Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Genotype-Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Soybean



M.A. Hossain , L. Rahman and A.K.M. Shamsuddin
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Genotype x environment interactions through different stability parameters and performance of the traits of genotypes were studied. The traits were; days to maturity, number of branch/plant, 100 seed weight and seed yield/plant in ten soybean genotypes across five environments represented by sowing dates. Significant difference were observed for genotypes, environments and genotype-environment interaction. Stability analysis after Eberhart and Russell’s model suggested that the genotypes used in this study were all, more or less responsive to environmental changes. Most of the genotypes perform better in Env. 3 (5th January date of sowing). Based on phenotypic indices (Pi), regression (S2di) genotype colombus was found stable for days to maturity. Shohag, BS-60, G-2120 and Cobb were identified as stable for number of branch/plant, whereas; the genotype BS-60 was found stable for 100 seed weight. The genotype BS-60 and Cobb were considered as most stable genotypes for seed yield/plant. In general the genotype BS-60 was found stable for most of the characters studied.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

M.A. Hossain , L. Rahman and A.K.M. Shamsuddin , 2003. Genotype-Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis in Soybean. Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 1026-1031.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2003.1026.1031

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jbs.2003.1026.1031

REFERENCES

1:  Allard, R.W. and A.D. Bradshaw, 1964. Implication of Genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Set., 4: 503-508.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Dabholkar, A.R., 1992. Elements of Biometrical Genetics. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp: 338-359

3:  Eagles, H.A. and K.J. Frey, 1977. Repeatability of the stability variance parameter in oats. Crop Sci., 17: 253-256.

4:  Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Joarder, O.I., S.K. Ghose and M. Salehuzzaman, 1978. Genotype environment interaction shown by yield and some of its components of Brassica campestris (L.). Z. Pflanzenziichtg, 81: 257-284.

6:  Morales, A.C., A.A. Paragas and V.R. Carangal, 1991. Phenotypic stability for grain yield in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.), Wilczek). FLCG Newslett., 16: 12-15.

7:  Singh, M., G. Singh, D.T. Dhutia and R.P. Awasthi, 1995. Stability analysis in soybean (Glycine max) in Sikkim. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 65: 757-759.

8:  Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhary, 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp: 252-269.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved