Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Performance of Red Amaranth under Shade Condition for Agroforestry Systems

M.A. Wadud , G.M.M. Rahman , M.J.U. Chowdhury and M.G. Mahboob
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Performance of red amaranth (Amaranthus gangeticus) under four levels of light- 100, 75, 50, and 25% photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was evaluated to judge its suitability for inclusion in agroforestry systems. Mosquito nets of different mesh size have been used to create desirable light levels. It was observed that in red amaranth, any reduction in PAR affected all morphological and yield parameters of red amaranth negatively. Plant height, number of leaves plant-1, leaf size, stem girth, fresh and dry yield were decreased significantly with decreasing light levels but the trend of response of different morphological parameters to different light levels were different. The mean fresh and dry yield (t ha-1) of red amaranth grown under 100, 75, 50 and 25 % PAR levels were 12.77, 9.54, 5.75, 3.19 and 1.27, 0.92, 0.55, 0.26, respectively. Therefore, red amaranth may not be included in tree-crop agroforestry system.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

M.A. Wadud , G.M.M. Rahman , M.J.U. Chowdhury and M.G. Mahboob , 2002. Performance of Red Amaranth under Shade Condition for Agroforestry Systems . Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 765-766.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2002.765.766


1:  Ali, M.A., 1999. Performance of red amaranth and lady's finger growth at different orientations and distances under guava and drumstick trees. M.Sc. Thesis, BSMRAU, Gazipur, Bangladesh.

2:  Chaturvedi, G.S. and K.T. Ingram, 1989. Growth and of low land rice in response to shade and drainage. Crop Sci., 14: 61-67.

3:  Hossain, S.M.M., 1995. Agro-ecology and varietal characteristics of leafy vegetables. A Training Manual, Summer and all Season Vegetables and Spices Production, pp: 89-92.

4:  Islam, M.S. and M.A. Haque, 1992. Soil and fertilizer for vegetables. Vegetable production and marketing. Proceeding of the National Review and Planning Workshop, July 26-29, BARI, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh, pp: 116-129.

5:  Miah, M.G., D.P. Garrity and M.L. Argon, 1995. Light Availability to the under Storey Annual Crops in an Agroforestry System. In: Ecophysiology of Tropical Inter Cropping, Sinoquet, H. and P. Cruz (Eds.). IRNA, Paris, Franch, pp: 99-107.

6:  Miah, M.G., M.A. Rahman and M.M. Haque, 1999. Performance of onion under different reduced light levels for intercropping and intercropping systems. Bull. Inst. Trop. Agric. Kyushu Univ., 22: 31-38.

7:  Nayak, S.K. and K.S. Murty, 1980. Effect varying light intensities on yield and growth parameters in rice. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 23: 309-316.

8:  Zaman, S.M.H., K. Rahim and M. Howlader, 1982. Simple Lessons from Biometry. 1st Edn., Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh, Pages: 171.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved