Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References
Research Article
 
Prevalence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Riyadh During the Winter Season 2007-2008 and Different Risk Factors Impact



Fahad N. Al-Majhdi, A. Al-Jarallah, M. Elaeed, A. Latif, L. Gissmann and Haitham M. Amer
 
ABSTRACT

In the current study, two RT-PCR systems for detection (mono-specific) and typing (duplex) of RSV in clinical samples have been developed and validated. The two assays were exploited for studying the dissemination of RSV infection in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the winter season 2007/2008. Furthermore, the effect of certain risk factors, including gender, age and disease form, on extend and impact of the infection was analyzed. Of two hundreds collected samples, 70 (35%) were positive for RSV infection, among which 40 (57.1%) were type A and 30 (42.9%) were type B viruses. This investigation is the first that describes the existence of both RSV subtypes in co-ordinance in Saudi Arabia children, with slight dominance of type A viruses. By analyzing the effect of risk factors on the disease epidemiology we confirmed that males, patients at young age and asthmatics are more susceptible for RSV infection and disease progression.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Fahad N. Al-Majhdi, A. Al-Jarallah, M. Elaeed, A. Latif, L. Gissmann and Haitham M. Amer, 2009. Prevalence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Riyadh During the Winter Season 2007-2008 and Different Risk Factors Impact. International Journal of Virology, 5: 154-163.

DOI: 10.3923/ijv.2009.154.163

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijv.2009.154.163

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a single stranded, non-segmented RNA virus of negative-sense, which belongs to the Pneumovirinae subfamily of the Paramyxoviridae family, Order Mononegavirales (Riffault et al., 2006; Dimmock et al., 2007). It is recognized as the most frequent cause of severe lower respiratory tract infections in humans, particularly in young children, infants and immunocompromised individuals (Couch et al., 1997; Han et al., 1999; Falsey et al., 2005). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), RSV is responsible for approximately 64 million cases and 160,000 deaths every year worldwide. Respiratory syncytial virus infects more than 65% of infants during the first year of life and nearly all children experience one or more RSV infections by the end of the second year (Glezen et al., 1986). Hospitalization rates of infants are usually variable with the setting, with several developed countries having rates of 0.1-2% (Fisher et al., 1997). These rates tend to be significantly higher for children in lower socioeconomic groups and in developing countries (Boyce et al., 2000; Hoffman et al., 2004). Mortality due to RSV infection are usually uncommon but highly significant in infants suffering from chronic lung diseases and congenital heart disease reaching up to 40% (Kim et al., 1973; Fixler, 1996) in immunocompromised individuals it can reach 80-100% (Whimbey et al., 1996).

Respiratory syncytial virus has a single serotype with two distinct antigenic subgroups A and B identified by panels of monoclonal antibodies (Anderson et al., 1985; Mufson et al., 1985). Sequence analysis of representatives of the two subgroups showed that they share high nucleotide and amino acid identity with a considerable divergence among structural proteins like G, M2-2, SH and F (Johnson et al., 1987; Collins et al., 1990). Some studies suggest that subgroup A viruses are more virulent than subgroup B viruses and replicate to higher titers in the respiratory tract (Walsh et al., 1997). Nevertheless, viruses from both subgroups are usually co-circulating during an epidemic with an alternating pattern regarding the predominant subgroup every 1-2 years (Peret et al., 1998; White et al., 2005). Therefore, characterization and typing of the circulating RSV strains became a necessary tool for the epidemiological investigations, a matter that enables better disease control strategies (Barr et al., 2000).

Although, the effect of RSV infection in children is well understood, the need for accurate and reliable virus detection and typing methods is still an urgent issue. Culture methods are traditionally recognized as the gold standard for virus isolation and diagnosis, however they are not generally acceptable in every-day practice due to the required time, effort and costs (Welliver, 1988). Serological techniques such as direct immuno-fluorescence and antigen capture ELISA may provide quicker results but they lack the desired sensitivity and sometimes specificity (Johnson and Siegel, 1990; Kuypers et al., 2006). During the last two decades, molecular biology based-assays, particularly end-point and real-time PCR proved their ability to overcome these limitations and provided simple and high-throughput amenable tools in detection, typing and quantification of many respiratory viral agents including RSV (Osiowy, 1998; Falsey et al., 2002; Bellau-Pujol et al., 2005).

In the current study, two different RT-PCR systems were developed and optimized for detection (mono-specific) and typing (Duplex) of RSV in clinical samples. The developed assays were utilized in screening of 200 nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) collected from hospitalized children with acute respiratory tract infections in Riyadh, KSA. Different risk factors were analyzed for their influence in disease predisposition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens
Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected from 200 children aged from one month to three years and hospitalized with suspected acute respiratory tract infections during the period extended from late autumn of 2007 till spring of 2008. The aspirates were taken by trained nurses at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who inserted a sterile catheter into the nasal cavity of patients to a depth of 5-7 cm and drawn back while applying gentle suction using an electronic suction device (Heikkinen et al., 2002). Specimens were transported in Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) supplemented with 500 U penicillin and 500 μg streptomycin per mL to the Research Central Laboratory, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, where they processed, tested and stored at -80°C.

RNA Extraction
Viral RNA was isolated from fresh and frozen samples using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Each sample aliquot was used only once to avoid the loss of viral genomic material during repetitive freezing and thawing. The viral RNA extraction kit combines the selective binding properties of a silica gel membrane with the speed of microspin technology. The procedure was conducted utilizing 140 μL sample volumes according to the manufacturers instructions. Purified RNA was eluted from QIAamp columns in 60 μL elution buffer and stored at -20°C for use in mono-specific and duplex RT-PCR assays.

Primer Selection and Synthesis
The primers used for identification and typing of RSV strains were selected and optimized on the basis of GeneBank data of a wide variety of human RSV isolates. A primer pair that amplifies a 279 bp fragment of Nucleocapsid (N) gene of RSV was completely conserved for both RSV subtypes and used in mono-specific RT-PCR (Cane and Pringle, 1991). Two different primer sets were utilized for subtyping of RSV strains in a duplex RT-PCR: one for type A RSV that amplifies a 413 bp fragment of Fusion (F) gene and the other amplifies 149 bp fragment of the type B RSV N gene (Templeton et al., 2004) (Table 1).

First Strand Synthesis
The viral RNA extract was reverse transcribed using Sensiscript® Reverse transcription kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturers guidelines. A reaction mixture contained 5 μL of template RNA, 2 μL of 10x buffer RT, 2 μL of 5 mM dNTPs mix, 200 μM of random primers, 10 U of RNase inhibitor and 1 μL of sensiscript® Reverse Transcriptase was prepared and completed to 20 μL total reaction volume by RNase free water. The mixture was incubated for 60 min at 37°C and then cooled to 4°C till use in mono-specific or duplex PCR. The synthesized cDNA products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis for further confirmation.

Mono-Specific and Duplex PCR
Two RSV-specific PCR systems were developed and optimized in the current study: the first utilized universal N gene primers and aimed for detection of RSV infection in suspected samples (Mono-specific RSV-PCR), while the second utilized the two primer sets that identify subtypes A and B of RSV simultaneously in a single reaction tube (Duplex RSV-PCR). Both PCR reactions were set up using Multiplex PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with specific technical adaptations for ideal amplification results. A final reaction volume of 50 μL containing 25 μL of 2xQiagen Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 2 μM of each specific primer (universal N gene primers for mono-specific PCR and RSV-A and RSV-B primer sets for duplex PCR), 2 μL of the cDNA product and 21 μL of RNase free water was prepared for each sample.

Table 1:

Oligonucleotide primers for mono-specific and duplex RT-PCR

Sample tubes were incubated in a thermal cycler (Primus 96plus, MWG AG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) for one cycle at 95°C for 15 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 50°C for 90 sec and 72°C for 90 sec and finally one cycle of 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated in 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg mL-1 ethidium bromide and corresponding bands were identified as compared with 1 kbp DNA ladder (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) using an image analysis system (IMAGO Compact Imaging System, B and L, USA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Seasonal epidemics of RSV infection cost several thousands of lives throughout the world every year, primarily among children with underlying cardiac, pulmonary and immunologic disorders (De Vincenzo, 2007). A wide range of risk factors either predispose or complicate the infection status including age, gender, premature birth, passive smoking, lack of pure breast feeding, disease form and medical history of respiratory diseases and allergy (Welliver, 1988; Meqdam and Subiah, 2006).

In Saudi Arabia, only few reports described the prevalence of RSV infection in sporadic districts of the kingdom including Riyadh, Al-Quassim and Abha (Jamjoom et al., 1993; Bakir et al., 1998; Al-Hajjar et al., 1998; Al-Shehri et al., 2006; Meqdam and Subiah, 2006). These reports covered short periods of time extending from 1991-1996 and 2003-2004. From these available data it appears that RSV is the main causative organism involved in acute respiratory tract infections and hospitalization of young children in Saudi Arabia with an incidence range of 28.5-54%. However, the use of serological and virological assays of limited specificity and sensitivity may impact the validity of these results. Currently, we are lacking important information regarding the situation of RSV infection, the predominant subtypes and impact of different risk factors on the disease status. No virus isolate is available for characterization and vaccine preparation.

Since, RSV infection is highly contagious and usually requires hospitalization, rapid and accurate diagnosis of the virus infection is very important for preventing nosocomial infections, a matter that profoundly decreases extent and severity of the infection in a community (Mlinaric-Galinovic et al., 1996; Deiman et al., 2007). Moreover, it enables the application of appropriate patient management, control measures and helps to avoid the unnecessary use of antibiotics (Wilson et al., 2002; Slinger et al., 2004; Kafetzis, 2004).

With the advance of molecular biology and development of more specific and sensitive techniques to test for viral pathogens, especially PCR, it is now possible to examine the prevalence of different viruses implicating in respiratory tract infection more accurately (Kitchin, 1990; Nadder and Langly, 2001; Espey et al., 2006). Therefore, in the current study we optimized a standard two-step RT-PCR assay for direct diagnosis of RSV in clinical samples. Despite the preference of single-step RT-PCR in routine diagnostic approaches (handling errors, contamination risks and work load issues are significantly decreased) the two-step RT-PCR offers better flexibility and quality control potential. In addition, lower primer-dimer formation and availability of more stable cDNA libraries for sample archiving and epidemiological studies are major advantages of the two-step approach (Vandesompele et al., 2002).

The developed RT-PCR assay makes use of a primer set that amplifies a fragment of 279 bp in the nucleocapsid gene sequence (Fig. 1). The potential of the N gene for development of such an assay relies on the sequence conservation and high level of expression accounting for better sensitivity and specificity (Cane and Pringle, 1991; O`Shea and Canea, 2004; Yamada et al., 2004; Dewhurst-Maridor et al., 2004).


Fig. 1: Mono-specific RT-PCR products of selected NPA samples for detection of HRSV as shown by agarose gel electrophoresis: Lane M represents 1 kbp DNA molecular weight ladder plus, Invitrogen; Lanes 5, 7 and 10 show positive amplification of a 279 bp fragment of HRSV-N gene sequence and Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 show negative results

To further investigate the specificity of the assay, different human respiratory viral agents were tested in parallel. No cross-reactivity could be observed for Influenza A and B viruses, Parinfluenza-2 and 3, Human Metapneumoviruses and Measles virus, indicating that the assay was specific for RSV.

Respiratory syncytial virus subtypes A and B occur either simultaneously or alternate during the annual epidemics of RSV infection (Papadopoulos et al., 2004). The available information concerning the clinical severity, the geographical distribution and the chronology of either subtype is still controversial (Walsh et al., 1997; White et al., 2005). Typing of RSV-positive samples on temporal and spatial bases will shed more light on the epidemiology of RSV infection and consequently enable the design of comprehensive and long-term control strategies. Therefore, we developed a duplex RT-PCR assay for the detection of both RSV subtypes, using primer pairs that specifically differentiate between type A and B viruses (Fig. 2). The sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the assay was evaluated and confirmed by the standard means.

For studying the prevalence of RSV in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during the winter season of 2007-2008 and implication of some risk factors (e.g., gender, age and disease form) on the infection status, we further exploited the aptitude of the two developed RT-PCR systems for detection and typing of RSV in clinical samples. Since, conduction of a investigation that covers all of Riyadh city proved to be too difficult, we focused on the collection of samples from children registered at King Khalid University Hospital, which is an educational hospital that accepts patients from the whole Riyadh city and many nearby districts. Of 200 tested NPA samples, 70 were positive for RSV infection (35%) (Table 2). This ratio is well in line with other studies that identify RSV as the main causative agent in at least one quarter of respiratory infection cases of hospitalized children in Saudi Arabia and worldwide (Holberg et al., 1991; Bakir et al., 1998; Al-Hajjar et al., 1998; Al-Shehri et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2003; Mentel et al., 2005).

Typing of the positive samples using duplex RT-PCR indicated that 57.1% were type A viruses and 42.9% were type B. These results validate the implication of both virus subtypes in RSV infection of Saudi Arabia children during the winter season 2007-2008 with a slight dominance of type A viruses. No distinct association between the virus subtype and clinical outcome could be observed from our data, since, both subtypes were identified in cases of different disease categories with comparable ratio.

Fig. 2:

Duplex RT-PCR products of four selected RSV-positive NPA samples using two primer sets that identify types A and B viruses simultaneously, shown by agarose gel electrophoresis: Lane M represents 1 Kbp DNA molecular weight marker; Lanes 1 and 2: type B RSV viruses lanes 3 and 4: type A RSV viruses


Table 2:

Influence of different risk factors (Gender, age and disease form) on the prevalence of RSV and its major subtypes in hospitalized children under study

*No.: Number, **RTI: Respiratory tract infection

The study was also designed to evaluate the effect of different risk factors like gender, age and disease form on the extent and impact of RSV infection in Saudi Arabia children. For accomplishing such purpose, the samples used in this study were collected in a balanced manner concerning each of these risk factors. The only exception was the disease form category which includes higher frequency of patients with lower respiratory tract infection since most of the hospitalized children are basically suffering form bronchiolitis and/or pneumonia.

Regarding the gender risk factor, the results obtained delineate that male patients (No. = 38/102; 38.7%) are at a slightly higher risk than female patients (No. = 32/98; 31.3%), which appears in agreement with many previous investigations (Wang and Law, 1998; Iwane et al., 2004; Gerna et al., 2008). This phenomenon was explained by Meissner (2003) in which they indicated that the airways of young males are shorter and narrower than those of young females leading to a worse evolution of the disease. Male being of higher risk applies for both virus subtypes A and B (Table 2).

Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection is usually associated with children younger than 5 years and particularly younger than one year (Wang and Law, 1998). The age-distribution of RSV illness appears similar throughout the world; however, there is no documented data demonstrating such similarity in Saudi Arabia children. In this study, we grouped the samples into four main age groups: 0-6 months; 6-12 months; 1-2 years and 2-3 years. The results showed that 70% of the RSV-positive samples were collected from children younger than one year and then the incidence decreases by developing in age (18.6% during the second year and 11.4% during the third year). The same situation exists for both subtypes A and B with significant higher preference of type B to less younger ages.

Although, RSV is associated with all aspects of respiratory tract illness in children, it is highly incriminated in most Lower Respiratory Tract (LRT) affections as well as wheezing and asthma (Kim et al., 1973). In the present study, the relative implication of RSV in LRT illness (28.5%) was expected and nearly identical to the international rates (Holberg et al., 1991). However, the remarkable observation is the significant higher ratio of RSV-positive samples in asthmatic patients (73.3%). This supports the idea that RSV is the predominant pathogen involved in wheezing and asthma among children in preschool age (Lopez-Perez et al., 2009). On the other hand, we cannot conclude that the increased positive reactivity of the samples collected from patients with Upper Respiratory Tract (URT) affections (47%) has any significant value since UTR affected patients rarely underwent hospitalization and number of test samples were really restrictive (Table 2).

In conclusion, the present study exploited two RT-PCR systems for detection and typing of RSV in 200 clinical samples collected from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the Winter season 2007-2008. Both RSV types were detected in the test samples with slight dominance of type A. Risk factors including male gender, young age (less than one year) and asthma may have the potential that favors RSV infection in Saudi Arabia children. Further utilization of the developed assays in tracking the RSV infected cases on spatial and temporal bases will provide significant information about the virus infection, disease progression and spread.

REFERENCES
Al-Hajjar, S., J. Akhter, S. Al-Jumaahand H. Qadri, 1998. Respiratory viruses in children attending a major referral centre in Saudi Arabia. Ann. Trop. Paediatr., 18: 87-92.
Direct Link  |  

Al-Shehri, M.A., A. Sadeq, and K. Quli, 2006. Bronchiolitis in Abha, Southwest Saudi Arabia: Viral etiology and predictors for hospital admission. West. Afr. J. Med., 24: 299-304.
Direct Link  |  

Anderson, L.J., J.C. Hierholzer, C. Tsou, R.M. Hendry, B.F. Fernie, Y. Stone and K. McIntosh, 1985. Antigenic characterization of respiratory syncytial virus strains with monoclonal antibodies. J. Infect. Dis., 151: 626-633.

Bakir, T.M., M. Halawani and S. Ramia, 1998. Viral aetiology and epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in hospitalized Saudi children. J. Trop. Pediatr., 44: 100-103.
Direct Link  |  

Barr, F.E., N.R. Patel and C.J. Newth, 2000. The pharmacologic mechanism by which inhaled epinephrine reduces airway obstruction in respiratory syncytial virus-associated bronchiolitis. J. Pediatr., 136: 699-700.
Direct Link  |  

Bellau-Pujol, S., A. Vabret, L. Legrand, J. Dina and S. Gouarin et al., 2005. Development of three multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of 12 respiratory RNA viruses. J. Virol. Methods, 126: 53-63.
CrossRef  |  

Boyce, T.G., B.G. Mellen, E.F. Mitchel, P.F. Wright and M.R. Griffin, 2000. Rates of hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection among children in Medicaid. J. Pediatr., 137: 865-870.
CrossRef  |  

Cane, P.A. and C.R. Pringle, 1991. Respiratory syncytial virus heterogeneity during an epidemic: Analysis by limited nucleotide sequencing (SH gene) and restriction mapping (N gene). J. Gen. Virol., 72: 349-357.
CrossRef  |  

Collins, P.L., R.A. Olmsted and P.R. Johnson, 1990. The small hydrophobic protein of human respiratory syncytial virus: Comparison between antigenic subgroups A and B. J. Gen. Virol., 71: 1571-1576.
Direct Link  |  

Couch, R.B., J.A. Englund and E. Whimbey, 1997. Respiratory viral infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. Am. J. Med., 102: 2-9.
Direct Link  |  

De Vincenzo, J.P., 2007. A new direction in understanding the pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis: How real infants suffer. J. Infect. Dis., 195: 1084-1086.

Deiman, B., C. Schrover, C. Mooreb, D. Westmoreland and P. van-de-Wiel, 2007. Rapid and highly sensitive qualitative real-time assay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus A and B using NASBA and molecular beacon technology. J. Virol. Meth., 146: 29-35.
CrossRef  |  

Dewhurst-Maridor G., V. Simonet, J.E. Bornand, L.P. Nicod and J.C. Pache, 2004. Development of a quantitative TaqMan RT-PCR for respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. Meth., 120: 41-49.
CrossRef  |  

Dimmock, N.J., A.J. Easton and K.N. Leppard, 2007. Introduction to Modern Virology. 6th Edn., Blackwell Publishing, USA.

Espy, M.J., J.R. Uhl, L.M. Sloan, S.P. Buckwalter and M.F. Jones et al., 2006. Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: Applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 19: 165-256.
CrossRef  |  

Falsey A.R., P.A. Hennessey, M.A. Formica, C. Cox and E.E. Walsh, 2005. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N. Engl. J. Med., 352: 1749-1759.
Direct Link  |  

Falsey, A.R., M.A. Formica and E.E. Walsh, 2002. Diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection: Comparison of reverse transcription-PCR to viral culture and serology in adults with respiratory illness. J. Clin. Microbiol., 40: 817-820.

Fisher, R.G., W.C. Gruber, K.M. Edwards, G.W. Reed and S.J. Tollefson et al., 1997. Twenty years of outpatient respiratory syncytial virus infection: A framework for vaccine efficacy trials. Pediatrics, 99: E7-E7.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Fixler, D.E., 1996. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in children with congenital heart disease: A review. Pediatr. Cardiol., 17: 163-168.
CrossRef  |  

Gerna, G., G. Campanini, V. Rognoni, A. Marchi, F. Rovida, A. Piralla and E. Percivalle, 2008. Correlation of viral load as determined by real-time RT-PCR and clinical characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections in early infancy. J. Clin. Virol., 41: 45-48.
CrossRef  |  

Glezen, W.P., L.H. Taber, A.L. Frank and J.A. Kasel, 1986. Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus. Am. J. Dis. Child, 140: 543-546.

Han, L.L., J.P. Alexander and L.J. Anderson, 1999. Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia among the elderly: An assessment of disease burden. J. Infect. Dis., 179: 25-30.
Direct Link  |  

Heikkinen, T., J. Marttila, A. Salmi and O. Ruuskanen, 2002. Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol., 40: 4337-4339.
Direct Link  |  

Hoffman, S.J., F.R. Laham and F.P. Polack, 2004. Mechanisms of illness during respiratory syncytial virus infection: The lungs, the virus and the immune response. Microbes. Infect., 6: 767-772.
CrossRef  |  

Holberg, C.J., A.L. Wright, F.D. Martinez, C.G. Ray, L.M. Taussig and M.D. Lebowitz, 1991. Risk factors for respiratory syncytial virus-associated lower respiratory illnesses in the first year of life. Am. J. Epidemiol., 133: 1135-1151.
Direct Link  |  

Hu, A., M. Colella, J.S. Tam, R. Rappaport and S.M. Cheng, 2003. Simultaneous detection, subgrouping, and quantitation of respiratory syncytial virus A and B by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol., 41: 149-154.
Direct Link  |  

Iwane, M.K., K.M. Edwards, P.G. Szilagyi, M.P.H. Frances and J. Walker et al., 2004. Population-based surveillance for hospitalizations associated with respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, and Parainfluenza viruses among young children. Pediatrics, 113: 1758-1764.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Jamjoom, G.A., A.M. Al-Semrani, A. Board, A.R. Al-Frayh, F. Artz and K.F. Al-Mobaireek, 1993. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children hospitalized with respiratory illness in Riyadh. J. Trop. Pediatr., 39: 346-349.
Direct Link  |  

Johnson, P.R., M.K. Spriggs, R.A. Olmsted and P.L. Collins, 1987. The G glycoprotein of human respiratory syncytial viruses of subgroups A and B: Extensive sequence divergence between antigenically related proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 84: 5625-5629.
Direct Link  |  

Johnston, S.L. and C.S. Siegel, 1990. Evaluation of direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, centrifugation culture and conventional culture for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Clin. Microbiol., 28: 2394-2397.
Direct Link  |  

Kafetzis, D.A., 2004. Prophylaxis, therapy and prevention of viral respiratory infections. Paediatr. Resp. Rev., 5: S185-S189.

Kim, H.W., J.O. Arrobio, C.D. Brandt, B.C. Jeffries and G. Pyleset al., 1973. Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus infection in Washington, D.C. I. Importance of the virus in different respiratory tract disease syndromes and temporal distribution of infection. Am. J. Epidemiol., 98: 216-225.
Direct Link  |  

Kitchin, P.A., 1990. Clinical applications of the polymerase chain reaction. Int. J. Stud. AIDS, 1: 161-173.

Kuypers, J., N. Wright, J. Ferrenberg, M.L. Huang, A. Cent, L. Corey and R. Morrow, 2006. Comparison of real-time PCR assays with fluorescent antibody assays for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children. J. Clin. Microbiol., 44: 2382-2388.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lopez Perez, G., B.M. Morfin Maciel, N. Navarrete and A Aguirre, 2009. Identification of influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus and respiratory syncytial virus during rhinopharyngitis in a group of Mexican children with asthma and wheezing. Rev. Alerg. Mex., 56: 86-91.

Meissner, H.C., 2003. Selected populations at increased risk from respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 22: S40-S45.

Mentel, R., U. Ilgert, U. Wegner, K. Zimmermann, R. Bruns and L. Gurtler, 2005. Molecular and clinical characteristics of respiratory syncytial virus infections in hospitalized children. Med. Microbiol. Immunol., 194: 67-71.
CrossRef  |  

Meqdam, M.M. and S.H. Subaih, 2006. Rapid detectionand clinical features of infants and young children with acute lower respiratory tract infection due to respiratory syncytial virus. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., 47: 129-133.
CrossRef  |  

Mlinaric-Galinovic, G., A.R. Falsey and E.E. Walsh, 1996. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in the elderly. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 15: 777-781.
CrossRef  |  

Mufson, M., C. Orvell, B. Rafnar and E. Norrby, 1985. Two distinct subtypes of human respiratory syncytial virus. J. Gen. Virol., 66: 2111-2124.
Direct Link  |  

Nadder, T.S. and M.R. Langley, 2001. The new millennium laboratory: Molecular diagnostics goes clinical. Clin. Lab. Sci., 14: 252-259.
Direct Link  |  

O'Shea, M.K. and P.A. Canea, 2004. Development of a highly sensitive semi-quantitative real-time PCR and molecular beacon probe assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. Method., 118: 101-110.
CrossRef  |  

Osiowy, C., 1998. Direct detection of respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus in clinical respiratory specimens by a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 3149-3154.
Direct Link  |  

Papadopoulos, N., D. Gourgiotis, A. Javadyan, A. Bossios and K. Kallergi et al., 2004. Does respiratory syncytial virus subtype influences the severity of acute bronchiolitis in hospitalized infants?. Resp. Med., 98: 879-882.
CrossRef  |  

Peret, T.C., C.B. Hall, K.C. Schnabel, J.A. Golub and L.J. Anderson, 1998. Circulation patterns of genetically distinct group A and B strains of human respiratory syncytial virus in a community. J. Gen. Virol., 79: 2221-2229.
Direct Link  |  

Riffault, S., C. Dubuquoy, N. Castagne, E. Baranowski, B. Charley and J.F. Eleouet, 2006. Replication of Bovine respiratory syncytial virus in murine cells depends on type I interferon-receptor functionality. J. Gen. Virol., 87: 2145-2148.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Slinger, R., R. Milk, I. Gaboury and F. Diaz-Mitoma, 2004. Evaluation of the QuickLab RSV test, a new rapid lateral-flow immunoassay for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42: 3731-3733.
Direct Link  |  

Templeton, K.E., S.A. Scheltinga, M.F. Beersma, Kroes, A.C. and E.C.Claas, 2004. Rapid and sensitive method using multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosis of infections by influenza a and influenza B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3 and 4. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42: 1564-1569.
Direct Link  |  

Vandesompele, J., A. De Paepe and F. Speleman, 2002. Elimination of primer-dimer artifacts and genomic co-amplification using a two-step SYBR green-I real-time RT-PCR. Anal. Biochem., 303: 95-98.
CrossRef  |  

Walsh, E.E., K.M. McConnochie, C.E. Long and C.B. Hall, 1997. Severity of respiratory syncytial virus infection is related to virus strain. J. Infect. Dis., 175: 814-820.
Direct Link  |  

Wang, E.E. and B.J. Law, 1998. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in pediatric patients. Sem. Pediatr. Infect. Dis., 9: 146-153.

Welliver, R.C., 1988. Detection, pathogenesis and therapy of respiratory syncytial virus infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1: 27-39.
Direct Link  |  

Whimbey, E., R.E. Champlin, R.B. Couch, J.A. Englund and J.M. Goodrich et al., 1996. Community respiratory virus infections among hospitalized adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis., 22: 778-782.

White, L.J., M. Waris, P.A. Cane, D.J. Nokes and G.F. Medley, 2005. The transmission dynamics of groups A and B human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) in England and Wales and Finland: Seasonality and cross-protection. Epidemiol. Infect., 133: 279-289.
CrossRef  |  

Wilson, S.D., B.B. Dahl and R.D. Wells, 2002. An evidence-based clinical pathway for bronchiolitis safely reduces antibiotic overuse. Am. J. Med. Qual., 17: 195-199.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yamada, A., L. Lama and J.S. Tam, 2004. Typing and subtyping of influenza viruses and respiratory syncytial viruses by multiplex RT-PCR. Intl. Congr. Ser., 1263: 381-385.
CrossRef  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract