Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

DSGE Model of American Internationalized National Innovation System and its Evolutionary Trends



Liu Jian-Hua, Li Xin and Jiang Zhao-Hua
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

DSGE (Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model) can be applied to many areas of study and produces more realistic policy recommendations. American internationalized national innovation system includes business, colleges and universities, government and overseas departments and the four-sector DSGE model of national innovation systems are built. By using econometric methods, this study forecasts the evolutionary trends of the main indicators of the American internationalized national innovation system development in 2020.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Liu Jian-Hua, Li Xin and Jiang Zhao-Hua, 2013. DSGE Model of American Internationalized National Innovation System and its Evolutionary Trends. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 2294-2299.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.2294.2299

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2013.2294.2299
 

REFERENCES
1:  Forni, L., L. Monteforte and L. Sessa, 2009. The general equilibrium effects of fiscal policy: Estimates for the Euro area. J. Public Econ., 93: 559-585.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Malley, J., A. Philippopoulos and U. Woitekc, 2009. Toreact or not? Technology shocks, fiscal policy and welfare in the EU-3. J. Eur. Econ. Rev., 53: 689-714.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Jiang, Z.H. and J.H. Liu, 2012. Regional Innovation and Ecological Efficiency Revolution. Science Pres, Beijing.

4:  Griliches, Z., 1980. Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sector. In: Development in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, Kendrickj, V. (Ed.)., University of Chicago Press, Chicaga, pp: 339-374.

5:  Griliches, Z., 1980. R&D and the productivity slowdown. J. Am. Econ. Rev., 70: 343-348.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Griliches, Z., 1986. Productivity, R&D and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. J. Am. Econ. Rev., 76: 141-154.
Direct Link  |  

7:  Griliches, Z., 1988. Productivity puzzles and R&D: Another explanation. J. Econ. Perspect., 2: 9-21.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Mairesse, J. and M. Sassenou, 1991. R&D and productivity: A survey of econometric studies at the firm level. NBER Working Paper No.3666. Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3666

9:  Guellec, D. and B.V.P. de la Potterie, 2000. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Papers, 4: 27-27.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  David, P.A., B.H. Hall and A.A. Tool, 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. J. Res. Policy, 29: 497-529.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Garcia-Quevedo, J., 2004. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. J. Kyklos, 57: 87-102.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved