Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Zeolite Imidazole Frameworks Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation from Natural Gas: A Review



Li Sze Lai, Yin Fong Yeong, Kok Keong Lau and Mohd Shariff Azmi
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Carbon dioxide (CO2) which exists in natural gas is one of the undesirable impurities that can reduce the caloric power of the natural gas. The implications of CO2 on the economic loss of the natural gas processing have provoked the development of CO2 separation technology. In the past decades, membrane technology has emerged as an environmental friendly, economic feasible and easy-operating method in CO2 removal. ZIFs membranes presented to be relatively new materials, which possessed high stability and good performance in CO2 separation under harsh condition. The tunability of the pore apertures and plentiful diversity of the frameworks associated with ZIFs membranes provide massive potential for the researchers to enhance the properties of ZIFs membranes in CO2 separation. This review attempts to summarize the current performance of the ZIFs membrane in CO2/CH4 separation process, considering CH4 as the main constitutions in natural gas. Extensive study on molecular structures, membrane formation and separation mechanism is emphasized on ZIF-8 membranes owing to their exceptionally high CO2 permeability. To this end, separation performance involved in ZIF-8 membrane is discussed, which affected by the synthesis method, molar composition of the growth solution and modification of the supports.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Li Sze Lai, Yin Fong Yeong, Kok Keong Lau and Mohd Shariff Azmi, 2014. Zeolite Imidazole Frameworks Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation from Natural Gas: A Review. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14: 1161-1167.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2014.1161.1167

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2014.1161.1167
 
Received: November 25, 2013; Accepted: January 05, 2014; Published: March 24, 2014



INTRODUCTION

In the past decades, natural gas has played an important role as fuel used in industrial, agricultural and transportation sectors. It is a complex gas mixture containing different kinds of gaseous components, with methane (CH4) as the main constitution and other impurities such as carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and water (H2O) (Zhu et al., 2006; Scholes et al., 2012). Recently, composition of CO2 presence in natural gas as high as 70% has been reported (Lin et al., 2006). The presence of high concentration of CO2 in natural gas can corrode the pipelines mainly due to its acidic behaviour and reduce the caloric power of the natural gas (Zhu et al., 2006). Therefore, separation of CO2 from CH4 in natural gas processing is an essential steps in order to lessen the economic losses (Drioli and Barbieri, 2011).

Membrane technologies has drawn unprecedented attention of many researchers for CO2 gas separation owing to its low energy consumption (Zornoza et al., 2013), compact and simple design (Zhu et al., 2006) environmental friendly (Lau et al., 2012), high CH4 recovery (Basu et al., 2011), smaller capital cost (Chew et al., 2011), ease of operation and easy to scaled-up (Venna, 2010). Among the different types of the existing membranes, Zeolite Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs) membrane as the sub-category of metal-organic framework (MOF) membrane has emerged as a relatively new membrane material for CO2 separation. This was mainly attributed to its remarkable properties such as exceptionally high thermal and chemical stability (Bux et al., 2009; Fairen-Jimenez et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2012), variety framework diversity with adjustable chemical functionality (Assfour et al., 2010; Fairen-Jimenez et al., 2011), high adsorption capacities, high specific surface areas and high pore volumes (Rosi et al., 2003).

The present review attempts to summarize the current performance of the ZIFs membrane in CO2/CH4 separation. Beginning with the brief introduction of ZIF and ZIFs membranes, reported literature on the performance among the ZIFs membranes in CO2/CH4 separation were summarized. In this regards, ZIF-8 membrane was chosen for extensive study due to its characteristics which are beneficial for CO2/CH4 separation. Subsequently, the molecular structures and the mechanisms involved in membrane formation and CO2/CH4 separation of ZIF-8 were presented. Furthermore, the effect of the synthesis conditions on the formation of ZIF-8 membranes including (1) synthesis method, (2) molar composition of the growth solution and (3) modification of the supports, as well as the separation performance of the resultant membranes in CO2/CH4 were discussed. Finally, concluding remarks and future directions were suggested.

ZEOLITE IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORKS (ZIFS)

ZIFs presented in formula M(Im)2, where M is the transition metal (Zn2+ or Co2+) and Im is the imidazolate linker. The transition metal cations are connected by imidazolate anions through N (nitrogen) atoms into tetrahedral frameworks, subtend at an angle of 145° at M-Im-M center that resembling the zeolite topologies (Zhou et al., 2008; Cravillon et al., 2009; McCarthy et al., 2010; Amrouche et al., 2011; Diaz et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2011; Morris et al., 2012). The pores of ZIFs are formed by 4, 6, 8 and 12-membered rings of the ZnN4 and CoN4 clusters (Venna et al., 2010). The plentiful frameworks diversity and tunable pore apertures of the ZIFs promise their potential in gas separation.

ZEOLITE IMIDAZOLATE FRAMEWORK-8 (ZIF-8) MEMBRANES

Introduction to ZIF-8 membranes: ZIFs crystals that grow continuously on porous support will form thin layer of membrane eventually. The ZIFs membranes exhibit different performance in CO2/CH4 separation as shown in Table 1 (Venna and Carreon, 2009; Huang et al., 2010; Li et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2013). Based on the reported results shown in Table 1, ZIF-8 membranes showed the highest CO2 permeance (~240x10-7mol/m2sPa) and CO2/CH4 selectivity (~7) as compared to the other types of ZIFs membranes, such as ZIF-7, -69, -90 and -9-67. Apart from its high CO2 permeance and CO2/CH4 selectivity, ZIF-8 membranes show hydrophobic characteristics and resist to some aromatic hydrocarbon such as benzene (Venna and Carreon, 2009) organic solvents and boiling alkaline water (Park et al., 2006). In addition, ZIF-8 membranes exhibit high thermal stability by sustaining the temperature up to 400°C in air and 550°C in N2 (Madhusoodana et al., 2006). The outstanding properties showed by ZIF-8 membranes reveal their advantages over other type of membranes in gas separation application under harsh condition.

Molecular structures of ZIF-8: ZIF-8 (Zn(meIm)2, meIm = 2-methylimidazole ) possesses large cavities with the size of 11.6 Å, encompassed by six-membered ring window forming small apertures of 3.4 Å (Venna et al., 2010; Fairen-Jimenez et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2011). It is classified under cubic space group I-43 m with the Zn2+ ion connected to the N atoms of meIm groups through coordination bond, forming sodalite (SOD) zeolite topology (Hu et al., 2012). Figure 1 shows the three-dimensional structure of ZIF-8 in cubic unit cell at <111> plane (Markov, 2003; Park et al., 2006).

Fig. 1:
Three-dimensional structure of ZIF-8 in cubic unit cell at <111> plane, showing large cavity (sphere region) with size 11.6Å and small apertures (six-membered ring window) with size 3.4Å. Adapted from (Markov, 2003; Park et al., 2006)

Table 1: CO2 separation performance of different types of ZIFs membranes
*CO2:CH4 = 50:50, **Ideal selectivity

Small apertures (~3.4Å size) are presented by the six-membered rings window and large cavity (~11.6Å) is presented by the sphere region.

Mechanism for ZIF-8 membrane formation: ZIF-8 membrane is formed through the continuous nucleation and crystallization process of ZIF-8 crystals on the porous supports. Initially, building unit of ZIF-8 emerges when Zn2+ cation attacks the meIm anion which is rich in electron. Nucleation process happens when each of the building unit of ZIF-8 is linked to the other building units through N atoms forming ZnN4 clusters, which connect together and form the unit cell of ZIF-8 with the window cages. After nucleation process, ZIF-8 starts to grow through the collision and particle-monomer attachment process, indicating the occurrence of crystallization. The porous supports used for synthesizing ZIF-8 membrane to date including alumina (Venna and Carreon, 2009; Bux et al., 2011; Tao et al., 2013), titania (Bux et al., 2009) and YSZ ceramic fiber (Pan et al., 2012). Those selected porous supports possess inert characteristics and did not influence the growth of the membrane. Comprehensive schematic diagram on the ZIF-8 membrane formation is presented in Fig. 2 (Banerjee et al., 2008; Friscic et al., 2013).

Mechanism for CO2/CH4 gas separation in ZIF-8 membranes: In ZIF-8 membranes, CO2 molecules permeate over the membrane through adsorption-desorption and diffusion mechanism (Chmelik et al., 2012) as displayed in Fig. 3. First, CO2 molecules are selectively attracted by ZIF-8 membrane. Then, the molecules will diffuse through the matrix of the membrane owing to the gradient of chemical potential based on Maxwell-Stefan diffusion theory (Kapteijn et al., 2000). Finally, the CO2 molecules are desorbed from the membrane to achieve equilibrium with the surrounding. Schematic diagram of the mass transfer of CO2 molecules through ZIF-8 membrane in steady state is shown in Fig. 4 (Bux, 2011). Gas phase A and B existed at the feed and permeate sides of the membrane corresponding to constant pressure and respectively. The adsorption and desorption of CO2 molecules on both sides of membrane at different pressure resulted in different concentration and chemical potentials of the molecules.

CO2 molecules are preferentially adsorbed by ZIF-8 as compared to CH4 molecules. This was due to the presence of the electrostatic potential (ESP) at the three methyl rings and the six imidazole rings of ZIF- 8 (Liu et al., 2012). Existence of ESP favours the attraction of CO2 molecules with larger quadrupolar moment (13.4x10-40 Cm2) as compared to CH4 molecules, which are non-polar with the absence of quadrupolar moment (D'Alessandro et al., 2010). Besides, the diffusivity of CO2 is larger than CH4 under the same amount of molecules loading. This was due to the larger size of CH4 molecules (~3.8Å) than CO2 molecules (~3.3 Å) that contributed to higher steric hindrance during the interaction with the window cage of ZIF-8 (~3.4Å).

Effect of synthesis conditions on the formation and CO2/CH4 gas separation of ZIF-8 membranes: There are several factors affecting the quality of ZIF-8 membranes formed such as the synthesis method, molar composition of the synthetic solution and modification of the supports through the seeding methods. Correlation between those factors and the gas separation performance (CO2/CH4 selectivity) of the membranes was compared and listed in Table 2 (Bux et al., 2009; Venna and Carreon, 2009; Bux et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2012). ZIF-8 membrane which showed highest selectivity was reported by Venna and Carreon (2009). Secondary seeded growth method was used for the synthesis with the molar composition of the synthesis solution of Zn2+: Hmim: MeOH of 1:8:700.

Table 2: Comparison for ZIF-8 membranes synthesized at different parameters
*CO2:CH4 = 50:50, **Ideal selectivity, apolyethyleneimine

Fig. 2: Schematic diagram of ZIF-8 membrane formation involved nucleation and crystallization processes, adapted from (Banerjee et al., 2008; Friscic et al., 2013)

The thickness of the resultant membrane was ~5 to 9 μm. CO2/CH4 selectivity of ZIF-8 membranes reported by Pan et al. (2012) and Bux et al. (2009) was relatively low, regardless of their thickness and different molar composition of the synthesis solution (using water (Zn2+: Hmim: H2O of 1:70:1238) or sodium formate (Zn2+: Hmim: MeOH:NaCOOH of 1:1.5:250:1)). However, microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis process reported by Bux et al. (2009) required less synthesis duration of 4 h as compared to the other methods such as in situ crystallization and secondary seeded growth (5-6 h). On the other hand, by using microwave-assisted solvothermal secondary seeded growth, Bux et al. (2011) successfully produced a thinner membrane (~12 μm) as compared to their previous work (~30 μm) using in situ crystallization (Bux et al., 2009). However, the CO2/CH4 separation performance of the resultants ZIF-8 membranes was not reported by Bux et al. (2011). Hence, the CO2/CH4 gas separation performance for ZIF-8 membrane is still in the initial stage due to inconsistency of the reported results in the literature.

Fig. 3: CO2 adsorption-desorption and diffusion mechanism of ZIF-8 membranes

Fig. 4: Schematic diagram of mass transfer of CO2 through ZIF-8 membranes in steady state, adapted from (Bux, 2011)

Formation of a thin layer of ZIF-8 membranes with low defects and excellent CO2/CH4 separation performance still remains as a challenging task. Therefore, development of a reproducible synthesis method for synthesizing high quality ZIF-8 membranes exhibit a great potential for further research study. A standardized ZIF-8 membranes formation method with the attractive properties and high CO2/CH4 separation performance need to be investigated and established.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE

The present review study provides comprehensive account on the CO2/CH4 separation from natural gas using ZIFs membranes. ZIF possess desirable properties such as high stability, large surface area and pores volumes. We have emphasized on ZIF-8 membrane due to its outstanding CO2 permeance and relatively high CO2/CH4 selectivity as compared to the other ZIFs membranes. Nevertheless, improvement of the current ZIF-8 membrane formation and its separation performance is still needed. In this vein, we suggest that further research could be carried out on the development of a feasible and reproducible synthesis method for ZIF-8 membranes. This requires the interdisciplinary understanding on the mechanism of the membrane formation and CO2/CH4 separation process. Then, the membrane can be formed by controlling the micrsostructure, thickness and eliminating the defects thus increasing its CO2/CH4 separation performance.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The financial support provided by Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS under STIRF Grant (Cost Centre: 158200-000) and YUTP-FRG (Cost Centre: 0153AA-A62) is duly acknowledged.

REFERENCES
1:  Amrouche, H., S. Aguado, J. Perez-Pellitero, C. Chizallet and F. Siperstein et al., 2011. Experimental and computational study of functionality impact on sodalite-zeolitic imidazolate frameworks for CO2 separation. J. Phys. Chem. C, 115: 16425-16432.
CrossRef  |  

2:  Assfour, B., S. Leoni and G. Seifert, 2010. Hydrogen adsorption sites in zeolite imidazolate frameworks ZIF-8 and ZIF-11. J. Phys. Chem. C, 114: 13381-13384.
CrossRef  |  

3:  Banerjee, R., A. Phan, B. Wang, C. Knobler, H. Furukawa, M. O'Keeffe and O.M. Yaghi, 2008. High-throughput synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks and application to CO2 capture. Science, 319: 939-943.

4:  Basu, S., A. Cano-Odena and I.F. Vankelecom, 2011. MOF-containing mixed-matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 binary gas mixture separations. Sep. Purif. Technol., 81: 31-40.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Bux, H., 2011. Preparation and characterization of metal-organic framework membranes for gas separation. Institute of Physical Chemistry and Eletrochemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany.

6:  Bux, H., A. Feldhoff, J. Cravillon, M. Wiebcke, Y.S. Li and J. Caro, 2011. Oriented zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 membrane with sharp H2/C3H8 molecular sieve separation. Chem. Mater., 23: 2262-2269.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Bux, H., F. Liang, Y. Li, J. Cravillon, M. Wiebcke and J. Caro, 2009. Zeolitic imidazolate framework membrane with molecular sieving properties by microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131: 16000-16001.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Chew, T.L., A.L. Ahmad and S. Bhatia, 2011. Ba-SAPO-34 membrane synthesized from microwave heating and its performance for CO2/CH4 gas separation. Chem. Eng. J., 171: 1053-1059.
CrossRef  |  

9:  Chmelik, C., J. van Baten and R. Krishna, 2012. Hindering effects in diffusion of CO2/CH4 mixtures in ZIF-8 crystals. J. Membr. Sci., 397-398: 872-891.
CrossRef  |  

10:  Cravillon, J., S. Munzer, S.J. Lohmeier, A. Feldhoff, K. Huber and M. Wiebcke, 2009. Rapid room-temperature synthesis and characterization of nanocrystals of a prototypical zeolitic imidazolate framework. Chem. Mater., 21: 1410-1412.
CrossRef  |  

11:  D'Alessandro, D.M., B. Smit and J.R. Long, 2010. Carbon dioxide capture: Prospects for new materials. Angewandte Chem. Int. Edn., 49: 6058-6082.
CrossRef  |  

12:  Diaz, K., M. Lopez-Gonzalez, L.F. del Castillo and E. Riande, 2011. Effect of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks on the gas transport performance of ZIF8-poly (1, 4-phenylene ether-ether-sulfone) hybrid membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 383: 206-213.
CrossRef  |  

13:  Drioli, E. and G. Barbieri, 2011. Membrane Engineering for the Treatment of Gases: Gas-Separation Problems with Membranes. Royal Society Of Chemistry, London, UK., ISBN: 9781849731713, Pages: 318.

14:  Fairen-Jimenez, D., S.A. Moggach, M.T. Wharmby, P.A. Wright, S. Parsons and T. Duren, 2011. Opening the gate: Framework flexibility in ZIF-8 explored by experiments and simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133: 8900-8902.
CrossRef  |  

15:  Friscic, T., I. Halasz, P.J. Beldon, A.M. Belenguer, F. Adams, S.A.J. Kimber, V. Honkimaki and R.E. Dinnebier, 2013. Real-time and in situ monitoring of mechanochemical milling reactions. Nat. Chem., 5: 66-73.
CrossRef  |  

16:  Hu, Z., L. Zhang and J. Jiang, 2012. Development of a force field for zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 with structural flexibility. J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 136. 10.1063/1.4729314

17:  Huang, A., W. Dou and J. Caro, 2010. Steam-stable zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 membrane with hydrogen selectivity through covalent functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132: 15562-15564.
CrossRef  |  

18:  Huang, H., W. Zhang, D. Liu, B. Liu, G. Chen and C. Zhong, 2011. Effect of temperature on gas adsorption and separation in ZIF-8: A combined experimental and molecular simulation study. Chem. Eng. Sci., 66: 6297-6305.
CrossRef  |  

19:  Kapteijn, F., J.A. Moulijn and R. Krishna, 2000. The generalized Maxwell-Stefan model for diffusion in zeolites: Sorbate molecules with different saturation loadings. Chem. Eng. Sci., 55: 2923-2930.
CrossRef  |  

20:  Lau, C.H., D.R. Paul and T.S. Chung, 2012. Molecular design of nanohybrid gas separation membranes for optimal CO2 separation. Polymer, 53: 454-465.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Li, Y., F. Liang, H. Bux, W. Yang and J. Caro, 2010. Zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-7 based molecular sieve membrane for hydrogen separation. J. Membrane Sci., 354: 48-54.
CrossRef  |  

22:  Lin, H., E. van Wagner, R. Raharjo, B.D. Freeman and I. Roman, 2006. High‐performance polymer membranes for natural‐gas sweetening. Adv. Mater., 18: 39-44.
CrossRef  |  

23:  Liu, D., Y. Wu, Q. Xia, Z. Li and H. Xi, 2012. Experimental and molecular simulation studies of CO2 adsorption on zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: ZIF-8 and amine-modified ZIF-8. Adsoprtion, 19: 25-37.
CrossRef  |  

24:  Liu, Y., G. Zeng, Y. Pan and Z. Lai, 2011. Synthesis of highly c-oriented ZIF-69 membranes by secondary growth and their gas permeation properties. J. Membr. Sci., 379: 46-51.
CrossRef  |  

25:  Madhusoodana, C.D., R.N. Das, Y. Kameshima and K. Okada, 2006. Preparation of ceramic honeycomb filter supported zeolite membrane modules by microwave-assisted in-situ crystallization. Key Eng. Mater., 317: 697-700.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

26:  Markov, I.V., 2003. Crystal Growth for Beginners: Fundamentals of Nucleation, Crystal Growth and Epitaxy. 2nd Edn., World Scientific, Singapore.

27:  McCarthy, M.C., V. Varela-Guerrero, G.V. Barnett and H.K. Jeong, 2010. Synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework films and membranes with controlled microstructures. Langmuir, 26: 14636-14641.
CrossRef  |  

28:  Morris, W., C.J. Stevens, R.E. Taylor, C. Dybowski, O.M. Yaghi and M.A. Garcia-Garibay, 2012. NMR and X-ray study revealing the rigidity of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C, 116: 13307-13312.
CrossRef  |  

29:  Pan, Y., B. Wang and Z. Lai, 2012. Synthesis of ceramic hollow fiber supported Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 (ZIF-8) membranes with high hydrogen permeability. J. Membr. Sci., 421: 292-298.
CrossRef  |  

30:  Park, K.S., Z. Ni, A.P. Cote, J.Y. Choi and R. Huang et al., 2006. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 103: 10186-10191.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  

31:  Rosi, N.L., J. Eckert, M. Eddaoudi, D.T. Vodak, J. Kim, M. O'Keeffe and O.M. Yaghi, 2003. Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science, 300: 1127-1129.
PubMed  |  

32:  Scholes, C.A., G.W. Stevens and S.E. Kentish, 2012. Membrane gas separation applications in natural gas processing. Fuel, 96: 15-28.
CrossRef  |  

33:  Tao, K., C. Kong and L. Chen, 2013. High performance ZIF-8 molecular sieve membrane on hollow ceramic fiber via crystallizing-rubbing seed deposition. Chem. Eng. J., 220: 1-5.
CrossRef  |  

34:  Venna, S.R., 2010. Molecular engineering design of the SAPO-34 and ZIF-8 membranes for CO2 separation from CH4 and N2. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

35:  Venna, S.R. and M.A. Carreon, 2009. Highly permeable zeolite imidazolate framework-8 membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132: 76-78.
CrossRef  |  

36:  Venna, S.R., J.B. Jasinski and M.A. Carreon, 2010. Structural evolution of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132: 18030-18033.
CrossRef  |  

37:  Xu, G., J. Yao, K. Wang, L. He, P.A. Webley, C.S. Chen and H. Wang, 2011. Preparation of ZIF-8 membranes supported on ceramic hollow fibers from a concentrated synthesis gel. J. Membr. Sci., 385-386: 187-193.
CrossRef  |  

38:  Zhang, C., Y. Xiao, D. Liu, Q. Yang and C. Zhong, 2013. A hybrid zeolitic imidazolate framework membrane by mixed-linker synthesis for efficient CO2 capture. Chem. Commun., 49: 600-602.
CrossRef  |  

39:  Zhou, W., H. Wu, T.J. Udovic, J.J. Rush and T. Yildirim, 2008. Quasi-free methyl rotation in zeolitic imidazolate framework-8. J. Phys. Chem. A, 112: 12602-12606.
CrossRef  |  

40:  Zhu, W., P. Hrabanek, L. Gora, F. Kapteijn and J.A. Moulijn, 2006. Role of adsorption in the permeation of CH4 and CO2 through a silicalite-1 membrane. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45: 767-776.
CrossRef  |  

41:  Zornoza, B., C. Tellez, J. Coronas, J. Gascon and F. Kapteijn, 2013. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: An increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 166: 67-78.
CrossRef  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved