Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Comparative efficiency of P-Carriers in Saline Sodic Soil

S.M. Mehdi , N. Sajjad , M. Sarfraz , R. Ahmad , M. Asghar and G. Hassan
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

The results indicated that grain and straw yields, P concentration in grain and P uptake by grain and straw was increased significantly over control by the application of different sources of phosphorus. All the sources remained at par with each other in all the characteristics studied. However a careful scrutiny of the data showed maximum grain straw yields, P concentration in grain and straw and P uptake by grain and straw were with TSP followed by SSP, N/P and DAP. TSP appears a better source of phosphorus in mildly saline sodic soil.

Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

S.M. Mehdi , N. Sajjad , M. Sarfraz , R. Ahmad , M. Asghar and G. Hassan , 2001. Comparative efficiency of P-Carriers in Saline Sodic Soil. Journal of Biological Sciences, 1: 261-262.

DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2001.261.262



1:  Chhabra, R., 1985. Crop responses to phosphorus and potassium fertilization on a sodic soil. Agron. J., 77: 699-702.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Jackson, M.L., 1962. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ., USA

3:  Jalil, A., A.A. Ibrahim and E.M. Zeidan, 1979. Response of rice to foliar application of N and P under saline conditions II. Rice yield and some contributing characters. Egypt. J. Agron., 4: 105-125.

4:  Khan, G.S., 1993. Characterization and genesis of saline sodic soils in Indus plains of Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Soil Science University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

5:  Latkovics, I., 1977. Modern methods of application of fertilizers with particular regard to salinity and alkalinity conditions. Proceedings of the Indo-Hungarian Seminar on Management of Salt Affected Soils, Feb. 7-12, Kernal, India, pp: 191-201

6:  Moodie, C.D., H.W. Smith and R.A. Mcreery, 1959. Laboratory Manual for Soil Fertility. Department of Agronomy, State College of Washington, Pullman, WA., USA

7:  Muhammad, S., 1983. Salt affected soils and their reclamation, presidential address section agriculture and forestry. Proceedings of the 29th Pakistan Science Conference, December 26-30, 1983, Karachi, Pakistan, pp: 13-

8:  NFDC, 1991. Database and Records of National Fertilizer Development Center. Planning and Development Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan

9:  Niazi, M.H.K., J. Iqbal, S.M. Mehdi and K. Hussain, 1992. Comparison of different phosphorus sources for rice and wheat production in sodic soil. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 28: 305-310.

10:  Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 1st Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York

11:  US Salinity Laboratory, 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., USA

12:  Watanabe, F.S. and S.R. Olsen, 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 29: 677-678.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  World Bank, 1992. World Development Report, Development and Environment, 1992. Oxford University Press, New York, USA., ISBN: 0195208765

14:  Feigin, A., 1985. Fertilizer management of crops irrigated with saline water. Plant Soil, 89: 285-289.

15:  Munir, T.M., M. Abid and I. Ahmad, 1998. Response of wheat to different sources of phosphatic fertilizers at various exchangeable sodium percentage levels. Proceedings of the Symposium on Plant Nutrition Management for Sustainable Agricultural Growth. Dec. 1997, NFDC, Islamabad.

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved