Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran



I. Maghfouri-Moghadam, R. Zarei-Sahamieh, A. Ahmadi-Khalaji and Z. Tahmasbi
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The Tarbur Formation is a predominately carbonate lithostratigraphic unit that outcrops in Zagros basin, between main Zagros reverse fault and high Zagros and east of Sabzpushan faults. This Formation was studied from microbiostratigraphic point of view at four measured sections, in the north of Khorram Abad (Robat section) in the east of Khorram Abad (Chamsngar section) in the east of Shirz (Sarvestan section) and in the south east of Semirum (Balghar section). Microbiostratigraphical data mainly based on foraminifera which among them, species of Loftusia have more variety and abundance, so the species of Loftusia from the measured sections are used to determine the age of successions. It is analogous to Omphalocyclus-Loftusia assemblage zone but according to the distribution of the index species of Loftusia the age of Tarbur Formatoin is Early-Middle Maastrichtian at Sarvestan section and Middle Maastrichtian for Balgar, Robat and Chamsangar sections.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

I. Maghfouri-Moghadam, R. Zarei-Sahamieh, A. Ahmadi-Khalaji and Z. Tahmasbi, 2009. Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9: 1781-1785.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.1781.1785

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2009.1781.1785
 

INTRODUCTION

The Tarbur Formation is carbonate sediments that extends from southeastern to northwestern of Zagros basin along the western edge of the Imbricated Zagros zone and between Main Zagros reverse fault and High Zagros fault and east of Sabzpushan fault (Alavi, 2004). High Zagros fault consists of several part, north to south, Sefid kuh, Zard kuh, Dena and Bakhtegan faults (Fig. 1 ). Southern outcrops of Tarbur Formation are between Sabzpushan and high Zagros fault. Facies and thickness contour maps controls and field investigation revealed that the Sabzpushan fault was frequently active from Middle Cretaceous (Cenomanian) to recent time (Safari, 2006). At Campanian-Maastrichtian, facies changed of Gurpi shale and marl, west of Sabzpushan fault, to Tarbur limestone, east of this fault (Ghazban, 2007).

This study relates to foraminifera from four stratigraphic sections (Fig. 1 ), 10 km north of Khorram Abad, Robut section, 30 km east of Khorram Abad, Chenar section, 18 km southwest of Semiroum Balgar section and 39km southeast of Shiraz, Sarvestan section. During Late Cretaceous the Arabian plate was subjected to both compressional and extensional stresses (Sharland et al., 2001).

Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Fig. 1: Location map of sections referred to in text, B: Balghar section, C: Chamsangr section, S: Sarvestan section, R: Robat section (without scale)

Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Fig. 2: Schematic cross-section through Zagros basin in Campanian-Mastrichtian

In north margin of Arabian plate, compressional stresses illustrated by the uplift of main Zagros reverse fault and High Zagros fault. This compression commend in Iran, Iraq and Oman in Middle Turonian with the initiation of obduction of ophiolith complex. This resulted deep water foreland basin along northeast plate margin (Lippard et al., 1986).

Foreland basin was in turn separated from what remained of Neotethys by a NW-SE trending high which later formed the Zagros imbricated zone (Stoneley, 1974).

The Gurpi Formation was deposited during Santonian-Middle Paleocene along the main through in an upwelling and foredeep environment. Also, late Cretaceous orogenic phase (Laramid) caused uplift of imbricated zone. The products of this phase were turbidity deposits along the main thrust Zagros (Amiran Formation).

According to the eustatic curve of Haq et al. (1988) a eustatic transgressive occurred in Middle Campanian-Maastrichtian. During this time, an association of rudist-rich thrived sediment was formed along the south eastern Neotethys (Stubar and Loser, 2000). This rock unit is called Tarbur Formation in Zagros Mountains (Fig. 2).

James and Wynd (1965) gave the name Tarbur Formation to a carbonate sequence of Campanian-Maastrichian. Biostratigraphic criteria of the Tarbur Formation was Studied by Wynd (1965) that divided this formation into two biozones, Monolepidobis-Orbitpides Assemblage zone (Campanian in age) and Omphalucyclus-Loftusia Assemblage zone (Masstrichtian in age).

James and Wynd (1965), Kalantari (1976), Khosrow-Tehrani and Afghah (2004) and Maghfuri (2006) reviewed and described the lithological and micro faunal characterizes of the Tarbur Formation. Most investigation of this formation is based at interior Fars (southern interior imbricated zone). In this area, Tarbur Formation lies between Gurpi Formation at the base and Sachun Formation at the top. But toward northwest, in Balgar section, the sediments of the Tarbur Formation lie between Gurpi and Amiran Formations. In Robat and Chamsangar sections, this formation lies between Amiran Formation at the base and Kashkan Formation at the top.

LITHO-STRATIGRAPHY

Lithological characteristics of the Tarbur Formation at the Sarvestan section consist of 400 m limestone which divided in to two parts. Lower part consists of massive rudist bearing gray limestone, slightly dolomitized at basal part and medium rudist bearing white limestone (188 m) at top. Irons nodular are present at exposed layer of Tarbur Formation.

At Balgar section, Tarbur Formation consists of medium to massive organodetrial gray limestone (101 m).

The thickness of Tarbur Formation in Chamsangar section is 71 m and consists of thick light gray limestone. In Robat section, the thickness of Tarbur Formation is 61 m and contains of medium gray limestone with amount of rudist fragment.

BIOSTRATIGRAPHY

The following benthonic foraminifera are identified in limestone of the Tarbur Formation at Sarvestan (Fig. 3a):

Omphalocyclus macroporus, Loftusia coxi, L. minor, L. morgani, sidrolites calcitropoides, rotalia c.f trochidiformis, lepidorbitoides sp., Orbitoides apiculata, An-talyna korayil.

The following microfauna are identified in the sediments of the Tarbur Formation at Balgar section (Fig. 3b):

Omphalocyclus macroporous, Loftusia minor, Loftusia sp., Dicyclina sp. and Valvulammina sp.

In Chamsangar section, the following benthonic foraminifera are identified (Fig. 3c, 4a-h):

Omphalocyclus macroporous, Orbitides media, Loftusia minor, L. elongata, Sidrolites calcitropoides, Rotalia skorensis and Minoxia sp.

The following index microfauna are identified in Robat section (Fig. 3d):

Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Fig. 3: Selected faunal distribution of the Tarbur Formation at: (a) Sarvestan, (b), Balgar, (c) Chamsangar and (d), Robat sections

Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Image for - Microbiostratigraphy of the Tarbur Formation, Zagros Basin, Iran
Fig. 4:
Representative foraminifera of the Tarbur Formation, (a): Luftosia harisoni, Equatorial section (X17), Sample No. Tar-26; (b): Luftosia minor, Axial section (X17), Sample No. Tar-30; (c): Luftsia elongata, Axial section (X17), Sample No. Tar 26; (d): Dicyclina sp., Equatorial section (X17), Sample No. Tar-30; (e): Omaphalocyclus sp., Axial section (X17), Sample No. Tar 19; (f): Cuneolina sp., Axial section (X17), Sample No. Tar3; G: Obitoides media, Axial section (x40) Sample No. 21 and (h): Valvulammina sp., Axial section (X17), Sample No. Tar1 9

Loftusia elongata, L. minor. L. coxi, L. harisoni, Dicyclina sp., Minoxia sp. and Antalynia korayi.

Based on these assemblages of microfauna and comparison with other parts of Middle East (Al Sharhan and Nairn, 1990; Al Sharhan and Kendal, 1991; Henson, 1948) and with other distribution of Loftusia (Meric and Mojab, 1977) the outcrops of the Tarbur Formation at Sarvestan section is Early-Middle Maastrichtian and in other studied section is Middle Maastrichtian in age.

DISCUSSION

Tarbur Formation is predominantly Carbonate unit in the Imbricated zone (southwest of Iran) and contains of rich association of larger foraminifera. Because of absent of planktonic foraminifera biocorrelation of the Tarbur Formation with international subdivision of Cretaceous time scale is difficult. So, Wynd (1965) did not divided Campanian or Masstrichtian stages to substages, based on the larger foraminifera, in the Tarbur Formation. Publications dealing with larger foraminifera of the Zagros and other part of southern Neothetys are relatively few, despite there being many exposures that yield them. Meriç and Mojab (1977) and Meric and Gormuz (2001) noted the biostratigraphicaly importance of Loftusia species in Southern Neotethys. They divided Maastrichtian by ranges of the different species of Loftusia. Based on Loftusia species and other microfauna, the exposed rocks of the Tarbur Formation at Sarvestan is Early-Middle Maastrichtian and in Balgar, Chamsangar and Robat sections is Middle Maastrichtian.

The index foraminifera of Campanian age could not find at studied section. The Loftusia associations, reported in this study are most abundant foraminifera in Maastrichtian carbonate rocks which known from other parts of Southern Neotethys.

Comparison of the Early-Middle Maastrichtian Loftusia species indicates broad similarity with those of the same age from Turkey, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Oman (Meric and Mojab, 1977; Meric and Gormuz, 2001).

These similarities suggest that they were part of southern margin of Neotethys Ocean until there are no reports of the occurrence of Loftusia in other part of Iran.

REFERENCES
1:  Alavi, M., 2004. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution. Am. J. Sci., 304: 1-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Al Sharhan, A.S. and A.E.M. Nairn, 1990. A review of the Cretaceous formation in the Arabian Peninsula and Gulf, part 3, Upper Cretaceous (Aruma Group) stratigraphy and paleogeography. J. Petrol. Geol., 13: 247-266.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Al Sharhan, A.S. and C.G.S.T. Kendal, 1991. Cretaceous chronostatigraphy unconformities and eustutic sea-level changes in the sediments of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Creta. Res., 12: 379-400.
Direct Link  |  

4:  Ghazban, F., 2007. Petroleum Geology of Persian Gulf. Tehran University and National Iranian Oil Company Publisher, Iran, ISBN: 964-03-9420-3, pp: 707.

5:  James, G.A. and J.G. Wynd, 1965. Stratigraphic nomenclature of Iranian oil consortium agreement area. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 49: 2182-2245.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Kalantari, A., 1976. Microbiostratigraphy of the Sarvestan area, Southwestern Iran. National Iranian Oil Company, Geological Laboratory Publication No. 5, pp: 24.

7:  Khosrow-Tehrani, K. and M. Afghah, 2004. Microbiostratigraphy and microfacies of Tarbur formation, North Eastern of Shiraz. Geoscience, 112: 74-87.

8:  Lippard, S.J., A.W. Shelton and I.G. Guss, 1986. The ophiolith of Northern Oman. Geol. Soci. Lond. Mem., 11: 178-178.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Maghfuri, M.I., 2006. Paleontology and paleoenvironment of Tabor formation in Khoram Abud area. Geoscience, 15: 38-45.

10:  MeriƧ, E. and F. Mojab, 1977. World-wide geographical distribution of the species of the foraminiferal genus loftusia. Istabul Univ. Fen Fakiiltesi Dergisi, Seri B, 42: 143-155.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Meric, E. and M. Gormuz, 2001. The genus loftusia. Micropal, 47: 1-71.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Safari, H., 2006. Tectono-sedimentary setting of Sabzpushan fault zone in zagros basin evolution Iran, Shahid Chamran University. J. Sci., 14: 77-89.
Direct Link  |  

13:  Sharland, P.R., A. Ramond, M. Casey, R.B. Davis, S.H. Hal, A.P. Heward, A.D Horbury and M.D. Simmons, 2001. Arabia Plate Sequence Stratigraphy Geoarabia. Special Publication, Manama, Bahrain, pp: 372.

14:  Stoneley, R., 1974. Evolution of the Continental Margins Bounding a Former Southern Tethys. In: The Geology of Continental Margins, Ih Burk, A.C. and C.L. Drake Tethys (Eds). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, UK., pp: 889-903.

15:  Stubar, T. and H. Loser, 2000. Species richness and abundance pattern of Tethyan Cretaceous rudist, bivalves (Mollusca: Hippuritacea) in the Central-Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, analysed from a paleontological data base. Paleogeo. Paleoclim. Paleoecol., 162: 75-104.
Direct Link  |  

16:  Henson, F.R.S., 1948. Larger Imperforate Foraminafera of South Western Asia, Larger Imperforate Foraminifera of Southwestern Asia: Families Lituolidae, Orbitolinidae and Meandropsinidae. British Museum (Natural History), London, pp: 1-127.

17:  Wynd, J., 1965. Biofacies of Iranian oil consortium agreement area. IOOC Report, 1082.

18:  Haq, B.U., J. Hardenbol and P.R. Vail, 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the triassic. Science, 235: 1156-1167.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved