Generally, handoff protocol types could be divided into four: network controlled
handoff (NCHO), mobile assisted handoff (MAHO), soft handoff (SHO) and mobile
controlled handoff (MCHO). NCHO minimizes the duration of handoff since the
network makes a handoff decision. In MAHO technology, measurements are made
by MT and decision is made by MSC. In fact, SHO is a special case of MAHO and
it is a make before break connection. In MCHO, MT has absolutely responsible
for all control of handoff process. On the other hand, not only the RSS measurements
but also handoff decision is made by MT. Nowadays, since 4G access technologies
emerges as a result of development and deployment of evolved 2G/3G infrastructures,
handoff protocols which can support seamless handoff between these heterogeneous
networks are crucial. To approach this goal, researchers have proposed many
literature works by considering many handoff criteria. Among from them, velocity
information is a critical one, especially for overlay systems and velocity adaptive
algorithms. In the overlay systems (Xiao et al.,
2001), to increase the system capacity as much as possible network operators
assign slow-moving users to micro/picocells and fast-moving users to macrocells
by using velocity information. It may also decrease the number of dropped calls
in these overlay systems. Moreover, in cellular systems, arrival time can be
predicted by velocity information and position information of MT and then, communication
channels for handoff calls can be reserved for achievement successful handoff
(Mohanty, 2005). Many researchers have proposed that
velocity information has very significant effect for handoff decision (Bhattacharyal
et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2008; Cha
et al., 2008). Authors have presented an adaptive handoff-relieving
scheduling algorithm (Hui et al., 2007). This
algorithm decreases the handoff over-head and completes the data transmission
with shorter time by using the on-line channel condition and velocity information
together. Therefore, velocity information should be taken into consideration
in handoff decision making to be more efficient since handoff characteristics
greatly depend on the velocity of mobile users. So, here, the important challenges
become how to make accurate prediction of speed of the mobile users and how
to compute precise direction for this movement. To approach these challenges,
the velocity of MT can be divided into two parts as radial velocity and tangential
velocity. Tangential velocity has no effect on signal strength and handoff trigger
(Liu et al., 2008) since only radial velocity
has serious effect on the performance of handoff. Thus, for more actuate and
better handoff management only radial velocity is specifically considered in
this proposed TAVH protocol.
In handoff management, not only velocity information but also location information
plays in a vital role. The tradeoff between using location information sufficiently
and improving handoff performance distinctly is the one of most important challenges
for hand-off management in next generation heterogeneous wireless networks.
The location information has been utilized to assign the hysteresis threshold
adaptively for the improvement of handoff performance (Wang
et al., 2001). Authors have reported an improved handover algorithm
which reduces the number of unnecessary handover by using location and velocity
information estimated from GSM measurement data of different signal strengths
at MT received from base stations (Lin et al., 2005;
Juang et al., 2005). Bing
et al. (2003) have proposed a vertical handover initiation model
for WLAN and UMTS integrated networks based on the received signal strength
(RSS) and distance. From above literature works we can see that location information
is also having great effect or influence upon handoff management. Therefore,
location information should be taken into account in order to provide seamless
handoff between heterogeneous wireless networks. Another important factor to
determine handoff is, of course, the signal strength of the base station at
individual point. Handoff should be started when the receiving signal strength
of MT is lower than the threshold value. But because of noise, the signal strength
used to fluctuate a lot and cause a lot of false trigger for the MN to handoff
and hence Ping-pong handoffs are occurred. Ping-pong handoffs are notorious
for increasing signaling load and so various approaches have been proposed to
avoid these handoffs. Some of the successful approaches include dwelling timer
method, hysteresis margin method, methods applying average rectangular window
on RSS values and application of least square line on RSS values. Among these
methods, we have found that least square line method (Kim
et al., 2007) is very promising in reducing Ping-Pong handoff.
Based upon all of beforehand information, TAVH protocol which provides seamless handoff between WiMAX and 3GPP evolved packet networks is proposed in this study. TAVH protocol comprises of neighbor discovery unit, handoff signaling delay estimation unit, speed and distance calculation unit, RSS measurement unit, handoff trigger unit and handoff execution unit. In order to fully understand how the proposed TAVH protocol works, the operation of TAVH protocol is presented. Since proxy mobile IPv-6 (PMIPv-6) is used for supporting Inter mobility management between these networks, the operation of MIPv-6 is explained in detail. Moreover, simple network architecture for WiMAX and 3GPP interworking based on the architecture standardized by3GPP in the context of Rel-8 specifications is presented with detail explanation. Then simulation is done for performance analysis and comparison of proposed TAVH protocol.
PROXY MOBILE IPV-6 (PMIPv-6)
One of network based protocols, PMIPv-6 is used so that mobile nodes (MNs)
to continue IP sessions without mobility management operations since network
can track the movements of the host and initiate the required mobility signaling
on its behalf (Diab et al., 2008). Proxy MIPv-6
is a network-based IP which can support mobility management to mobile node so
that MN does not need to serve any IP mobility related signaling. PMIPv-6 works
with mobility entities in the network including Local Mobility Anchor (LMA)
and the Mobile Access Gateway (MAG). LMA is not only the home agent for the
mobile node in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain but also topological anchor point
with its home network since it handles binding state of the UE. MAG handles
mobility management concern with tracking of UE's movement which attaches with
its access link, as well as, signaling the mobile node's local mobility anchor
since it is a gate way. How PMIP-6 works for handoff processing is explained
as demonstrated in Fig. 1. Firstly, MN has to detach with
its previous mobility access gateway (p-MAG) since it can not be reached more.
So, it starts detached event by informing LMA to remove the binding and routing
state for that mobile node. After it receives back acknowledgment message from
LMA, MN can start attachment with new mobility access gateway (n-MAG). Thus,
MN sends solicitation message to n-MAG in order to bind it proxy new care of
address with LMA. When LMA accepts this proxy binding update message (PBU),
it allocates mobile node's home network prefix (es) (HNP) and set ups binding
cache entry (BCE) as well as it tunnel to n-MAG. After that, n-MAG sends router
advertisement message to MN to retain home address (HoA) delivered from home
network prefix (es).
INTERWORKING ARCHITECTURE OF WiMAX AND 3GPP EVOLVED PACKET CORE
This core network architecture for WiMAX and 3GPP interworking is intended
to support the high-throughput and low latency with its simplicity. To reach
this approach, we present the network architecture for WiMAX and 3GPP interworking
as shown in Fig. 2. This interworking architecture is greatly
based on the architecture standardized by3GPP in the context of Rel-8 specifications
(3GPP TS 23.401, 2008; 3GPP TS 23.402, 2008). We assume that UE can access 3GPP
radio accesses as well as non-3GPP, WiMAX technology. But, UE will access only
one service at the same time. On the other hand, hard handoff is performed when
UE needs to switch from WiMAX to 3GPP radio technologies or the reverse requirement
of that one. We explain detail the simple interworking architecture between
3GPP radio technologies and WiMAX service which we use so that the readers fully
understand how the proposed TAVH protocol works.
node handoff signaling call flow|
The 3GPP is a collaborative agreement between standards development organizations
and other bodies for the production of a complete set of globally applicable
technical specifications. The core network architecture of 3GPP's future Long
Term Evolution (LTE) wireless communication standard is System Architecture
Evolution (SAE). And, the core network component of SAE is Evolved Packet Core
(EPC). Evolved packet core (EPC) is intended to support and integrate a new
all-IP core network not only for 3GPP radio technologies such as Evolved Universal
Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN), UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network
(UTRAN), GSM/EDGE Radio Access Network (GERAN), but also for non-3GPP access
such as wireless local area network (WLAN) and WiMAX networks. EPC comprises
with Mobility Management Entity (MME), Serving Gateway (S-GW) and PDN Gateway
(P-GW). MME manages and stores the UE control plane context, generates temporary
Id, UE authentication, authorization of Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN), mobility
management. S-GW is a gate way for all 3GPP-specific access technologies as
well as it is a mobility anchor between 2G/3G and LTE.
architecture for WiMAX and 3GPP interworking|
On the other hand, it serves like a gate way between serving GPRS support node
(SGSN) and the PDN gateway (P-GW). User and bearer information exchange for
inter 3GPP access system mobility is done by through S4 interface
which provides the user plane with related control and mobility support between
GPRS Core and the 3GPP Anchor and is based on Gn reference point as defined
between SGSN and GGSN. P-GW is a common gate way all data paths delivered from
3GPP services or WiMAX service or WLAN service and hence it handles many mobility
management including packet filtering, interception, charging and IP address
Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is an emerging fixed
broadband wireless technology so that it can provide broadband wireless access
(BWA) up to 30 miles (50 km) for fixed stations and 3-10 miles (5-15 km) for
mobile stations (Zhang and Hsiao-Hwa, 2008). Here, in
the proposed 3GPP radio technologies and WiMAX interworking architecture, WiMAX
is based on IEEE 802.16e specification, the mobile version of WiMAX. A Mobile
WiMAX network comprises of three major components: mobile stations (MSs), network
access providers (NAPs) and network service providers (NSPs). MS establishes
user equipment interface with its home authentication, authorization and accounting
(AAA) server so that authentication and authorization can be served. A NAP is
an operator for access networks and hence it comprises of many Access Services
Networks (ASNs) which provide WiMAX access services for the UE. The ASN comprises
of base stations (BSs) which are controlled by one or more ASN-gateways (ASN-GWs).
ASN-GW is not only for this purpose, but also it serves as a gateway between
an ASN and a connectivity services network (CSN). So, control function such
as AAA, policy enforcement and mobility management between ASNs and CSNs are
served through this interface.
The WiMAX is connected to 3GPP Evolved Packet Core via the P-GW and to the 3GPP Authentication, Authorization, Accounting (AAA) server for the WiMAX authentication process. Detail authentication process of WiMAX is served by using the EAP framework. The policy and charging (PCC) can be used for authorization purpose. It is designed to allow policy and charging rules function (PCRF) (3GPP TS 23.203, 2008) so that the QoS and charging authorization can be supported.
OPERATION OF TAVH PROTOCOL
As demonstrated in Fig. 3, TAVH protocol managements
module comprises of neighbor discovery unit, handoff signaling delay estimation
unit, speed calculation unit and distance calculation unit by the data generated
from global position system (GPS) (Kaplan and Hegarty, 2006),
RSS measurement unit and least square line (LSL) and handoff trigger unit and
handoff execution unit. We present the whole operation of proposed protocol
as the following steps.
Neighbor discovery unit: While the Mobile Terminal (MT) moves across
the networks, it learns about neighbor BSs using neighbor discovery unit. As
MT roams, it discoveries which preferred services are becoming available so
that it can switch. For instance, MT is currently serviced by 3-GPP access but
once WLAN or WiMAX which can offer higher bandwidth, lower cost and better quality
than 3-GPP are available, it will switch to WLAN or WiMAX networks to enjoy
by the preferred services. Neighbor discovery can be done possibly with two
ways: by MT alone without any assisted or by network-assisted. If neighbor discovery
is performed by MT alone, this method is very simple and does not need any modifications
in the network. However, battery power consumption may be rapidly high since
nowadays user demands are increasing day by day, or, MT can not get enough information
about neighbor BSs, or, two receivers may be needed (one is for discovery and
another is for ongoing sessions). The main advantage of using network-assisted
is neighbor discovery unit can get information of neighbor BSs easily by having
each cell in the network broadcast a list of neighbor cells. But, it needs to
be sure that neighbor discovery unit can collect information of each neighbor
BSs without any data loss since one receiver MT may be used in this method.
Moreover, special functional entity proposed (3GPP TS 23.402, 2008) for WiMAX
and 3GPP systems can be used as the access network discovery and selection function
(ANDSF). TAVH protocol performs horizontal or vertical handoff accordance by
the information of ANDSF in neighbor discovery unit since it can learn the details
of neighboring BSs including IP address in order to decide which kind of handoff
should be performed by TAVH protocol.
Handoff signaling delay estimation unit: The handoff signaling delay
is the time taken for the whole handoff process. How long the time taken greatly
depends on which kind of handoff type: horizontal handoff or vertical handoff.
On the other hand, it greatly depends on the third part of handoff process.
We use the protocol PMIPv-6 to estimate handoff signaling delay for handoff
process. Firstly, mobility access gateway (MAG) of UE sends binding update message
to LMA to inform its current address.
of trajectory-aware vertical handoff management architecture
Then, LMA creates the Binding Cache entry as well as sets up bi-directional
tunnel to the mobile access gateway before acknowledgment message. After the
MAG has received acknowledgment message, it also serves necessary mobility functions.
Then, MAG sends router advertisement messages to the mobile node and hence packets
transmission can be done through by MAG since it already has necessary information
including home network prefix (es). PMIPv-6 protocol signaling delay estimation
unit counts the time taken during whole handoff process. Since PMIv-6 handles
mobility management by Mobile Access Gateway (MAG) and Local Mobility Anchor
LMA, packets sent by an MN should traverse the MNs MAG as well as LMA
and hence it introduces some delay. So, handoff signaling delay time can not
be same for any type of applications as well as it can not be constant for all.
But, here, we assign handoff signaling delay to a constant value based on the
requirement of the type of service which we are using.
Handoff initiation: While UE moves between the networks, it learns neighbor
cells so that handoff decision can be made in correct timing. When handoff decision
is made, UE can do alone without assistance of network as well as with assistance
of network since there is available information about neighbor cells generated
by neighbor discovery unit. Thus, even though UE is currently serviced by a
3GPP cell, it can correctly switch once WiMAX service becomes available. When
UE needs to switch from 3GPP to WiMAX or from WiMAX to 3GPP, it is crucial to
decide the right time when it should initiate handoff. Proposed TAVH protocol
makes handoff decision based on two conditions: location and received signal
strength of MT. Handoff trigger unit uses radial velocity information and location
information generated from GPS or A-GPS (Kaplan and Hegarty,
2006) and handoff signaling delay so that adaptive distance threshold can
be calculated. Another condition for handoff decision is, of course, RSS of
MT. Here, RSS of MT is applied by least square line (LSL) firstly in order to
take advantages which can avoid unnecessary handoffs or Ping-Pong handoffs.
Accordance by this information, handoff trigger unit in TAVH protocol can decide
precise time when handoff should initiate. The detail processing of handoff
initiation is referenced to (Thazinei and Furong, 2009).
Once handoff trigger unit sends a trigger to handoff executing unit, it starts
PMIPv-6 registration. The operation flow chart of TAVH protocol is demonstrated
in Fig. 4.
chart of trajectory-aware vertical handoff protocol operation|
Handoff execution unit: Once handoff executing unit receives the handoff
trigger, it can be known that the signaling call flow can not be supported longer
by the previously attached mobile access gateway (p-MAG) and hence it needs
to switch the newly attached mobile access gateway (n-MAG). So, p-MAG serves
MN detached event so that MN can attach with n-MAG. Once MN has attached with
n-MAG, n-MAG initiates registration procedures. Firstly, MN binds its new current
address to the local mobility anchor (LMA) by sending Proxy Binding Update message.
procedures when MT moves from WiMAX to 3GPP access
When this message is accepted by LMA, it not only creates the Binding Cache
entry, but also sets up its endpoint of the bi-directional tunnel to the mobile
access gateway. Then, it sends back the Proxy Binding Acknowledgment message
to the n-MAG so that it can set up its endpoint of the bi-directional tunnel
to the local mobility anchor as well as the forwarding for the mobile node's
traffic. Now, n-MAG can send Router Advertisement messages to the mobile node
since it has all required information with home network prefix (es) of the MN.
Once MN has received that advertisement message, address configuration is done.
Then, packets transmission is initiated. Detail processing procedures of handoff
executing unit between WiMAX and 3GPP networks are described as the following.
Handoff procedures when MT moves from WiMAX to 3GPP networks: Figure 5, demonstrates the handoff procedures when MT moves from WiMAX to 3GPP networks. As demonstrated in figure, UE is supported with two interfaces for WiMAX access and 3GPP access (here, we refer GERAN radio interface for 3GPP accesses) and PMIPv-6 has been supported for mobility management between networks through by access routers, gateways. Firstly, UE is serviced by WiMax access through the gate way P-GW. The UE finds an ANDSF in the neighbor discovery unit so that information about all of neighbor 3GPP networks can be downloaded to perform handoff one network of 3GPP networks. Once ANDSF is initiated, UE gets information which the target network is for handoff. Then, UE receives handoff trigger sent from handoff triggering unit in order to start handoff executing processing. UE sends attach request message to Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) through by PDN Gateway (P-GW), Serving Gateway (S-GW) and it authenticates itself with AAA/HSS server accordance by selected 3GPP network's authentication procedures (here, GERAN authentication procedures) so that it can attach with 3GPP network. After the successful authentication, UE receives back attachment response message which informs it that the servicing of 3GPP can be accessed starting from now. Then, MT allocates its current address issued by the FA from GGSN in visited network with HA. After that, UE registers this current address to HA by sending binding update message. When it receives back binding acknowledgment message from HA, it can communicate with corresponding node (CN) through the HA by Proxy MIPv6 tunneling. The packets destined to CN are transmitted by PMIPv-6 tunneling.
Handoff procedures when MT moves from 3GPP to WiMAX: The procedures
for reverse handover from 3GPP to WiMAX networks are demonstrated in Fig.
6. Here, UE is currently supported by 3GPP access (GERAN radio interface)
and PMIPv-6 is a mobility management protocol for UE's roaming between networks.
The UE finds ANDSF from neighbor discovery unit since UE needs the information
of neighbor cells in order to know whether WiMAX services are becoming available.
Then, UE found all neighbor cells data and one WiMAX base station is available.
Once UE receives the handoff trigger delivered from handoff triggering unit,
handoff is decided to initiate at that time. Thus, handoff executing unit starts
Proxy MIPv-6 registration to process handoff from 3GPP to WiMAX network. UE
sends attach request message to P-GW which WiMAX base station is anchored through
PDN Gateway (P-GW). Then, UE authenticates itself with AAA/HSS server accordance
by WiMAX authentication procedures, on the other hand, by processing EAP framework
so that it can access with WiMAX service. After the successful authentication,
P-GW sends attachment response message to UE in order to enjoy WiMAX service
starting from this time. Then, MT allocates its current address issued by ASN-GW
in visited network to HA. After that, UE registers this current address to HA
by sending binding update message. When it receives back binding acknowledgment
message from HA, it can communicate with corresponding node (CN) through the
HA by Proxy MIPv6 tunneling. The packets destined to CN are transmitted by PMIPv-6
SIMULATION, PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF TAVH
An extensive, practical and real-time simulation is carried out to analyze the performance of TAVH and to compare its performance to those of other handoff methods. This analysis comprises of the following parts: simulation model overview, simulation parameters and initial assignments, output parameters, description of handoff methods being compared and analyzed, simulation results and analysis of simulation results.
Simulation model overview: The simulation engine used in for this analysis is MATLAB (Version 7.1). MATLAB is a high-level technical computing language and interactive environment for algorithm development, data visualization, data analysis and numeric computation. The simulation model includes a 3GPP Base Station at the centre of the simulation space and four WiMAX base stations inside its range as shown in Fig. 7.
The range of the 3GPP BS in this simulation is assumed to have 2.4 km radius
and the range of each WiMAX AP is 1 km in radius. Here, WiMAX is assumed to
be the user-preferred service, because it will be more cost efficient and provide
better bandwidth. Four mobile terminals (or mobile nodes), each with different
handoff algorithms, are then assumed to move in a random motion model.
procedures when MT moves from 3GPP to WiMAX|
The MTs will move together as a group inside a predefined rectangular range.
The purpose of MTs moving together in this way is so that they will share the
same trajectory, which provides better relevance in comparison of the performance
of each algorithm.
The random motion model used in this simulation model is very realistic. The
mobiles move with random velocity (random magnitude and random direction) which
is updated in every 1 min. The magnitude of the velocity varies inside the range
from 0 to 30 m sec-1. The direction of the velocity may also be anything
between 0 to 360°. When the MTs get to the boundary of the predefined rectangular
range, they will change their velocity (both magnitude and direction) randomly
to get back inside the range. The predefined rectangular range covers all the
BS and APs. Moreover, it even includes areas where no service is available.
The path-loss and shadowing is used to calculate the RSS of MTs. This model
can be described mathematically as:
||The received power at a reference distance (d0)
||The path loss exponent, d=the distance between base station and MT
||The zero-mean Gaussian random variable
For all BSs, PL is assumed to be -30 dB and do is assumed to be
10% of the range diameter of Bss.
For the simulation to be more realistic, the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with standard variation of 8 dB is added to the RSS computation. The RSS of each MT is measured after every interval of sampling time, which is 1 sec in this simulation. Each simulation is carried out for a runtime of 7200 sec (2 h). To acquire the consistency and reliability in output data, such 2 h long simulations are carried out for 5 times. Therefore, total simulation time for this simulation is 10 h.
Simulation parameters and initial assignments
Handoff delay: Handoff delay is the time elapsed during the process of handoff
in MT when it roams from one service to another. For simplicity of this simulation,
handoff delay is assumed to be 5 sec for all kind of handoffs, including both
3GPP to WiMAX handoff and WiMAX to 3GPP handoff.
Handoff failure: Handoff failure occurs when the MT lost the service from one station while the handoff process is not yet finished. When this happens, MT is connected back to 3GPP BS, on condition that it is still in the service range of the 3GPP BS, after a 10 sec delay. Handoff failures cause undesired interruptions in communication.
False handoff: False handoff is defined as the handoff which occurs earlier than the necessity. Premature handoffs degrade the efficiency and utilization of the communication channels and increase the signaling workload.
Ping-pong handoff: When handoffs occur back and forth between two services within a small specific time, the performance of the communication system is severely affected by the resultant signaling processes. Such kind of handoffs is hereby described as ping-pong handoffs. In this simulation, when handoff between the same two services occurs more than once in 8 sec interval, it is determined as a ping-pong handoff.
Package delivery: In this simulation, it is assumed that the 3GPP BS provides the MT with a bandwidth of 144 kbps, while the MT is moving at vehicular velocity. On the other hand, the bandwidth of WiMAX is assumed to be 11 Mbps, according to IEEE 802.11 b standards. It is considered that an application is transmitting and receiving packages with size of 400 bytes. With 3GPP service, the application will be transmitting/receiving 2 packages per second, while on the other hand, with WiMAX service, it will be transmitting/receiving 10 packages per seconds, both in uplink and downlink. After encountering a handoff and acquiring a new service, the application will wait for 3 sec delay and will start transmitting/receiving packages.
Output parameters: The following parameters are recorded as output of each simulation, number of handoff failures, number of false handoffs, number of ping-pong handoffs, the time for which the MT was being served by each of the 3GPP and WiMAX and total number of packages sent and received by each of3GPP and WiMAX.
From these output data provided by the simulation, the following parameters are calculated.
of the time the MT is being served by 3GPP over total simulation time|
of the time the MT is being served by WiMAX over total simulation time
Package Delivery Ratio (PDR) during the simulation time
throughput during the simulation time
Overall Package Delivery Ratio (PDR) during the simulation time. The PDR is defined as the percentage of packets received over total packets sent.
Overall throughput during the simulation time. Throughput is defined as the
amount of data received during a unit time.
Description of handoff methods being compared and analyzed: In this
simulation, there are four handoff methods which performance will be compared
Plus Dwelling Timer Method and
Normal hysteresis method: In this method, handoff is performed whenever
the RSS of new BS is higher than the RSS of old BS by a predefined value (Zhang
and Holtzman, 1996; Marichamy et al., 2003).
In pseudo codes:
In this simulation, the hysteresis value is assumed to be 10 dB.
Adaptive hysteresis method: This method is basically similar to normal
hysteresis method. However, in this method the hysteresis value is not fixed
as in the normal hysteresis method (Lal and Panwar, 2007;
Zhu and Kyung-Sup, 2007). The hysteresis value is varying
according to the distance of MT from the BS. The hysteresis value is calculated
where, di is the distance between serving BS and MT, R is the radius of serving cell.
Hysteresis plus dwelling timer method: In this method, whenever the
RSS of new BS is higher than the RSS of old BS by a predefined hysteresis value,
a timer is triggered. When this timer reached to certain specified value, handoff
is processed. The dwelling timer is reset when the RSS of new BS is no longer
higher than the RSS of old BS by the hysteresis value or when handoff is processed.
Some references of using dwelling timer are (Pollini, 1996;
Park et al., 2003). In pseudo codes:
In this simulation, the hysteresis value is assumed to be 10 dB and dwelling
delay is assumed to be 3 sec.
Proposed TAVH method: In this method, the position, velocity and RSS of MT are calculated and each and every data is taken in account in handoff decision.
A handoff is carried out whenever the position of MT has reached to a certain boundary, regardless of the RSS. This reduces the rate of handoff failures. Here, the boundary is not the boundary of the range of the BS. The boundary is a safety distance of MT from the BS to assure a successful handoff and this boundary is not fixed and is varying according to the position and velocity of the MT.
On the other hand, handoff is also carried out whenever the RSS of MT has dropped
below predefined threshold value (-60 dB in this simulation). Moreover, LSL
method is applied to RSS values to ensure the avoidance of ping-pong handoffs.
In pseudo codes;
Analysis of simulation results: From the output graphs (Fig.
8-14), it is very obvious that the proposed TAVH method
provides longer service time, more efficient package delivery ratio and better
throughput for each and every service BS. In more spectacular perspective, the
proposed TAVH method also guarantees quality of service (QoS) in terms of precision
in Handoff (Less handoff failure, less false handoff and less ping-pong handoff),
longer total service time and longer user-preferred service time, better overall
package delivery ratio and greater total throughput.
failure for each method
handoff for each method|
handoff for each method|
average throughput for each method|
PDR for each method|
time percentage of 3GPP for each method
time percentage of WiMAX for each method|
It can be concluded that the proposed TAVH method consistently outperform the
other methods in almost every output parameter of this simulation. Moreover,
it should be noted that the performance of the proposed TAVH is not dependent
too much on which RSS threshold level being set, because it utilizes both trajectory
information and RSS information of MT in handoff decision making. On the other
hand, the performance of other methods substantially relies on the parameters
such as hysteresis value and dwelling timer value. Lower hysteresis value will
lead to more ping-pong handoff and higher hysteresis value will cause more handoff
failures. The same concept also applies to the value of dwelling timer. Preset
values of these parameters will not be suitable for all different kind of situations
the MT is considered to encounter. Moreover, it is practically very difficult
to measure the RSS values of both old BS and new BS at every sampling time.
On the other hand the proposed TAVH method uses only the RSS value of old BS
as part of the handoff decision, which is more realistic. Nowadays, the GPS
technologies have become more and more cost-effective, abundant and efficient.
Therefore, the proposed TAVH method is believed to be easily implemented and
to accommodate wider range of powerful applications utilizing reliable and seamless
This study was supported by the national natural science foundation of China under grant No.60572047 and by the program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, NCET-06-0642.