Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Review Article
 

Duck Meat Utilization and the Application of Surimi-like Material in Further Processed Meat Products



Kurnia Ramadhan, Nurul Huda and Ruzita Ahmad
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Poultry production has risen rapidly due to the increased consumption of further processed chicken-based products such as sausages, nuggets and burgers. This increase in poultry consumption has been dominated by chicken meat. Duck meat is also widely available but less frequently utilized in further processed products due to certain limitations of its functional properties. Nonetheless, duck meat production has increased steadily over the years. One technology that may improve the functional properties of meat is surimi processing. This specialized washing process removes undesired components (e.g., fats, blood, enzymes and pigments) and increases the concentration of myofibrillar proteins that play important roles in the functional properties of meat. The successful development of fish surimi has inspired researchers to study surimi-like material made from other animal muscle. Several researchers have tested the properties of surimi-like material made from beef, pork, chicken, mutton and sheep and reported improved qualities compared with the original (untreated) raw meats. Surimi-like material also has been used in several product formulations for nuggets, frankfurters, sausages, restructured roasts and imitation crab sticks. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that processing duck meat into surimi-like material could improve the functional properties of duck meat and allow its application in many further processed products.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Kurnia Ramadhan, Nurul Huda and Ruzita Ahmad, 2010. Duck Meat Utilization and the Application of Surimi-like Material in Further Processed Meat Products. Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 405-410.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2010.405.410

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2010.405.410
 
Received: April 16, 2010; Accepted: May 21, 2010; Published: July 14, 2010



INTRODUCTION

Poultry meat is very popular around the world in both developed and developing countries and its production has increased continuously in recent years. The popularity of poultry meat is due to its relatively low cost of production, rapid growth rate, high nutritional value and ability to be processed into various products, as well as the lack of cultural or religious prohibitions against its consumption (Barbut, 2002; Bilgili, 2001). Currently, the term poultry is most often used to refer to chicken. The prevalence of chicken consumption is closely related to the successful marketing of various further processed ready-to-eat chicken-based products. These products include those that were initially developed for red meat, such as sausages and burgers, as well as more recently developed types, such as nuggets. Moreover, a large number of consumers have changed their preference from red meat-based products to poultry-based products.

The production of duck meat, which is also categorized as poultry meat, has risen steadily in recent years and has become the third most widely produced poultry meat in the world after chicken and turkey. Furthermore, there has been an increase in demand for duck meat because it is no longer considered a seasonal dish and has become acceptable to eat at any time of year. This has been promoted by modern husbandry techniques that are able to supply greater quantities of duck meat (Dunn, 2008; Hird et al., 2005). Various breeds of duck are available. Some breeds are raised specifically for their meat, while others are kept for their egg-laying abilities (Sonaiya and Swan, 2004; Abraham and Ravindran, 2009). Nevertheless, spent egg-laying ducks can also be considered as a source of duck meat (Bhattacharyya et al., 2007). The availability of duck meat presents an opportunity to expand its use into many further processed meat products.

AVAILABILITY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF DUCK MEAT

The production of duck meat has been dominated by Asian countries, which supply more than 80% of the duck meat produced in the entire world. The People’s Republic of China has been the top producer and exporter of both live ducks and duck meat over many years.

Image for - Duck Meat Utilization and the Application of Surimi-like Material in Further Processed Meat Products
Fig. 1: World’s duck meat production and live duck stocks during 1987-2008 (FAO, 2009)

Table 1: Nutritional composition of raw duck, chicken and turkey meat per 100 g (USDA, 1999)
Image for - Duck Meat Utilization and the Application of Surimi-like Material in Further Processed Meat Products
SF: Saturated fat, MUF: Mono unsaturated fat, PUF: Poly unsaturated fat

Although France is the second-largest producer of duck meat, several Asian countries are close behind: Malaysia the third-largest, Thailand and Vietnam produce approximately as much duck meat as the United States of America. The production of live ducks has also been dominated by Asian countries. The five countries with the largest live duck stocks are China, Vietnam, Indonesia, India and Bangladesh (FAO, 2009).

Figure 1 shows the increase in world duck meat production and live duck stocks over time. The figure illustrates the threefold increase that occurred between 1987 and 2008 to achieve a total duck meat production of 3.7 million tons per year. The number of live duck stocks dropped in 1998 after reaching a peak at 1997, but have continued to increase since that time.

Duck meat has a unique combination of red meat and poultry meat characteristics. Like red meat, duck meat has relatively high fat content and levels of intramuscular phospholipids, which play a substantive role in the development of meat flavor. High levels of iron and heme pigment also make duck meat appear darker than most other poultry. Table 1 shows that duck meat with skin has distinctively higher fat and iron content compared with chicken and turkey meat. However, like chicken and turkey, duck meat is rich in unsaturated fatty acids and is thus beneficial for human health (Barbut, 2002; Baeza, 2006; Chartrin et al., 2006; USDA (1999).

The nutritional composition of duck meat varies depending on the breed and strain of duck. For example, Pekin duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) meat contains more fat than Muscovy duck (Cairina moschata). Duck meat is also more easily influenced by the animal’s diet than is chicken meat. The fatty acid content of duck meat is dominated by oleic acid (C18:1), a monounsaturated fatty acid; palmitic acid (C16), a saturated fatty acid; and linoleic acid (C18:2), a polyunsaturated fatty acid. Some researchers have reported that duck feeds may be modified to yield duck meat that contains more unsaturated fatty acid and less saturated fatty acid. Although this improves its value for human health, the high concentration of unsaturated fatty acids makes duck meat very susceptible to lipid oxidation (El-Deek et al., 1997; Russell et al., 2003; Solomon et al., 2006; Woloszyn et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2009).

FURTHER PROCESSED POULTRY MEAT PRODUCTS

The increase in consumption of poultry meat was accompanied by an increase in the number of further processed products offered by industries and the growing presence of fast-food services. These trends have gradually changed the pattern of poultry meat consumption. Initially, poultry was mainly marketed and sold as whole birds, but this has been replaced by various forms of further processed ready-to-eat products. For example, in the United States, further processed products made up about 46% of the poultry meat market in 2007, compared with less than 20% in 1985; whole birds account for only 11% of the poultry meat purchased by the end consumer (National Chicken Council, 2009).

Further processing of poultry is defined as the transformation of raw carcasses into value-added, easy to prepare and convenient products. The abundant and popular ready-to-eat products that can be easily found in grocery and retail stores are classified into following categories (Baker and Bruce, 1989; Keeton, 2001; Owens, 2001; Barbut, 2002; Huda et al., 2010; Silva and Gloria, 2002).

Formed (restructured) products, which may be produced by combining cut muscles with a ground or emulsified myofibrillar protein binder and a chilled brine and converted into frozen form. These products include burgers and patties.

Emulsified (comminuted) products composed of water, protein and salt; some products also contain added fat or starch. These substances are mixed in order to reduce particle size and to obtain a homogeneous mass of meat batter. This category includes sausages (frankfurters and bologna) and meatballs.

Coated (breaded) products, which account for a large portion of the growth in further processed poultry products over previous decades. The production of these nuggets involves particle size reduction, blending, forming, coating and cooking.

The quality of the raw material plays a significant role in the quality of the final products. Sensory and functional properties are of particular importance for the final quality of further processed products. Sensory properties include color, flavor, texture, oxidation stability and losses. Functional properties include emulsification capacity, meat-binding properties, water-binding properties, adhesion (for breaded products), meat yield, cooking losses and moisture, fat and protein contents (Barbut, 2002; Erdtsieck, 1989; Petracci and Baeza, 2009).

Bhattacharyya et al. (2007) conducted a study to compare sausages made from chicken meat and duck meat. Duck sausages had lower emulsion stability and cooking yield compared with chicken sausage as a result of their high fat content and lower water-retention capacity. As reported by Biswas et al. (2006), patties made from duck meat also had lower emulsion stability and cooking yield compared with chicken patties. Other researchers reported duck meat had higher cooking loss percentage, less lightness and more redness in color properties compared with chicken meat (Alvarado and Sams, 2000; Ali et al., 2007; Huda et al., 2008). These indicate that further research may improve the quality of further processed products made with duck meat.

FISH SURIMI

The term surimi was originally used in Japan to refer to a water-washed muscle protein extract produced from fish, usually mechanically recovered fish slurry. The washing process removes fats, water-soluble sarcoplasmic proteins (including enzymes and pigments), blood and metal ions and increases the concentration of salt-soluble myofibrillar proteins that have useful functional properties with respect to product texture (Sultanbawa and Li-Chan, 1998; Yang and Froning, 1992).

One important quality of surimi is its ability to form a gel. Gel breaking force, deformation and gel strength are all influenced by the proportion of myofibrillar proteins; generally, an increase in protein concentration will increase gel forming ability. However, the presence of undesirable components remains after the washing process cause unintended effects on surimi quality, e.g., inhomogeneity and granularity. In addition to improving gel-forming ability, the washing process is required to produce brighter, whiter surimi. This obviates the need for extra coloring agents during the production process, thus reducing costs. In the past, surimi was made only from underutilized fishes to enhance their value. Surimi can be widely utilized as a raw material in the production of various further processed meat products, such as kamaboko (traditional Japanese fish gel), seafood analogues, fish balls, fish ham and fish sausages (Babji et al., 1995; Boran and Köse, 2007; Larkin and Sylvia, 1999; Mizuta et al., 2007; Sultanbawa and Li-Chan, 1998; Yang and Froning, 1992). Currently, most of fish balls and fish crackers manufacturer in Malaysia are using surimi as raw material for their products (Huda and Ismail, 2009; Huda and Ariffin, 2010).

Surimi can be kept in frozen form for months. In order to prevent protein denaturation during freezing and frozen storage, some cryoprotectants are usually added to surimi. Many studies have reported the use of various cryoprotectants, such as sucrose-sorbitol, polydextrose, trehalose, lactilol and other polyols (sugar alcohol). Commercial surimi preparations use a sucrose-sorbitol combination mixed with sodium tripolyphosphate (Herrera and Mackie, 2004; Zhou et al., 2006). Cryoprotectants is not only able to prevent protein denaturation during freezing and frozen storage, but also during drying process (Huda et al., 2000). Surimi powder produced also showing higher protein quality (Huda et al., 2001).

Table 2: Previous studies about surimi-like material and its quality improvement
Image for - Duck Meat Utilization and the Application of Surimi-like Material in Further Processed Meat Products
NA: Not available

PREVIOUS SURIMI-LIKE MATERIAL STUDIES

Based on the very successful application of surimi in fish industries, there have been considerable efforts to use this technique with other animal muscle. These products have been called surimi-like material or washed meat. As fish surimi was made from underutilized fishes, surimi-like materials have generally been produced from low value or unpopular meat sources, such as spent hen and beef heart. However, many studies have investigated the functional properties of surimi-like material made from a number of meats, including beef, pork, mutton, sheep meat, broiler and mechanically deboned chicken meat (Antonomanolaki et al., 1999; Babji et al., 1995; Jin et al., 2007; McCormick et al., 1993; Nowsad et al., 2000a; Park et al., 1996; Parkington et al., 2000; Srinivasan and Xiong, 1996; Wang et al., 1997; Yang and Froning, 1992).

As shown in Table 2, previous studies of washed meat (surimi-like material) demonstrated lower fat content and improved lightness (color) and textural properties compared with raw (unwashed) meat. Surimi washing processes successfully removed more than 90% of the fat content in mutton. This is especially important as modern consumers prefer meat with less fat (Colmenero, 1996; Farhat, 2009). Furthermore, a nearly 30% improvement in textural properties has been achieved in spent hen, broiler and sheep surimi. The lightness value of sheep surimi was also drastically increased, by 63%.

Because surimi-like materials are prospective raw ingredients for many further processed products, several studies have focused on surimi shelf life and cryoprotection. In particular, a combined sucrose and sorbitol cryoprotectant has been able to maintain some of the quality attributes of chicken surimi during the freezing process and in frozen storage (Kijowski and Richardson, 1996; Nowsad et al., 2000b).

APPLICATIONS OF SURIMI-LIKE MATERIALS

The use of surimi-like material as substitute ingredient has been reported in previous publications. Perlo et al. (2006) reported that washed chicken meat may be used as a substitute ingredient in chicken nuggets for up to 40% of the meat in the formulation. Another study showed that spent hen surimi can replace around 40-60% of the meat in sausage formulations (Jin et al., 2007).

Although surimi-like material can be used in large proportions in product formulations, some research has shown that optimum results can be reached with lower proportions of surimi. Desmond and Kenny (1998) found that the optimum frankfurter formulation contained 7-10% beef heart surimi. Similarly, McCormick et al. (1993) described good results when 5% of restructured roast meat formula was replaced with mutton surimi. Jin et al. (2009) reported optimal results for imitation crab sticks using 5.5-11% spent hen surimi as a substitute ingredient.

CONCLUSION

The increase in duck meat production and trends toward the greater consumption of further processed meat products present the opportunity to develop more products that use duck meat as a raw material. High-quality further processed meat, particularly emulsified meat products, can only be made from meat with specific functional properties. The processing of duck meat into a surimi-like material is one promising strategy to improve its functional properties and allow its incorporation into many kinds of further processed meat products.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors acknowledge with gratitude the support given by Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). This research was carried out with aid of a research grant from Malayan Sugar Manufacturing Company berhad through grant 304/PTEKIND/650462/K132.

REFERENCES

1:  Abraham, J. and R. Ravindran, 2009. Studies on the Aroor system of sustainable duck rearing in Kerala, India. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 8: 804-807.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Ali, M.S., G.H. Kang, H.S. Yang, J.Y. Jeong, Y.H. Hwang, G.B. Park and S.T. Joo, 2007. A comparison of meat characteristics between duck and chicken breast. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 20: 1002-1006.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Alvarado, C.Z. and A.R. Sams, 2000. The influence of postmortem electrical stimulation on rigor mortis development, calpastatin activity and tenderness in broiler and duck pectoralis. Poult. Sci., 79: 1364-1368.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Antonomanolaki, R.E., K.P. Vareltzis, S.A. Georgakis and E. Kaldrymidou, 1999. Thermal gelation properties of surimi-like material made from sheep meat. Meat Sci., 52: 429-435.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Babji, A.S., I. Mukhlis, S.K. Gna, M.Y.S. Chempaka, M. Norhaliza and B. Eraou, 1995. Processing efficiency and physico-chemical properties of surimi type materials. Malaysian J. Anim. Sci., 1: 52-58.

6:  Baker, R.C. and C.A. Bruce, 1989. Further Processing Poultry. In: Processing of Poultry, Mead, G.C. (Ed.). Elsevier Applied Science, New York, ISBN: 1851663053, pp: 251-283

7:  Barbut, S., 2002. Poultry Products Processing: An Industry Guide. CRC Press, Florida, FL., ISBN: 1587160609

8:  Baeza, E., 2006. Major trends in research into domestic ducks and recent results concerning meat quality. Proceeding of the 12th European Poultry Conference, Sept. 10-14, Verona, Italy.

9:  Bilgili, S.F., 2001. Poultry products and processing in the international market place. Proceedings of the International Animal Agriculture and Food Science Conference, Indianapolis, United States of America.

10:  Biswas, S., A. Chakraborty and S. Sarkar, 2006. Comparison among the qualitites of patties prepared from chicken broiler, spent hen and duck meats. J. Poult. Sci., 43: 180-186.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Boran, M. and S. Kose, 2007. Storage properties of three types of fried whiting balls at refrigerated temperatures. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 7: 65-70.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Chartrin, P., K. Meteau, H. Juin, M.D. Bernadet and G. Guy et al., 2006. Effects of intramuscular fat levels on sensory characteristics of duck breast meat. Poult. Sci., 85: 914-922.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Jimenez-Colmenero, F., 1996. Technologies for developing low-fat meat products. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 7: 41-48.
CrossRef  |  

14:  Desmond, E.M. and T.A. Kenny, 1998. Preparation of surimi-like extract from beef hearts and its utilisation in frankfurters. Meat Sci., 50: 81-89.
CrossRef  |  

15:  Dunn, N., 2008. Wiesenhof's single-source secret to success. http://www.poultryinternational-digital.com/poultryinternational/200810/?pg=14.

16:  El-Deek, A.A., M.O. Barakat, M.A. Attia and A.S. El-Sebeay, 1997. Effect of feeding Muscovy ducklings different protein sources: Performance, ω-3 fatty acid contents and acceptability of their tissues. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 74: 999-1009.
Direct Link  |  

17:  Erdtsieck, B., 1989. Quality Requirements in the Modern Poultry Industry. In: Processing of Poultry, Mead, G.C. (Ed.). Elsevier Applied Science, New York, ISBN: 1851663053, pp: 1-30

18:  FAO, 2009. FAO Stat Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

19:  Farhat, A., 2009. Carcass characteristics of pekin ducks selected for greater breast muscle thickness using ultrasound scanning in response to dietary protein. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 731-739.
Direct Link  |  

20:  Hird, H., J. Chisholm and J. Brown, 2005. The detection of commercial duck species in food using a single probe-multiple species-specific primer real-time PCR assay. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 221: 559-563.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

21:  Herrera, J.R. and I.M. Mackie, 2004. Cryoprotection of frozen-stored actomyosin of farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by some sugars and polyols. Food Chem., 84: 91-97.
CrossRef  |  

22:  Herrera, J.R. and I.M. Mackie, 2004. Cryoprotection of frozen-stored actomyosin of farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by some sugars and polyols. Food Chem., 84: 91-97.
CrossRef  |  

23:  Huda, N., A. Abdullah and A.S. Babji, 2000. Nutritional quality of surimi powder from Threadfin bream. J. Muscle Foods, 11: 99-109.
CrossRef  |  

24:  Huda, N., A. Abdullah and A.S. Babji, 2001. Functional properties of surimi powder from three Malaysian marine fish. Int. J. Food Sci Technol., 36: 401-406.
CrossRef  |  

25:  Huda, N. and N. Ismail, 2009. Malaysian fishball production-then and now. INFOFISH Int., 2: 35-39.

26:  Huda, N. and F. Ariffin, 2010. Production and properties of Malaysian fish crackers. INFOFISH Int., 2: 32-36.

27:  Huda, N., Y.H. Shen, Y.L. Huey, R. Ahmad and A. Mardiah, 2010. Evaluation of physico-chemical properties of Malaysian commercial beef meatballs. Am. J. Food Technol., 5: 13-21.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

28:  Jin, S.K., I.S. Kim, H.J. Jung, D.H. Kim, Y.J. Choi and S.J. Hur, 2007. The development of sausage including meat from spent laying hen surimi. Poult. Sci., 86: 2676-2684.
Direct Link  |  

29:  Jin, S.K., I.S. Kim, Y.J. Choi, B.G. Kim and S.J. Hur, 2009. The development of imitation crab stick containing chicken breast surimi. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 42: 150-156.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

30:  Keeton, J.T., 2001. Formed and Emulsion Products. In: Poultry Meat Processing, Sams, A.R. (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN: 0849301203, pp: 195-226

31:  Kijowski, J. and R.I. Richardson, 1996. The effect of cryoprotectants during freezing or freeze drying upon properties of washed mechanically recovered broiler meat. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 31: 45-54.
CrossRef  |  

32:  Larkin, S. and G. Sylvia, 1999. Firm-level hedonic analysis of US produced surimi: Implications for processors and resource managers. Mar. Resour. Econ., 14: 179-198.
Direct Link  |  

33:  McCormick, R.J., S. Bugren, R.A. Field, D.C. Rule and J.R. Busboom, 1993. Surimi-like products from mutton. J. Food Sci., 58: 497-500.
Direct Link  |  

34:  Mizuta, S., K. Nakashima and R. Yoshinaka, 2007. Behaviour of connective tissue in fish surimi on fractination by sieving. Food Chem., 100: 477-481.
CrossRef  |  

35:  National Chicken Council, 2009. Statistic and Research: How Broilers are Marketed? NCC, Washington, DC., USA

36:  Nowsad, A.A.K.M., S. Kanoh and E. Niwa, 2000. Thermal gelation characteristics of breast and thigh muscles of spent hen and broiler and their surimi. Meat Sci., 54: 169-175.
CrossRef  |  

37:  Nowsad, A.A., W.F. Huang, S. Kanoh and E. Niwa, 2000. Washing and cryoprotectant effects on frozen storage of spent hen surimi. Poult. Sci., 79: 913-920.
Direct Link  |  

38:  Owens, C.M., 2001. Coated Poultry Products. In: Poultry Meat Processing, Sams, A.R. (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN: 0849301203, pp: 227-242

39:  Park, S., M.S. Brewer, F.K. McKeith, P.J. Betchel and J. Novakofski, 1996. Salt, cryoprotectants and preheating temperature effects on surimi-like material from beef or pork. J. Food Sci., 61: 790-795.
CrossRef  |  

40:  Parkington, J.K., Y.L. Xiong, S.P. Blanchard, S. Xiong, B. Wang and S. Srinivasan, 2000. Chemical and functional properties of oxidatively modified beef heart surimi stored at 2oC. J. Food Sci., 65: 428-433.
Direct Link  |  

41:  Perlo, F., P. Bonato, G. Teira, R. Fabre and S. Kueider, 2006. Physicochemical and sensory properties of chicken nuggets with washed mechanically deboned chicken meat: Research note. Meat Sci., 72: 785-788.
CrossRef  |  

42:  Petracci, M. and E. Baeza, 2009. Harmonization of Methodology of Assessment of Poultry Meat Quality Features. World's Poultry Science Association, UK., pp: 1-18

43:  Russell, E.A., A. Lynch, K. Galvin, P.B. Lynch and J.P. Kerry, 2003. Quality of raw, frozen and cooked duck meat as affected by dietary fat and α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 324-334.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

44:  Silva, C.M.G. and M.B.A. Gloria, 2002. Bioactive amines in chicken breast and thigh after slaughter and during storage at 4±1°C and in chicken-based meat products. Food Chem., 78: 241-248.
Direct Link  |  

45:  Solomon, J.K.Q., R. Austin, R.N. Cumberbatch, J. Gonsalves and E. Seaforth, 2006. A comparison of live weight and carcass gain of Pekin, Kunshan and Muscovy ducks on a commercial ration. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 18, No. 11.
Direct Link  |  

46:  Sonaiya, E.B. and S.E.J. Swan, 2004. FAO Animal Production and Health: Small Scale Poultry Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Itly, ISBN: 92-5-105082-1

47:  Srinivasan, S. and Y.L. Xiong, 1996. Gelation of beef heart surimi as affected by antioxidants. J. Food Sci., 61: 707-711.
CrossRef  |  

48:  Sultanbawa, Y. and E.C.Y. Li-Chan, 1998. Cryoprotective effects of sugars and polyols blends in ling cod surimi during frozen storage. Food Res. Int., 31: 87-98.
Direct Link  |  

49:  USDA, 1999. Nutrient Database for Standards Reference. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

50:  Wang, B., Y. Xiong and S. Srinivasan, 1997. Chemical stability of antioxidant-washed beef heart surimi during frozen storage. J. Food Sci., 62: 939-991.
CrossRef  |  

51:  Wang, D., W. Xu, X. Xu, G. Zhou, Y. Zhu, C. Li and M. Yang, 2009. Determination of intramuscular phospholipid classes and molecular species in Gaoyou duck. Food Chem., 112: 150-155.
CrossRef  |  

52:  Woloszyn, J., J. Ksiazkiewicz, T. Skrabka-Blotnicka, G. Haraf, J. Biernat and T. Kisiel, 2006. Comparison of amino acid and fatty acid composition of duck breast muscles from five flocks. Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf, 49: 194-204.
Direct Link  |  

53:  Yang, T.S. and G.W. Froning, 1992. Selected washing processes affect thermal gelation properties and microstructure of mechanically deboned chicken meat. J. Food Sci., 57: 325-329.
CrossRef  |  

54:  Huda, N., R. Ahmad, N.H.M. Aripin and A.A. Putra, 2008. Proximate and physicochemical characteristics of meat ball produced by different ratio of duck and chicken meat. Proceedings of the PATPI 2008 Conference, Oct. 14-16, Palembang, Indonesia.

55:  Zhou, A., S. Benjakul, K. Pan, J. Gong and X. Liu, 2006. Cryoprotective effects of trehalose and sodium lactate on tilapia (Sarotherodon nilotica) surimi during frozen storage. J. Food Chem., 96: 96-103.
CrossRef  |  

56:  Bhattacharyya, D., M. Sinhamahapatra and S. Biswas, 2007. Preparation of sausage from spent duck: An acceptability study. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 42: 24-29.
CrossRef  |  

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved