• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Biological Sciences
  2. Vol 14 (8), 2014
  3. 494-500
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2014 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 8 | Page No.: 494-500
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2014.494.500
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia

Khalid Abdullah Alhudaib, Adel Abdel-Sabour Rezk, Babiker Mohamed Ahmed Abdel-Banat and Ahmed Mohamed Soliman

ABSTRACT


The whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) is a worldwide important insect pest and vector of plant viruses. Recently, the whitefly populations upsurges dramatically in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia due to the expansion in greenhouse cropping system and it causes severe economic damage to many vegetable crops in greenhouses. Proper classification of the whitefly that prevails in the area is a crucial step towards efficient management of the pest. The whitefly is highly polymorphic with extreme plasticity in key morphological characters that vary according to the host which makes the taxonomic identity of existing biotype is difficult and sometimes ambiguous. The specimens for this study were collected from nine different locations of the whitefly populations in Al-Ahsa region. The study was done on the basis of three molecular techniques namely: (1) PCR amplification and polymorphic analysis of restriction enzyme digestion of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (mtCOI), (2) Cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene and (3) Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction (RAPD PCR) analysis. The results of these molecular techniques clearly indicated the dominance of B biotype of the whitefly on crops grown in greenhouses in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: November 17, 2014;   Accepted: December 29, 2014;   Published: March 25, 2015

How to cite this article

Khalid Abdullah Alhudaib, Adel Abdel-Sabour Rezk, Babiker Mohamed Ahmed Abdel-Banat and Ahmed Mohamed Soliman, 2014. Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Biological Sciences, 14: 494-500.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2014.494.500

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2014.494.500

INTRODUCTION


The whitefly Bemisia tabaci is attacking most high value and economically important crops that grown in greenhouses in Saudi Arabia causing severe damage through direct feeding on plants cells sap and transmitting plant viruses (Al-Zahrani, 2010; McKenzie et al., 2012). Among B. tabaci species complex, the B biotype (formerly known as B. argentifolii) is the only known whitefly transmitter of geminiviruses (Brown, 2010). The whitefly is capable of establishing excessive populations, particularly in irrigated arid lands grown with field and greenhouse crops (Brown, 1994). The whitefly has the potential to colonize a wide range of approximately 700 species of plants that are primarily vegetables and fibers of economic importance worldwide. Recent studies indicated that numerous populations of B. tabaci vary rather in their capacity to develop high population densities and cause direct feeding damage but they can transmit geminiviruses (Brown and Idris, 2005; Brown and Bird, 1992; Czosnek and Brown, 2010). Viral transmission is most likely semi-persistent as discussed for Beet pseudoyellows virus (Pusag et al., 2012; Moreno-Delafuente et al., 2013). In Saudi Arabia, a number of plant diseases were caused by viruses that transmitted by the whitefly including Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) (Mazyad et al., 1977; Al-Shahwan et al., 1997; Alhudaib et al., 2013). The Squash leaf curl virus (SqLCV) was reported in different locations of Saudi Arabia in 2002 (Al-Shahwan et al., 2002). When identifying and describing insect taxon, the morphology has been used historically to separate species. Among several groups of insects, however, morphological characters can vary with respect to environmental factors within a single species, or be convergent and cryptic among closely related species as to be of limited usefulness (Rosell et al., 1997; Hu et al., 2011). The study of insects’ biology and molecular profiles become essential to define species and characterize populations. At the molecular level, protein and DNA polymorphisms can be combined with the study of biological characteristics by using either one or combinations of different technological approaches. The most common practically approaches were the electrophoresis of allozymes, analysis of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) and nucleic acid sequence comparisons of nuclear or mitochondrial DNA markers (De Barro and Driver, 1997). Protein polymorphism was also utilized to investigate natural populations of B. tabaci. Differences in esterase isozyme patterns were used to describe two biotypes of the whitefly, the native form A biotype and the other form B biotype which exhibited high population density, wide host range, high insecticide resistance and capable of inducing silverleaf symptoms on some plants (Brown et al., 1995a, b). The whitefly B. tabaci A biotype was previously the predominant biotype in most regions of the Mediterranean and Middle East. Many of these populations had been displaced by the B biotype. A new Q biotype of whitefly spread rapidly into several states of the USA. It is less susceptible to many of the insecticides currently used to manage the A and B biotypes of whitefly. The Q biotype of whitefly was believed to have been originated in the Mediterranean region and have been associated with the whitefly control problems (Hadjistylli et al., 2010; Czosnek and Brown, 2010). Other reports suggested that there might be additional biotypes, eighteen biotypes from throughout the world have been described based on esterase banding patterns alone (Brown et al., 1995a). DNA sequence comparisons can be made between individuals or populations using a PCR generated marker genes from either the nuclear or the mitochondrial DNA (Calvert et al., 2001). The latter offers some advantages; it is maternally inherited and non-recombining and contains known and predictable gene sequences for which universal primers for insects have been designed. The sequences of some genetic markers are sufficient for population level analysis and for molecular characterization that help to solve the taxonomy puzzle of B. tabaci complex (Gill and Brown, 2010). In this study, several molecular techniques were used to identify the biotype of whitefly populations in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia. Unveiling the identity of the predominant whitefly populations in the region will help to design an efficient whitefly management strategy to combat this cryptic insect pest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Source of specimen: Whitefly populations on tomato were separately collected from different locations in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia.

Genomic DNA extraction: Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 individual adults from each of the 9 populations using a modified extraction method previously described by Anfoka et al. (2008). Briefly, 5 whitefly adults were ground in 50 μL extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM EDTA) and incubated in water bath at 65°C for 10 min. One-fifth volume of 5 M potassium acetate and an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/ isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) were added. The mixtures were kept on ice for 10 min and then clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. An equal volume of isopropanol was added to the supernatant of the mixture. Incubated at -20°C for 10 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. After air dry, the pellets were washed with 70% ethanol and suspended in deionized distilled water (ddH2O).

Characterization of the whitefly species by PCR and restriction enzyme digestion: PCR was used to amplify mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) gene using primers 2195F and 3014R (Table 1) (Frohlich et al., 1999; Khasdan et al., 2005; Cifuentes et al., 2011). The thermocycling conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of preheating for 5 min at 95°C followed by 35 cycles each for 30 sec at 94°C, 45 sec at 52°C and 1 min at 72°C, then followed by an extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were digested with VspI restriction enzyme by adding 2 μL of enzyme buffer to 10 μL of PCR product and 0.5 μL of the VspI enzyme then the total mixture was completed to 20 μL by adding 7.5 μL ddH2O.

Table 1: Primers* used in this study
Image for - Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)  Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia
*Pair of primers 2195 F and 3014 R were used to amplify the whitefly mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene (mtCOI) fragment. The pair of primers WF-F and WF-R were used to amplify the whitefly mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene fragment. The primers F2, F12, H9 and H16 were individually used to amplify and analyze polymorphism in whitefly genomic DNA via RAPD PCR

The digestion reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 2 h, electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel in 0.5×TBE buffer and the DNA was stained with ethidium bromide. The gel was visualized with UV illumination using Gel Documentation System (SYNGENE).

Amplification and sequencing of the whitefly mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene: The PCR was used to partially amplify the mitochondrial 16S rRNA. The experiment was done on the specimens collected from 9 different locations using primers WF-F and WF-R (Table 1) (Frohlich et al., 1999). The PCR amplifications were performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 2.5 μL of genomic DNA, 2.5 μL of 10ΧTaq polymerase buffer, 2.5 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 2.5 μL of 10 mM dNTPs, 1 μL of both the forward and reverse primers (10 μM each), 0.3 μL of Taq polymerase (5 U μL-1) and ddH2O to complete reaction volume. Amplifications were performed for 30 cycles in a thermal cycler started at 95°C for 1 min for denaturation, annealing at 50°C for 50 sec, extension 72°C for 50 sec and a final one cycle for extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gel in 0.5×TBE buffer. The 1 kb DNA ladder (Promega) was used as marker to determine the size of the PCR products. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and then visualized with UV illumination using Gel Documentation System (SYNGENE).

The PCR products from the 7 whitefly specimens were cloned into pGEM®T-Easy vector (Promega) following the supplier’s instructions. The ligation mixture contained 5 μL of 2ΧRapid buffer, 1 μL of pGEM®T-Easy vector, 2 μL of PCR product and 1 μL of T4 DNA ligase. The reaction was completed to 10 μL with ddH2O, mixed gently by pipetting, then incubated at 4°C overnight.

The transformation protocol was as follows: The competent cells DH5α™ were thawed on ice for 30 min. Hundred microliter was transferred into a pre-chilled 5 mL tube and 5 μL of the ligated DNA was added and the tube was incubated on ice for another 30 min. Cells were heat-shocked for 2 min at 42°C in a water bath and then incubated on ice for 2 min. Hundred microliter of LB medium was added and then cells were grown for 1 h at 37°C in a shaking water bath. Transformed cells were plated on LB plates containing 60 μg mL-1 ampicillin and the plates were incubated at 37°C overnight (16 h). Single bacterial colonies were inoculated into LB medium with 60 μg mL-1 ampicillin and grown overnight in a shaking water bath at 37°C. Recombinant plasmids were extracted using Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Recombinant plasmids were digested with EcoRI to confirm the insert size. The digestion reaction was containing 2.5 μL of ddH2O, 0.5 μL of EcoRI restriction enzyme, 1 μL of 10×buffer H and 6 μL of prepared plasmids. The reaction mixture was incubated in water bath at 37°C for 4 h. The digested DNA was electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel. The partial nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene from 7 B. tabaci populations were determined. Multiple sequence alignment of the nucleotide sequences were performed using the MEGA6 software (Tamura et al., 2013) and clustalx program (Thompson et al., 1997). Phylogenetic analysis relationships were done with multiple individuals within populations.

RAPD PCR analysis: RAPD PCR experiment was done on 9 whitefly populations using the primers F2, F12, H9 and H16 (Table 1) (De Barro and Driver, 1997). The PCR amplifications were achieved in a total volume of 25 μL as stated before. The amplification was done using the following thermocycling parameters: one cycle of 5 min at 94°C, 2 min at 40°C and 3 min at 72°C, followed by 39 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1.5 min at 40°C and 2 min at 72°C and 1 cycle of a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Characterization of Al-Ahsa whitefly populations by PCR and restriction digestion of the mtCOI gene: Amplification of the mtCOI gene using the primers 2195F and 3014R gave a fragment of about 816 bp (Fig. 1a) from all whitefly populations collected from different locations in Al-Ahsa. The products of the primers pair is consistent with previously published results on whiteflies from elsewhere (Khasdan et al., 2005; Cifuentes et al., 2011). The amplified PCR products were digested with VspI restriction enzyme. There is a clear evidence that VspI restriction digestion of the mtCOI of B biotype whiteflies always give a single band of size around 800 bp (Khasdan et al., 2005).

Image for - Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)  Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia
Fig. 1(a-b):
Al-Ahsa whitefly mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI). (a) PCR amplification of mtCOI from 7 representative specimens collected from different locations (lanes 1-7) and (b) The same PCR products were digested with the restriction enzyme VspI (lanes 1-7). M: 100 bp DNA ladder as a marker

On the other hand, VspI restriction digestion of the mtCOI of Q biotype whiteflies give two distinct bands of sizes about 300 and 500 bp (De Barro et al., 2000; Horowitz et al., 2005; Bosco et al., 2006; Chiel et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2009; Al-Shehi and Khan, 2013). The present results of VspI restriction enzyme digestion of the PCR products showed a single band (Fig. 1b). This result indicates the predominance of the B biotype whitefly in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia. None of the collected whitefly populations from Al-Ahsa region contains either the Q biotype or any other whitefly biotype.

Characterization of Al-Ahsa whitefly populations by partial sequencing of 16S rRNA: The PCR amplification of mitochondrial 16S rRNA with the primers WF-F and WF-R gave a fragment of about 500 bp from all tested whitefly specimens. PCR products obtained from 7 whitefly templates were cloned and sequenced to confirm the biotype of the whitefly under study. The sequences obtained from 7 whitefly populations were identical, therefore only 1 representative sequence was submitted to the GenBank® (Benson et al., 2013) under the accession number JN033570. The identified DNA sequence of the whitefly mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene was aligned with the other sequences available in GenBank® using neighbor joining method implemented in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013). The phylogenetic tree showed clustering of Al-Ahsa whitefly 16S rRNA gene with the B biotype genetic sequences (Fig. 2). These results are in general agreement with the data that shown by other investigators (Frohlich et al., 1999; De Barro et al., 2000; Tahiri et al., 2013).

RAPD PCR analysis: Due to its several advantages, RAPD PCR is commonly practiced to distinguish between the most common whiteflies. The technique is reliable, does not require a foreknowledge about any particular gene in the target organism and facilitates the use of more than one primer at a time to increase confidence. Here, 4 random primers were used, namely F1, F12, H9 and H16 (Table 1) in the RAPD PCR amplifications to distinguish between the indigenous Saudi Arabia whitefly populations and others possibly alien biotypes. The banding pattern shown in Fig. 3 reveals the consistency of random primer amplifications of the whitefly populations from Al-Ahsa region. All used random primers showed uniform banding patterns with all tested whitefly populations. It has been reported that the region between 600 and 900 bp demonstrated some polymorphism between different B biotype individuals when amplified with F12 primer but the region between 300 and 600 bp gave of size around 800 bp (Khasdan et al., 2005). On the other hand, VspI restriction digestion of the mtCOI of Q biotype whiteflies give two distinct bands of sizes about 300 and 500 bp (De Barro et al., 2000; Horowitz et al., 2005; Bosco et al., 2006; Chiel et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2009; Al-Shehi and Khan, 2013). The present results of VspI restriction enzyme digestion of the PCR products showed a single band (Fig. 1b).

Image for - Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)  Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia
Fig. 2:
Phylogenetic tree of the whiteflies mitochondrial 16S rRNA. The evolutionary history and analyses were inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method implemented in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The analysis involved 22 nucleotide sequences obtained from the GenBank® (accession numbers are in brackets)

Image for - Molecular Identification of the Biotype of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)  Inhabiting the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia
Fig. 3(a-b):
RAPD PCR profiles of Al-Ahsa whitefly. (a) RAPD PCR profiles obtained from specimens collected from 9 different locations using the primer F2 for lanes 1-9 and the primer F12 for lanes 10-18 and (b) Using the primer H9 for lanes 1-9 and the primer H16 for lanes 10-18. M: 1 kb DNA ladder as marker

This result indicates the predominance of the B biotype whitefly in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia. None of the collected whitefly populations from Al-Ahsa region contains either the Q biotype or any other whitefly biotype.

The whitefly biotypes may vary in their efficiency of virus transmission, host utilization, development rate, fecundity, dispersal ability, infestation symptoms, insecticides resistance and the degree of endosymbiosis (Oliveira et al., 2001; Sseruwagi et al., 2005). Detailed molecular analyses using three techniques revealed the prevalence of the whitefly B biotype in Al-Ahsa region of Saudi Arabia. During the course of this study, it has been reported the existence of A- and Q-like biotypes on cucumber grown in Fayfa region of Saudi Arabia near Yemen border (Ragab, 2013). The current research finding could help the crop protection specialists in the region to design suitable control strategies against this particular biotype and to take suitable preventive measures against any possible invasion by the A- and Q-like biotypes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


The authors would like to thank Mr. Wael Sayed Al-Araby for technical assistance. This research was supported by grant for scientific research from King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST).

REFERENCES


  1. Alhudaib, K.A., A. Rezk and W. Alaraby, 2013. Molecular biodiversity of tomato yellow leaf curl disease associated viruses in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the APS-MSA Joint Meeting, August 10-14, 2013, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX., USA.
    Direct Link

  2. Al-Shahwan, I.M., O.A. Abdalla and M.A. Al-Saleh, 1997. Viruses in the northern potato-producing regions of Saudi Arabia. Plant Pathol., 46: 91-94.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  3. Al-Shahwan, I.M., O.A. Aballa and M.A. Al-Saleh, 2002. Squash Leaf Curl Virus (SqLCV) and other begomoviruses in Saudi Arabia. Dirasat Agric. Sci., 29: 28-36.
    Direct Link

  4. Al-Shehi, A.A. and A.J. Khan, 2013. Identification of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) biotypes and associated bacterial symbionts in Oman. J. Plant Sci., 8: 39-44.

  5. Al-Zahrani, R., 2010. Studies on whiteflies that infect vegetable plants in greenhouses. M.Sc. Thesis, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

  6. Anfoka, G., M. Abhary, F.H. Ahmad, A.F. Hussein and A. Rezk et al., 2008. Survey of tomato yellow leaf curl disease-associated viruses in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin. J. Plant Pathol., 90: 313-322.
    Direct Link

  7. Bosco, D., A. Loria, C. Sartor and J.L. Cenis, 2006. PCR-RFLP identification of Bemisia tabaci biotypes in the Mediterranean basin. Phytoparasitica, 34: 243-251.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Brown, J.K., 1994. The status of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) as a pest and vector in world agroecosystems. FAO Plant Prot. Bull., 42: 3-32.

  9. Brown, J.K., 2010. Phylogenetic Biology of the Bemisia tabaci Sibling Species Group. In: Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest, Stansly, P.A. and S.E. Naranjo (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, UK., ISBN-13: 978-9048124596, pp: 31-67.

  10. Brown, J.K. and J. Bird, 1992. Whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses and associated disorders in the Americas and the Caribbean Basin. Plant Dis., 76: 220-225.
    CrossRef

  11. Brown, J.K., S.A. Coats, I.D. Bedford, P.G. Markham, J. Bird and D. Frohlich, 1995. Characterization and distribution of esterase electromorphs in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Biochem. Genet., 33: 205-214.
    PubMedDirect Link

  12. Brown, J.K., D.R. Frohlich and R.C. Rosell, 1995. The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: Biotypes of Bemisia tabaci or a species complex? Annu. Rev. Entomol., 40: 511-534.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Brown, J.K. and A.M. Idris, 2005. Genetic differentiation of whitefly Bemisia tabaci mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I, and phylogeographic concordance with the coat protein of the plant virus genus Begomovirus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 98: 827-837.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Calvert, L.A., M. Cuervo, J.A. Arroyave, L.M. Constantino, A. Bellotti and D. Frohlich, 2001. Morphological and mitochondrial DNA marker analyses of whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) colonizing cassava and beans in Colombia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 94: 512-519.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Chiel, E., Y. Gottlieb, E. Zchori-Fein, N. Mozes-Daube, N. Katzir, M. Inbar and M. Ghanim, 2007. Biotype-dependent secondary symbiont communities in sympatric populations of Bemisia tabaci. Bull. Entomol. Res., 97: 407-413.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  16. Cifuentes, D., R. Chynoweth and P. Bielza, 2011. Genetic study of Mediterranean and South American populations of tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta (Povolny, 1994) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) using ribosomal and mitochondrial markers. Pest Manage. Sci., 67: 1155-1162.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  17. Czosnek, H. and J.K. Brown, 2010. The Whitefly Genome-White Paper: A Proposal to Sequence Multiple Genomes of Bemisia tabaci. In: Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest, Stansly, P.A. and S.E. Naranjo (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, UK., ISBN-13: 978-9048124596, pp: 503-532.

  18. De Barro, P.J. and F. Driver, 1997. Use of RAPD PCR to distinguish the B biotype from other biotypes of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Aust. J. Entomol., 36: 149-152.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. De Barro. P.J., F. Driver, J.W.H. Trueman and J. Curran, 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of world populations of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) using ribosomal ITS1. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 16: 29-36.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  20. Benson, D.A., M. Cavanaugh, K. Clark, I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D.J. Lipman, J. Ostell and E.W. Sayers, 2013. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 41: D36-D42.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  21. Frohlich, D.R., I. Torres-Jerez, I.D. Bedford, P.G. Markham and J.K. Brown, 1999. A phylogeographical analysis of the Bemisia tabaci species complex based on mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol. Ecol., 8: 1683-1691.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  22. Gill, R.J. and J.K. Brown, 2010. Systematics of Bemisia and Bemisia Relatives: Can Molecular Techniques Solve the Bemisia tabaci Complex Conundrum-A Taxonomist's Viewpoint. In: Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest, Stansly, P.A. and S.E. Naranjo (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, UK., ISBN-13: 978-9048124596, pp: 5-29.

  23. Hadjistylli, M., J.K. Brown and G.K. Roderick, 2010. Tools and recent progress in studying gene flow and population genetics of the Bemisia tabaci sibling species group. In: Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest, Stansly, P.A. and S.E. Naranjo (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, UK., ISBN-13: 978-9048124596, pp: 69-103.

  24. Horowitz, A.R., S. Kontsedalov, V. Khasdan and I. Ishaaya, 2005. Biotypes B and Q of Bemisia tabaci and their relevance to neonicotinoid and pyriproxyfen resistance. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol., 58: 216-225.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  25. Hu, J., P.J. De Barro, H. Zhao, J. Wang, F. Nardi and S.S. Liu, 2011. An extensive field survey combined with a phylogenetic analysis reveals rapid and widespread invasion of two alien whiteflies in China. PLoS One, Vol. 6.
    CrossRef

  26. Khasdan, V., I. Levin, A. Rosner, S. Morin, S. Kontsedalov, L. Maslenin and A.R. Horowitz, 2005. DNA markers for identifying biotypes B and Q of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and studying population dynamics. Bull. Entomol. Res., 95: 605-613.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. Ma, W.H., X.C. Li, T.J. Dennehy, C.L. Lei, M. Wang, B.A. Degain and R.L. Nichols, 2009. Utility of MtCOI polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in differentiating between Q and B whitefly Bemisia tabaci biotypes. Insect Sci., 16: 107-114.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Mazyad, H.M., F. Omer and A. Rahala, 1977. Effect of watermelon mosaic virus on squash in Qatif region, Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the 1st Agriculture Conference of Muslim Scientists, April 10-23, 1977, Riyadh University, Saudi Arabia.

  29. McKenzie, C.L., J.A. Bethke, F.J. Byrne, J.R. Chamberlin and T.J. Dennehy et al., 2012. Distribution of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotypes in North America after the Q invasion. J. Econ. Entomol., 105: 753-766.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  30. Moreno-Delafuente, A., E. Garzo, A. Moreno and A. Fereres, 2013. A plant virus manipulates the behavior of its whitefly vector to enhance its transmission efficiency and spread. PLoS One, Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Oliveira, M.R.V., T.J. Henneberry and P. Anderson, 2001. History, current status and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot., 20: 709-723.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Pusag, J.C.A., S.M.H. Jahan, S.K. Lee, S. Lee and K.Y. Lee, 2012. Upregulation of temperature susceptibility in Bemisia tabaci upon acquisition of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV). J. Insect Physiol., 58: 1343-1348.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Ragab, A., 2013. Genetic variability of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci and its secondary endosymbionts in the Arabian Peninsula. M.Sc. Thesis, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.

  34. Rosell, R.C., I.D. Bedford, D.R. Frohlich, R.J. Gill, J.K. Brown and P.G. Markham, 1997. Analysis of morphological variation in distinct populations of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). System, 90: 575-589.
    Direct Link

  35. Sseruwagi, P., J.P. Legg, M.N. Maruthi, J. Colvin, M.E.C. Rey and J.K. Brown, 2005. Genetic diversity of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) populations and presence of the B biotype and a non-B biotype that can induce silverleaf symptoms in squash, in Uganda. Ann. Applied Biol., 147: 253-265.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. Tahiri, A., F. Halkett, M. Granier, G. Gueguen and M. Peterschmitt, 2013. Evidence of gene flow between sympatric populations of the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 and Mediterranean putative species of Bemisia tabaci. Ecol. Evol., 3: 2619-2633.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Tamura, K., G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski and S. Kumar, 2013. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 30: 2725-2729.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  38. Thompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin and D.G. Higgins, 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res., 25: 4876-4882.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved