• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Applied Sciences
  2. Vol 1 (4), 2001
  3. 428-431
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2001 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 428-431
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2001.428.431
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

The Energy-Income Relationship in Asian-Pacific Countries

Jan Bentzen

ABSTRACT


During the last decades energy consumption has increased relatively much in Asian countries as some of these countries have been fast growing economics. Measuring energy intensity as the relationship between primary energy consumption and GDP at purchasing power parities reveals that there does not seem to be significant differences between less developed Asian countries and the Industrialized countries in the region. Alternatively, a comparison of per capita energy consumption shows big differences between Asian countries, when testing for convergence in energy consumption – measured either in relation to GDP or as per capita consumption – the traditional tests β- convergence and σ-convergence) reveal some positive evidence whereas a more restrictive time series test of convergence (stochastic convergence) exhibits evidence in favour of predominantly country-specific trajectories concerning energy intensities.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

Jan Bentzen, 2001. The Energy-Income Relationship in Asian-Pacific Countries. Journal of Applied Sciences, 1: 428-431.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2001.428.431

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2001.428.431

Search


REFERENCES


  1. Asafu-Adjaye, J., 2000. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: Time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Econ., 22: 615-625.
    Direct Link

  2. Bernard, A.B. and S.N. Durlauf, 1991. Convergence of international output movements. NBER Working Paper No. 3717. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/3717.html.

  3. Bernard, A.B. and S.N. Durlauf, 1995. Convergence in international output. J. Applied Econ., 10: 97-108.
    Direct Link

  4. Bernard, A.B. and S.N. Durlauf, 1996. Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. J. Econ., 71: 161-173.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Camarero, M., V. Esteve and C. Tamarit, 2000. Price convergence of peripheral European countries on the way to the EMU: A time series approach. Empirical Econ., 25: 149-168.
    Direct Link

  6. Choe, C. and I.A. Moosa, 1997. Demand for oil by developing countries. OPEC Rev., 21: 295-307.
    Direct Link

  7. Dahl, C., 1993. A survey of oil demand elasticities for developing countries. OPEC Rev., 17: 399-419.

  8. Dahl, C.K., 2001. Estimating oil products demand in Indonesia using a cointegrating error-correction model. OPEC Rev., 25: 1-25.
    Direct Link

  9. Engsted, T. and J. Bentzen, 1997. Dynamic modelling of energy demand. OPEC Rev., 21: 261-293.

  10. Greasley, D. and L. Oxley, 1997. Time-series based tests of the convergence hypothesis: Some positive results. Econ. Lett., 56: 143-147.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Gurer, N. and L. Oxley, 1997. Factors affecting energy-related CO2 emissions: Past levels and present trends. OPEC Rev., 21: 309-350.
    Direct Link

  12. Gurer, N. and J. Ban, 1998. Electricity demand and intensity: A perspective on the major influencing factors. OPEC Rev., 22: 301-335.

  13. Harris, R.I.D. and M. Trainor, 1999. Manufacturing industries in Northern Ireland and Great Britain: Was there convergence during the 1949-92 period. Applied Econ., 31: 1573-1580.
    Direct Link

  14. Li, Q. and D. Papell, 1999. Convergence of international output: Time series evidence for 16 OECD countries. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance, 8: 267-280.
    CrossRef

  15. Mackinnon, J.G., 1991. Critical Values for Cointegence of Tests. In: Long-run Economic Relationships, Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  16. Moosa, I.M., 1998. Long-run and short-run demand for oil by developing contries: An empirical analysis. OPEC Rev., 22: 1-12.
    Direct Link

  17. Nag, B. and J. Parikh, 2000. Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commerical energy use in India. Energy Econ., 22: 441-461.
    CrossRef

  18. Paga, E. and N. Gurer, 1996. Reassiessing energy intensities: A quest for new realism. OPEC Rev., 20: 47-86.

  19. Perron, P., 1989. The great crash, the oil shock and the unit root hypothesis. Economic, 57: 1361-1401.
    Direct Link

  20. Perron, P., 1997. Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. J. Econometrics, 80: 355-385.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. The Classical Approch to Convergence Analysis. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK., pp: 37.
    Direct Link

Search


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved