|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Effect of Low Phosphorus Stress on Endogenous Hormone Levels of Different
Maize Genotypes in Seedling Stage
|
|
Yaou Shen,
Yongzhong Zhang,
Haijian Lin,
Shibin Gao
and
Guangtang Pan
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
The study was aimed at revealing the effect of low phosphorus
stress on endogenous hormone levels of maize lines and displaying the different
regulars of hormone change under phosphorus starvation between high P-efficient
lines and low P-efficient lines, as well as providing the theoretical foundation
for identifying high P-efficient lines at the seedling stage. In the present
research, two high P-efficient inbred lines of maize 178 and 129, two low P-efficient
ones 9782 and 202, with the F1 generation of 178 and 9782 were conducted to
assay for the dynamic change of endogenous hormones in immature leaves and roots
under low-phosphorus treatment by the method of solution culture, sand culture
and field cultivation. As a result, all of the hormones except ABA were observed
more abundant in the high P-efficient lines and F1 hybrid than the low P-efficient
lines. The contents of zeatin in leaves and roots decreased significantly by
the stress of phosphorus starvation under all of the environments, contrarily
the contents of gibberellic acid (GA3), Indol-3-acetic acid (IAA) and Abscisic
Acid (ABA) increased after suffering the low-P stress. In addition, the change
ranges of GA3 and IAA were greater in high P-efficient lines 178, 129 and the
F1 hybrid than in low P-efficient 9782 line and 202 line, whereas it is the
opposite case for Zeatin (ZT) and Abscisic Acid (ABA) contents. However, no
significant difference of every hormone change was observed between the two
high P-efficient inbred lines as well as the two low P-efficient ones. Which
indicated that the distinction of the hormone sensibilities to phosphorus starvation
were just specifically present among the lines with different P-availability
and can be considered as an important reference basis for identifying phosphorus
efficiency of maize lines. Each of the hormones in the F1 hybrid always displayed
the highest or the lowest values among all the lines, indicating the heterobeltiosis
of F1 generation in response to low starvation. So the method of cross breeding
can be considered to applied to breeding higher P-efficient lines of maize.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: May 30, 2012;
Accepted: July 03, 2012;
Published: September 06, 2012
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Phosphorus (P), an essential macronutrient for plant growth, provides indispensable
substance foundation to agricultural production (Nagarajan
et al., 2011). As a kind of non-renewable resources, phosphorus in
the earth was suggested to supply the demand for only 50 to 400 years, due to
overexploitation by human beings (Wang and Li, 1998).
The shortage of phosphorus will become a worldwide resource crisis in the near
future. At the present time currently, P deficiency has been a serious problem
in 43% of the worlds total cultivated land (Liu and
Li, 1994). Even worse is that no mineral element is found to be able to
displace phosphorus in agricultural production so far. So illustrating the mechanism
of phosphorus utilization and creating more high P-efficient plants is a necessary
strategy for relieving the pressure from P shortage (Rausch
and Bucher, 2002).
There is significant difference on phosphorus efficiency among various plant
species, as well as different genotypes from the same species based on genetic
variation (Buso and Bliss, 1988). Smith
(1934) screened 24 inbred lines and 23 single crosses of maize to determine
the relative amount of growth with various limitations of phosphorus. The results
showed there were significantly differential responses among them when grown
on a medium in low phosphorus (Smith, 1934). Similar
evidence was found in the research on wheat, rice, sorghum and other species
(Gabelman and Loughman, 1987). These findings provide
important materials and evidence for studying physiologic and genetic mechanism
of phosphorus efficiency. As well known to us, endogenous hormones participate
in many of physiologic process in plant growth and act as signal substances
when plants encounter environmental stress (Srivastava, 2002).
The effect of different phosphorus concentrations on growth and physiology characteristics
of barley have been identified which revealed that the P-starvation led to increased
IAA and GA3 content and decreased IPA content in roots and leaves. However no
significant change was observed for ABA content by low-P stress (Liu
and Wang, 2003). Similar conclusion has been also demonstrated in the research
of cotton (Wang et al., 2008). It is suggested
that the effects of P stress on the growth of barley and cotton may be associated
with the changes of endogenous hormones in the plants.
But the dynamic change of endogenous hormones in maize under low-P stress is
still unclear. And it is unknown whether different responses of endogenous hormones
are present among various P-efficiency genotypes. In the research, two high
P-efficient inbred lines and two low P-efficient ones, with their cross F1 were
conducted to assay for the dynamic change of endogenous hormones in immature
leaves and roots under low-phosphorus stress under the condition of solution
culture, sand culture and field cultivation. It will help to understand the
mechanism on hormone response to low P-efficient in maize and afford us an advantageous
and convenient method for identifying high P-efficient lines in early growth
period of maize.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was performed in Maize Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural
University, Yaan city of China.
The time duration of the research was about eight months from March to October
in 2011.
Solution culture: The seeds of maize (Zea mays L.) were sown
on filter paper saturated with distilled water and incubated at 26°C in
the dark. Three days later, seedlings selected for uniform growth were transplanted
into an aerated complete nutrient solution (Table 1) and kept
for 3 d in a growth chamber with a photoperiod of 14 h light/10 h dark at 26°C
and relative humidity of 70%. Then these seedlings were randomly divided into
two groups (each group includes three replicates), one of which was transferred
to a fresh solution same to the above (normal-P level, NP), the other was transplanted
into an incomplete solution with only 1 μM phosphorus (low-P level, LP),
in which the other compositions were identical to the former.
Sand culture: Twelve plants were grown in two rows for every of the
above line, with 15 cm row distance, 6.7 cm plant distance. Which was designed
for two replicates and each one was randomly ordered.
Table 1: |
Gradient elution program |
 |
There was only the difference of monoammonium phosphate on fertilizer for
LP and NP, with 8 g (NH4)2HPO4 to NP and no
to LP in each hill. The other fertilizer was used on normal levels.
Field cultivation: Maize lines were planted in Xiali town of Yaan
City, where the content of efficient phosphorus in soil is lower than 10 mg
kg-1. Twelve plants were grown in a row for every of the above lines,
with 50 cm row distance, 33 cm plant distance. Three replicates were designed
with randomly order. Sixty kilograms of phosphorus was fertilized in per square
hectometer field for NP, no P for LP. Field management and the other fertilizer
were in accordance with normal levels.
At six-leaf stage, about 2.0 g roots and leaves were respectively conducted
to screen for endogenous hormone content using HPLC.
Determining of endogenous hormone content: About 2.0 g tissue was put
into a cooled mortar, added with 15 mL 80% methanol and grinded into homogenate,
kept still at 4°C for 12 h. Then the homogenate was centrifugalized at 5000
rpm for 5 min and the supernatant fluid was saved at 4°C. The remainder
was conducted to the above steps for three times. All of the supernatant was
mixed and concentrated to 10 mL volume at 35°C, appended with 0.1 g Polyvinylpyrolidone
(PVPP) to remove pigments and phenols. After being mixed for 1 h and centrifugalized
at 4°C at 10000 rpm for 15 min, the crude extract of endogenous hormone
was collected from the supernatant. Every 30 mL extracting solution was transferred
into a culture dish with 9 cm diameter and dried by a freeze drier. Each dish
was dissolved by methanol for three times and the solution was transferred to
a 10 mL volumetric flask with constant volume. After filtered by 0.22 μm
membrane, the solution was subjected to determine the content of endogenous
hormone.
The content of endogenous hormone was determined using high performance liquid
chromatograph Agilent 1 100 LC, with chromatographic column Hypersil ODSC18.
The mixture of methanol and acetic acid were used as moving phase and gradient
elution program was showed in Table 1. The other conditions
were as follows: column temperature of 35°C, sample size of 10 μL,
flow speed of 1 mL min-1 and 254 nm wavelength. The External Standard
Method was applied to calculate hormone content.
RESULTS
Decreased zeatin content under low-P stress at seedling: For every of
the culture conditions, zeatin in roots and leaves was both decreased under
low-P stress but the reduction range was larger in roots than leaves concerning
all of the maize lines (Fig. 1). Which indicated that zeatin
in roots is more sensitive than in leaves to P starvation stress. There were
also significant difference of Zeatin content between high P-efficient inbred
lines (HPELs) and low P-efficient inbred lines (LPELs) under normal condition.
It was embodied in higher zeatin level in HPELs and lower level in LPELs. For
example, under the condition of normal P-level solution culture, Zeatin in the
leaves of 178 and 129 L were, respectively 165 ng g-1 FW and 185
ng g-1 FW but only 125 ng g-1 FW and 110 ng g-1
FW in line 9782 and 202. Similar data was found in the roots of the above lines.
Interestingly, zeatin contents both in leaves and roots fell to lower levels
in LPELs than in HPELs and F1 without exception. It suggested that keeping zeatin
on a relatively high level would be a co-characteristic for HPELs. Additionally,
zeatin contents appeared more steady under field cultivation than the other
cultures, when encountering low-P stress.
A little increased GA3 in HPELs under P starvation condition:
Under the normal condition, GA3 in the three HPELs was far higher
than that in all of the LPELs and the F1 hybrid possessed the largest GA3
content among the lines (Fig. 2). Compared to zeatin, GA3
content in all the lines changed more faintly after low-P stress under the three
conditions. For instance, there was an up-regulation by less than 2% of GA3
content in line 178s root and
leaf on low-P level. But significant difference of change range was still found
between LPELs and HPELs. As for HPELs, GA3 contents in roots and
leaves rose significantly with no exception, whereas no distinct increase was
observed for LPELs. However, there was no difference of increase range among
the different cultures, also between roots and leaves. It is suggested that
failing to promote signal transduction by GA3 is an important reason
for the impaired growth and development of LPELs under P-limited circumstances.
As for HPELs, a little increased GA3 may transmit a signal of P starvation
to plants, promoting the timely regulation of root architecture to response
to P deficiency.
|
Fig. 1: |
Zeatin content change in different culture conditions with
low-P stress, L: Leaf, R: Root |
|
Fig. 2: |
GA3 content change in different culture conditions with low-P
stress, L: Leaf, R: Root |
|
Fig. 3: |
IAA content change in different culture conditions with low-P
stress, L: Leaf, R: Root |
|
Fig. 4: |
ABA content change in different culture conditions with low-P
stress, L: Leaf, R: Root |
Increase of IAA between LPELs and HPELs under P-deficient stress: Similar
to GA3, there was also great disparity on IAA content among LPELs,
HPELs and F1 hybrid under normal condition (Fig. 3). The content
in F1 was the largest, then followed by HPELs and the smallest in LPELs. Additionally,
IAA was always more abundant in leaves than in roots for a given line. Under
low-P stress, increasing degree of IAA contents in F1 and HPELs were far higher
than those in LPELs. Concerning various culture conditions, there was very similar
increasing trend of IAA content between solution and sand culture. But the determined
IAA content under the condition of solution culture was much less than ones
in sand culture and field cultivation. Whereas, IAA of the plants cultivated
in fields is the most insensitive to low-P stress among the three culture condition.
The probable cause was that the actual phosphorus level in field circumstance
was higher than what in solution and sand condition because of the existence
of the inherent phosphorus in soil.
Increased ABA in LPELs than HPELs under low-P stress: There was also
remarkable difference on ABA content among LPELs, HPELs and F1 hybrid in normal-P
level which was embodied in the lowest in F1 hybrid, the second in HPELs, the
highest in LPELs (Fig. 4). After suffering low-P stress, ABA
increasing range in LPELs was larger than in HPELs and F1 hybrid for all of
the culture conditions. It is suggested that ABA in LPELs is more sensitive
to low-P stress. On the other hand, ABA is always more abundant in leaves than
in roots for a given line at the same phosphorus levels. But the increasing
extents in roots were higher than in leaves for every of the maize lines. Which
revealed that ABA in maize roots is more susceptible to P starvation than the
one in leaves. Moreover, the values of ABA content determined under field circumstance
were unanimously larger than both solution and sand culture. Whereas, the change
tendency of them is consistent among the three culture environments.
|
Fig. 5(a-d): |
Correlations of hormone (a) Zeatin, (b) GA3, (c) IAA and
(d) ABA of low-P to normal-P ratios between solution and sand culture |
Correlations of hormone ratios of LP to NP between solution culture and
sand culture: To validate the correctness of determined hormone contents,
all the hormone ratios of low-P level to normal-P level was submitted to the
software of correlation analysis (https://www.wessa.net/rwasp_correlation.wasp?outtype=Browser%20Black/White#output)
(Shen et al., 2012). As shown in Fig.
5, a strong correlation (all Pearsons correlation more than 0.90)
was revealed between the data from solution culture and those from sand culture
(a, b, d) except for the IAA ratios (Fig. 5c, R2
= 0.81) which indicated a good concordance of both the methods. The lower correlation
coefficient of IAA ratios may suggest IAA content is more susceptible to environment.
DISCUSSION
Phosphorus is a constituent of important organic compounds. It is commonly
assumed that the effects of varying levels of phosphorus on plant growth can
be directly related to its ability for basic anabolic processes such as protein,
nucleic acid and membrane synthesis (EI-D et al.,
1979). To response to such variations, plants have evolved complex sensing
and signaling mechanisms that allow them to monitor the external and internal
concentration of phosphorus. Recent evidences have shown that hormones participate
in the control of these regulatory networks (Rubio et
al., 2009).
Zeatin, a sort of cytokinins which promote cell division or cytokinesis in
plant roots and shoots and were ever proved to play opposite roles in plant
lateral root formation (Lohar et al., 2004).
In our study, phosphorus deficiencies resulted in reduced zeatin which is in
agreement with those of the earlier studies of Kulaeva (1962),
Wagner and Michael (1971) and EI-D
et al. (1979), who all found reduced cytokinin levels were associated
with mineral deficiency. Moreover, the increased lateral root number and length
was observed under low-P stress. Based on the above findings, it is proposed
that cytokinin production may be related to P nutrition. Phosphorus deficiency
in roots leads to decrease of zeatin in roots, resulting in increased maize
lateral roots consequently. On the other hand, zeatin decrease ranges in all
the HPELs were smaller than those in LPELs which suggests P availability is
also able to change the zeatin level. When encountering low-P stress, HPELs
improved P uptake to increase available phosphorus, minimizing the reduction
range of zeatin in roots.
GA3 is a simple gibberellin, a tetracyclic diterpene acid promoting
growth and elongation of cells. Biosynthesis of GA is regulated by these genes
CPS, KS, KO, GA3ox1 and GA20ox1 (Devaiah et al.,
2009). Previous research revealed that GA3 could promote plant
root growth by influencing root cell elongation (Jiang et
al., 2007). The role of GA has been proven to be implicated in P starvation
response. The cross-talk between P starvation stress and GA biosynthesis via
transcript factor MYB62 was also demonstrated in Arabidopsis. P starvation
resulted in down-regulation of MYB62 and subsequent up-regulation of the above
genes required for GA biosynthesis consequently. Which, lead to vital modifications
in plants required for survival under P deficiency (Devaiah
et al., 2009). In the present research, a little increased GA3
content was observed in both HPELs and LPELs. The results are in accordance
with the findings on barley and cotton study (Liu and Wang,
2003; Wang et al., 2008), confirming the
cross-talk between low-P stress and GA3 in maize. Additionally, GA3
increase range in HPELs was higher than in LPELs under low-P stress, indicating
that the former was superior to the latter on regulating root architecture and
promote primary roots growth after suffering P deficiency.
IAA is the most important member of auxin family and essential for plant body
development, having a cardinal role in coordination of many growth and behavioral
processes in the plant's life cycle (Teale et al.,
2006). Although the IAA biosynthetic pathway in plants has not yet been
determined with certainty, a large body of evidence has accumulated showing
that plants convert Trp to IAA via several parallel pathways with these enzymes,
YUCCA and CYP79/CYP79B3 involved (Yamamoto
et al., 2007). Miura et al. (2011)
proposed hyperaccumulation of auxin facilitates low-P induced root of Arabidopsis
architecture remodeling (Miura et al., 2011).
Similar data was observed on Lupinus albus under phosphorus deficiency
(Shen et al., 2008). Which are consistent with
our research findings. It is suggested that P starvation may cause the change
of the enzymes such as YUCCA and CYP79/CYP79B3
and lead to increase of IAA in root consequently. The difference of IAA change
range between HPELs and LPELs may account for the distinction of P availability
between them.
ABA functions in many plant developmental processes. ABA-mediated signalling
plays an important part in plant responses to environmental stresses, such as
drought, chilling, high salinity, phosphate deficiency and nitrate enrichment
(Zhu, 2002). An increased ABA content was considered
to be beneficial for plants under environmental stress as a result of ABA-induced
changes at the cellular and whole-plant levels (Xiong and
Zhu, 2003). ABA promotes the closure of stomata to minimize transpirational
water loss. It also mitigates stress damage through the activation of many stress-responsive
genes that encode enzymes for the biosynthesis of compatible osmolytes and LEA-like
proteins which collectively increase plant stress tolerance (Hasegawa
et al., 2000; Bray, 2002; Sharp
and LeNoble, 2002). These evidences support our observation in the study.
The regulation process of ABA biosynthesis has been illustrated. In the pathway,
phosphoprotein cascade is a series of important P-proteins affecting ABA biosynthesis
(Xiong and Zhu, 2003). It is proposed that low-P stress
may lead to, first of all, the change of the phosphoprotein cascade, then result
in ABA increase.
Three different medium cultures were adopted in the study, receiving accordant
results about hormone change ranges, verifying the correctness on experimental
data.
CONCLUSION
By the research distinct change ranges of the endogenous hormones were observed
between high P-efficient inbred lines and low P-efficient ones of maize when
they encountered the stress of P starvation. However, no significant difference
of each hormone change was detected between the two high P-efficient inbred
lines as well as the two low P-efficient ones. Which indicated that the distinction
of the hormone sensibilities to phosphorus starvation were just specifically
present among the lines with different P-availability and can be considered
as an important reference basis for identifying phosphorus efficiency of maize
lines at the seedling stage. Each of the hormones in the F1 hybrid always displayed
the highest or the lowest values among all the lines, indicating the heterobeltiosis
of F1 generation in response to low starvation. So the method of cross breeding
can be considered to applied to breeding higher P-efficient lines of maize.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(grant No. 30971796 and 30900901).
|
REFERENCES |
1: Bray, E.A., 2002. Abscisic acid regulation of gene expression during water-deficit stress in the era of the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell Environ., 25: 153-161. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
2: Buso, G.S.C. and F.A. Bliss, 1988. Varibility among lettuce cultivars grown at two levels of available phosphorus. Plant Soil, 111: 67-73. CrossRef | Direct Link |
3: Devaiah, B.N., R. Madhuvanthi, A.S. Karthikeyan and K.G. Raghothama, 2009. Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant, 2: 43-58. CrossRef | Direct Link |
4: Gabelman, W.H. and B.C. Loughman, 1987. Genetic aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Dev. Plant Soil Sci., 27: 287-298.
5: Hasegawa, P.M., R.A. Bressan, J.K. Zhu and H.J. Bohnert, 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 51: 463-499. CrossRef | Direct Link |
6: Jiang, C.F., X.H. Gao, L.L. Liao, N.P. Harberd and X.D. Fu, 2007. Phosphate starvation root architecture and anthocyanin accumulation responses are modulated by the gibberellin-DELLA signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 145: 1460-1470. Direct Link |
7: Kulaeva, O.N., 1962. The effect of roots on leaf metabolism in relation to the action of kinetin in leaves. Soviet Plant Physiol., 9: 182-189.
8: Liu, J.Z. and Z.S. Li, 1994. Utilization of plant potentialities to enhance the bio-efficiency of phosphorus in soil Eco-Agric. Res., 2: 16-23.
9: Liu, H. and S.G. Wang, 2003. Influences of P deficiency stress on endogenous hormones in barley. J. Southwest Agric. Univ., 25: 48-52.
10: Lohar, D.P., J.E. Schaff, J.G. Laskey, J.J. Kieber, K.D. Bilyeu and D.M. Bird, 2004. Cytokinins play opposite roles in lateral root formation and nematode and rhizobial symbioses. Plant J., 38: 203-214. CrossRef | PubMed |
11: Miura, K., J. Lee, Q. Gong, S. Ma and J.B. Jin et al., 2011. SIZ1 regulation of phosphate starvation-induced root architecture remodeling involves the control of auxin accumulation. Plant Physiol., 155: 1000-1012. Direct Link |
12: Nagarajan, V.K., A. Jain, M.D. Poling, A.J. Lewis, K.G. Raghothama and A.P. Smith, 2011. Arabidopsis Pht1;5 mobilizes phosphate between source and sink organs and influences the interaction between phosphate homeostasis and ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol., 156: 1149-1163. PubMed |
13: Rausch, C. and M. Bucher, 2002. Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants. Planta, 216: 23-37. CrossRef | PubMed |
14: Rubio, V., R. Bustos, M.L. Irigoyen, X. Cardona-Lopez, M. Rojas-Triana and J. Paz-Ares, 2009. Plant hormones and nutrient signaling. Plant Mol. Biol., 69: 361-373. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
15: EI-D, A.M.S.A., A. Salama and P.F. Wareing, 1979. Effects of mineral nutrition on endogenous cytokinins in plants of sunflower. J. Exp. Bot., 30: 971-981. CrossRef | Direct Link |
16: Sharp, R.E. and M.E. LeNoble, 2002. ABA, ethylene and the control of shoot and root growth under water stress. J. Exp. Bot., 53: 33-37. CrossRef | Direct Link |
17: Shen, J., L. Cheng, J. Liu, F. Zhang, D. Allan, A. Cluller and J. Cohen, 2008. Auxin mediates patterning of cluster root development induced by phosphorus deficiency in Lupinus albus. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plant Biologists, June 22-25, 2008, Merida, Mexico -.
18: Shen, Y., Z. Jiang, X. Yao, Z. Zhang and H. Lin et al., 2012. Genome expression profile analysis of the immature maize embryo during dedifferentiation. PLoS One, Vol. 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032237
19: Smith, S.N., 1934. Response of inbred lines and crosses in maize to variations of nitrogen and phosphorus supplied as nutrients. J. Am. Soc. Agron., 25: 785-804.
20: Srivastava, L.M., 2002. Plant Growth and Development: Hormones and Environment. 1st Edn., Academic Press, San Diego, pp: 786-786.
21: Teale, W.D., I.A. Paponov and K. Palme, 2006. Auxin in action: Signalling, transport and the control of plant growth and development. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7: 847-859. CrossRef |
22: Wagner, V.H. and G. Michael, 1971. The influence of varied nitrogen supply on the production of cytokinins in the roots of sunflower plants. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen., 162: 147-158.
23: Wang, Q.R. and J.Y. Li, 1998. Dynamics and prospect on studies of high acquisition of soil unavailable phosphorus by plants. Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci., 4: 107-116.
24: Wang, Y.P., P.A. Jiang, B.L.Chen, H.T. Jia and R.R. Lei, 2008. The dynamic change of cotton hormone under phosphorus stress. Xinjiang Agric. Sci., 45: 522-525.
25: Xiong, L. and J.K. Zhu, 2003. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol., 133: 29-36. PubMed |
26: Yamamoto, Y., N. Kamiya, Y. Morinaka, M. Matsuoka and T. Sazuka, 2007. Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA genes in rice. Plant Physiol., 143: 1362-1371. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
27: Zhu, J.K., 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 53: 247-273. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |