Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Structural and Properties Development of Expanded Austenite Layers on AISI 316L after Low Temperature Thermochemical Treatments



A. Triwiyanto, E. Haruman, M. Bin Sudin, S. Mridha and P. Hussain
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Low temperature Thermochemical treatments in fluidized bed furnace involving nitriding, carburizing, and hybrid treating, sequential carburizing-nitriding, have been conducted in the present work with the aim to improve surface properties of AISI 316L. The resulting layer is expanded austenite which is responsible to the higher hardness and better wears properties. Characterization of this expanded austenite layers were performed including XRD analysis, SEM and SPM and microhardness indentation were used to reveal the characters of the produced thin layers. The study demonstrates that hybrid treating produced a thicker layer and higher surface hardness with gentle-drop hardness profile compared to the other treatments. This is caused by the presence of dual expanded austenite γC and γN compared to individual nitriding and carburizing which only produces a single layer. XRD patterns of treated surfaces showing the absence of nitride and carbide precipitates. SPM-c haracterization reveals that expanded austenite has densely packed morphology which is responsible to the hardness improvement as well as high wear resistant surfaces.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

A. Triwiyanto, E. Haruman, M. Bin Sudin, S. Mridha and P. Hussain, 2011. Structural and Properties Development of Expanded Austenite Layers on AISI 316L after Low Temperature Thermochemical Treatments. Journal of Applied Sciences, 11: 1536-1543.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2011.1536.1543

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2011.1536.1543
 
Received: November 30, 2010; Accepted: March 21, 2011; Published: April 18, 2011



INTRODUCTION

Austenitic stainless steel is widely used in the chemical and petrochemical industry, cryogenic vessels, heat exchangers, machineries for paper, pulp, textile, pharmaceutical equipments and internal combustion engine (Abdullah et al., 2010). The type 316L is more resistant to pitting and crevice corrosion due to having more than 2 to 3% molybdenuim and less than 0.04% carbon (Bazargan-Lari and Bazargan-Lari, 2009). This type of steel has excellent corrosion resistance and forming characteristics. However, due to its inherent austenitic structure this material has relatively low hardness as well as poor wear resistance.

Sensitization is a common problem in austenitic steel where precipitation of chromium carbides (Cr23C6) occurs at the grain boundaries at elevated temperatures. This precipitation is due to the depletion of chromium from its matrix and consequently unable to produce Cr2O3 passive layer to make stainless feature. As a result, it reduces the corrosion resistance property of the stainless steel. This phenomenon causes reduction in ductility, toughness and aqueous corrosion resistance (Matula et al., 2001).

It is known that surface hardness of the steels can be increased by the addition of carbon and nascent nitrogen. In carburizing hardness is increased only by sacrificing the corrosion resistance property of the material. During the carburizing process, the carbon atoms diffuse through the surface and occupy lattice sites of the stainless steels. These excess carbon atoms have the affinity to react with the chromium present in stainless steels and form chromium carbide (Cr23C6). So as explained the sensitization property of the stainless steels comes into the picture. But in nitriding, the problem of sensitization is not encountered. Instead, diffusion of nitrogen into surface layers of steel promotes the formation of hard nitrides. In case of stainless steels, it is expected that the complex hard Fe-Cr nitrides form on the surface, which in turn could improve the wear resistance. Nitrogen is very strong austenite stabilizer and strongly promotes an austenite structure. So the advantages of nickel addition/alloying to promote an austenite structure can also be obtained by the case hardening stainless steels by nitriding. It also increases the mechanical strength substantially. Beside that, in cold forging when the higher stress was applied, the shorter die life. In order to improve die performance, nitriding and nitrocarburizing can also be proposed to improve die life (Abdullah et al., 2007).

The low temperature nitriding makes the surface layer of austenitic stainless steel hard and nitrides-free (Ichii et al., 1998). This surface layer so-called S phase can obtain the hardness around 1000 Hv and keeps good corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel (Thaiwatthana et al., 2002; Christiansen and Somers, 2006; Yamauchi et al., 2001).

On the other hand, because of the low temperature diffusion treatment the S phase has a thin layer and steep drop of hardness at the border between the hardened layer and substrate as the character of nitriding. Low temperature carburizing also forms an S phase like layer at the surface of austenitic stainless steel. These carburized layer have a gentle drop of hardness but have a lower surface hardness than that of Nitrided S phase (Sun and Bell, 2002). Futhermore, low temperature nitriding of austenitic stainless steel shows the push-in effect of dissolved carbon (Yamauchi et al., 2001; Fewell et al., 2001; Abd El-Rahman et al., 2005; Bell, 2008). Hence the case hardening process of combination carburizing-nitriding is chosen for this study. Based on these observations, the investigations in the possibility of implementing the hybrid process of low temperature nitriding-carburizing, which involves the incorporation of nitrogen and carbon simultaneously into austenitic stainless steel surface to form an alloyed zone comprising a carbon-enriched layer on the top of nitrogen-enriched layer are still challenging. The structure, thicknes and quality of the alloyed zone can be controlled by the processing parameters, such as temperature, time and gas composition in the fluidized bed. The duplex surface layer by combined carburizing and nitriding of 316 L steel should be thick and mildly dropping hardness profile. This process has similarity with the conventional nitrocarburising process for ferrous alloys. But the nature of hybrid process is apparently different to that of conventional nitrocarburising. The nitrocarburising is employed at a temperature around 570°C with the purpose to produce a carbonitride compound layer at the surface, whilst the present hybrid treating applies to austenitic stainless steels and is carried out at much lower temperatures (350-450°C) with the purpose to produce a hybrid structure without nitride and carbide formation.

The duplex surface layer produced by combined carburizing and nitriding, so called hybrid surface alloying process, on austenitic stainless steel 316 L, has demonstrated thicker layer and gentle dropping hardness profile treated in plasma chamber (Sun and Haruman, 2006). Because of push-in effect of dissolved carbon during subsequent nitriding (Yamauchi et al., 2001; Fewell et al., 2001; Abd El-Rahman et al., 2005: Ozturka et al., 2009; Tsujikawa et al., 2005a) a distinct dual layer is discernable under metallographic observation.

Fig. 1: Schematic picture of fluidized bed furnace

Nitriding of austenitic stainless steel 316 L in a fluidized bed furnace has been successfully performed (Haruman et al., 2006) but the hybrid process and the sequential carburizing- nitrding in fluidized bed furnace have not been cited elsewhere. This study describes characteristics of surface alloyed austenitic stainless steel 316 L treated by low temperature thermochemical treatment at 450 and 470°C at 8 h duration.

The schematic picture of fluidized bed furnace is shown in Fig. 1. Recent study has shown that low temperature thermochemical treatments of austenitic stainless steel is possible in a fluidized bed furnace.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The substrate material used in this study was AISI 316 L type austenitic stainless steel of following chemical compositions (in wt.%): 17.018 Cr, 10.045 Ni, 2.00 Mo, 1.53 Mn, 0.03 C, 0.048 Si, 0.084 P, 0.03 S and balance Fe. This steel was supplied in the form of 2 mm thick hot-rolled plate. Samples of 20x70 mm size rectangular coupon were cut from the plate. The sample surface was ground on 320, 600, 800, 1000, 1200 grit SiC papers and then polished using 1 μm Al2O3 pastes to the mirror finish. Before treating, these specimens were cleaned with acetone.

Nitriding, carburizing, nitrocarburising and hybrid treatments were performed at 450 and 470°C in a fluidized bed furnace having particulate alumina as fluidized particles which flow inside the chamber due to the flow of nitriding or carburizing gases. Electrical resistance heating heated the specimens. Prior to treating, the specimens were soaked in concentrated HCl (2 M) solution for 15 min duration with the purpose to remove the native oxide film that commonly forms on austenitic stainless steel and protects the metal matrix from corrosion. This oxide layer is believed to act as a barrier for diffusional nitrogen transport (ASM, 1991).

Table 1: Hybrid treatment conditions and their corresponding layer thicknesses

Table 1 shows details of each fluidized treatment conditions with specimen symbols. For example, 8(C+N) specimen was treated by nitrocarburising process for 8 h with a mixture of 80% nitrogen gas, 15% ammonia gas and 5% methane gas for 8 h. The 4C-4N specimen was processed sequentially, first treated by carburizing for 4 h followed by nitriding for 4 h. In such a sequential process, the gas mixture changes were carried out within 10 sec without temperature change.

After treatments, the surface morphology of the treated specimens were characterized using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) and further corroborated with Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM) at higher resolution for the hybrid alloyed surface. Prior to this metallographic examination the polished specimens were etched by Marbles reagent (4 g CuSO4+20 mL HCl+ 20 mL H2O). Microhardness profile with 3g load of Vickers indentation was made across each resultant layers were also performed to reveal the surface hardness of carbon autenite (γc) and nitrogen austenite (γN). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis using Cu-Kα radiation (40 kV, 150 mA) was employed to identify the produced phases from various process conditions. Thus, conforming the data from the above characterization techniques, the surface characteristics of treated specimens from various treatment conditions are determined. The specimens were further characterized by microhardness indentation and elemental analysis by EDS.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Surface morphology and topography of Hybrid treated specimens at 470°C: In t he hybrid process, both nitrogen and carbon species are simultaneously introduced into the fluidized retort at a treatment temperature sufficiently low to prevent a formation of nitride and carbide precipitates in the surface alloyed zone. This process has similarity with the conventional nitrocarburizing process for ferrous alloys. But the nature of hybrid process is apparently different to that of conventional nitrocarburizing.

Commonly, hybrid nitrocarburizing is employed at a temperature around 570°C with the purpose to produce a carbonitride compound layer at the surface, whilst the present hybrid treating applies to austenitic stainless steels and is carried out at much lower temperatures (350-450°C) with the purpose to produce a hybrid structure without nitride and carbide formation. Table 1 shows the summary of resulting layer thicknesses. For example, the hybrid 8 (C+N) specimen at 470°C has a thickness 12.2 μm and the hybrid 4C- 4N as dual stages specimen has up to 8.4 μm and its consist actually of two separate zones with a somewhat diffused interface which clearly observed under microscope but not revealed in the micrographs. The outer zone is γN and the inner zone is γC. Conversely, the hybrid nitrocarburized sample shows a distinct separation of the γN and γC layers, with the γC layer closest to the austenite substrate (as indicated in the micrograph in Fig. 2b).

Figure 2 shows the SEM micrograph of hybrid processing at 450-470°C. This hybrid treated dual layer structure was distinguishable under microscope but not clearly revealed in the present micrograph. However, using the Scanning Probe Microscopy the presence of this dual structure can be clearly seen in 3D picture, as depicted in Fig. 3 which shows that the bottom layer consisting of γC structure is more deeply attacked by the Marble etchant as compared to γN structure of the top layer and thus appears darker as indicated in the picture. The surface topography of hybrid treated specimens fr om top view and cross sectional of expanded austenite were also investigated by a scanning probe microscope. The AFM was operated in the contact mode and the measured signal height. Figure 3 shows the 3D surface topography of the specimen hybrid at 450 and 470°C for 8 h. It is observed that domains of about 1-2 microns, as observed in SEM, consist of agglomerates of granular structure and showing the results of deposition process containing some pore channel.

Figure 3a and b shows the topography of hybrid transition layer after treated at 450 and 470°C, the roughness profiles measured across the grains, also showed the presence of nano-features of dimensions of about 60 nm and about 1.84 - 2.47 μm in height. As shown in Fig. 6, the existence of carbon expanded austenite and as confirmed by XRD is located below the nitrogen expanded austenite, compared to previous study, the thickness is thinner than that produced by plasma hybrid processing.

Fig. 2: SEM micrographs of Hybrid treated specimens for 8h: (a) Nitrocraburised 450°C (b) Nitrocarburized 470°C (c) Dual stages 450°C (d) Dual stages 470°C

Fig. 3: The AFM topography of hybrid transition/interfacial layers hybrid dual stages specimens at (a) 450 and (b) 470°C

The average roughness as well as the grain size is found to increase with increase in treatment temperature. The average grain size increases from about 87.92 nm after hybrid at 450°C for 8 h to 168.2 nm on hybrid at 470°C for 8 h and the corresponding roughness values varied from 432 to 1280 nm, respectively. Figure 4a and b shows the 3D surface topography of the specimen treated at 450 and 470°C for 8 h. It is observed that domains of about 1-2 microns as observed in FESEM consist of agglomerates of smaller grains of 2470 nm.

Hardness profile: The hybrid process results in the formation of a dual layer structure with an exceedingly hard nitrogen-enriched layer on top of a hard carbon-enriched layer and nitrogen and carbon reside in the relevant layer to form a precipitation-free and supersaturated solid solution with expanded austenite structure, thus attaining increased hardness than other specimens treated by individual carburising and nitriding. The push in effect of dissolved carbon by nitrogen species in hybrid process developed a dual-thick layer and thus a gentle-drop in hardness profile was created across the layer thickness, as indicated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 4: The AFM surface topography of hybrid specimens at (a) 450°C (b) 470°C

Fig. 5: Depth profiles of microhardness

Figure 5 shows that nitriding (8N) produces a sharp-drop in hardness profile compared to other low temperature surface alloying methods due to less nitrogen diffusion in austenitic lattices. Such a gentle hardness distribution in dual layer from hybrid process is expected to be beneficial in achieving enhanced tribological and load bearing properties.

For similar treatment duration, the plasma process is reported (Tsujikawa et al., 2005b) to produce about much thicker layers compared to those of the present treatments in fluidized bed furnace. In plasma process the native oxide layer is removed mostly by bombardment of the plasma charged particles which is completely absent in conventional fluidized process. This is one of the reasons why conventional fluidized bed treatment produced small layer thickness compared to the corresponding plasma processing.

Elemental profiles of nitrogen-carbon and XRD analysis: The carbon profile investigated on 4C-4N specimen using EDS is depicted in Fig. 6. It is found that higher carbon at the deeper layer which indicates that carbon pushed-ahead by the incoming nitrogen atom and the dissolved carbon is accumulated at the front of the nitride layer which has also been reported by Tsujikawa et al. (2005a, b).

Elemental analysis of the Hybrid nitrocarburized specimen 8 (C+N) gave more carbon beyond the nitrided layer but some carbon was also observed at the surface.

The variations of chemical concentration in the hybrid nitrocarburized layer were also measured with EDS. Figure 6 shows the typical nitrogen and carbon profiles produced in treated 316L steel. It can be seen from these Figure that there are two features in the nitrogen and the carbon profiles. Firstly, the nitrogen profile on the surface of the treated layer is similar to that of nitrided 316L steel. Secondly, the maximum nitrogen concentration is on the surface and the maximum carbon concentration appears beneath as if carbon was ‘pushed’ to the middle of the layer by nitrogen.

Such distributions of nitrogen and carbon in the surface layer are likely to produce some beneficial influences upon the properties of hybrid treated 316L steel. Figure 6b shows results of nitrogen concentration on hybrid dual-stages obtained from energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) analysis. According to these curves, it can be clearly seen that the surface hybrid layer contains very high amount of nitrogen and nitrogen concentration is gradually reducing from surface to the core with distance increasing.

Fig. 6: Carbon profiles (a) and nitrogen profiles (b) along the depth

Fig. 7: Comparison of XRD patterns of hybrid treated specimens at 450 and 470 oC

Due to a low diffusion rate in the case of samples at low temperature, nitrogen penetration depth at 450°C is less than that at temperatures 470°C. However, some carbon remains in the sub-surface layer.

In the present study, the nitride and carbide precipitates were not detected by XRD analysis in the whole treated surfaces as shown in Fig. 7. This result is in close agreement with the previous works (Tsujikawa et al., 2005a; Triwiyanto et al., 2010) on individual nitriding and carburising where the formation of nitride and carbide precipitates will develop at the higher temperature of 450°C. As confirmed by XRD analysis, the nitriding treated surface layer comprises mainly the S phase or the expanded austenite.

Thermodynamically, chromium nitrides and carbides could form under the hybrid processing conditions, On the other hand, at sufficiently low processing temperature the rate of precipitation is so slow that for a short time treatment the produced N-enriched layer is precipitation-free. Analysis shows the expanded austenite (S phase) layer formed on the nitrided and carburised surfaces but with a slight displacement of diffracted angle between (2θ) between expanded nitrogen austenite (γN) and expanded carbon austenite (γC) as recorded by XRD diffractogram in the above figure. This occurrence is predictable due to dissimilar intensity of lattice distortion created by individual nitrogen and carbon dissolved in the face centered cubic (fcc) austenite lattices. The low temperature nitride and carburised layers thus have a relatively simple structure with all the incorporated nitrogen or carbon atoms residing in the austenite lattices. The carbon content is the maximum at the surface, up to 3.0 wt.% and decreases gradually towards the layer-core interface, exhibiting a diffuse type carbon and nitrogen concentration profile. Such a significant amount of carbon or nitrogen dissolved in the layer obviously leads to the supersaturation of the austenite lattices. This causes several important structural and property modifications to the austenite in the near surface region. Firstly, the austenite lattice in the surface alloyed layer is expanded as evidenced from XRD and TEM electron diffraction analysis (Tsujikawa et al., 2005b; Blawert et al., 2000). The lattice expansion in carburised layers is about 3%, as compared to 9% lattice expansion in low temperature nitrided layers. The expansion and distortion of austenite lattices result in the formation of high density dislocations and stacking faults in the carburised layer as well as nitrided layer (Tsujikawa et al,. 2005a, b) and thus resulted in an improvement of surface hardness of autenitic stainless steel.

For the hybrid process, consisting of dual layers (Fig. 2), revealed another thin interfacial layer. This interfacial layer as shown in Fig. 3 is believed to be due to the accumulation of carbon as has also been reported in literature (Sun and Haruman, 2006). The X-ray diffraction pattern of treated AISI 316L is shown in Fig. 7. γC γN are identified as the only phase present in the surface adjacent region, i.e., within the information depth for the probing X-ray beam. The position of the peaks depend on the temperature of the treatment and a slight shift towards lower 2θ angles is observed for the samples of thermochemical treatments in comparison with untreated sample. The larger amount of nitrogen incorporated in this layer is dissolved in the austenite lattice, causing lattice expansion. The lattice constant calculated from the d-spacing for the (200) plane is higher than the lattice constant calculated by the d-spacing of the (111) plane. The lattice parameter of the γN phase increases with nitrogen concentration and can be as large as 0.390 nm, as compared to 0.358 nm for face-centred cubic austenite of the substrate. This registers a lattice expansion by nearly 9% which causes significant hardening effect and induces many structural disorders in the nitrided layer, such as stacking faults, dislocations and residual stresses (Ozturka et al., 2009).

CONCLUSION

The thermochemical treatments of AISI 316L stainless steel in a fluidized bed process at 450 and 470oC demonstrate that it is possible to produce hard layer of an expanded austenite phase without precipitation of chromium carbide/nitride.

Hybrid treating which simultaneously introduces carbon and nitrogen into the substrate will produce thicker layer compared to individual carburising and nitriding. The hybrid process thus successfully integrates the low temperature nitriding and carburising processes and results in the formation of an alloyed zone characteristic of these two individual processes. As a result of nitrogen pushing effect to the carbon species during the hybrid treating, dual phase layer will form consisting of nitrogen expanded austenite at the outer region and carbon expanded austenite at the inner-region, Nitrogen expanded austenite (γN) produced by nitriding performed higher hardness value than carbon expanded austenite (γC) produced by carburising, thus a combination of these will lead to a smooth hardness profile resulting in much improved load bearing capacity of the austenitc stainless steel without compromising its corrosion resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank to Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for financing this paper in the International Conference on Plant Equipment and Reliability 2010.

REFERENCES
1:  Abdullah, S., E. Adril, A. Muchtar and A.K. Ariffin, 2010. Friction reduction in compressed natural gas direct injection engine using piston rings with diffusion chromium coating. J. Applied Sci., 10: 462-470.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Bazargan-Lari, R. and Y. Bazargan-Lari, 2009. Investigation of failure and corrosion in pipelines and tanks used in ice-cream factory: The case study. Trends Applied Sci. Res., 4: 56-61.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Abdullah, A.B., M.J. Embi, A.M.S. Hamouda and S. Shuib, 2007. Effect of design and process parameter to cold forging die design: A finite element analysis. J. Applied Sci., 7: 777-784.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Yamauchi, N., N. Ueda, K. Demizu, A. Okamoto and T. Sone et al., 2001. Stainless steel 2000. Proceedings of International Current Status Seminar on Thermochemical Surface Engineering, November 2000, Maney Publishing, Leeds UK., pp: 247-261.

5:  Fewell, M.P., P. Garlick, J.M. Priest, P.T. Burke and N. Dytlewski et al., 2001. Towards quantifying the composition of expanded austenite. Stainless steel 2000. Proceedings of International Current Status Seminar on Thermochemical Surface Engineering of Stainless Steel, Osaka, Japan, Nov. 2000, Maney Publishing, Leeds UK., pp: 177-200.

6:  Abd El-Rahman, A.M., N.Z. Negm, F. Prokert, F.M. El-Hossary, E. Richte and W. Moller, 2005. Depth-related microstructure of rf plasma nitrocarburized austenitic stainless steel. Surface Coatings Technol., 191: 140-147.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Bell, T., 2008. Current status of supersaturated surface engineered s-phase materials. Key Eng. Mater., 373-374: 289-295.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Sun, Y. and E. Haruman, 2006. Low temperature plasma surface alloying. Solid State Phenomena, 118: 85-90.
CrossRef  |  

9:  Haruman, E., Y. Sun, H. Malik, A.G.E. Sutjipto, S. Mridha and K. Widi, 2006. Low temperature fluidized bed nitriding of austenitic stainless steel. Solid State Phenomena, 118: 125-130.
Direct Link  |  

10:  ASM, 1991. ASM Committee on Gas Carburizing, Carbonitriding and Nitriding, Gas Nitriding, in ASM Handbook-Heat Treatment. Vol. 4, American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, pp: 199-221.

11:  Tsujikawa, M., N. Yamauchi, N. Ueda, T. Sone and Y. Hirose, 2005. Behavior of carbon in low temperature plasma nitriding layer of austenitic stainless stee. Surf. Coat. Technol., 193: 309-331.
CrossRef  |  

12:  Tsujikawa, M., D. Yoshida, N. Yamauchi, N. Ueda, T. Sone and S. Tanaka, 2005. Surface material design of 316 stainless steel by combination of low temperature carburizing and nitriding. Surface Coat. Technol., 200: 507-511.
CrossRef  |  

13:  Triwiyanto, A., S. Mridha and E. Haruman, 2010. Low temperature thermochemical surface treatment of austenitic stainless steel for improved mechanical and tribological. Adv. Mater. Res., 83-86: 489-496.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Blawert, C., B.L. Mordike, G.A. Collins, K.T. Short, Y. Jiraskova. O. Schneeweiss and V. Perina, 2000. Characterisation of duplex layer structures produced by simultaneous implantation of nitrogen and carbon into austenitic stainless steel X5CrNi189. Surf. Coat. Technol., 128129: 219-225.
CrossRef  |  

15:  Ozturka, O., S. Okur and J.P. Riviere, 2009. Structural and magnetic characterization of plasma ion nitrided layer on 316L stainless steel alloy. Nuclear Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Section B: Beam Interactions Mater. Atoms, 267: 1540-1545.
CrossRef  |  

16:  Christiansen, T. and M.A.J. Somers, 2006. Characterisation of low temperature surface hardened stainless steel, struers. J. Metallogr., 9: 1-17.

17:  Matula, M., L. Hyspeckaa, M. Svobodab, V. Vodareka and C. Dagbertc et al., 2001. Intergranular corrosion of AISI 316L steel. Mater. Characteriz., 46: 203-210.
CrossRef  |  

18:  Thaiwatthana, S., X.Y. Li, H. Dong and T. Bell, 2002. Comparison studies on properties of nitrogen and carbon S phase on low temperature plasma alloyed AISI 316 stainless steel. J. Surf. Eng., 18: 433-437.
CrossRef  |  

19:  Ichii, K., K. Fujimura and T. Takase, 1998. Structure of the ion-nitrided layer of 18-8 stainless steel. Kansai Daigaku Sentan Kagaku Gijyutsu Shinpojiumu Koenshu, 2: 31-40.
Direct Link  |  

20:  Sun, Y. and T. Bell, 2002. Effect of layer thickness on the rolling-sliding wear behavior of low temperature plasma-carburized austenitic stainless steel. Tribology Lett., 13: 29-34.
CrossRef  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved