Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

An Analysis of Utilizing Helicopter Logging in Turkish Forestry



A.E. Akay, H.H. Acar and J. Sessions
 
ABSTRACT

Harvesting operations in Turkey are performed using traditional methods employing mostly animals and manpower for skidding and tractors mainly for winching. To apply these methods efficiently, the trees have to be bucked into short lengths logs (3-4 m), which reduces log values and overall profits. To produce longer logs, aerial harvesting methods such as cable logging and helicopter logging could be implemented, especially in productive forests located in steep mountainous regions of Turkey. Almost all of the forests in Turkey are state forests and managed by the General Directorate of Forestry (GDF). The GDF uses helicopters in firefighting activities; however, helicopters have not been used in harvesting operations. Using helicopters in both firefighting and harvesting may increase the utilization rate of helicopters and reduce the average helicopter unit cost. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting the cost and productivity of helicopter logging and to analyze the utilization of helicopter logging in Turkish forestry.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

A.E. Akay, H.H. Acar and J. Sessions, 2008. An Analysis of Utilizing Helicopter Logging in Turkish Forestry. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8: 3910-3916.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.3910.3916

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2008.3910.3916

INTRODUCTION

In Turkey, the application of mechanized harvesting is currently limited since harvesting machines are very expensive and highly correlated with the fuel prices (Akay et al., 2004). They are also undesirable due to negative effects of mechanization on the workforce. In Turkey, most of the harvesting operations are performed using animals and manpower while mechanized equipment (i.e., tractors) are employed in some areas for mainly winching logs. The percentages of using manpower, animals, mechanized equipment and skylines in the harvesting operations are 75, 15, 7 and 3%, respectively (Akay and Sessions, 2004).

In Turkish forestry, the trees have to be bucked into short lengths logs (3-4 m) since longer logs can not be handled easily by traditional harvesting methods. Also, the standards of the forest roads are low, which will not allow using large logging trucks to haul longer logs. Thus, producing short logs reduces the log values, which leads to significant reduction in the potential profits. To produce and transport longer logs, aerial harvesting methods such as cable logging and helicopter logging could be implemented, especially in productive forests located in steep mountainous regions of Turkey. Cable systems are not used very often by the logging contractors due to lack of experienced and skilled cable yarding operators. The General Directorate of Forestry (GDF) utilizes helicopters in firefighting activities; however, helicopters have not been used in harvesting operations. In Turkey, helicopter logging can be used in harvesting high quality logs and in extraction of mature trees in environmentally sensitive areas where road construction and logging operations are restricted. This study aims to identify the variable factors influencing the productivity and cost of helicopter logging and to present an overview of utilizing helicopter logging in Turkish forestry.

Helicopter harvesting is an aerial harvesting system whereby logs are removed vertically from the forest and flown to a roadside landing or drop zone (Chua, 2001). Commercial helicopter logging, also called as helilogging, dates back to early 1970`s in the Pacific Northwest of the USA and in Western Canada. Table 1 shows various helicopter models and their load capacities. Helicopter logging plays an important role in timber production by providing logging managers with advantages of applying environmentally friendly harvesting practices and ecologically based silvicultural treatments and harvesting from timber salvage sites and by enabling access to unreachable areas due to extreme terrain conditions or remoteness from the road network (Christian and Brackley, 2007).

Compared with ground-based logging methods, helilogging operation increases the woody biomass regrowth and minimizes the soil disturbance and sediment yield (Aust and Lea, 1992). Table 2 compares various harvesting systems. In order to develop a productive and cost effective helilogging system, the stages of the logging operation should be carefully planned and implemented considered various working conditions and different helicopter models.

The felling operations should be planned ahead of time and proper felling techniques should be implemented during the operation. Felling should be done prior to move in of the helicopter since the felling production may be much lower than the helilogging production due to hard working conditions (Stampfer et al., 2002). Directional felling should be performed. The trees should be bucked into suitable log sizes according to optimum payload capacity of the helicopter and logs selected for each trip should be marked clearly (Hartsough et al., 1986). The logs should be pre-bunched for lifting and any obstacles should be moved away from the area (Chua, 2001).

After felling and bucking, the logs are extracted by the helicopter. In helilogging, the logs are carried by a grapple or load-hook, which is positioned at the end of a lifting cable below the helicopter. In more recent helilogging operations, double load-hooks are utilized so that pilots can release some of the logs when the load exceeds the payload capacity (Krag, 1995).

Table 1: Scheduled payload capacities for some logging helicopters reported by various helilogging companies (Logging and Sawmilling Journal- Dec 2000/Jan 2001)

The grapple can be controlled electrically, hydraulically, or mechanically. The following factors should be considered during the lifting operation:

The length of the lifting cable might range from 75 to 100 m (Chua, 2001).
During each trip, the grapple or load-hook should target precisely the point where logs are prepared for lifting (i.e., well-experienced and trained pilots are required for helilogging) (Sloan et al., 1994)
If there is a logging crew on the ground, they should stay clear when helicopter is picking up the logs
After picking up the logs, the helicopter lifts the logs clear of the forest and then flies to the landing area (Stampfer et al., 2002)
Heavy logs should be extracted near the end of fuel cycle (i.e., weight of the helicopter is low) (Chua, 2001) and when the air temperature is coolest (air is dense).
In helilogging, the helicopter is usually flown by two pilots; one for flying the helicopter and monitoring the operation and other for controlling the instruments in the helicopter (Chua, 2001).

At the final stage of the helilogging, the logs are flown to the landing area and placed on the drop zone (Chua, 2001) (Fig. 1):

The landing areas should have a well organized drop zone with enough space to ensure an efficient and safe helilogging operation.
To perform economically, the location of the landing area should be determined by considering the optimum flying distance (e.g., flying distance should be within 2 km).
The pilots should gently place the logs on the ground to minimize log damage.
The landing area should be large enough to pile logs since helicopter logging has a very short cycle time.

Table 2: Comparisons of various harvesting systems (Far Eastern Aerostatic Center, Russia)

Fig. 1: Lifting (left) and landing (right) operations in helilogging (Ericson Air-Crane Inc., USA)

The number of logging crew members at the landing should be kept low to avoid accidents.

Timber volume per unit area, stem volume and optimum payload capacity are critical parameters that affect the productivity of helilogging (Krag, 1995). An experienced ground crew and pilot increase the productivity in helilogging (Hartsough et al., 1986; Sloan et al., 1994). Jackson and Morris (1986), in South Carolina, reported that the unit cost of helilogging (using Boeing Vertol07 II with the average cycle time of 2.57 min) under excellent weather and timber conditions was about $23 m-3 with production rate of 78.5 m3 h-1 and hourly cost of $1,781.

Sloan et al. (1994) studied helilogging in Virginia where they reported that the unit cost of helilogging (using KMAX with the average cycle time of 2.2-3.0 min) was about $82 m-3 with production rate of 21.0 m3 h-1 and hourly cost of $1,713. They reported that the productivity and cost of helilogging is mainly affected by the loading operation, flying distance and pilot experiences. In another study, Sloan and Sherar (1997) reported that the unit cost of helilogging (using KMAX) was about $60 m-3 with production rate of 37.2 m3 h-1 and hourly cost of $2,232. In their study, estimation of suitable payload sizes was the main factor affecting the productivity of the helilogging.

A study conducted by Stampfer et al. (2002) reported that the productivity of the helilogging (using KMAX) highly depended on average stem volume and flying distance. They also reported that predetermined felling directions and bunching the logs prior to lifting operation increased productivity. According to Stampfer et al. (2002), a well-experienced helicopter pilot resulted in a 63% increase in productivity of helilogging operation. Optimum payload is one of the major factors, which may be affected by silvicultural treatment (Wang et al., 2005). Various retention levels reflects the load per turn based on the site conditions (Lyons and McNeel, 2004).

Wang et al. (2004a, b) reported that helilogging (using Boeing Vertol-107 with the average cycle time of 3.29 min) was 6 and 11 times more expensive than grapple and cable skidders, respectively; but the production rate of helilogging operation was 1.5 to 2.8 times more than these ground-based methods. They found that the unit cost of helilogging was about $64 m-3 with production rate of 23.04 m3 h-1 and hourly cost of $1,479.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Turkey, the GDF uses helicopters in various forestry activities such as fire fighting, forest protection, wildlife management, shipping and other activities. The GDF owns USA-designed Eurocopter AS-355 F-2 Ecureuil II/Twin Star and Aerospatiale AS-365 Dauphin II” model helicopters mainly for monitoring, reconand picture taking (Fig. 2). The GDF utilizes Russian- designed Mil Mi-8M series helicopters for fire fighting activities (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2: AS-355 F-2 Ecureuil II (left) and AS-365 Dauphin II (right) model helicopters

Fig. 3: Mil Mi-17 Hip-H (left) and Mil Mi-8MTV-1 (right) model helicopters

The Mil Mi-17 Hip-H model helicopters, owned by the Military Police (Gendarme), are used during the fire season, based on a protocol between the GDF and the Gendarme. The GDF also rents a number of Mil Mi-8MTV-1 model helicopters for fire fighting activities.

Since Mil Mi-8MTV-1 series helicopters are not owned by the GDF and are utilized for only for fire fighting activities, they are not available for helilogging. The AS-355 F-2 Ecureuil II can not be employed in helilogging due to limited payload capabilities. Thus, AS-365 Dauphin II is the only helicopter model owned by the GDF which can be available for helilogging operations in Turkey. The hourly cost of renting the Mil Mi-8MTV-1 is about $3000. The option of renting additional helicopters specifically for helilogging was not considered for this study. Therefore, the analysis of utilizing helilogging was performed for the AS-365 Dauphin II model helicopter.

AS-365 dauphin II: The AS-365 Dauphin II (Fig. 4) is categorized as a medium twin engine helicopter with following specifications (Eurocopter, 2007):

With standard seat configurations, the AS-365 can carry 1 or 2 pilots and 8 passengers
The empty weight (including engine oil and fuel) and maximum take-off weight are approximately 2400 and 4300 kg, respectively
The maximum external cargo sling payload capacity is about 1600 kg
With maximum take-off weight, the recommended cruise speed and hourly fuel consumption at this speed is 269 km h-1 and 314 kg h-1, respectively
The maximum continuous power is about 600 kW (800 HP)
The helilogging operation with the AS-365 Dauphin II has some operating limitations such as maximum flight altitude of 4575 m, maximum temperature of 50°C and minimum temperature of -40°C.

Machine rate estimation: The unit cost of helilogging can be estimated by dividing the hourly equipment cost of the helicopter (machine rate) by the production rate. The machine rate is divided into three components; labor costs, ownership costs and operating costs. The hourly cost of labor is estimated as $150 h-1.

The ownership cost components include depreciation cost, interest cost and insurance, tax and storage costs of the equipment. The yearly depreciation cost is function of initial purchase price, salvage rate and economic life. The initial purchase price, salvage rate and economic life were estimated as $3.5 million, 25% and 16 years (i.e. considering 20000 h service life and 1250 flight h per year with 60% utilization rate).

Fig. 4: Dimensions of an AS-365 Dauphin II (Eurocopter, 2007)

The interest costs can be calculated by multiplying the interest rate (18%) by the average annual investment (Akay and Sessions, 2004).

The costs of insurance, taxes and storage are computed as a function of the initial purchase prices. The total rate of these three factors is estimated as 11.5%. The main operating cost components include maintenance and repair costs, fuel cost and lubricant cost. The maintenance and repair cost can be estimated as a percent of depreciation. Wang et al. (2005) suggested that the maintenance and repair rate was 100% of the depreciation of the helicopter. Fuel and lubricant costs can be computed based on hourly fuel consumption rate (314 kg h-1), weight of fuel per liter (0.84 kg L-1) and local unit prices.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Turkish forestry, the trees have to be bucked into short lengths logs (3-4 m) due to current harvesting methods and low road standards. Producing short logs significantly reduces the potential profits from the logs. However, longer logs can be produced if aerial harvesting methods such as helicopter logging can be implemented in productive forests with commercially important tree species. Helicopter logging can also be used in extraction of mature trees in environmentally sensitive areas where road construction and logging operations are restricted.

In this study, the analysis of helilogging was performed for the AS-365 Dauphin II model helicopter based on a hypothetical example. The hourly cost of the AS-365 Dauphin II helicopter was estimated as $1950 h-1 (Table 3) using the machine rate method. Fuel cost was the most important factor affecting the machine rate. The high purchase price increased the costs of interest, insurance, taxes and storage, value of the average annual investment, depreciation cost and maintenance and repair costs. The average annual investment and depreciation cost was greatly affected by the economic life of the helicopter. Interest, insurance, taxes and storage costs were the second highest cost component due to the high interest rate and taxes in Turkey.

By using the machine rate ($ h-1) and hourly production rate (m3 h-1), the unit cost ($ m-3) of helilogging can be computed. The production rate is a function of payload capacity and average cycle time.

Table 3: The hourly cost components of the helicopter

In a helilogging study by Wang et al. (2005), the average cycle was found to be as 3.29 min in which fly empty, prebunch, hook, fly loaded, release, unhook and delay/refuel times were 0.56, 1.04, 0.87, 0.57, 0.02, 0.22 and 3.00 min, respectively. This indicated that the loaded fly time is about 2% greater than the unloaded fly time in that study.

Based on cycle time data from Wang et al. (2005), a production rate was estimated for the AS-365 Dauphin II helicopter. For the flight distance of 2 km and average cruise speed of 269 km h-1, fly unloaded and fly loaded times were 0.89 and 0.91 min, respectively. The total time of other cycle time elements (i.e., prebunch, hook, release, unhook and delay/refuel times) obtained from Wang et al. (2005) were 2.16 min. Therefore, the total cycle time estimation was 3.96 min, including fly unloaded and fly loaded times.

With the average payload utilization rate of 60%, the production rate of the AS-365 Dauphin II with an average payload capacity of 1.6 m-3 (i.e., 1000 kg≈1 m3) was computed as 14.54 m3 h-1. This resulted in a unit cost of $134.11 m-3 for helilogging using the AS-365 Dauphin II helicopter. The unit cost estimate is high compared with helilogging studies reviewed in this paper due to the low production rate. However, this result may still generate an acceptable net profit in Turkey since the average unit price of the high quality and l onger logs can be over $200 m-3 based on the tree species, the regions and market demand. The lower payload capacity of the AS-365 Dauphin II played an important role in the unit cost of helilogging. Utilizing the full payload capacity of the helicopter would increase the production rate and lower the unit cost during a helilogging operation.

CONCLUSION

Applying helilogging in Turkish forestry could be economically viable and technically feasible based on the simple analysis used in this study. In some situations, helilogging can be the only option in implementing timber extraction in environmentally sensitive areas and in steep and difficult terrain in Turkey. Helilogging operations may also provide logging managers with the following advantages:

Reducing damage to residual trees and forest vegetation, especially during selection cutting systems in uneven aged mixed forests
Minimizing sediment yield to streams and protecting water resources by reducing forest road construction
Providing access to remote forested areas and difficult terrain
Maximizing logging productivity by providing a high production rate
Increasing the quality and price of the logs by allowing extraction of longer logs, which can not be transported otherwise due to low-standard forest roads in Turkey
Ensuring safer working environment for the loggers

In implementing helilogging, logging managers should also be aware of the following potential disadvantages:

Permitting logging operations in environmentally sensitive and steep areas
Involving high investment to utilize a helicopter and Increasing the unit cost of timber extraction operations
Requiring skilled, well-trained and experienced personnel (i.e., pilots and technicians) who might be foreign rather than domestic labor
Reducing road densities in the long run which may lead to an increase in the cost of forest management
Leaving large amount of low quality logs in the woods after extracting only high quality logs
REFERENCES
Akay, A.E. and J. Sessions, 2004. Identifying the factors influencing the cost of mechanized harvesting equipment. J. Sci. Eng., 7: 65-72.
Direct Link  |  

Akay, A.E., O. Erdas and J. Sessions, 2004. Determining productivity of mechanized harvesting machines. J. Applied Sci., 4: 100-105.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Aust, M.W. and A. Lea, 1992. Comparative effects of aerial and ground logging on soil properties in a tupelo-cypress wetland. For. Ecol. Manage., 50: 57-73.
Direct Link  |  

Christian, L.E. and A.M. Brackley, 2007. Helicopter logging productivity on harvesting operations in southeast alaska, using ecologically based silvicultural prescriptions. Western J. Applied For., 22: 142-147.
Direct Link  |  

Chua, K.H., 2001. Helicopter harvesting in the hill mixed dipterocarp forests of Sarawak. Applying Reduced Impact Logging to Advance Sustainable Forest Management. International Conference Proceedings, 26 February-1 March 2001, Kuching, Malaysia. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/AC805E/ac805e06.htm.

Eurocopter, 2007. AS 365 N3 Technical Data. EADS Company, pp: 70. http://www.eurocopter.com/ec130/TD_EC130B4.pdf.

Hartsough, B.R., M.B. Lambert and J.A. Miles, 1986. Simulating changes to helicopter logging operations. Trans. ASAE., 29: 1228-1231.

Jackson, B.D. and R.A. Morris, 1986. Helicopter logging of bald cypress in Southern Swamps. Southern J. Applied For., 10: 92-95.
Direct Link  |  

Krag, R.K., 1995. Operational Feasibility and Cost of Helicopter Logging on Steep Slopes. In: Proceeding IUFRO XX World Congress, Subject Group S3.06, Sessions, J. (Ed.). Forest Operations Under Mountainous Conditions. Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp: 54-72.

Lyons, C.K. and J. McNeel, 2004. Partial retention and helicopter turn volume. For. Prod. J., 54: 58-61.
Direct Link  |  

Sloan, H. and J. Sherar, 1997. Hurricane fran helicopter salvage case study. Proceeding of the 20th Annual Meeting of Council on Forest Engineering, July 28-31, 1997, Rapid City, SD., pp: 107-113.

Sloan, H., J. Tollenaere and Ch. Croff, 1994. Technology Advances in Helilogging: A Case Study of the K-MAX in Appalachian Hardwoods. In: Proceeding of the Meeting on Advanced Technology in Forest Operations: Applied Ecology in Action, Sessions, J. and L. Kellogg (Eds.). Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp: 237-246.

Stampfer, K., H. Gridling and R. Visser, 2002. Analyses of parameters affecting helicopter timber extraction. Int. J. For. Eng., 13: 61-68.
Direct Link  |  

Wang, J., C. Long and J. McNeel, 2004. Production and cost analysis of feller-buncher and grapple skidder in central Appalachian hardwood forests. For. Prod. J., 54: 159-167.
Direct Link  |  

Wang, J., C. Long, J. McNeel and J. Baumgras, 2004. Productivity and cost of manual felling and cable skidding in central Appalachian hardwood forests. For. Prod. J., 54: 45-51.
Direct Link  |  

Wang, J., S.T. Grushecky and J. McNeel, 2005. Production analysis of helicopter logging in West Virginia: A preliminary case study. For. Prod. J., 55: 71-76.
Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved