INTRODUCTION

Zoonotic diseases are diseases that are transmitted between man and animal under natural conditions. These diseases are in focus due to difficulties faced in prevention of their transmission and spread. Due to factors like increasing population, change in climate and global warming, various diseases are emerging and re-emerging including vector borne and zoonoses viz., tuberculosis, anthrax, brucellosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, rabies, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, chikungunya, bird flu, swine flu, West Nile virus, Hendra virus infections etc. (Taylor et al., 2001; Rogers and Randolph, 2006; Verma et al., 2007, 2008; Jones et al., 2008; Bhatia and Narain, 2010; Kumar et al., 2009, 2012; Myers and Patz, 2009; Mahima et al., 2012a; Dhama et al., 2010a, b, 2011, 2012a, 2013a, b, c). These are adversely affecting animal and human health and posing serious socio-economic threats and huge sufferings (Bhatia and Narain, 2010; Cascio et al., 2011).

Glanders is a highly contagious and fatal disease of horses, donkeys and mules (solipeds) caused by Burkholderia mallei (formerly called as Pseudomonas mallei or Actinobacillus mallei), characterized by nodules and ulcerations in the upper respiratory tract and lungs (Whitlock et al., 2007; OIE, 2008; Larsen and Johnson, 2009; Malik et al., 2010; Burtnick et al., 2012; Saqib et al., 2012; Khan et al., 2013). Its skin affection or subcutaneous form is known as ‘farcy’ (Lehavi et al., 2002). The disease is of high public health significance. Glanders has been eradicated from the developed countries. Due to its ability to infect via inhalation route, B. mallei can be used as a biological weapon and thus has biodefense concern so it should be considered more important from practical point of view (Wheelis, 1998; Lehavi et al., 2002; Horn, 2003; Bojic et al., 2007; Whitlock et al., 2007; Gilad, 2007; Bondi and Goldberg, 2008; Estes et al., 2010; Ricketti et al., 2011; Anderson and Bokor, 2012; Burtnick et al., 2012). During World War I (20th century) B. mallei has been implicated for use as a biological warfare agent.

HISTORY

The disease was first identified by Hippocrates in the 4th century BC (Colahan et al., 1999). Later Aristotle named the disease as malleus which is a Latin word means depicting a malignant disease. In 16th century, William Shakespeare written about glanders in his comedy book called ‘The Taming of the Shrew’ and in 17th century Alexandre Dumas also mentioned about glanders in his novel, ‘The Three Musketeers’ (Wilkinson, 1981). Throughout history glanders has been known by various names including equinia, malleus, droes, morve, pacin, carn and farcy. In 1664, Sollysel in France first recognized the contagious nature of the disease (Howe, 1949; Derbyshire, 2002). Its zoonotic potential was not reported until the beginning of the 19th century. In 1882, Loeffler and Schutz in Germany first time isolated the causative agent of the glanders, Burkholderia mallei (Colahan et al., 1999). In 1890 on the pattern of Koch's tuberculin, Helman from Estonia, Kalning from Latvia and Pearson from USA prepared mallien from cultures of B. mallei which was used for specific diagnostic test (Verma, 1975; Wilkinson, 1981).

Etiology: Burkholderia mallei is a gram negative bacteria, straight or slightly bent (2-5 μ long and 0.3-0.8 μ wide), non-spore forming and facultative intracellular, rod shaped bacterium (Gilad, 2007; Galyov et al., 2010; Estes et al., 2010; Malik et al., 2010). The bacterium is an obligate aerobic (except in media containing nitrate) (DeShazer, 2004). The bacteria grow aerobically and prefer media that contain glycerol as enrichment agent (Evans, 1966). On Glycerol Dextrose Agar (GDA), there was a confluent, slightly cream-coloured growth that was smooth, moist and viscid after 24 h of incubation. With continued incubation, the growth thickened and became darker and tough (Malik et al., 2009). The capsule-like coat has been demonstrated by electron microscopy. The capsule is consisting of neutral carbohydrates and it protects the cell from unfavourable environmental factors. The organisms are closely relative to Burkholderia pseudomallei but B. mallei have no flagellae and are nonmotile (Krieg and Holt, 1984; Sprague and Neubauer, 2004). The organisms are difficult to demonstrate in tissue sections and it has beaded appearance (Miller et al., 1948). In culture media, they vary in appearance depending on the age of the culture and type of medium. The organisms showed much pleomorphism in older cultures. Branching filaments are seen on the surface of broth cultures (Neubauer et al., 2005). B. mallei is sensitive to the external environment and destroyed by exposure to direct sunlight within 24 h and is killed by most of the common disinfectants such as phenol, potassium permanganate, copper sulphate, formalin and chlorine (Howe, 1949; Van der Lugt and Bishop, 2004). The organism could remain viable for 3 to 5 weeks in damp media and decomposing material, may survive for up to 4 weeks in clean water and for about six weeks in contaminated stables (Silva and Dow, 2013).

Susceptible host: Susceptible host species are horses, mules and donkeys, but carnivores like lion may be infected by eating meat. Sheep and goat may also get infection. The natural reservoirs of B. mallei are the Solipeds. Usually the disease is chronic in horses, while it occurs in acute form and often fatal in donkeys and mules often fatal (Wittig et al., 2006; Van Zandt et al., 2013). Laboratory animals are also susceptible to glanders including, hamsters, mice and guinea pigs. This susceptibility makes the basis of the Strauss reaction in the diagnosis of glanders (Fritz et al., 1999, 2000; Lever et al., 2003). Veterinarians, farriers and animal workers are susceptible to this important occupational disease (Howe and Miller, 1947; Georgiades and Fishman, 2001; Srinivasan et al., 2001). Pigs, cattle, sheep, rats and fowl are resistant to infection with B. mallei, but goats, camels, bears, wolfs and dogs can be infected. Both acute and chronic forms as well as latent infections are seen in mules (Minett, 1959; OIE, 2004; Pitt and Dance, 2005).

Mode of transmission in animals: The infection is acquired directly or indirectly from secretions and excretions of infected animals. The disease is chronic in horses and the organisms are found in the lesions and discharges of the skin and nasal mucosa (OIE, 2004, 2008). Acute form of the disease occurs in the mules and donkeys and the organisms are excreted in faeces, urine, saliva and tears (Hunting, 1913; Gulati and Gautam, 1962). Most common route of transmission is respiratory route and ingestion of feed and water contaminated by nasal discharge or sputum of affected animals or direct contact with fomites. Infected animals or recovered animals are the important sources of infection. Severe and rapidly fatal pneumonia occurs after inhalational of B. mallei. Oral and cutaneous route of infections can also produce the disease. Dogs, cats, wild and zoo carnivores acquire the infection from ingestion of infected horse meat (Biberstein and Holzworth, 1987; Wittig et al., 2006; Pawaiya and Chauhan, 2008; Malik et al., 2010).

Epidemiology: The disease is common in Asia, Africa, South America, Eastern Europe and Middle East (Arun et al., 1999). In earlier times, it was more widespread worldwide, but now has been eradicated from most of the areas like Western Europe, Australia and Northern America (Wittig et al., 2006; Slater, 2013; Van Zandt et al., 2013). Glanders was successfully eradicated from Great Britain in 1928 (Stalheim, 1994). In 1934, glanders was officially eradicated in domestic animals in the United States of America (Gregory and Waag, 2007). Earlier it was an important disease, but now has become sporadic but due to recent outbreaks, it has regained the status as re-emerging disease (Khan et al., 2013). From 1998 to 2007, glanders were reported from Brazil, Eritrea, Ethiopia, former U.S.S.R., Iran, Iraq, Mongolia, Turkey and United Arab Emirates (OIE, 2008). In April 2010, Bahrain notified the first occurrence of the disease; in Brazil, the disease reappeared in 2009 (Van Zandt et al., 2013). The incidences of glanders have been reduced over past 100 years due to lesser dependence on horses, mules and donkeys for transportation purposes. Also, strict implementation of testing all these animals for glanders and destroying the positive ones has further reduced the occurrences of glanders.

Indian scenario: During 1808, East India Company appointed Dr. William Moorcroft, a veterinarian, as superintendent of their Bengal Study and he diagnosed glanders, strangles, bursati and anthrax in the horses (Gulati and Gautam, 1962). Major R. D. Verma of Remount Veterinary Corps of Indian Army has reported glanders during the period 1881-84 in the mail cart horses working on Bareilly Cantonment (Verma, 1981). More outbreaks of glanders in the Royal Artillery horses in Nuseerabad and Bombay led to the enactment of Glanders and Farcy Act, 1899 which is still in force in the country (Singh, 1964). The disease was reintroduced in horses that were imported during Indo China War in 1962 without subjecting them to proper testing that resulted in heavy mortality and morbidity among equines (Gulati and Gautam, 1962; Singh, 1964). Ray (1984) reported outbreak in army horses in Gauhati during 1979.

Table 1:	Re-emergence of glanders in India after 1985 outbreak, from 2006 to 2011*
*The serum samples were tested by using complement fixation test (CFT) as per OIE protocol. No human case was reported with any symptom simulating glanders. Table compiled according to data of Malik et al. (2009), Malik et al. (2010) and Malik et al. (2012)

The last three documented outbreaks are Saharanpur from Uttar Pradesh, Hissar and Karnal from Haryana during March, July and September months of 1984, respectively in equine populations (Misra et al., 1985). Kumar et al. (1999) reported the last confirmed case of glanders in a mule from Rohtak, Haryana before the current outbreak. After a long gap, the disease was re-emerged in July, 2006 at Pune and Panchgani area of Maharashtra state, where 23 animals were found positive and have killed about 120 equines. In 2007, disease outbreak occurred at Gautam Buddha Nagar (Anantpur) and Meerut (Mawana) districts of Uttar Pradesh (70 cases) and Kathgodam area in Nainital district of Uttarakhand (21 cases) (Table 1) (Malik et al., 2009, 2010, 2012).

GLANDERS AND FARCY ACT

In 1899 March 20, Governor General of India passed Glanders and Farcy Act, 1899 (Act 13 of 1899) for testing and destruction diseased horses with glanders and the outbreak is notifiable by the veterinary authorities. It was the first act on animal diseases to be propagated in India. It has been now substituted by the Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Diseases in Animals Act, 2009 which was implemented in the country to prevent, control and eradicate the infectious and contagious diseases affecting animals and to meet the international obligations of India for facilitating the importation and exportation of animals animal products as well as to save the human life by introducing quarantine and the elimination of infected animals (Malik et al., 2012). Major problem in the enactment of the law, it provides about Rs. 50 per horse (equivalent to less than 1 US Dollar) for pittance as compensation to the owner for destroying suspected animals (Pawaiya and Chauhan, 2008). This discourages the owners even to disclose any sign of the disease in their animals. As a result, owners in affected areas are not willing to get their animals tested for glanders which ultimately leads to existence of several silent disease carriers which is the major obstacle in eradicating the disease (Pawaiya and Chauhan, 2008). Canada was first country to successfully eradicated glanders as early as in 1938 and in those days they paid about 77 US Dollar per animal compensation for destroying the suspected equine populations (Derbyshire, 2002). The Act was applicable to whole India, but now Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar are following the same rule.

Clinical signs: Symptoms of glanders are dependent upon the route of infection- characterized by pneumonia, septicaemia and chronic suppurative skin infections. The disease occurs in two forms:

POST-MORTEM LESIONS

In acute cases, multiple petechial haemorrhages throughout the body along with catarrhal bronchopneumonia and enlarged bronchial lymph nodes are seen. In lungs, numerous gray, hard, small (2-10 mm) miliary nodules and diffuse pneumonia are found in one or more pulmonary lobes due to hematogenous dissemination. In chronic case, milliary nodules on lung, ulcers on upper respiratory tract, skin of lower limb and abdomen. Pyogranulomatous nodules develop in the nasal which subsequently ulcerate, releasing large amounts of B. mallei organisms into the nasal exudates. Characteristic small multiple nodules are found in the mucosa and surrounded by a narrow hyperaemic halo. The ulcerative lesions in mucosa are healed and replaced by typical stellate or star-shaped fibrous scars. In mild cases, few discrete foci are present in the posterior portions of the nasal cavity and the anterior portions may show only hyperaemia and catarrh. In experimental infections lesions occur in alimentary tract when large amount of organisms are given orally but in natural infections, lesions are rare in alimentary tract (Arun et al., 1999; Fritz et al., 1999; Malik et al., 2010, 2012).

Microscopic lesions: Each nodule is formed by severe cellular infiltration with an inner core of neutrophils and periphery of macrophages. The nodules consist of distinct or semi confluent suppurative cores separated by granulation tissue. Each nodule contains sloughed necrotic tissue results in crateriform ulcer with sharp margin and smooth base (Duval and White, 1907; Arun et al., 1999). In severe cases, ulcers may perforate the septum. In acute cases, ulcerative rhinitis, acute inflammation of nasal mucosa with marked thrombosis of large vessels, infiltration of mucosa and submucosa with neutrophils and macrophages. Lymphadenitis of submaxillary and retropharyngeal nodes is commonly seen (Duval and White, 1907; Jubb et al., 1993; Jones et al., 1997). Ulcerative and rarely pyogranulomatous nodules are seen in the tracheal mucosa. In lungs, pyogranulomatous lesions have necrotic centres containing dead or dying neutrophils; haemorrhagic and fibrinous exudates are seen in acute cases. As the lesions progress, necrotic centres become surrounded by epithelioid cells, giant cells and lymphocytes followed by fibroplastic encapsulation. The core may be gritty because of dystrophic calcification. Metastases to spleen through hematogenous route are common, but less common in other viscera or locomotor organs and these lesions are similar to the pulmonary nodules. In glanders, cutaneouslesions are called equine farcy occurs as a result of severe suppurative lymphangitis characterized by cord-like thickening of the subcutaneous lymphatics referred to as 'farcy pipes' and enlarged lymph nodes in the region of legs, ventral abdomen, face and neck. Eventually, affected lymphatics rupture and release large amounts of tenacious, purulent exudate through sinuses to the surface of the skin. In male animals in addition to other lesions orchitis is also common (Mohammad et al., 1989; Kumar et al., 1999; Malik et al., 2010, 2012).

Pathogenesis: Mucous membranes of eye and nose, gastrointestinal tract and the integument are the natural routes of entry of B. mallei (Howe, 1949; Fritz et al., 1999; Pitt and Dance, 2005). Bacteria penetrate the mucosa from the oropharynx or intestine and crosses via lymph vessels to regional lymph nodes and then to the blood stream and internal organs, particularly the lungs. From there it spreads through blood to cause nasal, cutaneous and nodal lesions (Howe, 1949; Jubb et al., 1993). Through cutaneous entry, the organism moves to the lymphatic tracts resulting in Lymphangitis (Kovalev, 1971). Terminal signs are mainly bronchopneumonia and death is due to anoxic anoxia. In human, the lesions occur in spleen, liver, lymph nodes, skin, skeletal muscles, bones, joints and less commonly in brain, meninges, nose and eye (Howe, 1949; Georgiades and Fishman, 2001). Previously, it was thought that glanders does not affect bone in animals and humans (Duval and White, 1907; Gaiger, 1913) but in later studies bone lesions have been described in mules (Gulati and Gautam, 1962), human (Steele, 1979) and experimental hamsters (Fritz et al., 1999). The main protective mechanism of B. mallei includes intracellular localization and the presence of capsule and capsular lipopolysaccharide to escape phagocytosis (Fritz et al., 2000; DeShazer et al., 2001). Major virulence factor produced by the glanders bacilli in vivo during infections are functional type III secretion system (TTSS) and over-expression of type VI secretion (T6S) protein (Moore et al., 2004). Recent in vitro studies showed that B. mallei organisms significantly influenced the activity of murine macrophages with inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity which is critical for the clearance of bacteria from activated macrophages (Brett et al., 2007; Schell et al., 2007). Romero et al. (2006) reported that B. mallei have an exceptionally high level of genomic alterations upon its short term passage through several mammalian hosts including human. It is the first and only bacterial pathogen to have such ability as till now only RNA viruses were known to possess capacity for consequential rapid genomic variation as a major component of their strategy for escaping the host immune response. This high and rapid genomic variation may upregulate the virulence gene expression in B. mallei during in vivo infection. They also detected the mechanism by which B. mallei escape the immune recognition and phagocytic clearance in vivo by a mutant gene encoding penicillin-binding protein (PBP-1c) that is involved in cell wall synthesis and β-lactum resistance. B. mallei are maintained as a population of variant or mutant organisms inside the host but not as a clonal population like other organisms. Such genomic instability upon passage could have implications for vaccine development and treatment of glanders (Romero et al., 2006).

Zoonotic potential of glanders and its public health significance: Glander is a zoonotic disease (Dvorak and Spickler, 2008; Malik et al., 2010; Varga et al., 2012). Even though infection rates of 30% in horses in China during World War II and 5-25% in Mongolia, few or no human cases occurred (Romero et al., 2006). In 1793, a first human case of glanders was reported in the French veterinarian Dr. Charles Vial de Sainbel, the first Principal of London Veterinary College and subsequently he died (Hunting, 1913; Wilkinson, 1981). Recently, clinical glanders appeared in a 33 year old microbiologist at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute (USAMRIID) for Infectious Diseases in March 2000 and treated successfully (Srinivasan et al., 2001). In India, information on human glanders is scanty despite many reported cases of disease in equines. The only authentic case was of Gaiger (1913), a veterinary pathologist at Punjab Veterinary College, Lahore who contracted the disease while autopsying an infected horse and himself underwent 45 operations including amputation of an arm before he died. This bacterium has been listed as potential agent for biological warfare and bioterrorism under CDC category B (Wittig et al., 2006). Man is also susceptible to infection which is usually fatal with a very high mortality rate of 90-95% in untreated septicaemic infections and 50% mortality rate in treated humans. Transmission of B. mallei from animals to humans is generally not seen commonly. Person to person transmission is also a rare event. Human epidemics have not occurred but isolated outbreaks have been documented.

Occupational exposure is the main risk factor to veterinarians, farmers, horse traders/fanciers, laboratory workers and other personnels working in stable, slaughterhouses and soldiers. Close contact with high concentrations of virulent bacterium poses a higher risk for infection. Ingestion of B. mallei contaminated food and water is not an important route of human infections (Kovalev, 1971; Van Zandt et al., 2013). Routes of transmission B. mallei in humans include direct invasion of cut, abraded or lacerated skin, inhalation and by attack to mucous membranes (nasal, oral and conjunctiva) (Dvorak and Spickler, 2008; Van Zandt et al., 2013). The organism is unable to penetrate normal/intact skin. Zoonotic infections arise from contact with infected animals or with B. mallei cultures in laboratory (CDC, 2000; Varga et al., 2012; Van Zandt et al., 2013). In two cases sexually transmission of glanders also reported. Humans can develop four forms of clinical disease, i.e., acute, chronic, pulmonary, septicemic and disseminated forms of the disease are observed. Clinical signs of Glanders in humans are non-specific which is the main factor hindering accurate diagnosis and treatment. Incubation period of 1-14 days is observed in acute form while in chronic form it is up to 12 weeks (Whitlock et al., 2007). A localized infection is seen with swelling of the affected area and a weeping discharge (ulcerating and draining abscesses) in the initial phase, followed by an acute pulmonary infection/pneumonic disease. Septicemia is seen in glanders. The infection is fatal at 2-4 weeks in untreated cases.

This pathogen cause major destructive effect on human health because of its ability to cause opportunistic infections in diabetic and perhaps otherwise immunocompromised persons (Estes et al., 2010). Symptoms in humans include low-grade fever and chills, malaise, fatigue, myalgias, backache, headache, rigors, chest pain and lymphadenopathy. Others may be excessive lacrimation, photophobia, inflammation/swelling of the nose, copious nasal discharge, facial swelling and pneumonic signs of bronchitis with cough and mucopurulent sputum, dyspnea. Papular lesions erupting on the body are seen in cutaneous forms. Glanders node is seen as a single blister developing into an ulcer, discharge and lymphangitis. In pulmonary infection, pneumonia, pulmonary abscess, pleuritis and plural effusions are observed. Dissemination of the infection gives rise to septicemia, internal organs (spleen, liver and lungs) gets colonized with the bacteria and abscesses develop with septic shock and high mortality. The septicaemic form of glanders has a high mortality rate in humans; the case fatality rate is 95% in untreated cases and in treated cases it is more than 50%. When treated with antibiotics, mortality rate for localized disease is 20%. The overall mortality rate is 40%. However, survival is possible if the infected person is treated early and aggressively with multiple systemic antibiotic therapies (Srinivasan et al., 2001; Bossi et al., 2004; Rega, 2007).

Biological warfare and bioterrorism of glanders: Burkhoideria mallei are a group B biothreat agent and are a host-adapted pathogen (Chandler and Landrigan, 2004). Due to the high mortality rate in humans and the small number of organisms required to establish infection, it is regarded as a potential biological warfare or bioterrorism agent along with closely related B. pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis. During the 1st World War, large numbers of Russian horses and mules on the Eastern Front was intentionally infected with glanders by Germans (Wheelis, 1998; Alibek and Handelman, 1999). This severely affected the troop and supply convoys, artillery movement which are dependent on horses and mules. Subsequently, the human cases in Russia increased with the infections during and after World War I (Bossi et al., 2004). During World War II Japan intentionally infected horses, civilians and prisoners of war with glanders at the Pinfang Institute, China (Rega, 2007). In China, during World War II, 30% of the tested horses were infected with glanders, but human cases were rare. The U.S. studied this agent as a possible biological warfare weapon in 1943-44, but they did not weaponize it. The Soviet Union is also interested in glanders as a potential biological warfare agent after World War II. If this organism is aerosolized during a biological attack or in a laboratory accident, the morbidity rate could reach very high. Its use as a biological weapon is now banned under the international Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction (Rosebury and Kabat, 1947; Woods, 2005; Wittig et al., 2006; Pawaiya and Chauhan, 2008).

Diagnosis: Isolation of B. mallei and its authenticated identification employing diagnostic tests are required for definitive diagnosis of glanders. Diagnosis is based on the following methods.

Laboratory diagnosis
Samples to be taken: Clinical samples to be collected include pus from open ulcers, lungs, choanal and organ abscesses, nasal mucosa or necropsy material. Nasal swabs, lymph node biopsy, serum sample 2-5 mL aseptically are collected in sterile vial and send it on ice with cold chain for laboratory testing. Samples are often contaminated with other bacterial species like Pseudomonas and Pasteurella which makes isolation very difficult. Subcutaneous abscesses contain good numbers of the pathogen whereas ulcers are usually free of B. mallei. Glanders is a zoonotic disease; all samples must be handled with great care in a laboratory that meets the requirements for containment group-3 pathogens. Serious concerns exist over the conditions and justification for carrying out necropsy of suspected cases (Malik et al., 2009, 2012).

Demonstration of organism in smear: Organisms are in enough number in smear prepared from pus. It should be stained by methylene blue or Gram stain. Bacteria are Gram-negative rods with rounded ends.

Isolation and identification of agent: Bacteria are aerobic and facultative anaerobic. It requires 72 h incubation on glycerol agar.

Laboratory animal inoculation: Guinea-pigs, hamsters and cats are the suitable experimental models. Suspected sample should be inoculated intraperitoneally in male guinea pig. In positive cases, there is development of severe orchitis and inflammation of scrotal sac (Strauss reaction). This reaction is not confirmatory to glanders, because some other organism may also cause this reaction, so the material from infected testes should be processed for bacteriological identification.

MALLEIN TEST

It is a prescribed test for international trade. It is used to detect chronic infections, carriers or occult cases. The major disadvantage, it is not 100% specific and a fair margin of error is always associated with the test (Verma, 1975). Mallein is Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) that is prepared from protein fractions of B. mallei after heat treatment. Recently, ultrafiltration in a Tangential Flow Filtration system (TFF) was used as new method of production of mullein (De Carvalho Filho et al., 2012). Mallein test is an allergic test which is most frequently used, along with complement fixation test (De Carvalho Filho et al., 2012), for diagnosing glanders in endemic areas, wherein a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction as observed during tuberculosis/tuberculin testing can be seen. This test is not recommended for diagnosis of glanders in humans:

Serological tests: Various tests viz., Complement Fixation Test (CFT), agglutination test, indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), ELISA, avidin-biotin dot ELISA. Among these, mallein and CFT are prescribed tests for international trade of equines. CFT is 90-95% accurate and positive result is obtained within one week of infection and remains positive in chronic cases. CFT has been the preferred and most extensively used diagnostic tool because of its capacity to detect clinically inapparent carriers and chronically infected horses (Neubauer et al., 2005). However, ELISA has been found to be comparable with CGT in terms of sensitivity and specificity (Sprague et al., 2009). However, none of these procedures are sensitive enough to differentiate serologically between B. mallei and B. pseudomallei.

Molecular tests: Use of molecular tests like PCR (Scholz et al., 2006; Grishkina and Samygin, 2010) and real time PCR (Thibault et al., 2004a; U'Ren et al., 2005; Ulrich et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2012) are found suitable for determination of generic, inter and intraspecies characteristics of bacteria. Recently, multiplex PCR and qPCR has been developed for rapid and reliable detection and differentiation of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei (B. pseudomallei is the cause of melioidosis in humans and animals) (Lee et al., 2005; Koh et al., 2012; Janse et al., 2013). A 5' nuclease real-time PCR assay is used for rapid identification and simultaneous screening of B. mallei and B. pseudomallei and is also used for rapid and most specific identification and detection of B. mallei in clinical samples by targeting flagellin P gene, fliP. The assay is most sensitive which detects 60 fg of B. mallei DNA in the clinical samples from diseased horses. The technique has not yet been fully validated for wide acceptance (Tomaso et al., 2004, 2006). RAPD, ribotyping as well as of plasmid and DNA microrestriction analyses, Intact cell Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation mass spectrometric typing has also been described recently for rapid identification/detection of B. mallei (Antonov and Iliukhin, 2005; Karger et al., 2012).

Diagnosis of glanders in humans: It is mainly diagnosed by isolation and identification of B. mallei. In septicemic form, blood cultures may be negative until just before death. Commonly used serologic tests are agglutination and complement fixation tests (Cravitz and Miller, 1950). High background titers can be found in normal serum and cross-reactions may occur with B. pseudomallei, the causative agent of Melioidosis (Neubauer et al., 2005). Positive reactions in agglutination tests develop only after 7 to 10 days. In imaging studies, chest radiography and computer assisted tomography (CT) may demonstrate miliary nodules, bilateral bronchopneumonia, cavitating lesions, segmental and lobar infiltrates (Georgiades and Fishman, 2001).

Advances in diagnostic tools and techniques need to be exploited fully for rapid and confirmatory diagnosis of the disease especially heightening the surveillance and monitoring programmes which would help design effective disease prevention and control programmes (Schmitt and Henderson, 2005; Bollo, 2007; Deb and Chakraborty, 2012; Dhama et al., 2012b, 2013d, e; Deb et al., 2013).

Treatment
In animals: According to Glander and Farcy Act, 1899 affected animals must be destroyed and disposed off safely and is a notifiable disease (Malik et al., 2010). For eradication, affected animals should not be treated because it may result in carrier state. Sodium sulfadiazine is reported to be effective in hamsters. Doxycycline and ciprofloxacin have also been found to be useful. Therapeutic regimens for glanders require prolonged course of treatment, usually treatment should be continued for 20 days or more (Al-Izzi and Al-Bassam, 1989; Manzeniuk et al., 1994; Saqib et al., 2012). Use of formalin killed B. mallei and sulfadiazine, or mallein and sulfadimidine, are found effective in horses (Batmanov, 1993). Use of drugs in acute form of glanders in equines increases the lifespan (Iliukhin et al., 2012). Use of antibiotics in liposomal forms of antibiotics was found to be more effective in in vitro studies (Iliukhin et al., 2012). The treatment in horses includes single or combination use of antibiotics like Ceftazidime, Sulfadiazine, Trimethoprim+Sulfamethoxazol, Gentamicin, Imipenem etc (Lehavi et al., 2002). As the cost of therapy is too high, so it can only be used in precious horses, but it should not replace the “test and slaughter policy” (Saqib et al., 2012).

In humans: Recently, the prophylactic usefulness of Co-trimoxazole for B. mallei has been suggested in humans. Treatment with sulfonamides (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TMP-SMX) has been recommended.

Table 2:	Antibiotics for treatment of glanders in humans

Recently, Piperacillin/tazobactum as an alternative for currently used drug ceftazidime (Table 2) for the treatment of both glanders and melioidosis in view of the emergence of ceftazidime-resistant clinical isolates in Southeast Asia (Thibault et al., 2004b; Van Zandt et al., 2013).

PREVENTION AND CONTROL

No human or veterinary vaccines are available for immunization/prevention of Glanders (Estes et al., 2010; Burtnick et al., 2012). The immune evading strategy and genomic fluidity of this complex pathogen have made the use of live vaccine unsatisfactory (Nierman et al., 2004; Romero et al., 2006). Efforts need to be made for identifying broadly protective antigens, efficient vaccine delivery/adjuvant systems and an exploring protection from both acute and chronic infections which would altogether pave way for the development of effective vaccine for B. mallei (Bondi and Goldberg, 2008). Experimentally, two live attenuated strains of B. mallei, a capsule mutant and a branched-chain amino acid auxotroph which is genetically engineered mutant of B. mallei using newly constructed allelic exchange vector, as vaccines in mice. The auxotrophic mutant was found to enhance the Th1 response and with a survival rate of 25% for one month post-challenge in comparison to control where none survived beyond five days (Ulrich et al., 2005). The 6-deoxy-heptan Capsular Polysaccharide (CPS) of B. mallei, having both a pathogenic determinant and a protective antigen, is being exploited for developments of novel vaccine against glanders (Burtnick et al., 2012).

Clinical and serological recovery is rare, recovered animals are also not immune, so every animal positive for glanders should be destroyed and remaining animals should be retested at intervals of 3 weeks until all reactors have been removed:

Employing the new generation developments and progress in vaccines and vaccinology, safer and effective vaccines need to be focused for countering this important disease having high zoonotic potential (Paul-Pierre, 2009; Dhama et al., 2008, 2013f). Judicious application of drugs and alternative and novel/emerging therapeutic modalities should also be kept in mind for treating glanders (Mahima et al., 2012b; Dhama et al., 2013g, h; Tiwari et al., 2013a, b, c). Nowadays, one health and one medicine approach is being given due importance to counter deadly pathogens, emerging/re-emerging infectious diseases and their zoonotic threats which need to be applied from all aspects for combating glanders (Kahn et al., 2007; Dhama et al., 2013i).