Diversity, Distribution and Abundance of Rodent Community in the Afro-alpine Habitats of the Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia
Species composition, distribution and abundance of rodent community were described in the Simien Mountains National Park. The study was carried out between June, 2011 and May, 2012 during the wet and dry seasons. Six species of rodents (Lophuromys flavopunctatus, Arvicanthis abyssinicus, Stenocephalemys griseicauda, Otomys typus, Rhabdomys pumilio and Tachyoryctes splendens) and two species of insectivores (Crocidura baileyi and Crocidura thalia) were recorded. R. pumilio is the newly recorded species. The distribution of rodents and insectivores was significantly differed (χ2 = 132.3, df = 4, p<0.001) across studied habitats. There was also variation in species abundance in all habitats. S. griseicauda is the highest (45.8%) species recorded in all habitat types followed by A. abyssinicus (28%). Large numbers of individuals were trapped in Helichrysum-Festuca habitat. The mean number ± SE of individuals caught during the day and night were 3.18±0.05 and 1.91±0.72, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference (χ2 = 1.93, df = 1, p>0.05) between the overall number of species recorded during the day and night time. There was variation (χ2 = 25, df = 1, p<0.001) in the number of rodents and insectivores trapped during the wet and dry seasons. The average number ±SE of rodents and insectivores caught during the wet and dry seasons were 2.77±0.07 and 2.28±0.07, respectively. Human interference and grazing pressure influenced the rodent community in the study area. This should be curtailed so as to increase the species composition and abundance of rodents. Hence, this will help to sustain their ecological importance in the study area.
Received: July 25, 2012;
Accepted: September 06, 2012;
Published: December 17, 2012
Rodents are the most diverse group of mammals (Vaughan et
al., 2000). They show great diversity in their ecology, morphology,
physiology, behaviour and life history strategies (Nedbal
et al., 1996). They are well adapted to a wide range of environments
(Nowak, 1999). Rodents are also the most diverse and abundant
among mammals in Africa (Bekele, 1996). There are 84
species of rodents in Ethiopia (Bekele and Leirs, 1997).
Of the total rodent species of the country, 21% are endemic. The unique topography
and wide range of climatic conditions are reasons for diverse biological resources
in Ethiopia (Hillman, 1993). Rodents are better adapted
to the afro-alpine environment than large mammals due to their ability to avoid
temperature fluctuations by hiding themselves in their burrows (Marino,
2003). The presence of large body size is another adaptation for the afro-alpine
rodents. Most (60%) of the rodent fauna of the country is confined to the highlands
and there are at least 14 endemic species of rodents, all from the northwestern,
central and southeastern highland plateaux (Yalden and Largen,
1992). Six endemic species belong to the afro-alpine moorland above 3000
m.a.s.l. (Dendromus lovati, Arvicanthis blicki, Stenocephalemys
griseicauda, Stenocephalemys albipes, Praomys ruppi and
Mus mahomet), four endemic species occur in mountain grassland (Tachyoryctes
macrocephalus, Stenocephalemys albocaudata, Lophuromys melanonyx
and Megadendromus nikolausi) and the other four endemics occur in mountain
forest areas. Furthermore, 16 species of rodents which are not endemic live
in the highlands. However, only some species like Tachyoryctes splendens,
Otomys typus, Lophuromys flavopunctatus and Arvicanthis abyssinicus
survive above 3000 m.a.s.l. (Yalden and Largen, 1992).
Usually, night frosts, diurnal temperature fluctuations and strong irradiation
are common in the afro-alpine areas. However, rodents can avoid extreme cold
by staying underground so that they are inherently well adapted as the dominant
herbivores of the afro-alpine ecosystem (Marino, 2003).
Rodents show habitat preferences and this mainly is dependent upon the vegetation
type and life history strategies (Fitzherbert et al.,
2007). There are rodents that can only survive in a narrow altitudinal range
whereas others are altitude generalists (Mukinzi et al.,
2005). Their distribution and abundance are influenced by environmental
factors such as the nature and density of vegetation, climatic conditions, disease,
predation and habitat exploitation by humans (Johnson and
Horn, 2008). Absence of sufficient food and ground cover largely determine
the number of individual rodents in a certain area. The loss of ground vegetation
leads to loss of cover and food supply for small mammals thereby decreasing
rodent diversity but increasing predation risk (Hoffmann
and Zeller, 2005). On the other hand, habitat structure and predation risk
affect species composition in various habitat types (Massawe
et al., 2007). Bushy vegetation provides safe sites for germination
and growth of herbaceous vegetation, hence enhancing the diversity of rodent
food resources (Kerley et al., 2004). The density
of rodents enhances in habitats such as bushland, grassland and forest in the
presence of ample food (Lentic and Dickman, 2005). The
diversity of species can be resulted from habitat variability due to the supply
of different resources (Cramer and Willig, 2002).
In terms of evolution, rodents are quite young where the populations retain
unexploited source of genetic variability (Vaughan et al.,
2000). The number of rodents and their dynamics usually depend upon extensive
vegetation cover (Hansson, 1999). Rodents form vital
components of ecosystems (Avenant and Cavallini, 2007).
They interact extensively with their environments and their activities have
beneficial effects on other organisms in different ecosystems. They are important
dietary components for many carnivorous small mammal, raptors and reptiles (Davies,
2002). They are vital food for the survival of the Ethiopian wolf (Canis
simensis) (Sillero-Zubiri et al., 1995).
On the other hand, they are host of disease causing parasites such that wild
rodents can host Schistosoma mansoni (El-Naggar et
al., 2011). Ecological studies of the rodent communities in Ethiopia
are important due to their high levels of endemism. In addition, the Ethiopian
wolf heavily depends on rodents for its survival (Malcolm
and Sillero-Zubiri, 1997). Thus, studies of the rodent community are important
to assess habitat quality for wolves and as a predictor wolf density. Hence,
the present study covers species composition and abundance.
A few studies of rodent biology have been conducted in the southeastern highlands
of the Bale Mountains (Lavrenchenko et al., 1995)
and only few studies were conducted in the northwestern highlands of Simien
Mountains (Hurni, 1986). In the Simien Mountains National
Park, small mammals are of special interest for different reasons. Several species
are endemic and occurring only in the highland areas of Ethiopia (Yalden
and Largen, 1992). Therefore, the present study investigates diversity,
distribution, abundance, habitat association and activity patters of rodents
in the afro-alpine habitats of the Simien Mountains National Park.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study area: The Simien Mountains National Park (SMNP) represents
one of the most scenic natural areas in the world. It is a part of the Simien
Mountains located between 38000'-38012'E and 13012'-13019N (Fig.
1). Originally, the area of SMNP used to be 136 km2 but recently
the area has been extended to 412 km2. It contains broad undulating
plateau and grassy plains. The area includes Mt. Ras Dejen which is the highest
mountain in Ethiopia (4,543 m.a.s.l.). The massif was formed 25 million years
ago. In the process, the igneous basalts have been eroded to form precipitous
cliffs and deep gorges. Some cliffs reach 1,500 m.a.s.l. and extend horizontally
long distances. The plateau is surrounded on the south and northeast by deep
valleys of Tekeze River (Hurni and Ludi, 2000).
SMNP was nationally gazetted in 1969. Then, it was designated as a World Heritage
Site in 1978 due to the presence of high number of endemic species, unique bio-physical
features and its international significance. However, in 1996 it was listed
as World Heritage in Danger. This is because of the declining number of Walia
ibex (Capra walie) population, agricultural encroachment, loss of biodiversity
and impact of road construction (Falch and Keiner, 2000).
However, currently the wildlife is increasing from time to time due to effective
and community based conservation. The climate of SMNP varies from area to area.
Generally, the highlands have a relatively low temperature. They are cold in
the early mornings of the dry season and receive annual rainfall of 1500 mm
which occurs mainly from May to October (Hurni, 1986).
The temperature of the area shows high diurnal variability. The annual minimum
temperature ranges from -4-2.5°C in January and maximum temperature from
11-18°C in April.
|| Map of Simien Mountains National Park and the study area
The SMNP is part of the afro-alpine centre of plant diversity with high level
of endemism. The park preserves a representative part of the Ethiopian Tropical
seasonal highland biome and contains vegetation characteristics of each (Debonnet
et al., 2006). It consists of a mixture of Afro-alpine woods, heath
forest, high mountain vegetation, montane savanna and moorland (Hurni
and Ludi, 2000). In the SMNP, 57 tree species and herbaceous plants have
been recorded. There are over 20 endemic plant species within and in the buffer
zone of the SMNP (Falch and Keiner, 2000). Numerous species
of mammals and birds exist in SMNP (Hurni, 1986). In the
SMNP, there are 22 large mammals, 13 small mammals and 180 bird species.
Trapping: A permanent 4900 m2 live trapping grid was established
at five randomly selected habitat types (Festuca-Lobelia, Lobelia
stand, Festuca grassland, Festuca-Carex and Festuca-Helichrysum
habitats) for three consecutive days and nights. In each trapping site, a standard
square (seven rows by seven columns) trapping grid was established during wet
and dry seasons (Linzey and Kesner, 1997). A total of
49 Sherman traps (5.5x6.5x16 cm) were set per grid at every 10 m interval between
points during both seasons. The traps were baited with peanut butter and barley
flour. Traps were covered with leaves and grasses to prevent from cold weather
consequently death of rodents and to avoid the damage of traps by other wild
animals. The traps were checked twice a day early morning (between 06:00 and
07:00 h) and late afternoon (between 17:00 and 18:00 h). Animals caught from
06:00-18:00 h were recorded as day trappings and those caught from 18:00-06:00
h the next morning as night trappings. Each trapped animal was captured alive,
identified, marked by toe clipping and released back to the site from where
it was trapped (Linzey and Kesner, 1997; Clausnitzer,
2003). Information such as weight, sex, approximate age (juvenile, sub-adult
and adult) based on their weight and coat colour (Bekele,
1996) and reproductive condition (for females: Imperforate or perforated
vagina and for males: Scrotal or abdominal testes) were recorded. Furthermore,
tail length, ear length, hind foot length and incisor type at lower jaw (grooved
or ungrooved) was also recorded for identification purposes.
Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software package version 17 and Microsoft Excel. Chi-square test was performed to test significant variation of the number of individuals caught across habitat types, seasons and time. One-way ANOVA was also used to test mean differences of seasonal distribution and variation in age classes.
Diversity and abundance: A total of 672 individual rodents (order Rodentia: Family Muridae and Rhizomyidae) and insectivores (order Insectivora) were captured in five habitat types during wet and dry seasons. Rodent species which were identified and recorded were: Lophuromys flavopunctatus, Arvicanthis abyssinicus, Stenocephalemys griseicauda, Tachyoryctes splendens, Otomys typus and Rhabdomys pumilio. Two insectivore species, Crocidura baileyi and Crocidura thalia were also recorded. Rhabdomys pumilio is a new record for Simien Mountains National Park. The relative abundance of caught rodent and insectivore species include: A. abyssinicus (28%), L. flavopunctatus (11.6%), S. griseicauda (45.8%), T. splendens (0.9%), R. pumilio (0.9%), O. typus (1.2%), C. baileyi (10.1%) and C. thalia (1.5%) (Table 1).
Distribution, habitat association and activity patterns: The distribution
of rodents and insectivores significantly differed (χ2 = 132.3,
df = 4, p<0.001) across studied habitats throughout the study period. Variation
in species composition and abundance was observed across all habitats. A.
abyssinicus, S. griseicauda and C. baileyi were widely distributed
in all habitats. S. griseicauda (n = 308) is the largest recorded rodent
species from all habitat types followed by A. abyssinicus (n = 188).
On the other hand, T. splendens (n = 6) and R. pumilio (n = 6)
were the least recorded species in the study area. T. splendens was recorded
form Lobelia stand and Festuca-Carex habitat whereas R. pumilio
was only recorded from Festuca-Lobelia habitat (Table 2).
Most (33.9%) of the species were trapped from Helichrysum-Festuca habitat followed by Festuca grassland habitat (27.1%). Furthermore, 14.1 and 12.5% of the species were trapped from Festuca-Carex and Festuca-Lobelia habitats, respectively. The least number of species was recorded from Lobelia stand habitat (12.2%) (Fig. 2).
The number of different species of rodents and insectivores caught across all five habitat types had been further sub-divided in to those caught during the day and night. A total of 354 (52.7%) individuals were captured during the night time and 318 (47.3%) during day time. The mean number ±SE of individuals caught was 3.18±0.05 during the night and 1.91±0.72 during the day time. However, there was no statistically significant difference (χ2 = 1.93, df = 1, p>0.05) between the overall number of species recorded during the day and night time (Fig. 3).
There was a significant difference (χ2 = 306.5, df = 7, p<0.001) in the proportion of each species trapped during the day and night time. A. abyssinicus and L. flavopunctatus were primarily diurnal whereas S. griseicauda, C. baileyi, C. thalia and R. pumilio were nocturnal. However, equal numbers of O. typus individuals were trapped during day and night time.
|| Number of rodent and insectivore species and their relative
abundance in the study area
|| Number of rodent and insectivore species recorded in different
|FL: Festuca-Lobelia, LS: Lobelia stand, FG:
Festuca-grassland, HF: Helichrysum-Festuca, FC: Festuca-Carex
||Percentage of species trapped in different habitats, FL: Festuca-Lobelia,
LS: Lobelia stand, FG: Festuca-grassland, HF: Helichrysum-Festuca
and FC: Festuca-Carex grassland
|| Percentage of rodents and insectivores caught during day
and night time
Seasonal variation: Species caught significantly differed (χ2 = 25, df = 1, p<0.001) in their number during the wet and dry seasons. During the dry season, 402 individuals were trapped whereas during the wet season 270 individuals were caught. S. griseicauda was the highest number of species caught during the dry (n = 208) and wet (n = 100) seasons followed by A. abyssinicus during the dry (n = 89) and wet (n = 99) seasons. All species were caught during both seasons except O. typus. O. typus was not trapped during the wet season (Table 3). The mean number ±SE of rodents and insectivores caught were 2.77±0.07 and 2.28±0.07 during the dry and wet seasons, respectively.
The distribution of rodents and insectivores significantly differed (F670 1 = 30.49, p<0.001) across studied habitats during wet and dry seasons. The highest number of individuals was caught in Helichrysum-Festuca habitat during both the wet (n = 77, 28.5%) and dry (n = 151, 37.6%) seasons (Fig. 4).
Sex and age structure: The distribution of sex is significantly different
among individuals (χ2 = 91.5, df = p<0.001) and across seasons
(χ2 = 25.9, df = 1, p<0.001). Most (68.5%) of the trapped
individuals were males and the remaining 31.5% were females. S. griseicauda
consisted of the highest number of female (n = 66) and male (n = 142) individual
in the dry season. On the other hand, the highest number of caught species was
male A. abyssinicus (n = 77) followed by male S. griseicauda (n
= 64) during the wet season. Female individuals of T. splendens were
not caught during both seasons (Table 4).
||Total number of rodents and insectivores across all habitats
caught during wet and dry seasons, FL: Festuca-Lobelia, LS: Lobelia
stand, FG: Festuca-grassland, HF: Helichrysum-Festuca and
FC: Festuca-Carex grassland
|| Number and relative percentage of rodents and insectivores
caught during the wet and dry seasons
|| Sex distribution of rodents and insectivores across seasons
|| Age distribution of trapped rodents and insectivores during
the dry and wet seasons
Of the total number of species caught, 58% (n = 390) were adults, 37.8% (n
= 254) were sub-adults and 4.2% (n = 28) were juveniles. There is a significant
variation (F 670 1 = 5.12, p<0.05) among species caught in terms
of their age class across seasons. Adults were largely caught in both dry (n
= 218) and wet (n = 172) seasons. In contrast, juveniles were the least caught
groups during the dry (n = 18) and wet (n = 10) seasons (Fig.
Diversity and abundance: Different rodent species are confined in the
highlands of Ethiopia (Yalden and Largen, 1992). According
to the present study, six species of rodents (A. abyssinicus-unstriped
grass rat, L. flavopunctatus-harsh-furred rat, S. griseicauda-narrow
headed rat, O. typus-swamp rat, T. splendens-common mole rat and
R. pumilio-striped grass mouse) and two species of insectivores (C.
baileyi and C. thalia-white toothed shrews) have been recorded in
the SMNP. However (Guttinger et al., 1998) recorded
six species of rodents (A. abyssinicus, L. flavopunctatus, S.
griseicauda, T. splendens, O. typus and Pelomys harringtoni)
and one species of shrew (C. baileyi). Pelomys harringtoni had
not been recorded in our study whereas R. pumilio was not recorded before
in the SMNP. On the other hand (Busby et al., 2006)
recorded three species of rodents (A. abyssinicus, L. flavopunctatus
and O. typus) and one insectivore species (C. thalia). S.
griseicauda is the most abundant (45.8%) rodent species in the study area.
Similarly, a study conducted in Guassa area of Menz indicated that S. griseicauda
was the most abundant species in all habitat types (Tefera,
Distribution, habitat association and activity pattern: The distribution
of rodents varied across habitats throughout the study area. Although, S.
griseicauda was distributed in all habitat types, it was highly abundant
in Festuca grassland habitat. A similar result was observed in Guassa
area of Menz (Tefera, 2001). A. abyssinicus is
one of the endemic species of Ethiopian plateau (Yalden
et al., 1976). A. abyssinicus was distributed in all habitat
types but its abundance was high in Helichrysum-Festuca habitat. According
to Yalden et al. (1976), L. flavopunctatus
is a widely distributed species in Ethiopia. Kityo and Clausnitzer
(2001) added that the species has a wide range of distribution along the
different montane and highland habitats of East Africa. But, this species has
moderate ecological tolerance confined only to three or four habitats of forests
(Happold, 1974). L. flavopunctatus is also highly
abundant in Helichrysum-Festuca habitat. However, it was not trapped
in Lobelia stand habitat. Lophuromys spp. shows a habitat preference
of long grass cover and is known to be intolerant of grazing (Marino,
2003). O. typus was trapped from Festuca-Lobelia and Festuca-Carex
habitats. It was not caught in any other habitats. Similarly, O. typus,
was common in Festuca, Lobelia, Carex habitat of the Simien Mountains
National Park (Guttinger et al., 1998).
The present study added R. pumilio as the newly recorded species of
rodents in the SMNP although, some scientists reported as Rhabdomys is
missing in Ethiopia (Kityo and Clausnitzer, 2001). It
was caught only in Festuca-Lobelia habitat during day time. R. pumilio
cannot cope with hot climatic condition so it is restricted to high altitude
area in East Africa (Delany and Happold, 1979). This restriction
to the grassy afro-alpine area is related to its adaptive physiology (Kityo
and Clausnitzer, 2001). Generally, the distribution of rodent species in
the study area was presumably related to vegetation structure, availability
of food and human and livestock impact in the study area. The grazing by livestock
had a significant impact in the rodent community. Grazing has a number of detrimental
effects which directly impact on rodent communities including food competition,
trampling of rodent holes, reduced vegetation height and associated reductions
in predation cover (Guttinger et al., 1998).
Habitat association is important to determine how various species respond to
environmental heterogeneity (Martin, 1998). Habitat
selection may have evolved as a result of past competitive effects but, only
weak interspecific competition perhaps necessary to maintain habitat selection.
Hence, the coexistence of species can be determined by resource availability
and by means of which species utilizes which habitat and interact with others
(Schoener, 1983). The abundance of rodents varied across
all habitat types in the present study. There was high number of species in
Helichrysum-Festuca followed by Festuca grassland habitats. This
is probably because such habitats are good in providing shelter due to their
dense cover. The least number of rodents was captured in Lobelia stand
habitat. This may be related to the poor cover of the habitat exposing rodents
to predators and other factors that decrease their population (Iyawe,
1988) indicated that habitat selection of different species of small mammals
mainly relies on the vegetation of the given habitat. This idea is also supported
by Taylor and Green (1976) where cover removal reduced
most species of rodent population. Whenever there is enough cover and adequate
food, the abundance of rodent population is high.
There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the overall
number of individuals caught during the day and night time. However, there was
a significant difference (p<0.001) in the proportion of each species trapped
during the day and night time. Although the number of rodents trapped was higher
during the night time than day time, the largest proportion of caught species
was S. griseicauda (n = 256). Because of this reason, most rodents caught
during the present study were diurnal. Similarly, a study conducted in Bale
Mountains National Park (Sillero-Zubiri et al., 1995)
and Guassa area of Menz (Tefera, 2001) also endorsed
this idea in that most rodents in afro-alpine habitats show a diurnal activity
pattern. The extreme low temperatures experienced at high altitude could impose
limitation on the activity patterns of rodents. According to the present study,
A. abyssinicus and L. flavopunctatus are diurnal rodents although
some individuals are caught during night time. On the other hand, S. griseicauda
is strictly nocturnal as very few individuals are trapped during the day time.
Similar result was recorded in Guassa area of Menz (Tefera,
2001). According to Tefera (2001), thermoregulatory
adaptation of S. griseicauda could be achieved by lowering its metabolic
rate. In addition to this, environmental constraints, competition and predation
may be crucial in determining the structure of rodent community.
Seasonal distribution: In the present study, there was variation (p<0.001)
in the number of rodents and insectivores caught during the wet and dry seasons
(Table 3). All the species trapped in this study were included
during the dry season. However, O. typus was not trapped during the wet
season. This variation may be caused by seasonal variation in vegetation structure,
ground cover and other related environmental variables. Decreasing in food resources
and vegetation cover mainly resulted from variation in habitat structures (Juch,
2000). Hence, the overall species composition of small mammals is affected.
Habitat changes might be brought about by different factors. Joubert
and Ryan (1999) revealed that diversity, distribution and abundance of small
mammals are affected by wild ungulates and livestock due to over grazing. This
might cause seasonal variation in the existence of a species in a given habitat.
The largest proportion of individuals trapped in Helichrysum-Festuca
habitat during both wet (28.5%) and dry (37.6%) seasons (Fig.
4). This is probably because such habitat provides a good shelter for them.
Sex and age structure: The distribution of sex among individuals trapped
significantly differed (p<0.001). In this study, 68.5% of the total caught
individuals were males whereas the remaining 31.5% were females. Nearly similar
results were reported by Shenkut et al. (2006)
in Alleltu Woreda, Ethiopia. Furthermore, this result is supported by the study
conducted in southwest Ethiopia (Bayessa, 2010). The
significant variation in the proportion of female and male population presumably
was the result of differences in the mobility of males. Males generally make
wider field excursion than females as reported by Odhiambo
and Oguge (2003) in Kenyan Rift Valley. On the other hand, the responsibility
of females in nursing their litters might have hindered their movement from
one area to the other, consequently limiting the chance of entering the traps.
All age groups (adults, sub-adults and juveniles) were included in all trapping
sessions. However, there was a significant variation (p<0.05) among individuals
caught in terms of their age groups across seasons. Most (58%) of the individuals
caught were adults. The least caught individuals were juveniles (4.2%). This
could probably be due to the presence of large home ranges for adults and sub-adults
to alleviate the cost of competition with juveniles. This is supported by (Gebresilassie
et al., 2006) in that adult and sub-adult individuals have wider
home range than young rodents. The capture rates of all age groups were higher
during the dry season than during the wet season. This is because, during the
dry season there is higher movement of rodents outside their burrow than during
the wet season.
The Simien Mountains National Park is largely affected by human population pressure and livestock impact. This determines the rodent population in the study area. In addition, rodent populations are also affected by climatic factors according to the previous studies. Rodents have ecological importance in the study area. One of their ecological importance is that they are used as the main prey source for the Ethiopian wolf. Thus, affecting the population of rodents can determine the fate of Ethiopian wolf population in the area. Therefore, the effect of livestock grazing and humans on the rodent population in the Park should be curtailed. The present study is only conducted in the afro-alpine habitats of the Simien Mountains National Park. Hence further investigation need to be carried out in the lowland areas of the Park as well to get a complete picture.
We sincerely thank Addis Ababa University for funding this study. We are also grateful to the Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority for providing permit.
1: Bekele, A. and H. Leirs, 1997. Population ecology of rodents of maize fields and grassland in central Ethiopia. Belg. J. Zool., 127: 39-48.
Direct Link |
2: Bayessa, D., 2010. Species composition, distribution, abundance and habitat association of rodents in forest and farmlands around Tepi, southwest Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
3: Bekele, A., 1996. Population dynamics of the Ethiopian endemic rodent, Praomys albipes in the Menagesha State Forest. J. Zool., 238: 1-12.
4: Avenant, N.L. and P. Cavallini, 2007. Correlating rodent community structure with ecological integrity, Tussen-die-Riviere Nature Reserve, Free State Province, South Africa. Integr. Zool., 2: 212-219.
CrossRef | PubMed |
5: Busby, G., J. Busby, J. Grant, R. Hoolahan and C. Marsden, 2006. The lone wolf project final report: An expedition to the Simien Mountains, Ethiopia. University of Edinburgh, pp: 137.
6: Clausnitzer, V., 2003. Rodents of Mt. Elgon, Uganda: Ecology, Biogeography and the Significance of Fire. Society for Tropical Ecology, Uganda, ISBN-13: 9783980778022, Pages: 184.
7: Cramer, M.J. and M.R. Willig, 2002. Habitat heterogeneity, habitat associations and rodent species diversity in a Sand-Shinnery-Oak Landscape. J. Mammal., 83: 743-753.
Direct Link |
8: Davies, G., 2002. African Forest Biodiversity: A Field Survey Manual for Vertebrates. Earthwatch Institute, Oxford, UK., Pages: 161.
9: Debonnet, G., L. Melamari and B. Bomhard, 2006. Reactive monitoring mission to simien mountains national park, Ethiopia. WHC/IUCN Mission Report, UNESCO, Paris and IUCN, Switzerland.
10: Delany, M.J. and D.C.D. Happold, 1979. Ecology of the African Mammals. Longman, London, Uk Pages: 434.
11: El-Naggar, S.A., I.M. Al-Sharkawi and G.A. Madkour, 2011. Susceptibility of some wild rodents widely distributed in Egyptian Foci to Schistosoma mansoni infection under laboratory conditions. Int. J. Zool. Res., 7: 358-368.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
12: Falch, F. and M. Keiner, 2000. Simien mountains national park management plan. Final Draft, Amhara National Regional State, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
13: Fitzherbert, E., T. Gardner, T. Caro and P. Jenkins, 2007. Habitat preferences of small mammals in the Katavi ecosystem of western Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol., 45: 249-257.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
14: Gebresilassie, W., A. Bekele, G. Belay and M. Balakrishnan, 2006. Home range and reproduction of rodents in Maynugus irrigation field, northern Ethiopia. SINET Ethiopia J. Sci., 29: 57-62.
Direct Link |
15: Guttinger, R., L. Leumann, M. Getahun, J. Simmen and M. Wust, 1998. The Actual Situation of Several Small Mammal Species in the Park Area. In: A Survey on the Flora and Fauna of the Simien Mountains National Park, Ethiopia, Nievergelt, B., T. Good and R. Guttinger (Eds.). EWNHS and Group for Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Zurich, Switzerland, pp: 64-73.
16: Hansson, L., 1999. Intraspecific variation in dynamics: Small rodents between food and predation in changing landscapes. Oikos, 86: 159-169.
Direct Link |
17: Happold, D.C.D., 1974. The Small rodents of the forest-savanna farmland association near Ibadan, Nigeria with observations on reproduction biology. Rev. Zool. Afr., 88: 814-834.
18: Hillman, J.C., 1993. Ethiopia: Compendium of Wildlife Conservation Information (CWCI). Vol. 1, Ethiopia Wildlife Conservation Organization, Addis Ababa, pp: 27.
19: Hoffmann, A. and U. Zeller, 2005. Influence of variations in land use intensity on species diversity and abundance of small mammals in the Nama Karoo, Namibia. Belg. J. Zool., 135: 91-96.
20: Hurni, H. and E. Ludi, 2000. Reconciling Conservation with Sustainable Development. University of Berne, Switzerland.
21: Hurni, S.J., 1986. Management Plan: Simien Mountains National Park and Surrounding Rural Area. UNESCO World Heritage Committee, Switzerland.
22: Iyawe, J.G., 1988. Distribution of small rodents and shrews in a lowland rain forest zone of Nigeria, with observations on their reproductive biology. Afr. J. Ecol., 26: 189-195.
23: Johnson, M.D. and C.M. Horn, 2008. Effects of rotational grazing on rodents and raptors in a Coastal Grassland. Western N. Amer. Nat., 68: 444-452.
Direct Link |
24: Joubert, D.F. and P.G. Ryan, 1999. Differences in mammal community structure in semiarid Karoo. S. Afr. J. Zool., 17: 17-27.
25: Juch, P., 2000. Habitat preference of small mammals on Mount Elgon, Uganda. Bull. Soc. Nat. Luxemb., 100: 83-96.
Direct Link |
26: Kerley, G.I.H., W.G. Whitford and F.R. Kay, 2004. Effects of pocket gophers on desert soils and vegetation. J. Arid Environ., 58: 155-166.
Direct Link |
27: Kityo, R. and V. Clausnitzer, 2001. Altitudinal distribution of rodents (Muridae and Gliridae) on Mt Elgon, Uganda. Trop. Zool., 14: 95-118.
Direct Link |
28: Lavrenchenko, L.A., A.N. Milishnikov, V.M. Aniskin, A.A. Warshavsky and W. Gebrekidan, 1995. The Genetic Diversity of Small Mammals of the Bale Mountains. Joint Ethio-Russian Biological Expedition, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
29: Lentic, M. and C.R. Dickman, 2005. The responses of small mammals to patches regenerating after fire and rainfall in the Simpson Desert, central Australia. Aust. Ecol., 30: 24-39.
30: Linzey, A.V. and M.H. Kesner, 1997. Small mammals of a woodland savannah ecosystem in Zimbabwe. I. Density and habitat occupancy patterns. J. Zool. Lond., 243: 137-152.
31: Malcolm, J.R. and C. Sillero-Zubiri, 1997. The Ethiopian Wolf: Distribution and Population Status. In: The Ethiopian Wolf Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Sillero-Zubiri, C. and D.W. Macdonald (Eds.). IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland, pp: 12-25.
32: Marino, J., 2003. Spatial ecology of the Ethiopian wolf, Canis simensis. Ph.D. Thesis, Linacre College, University of Oxford.
33: Martin, T.E., 1998. Are microhabitat preference of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology, 79: 656-670.
Direct Link |
34: Massawe, A.W., W. Rwamugira, H. Leirs, R.H. Makundi and L.S. Mulungu, 2007. Do farming practices influence population dynamics of rodents: A case study of the multimammate field rats, Mastomys natalensis, in Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol., 45: 293-301.
Direct Link |
35: Mukinzi, I., P.G.B. Katuala, J. Kennis, M. Gambalemoke and N. Kadange et al., 2005. Preliminary data on the biodiversity of rodents and insectivores (Mammalia) in the periphery of Kisangani (D.R. Congo). Belg. J. Zool., 135: 133-140.
Direct Link |
36: Nedbal, M.A., R.L. Honeycutt and D.A. Schiltter, 1996. Higher-level systematic of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia): Evidence from the mitochondria 125rRNA Gene. J. Mammal. Evol., 3: 201-226.
37: Nowak, R.M., 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World. 6th Edn., The John Hopkins University Press, London.
38: Odhiambo, C.O. and N.O. Oguge, 2003. Patterns of Rodent Pest Distribution in Maize Cropping System in the Kenyan Rift Valley. In: Rats, Mice and People: Rodent Biology and Management, Singleton, G.R., L.A. Hinds, C.J. Krebs and D.M. Spratt (Eds.). Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia pp: 217-220.
39: Schoener, T.W., 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat., 122: 240-285.
Direct Link |
40: Shenkut, M., A. Mebrate and M. Balakrishnan, 2006. Distribution and abundance of rodents in the farmlands: A case study in Alelltu Woreda, Ethiopia. Ethiopia J. Sci., 29: 63-70.
41: Sillero-Zubiri, C., F.M. Tattersall and D.W. Macdonald, 1995. Bale Mountains rodent communities and their relevance to the Ethiopian wolf (Canis Simensis). Afr. J. Ecol., 33: 301-320.
42: Taylor, K.D. and M.G. Green, 1976. The influences of rainfall on diet and reproduction in four African rodent species. J. Zool., 180: 367-389.
43: Tefera, Z., 2001. Common property resource management of an afro-alpine habitat: Supporting a population of a critically endangered Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis). Ph.D. Thesis, Durrel Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, UK.
44: Vaughan, J.A., J.M. Ryan and N.J. Czaplewsiki, 2000. Mammalogy. 4th Edn., Harcourt Inc., London, UK.
45: Yalden, D.W. and M.J. Largen, 1992. The endemic mammals of Ethiopia. Mammal Rev., 22: 115-150.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
46: Yalden, D.W.M., M.J. Largen and D. Kock, 1976. Catalogue of the mammals of ethiopia, 2. Insectivora and rodentia. Italian J. Zool., 8: 1-118.