalim and K.A. Ahmed, 2016. Growth performance and digestibility in Karadi lambs receiving different levels of pomegranate peels. Open J. Anim. Sci., 6: 16-23.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Mirzaei-Aghsaghali, A., N. Maheri-Sis, H. Mansouri, M.E. Razeghi, A. Mirza-Aghazadeh, H. Cheraghi and A. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, 2011. Evaluating potential nutritive value of pomegranate processing by-products for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 6: 45-51.
    Direct Link

  29. Ebrahimi, B., 2012. Evaluation of pomegranate pomace using gas production technique. Eur. J. Exp. Biol., 2: 853-854.
    Direct Link

  30. Delavar, M.H., A.M. Tahmasbi, M. Danesh-Mesgaran and R. Valizadeh, 2014. In vitro rumen fermentation and gas production: Influence of different by-product feedstuffs. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol., 4: 1121-1128.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Sommart, K., D.S. Parker, P. Rowlinson and M. Wanapat, 2000. Fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in an in vitro system using cassava, rice straw and dried ruzi grass as substrates. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 1084-1093.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Blummel, M. and K. Becker, 1997. The degradability characteristics of fifty-four roughages and roughage neutral-detergent fibres as described by in vitro gas production and their relationship to voluntary feed intake. Br. J. Nutr., 77: 757-768.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Blummel, M. and E.R. Orskov, 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 40: 109-119.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Getachew, G., H.P.S. Makkar and K. Becker, 2001. Method of polyethylene glycol application to tannin-containing browses to improve microbial fermentation and efficiency of microbial protein synthesis from tannin-containing browses. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 92: 51-57.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Kamalak, A., O. Canbolat, Y. Gurbuz, O. Ozay, C.O. Ozkan and M. Sakarya, 2004. Chemical composition and in vitro gas production characteristics of several tannin containing tree leaves. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 16, No. 6.
    Direct Link

  36. Feizi, R., A. Ghodratnama, M. Zahedifar, M. Danesh-Mesgaran and M. Raisianzade, 2005. Determination apparent digestibility pomegranate seed using in vivo method. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci., 2005: 222-222.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Besharati, M. and E.A. Ghezeljeh, 2017. Effect of adding polyethylene glycol and polyvinyl pyrrolidon on in vitro gas production of pomegranate seed. KSU J. Nat. Sci., 20: 128-132.
    Direct Link

  38. Getachew, G., G.M. Crovetto, M. Fondevila, U. Krishnamoorthy and B. Singh et al., 2002. Laboratory variation of 24 h in vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy values of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 102: 169-180.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  39. Seresinhe, T. and C. Iben, 2003. In vitro quality assessment of two tropical shrub legumes in relation to their extractable tannins contents. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 87: 109-115.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Singh, B., A. Sahoo, R. Sharma and T.K. Bhat, 2005. Effect of polethylene glycol on gas production parameters and nitrogen disappearance of some tree forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 123-124: 351-364.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Feizi, R., A. Ghodratnama, M. Zahedifar, M. Danesh-Mesgaran and M. Raisianzadeh, 2007. Determination chemical composition and apparent digestibility of pomegranate seed fed to sheep. Proc. 2nd Congr. Anim. Aquat. Sci., 1: 735-739.

  42. Reed, J.D., 1995. Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 1516-1528.
    PubMedDirect Link

  43. Min, B.R., T.N. Barry, G.T. Attwood and W.C. McNabb, 2003. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 106: 3-19.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  44. Maheri-Sis, N., M. Chamani, A.A. Sadeghi, A. Mirza-Aghazadeh and A. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, 2008. Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for ruminants using In vitro gas production technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 2946-2951.
    Direct Link

  45. Nagaraja, T.G. and E.C. Titgemeyer, 2007. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: The current microbiological and nutritional outlook. J. Dairy Sci., 90: E17-E38.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Related Articles

Effect of Partial Substitution of Ration’s Soybean Meal by Biologically Treated Feathers on Rumen Fermentation Characteristics (in vitro)

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved