Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Biosorption of Manganese in Drinking Water by Isolated Bacteria



H.A. Hasan, S.R.S. Abdullah, N.T. Kofli and S.K. Kamaruddin
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Water is an important nutrition for living thing, such as humans, animals and plants. Nowdays, it has been polluted with inorganic contaminants which are discharged from industries. Manganese is one of the inorganics contaminant that causes low hemoglobin level, neurotoxicity, pipes clogging and bad taste if the concentrations in water exceed the regulated limit. A biological treatment process was investigated to treat the manganese through the biosorption mechanism by using Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) system. The microbes were taken from sewage activated sludge and isolated in agar media and identified by using Biolog Microstation System. These microbes included both Gram positive and Gram negative groups and the morphology were rod shape (Bacillus). The screening test has been done to select the highest manganese uptake by these strains and further studies under laboratory condition as a function of pH, biosorbent dosages and manganese toxicities were investigated comparison with biosorbent of sewage activated sludge. The biosorption isotherms were fitted with Langmuir to represent the equilibrium of the maximum manganese uptake by bacteria. The screening resulted that HAH1 has a higher manganese uptake capacity than others strain with 13.31 mg Mn2+/g biomass at pH 6 and biomass dosage of 0.1 g. The further studies resulted, manganese biosorption increased with rise in pH, biosorbent dosages and manganese toxicities. The Langmuir isotherm model revealed HAH1 was a better biosorbent of manganese than sewage activated sludge with the maximum biosorption capacity (qmax) of 55.56 mg Mn2+/g biomass and Kd value of 133.44.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

H.A. Hasan, S.R.S. Abdullah, N.T. Kofli and S.K. Kamaruddin, 2010. Biosorption of Manganese in Drinking Water by Isolated Bacteria. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10: 2653-2657.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.2653.2657

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2010.2653.2657
 

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the usage of heavy metals such as manganese, iron, zinc, chromium, nickel and arsenic in the industries has increased dramatically. These heavy metals will be pollutants to drinking water if the discharged concentration in the river exceeds the limit. Manganese in drinking water highly toxic to the living thing and environment which is causes gastrointestinal accumulation (Henrik et al., 2004), low haemoglobin levels (Burgoa et al., 2001), neurotoxicity (Veliz et al., 2004), bad taste, water look brown and pipe clogging. This pollutant is released into the environment by industries such as fertilizer, petrochemical, electroplating, tanneries, metal processing and mining (Parvathi et al., 2007). The Ministry of Health Malaysia has regulated that the concentration of manganese in raw water is below than 0.2 mg L-1 while in treated water is below 0.1 mg L-1.

Biological process is a good alternative to treat manganese in drinking water than the conventional process. The advantages of biological process are such that no chemical usage, low operation and maintenance cost (Pacini et al., 2005), process can be operated in a small scale (Gage et al., 2001) high efficiency in detoxifying effluents and no nutrient requirements (Jianlong et al., 2001). Manganese biosorption in the Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) is an application of the biological process for manganese treatment in drinking water. According to previous studies (Atkinson et al., 1998), bacteria, algae, fungi and yeast are found to be capable of efficiently manganese biosorption. These microorganisms have a higher capacity for manganese removal and the uptake of manganese are selective than the conventional method.

The aim of this study is to isolate the bacteria from Sewage Activated Sludge (SAS) system for manganese biosorption study. The effects of pH, biosorbent dosages and manganese toxicities and on the manganese biosorption capacity of the isolated bacteria are studied extensively. The manganese biosorption isotherms of the strain are fitted with Langmuir isotherm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation and identification procedures: Sewage activated sludge was collected from aeration tank of sewage treatment plant located at Putrajaya, Malaysia and was cultured in reactor 10 L. After a few days, the activated sludge was serially diluted with distilled water from 10-1 to 10-5. About 0.1 mL sample were taken and spread on nutrient agar and incubated in a growth chamber (GC 1050, Protech) at 37°C for 2 days. The isolated colonies in the agar plats were taken and growth for a few times to get the pure culture. Gram staining was done to identify the group of strains for start up identification. The strains will be identified by using Biolog Microstation System; Gram Negative 2 (GN2) and Gram Positive (GP2) Microplate for the future work.

Strain cultivation: The strains of each isolate were grown in 250 mL conical flasks containing 150 mL of nutrient broth and cultivated in shaking incubator (S1-600R, Japan) at 150 rpm and 37°C for 24 h. The cultivation was harvested by means of a centrifuge (Kubota 5220, Japan) at 350 rpm for 15 min. After two rinses with distilled water, the cells were suspended in distilled water to prepare the biomass stock solution. The biomass stock concentration was determined gravimetrically by dry weight at 105°C for 24 h.

Manganese biosorption studies: A batch experimental was setup using 250 mL conical flasks containing 100 mL of 50 mg Mn2+/L solution. This method was adapted from previous studies about manganese biosorption by yeast and fungi (Parvathi et al., 2007). Manganese solution was prepared using MnCl2.4H2O (ChemAR). The biosorbents of cell culture was suspended in the manganese solution and incubated at 150 rpm on shaking incubator (S1-600R, Japan) at 37°C for 24 h. Samples were withdrawn at periodic intervals and were centrifuged (Eppendorf 5804, Germany) at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was analyzed by using Adsorption Atomic Spectrometer (AAnalysat 800, USA) and the manganese uptake by the biosorbents was calculated using the following equation (Vieira and Volesky, 2000):

(1)

Where:

qe = The manganese uptake (mg Mn2+/g biomass)
V = The volume of the manganese solution (mL)
Ci = The initial concentration of manganese in the solution (mg Mn2+/L)
Ce = The final concentration of manganese in the solution (mg Mn2+/L)
X = The dry weight of the biomass (g)

Effect of pH: To study the effect of pH on the manganese biosorption, the initial pH of the solution was fixed to a range of pH 3-9 using either 0.1 M NaOH or 0.1 M HNO3. The pH of the solution was control using pH meter (CyberScan 510, Singapore) at periodic intervals.

Effect of biosorbent dosage: The concentrations of bacteria used for the study were 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0% (w/v). The cell suspension was mixed in the manganese solution with a concentration of 50 mg Mn2+/L and pH 5.5-6 was maintained.

Effect of manganese toxicities: To investigate the effect of manganese toxicities on manganese uptake by biosorbents, the initial concentration of manganese was set in range of 25-300 mg Mn2+/L. A constant of 0.1 g of biosorbent dosage was suspended in the solution and pH 5.5-6 was maintained.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Bacterial identification and enhancement: Six colonies were found and isolated on a fresh nutrient agar plates for the pure culture growth. The start up identification was performed by using Gram staining procedure and observation on the colonies as shown in Table 1. Most of these isolated bacterial were rod morphology and belonged to a wide variety of species including Gram negative and Gram positive. Reported by Kasan and Beacker (1989), these species are several commonly found in activated sludge, especially Pesudomonas, Bacillus and Aeromonas.

Screening test for manganese biosorption: The isolated bacterial and mix culture from SAS were exposed to a few set of manganese solution with 50 mg Mn2+/L concentration and were incubated for 24 h retention time. The screening shows species HAH1 has a higher biosorption capacity than the other biosorbents as shown in Fig. 1.


Table 1: Start up identification of bacterial from SAS

Fig. 1: Manganese biosorption with different isolated bacteria at 24 h retention time

Fig. 2: Effect of pH on manganese biosorption

It is shown that the isolated HAH1 produce more extracellular polymers, which provide surface sites for adsorbing and complexing heavy metals (Leung et al., 2001). In addition, all of the cell wall of isolated bacteria have some chemical functional groups which play vital roles in biosorption, including carboxyl, phosphonate, amine and hydroxyl groups (Doyle et al., 1980; Van der Wal et al., 1997; Vijayaraghavan and Yun, 2008).

Effect of pH, biosorbent dosage and manganese toxicities on manganese biosorption
Effect of pH:
The favourable pH for metals biosorption by bacterial biomass has been found in a range of pH 3-6 (Vijayaraghavan and Yun, 2008). The manganese biosorption by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18 had been showing higher biosorption at pH 7 with maximum biosorption capacity of 38.2 mg Mn2+/g biomass (Silva et al., 2009). As shown in Fig. 2, manganese biosorption increased with increasing pH of the manganese solution, but not in a liner relationship. For instance, at pH 3 the manganese uptakes were 0.34 and 0.14 mg Mn2+/g biomass for HAH1 and SAS, respectively.


Fig. 3: Effect of biosorbent dosages on manganese biosorption by HAH1 and SAS

In addition, the lowest uptakes could be attributed to competition between ion Mn2+ and the abundant ion H+ in the solution for attachment to binding sites of the biosorbents (Parvathi et al., 2007). The optimum manganese uptake by these two biosorbents increased to 6.57-14.84 mg Mn2+/g biomass and 1.40-13.90 mg Mn2+/g biomass at pH 5-7, which are its uptake, seems to be constant at pH 7-8.

Biosorbents dosage: The manganese uptake increased with the concentration of biosorbents HAH1 and SAS dosage as shown in Fig. 3, due to the increased surface area of these two biosorbents, which in turn increases the number of binding sites (Esposito et al., 2001). Biosorbents HAH1 recorded higher manganese uptake than the SAS with 2.1, 3.8, 4.8, 5.4 and 12.4 mg Mn2+/g biomass for HAH1 dosage of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, manganese uptakes by SAS were 1.1, 2.8, 3.2, 4.7 and 8.5 mg Mn2+/g biomass. Although at low biosorbent dosage, HAH1 adsorbed higher amount of manganese as compared to SAS which were attributed to chemical functional groups (carboxyl, phosphonate, amine and hydroxyl groups) and physical characteristics (moisture, soluble and iorganics contents) in biosorbents.

Manganese toxicities: The initial manganese concentrations have effect on biosorption process, which is higher concentration resulting in a high manganese uptake by biosorbents (Vijayaraghavan and Yun, 2008; Binupriya et al., 2007). As shown in Fig. 4, increased the manganese concentration from 25-300 mg Mn2+/L resulted in an increase of manganese uptake by HAH1 and SAS from 6.6-33.8 mg Mn2+/g biomass and 4.3-25 mg Mn2+/g biomass, respectively. Instead, the manganese biosorption by fungus (Aspergillus niger) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) with increasing manganese concentration from 25-200 mg Mn2+/L, the uptake were 2.46-19.34 mg Mn2+/g biomass and 1.54-18.95 mg Mn2+/g biomass (Parvathi et al., 2007), respectively.


Table 2: Comparison of manganese biosorption capacity of HAH1 with different biosorbents

Fig. 4: Effect of manganese toxicities on biosorption by HAH1 and SAS

On the other hand, Table 2 presents the comparison of manganese biosorption capacity of HAH1 with others biosorbent as functional of manganese toxicities and biosorbent dosages.

Biosorption isotherms: Biosorption isotherms provide the surface properties and affinity of the biosorbent and can be used as comparison in biosorptive capacity of the biomass for different heavy metals. The metal uptake by microorganisms has been shown to occur in two stage: an initial rapid stage (passive uptake), followed by a much slower process (active uptake) (Goyal et al., 2003). In line of the rapid equilibrium, the Langmuir isotherm was chosen for fit the experimental data to evaluate the biosorption behavior on biosorbents.

Langmuir isotherm:

(2)

where, qmax is the maximum manganese specific uptake (mg g-1) and Kd represents the equilibrium constant of biosorption reaction. This model was linearized as followed to obtain qmax and Kd, values from the plot.


Table 3: Kinetic parameters for Langmuir isotherm with different biosorbents

Fig. 5: Langmuir biosorption isotherms of manganese on HAH1 and SAS

(3)

The Langmuir equilibrium isotherm of HAH1 was represented on Fig. 5, as comparison with SAS. The model shows that HAH1 was a better biosorbent for manganese biosorption than SAS as shown in Table 3, which was the maximum manganese biosorption; qmax was 55.56 mg Mn2+/g biomass and Kd value of 133.44.

CONCLUSION

The isolation of mixed culture from the sewage activated sludge showed there were six dominants bacteria. These bacteria were Gram positive and Gram negative groups. Screening test for manganese biosorption resulted that HAH1 had higher manganese uptake than others strains with 13.31 mg Mn2+/g biomass. The subsequent studies resulted that increasing the pH, biosorbent dosages and manganese toxicities, the uptakes also increased. The Langmuir biosorption isotherm proved that the HAH1 was a better biosorbents than the sewage activated sludge, with the maximum manganese biosorption, qmax of these two biosorbents were 55.56 mg Mn2+/g biomass, 10 mg Mn2+/g biomass and Kd value of 133.44 and 25.28, respectively. In future work, the isolated bacteria will be identified by using Biolog Microstation System; Gram Negative 2 (GN2) and Gram Positive (GP2) Microplate.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was financially supported by Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) with grant number 02-01-02-SF0367.

REFERENCES
Atkinson, B.W., F. Bux and H.C. Kasan, 1998. Consideration for application of biosorption technology to remediate metal-contaminated industrial effluents. Water Res., 24: 129-135.
Direct Link  |  

Binupriya, A.R., M. Sathishkumar, D. Kavitha, K. Swaminathan, S.E. Yun and S.P. Mun, 2007. Experimental and isothermal studies on sorption of Congo red by modified mycelial biomass of wood-rotting fungus. Clean: Soil Air Water, 35: 143-150.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Burgoa, C.S., C. Rios, L.A. Mercado, S.A. Serrano and F.C. Valle et al., 2001. Exposure to manganese: Health effects on the general population, a pilot study in central Mexico. Environ. Res., 85: 90-104.

Chojnacka, K., 2007. Biosorption and bioaccumulation of microelements by Riccia fluitans in single and multi-metal system. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 2919-2925.
CrossRef  |  

Doyle, R.J., T.H. Matthews and U.N. Streips, 1980. Chemical basis for selectivity of metal ions by the Bacillus subtilis cell wall. J. Bacteriol., 143: 471-480.
Direct Link  |  

Esposito, A., F. Pagnanelli, A. Lodi, C. Solisio and F. Veglio, 2001. Biosorption of heavy metals by Sphaerotilus natans: An equilibrium study at different pH and biomass concentrations. Hydrometallurgy, 60: 129-141.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Gage, B., D.H.O. Dowd and P. Williams, 2001. Biological iron and manganese removal pilot and full scale applications. Proceedings of the Water Works Association Conference, May 3, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Goyal, N., S.C. Jain and U.C. Banerjee, 2003. Comparative studies on the microbial adsorption of heavy metals. Adv. Environ. Res., 7: 311-319.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Henrik, S., M.D. Thomsen, O.D.V.M. Svendsen and S. Klastrup, 2004. Increased concentration in the liver after oral intake. Acad. Radiol., 11: 38-44.

Jianlong, W., Z. Xinmin, D. Decai and Z. Ding, 2001. Bioadsorption of lead (II) from aqueous solution by fungal biomass of Aspergillus niger. J. Biotechnol., 87: 273-277.
Direct Link  |  

Kasan, H.C. and A.A.W. Baecker, 1989. Activated sludge treatment of coal-gasification effluent in a petrochemical plant–II. Metal accumulation by heterotrophic bacteria. Water Sci. Technol., 21: 297-303.
Direct Link  |  

Leung, W.C., H. Chua and W. Lo, 2001. Biosorption of heavy metals by bacteria isolated from activated sludge. Applied Biochem. Biotechnol., 91-93: 171-184.
CrossRef  |  

Mohamed, Z.A., 2001. Removal of cadmium and manganese by a Non-toxic strain of the freshwater cyanobacterium Gloeothece magna. Water Res., 35: 4405-4409.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Pacini, V.A., A.M. Ingallinella and G. Sanguinetti, 2005. Removal of iron and manganese using biological roughing up flow filtration. Water Res., 39: 4463-4475.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Parvathi, K., R. Nareshkumar and R. Nagendran, 2007. Biosorption of manganes by Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 23: 671-676.

Silva, R.M.P., A.A. Rodriguez, J.M.G.M. De-Oca and D.C. Moreno, 2009. Biosorption of chromium, copper, manganese and zinc by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AT18 isolated from a site contaminated with petroleum. Bioresour. Technol., 100: 1533-1538.
CrossRef  |  

Van der Wal, A., W. Norde, A.J.B. Zehnder and J. Lyklema, 1997. Determination of the total charge in the cell walls of gram-positive bacteria. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 9: 81-100.
Direct Link  |  

Veglio, F., F. Beolchini and A. Gasbarro, 1997. Biosorption of toxic metals: An equilibrium study using free cells of Arthrobacter sp. Process Biochem., 32: 99-105.
Direct Link  |  

Veliz, G.D.M.S., P. Gomez, M.T. Dossi, J. Montiel, C. Arriagada, F. Aboitiz and S. Aguilar, 2004. Behavioral effects of manganese injected in the rat substantia nigra are potentiated by dicumarol, a DT-diaphorase inhibitor. Pharmacol. Biochem., 7: 245-251.

Vieira, R.H. and B. Volesky, 2000. Biosorption: A solution to pollution? Int. Microbiol., 3: 17-24.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Vijayaraghavan, K. and Y.S. Yun, 2008. Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol. Adv., 26: 266-291.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved