Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

The Effect of Dynamic Exponential Decay Factor on Volatility and VaR



Marius Botha , Gary van Vuuren and Paul Styger
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Value at Risk models heavily on the accuracy of price volatility estimates to measure capital that could potentially be lsot over given time horizons. Volatility measured by equally weighting instruments price returns in often erroneous, but employing exponential envelope weighting largely circumvents the inaccuracies. The steepness of the envelope applied to returns depends upon a single number . assumed unique and constant in any given market. This paper examines the historical evolution of for South African-specific data and shows it it vary consntatly and significantly. The effects of these changes on volatility, correlation and ultimately, VaR, are also examined.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Marius Botha , Gary van Vuuren and Paul Styger , 2001. The Effect of Dynamic Exponential Decay Factor on Volatility and VaR. Journal of Applied Sciences, 1: 24-32.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2001.24.32

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2001.24.32

REFERENCES
1:  Alexander, C., 1997. Volatility and Correlation Forecasting. In: The Handbook of Risk Management and Analysis, Alexander, C. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

2:  Botha, M., 2000. Old mutual asset mangers. Internal Report No. 23. Cape Town, Old Mutual, pp: 4-9

3:  Botha, M. and G.W. van Vuuren, 1999. The silence of the lambdas. Risk Special Rep., 12: 22-24.

4:  Christofferson, P. and F. Diebold, 1997. How Relevant is Volatility Forecasting for Financial Risk Management. Wharton Financial Institutions Center, University of Pennsylvania, UK.

5:  Diebold, F., A. Hickman, A. Inoue and T. Schuermann, 1998. Scale models. Risk, 11: 104-107.

6:  Dowd, K., 1998. Beyond Value at Risk. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

7:  Drost, F.C. and T.E. Nijman, 1993. Temporal aggregation of GARCH processes. Econometrica, 61: 909-927.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Hull, J.C., 1997. Options, Futures and other Derivates. 3rd Edn., Prentice Hall International Inc., USA.

9:  Picoult, E., 1998. Calculating Value at Risk with Monte Calo Simulation. In: Monte Carlo: Methodologies and Applications for Pricing and Risk Management, Dupire, B. (Ed.). Bookcraft Books Inc., New York, pp: 209-230.

10:  Reed, N., 1996. Variations on a theme. Value Risk, 6: 2-4.

11:  Shimko, D., 1996. VaR for corporates. Risk, 9: 34-35.

12:  Shimko, C. and L. Minton, 1996. Understanding various ways to calculate VaR. Risk, 9: 54-56.

13:  Shimko, C. and L. Minton, 1996. The deba on the use of VaR. Risk, 9: 58-60.

14:  Wei, W.W.S., 1989. Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Method. Addisin Wesley, California.

15:  Zangari, P., 1996. An imporved methodology for measuring VaR. Risk Metrics Monitor, 2: 7-25.

16:  Zangari, P., 1997. Catering for an event. Risk, 10: 34-36.

17:  Shimko, D., 1997. Accentute the positives. Paul-Choudhury, S. (Ed.). Value at Risk for End-Users, Risk Special Supplement, March 10-14.

18:  Leong, N., 1996. The right approch. Cooper G. (Ed.). Valueat Risk: A Risk Special Supplement, June 9-14.

19:  Morgan, J.P., 1996. RiskMetricsTM Technical Document. 4th Edn., Morgan Guaranty Trust Co., New York.

20:  Basle Committee, 1996. Overview of the amendment of the capital accord to incorporate market risk. Basle Committee on Banking Supervision.

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved