• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Biological Sciences
  2. Vol 6 (6), 2006
  3. 1146-1149
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 1146-1149
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2006.1146.1149
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

N. Sadeghifard, M.M. Aslani and A. Ghasemi

ABSTRACT


The aim of the present study was to compare four laboratory methods for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 101 sets of four antral biopsies were collected from 101 patients, one of the biopsies in each set were tested by rapid urease test, other three biopsies were used for culture, direct staining and histopathology, respectively. By culture method in 62 cases (61.3%), Helicobacter pylori were isolated. Among several primary media that tested in this study, Brucella agar supplemented with 10% whole sheep blood supported relatively good growth of H. pylori. In present study 65 cases (64.3%) were positive by rapid urease test. Of 101 biopsy specimens in 68 cases (67.3%) were obtained positive result by histopathology method (Gimsa Staining). Sensitivity and specificity of direct staining test were 89.7 and 96.9%, respectively. We found histopathology method was the best method for diagnosis of H. pylori and it can be selected as gold standard in detection of Helicobacter pylori.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

N. Sadeghifard, M.M. Aslani and A. Ghasemi, 2006. Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Biological Sciences, 6: 1146-1149.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2006.1146.1149

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2006.1146.1149

Search


REFERENCES


  1. Aguilar-Soto, O., C. Majalca-Martnez, F. Leon-Espinosa, G. Avila-Vargas and R. Sanchez-Medina et al., 2004. Comparative study between rapid urease test, imprint and histopathological study for Helicobacter pylori diagnosis. Rev. Gastroenterol. Mex., 29: 136-142.

  2. Albertson, N., I. Wenngren and J.E. Sjostro, 1998. Growth and Survival of Helicobacter pylori in Defined Medium and Susceptibility to Brij 78. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 1232-1235.

  3. Andrew, A., J.I. Wyatt and M.F. Dixon, 1994. Observer variation in the assessment of chronic gastritis according to the Sydney system. Histopathology, 25: 317-322.

  4. Baron, J.H. and R.P.H. Logan, 1994. Infection by Helicobacter pylori is the major cause of duodenal ulcer. Proc. R. Coll. Physicians, Edin., 24: 21-26.

  5. Blaser, M.J., 1992. Hypotheses on the pathogenesis and natural history of Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation. Gastroenterology, 102: 720-727.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  6. Buck, G.E. and J.S. Smith, 1987. Medium supplementation for growth of Campylobacter pyloridis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 25: 597-599.

  7. Correa, P., 1992. Human gastric carcinogenesis: A multistep and multifactorial process. Cancer. Res., 52: 6735-6740.
    PubMed

  8. Coudron, P. and D.F. Kirby, 1989. Comparison of rapid urease tests, staining techniques and growth on different solid media for detection of campylobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol., 27: 1527-1530.

  9. Jarczyk, G., J. Jarczyk, A. Raczynska and W. Jedrzejczyk, 1996. Urease test, microbiologic tests, histologic and serologic tests for the evaluation of Helicobacter pylori infections in persons with peptic ulcer and gastritis. Pol. Tyg. Lek. Apr., 51: 219-222.

  10. Jones, D.M., A.M. Lessels and J. Eldridge, 1984. Campylobacter like organisms in the gastric mucosa: Culture, histological and serological studies. J. Clin. Pathol., 37: 1002-1006.

  11. Logan, R.P.H. and M.M. Walker, 2001. Epidemiology and diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Br. Med. J., 323: 920-922.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  12. Marshall, B.J., J.R. Warren, G.J. Francis, S.R. Langton, C.S. Goodwin and E.D. Blincow, 1987. Rapid urease test in the management of Campylobacter pyloridis-associated gastritis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 82: 200-210.
    PubMed

  13. Marshall, B.J., J.R Warren and C.S. Goodwin, 1989. Duodenal ulcer relapse after eradication of Campylobacter pylori Lancet, 1: 846-846.

  14. Meining, A. and M. Stolte, 2002. Close correlation of intestinal metaplasia and corpus gastritis in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Z. Gastroenterol., 40: 557-560.

  15. Neale, K.R. and R.P.H. Logan, 1995. The epidemiology and transmission of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Aliment. Pharmacol., 9: 77-84.

  16. Taj, Y., F. Essa, S.U. Kazmi and E. Abdullah, 2003. Sensitivity and specificity of various diagnostic tests in the detection of Helicobacter pylori. J. Coll. Physicians. Surg. Pak., 13: 90-93.

  17. Tepes, B., V. Ferlan-Marolt, A.B. Jutersek, K. Kaucic and L. Zaletel-Kragelj, 1999. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of gastritis reversibility after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Histopathology, 34: 124-133.

  18. Thijs, J.C., A.A. van Zwet, W.J. Thijs, H.B. Oey and A. Karrenbeld et al., 1996. Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: A prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 91: 2125-2129.

  19. Thillainayagam, A.V., A.S. Arvind, R.S. Cook, T.G. Harrison, S. Tabagchali and M.J.G. Farthing, 1991. Diagnostic efficiency of an ultrarapid endoscopy room test for Helicobacter pylori. Gut, 32: 467-469.

  20. Westblom, T.U., E. Madan, J. Kemp and M.A. Subik, 1988. Evaluation of a rapid urease test to detect Campylohacte pylori infection. J. Clin. Microbiol., 26: 1393-1394.

  21. Whitaker, C.J. and A.J. Dubiel, 1993. Social and geographical risk factors in Helicobacter pylori infection. Epidemiol. Infect, 111: 63-63.

  22. Zaitoun, A.M., 1993. Histology compared with chemical testing for urease for rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens. Clin. Pathol., 46: 684-685.

Search


Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved