INTRODUCTION
In Malaysia, most of the High Voltage Power Lines (HVPL) are 132 and 275 kV.
There are different tower designs in Malaysia according to the vendor company,
but mostly the specifications of the overhead power line design are as the Tenaga
Nasional Berhad Malaysia (TNBM) requirements (R.W. Beck Inc.,
2000). The construction of new overhead power lines, in particular, raise
many issues of an environmental, legal and physical nature in relation to the
vicinity through which those lines will pass and the effects that their construction
and operation will have on the people living nearby (Said
et al., 2004). The harmful effects of electromagnetic fields emanating
from power lines have received growing attention worldwide in recent years.
Similar to other countries, Malaysia has its fair share of public concern over
the HVPL.
Overhead HVPL produces electromagnetic fields (EMF) (NIEHSNIH,
2002). In order to determine the real effect or danger of EMF from the HVPL,
the amount of potential voltage, electric field and magnetic field should be
known specifically. The field profiles are actually depends on the tower configurations.
Thus, the power line design engineers should design the overhead power lines
that could provide the lowest and the desired field levels in the vicinity of
the power line. The electric and magnetic field levels are not always the main
consideration in the design of an overhead power line, but other parameters
related to the geometry such as the conductor type, placement of shield wires
and phase spacing play a significant part in the design in order to optimize
its electrical performance and to minimize the cost (Pretorius,
2006).
This study was carried out in respond to the public concern of the EMF caused
by the overhead power lines, 132 and 275 kV in Malaysia. There is no specific
study to evaluate the amount of each potential voltage, electric field and magnetic
field at a certain point that is for the nearfield or farfield case from the
overhead power lines, focusing on 132 and 275 kV which are commonly used in
Malaysia. The study of the electrical potential at the overhead power lines
is important in order to figure out the maximum electric voltages that are generated
at the air space, while the EMF investigation is useful as a safety precaution
to limit the exposure to the field especially to those who are living near the
overhead power line (Gregory, 1996).
The method used to evaluate the electrical potential, electric field strength
and the magnetic flux density are based on the analytical calculus (Marincu
et al., 2005). The electrical lines are considered in steady state
throughout the calculation of these fields.
HIGH VOLTAGE POWER LINES IN MALAYSIA
Figure 1 shows the power grids distribute electricity generated
at the power station via high voltage lines. In areas where power needs to be
distributed to consumers, transformers are used to convert this high voltage
into a much lower voltage at the substation. Before entering the customer’s
house or premises, another transformer is used to drop the voltage down to more
manageable levels. Normally power grids transmit electricity in three levels
of voltages; High Voltage (HV), Medium Voltage (MV) and Low Voltage (LV). The
range of voltages is (Malaysian Communications and Multimedia
Commission, 2005):
• 
LV: 1 to 1 kV (240 V, single phase; 415 V, 3 phases) 
• 
MV: 1 to 100 kV (11, 33 and 66 kV) 
• 
HV: 100 kV upwards (132, 275 and 615 kV) 
Figure 2 and 3 show the tower design with
the actual physical dimensions for 132 and 275 kV, respectively, which are widely
used in Malaysia.
Table 1: 
Details of the towers (Abdul Kudus, 2006) 

ACSR is aluminium conductor steel reinforced 
The black dots represent the conductor which is at each of the phase on both
sides. The details of these tower specifications are depicted in Table
1. The 275 kV tower is taller than the 132 kV tower.
Experiment: The computation of the electrical potential, electric field
strength and magnetic flux density around a threephase high voltage 132 and
275 kV overhead power line has been carried out using the Matlab software. An
analytical calculus method is proposed in this study as the results show a good
agreement with the experiment measurement as presented by Marincu
et al. (2005). The study was carried out in June 2009 for duration
of 12 months.
Distance of current point P(X, Y) from overhead power lines: Figure
4 shows the distance between all the six conductors to the current point.
In the calculation, r_{pk} is the distance between the phase k and the
current point P and r’_{pk} is the distance between the electrical
image of the phase k and the current point P. The r_{pk }for each phase
can be determined using the following equations (Marincu
et al., 2005):

Fig. 4: 
The distance determination between the overhead of the power
lines and current point 
The r’_{pk} can be determined using the following equations (Marincu
et al., 2005):
Electrical charge calculation on phase q_{k}: The electrical potential V and the electric field strength E depend on the electrical charges from the threephase conductor, the geometrical design of the pillar and the lines. Using the Maxwell equations for capacities, the linear distributed electrical charge on the phase conductors is:
where, [U] is the phases potential matrix (toward the earth) and (p) is the potential coefficients matrix in the form of:

Fig. 5: 
The illustration distance between all conductor points at
overhead power lines 
Where:
D_{ij} 
= 
The distance between the conductor i and j 
D'_{ij} 
= 
The distance between the conductor i and the image of the conductor j 
r_{oi} 
= 
The radius of the conductor i 
Fig. 5 shows the illustration of relationship between conductors
to another conductor. The D_{ij} and D'_{ij} are illustrated
in Fig. 5. Each conductor is assumed as a point charge and
then the distance for each conductor to another conductor point can be measured.
To determine the
substitute the p_{ij} and p_{ii} into the matrix shown in Eq. 10.
The conductor radius for both tower designs is 0.01208 m (Abdul
Kudus, 2006).
Current (I) for each conductor: The current at the specific conductor of the overhead power lines is given as:
Where:
h 
= 
Height of the conductor to the ground 
V_{max} 
= 
The maximum voltage generated by the power lines 
Z_{o,} _{line} 
= 
The impedance line for the transmission line 
r 
= 
Radius of the conductor in meter 
The real and imaginary part for the magnetic flux density obtained from the
current is given as:
The real part is:
The imaginary part is
Potential voltage, electric field strength and magnetic flux density: In this study, the formulae based on analytical calculus method are applied to find the potential voltage at a current point from the overhead power lines. The potential voltage is:
The electric fields strength at a current point P(X, Y) is given as:
where:
q_{k} is the electrical charge of the phase k, considered as a linear distribution. The magnetic fields calculation around the overhead power lines are given as:
where, β = μ_{0}/2π and μ_{0} = 4πx10^{7} H/m . B_{px} is presented with real part value while B_{py} is the imaginary part value of current (I).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A userfriendly window based for the evaluation of electrical potential and electromagnetic fields for overhead power lines has been developed and shown in Fig. 6. The inputs are the current point (X, Y). To obtain the results the calculate button should be pressed. To plot the graph, the user should select one of the three buttons at the bottom of the window.
The exposure of EMF for human standing near the power lines (on ground): A few assumptions were made in order to analyze the three component values which are the potential voltage, electric field strength and magnetic flux density. First, the value of Y was made to be 1 meter. The varying distance at the horizontal point is increase by 1 m.

Fig. 6: 
Matlab graphic user interface 

Fig. 7: 
Potential voltage versus distance 
Figure 7 shows the potential voltage versus distance for
both power lines, 132 and 275 kV. The curves for both 132 and 275 kV have the
same pattern. The value of potential voltage increases up until it approaches
the maximum value and then slowly diminishes. For 132 kV, the highest value
of the potential voltage is 2.35 V at distance X = 21 m, whereas the highest
value for 275 kV is 14.72 V at distance X = 24 m.

Fig. 8: 
Electric field strength versus distance 
The highest value of potential voltage for the 275 kV is 6 times greater than
the highest value potential voltage of the 132 kV tower.
Figure 8 shows the electric field strength versus distance
for both power lines, 132 and 275 kV. For 132 kV, the highest value of the electric
field strength is 0.0099 kV m^{1} at the distance X = 12 m.

Fig. 9: 
Magnetic flux density versus distance 
The highest value of electrical potential for 275 kV is 0.0492 kV m^{1}
at distance X = 14 m. The highest electric field strength for 275 kV is about
5 times greater than the highest electric field strength of the 132 kV tower.
After the highest value, the electric field strength decreases as the distance
X increases. The curves pattern of the electric field strength is similar to
the curves pattern of the potential voltage. The similarity of the curves pattern
is because the same value of electrical charge q_{k} is applied in order
to calculate the potential voltage and electric field strength.
Figure 9 shows the magnetic flux density versus distance for both power lines. For 132 kV, the highest value of the magnetic flux density is 0.425 μT at distance X = 1 m. The highest value of magnetic flux density for 275 kV is 0.648 μT at distance X = 2 m. The highest value of magnetic flux density for 275 kV is about 1.5 times greater than the highest magnetic flux density value for 132 kV. By referring to Fig. 9, it can be observed that the magnetic flux density is drastically decreases after the highest value and reaches the minimum value approximately 0 ìT at distance X = 28 m. The calculation of the magnetic flux density is influenced by the amount of current, I at the conductor of the overhead power lines.
Electric and magnetic fields exposure for liveline workers: This study
was conducted for 6 different exposure scenarios near a power line which represent
actual working conditions where liveline workers are likely to be exposed for
activities such as live insulator washing or live visual inspection (SEC,
2005). These scenarios were selected based on the coordination of liveline
worker while on the site. These scenarios are illustrated in Fig.
10. The calculations of electric and magnetic fields have been conducted
for all the scenarios.

Fig. 10: 
Coordinate for 6 scenarios live line worker for 132 and 275
kV towers 
The value of electric and magnetic fields of these six calculated values for each scenario was selected as the exposure level for that scenario and is presented in Table 2.
For the 132 kV tower, the highest exposure level is at scenario 4, where the
electric field strength E and magnetic flux density B are equal to 413.747 kV
m^{1} and 73482.4 μT, respectively. This corresponds to a worker
standing close to the conductor at phase 3, which is about 0.1 m away from it.
For the 275 kV tower, the highest exposure level for both E and B are equal
to 1047.8 kV m^{1} and 92014 μT, respectively, which is at scenario
2. It is corresponding to a worker standing close to conductor phase 1 and about
0.16 m away from the conductor. The value of electric field and magnetic flux
density decreases as the distance increases (Yeo et al.,
2008).
The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has recommended
limitations on the exposure to magnetic fields, electric fields and contact
currents in the frequency of 50/60 Hz. The exposure limits are for both controlled
(occupational, liveline workers) and uncontrolled (publicly accessible) environments
(NIEHSNIH, 2002). The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE)
for the electric fields and magnetic fields (magnetic flux density) for exposure
to the whole body as per the ACGIH Standards are 25.5 kV m^{1} and
1000 μT, respectively for a controlled (occupational) environment. Thus,
electric fields and magnetic fields exposure level at scenario 1, 5 and 6 for
both power lines are much lower than the limit set by the standard. This corresponds
to a worker who is far from the conductor, or standing on the ground and at
the edge of the right ofway of the transmission line.
Table 2: 
The electric field strength and magnetic flux density calculated
at the 6 scenarios for liveline worker at 132 and 275 kV towers 

CONCLUSIONS
This study presents analytical calculus method of the potential voltage, electric field strength and magnetic field around the 132 and 275 kV overhead power lines. The results show that the exposure to the public is low if they stay at least 30 m away from the power lines. The results also present the position that could be dangerous to the liveline worker. For the liveline worker, the exposure to the high electric and magnetic field could endanger their body if they stay at that particular position for a long period. This study is important and the results could be a benchmark for the evaluation of potential voltage, electric field and magnetic field for the overhead power lines in Malaysia.
A userfriendly windows application for the evaluation of potential voltage, electric field and magnetic field based on the analytical calculus method has been developed. The simulation indicates that the developed visualization is helpful to understand analysis results and can be used as a simple tool to estimate the fields for the overhead power lines.