Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Breeding Behavior Effects for Yield, its Components and Fiber Quality Traits in Intraspecific Crosses of Cotton (G. hirsutum L.)



Muhammad Iqbal, 1Muhammad Ali Chang , Muhammad Zaffar Iqbal , Mahmood-ul-Hassan , Abdul Karim and Saghir Ahmad
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Six upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) varieties were crossed in all possible combinations. The parents and F1 were sown in a replicated experiment. Hayman’s diallel cross analysis was employed to investigate the nature of gene action involved in the inheritance of number of sympodial branches per plant, number of bolls per plant, boll weight, yield, ginning out turn %, staple length, fiber fineness and fiber strength. The diallel analysis revealed that all the characters were polygenically inherited and exhibited partial dominance with additive gene action. The estimation of component of variation for these characters suggested that the (D) additive component was significant in all the traits under study and was lower than dominant components (H1 and H2) of variation except for number of sympodial branches per plant, number of bolls per plant and seed cotton yield per plant, where the dominant components were higher in magnitude than additive. The positive estimate of F indicated that dominant genes were in excess than recessive genes in the parents for all the traits except for ginning out turn percentage and fiber fineness. The ratio of H2/4H1 indicated largely asymmetry of positive and negative genes in parents for number of bolls per plant, seed cotton yield, staple length, fiber fineness and fiber strength, and symmetrical distribution of positive and negative genes in the parents was observed for number of sympodial branches per plant, boll weight and ginning out turn percentage. The h2 value for number of number of sympodial branches per plant, number of bolls per plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield per plant, ginning out turn, staple length, fiber fineness, and fiber strength was positive and significant which indicated that hetrotic breeding was rewarding for these traits. The correlation between Wr + Vr and Yi indicated that dominant genes are mainly responsible for the expression of all traits. Mass selection will be an effective method for improving the boll weight and reciprocal recurrent selection method will be helpful for improving the sympodial branches per plant, number of bolls per plant, seed cotton yield, fiber fineness and fiber strength. The full sib or half sib family selection, pedigree and progeny test would probably be necessary to achieve the genetic progress for GOT% and staple length.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Muhammad Iqbal, 1Muhammad Ali Chang , Muhammad Zaffar Iqbal , Mahmood-ul-Hassan , Abdul Karim and Saghir Ahmad , 2003. Breeding Behavior Effects for Yield, its Components and Fiber Quality Traits in Intraspecific Crosses of Cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 451-459.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2003.451.459

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2003.451.459

REFERENCES

  1. Afzal, M., 1949. Growth and Development F Cotton Plant and its Improvement in the Punjab. Govt. Printing Press, Lahore


  2. Afzal, M. and M. Ali, 1983. Cotton Pant in Pakistan. 2nd Edn., Govt. Printing Press, Lahore, Pakistan.


  3. Green, C.C. and T.W. Culp, 1990. Simultaneous improvement of yield, fiber quality and yarn strength in upland cotton. Crop Sci., 30: 66-69.
    Direct Link  |  


  4. Hayman, B.I., 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics, 39: 789-809.
    Direct Link  |  


  5. Hayman, B.I., 1954. The analysis of variance of diallel table. Biometrics, 10: 235-244.
    Direct Link  |  


  6. Hayman, B.I., 1958. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. II. Genetics, 43: 63-85.
    Direct Link  |  


  7. Hendawy, F. A., M.S. Rady, A.M. Hamid and R.M. Esmail, 1999. Inheritance of fiber traits in some cotton crosses. Egyptian. J. Agron., 21: 35-36.


  8. Ikram, M.A., A. Masood and A. Naveed, 1993. Manipulation of combining ability and its significance in cotton (G. hirsutum L.). J. Agric. Res., 31: 145-159.


  9. Jinks, J.I. and B.I. Hayman, 1953. The analysis of diallel crosses of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Maiz Genet. News Lett., 27: 48-58.


  10. Jinks, J.L., 1954. The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross of Nicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics, 39: 767-788.
    Direct Link  |  


  11. Jinks, J.L., 1956. The F2 back cross generation from a set of diallel crosses. Heredity, 10: 1-30.


  12. Poehlman, J.M., 1986. Breeding Cotton in Breeding Field Crop. 3rd Edn., AVI Publication Inc., Westport, Connecticut, pp: 559-588


  13. Rady, M.S., F.A. Hdendawy, A.M. Hamid and R.M. Esmail, 1999. Combining ability of yield and yield components in cotton. Egypt. J. Agron., 21: 53-66.
    Direct Link  |  


  14. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0070609259, Pages: 481


  15. Subhan, M., H.U. Khan and R.D. Ahmad, 2001. Population analysis of some agronomic and technological characteristics of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), using diallel analysis. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 120-123.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  


  16. Tiwari, V.N., K.C. Mandloi and V.N. Acharya, 1992. Breeding behavior effects for yield and its components in intraspecific crosses of cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Ind. J. Agric. Res., 26: 173-178.


  17. Worley, S., T.W. Culp and D.C. Harrell, 1974. The relative contribution of yield components to lint yield of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Euphytica, 23: 399-403.
    CrossRef  |  


  18. Yingxin, L. and H. Xiangming, 1998. Research on the combining ability and inheritance of 12 economic characters in upland cotton. China Cotton, 25: 9-11.


©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved