Submit Manuscript

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2004 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 663-668
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Competitiveness and the Trade of Livestock Products: A Comparative Study Between Turkey and its Neighbouring Countries

Mushtaq Ahmad Klasra and Halil Fidan

ABSTRACT

This study aims at examining the international competitiveness of Turkish exports in comparison to its neighboring countries in the wake of globalize trend. Revealed Comparative Advantage Index of each country remained mixed but with varying degrees with respect to each commodity group. Ukraine and Romania appeared significantly competitive in terms of their export market share both in the world and in the neighboring countries markets. Being high wage economy relative to its neighboring countries, Turkey could increase marginally its export market share only in the markets of its neighboring countries during 2001.
PDF References Citation

Search

REFERENCES

  1. Balassa, B., 1965. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manchester School Econ. Social Stud., 33: 92-123.
  2. Montobbio, F., 2003. Sectoral patterns of technological activity and export share dynamics. Cambridge J. Econ., 27: 523-545.
  3. Soete, L.L.G., 1981. A general test of technological gap trade theory. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch., 117: 638-660.
  4. Mangnier, A. and J. Toujas-Berante, 1994. Technology and Trade:Empirical evidence for the major five industrial Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch., 130: 499-520.
  5. Ingco, M.D., 1995. Agricultural Trade Liberalization in the Uruguay Round One Step Forward One Step Back. The World Bank, Washington DC.
  6. Lall, S., 1995. The Creation of Comparative Advantage the Role of Industrial Policy. In: Trade Technology and International Competitiveness, Irfan ul Haque (Ed.). Economic Development Institute, World Bank, Washington DC.
  7. Upton, M., 2001. Trade in Livestock and Livestock Products International Regulation and Role for Economic Development. FAO, Italy.
  8. Holm, K., 1999. Harmonized system amendmentsbcurrent and future meeting of the expert group on international economic and social classifications. Nov. 15-17, New York, ESA/STAT/AC.75/6.
  9. Yurdakul, O. and A. Koc, 1995. Gida urunleri pazarlamasi CUZF genel yayin No. 121. Ders Kitabi Yayin No. 34, Adana.

Search

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *