Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

A Study on the Construction and Supporting Mechanisms of Tradable Green Certificates Finance System in China



Zhao Xin-Gang, Cui Lu and Feng Tian-Tian
 
ABSTRACT

Facing the energy crisis and the requirement of green power, China will implement the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) to promote the development of renewable energy during the period of Twelfth Five-Year Plan. The application prospects of Tradable Green Certificate (TGC) as financial instruments in China will be greatly vast which is a supporting policy of the RPS. This study firstly reviews researches related to the TGC market. Secondly TGC derivatives are designed to explore new financing methods for renewable energy industry. Then, This study constructs the TGC finance market system based on the combination analysis of previous studies and China’s development plan of the TGC market. Finally This study puts forward the detailed supporting mechanisms and policies for the TGC finance system making recommendations for the development of renewable energy industry and energy finance in China.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Zhao Xin-Gang, Cui Lu and Feng Tian-Tian, 2013. A Study on the Construction and Supporting Mechanisms of Tradable Green Certificates Finance System in China. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 1883-1888.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.1883.1888

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2013.1883.1888

REFERENCES
Agnolucci, P., 2007. The effect of financial constraints, technological progress and long-term contracts on tradable green certificates. Energy Policy, 35: 3347-3359.
CrossRef  |  

Amundsen, E.S., M. Fridrik, J. Baldursson and M. Birk, 2006. Price volatility and banking in green certificate markets. Environ. Res. Econo., 35: 359-387.
Direct Link  |  

Aune, F.R., H.M. Dalen and C. Hagem, 2012. Implementing the EU renewable target through green certificate markets. Energy Econo., 34: 992-1000.
Direct Link  |  

Bergek, A. and S. Jacobsson, 2010. Are tradable green certificates a cost-efficient policy driving technical change or a rent-generating machine? Lessons from Sweden 2003-2008. Energy Policy, 38: 1255-1271.
CrossRef  |  

Chen, C., R. Wiser, A. Mills and M. Bolinger, 2009. Weighing the costs and benefits of state renewables portfolio standards in the United States: A comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 13: 552-566.
CrossRef  |  

Ford, A., K. Vogstad and H. Flynn, 2007. Simulating price patterns for tradable green certificates to promote electricity generation from wind. Energy Policy, 35: 91-111.
CrossRef  |  

Fristrup, P., 2003. Some challenges related to introducing tradable green certificates. Energy Policy, 31: 15-19.
CrossRef  |  

Lemming, J., 2003. Financial risks for green electricity investors and producers in a tradable green certificate market. Energy Policy, 31: 21-32.
CrossRef  |  

Marchenko, O.V., 2008. Modeling of a green certificate market. Renewable Energy, 33: 1953-1958.
CrossRef  |  

Nilsson, M. and T. Sundqvist, 2007. Using the market at a cost: How the introduction of green certificates in Sweden led to market inefficiencies. Utilities Policy, 15: 49-59.
CrossRef  |  

Tsao, C.C., J.E. Campbell and Y. Chen, 2011. When renewable portfolio standards meet cap-and-trade regulations in the electricity sector: Market interactions, profits implications and policy redundancy. Energy Policy, 39: 3966-3974.
Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved