Submit Manuscript

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2017 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 76-83
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Sandra Amri, Mourad Bensouilah and Kheireddine Ouali

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study is to monitor the variation in the condition index at the level of two populations, male and female of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) fished in the most Southeastern part of the Mediterranean (Gulf of Annaba) and the structure of the population through sex-ratio determination. Methodology: Sampling was done monthly from February, 2012 to January, 2013 at three stations (Gap de Garde, Lacaroube and Draouch) and the physico-chemical characterization of the water was performed by in situ measurements of temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen. In addition, the individuals harvested were dissected, sexed and weighed to determine their condition index and the sex-ratio. Results: The physico-chemical parameters revealed that the waters of the 3 sampling stations are favorable for the development of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Furthermore, the condition index indicated that the highest values were recorded in spring (March and April). However, the lowest values were found between July and November. Conclusion: Overall, the structure of the population of Paracentrotus lividus differed from one station to another, the sex-ratio of the population was estimated at 46.99% at station S1, 39.11% at station S2 and 48.31% at station S3.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: November 03, 2016;   Accepted: December 19, 2016;   Published: January 15, 2017
Copyright: © 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

INTRODUCTION

In the Mediterranean, the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) is one of the benthic invertebrate species subject to the most pressure for commercial and recreational purposes1. This sea urchin has a broad distribution throughout the Mediterranean sea2,3, ranging from the upper mediolittoral to infralittoral zones to a depth of less than 80 m4,5. It exhibits close linkages with the substrate, derived from their life habits such as locomotion and feeding6. Its population density presumably expresses negative feedback by modulating growth and reproduction7. Due to its sedentary habits and sensitivity to pollutants, it has been used in several studies as an indicator of local biological and biochemical pollution8. Its responses to environmental conditions are considered to be changes in its physiological processes linked to its phenotypic plasticity9-11. In addition, its gonads are considered a delicacy12 and have made it one of the most popular sea foods in different countries13,14. The Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus has been the subject of numerous studies11,15-19. However, regarding Algeria only the Southwest part of the coast has been studied with respect to the sea-urchin Paracentrotus lividus, with studies from Dermeche et al.20, Soualili and Guillou21 and Guettaf et al.22. As a result, this study focused on the biology of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus inhabiting the extreme Southeast Mediterranean (Gulf of Annaba) by monitoring the monthly variation in the condition index of both male and female populations determining its sex-ratio.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted from February, 2012 to January, 2013 in the Gulf of Annaba (Fig. 1). The latter is limited on the East by Cape Rosa and on the West by Cap de Garde23. Three sampling stations were chosen, the characteristics of each of these stations are given in Table 1.

It was characterized the environment by in situ measurements of the physicochemical parameters of the water (Temperature, pH, salinity and dissolved oxygen), using a multi-parameter measurement system. Thirty sea urchins were harvested and transported to the laboratory in coolers filled with oxygenated seawater. The samples were dissected and weighed using a caliper and a balance. Sex determination was based on the color of the gonads, the testicles are a creamy-yellow color and the ovaries orange. Sometimes the color of the gonads can be very light or very dark, making it impossible to determine the sex, thus the sex of the individuals concerned is considered indeterminate. The physiological state of the organism was determined by calculating the Condition Index (CI) proposed by AFNOR24:

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Sex was determined by observation of the color of the gonads and their milt15.

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean
Fig. 1: Representation of the sampling stations in the Southeast Mediterranean (Gulf of Annaba, Algeria)

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean
Fig. 2: Temporal variation in the condition index at station 1 (Gulf of Annaba, February, 2012-January, 2013)

Table 1: Characterization of the sampling stations of the Gulf of Annaba (Algeria)
Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Population structure was determined by calculating the ratio suggested by Loubens25:

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Statistical analysis: The data are expressed as average values±standard errors and the statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Minitab 13 software. The variation of the condition index between the two sexes was assessed by the Student test. Also, the hypothesis null H0: Sex-ratio = 50% was verified by the chi-square test (χ2) to indicate the proportion of each sex. Corrections between sets of parameters (CI of males, CI of females, temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen) were evaluated to analyze the intensity of relations between parameters.

RESULTS

The results of the monthly variation of physico-chemical parameters are presented in Table 2. The average values of the physico-chemical parameters of the water are between 14.17 and 29.43°C for temperature, 9.36 and 8.03 for pH, 37.23 and 31.63‰ for salinity, 0 and 011.11 mg L–1 for dissolved oxygen. It appears that the highest values were recorded at summer temperatures, the pH was slightly alkaline and the dissolved oxygen content over the base (0 mg L–1) is indicated for the summers of 2012 and 2013 for the 3 sampling stations.

The monthly evolution of the condition index revealed a similar trend for both sexes at the three stations, while the Student test showed no significant difference between the sexes for station S1 (T = 0.12, p = 0.90), station S2 (T = -0.50, p = 0.96) or station S3 (T = -0.93, p = 0.36). At the level of station S1 (Cape de Garde) a peak was reported in April for both male and female populations with values in the range of 34.92±5.4 and 34.12±7.18, respectively (Fig. 2). However, this index fell during August for males (8.61±2.49%) and during November for females (8.55±2.41%).

Regarding station S2 (Lacaroub), the highest CI values were found in March (27.37±8.34%) for the male population and in April (28.01±5.27%) for the female population (Fig. 3). The minimum was found in July (7.12±2.4%) and August (5.49±3.15%) for males and females, respectively.

Table 2: Annual variation of water physicochemical parameters in sampling stations (Gulf of Annaba; February, 2012-January, 2013)
Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean
T: Temperature (°C), S: Salinity (‰), DO: Dissolved oxygen (mg L–1)

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean
Fig. 3: Temporal variation in the condition index at station 2 (Gulf Annaba, February, 2012-January, 2013)

Table 3: Matrix of correlations between physico-chemical parameters and condition index
Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Table 4: Spatial distribution of the sex-ratio of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Gulf of Annaba
Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean

Image for - Variation of the Condition Index and Sex-ratio of the Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Southeast Mediterranean
Fig. 4: Temporal variation in the condition index at station 3 (Gulf of Annaba, February, 2012-January, 2013)

For station S3 (Draouch), the maximum condition index was recorded in April for males and females with values in the ranges of 24.55±6.89 and 29.48±7.33%, respectively (Fig. 4). However, the minimum was found in November for males (10.53±6.38%) and in the month of October for females (11.04±2.98%).

Pearson simple linear correlations between five biotic and abiotic variables taken two by two compared to the total population was calculated. It should be noted that these correlation coefficients measure the strength of the linear relationship between the variables taken two by two. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 3. The results clearly indicate the presence of a proportional correlation between the variation of the male CI and the female CI. The results as a correlation between the change in condition indices of both sexes (male and female) and abiotic parameters (pH and dissolved oxygen) was obtained. However, no correlation of this index with salinity was reported.

The gender distribution of the population of Paracentrotus lividus is given in Table 4. The values obtained show a dominance of females compared to males at the 3 stations in the Gulf of Annaba. However, the statistical analysis indicates that the sex-ratio is not different from the theoretical proportion of 50% for station S1 (χ² = 0.628, p = 0.427) and station S3 (χ² = 1.697, p = 0.192). But at station S2 significant differences were found between the proportions of both sexes (χ² = 4.564, p = 0.032).

DISCUSSION

The variation of marine abiotic parameters has a considerable effect on the structure and functions of many aquatic organisms and the environmental factors affecting the modalities of sea urchin reproduction have been extensively covered in the literature26. The measurement of the physicochemical parameters revealed that the waters at the 3 sampling stations were favorable for the development of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. The latter mainly colonizes temperate regions where thermal conditions fluctuate between 10 and 15°C in winter and 18 and 25°C in summer27. The temperature may influence spawning and previous studies on Paracentrotus lividus highlighted that rising sea temperatures may serve as a proximate cue for the induction of spawning4. Temperature also can affect spawning duration and thus act directly on gonad growth and nutrient accumulation, permitting gametogenesis21. Sea temperatures may also influence gonad growth by acting directly on food availability and food intake.

Sea urchins can develop adaptive mechanisms to changes in the physicochemical parameters of water and adult urchins can regulate the ion concentrations in their extracellular fluid to deal with changes in pH28. Moreover, they have low respiratory rates due to the diffusion of low amounts of oxygen in their tissues. This is also the case for salinity. Sea urchins inhabiting shallow coastal waters where the salinity fluctuations occur29 have highly improved osmoregulatory characteristics30,31. The condition index is an indicator of the physiological state of individuals32,33, it gives an idea of the state of health of the individuals of a population34. At the three research stations, the condition index indicated a fairly pronounced monthly change, the increase in the condition index in spring could be explained by hypertrophy of the gonads and the storage of nutrients.

The results of Lawrence and Guille35, Fernandez36 and McClintock and Pearse37 showed that the biochemical components of the gonads vary according to season.

Spirlet et al.38 focused on the existence of a relationship between the period of reproduction in the echinoids inhabiting temperate regions and the period of storage of nutrients. McQuaid and Lawrie39 explained that the increase in the condition index signals the maturation of the gonads and the accumulation of reserves. However, its decrease indicates the emission of gametes40. The occurrence of a period of high planktonic productivity was identified as important for the process of gonadal maturation of the sea urchin41.

These results also revealed that the growth of individuals following a rhythm that differed from one station to another, certainly imposed by the quality of the environment, indicated that sea urchins can delay their reproduction. This conclusion is based on the comparison of our seasonal observations and as a function of weather conditions42. Our findings are supported by the study of Byrne43 which showed atrophy of the gonads in urchins harvested in intertidal areas poor in nutritional matter. The proportion of the sexes is a characteristic of the species whose variations are sometimes linked to environmental factors.

According to Kartas and Quignard44, the sex ratio is one of the parameters that contribute to maintaining this species’ capacity of reproduction. This index represents the abundance of one sex compared to the other8. At the level of the sampling stations, only station S2 presented an imbalance between the sexes in favor of females. This has already been observed by Dermeche et al.20, Guettaf et al.22, Semroud and Senoussi45 and Neefs46. This difference could be explained by a high mortality rate and/or a difference in the growth rate47.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained showed that the physico-chemical parameters of the waters of the Gulf of Annaba are favorable for the development of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. In addition, it was observed that a similar trend in the variation of the condition index in both sexes of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus and that physiological status was maximum in spring, probably due to high consumption in winter and the breeding period. On the other hand, population structure varied from one station to another, probably due to environmental constraints.

SIGNIFICANT STATEMENTS

Sea urchin gonads can be used as antioxidants in a manner similar to other polyphenolic components from plants. The researchers focused on such bio-macromolecules accumulated as nutrients during gametogenesis. The use of these sources of natural antioxidants could contribute to the development of echino culture. The highlights of this study are:

• It shows the effect of abiotic parameters on the physiological state of the sea urchin
• It uses population structure to indicate imbalances in favor of either gender
• It identifies the period of gametogenesis in males and females
• It identifies the period of gonad maturity and nutrient accumulation

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was carried out in the framework of nationally sponsored research projects (PNR N: 8/u23/980) financed by the General Manager for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DGRSDT), Algeria.

REFERENCES

  1. Ceccherelli, G., S. Pinna and N. Sechi, 2009. Evaluating the effects of protection on Paracentrotus lividus distribution in two contrasting habitats. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci., 81: 59-64.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  2. Bayed, A., F. Quiniou, A. Benrha and M. Guillou, 2005. The Paracentrotus lividus populations from the northern Moroccan Atlantic coast: Growth, reproduction and health condition. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 85: 999-1007.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  3. De Casamajor, M.N., J. Mahias, V. Castets, N. Caill-Milly, N. Bru and M. Lissardy, 2017. Tidal level influence on the spawning process of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) on a rocky shore (Bay of Biscay). Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 9: 126-134.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  4. Fenaux, L., 1968. Maturation des gonades et cycle saisonnier des larves chez Arbacia lixula, Paracentrotus lividus et Psammechinus microtuberculatus (Echinides) a Villefranche-sur-Mer. Vie Milieu Fr. Ser. A, 19 : 1-52.
  5. Munar, J. and I. Moreno, 1987. Echinodermos de las Islas Baleares (Espana). In: Colloque International sur Paracentrotus lividus et les Oursins Comestibles, Boudouresque, C.F. (Ed.). Gis Posidonie Publisher, Marseille, France, pp: 241-253.
  6. Labbe-Bellas, R., C.A.M.M. Cordeiro, S.R. Floeter and B.B. Segal, 2016. Sea urchin abundance and habitat relationships in different Brazilian reef types. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 8: 33-40.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  7. Urriago, J.D., J.C.Y. Wong, C.P. Dumont and J.W. Qiu, 2016. Reproduction of the short-spined sea urchin Heliocidaris crassispina (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in Hong Kong with a subtropical climate. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 8: 445-453.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  8. Coteur, G., B. Danis, S.W. Fowler, J.L. Teyssie, P. Dubois and M. Warnau, 2001. Effects of PCBs on reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by the immune cells of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata). Mar. Pollut. Bull., 42: 667-672.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  9. Russell, M.P., 1987. Life history traits and resource allocation in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 108: 199-216.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  10. Edwards, P.B. and T.A. Ebert, 1991. Plastic responses to limited food availability and spine damage in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 145: 205-220.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  11. Lozano, J., J. Galera, S. Lopez, X. Turon, C. Palacin and G. Morera, 1995. Biological cycles and recruitment of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in two contrasting habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 122: 179-191.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  12. Carboni, S., J. Vignier, M. Chiantore, D.R. Tocher and H. Migaud, 2012. Effects of dietary microalgae on growth, survival and fatty acid composition of sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus throughout larval development. Aquaculture, 324-325,: 250-258.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  13. Powell, C., A.D. Hughes, M.S. Kelly, S. Conner and G.J. McDougall, 2014. Extraction and identification of antioxidant polyhydroxynaphthoquinone pigments from the sea urchin, Psammechinus miliaris. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 59: 455-460.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  14. Fernandez-Boan, M., J. Freire, A.M. Parma, L. Fernandez and J.M. Orensanz, 2013. Monitoring the fishing process in the sea urchin diving fishery of Galicia. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 70: 604-617.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  15. Sellem, F. and M. Guillou, 2007. Reproductive biology of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in two contrasting habitats of Northern Tunisia (South-East Mediterranean). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 87: 763-767.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  16. Sanchez-Espana, A.I., I. Martinez-Pita and F.J. Garcia, 2004. Gonadal growth and reproduction in the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) from Southern Spain. Hydrobiologia, 519: 61-72.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  17. Demnati, S., A. Chafi, B. Attrassi, B. Haloui, M. Kharboua and M. Ramdani, 2011. Bio-accumulation des metaux lourds chez l'oursin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) sur la Côte Est de la Mediterranee marocaine. Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Veterinaires, 22: 79-84.
    Direct Link
  18. Warnau, M., R. Biondo, A. Temara, J.M. Bouquegneau, M. Jangoux and P. Dubois, 1998. Distribution of heavy metals in the echinoid Paracentrotus lividus from the Mediterranean Posidonia oceanica ecosystem: Seasonal and geographical variations. J. Sea Res., 39: 267-280.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  19. Warnau, M., G. Ledent, A. Temara, J.M. Bouquegneau, M. Jangoux and P. Dubois, 1995. Heavy metals in Posidonia oceanica and Paracentrotus lividus from seagrass beds of the North-Western Mediterranean. Sci. Total Environ., 171: 95-99.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  20. Dermeche, S., F. Chahrour and Z. Boutiba, 2009. Contribution a l’etude des variations des indices physiologiques (indice de repletion-indice gonadique et sex-ratio) chez la population d’oursins comestibles Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck,1816) du littoral occidental Algerien. Eur. J. Scient. Res., 30: 153-163.
    Direct Link
  21. Soualili, D. and M. Guillou, 2009. Variation in the reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in three differently polluted locations near Algiers (Algeria). Mar. Biodivers. Rec., Vol. 2.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  22. Guettaf, M., G.A. San Martin and P. Francour, 2000. Interpopulation variability of the reproductive cycle of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the South-Western Mediterranean. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 80: 899-907.
    Direct Link
  23. Belabed, B.E., X. Laffray, A. Dhib, M. Fertouna-Belakhal, S. Turki and L. Aleya, 2013. Factors contributing to heavy metal accumulation in sediments and in the intertidal mussel Perna perna in the Gulf of Annaba (Algeria). Mar. Pollut. Bull., 74: 477-489.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  24. AFNOR, 1985. Condition index. Norme NFV 45056, (In French).
  25. Loubens, G., 1980. Biologie de quelques especes de poissons du lagon neo-caledonien: 2. Sexualite et reproduction. Cahiers de l'Indo Pacifique, 2: 41-72.
    Direct Link
  26. Bronstein, O. and Y. Loya, 2015. Photoperiod, temperature and food availability as drivers of the annual reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Echinometra sp. from the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Coral Reefs, 34: 275-289.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  27. DeCasamajor, M.N., 2004. Baie de Biscaye: Richesse Meconnue et Diversite. Editions Alexandre Dewez, Ascain, France.
  28. Stickle, W.B. and W.J. Diehl, 1987. Effects of Salinity on Echinoderms. In: Echinoderm Studies, Jangoux, M. and J.M. Lawrence (Eds.). Vol. 2, A.A. Balkema, USA., pp: 235-285.
  29. Vidolin, D., I.A. Santos-Gouvea and C.A. Freire, 2007. Differences in ion regulation in the sea urchins Lytechinus variegatus and Arbacia lixula (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK., 87: 769-775.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  30. Whiteley, N.M., J.L. Scott, S.J. Breeze and L. McCann, 2001. Effects of water salinity on acid-base balance in decapod crustaceans. J. Exp. Biol., 204: 1003-1011.
    Direct Link
  31. Dissanayake, A., R. Clough, J.I. Spicer and M.B. Jones, 2010. Effects of hypercapnia on acid-base balance and osmo-/iono-regulation in prawns (Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Aquatic Biol., 11: 27-36.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  32. Bodoy, A., 1980. Croissance et variation de la composition biochimique du bivalve Spisula subtruntata (DaCosta) dans le golfe de Marseille (Mediterranee occidentale). Tethys, 11: 57-66.
  33. Lucas, A. and P.G. Beninger, 1985. The use of physiological condition indices in marine bivalve aquaculture. Aquaculture, 44: 187-200.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  34. Ansell, A.D. and F. Lagardere, 1980. Observations on the biology of Donax trunculus and D. vittatus at Ile d'Oleron (French Atlantic Coast). Mar. Biol., 57: 287-300.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  35. Lawrence, J.M. and A. Guille, 1982. Organic composition of tropical, polar and temperate-water echinoderms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B: Comp. Biochem., 72: 283-287.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  36. Fernandez, C., 1998. Seasonal changes in the biochemical composition of the edible sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus Echinodermata: Echinoidea in a lagoonal environment. Mar. Ecol., 19: 1-11.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  37. McClintock, J.B. and J.S. Pearse, 1987. Biochemical composition of antarctic echinoderms. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B: Comp. Biochem., 86: 683-687.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  38. Spirlet, C., P. Grosjean and M. Jangoux, 1998. Reproductive cycle of the echinoid Paracentrotus lividus: Analysis by means of the maturity index. Invertebrate Reprod. Dev., 34: 69-81.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  39. McQuaid, C.D. and S.M. Lawrie, 2005. Supply-side ecology of the brown mussel, Perna perna: An investigation of spatial and temporal variation in and coupling between, gamete release and larval supply. Mar. Biol., 147: 955-963.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  40. Lasiak, T.A. and T.C.E. Barnard, 1995. Recruitment of the brown mussel Perna perna onto natural substrata: A refutation of the primary/secondary settlement hypothesis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 120: 147-153.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  41. Zhadan, P.M., M.A. Vaschenko and T.N. Almyashova, 2015. Spawning failure in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius in the Northwestern Sea of Japan: Potential environmental causes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 465: 11-23.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  42. Epherra, L., D.G. Gil, T. Rubilar, S. Perez-Gallo, M.B. Reartes and J.A. Tolosano, 2015. Temporal and spatial differences in the reproductive biology of the sea urchin Arbacia dufresnii. Mar. Freshwater Res., 66: 329-342.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  43. Byrne, M., 1990. Annual reproductive cycles of the commercial sea urchin paracentrotus lividus from an exposed intertidal and a sheltered subtidal habitat on the West coast of Ireland. Mar. Biol., 104: 275-289.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  44. Kartas, F. and J.P. Quignard, 1984. La Fecondite des Poissons Teleosteens. Masson, Paris, ISBN: 9782225804557, Pages: 121.
  45. Semroud, R. and Y. Senoussi, 1989. Donnees preliminaires sur l'indice gonadique, l'indice de repletion et la sex-ratio de Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck) (Echinodermatea: Echinidea) de la baie d'Alger. Vie Mar. H.S., 10: 86-94.
  46. Neefs, Y., 1952. Remarques sur le cycle sexuel de Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 234: 2233-2235.
  47. McPherson, B.F., 1968. Contributions to the biology of the sea urchin Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck). Bull. Mar. Sci., 18: 400-443.
    Direct Link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *