Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Review Article
 

Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges



M.S. Javadi, S. Habib and M.A. Hannan
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Inter-Vehicle Communication (IVC) has presented a promising role in vehicular technology to fulfill a variety of applications to improve safety and traffic flow. This article outlines IVC taxonomy, applications and challenges. Current trends of vehicular communication technologies are explained including classification, functions, applications, missions, requirements, advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Many IVC applications have been investigated from the literature to provide safe, comfortable and reliable vehicular operations. In this article, the recent research trends and development activities in inter-vehicle communications have been critically reviewed, emphasizing the areas where further work is needed. It is found that the continuous developing technology will certainly push the future market of high-quality IVC systems. However, the issues and challenges of the existing IVC system such as data aggregation, distribution, hardware/software compatibility, nodes density, security, mobility, market, etc. are highlighted to future system development. Thus, this study will lead the increasing need to develop new and improved IVC technology for many applications.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

M.S. Javadi, S. Habib and M.A. Hannan, 2013. Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges. Information Technology Journal, 12: 243-250.

DOI: 10.3923/itj.2013.243.250

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=itj.2013.243.250
 
Received: July 04, 2012; Accepted: October 07, 2012; Published: November 28, 2012



INTRODUCTION

Road transport as the main mode of transportation is one the high priority research areas. Safety and economic concerns made this topic as the target of high technology inventions (Willke et al., 2009). The mission is to make the traveling time as safe, short and comfortable as possible. Inter-Vehicle Communication (IVC) systems among the latest concepts have this potential to fulfill safety concerns and also improve traffic flow (Popescu-Zeletin et al., 2010).

IVC consider on exchanging data between vehicles, therefore equipped vehicles have the advantage of receiving other vehicles’ sensors data ahead of time. There is a vast types of applications based on IVC, while it may cover up a larger class, by using road-side infrastructures (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). In this article vehicular communication applications, requirement and challenges are explained with emphasizing on IVC systems. Vehicular communication applications have been classified based on their requirement and missions, into two main categories; vehicle information services and vehicle control commands.

The first category is about transferring information for the use of drivers and passengers. The second category considers commands which apply directly to the vehicle’s actuators. The aim of these applications is to increase safety and information access of vehicle occupant and also make traveling time more pleasant and comfortable. Communication among vehicles can be realized by different methods based on equipment and application (Willke et al., 2009; Popescu-Zeletin et al., 2010). As it is shown in Fig. 1, vehicular communication systems have been categorized in three types of systems: Inter-Vehicle Communication (IVC), Land to Vehicle Communication (LVC) and Hybrid Vehicular Communication (HVC) (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008).

Inter-Vehicle Communication (IVC) systems exchange data from one vehicle to another by using on-board transceiver systems, without any need to road-side infrastructure.

Image for - Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges
Fig. 1: Classification of vehicle communication systems

Another type is Land to Vehicle Communication (LVC) which relies on road-side infrastructure to broadcast signals among vehicles (Palazzi et al., 2012). In comparison with IVC, LVC implementation is more expensive since it needs infrastructure in addition to on-board equipment. To extend the transmission range Hybrid Vehicular Communication (HVC) systems is proposed. In this type even out of range vehicles can communicate with specific road-side plant by using other nearer vehicles as routers. However sparse presence of vehicles may cause reduction in network connectivity (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). In this study we mainly focused on IVC applications, since they just rely on on-board equipment.

INTER-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS

The vast class of IVC applications can make driving safer and more comfortable for vehicle occupants (Popescu-Zeletin et al., 2010; Palazzi et al., 2012). IVC services can be achieved through different methods by exchanging data between vehicles and sometimes through land-based infrastructures. Figure. 2 shows classification of vehicular communication application. It helps us to focus on specific equipment to fulfill services and solve diverse problems (Reichardt et al., 2002; Yin et al., 2004).

Vehicle information services: Information services consider on broadcasting messages through the vehicular network or land-based plants for the use of drivers to make traveling safer and more efficient (Biswas et al., 2006; Lee and Gerla, 2010; Roccetti et al., 2011). Forwarded information will help the driver to get better decisions in dealing with hazardous situations or will assist them to experience an enhanced traveling. Traffic management centers can also use these collected data to monitor and optimize traffic flow on the roads (Reichardt et al., 2002).

Image for - Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges
Fig. 2: Classification of vehicular communication applications

Alerts and warnings: Alerts and warnings are information about a dangerous or unpleasant event in the near future so drivers can try to avoid it based on their prior awareness (Willke et al., 2009; Hannan et al., 2006; Yin et al., 2004). There are several kinds of warnings such as collision, abnormal movement in neighborhood, accident on the road, sharp curve, and dangerous road surface (Caliskan et al., 2006). Distance between source and receiver will cause in latency which can raise a problem of late warning delivery. These applications can reduce significantly the number of injuries and fatalities on the road since many accidents can be avoided by giving knowledge of up-coming situation (Hannan et al., 2010a).

For example spreading emergency message via vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET) to other vehicles in the relevant area is based on analyzing motion state parameters of each vehicle to recognize some failures such as accidents and mechanical breakdown. Vehicles assumed to be equipped with Global Positioning System (GPS) and short-range communication systems. The CARTALK 2000 project also presented a similar method to distribute dangerous situation alerts among near vehicles. Latency in this kind of service should be as low as 40 ms and message repetition rate as high as 50 Hz (Reichardt et al., 2002).

Collision warning systems has this potential to prevent a quite large number of traffic accidents (Yin et al., 2004). Once an accident-like situation happened for a vehicle, such as deploying vehicle’s airbag or dramatic change in vehicle’s speed, it can broadcast this warning message to all other approaching vehicles. Intermediate relays could transmit the signal further than its transmission range (Domingo-Ferrer and Wu, 2009). Therefore the drivers will be informed about the up-coming situation and they can make better decision. Also vehicles coming through road junctions may end up in crashes. If vehicles involved in this situation be equipped with on-board communication system, it can prevent this kind of accidents as well. Also specific real-time constraints have considered for safety alerts (Zheng et al., 2004). Drivers should receive alerts in an appropriate time before they encounter the event so the information would be useful (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008; Hannan et al., 2010b; Xu et al., 2003).

There are a number of technologies to realize danger warning applications. For short range wireless communication technologies, ZigBee (IEEE 802.15.4 standard) and UWB (Ultra-wideband) (IEEE 802.15.3a standard) are used to achieve sensor and advanced control network inside the car where UWB bit rate is extremely high about 1000 Mb sec-1 (Tsai et al., 2007; Richardson et al., 2006). WAVE (Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments) (IEEE 1609 standard) is a medium range technology to cover up 1 km that has efficient broadcasting with low latency for local danger warnings (Campolo et al., 2011).

Assistance services: This class of applications considers more on information access and comfortable traveling for the vehicle occupants. It consists in data communication among vehicles and land-based infrastructures (Sugiura and Dermawan, 2005). These services require a low communication overhead and high information ratio. In this class IVC systems provide applications for exchanging data between vehicles in the area such as voice and instant messages or between police officers (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). Nowadays as many cars are equipped with GPS and on-board transceiver systems, useful collected data can be recorded in their databases. This information includes map update, available parking lots, nearest petroleum stations, hotels and even local advertisement and promotions (Domingo-Ferrer and Wu, 2009).

LVC can expand the assistance services to the larger class of applications and some cases as the initial feature of IVC systems. Internet is an essential need enables a variety of applications such as email, web browsing, digital maps, finding places and routs on the map, getting latest news, downloading music and video, etc can be realized through LVC (Popescu-Zeletin et al., 2010; Biswas et al., 2006; Namboodiri et al., 2004). Automatic parking and toll payment without time wasting also can be achieved in this class for easy driving (Bickel, 2006; Au et al., 2006). Vehicles can communicate with repair centers to diagnose and keep the record of maintenance (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). Complicated protocols can be applied since there is sufficient capacity of power supply and processing in vehicles.

Bluetooth and UWB are technologies used for vehicles occupants to exchange data among their devices (Tsai et al., 2007; Sugiura and Dermawan, 2005). WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) (IEEE 802.16 standard) as a long range technology (5 km) provides internet access, email, etc (Chien et al., 2009). Cellular technologies such as 3G, LTE, UMTS, HSPA also can realize assistance services (Papadimitratos et al., 2009). WiMAX and cellular technologies got a bit rate up to 100 Mb sec-1 which is enough to fulfill purposes of this class.

Traffic optimization: Traffic congestion is an unpleasant experience in big cities due to the growing number of vehicles on the road (Nadeem et al., 2004). The main purpose of this class is to improve traffic flow and traveling time by giving drivers information of roads ahead to choose the most suitable one. It can primarily reduce congestion and fuel consumption (Domingo-Ferrer and Wu, 2009).

Motion status of each vehicle is a source of traffic condition that sent to the relevant vehicular network to inform approaching drivers. Transportation centers can also collect and analyze this data to help other drivers with the specific destination or emergency vehicles, to select the most appropriate routs (Roccetti et al., 2011). Under construction zones and accident spots can be broadcasted to the vehicular network to avoid traffic jam. Intelligent traffic lights set their timing based on the collected data to optimize the traffic flow. Authorities should evaluate this information to come up with new traffic plan for the future road maps.

Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11n standard), DSRC (Dedicated Short-Range Communications) (IEEE 802.11p standard), WAVE (IEEE 1609 standard) are medium range technologies for communication between vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to land infrastructures. Traffic information can be exchanged through these networks with the range up to 1 km (Campolo et al., 2011; Harri et al., 2009; Hassan et al., 2011). Cellular technologies and WiMAX can be used to expand the range of network up to 15 km.

Vehicle control commands: In this kind of vehicular communication service, exchanging signals are used to control and regulate vehicles motion status by commanding to vehicles actuators directly. As explained in details, vehicle control commands gradually improve safety, traffic flow and consequently it reduces fuel consumption and traveling time (Rajamani and Shladover, 2001).

Individual commands: Individual commands include applications that regulate the speed, direction or state of the vehicle based on neighborhood receiving signals applied on actuators such as brake pedal and steering wheel. It avoids collisions or reduces the damage by taking action in early stages. The short interaction between vehicles requires this class to be strictly real-time (Hannan et al., 2008).

Aircrafts adopted the similar approach to detect and avoid crashes. Collected data from other aircrafts have been used to evaluate the situation and if the collision is inevitable, it prepares the aircraft for collision. PathProx is an example of this application which broadcast the information among in range aircrafts (Cassell, 2005). It calculates the time of collision based on path estimation, and then preprogrammed rules of the road that guide the pilot to resolve the conflict. Vehicles can adopt a similar system to prevent accidents or if it is unavoidable, it activates safety features to reduce the damage (Hannan et al., 2011; Hussain et al., 2006).

At intersection each vehicle can broadcast its location and motion status to the network and the reaching time is estimated. Therefore drivers would be aware of other vehicles presence and if it is needed, the actuators (e.g. brake pedal) would be employed to protect the driver. Rear-end collisions are also avoidable with the same method by informing and activating the approaching vehicles actuators in the case of sudden speed reduction of the leading car (Liu and Ozguner, 2003). IVC systems also provide navigation for autonomous vehicle based on interpreting collected neighborhood data and commanding the actuators to stabilize its movement (Javadi et al., 2012).

In this class of applications DSRC (802.11p standard) and WAVE (IEEE 1609 standard) are technologies to get neighborhood data and apply them to actuators. The advantage of WAVE is having efficient broadcasting with low latency which is essential in this class. DSRC also is useful however low penetration rate should be considered (Campolo et al., 2011; Hassan et al., 2011).

Group commands: Group commands applications plan for the group of vehicles with the same traveling path or destination to drive more efficiently. It regulates their motion parameters by establishing partnership to each other even for several hours (Rajamani and Shladover, 2001). This includes also speed management, improving traffic flow and coordinating at intersections. Low latency is an essential requirement to fulfill this type of vehicular service. Group commands are divided into three categories; individual regulation, leader-based regulation and virtual leader-based regulation.

Individual regulation optimize the traveling path for group of vehicles which are communicating together, they adjust their motion parameters in response to the surrounding neighborhood. It assists the driver to merge the highway or coordinate at intersections. Among different computed plans within the group, one would be selected to achieve minimum traveling time (Clark et al., 2003). It also improves the traffic flow and may reduce collision rate by pre-calculating the delays and resolving the deadlocks. Right-based intersection accidents can be prevented using this technology. Unlike the later class which prevents collisions just before happening, it manages a group of vehicles to coordinate with each other safely far before the meeting point.

In leader-based regulation, one vehicle provides motion control commands to other vehicles in the group. Each vehicle regulates its course of action based on receiving commands and sensor collected data (Seiler et al., 2004). Within the platoon vehicles stabilize the minimum distance from leading and preceding ones. This enhances the flow of vehicles on highways and also the fuel consumption. These motion commands should be real-time and synchronized to gain stability in the platoon. The leading vehicle should manage different scenarios including joining or leaving vehicles and platoon maneuvers (Halle et al., 2004). In order to achieve reliable performance transmission delivery ratio has to be high within the group (Li and Wang, 2006).

If the motion control commands are receiving from a virtual or distributed model as a leader vehicle then this type would be virtual leader-based regulation. As the approach used to control the behavior of robots and airplanes in group, the distributed architecture will cover up a large number of vehicles as a group (Moreau, 2003). DSRC (802.11p standard) and WAVE (IEEE 1609 standard) can be used for medium range communication and cellular technologies and WiMAX (IEEE 802.16 standard) for long range to realize group commands services. High bit rate and low latency are advantages of these technologies, especially LTE which is a new standard for wireless communication of high-speed data transferring (Chien et al., 2009; Papadimitratos et al., 2009; Hassan et al., 2011).

A summary of IVC applications, challenges and requirements is presented in Table 1.

CURRENT TRENDS AND CHALLENGES

Development in sensors, processing and electronic devices along with advanced codes and protocols opened new horizons upon car industry all over the globe. Transceiver equipments on vehicles with communication protocols got this potential to achieve a vast class of applications. A summary of applications for vehicular communication systems is presented in Table 2. However inter-vehicle communication brought strong promises in improving road travelling efficiency, it is still facing number of difficulties on its way. The most crucial challenges of vehicular communication applications are as follows.

Data filtering and aggregation: The main mission of IVC systems is exchanging data between vehicles which are equipped with on-board sensors and transceiver systems. Since each vehicle provides individual view of events, an event differentiation block is required to filter and aggregate the input data to reduce the amount of transmitted data.

Table 1: Summary of IVC applications, challenges and technical requirement
Image for - Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges

Table 2: Summary of applications for vehicular communication systems
Image for - Survey on Inter-Vehicle Communication Applications: Current Trends and Challenges

Fast and proper distribution: Fast and secure distribution of event sensed data is an important factor to fulfill IV applications. In this stage it is necessary to identify neighbor cars to forward the information just to the interested ones. Existing internet transport protocols TCP and UDP showed poor performance in IVC systems (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). Vehicular Transport Protocol (VTP) and Mobile Control Transport Protocol (MCTP) are also proposed (Moreau, 2003). All these transport protocols need to be developed for IVC applications that require multicasting.

Hardware/software compatibility: Nowadays only few cars are equipped to IVC systems. The growing rate of equipped cars would be slow due to the long lifetime of existing cars. This will raise number of challenges; first of all the applications should be satisfying enough for consumers to buy this technology. Second hardware/software strategies need to be compatible with the network growth and also adaptive to future security, performing and safety considerations.

Nodes density: Even if all cars are equipped, the number of cars within a relevant area is another issue. Since IVC systems are based on car to car communication, sparse and dense presence of cars will cause different penetration and data transfer rate, therefore IVC systems have to be flexible in these situations.

Data security: Safety of IVC systems is the highest priority since it deals with human life. Any malfunction in IVC system may cause a threat to involved people. Besides, to avoid any possible system manipulation, high security protocols for IVC systems should be considered as well. In addition privacy of users needs to be protected from any unauthorized access. An example is a proposed architecture for security in communication, called Communications Architecture for Reliable Adaptive Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (CARAVAN). The goal is to develop protocols that protect network from possible threats (Bechler et al., 2005).

Distributing range: Fully distributed protocols as an essential issue in IVC systems highly have to be considered. Transferring data over a single hop from each vehicle to another in the vicinity is suggested to be every 300 msec sec in 10 sec travel time (Blum and Eskandarian, 2006). Therefore the broadcast range is between 10-300 m. In the case of emergency messages the range of broadcast has to be wider to cover up all the relevant area. Existing physical channel for prototype systems mostly based on IEEE 802.11b (2.4 GHz ISM band) (Raya and Hubaux, 2005) and IEEE 802.11a (5.8 GHz ISM band) (Hui and Mohapatra, 2005).

Relative speed: Due to the high relative speed of the nodes, the duration of communication connection between nodes might be less than a second. It implies data transferring time to be as short as possible. These network protocols should be compatible with all applications. It is shown that DSRC just delivers 50% of data packages in single hop experiments.

DISCUSSION

This paper investigated a detail survey on the inter-vehicle communication technologies, applications and the issues that are being facing problems. Different communication technologies with different specifications and applications are explained (Papadimitratos et al., 2009; Willke et al., 2009). Comprehensive inter-vehicle communication applications such as alerts and warnings, driver assistance, traffic optimization and control commands are discussed for safe, efficient and comfortable driving in realistic operating environments (Popescu-Zeletin et al., 2010). In comparison with other surveys, this study covers larger class of applications, along with its trends and challenges (Sichitiu and Kihl, 2008). Raya and Hubaux (2005) also did a survey on inter-vehicle communication systems, yet it is not focused on the required technologies to realize the applications (Raya and Hubaux, 2005). Zheng et al. (2004) also presented a review on inter-vehicle communication issues which explained warning systems without investigating on different types of applications and required technologies. This survey investigated and observed that the main issues and challenges of the existing inter-vehicle communication systems are data filtering and aggregation, distribution, hardware/software compatibility, nodes density, security, privacy, mobility, market, respectively. Hence, right technologies, efficient networks and suitable protocols are very important to achieve an effective inter-vehicle communication towards safety, comfort, capacity, reliability and convenience as well as lowering the traditional limitations. This study explained the existing inter-vehicle communication systems, their technologies, applications, challenges and problems in aiming to develop efficient low-cost and reliable future IVC systems. Thus, to achieve the aforesaid aims, this survey may lead as a starting point for increasing need to develop new and improved inter-vehicle communication systems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This project was supported by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia under the grants number: UKM-GGPM-ICT-107-2010.

REFERENCES

1:  Au, M.H., Q. Wu, W. Susilo and Y. Mu, 2006. Compact e-cash from bounded accumulator. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., 4377: 178-195.
CrossRef  |  

2:  Bechler, M., S. Jaap and L. Wolf, 2005. An optimized TCP for internet access of vehicular Ad hoc networks. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., 3462: 869-880.
CrossRef  |  

3:  Bickel, G.S., 2006. Inter/intra vehicle wireless communication. Reports on Recent Advances in Networking. http://www7.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~dulz/fkom/06/Material/1/Inter-Intra-Vehicle%20Wireless%20Communication.pdf.

4:  Biswas, S., R. Tatchikou and F. Dion, 2006. Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety. IEEE Commun. Magazine, 44: 74-82.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Blum, J. and A. Eskandarian, 2006. Fast, robust message forwarding for inter-vehicle communication networks. Proceedings of the Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, September 17-20 2006, Toronto, Ont., pp: 1418-1423
CrossRef  |  

6:  Caliskan, M., D. Graupner and M. Mauve, 2006. Decentralized discovery of free parking places. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, September 29-29, 2006, Los Angeles, CA, USA., pp: 30-39
CrossRef  |  

7:  Campolo, C., A. Vinel, A. Molinaro and Y. Koucheryavy, 2011. Modeling broadcasting in IEEE 802.11p/WAVE vehicular networks. IEEE Commun. Lett., 15: 199-201.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Cassell, R., 2005. Development of the runway incursion advisory and alerting system (RIAAS). NASA, Contractor Report, CR-2005-213759.

9:  Chien, M.C., Y.L. Chen, M.C. Wei and C.L. Kun, 2009. A feasibility study on vehicle-to-infrastructure communication: WiFi vs. WiMAX. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Data Management: Systems, Services and Middleware, May 18-21, 2009, Taipei, Taiwan, pp: 397-398

10:  Clark, C.M., S. Rock and J. Latombe, 2003. Motion planning for multiple mobile robots using dynamic networks. IEEE International Conference on Robotics Automation, September 14-19, 2003, Taipei, Taiwan, pp: 4222-4227

11:  Domingo-Ferrer, J. and Q. Wu, 2009. Safety and Privacy in Vehicular Communications. In: Privacy in Location-Based Applications Research Issues and Emerging Trends, Bettini, C., S. Jajodia, P. Samarati and X.S. Wang (Eds.). Vol. 5599, LNCS, Springer, Verlag Berlin, Heidelgerg, Germany, pp: 173-189

12:  Halle, S., J. Laumonier and B. Chaib-Draa, 2004. A decentralized approach to collaborative driving coordination. Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, October 3-6, 2004, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 453-458
CrossRef  |  

13:  Hannan, M.A., A. Hussain and S.A. Samad, 2010. System Interface for an Integrated Intelligent Safety System (ISS) for vehicle applications. Sensors, 10: 1141-1153.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Hannan, M.A., A. Hussain and S.A. Samad, 2011. Sensing systems and algorithms for airbag deployment decision. IEEE Sensors J., 11: 888-890.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Hannan, M.A., A. Hussain, A. Mohamed and S.A. Samad, 2008. Development of an embedded vehicle safety system for frontal crash detection. Int. J. Crashworthiness, 13: 579-587.
Direct Link  |  

16:  Hannan, M.A., A. Hussain, A. Mohamed, S.A. Samad and D.A. Wahab, 2010. Decision fusion of a multi-sensing embedded system for occupant safety measures. Int. J. Automot. Technol., 11: 57-65.

17:  Hannan, M.A., A. Hussain, S.A. Samad, A. Mohamed, D.A. Wahab and K.A.M. Ihsan, 2006. Development of an intelligent safety system for occupant detection, classification and position. Int. J. Automot.Technol., 7: 827-832.

18:  Harri, J., F. Filali and C. Bonnet, 2009. Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, 11: 19-41.
CrossRef  |  

19:  Hassan, M.I., H.L. Vu and T. Sakurai, 2011. Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol for DSRC safety applications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60: 3882-3896.

20:  Hui, F.W. and P. Mohapatra, 2005. Experimental characterization of multi-hop communications in vehicular Adhoc network. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks, (VANET '05), ACM New York, pp: 85-86
CrossRef  |  

21:  Hussain, A., M.A. Hannan, A. Mohamed, H. Sanusi and K.A.M. Ihsan, 2006. Vehicle crash analysis for airbag deployment decision. Int. J. Autom. Technol., 7: 179-185.
Direct Link  |  

22:  Javadi, M.S., M.A. Hannan, S.A. Samad and A. Hussain, 2012. A robust vision-based lane boundaries detection approach for intelligent vehicles. Inform. Technol. J., 11: 1184-1192.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Lee, U. and M. Gerla, 2010. A survey of urban vehicular sensing platforms. Comput. Networks, 54: 527-544.
CrossRef  |  

24:  Li, L. and F.Y. Wang, 2006. Cooperative driving at blind crossings using inter-vehicle communication. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 55: 1712-1724.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

25:  Liu, Y. and U. Ozguner, 2003. Effect of inter-vehicle communication on rear-end collision avoidance. Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, June 9-11, 2003, USA -
CrossRef  |  

26:  Moreau, L., 2003. Leaderless coordination via bidirectional and unidirectional time-dependent communication. Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Volume 3, December 9-12, 2003, Maui, Hawaii, USA., pp: 3070-3075
CrossRef  |  

27:  Nadeem, T., S. Dashtinezhad, C. Liao and L. Iftod, 2004. Traffic view: Traffic data dissemination using car-to-car communication. ACM Mobile Comput. Commun. Rev., 8: 6-9.
Direct Link  |  

28:  Namboodiri, V., M. Agarwal and L. Gao, 2004. A study on the feasibility of mobile gateways for vehicular ad-hoc networks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, October 1, 2004, Philadelphia, USA., pp: 66-75

29:  Palazzi, C.E., F. Pezzoni and P.M. Ruiz, 2012. Delay-bounded data gathering in urban vehicular sensor networks. Pervasive Mobile Comput., 8: 180-193.
CrossRef  |  

30:  Papadimitratos, P., A. La Fortelle, K. Evenssen, R. Brignolo and S. Cosenza, 2009. Vehicular communication systems: Enabling technologies, applications, and future outlook on intelligent transportation. IEEE Comm. Magazine, 47: 84-95.
CrossRef  |  

31:  Popescu-Zeletin, R., I. Radusch and M.A. Rigani, 2010. Vehicular-2-X Communication: State-of-the-Art and Research in Mobile Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. Springer, USA., pp: 5-38

32:  Rajamani, R. and S. Shladover, 2001. An experimental comparative study of autonomous and co-operative vehicle-follower control systems. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 9: 15-31.
CrossRef  |  

33:  Raya, M. and J.P. Hubaux, 2005. The security of vehicular ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks, November 7, 2005, ACM Press, Alexandria, VA., USA., pp: 11-21
CrossRef  |  

34:  Reichardt, D., M. Miglietta, L. Moretti, P. Morsink and W. Schulz, 2002. CarTALK 2000: Safe and comfortable driving based upon inter-vehicle-communication. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, Volume 2, June 17-21, 2002, Germany, pp: 545-550
CrossRef  |  

35:  Richardson, P.C., W. Xiang and W. Stark, 2006. Modeling of ultra-wideband channels within vehicles. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 24: 906-912.
CrossRef  |  

36:  Roccetti, M., G. Marfia and C.E. Palazzi, 2011. Entertainment beyond divertissement: Using computer games for city roads accessibility. ACM Comput. Entertainment, Vol. 9.
Direct Link  |  

37:  Seiler, P., A. Pant and K. Hedrick, 2004. Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 49: 1835-1841.
CrossRef  |  

38:  Sichitiu, M.L. and M. Kihl, 2008. Inter-vehicle communication systems: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, 10: 88-105.
CrossRef  |  

39:  Sugiura, A. and C. Dermawan, 2005. In traffic jam IVC-RVC system for ITS using Bluetooth. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Sys., 6: 302-313.
CrossRef  |  

40:  Tsai, H.M., C. Saraydar, T. Talty, M. Ames, A. Macdonald and O.K. Tonguz, 2007. ZigBee-based intra-car wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 24-28, 2007, Glasgow, UK., pp: 3965-3971
CrossRef  |  

41:  Willke, T.L., P. Tientrakool and N.F. Maxemchuk, 2009. A survey of inter-vehicle communication protocols and their applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, 11: 3-20.
CrossRef  |  

42:  Xu, Q., R. Sengupta and D. Jiang, 2003. Design and analysis of highway safety communication protocol in 5.9 GHz dedicated short-range communication spectrum. Proceedings of the IEEE Vechicular Technology Conference, Volume 57, April, 2003, USA., pp: 2451-2455

43:  Yin, J., T. ElBatt, G. Yeung, B. Ryu, S. Habermas, H. Krishnan and T. Talty, 2004. Performance evaluation of safety applications over DSRC vehicular ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM VANET International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, October 1, 2004, New York, USA., pp: 1-9

44:  Zheng, N., S. Tang, H. Cheng, Q. Li, G. Lai and F. Wang, 2004. Toward intelligent driver-assistance and safety warning systems. IEEE Intell. Syst., 19: 8-11.
CrossRef  |  

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved