Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan



Azmi D. Hawari and Dhia S. Hassawi
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to establish data on mastitis in she-camels in Jordan. Milk samples were collected from 90 dromedary camels in south province of Jordan. California Mastitis Test (CMT) gave results with 70 milk samples; 42 samples (60%) showed positive CMT. Infection with some bacterial species was associated with positive CMT. About 21% of the camels revealed clinical signs of mastitis. The highest percentage of bacterial count, which range from 3.0x102 to <3.0x103 cfu mL-1, was founded in the milk samples. The most predominant bacterial isolates were Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp. Gentamycin, Ampicillin and Tetracycline were the most effective antimicrobial agents against the bacterial isolates.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Azmi D. Hawari and Dhia S. Hassawi, 2008. Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan. Journal of Biological Sciences, 8: 958-961.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2008.958.961

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2008.958.961
 

INTRODUCTION

Mastitis has both an extreme zoonotic and economic importance. It is the cause of multiple hazardous effects on human health and animal production (Makovec and Ruegg, 2003; Hegazi et al., 2004; Al-Majali et al., 2008). Camel milk is one of the main components of diet of the nomads in semiarid and arid zones and is an essential food for livelihood of people and it maybe the only milk available in places where other milking animals cannot be maintained (Kazmi, 2002; Abdurahman, 2006). Little work has been done on mastitis in camels comparing to studies on sheep and cows. Three decades ago, there was no mention of mastitis problem at herd level; today it is reported from almost all camel rearing countries (Al-Ani and Al-Shareefi, 1998; Guliye et al., 2002; Khedid et al., 2003; Mohammed et al., 2005).

Many different bacteria has been isolated from mastitic mammary glands in camels either in the form of pure or mixed infection (Barbour et al., 1985; Abdurahman, 1996; Bekele and Molla, 2001; Younan et al., 2001; Woubit et al., 2001; Hegazy et al., 2004; Abdurahman, 2006; Abdel Gadir et al., 2006). In Jordan, information on mastitis in one humped she-camel (Camelus dromedarius) is almost non-existed and has recently received more veterinary attention as a disease of camels.

This study was undertaken to establish data on mastitis in single-humped subtropical camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan, to determine if a relationship exists between California Mastitis Test (CMT) results and bacterial counts and to study the susceptibility of these bacteria to different antimicrobial agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted during the years 2006 and 2007. Milk samples were collected from 90 lactating she-camels that selected randomly from five herds in the south province of Jordan. All udders were subjected to clinical examinations such as swelling and presence of lesions or anatomical malformations. Prior to sampling, the udder was washed, dried and the teat was disinfected. After discarding the first 15 mL of foremilk, about 15 mL were collected in sterile universal bottles and transported immediately to the laboratory in ice boxes for analysis.

The milk samples were examined for their consistency, color and other visible abnormalities. Clinical mastitis was recognized by abnormal milk, signs of udder infection and detection of mastitis pathogens by bacteriological culture; whereas subclinical mastitis was recognized by apparently normal milk and an increase in somatic cells as evidence by CMT and positive culture results. CMT was used to give an indication of the number of somatic cells present in each of the milk samples.

To determine the total bacterial count, a volume of 0.1 mL of each milk sample was spread using a sterile L-shaped glass rod on Plate Count Agar (Oxoid); plates were incubated at 37°C for a period of 18-24 h and then counted. Direct streaking was done on duplicate 7% sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar plates; plates were incubated aerobically and anaerobically using Gas Pak System at 37°C and examine after 24 and 48 h. Bacteriological examinations were carried out. MacConkey agar plates were used to detect Enterococcus spp. and any Gram-negative bacteria. The Gram-negative bacteria were identified by biochemical reactions. Bacterial isolates present at 3.0x102 cfu mL-1 or greater were identified to the genus level and in certain cases to the species level using standard procedures (Finegold and Scott, 1978).

Muller-Hinton Agar (oxoid) was used for disk diffusion method to test the susceptibility of the isolates to some antibiotics: 10 μg Gentamycin, 10 μg Ampicillin, 10 μg Streptomycin, 30 μg Tetracycline and 10 IU Penicillin. For fastidious organisms the Muller-Hinton Agar was supplemented with 7% sheep blood. The recorded data for the Sensitivity test to antibiotics were subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA); the Least Significant Differences (LSD) at probability <0.05 was used to asses the differences among means.

RESULTS

Seventy milk samples out of 90 collected from individual camels were scored by the CMT technique. Camels with obvious signs of inflamed udders had a mean lactation of about four months. Some (21%) of the camels had clinical signs of mastitis. The visible signs of inflammation included acute and edematous swelling of the udder and formation of pus in the mammary exudates resulting in a visible alteration of the milk.

Table 1 shows differences between percentages of CMT negative and positive samples. The negative samples distributed in three different bacterial count ranges namely <3.0x102, 3.0x102 to <3.0x103 and >3.0x103 cfu mL-1; the highest percentage of CMT negative milk samples (69.45) was found in the total bacterial count range of <3.0x102 cfu mL-1. For CMT positive samples, the highest percentage (54.08) was found in the range of 3.0x102 to <3.0x103 cfu mL-1.

Table 2 shows the relationship between specific organisms, which mostly are the causative agent of mastitis and the respective percentage of samples with negative and positive CMT. The bacteria (Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp.) show highest percentages for positive CMT; while the bacteria (Corynebacterium pyogenes, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) show only positive CMT; whereas the bacteria (E. coli, Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida) show only negative CMT.

Table 3 shows that the total bacterial count range for different bacteria infecting the camel`s udder was most commonly 3.0x102 to 3.0x103 rather than >3.0x103 cfu mL-1. This same table indicates that the most frequent bacterial flora from different camels was: Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium spp. Six other aerobic bacteria were isolated. Bacteroid spp. was the only anaerobic bacterium isolated. Candida albicans was isolated from one sample.

Table 4 shows the result of sensitivity tests of the organisms isolated to antibiotics. The in vitro susceptibility testing of 61 bacterial isolates showed that the most effective drugs were Gentamycin and Ampicillin. The less effective drugs were Streptomycin and Penicillin.

Table 1: The relationship between positive and negative CMT scores and the percentages of camel milk samples of different bacterial counts
Image for - Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan

Table 2: Bacterial identified and percentage of camel milk samples with different CMT scores
Image for - Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan

Table 3: The percentages of camel milk samples that included in two different bacterial counts of various organisms
Image for - Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan
*Counts of <3.0x102 were not considered as such bacteria were not identified

Table 4: Sensitivity test for bacterial isolates against different antibiotics using disc diffusion method
Image for - Mastitis in One Humped She-Camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Jordan
GM = Gentamicin (10 μg), AM = Ampicillin (10 μg), TE = Tetracycline (30 μg), S = Streptomycin (10 μg), P = Penicillin (10 IU). *Percentages means among columns which are followed by different letter(s) differ significantly (p<0.05)

DISCUSSION

The relation among CMT, the presence of inflamed udders and the bacteriological findings indicated that camel milk is like that of cows (Djabri et al., 2002); it also indicated that camels have phagocytic cells, which constitute one of the essential defenses against microbial infection of the mammary glands.

CMT can be used to detect subclinically infected udders of camels (Barbour et al., 1985; Sargeant et al., 2001). Table 1 and 2 indicated that bacterial infection was involved in mastitis of Camelus dromedarius. Table 1 shows that higher bacterial counts were present in positive CMT samples than in the negative ones. The relation of CMT with the presence of mastitis pathogens in camel milk showed that CMT is a useful screening test in the detection of mastitis in camels and may serve to segregate udders infected with major pathogens in a subclinical form. An increase in the number of somatic cells in camel milk is a good indication of inflammation.

Table 2 indicated that the majority of camels react to infecting bacteria by raising the somatic cells in milk. Woubit et al. (2001) and Abdurahman et al. (1995) found that the results of the somatic cell counts of the milk samples were between 3x105 to 1.5x107 of cells mL-1.

Table 3 shows that in many cases of infection with a variety of bacteria, the organisms are present at less than 3.0x103 mL-1 and a minority exceed this level which is similar to that reported by Barbour et al. (1985). This may indicate that there is a limit to bacterial multiplication in the camel`s udder probably due to the complex immune system. The relative number of the various pathogens (Table 3) especially S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. is very similar to that reported by Woubit et al. (2001) and Abdurahman (2006). S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. along with Micrococcus spp. seem to be the major causative agents of mastitis in camels and this is in agreements with that of Barbour et al. (1985) and Woubit et al. (2001).

The in vitro susceptibility test of the bacterial isolates indicated that Gentamycin, Ampicillin and Tetracycline were the most effective drugs. The bacterial flora showed greatest resistance to penicillin and streptomycin; these two drugs are the most commonly used for domestic animals in Jordan and this may lead to an accumulation of resistant bacteria to these drugs. The percentage average of resistance of Gram-positive cocci to penicillin was 63.587% as shown in Table 4.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicated that mastitis was prevalent in dromedary camels in Jordan and the Gram-positive cocci were the dominant mastitis pathogens. More efforts are needed to improve the general udder health. It is possible to recommend a control program for camel mastitis in Jordan taking in consideration using effective antibiotics therapy during lactation and at drying off; this would be essential part of such a program.

REFERENCES

1:  Abdel Gadir Atif E., G. Hildebrandt, J.N. Kleer, B. Molla, M.N. Kyule and M.P. Baumann, 2006. Comparison of California Mastitis Test (CMT), Somatic cell counts (SCC) and bacteriological examinations for detection of camel (Camelus dromedarus) mastitis in Ethiopia. Berl. Munch. Tieraztl Wochenschr., 119: 45-49.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Abdurahman, O.A.S., 1996. The detection of subclinical mastitis in the bacterian camel (Camelus bactrians) using somatic cell count and California mastitis test. Vet. Res. Commun., 20: 9-14.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Abdurahman, O.S.H., H. Agab, B. Abbas and G. Astroem, 1995. Relations between udder infection and somatic cells in camel (Camelus dromedarius) milk. Acta Vet. Scand., 36: 423-431.
PubMed  |  

4:  Abdurahman, O.A.S., 2006. Udder health and milk quality among camels in the Errer valley of eastern Ethiopia. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 18 No. 8, 2006
Direct Link  |  

5:  Al-Ani, F.K. and M.R. Al-Shareefi, 1998. Studies on mastitis in lactating one humped camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Iraq. J. Camel Pract. Res., 41: 47-49.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Al-Majali, A.M., K.M. Al-Qudah, Y.H. Al-Tarazi and O.F. Al-Rawashdeh, 2008. Risk factors associated with camel brucellosis in Jordan. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 40: 193-200.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Almaw, G. and B. Molla, 2000. Prevalence and etiology of mastitis in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in eastern Ethiopia. J. Camel Pract. Res., 7: 97-100.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Barbour, E.K., N.H. Nabbut, W.M. Frerichs, H.M. Al Nakhli and A.A. Mukayel, 1985. Mastitis in Camelus dromedarius in Saudi Arabia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 17: 173-179.
PubMed  |  

9:  Bekele, T. and B. Molla, 2001. Mastitis in lactating camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Afar region, North-eastern Ethiopia. Berl. Munch. Tierarzl. Wochenschr., 114: 169-172.
PubMed  |  

10:  Djabri, B., N. Bareille, F. Beaudeau and H. Seegers, 2002. Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Vet. Res., 33: 335-357.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Finegold, S.M., W.J. Martin, and E.G. Scott, 1978. Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th Edn. C.V. Mosby Company, St Louis, Missouri. ISBN-13: 978-1-4160-2581-8

12:  Guliye, A.Y., C. van Creveld and R. Yagil, 2002. Detection of subclinical mastitis in dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) using somatic cell counts and the N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase test. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 34: 95-104.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Hegazy, A.A., A. El Dughaym, M. Alaknah, F.M.T. Housawi and M.E. Hatem, 2004. Studies on mastitis in female camel with special reference to brucellosis. J. Camel Sci., 1: 96-102.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Kazmi, A., 2002. Camel's milk more nutritious than cow's. Gulf News,
Direct Link  |  

15:  Khedid, T., M. Faid and M. Soulaimani, 2003. Microbiological characterization of one humped camel milk in Morocco. J. Camel Pract. Res., 10: 169-172.

16:  Makovec, J.A. and P.L. Ruegg, 2003. Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3466-3472.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Mohammed, A., M. Ruiz-Bascaran and B. Abera, 2005. Cross-sectional study of mastitis in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Somal region, Southeastern Ethiopia Bull. Anim. Health Prod. Africa, 53: 195-207.
Direct Link  |  

18:  Sargeant, J.M., K.E. Leslie, J.E. Shirley, B.J. Pulkrabek and G.H. Lim, 2001. Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California mastitis test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2018-2024.
PubMed  |  

19:  Younan, M., Z. Ali, S. Bornstein, and W. Mueller, 2001. Application of the California mastitis test in intramammary Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus infections of camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Kenya. Prev. Vet. Med., 51: 307-316.
CrossRef  |  

20:  Woubit, S., M. Bayleyegn, P. Bonnet and S. Jean-Baptiste, 2001. Camel (Camelus dromedarius) mastitis in Borena lowland pastoral Area, Southwestern Ethiopia. Revue Elev. Med. Vet. Pay Trop., 54: 207-212.
Direct Link  |  

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved