Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Potential of Insect Vector Screening Method for Development of Durable Resistant Cultivars to Rice yellow mottle virus Disease



Y. Sere, A. Onasanya, F.E. Nwilene, M.E. Abo and K. Akator
 
ABSTRACT

The study aimed to investigate the potential of insect vector Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) cultivar screening method. Screening rice cultivars against RYMV under artificial conditions is usually carried out inside the screen house by mechanical inoculation of RYMV isolates. Such an approach may be highly criticized as not fully representative of how RYMV disease is spread or transmitted under field conditions. Consequently, the potential of three RYMV insect vectors, Oxya hyla, Locris rubra and Chnootriba similes, was evaluated in comparing the cultivar screening method with mechanical transmission using eight differential rice genotypes against a highly virulent RYMV Nigerian isolate. The study revealed that each of the three insect vector methods is different from the mechanical transmission method and all methods screened rice cultivars in the same way. This study revealed the potential of the insect vector screening method to provide a basis not only for the development of durable resistant cultivars to RYMV disease but also for further investigation on vectors, virus and rice plants interaction.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Y. Sere, A. Onasanya, F.E. Nwilene, M.E. Abo and K. Akator, 2008. Potential of Insect Vector Screening Method for Development of Durable Resistant Cultivars to Rice yellow mottle virus Disease. International Journal of Virology, 4: 41-47.

DOI: 10.3923/ijv.2008.41.47

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijv.2008.41.47

INTRODUCTION

Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV), genus sobemovirus, remains one of the major constraints to rice production in rainfed lowland and irrigated ecosystems in Africa. The virus is now found in most parts of Africa (Séré et al., 2008) with host range being restricted to gramineous species, mainly in the genus Oryzae and Eragrostidae. RYMV is mechanically transmissible and insect vectors play a major role in its transmission (Abo et al., 2000a). The regular occurrence of insects in rice fields in West Africa has prompted close examination of these species as possible vectors (Nwilene, 1999). Chaetocnema pulla, Dicladispa gestroi, Trichispa sericea and Sessilia pusilla are some of the important vectors of RYMV (Abo et al., 1998). Chaetocnema abyssinica, C. kenyensis and C. pallidipes are also capable of transmitting the disease.

Resistant varieties are the main component of an integrated management system for RYMV. Screening rice cultivars against RYMV under artificial conditions is usually carried out by mechanical inoculation of RYMV isolates into the plant tissues and allowing the inoculated young plant to grow on so that RYMV disease symptom scores and serological diagnostic tests can be conducted at least 14 days after viral inoculation (Onasanya et al., 2004, 2006). Such an approach is open to criticism as not being fully representative of how RYMV disease is spread or transmitted under field conditions where the insects play an important role in initiating disease transferred from infected weeds or wild rice surrounding farmers` fields.

The study aimed to investigate the potential of insect vector RYMV cultivar screening method. In line with the study objective, insect vector transmission was investigated in comparison with the mechanical inoculation method to establish if a method of viral transmission or inoculation by insect vectors could be as effective and reliable as the mechanical inoculation method for screening rice cultivars for RYMV resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rice Genotypes
Eight differential rice genotypes (Table 1) used in this study were obtained from the WARDA Plant Pathology Unit.

RYMV Isolate
The highly virulent Nigerian isolate of RYMV used for this study was first propagated in the susceptible rice variety BG 90-2 following mechanical inoculation of 21-day-old rice seedlings in the screenhouse at the WARDA Nigeria Station, Ibadan, Nigeria. Four weeks after inoculation, leaves bearing typical yellow mottle symptoms were harvested and used to prepare the viral inoculum. The viral inoculum was prepared by grinding the RYMV-infected leaf samples in 0.01 M phosphate buffer pH 7.0 at the ratio of 1:10 (w/v) and the resulting homogenate filtered through cheesecloth. Carborundum powder (600 mesh) was added to the inoculum to aid the penetration of the virus into leaf tissues during mechanical inoculation.

Insect Vector RYMV Inoculation
The study was conducted inside the screenhouse between 2006 and 2007 at the WARDA Nigeria Station, Ibadan, Nigeria. For the infected row, BG 90-2, a RYMV susceptible variety, was first sown in 5 L plastic pots at 1 m distance from test entries. The rice seedlings in the infected row were mechanically inoculated with a highly virulent RYMV Nigerian isolate 14 days after sowing and 7 days later, the test entries (Table 1) were sown in 5 L plastic pots. Insect vectors were introduced into the screenhouse on the development of the first symptoms at 14 days after mechanical inoculation to allow them to feed on the infected row of rice plants. One species of insect vector per experiment was used and a total of three species (Oxya hyla, Locris rubra and Chnootriba similis) were tested. In another experiments 14-days-old test entries of rice seedlings were mechanically inoculated with the same RYMV isolate while controls were not inoculated. Each of the experiments was laid down on a RCB design with three replications, each in a separate insect-proof screenhouse.

Data Collection
At 56 days after the introduction of the insect vector, chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD 502 Chlorophyll Meter (Monje and Bugbee, 1992; Martines and Guiamet, 2004), Disease Incidence (DI) was evaluated according to Onasanya et al. (2004) and Viral Content (VC) was determined using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Séré et al., 2007). SPAD measurement and viral contain were obtained both for test and control genotypes.

Table 1: Identity of differential rice genotypes used

Data Analysis
Based on the SPAD readings and viral content, the percentages of SPAD reduction and viral increase were calculated. IRRISTAT statistical software was used for all the analyses. Variance and mean comparison of percentage disease incidence, viral content and SPAD reductions were performed. Potential of RYMV cultivar screening fitness of the three insect vectors (Oxya hyla, Locris rubra and Chnootriba similes) and mechanical methods was plotted using regression analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The comparison between the classical mechanical screening method and the potential method of screening with RYMV vectors (Oxya hyla, Locris rubra and Chnootriba similes) was done using a highly virulent RYMV Nigerian isolate against eight differential rice genotypes. Comparing each insect vector`s potential to the classical mechanical method, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant interaction between both methods thereby indicating that the three insect vectors (O. hyla, L. rubra and C. similes) used in this study screened rice cultivars in the same way in terms of disease incidence, plant chlorophyll reduction (SPADR) and Viral Content (VC) (Table 2).

The ANOVA also revealed that for each of the three insect vectors the method was different from mechanical transmission method (Table 2). For example, L. rubra and C. similis gave higher DI (74.2 and 69%), SPADR (35.1 and 36.5%) and VC (12.5 and 9.5%), with fitness above 65% than was obtained using the mechanical method to screen the eight genotypes (Table 3-5, Fig. 1).

The study revealed that O. hyla, was able to transmit higher viral content into the eight rice genotypes than did the mechanical inoculation method, but virus pathogenicity is reduced which results in lower incidence of plant disease and chlorophyll reductions than with mechanical transmission.

The high disease incidence, chlorophyll reduction and viral content across the eight differential rice genotypes due to RYMV transmitted by L. rubra and C. similis strongly revealed the potential and possible use of these vectors in screening rice genotypes for RYMV resistance. However, the behavior of the rice genotypes tested indicated that the differences between the insect vector method and the classical mechanical inoculation are significant for some varieties and not for others (Table 3-5).

Virus transmission by insects is a common way for viruses to travel between different host plants and this is possibly as a result of a protein that plant viruses attach to as they hitch an insect ride between plants (Uzest et al., 2007). Protocols for the whitefly transmission test (Brown and Nelson, 1988) have also been used for cultivar screening. Studying interaction between virus and insect vectors, the authors reported a case of dose virus effect. Similar approaches have been used to screen cultivars for resistance to Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) aphid transmission (Blanc et al., 1993), Maize chlorotic dwarf virus (MCDV) leafhopper transmission in maize (Gingery et al., 2004) and Maize streak virus (MSV) Cicadulina mbila and Cicadulina storeyi transmission in maize (Reynaud and Peterschmitt, 1992; Sunday, 2006). Variable virus transmission efficiency by vector species has been demonstrated. For instance, Frankliniella schultzei was more efficient in transmitting Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) than Scirtotrips dorsalis (Amin et al., 1981). Burrow et al. (2006) indicated that the difference between populations in their ability to transmit virus was demonstrated for the first time with Ciccadiluna mbila and the Maize streak virus. Gray et al. (2002) indicated that clonal populations of Schizaphis graminum, a vector of Barley yellow dwarf virus, can differ in their ability to transmit viruses. However, there is no available information or report on using insect vectors to screen against RYMV. Studies carried out by Abo et al. (1998, 2000a, 2000b) to understand the epidemiology of the disease concentrated on feeding insects on diseased rice plants where the insects collect the virus and then pass it on to the next healthy plants on which they feed.

Table 2:

Analysis of variance comparing each insect vector with mechanical viral transmission for percentage RYMV Disease Incidence (DI), SPAD reduction (SPADR) and Viral Content (VC)

**Significant at 1% level; *Significant at 5% level; ns = Not significant

Table 3:

Comparison, for each variety screened, of the difference between the classical mechanical method (CM) and the method using Chnootriba similis (CS) as vectors

(1)Diff = Differences; **Significant at 1% level; *Significant at 5% level; ns = Not significant


Table 4:

Comparison, for each variety screened, of the difference between the classical mechanical method (CM) and the method using Locris rubra (LR) as vectors

(1)Diff = Differences; **Significant at 1% level; *Significant at 5% level; ns = Not significant


Table 5:

Comparison, for each variety screened, of the difference between the classical mechanical method (CM) and the method using Oxyla hyla (OH) as vectors

(1)Diff = Differences; **Significant at 1% level; *Significant at 5% level; ns = Not significant


Fig. 1:

Comparing the potential fitness of four different RYMV inoculation methods for screening eight differential rice genotypes M=Mechanical; CS= Chnootriba similes; OH= Oxya hyla; LR.= Locris rubra % RYMV disease by genotype

The potential to use insect vectors to screen rice varieties for resistance/tolerance to RYMV was reported for the first time in the present study. The study has also revealed the vectoral capacity of insects found in and around rice fields. This insect vector role has seriously hindered progress towards controlling the disease.

Following the RYMV epidemic outbreak of the 1990s, research activities focused on the population structure of the virus (Konaté et al., 1997; N`Guessan et al., 2000; Fargette et al., 2004, 2008; Traoré et al., 2005; Sorho et al., 2005) and the resistance of rice varieties (Pressoir et al., 1998; Ndjiondjop et al., 2001; Albar et al., 2003; Ioannidou et al., 2003). They provided a good understanding on the relationship between the virus and the rice plant. However, no investigation was undertaken on the interaction between the virus, the vectors and rice plants. There is a need to investigate the population diversity of the RYMV vectors in order to determine its contribution to virus spread in farmers` fields. Some questions remain to be clarified. Are there significant differences between RYMV vectors of the same species and biotypes to transmit RYMV disease? Is there any resistance/tolerance in rice plants against the insect vector species and/or biotypes? Such questions are important not only to improving the utilization of vectors to screen rice varieties but also to better understand the disease epidemic in farmers` fields and make progress in controlling the disease.

CONCLUSION

The present study was able to provide information on the potential of screening for RYMV using insect vectors and this could provide the basis for investigating the relationship between different vectors, the virus and the rice plants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are very grateful to the Government of Japan (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) for providing funds for this research. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mr. Bayo Kehinde for technical support and Mr. David Millar for editing the manuscript.

REFERENCES
Abo, M.E., A.A. Sy and M.D. Alegbejo, 1998. Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) in Africa: Evolution, distribution, economic significance on sustainable rice production and management strategies. J. Sustainable Agric., 11: 85-111.
Direct Link  |  

Abo, M.E., M.D. Alegbejo and A.A. Sy, 2000. The insect vectors of rice yellow mottle virus: Their mode of transmission and feeding effect on rice. ESN Occasional Publ., 32: 83-90.

Abo, M.E., M.D. Alegbejo, A.A. Sy and S.M. Misari, 2000. An overview of the mode of transmission, host plants and methods of detection of Rice yellow mottle virus. J. Sustain. Agric., 17: 19-36.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Albar, L., M.N. Ndjiondjop, Z. Esshak, A. Berger and A. Pinel et al., 2003. Fine genetic mapping of a gene required for rice yellow mottle virus cell-to-cell movement. Theor. Applied Genet., 107: 371-378.
Direct Link  |  

Amin, P.W., D.V.R. Reddy, A.M. Ghanekar and M.I. Reddy, 1981. Transmission of tomato spotted wilt virus, the causal agent of bud necroisis of peanut by Scirtotrips dorsalis and Frankliniella schultzei. Plant Dis., 65: 663-665.

Blanc, S., I.G. Schmidt, P. Kuhl, G. Esperandieu, R. Lebeurier, M. Cerutti Hull and C. Louis, 1993. Paracrystalline structure of Cauliflower mosaic-virus aphid transmission factor produced both in plant and in as heterologous system and relationship with a solubilized active form. Virology, 197: 283-292.
Direct Link  |  

Brown, J.K and M.R. Nelson, 1988. Transmission, host range and virus-vector relationships of Chino del tomato virus (CdTV), a whitefly-transmitted geminivirus from Sinaloa, Mexico. Plant Dis., 72: 866-869.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Burrow, M.E., M.C. Caillaud, D.M. Smith, E.M. Benson, F.E. Gildow and S.M. Gray, 2006. Genetic regulation of poliovirus and luteovirus transmission in the aphid Scizaphis graminum. Phytopathology, 96: 828-837.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Fargette, D., A. Pinel, M. Rakotomalala, E. Sangu and O. Traore et al., 2008. Rice yellow mottle virus, an RNA plant virus, evolves as rapidly as most rna animal viruses. J. Virol., 12: 3584-3589.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Fargette, D., A. Pinel, Z. Abubakar, O.Z. Traore and C. Brugidou et al., 2004. Inferring the evolutionary history of rice yellow mottle virus from genomic, phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies. J. Virol., 78: 3252-3261.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Gingery, R.E., R.J. Anderson and M.G. Redinbaugh, 2004. Effect of environmental conditions and leafhopper gender on Maize chlorotic dwarf virus transmission by graminella nigrifrons. J. Econ. Ento., 97: 768-773.
Direct Link  |  

Gray, S.M., D. Smith, L. Barbierri and J. Burd, 2002. Virus transmission phenotype is correlated with host adaptation among genetically diverse populations of the Aphid Scizaphis graminum. Phytopathology, 92: 970-975.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ioannidou, D., A. Pinel, C. Brugidou, L. Albar and N. Ahmadi et al., 2003. Characterisation of the effects of a major QTL of the partial resistance to rice yellow mottle virus using a near-isogenic line approach. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 63: 213-221.
CrossRef  |  

Konate, G., O. Traore and M. Coulibaly, 1997. Characterization of rice yellow mottle virus isolates in Sudano-Sahalian areas. Arch. Virol., 142: 1117-1124.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Martines, D.E. and J.J. Guiamet, 2004. Distortion of the SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter readings by changes in irradiance and leaf water status. Agronomie, 24: 41-46.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Monje, O.A. and B. Bugbee, 1992. Inherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters: A comparison of two types of meters. Hortic. Sci., 27: 69-71.
Direct Link  |  

N'Guessan, P., A. Pinel, M. Caruana, R. Frutos, A. Sy, A. Ghesquiere and D. Fargette, 2000. Evidence of the presence of two serotypes of rice yellow mottle Sobemovirus in Cote d'Ivoire. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 106: 167-178.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ndjiondjop, M.N., C. Brugidou, Z. Shipping, D. Fargette, A. Ghesquire and C.M. Fauquet, 2001. High resistance to Rice yellow mottle virus in two cultivated rice cultivars is correlated with the failure of cell-to-cell movement. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 59: 309-316.
CrossRef  |  

Nwilene, F.E., 1999. Current status and management of insect vectors of Rice Yellow Mottle Virus (RYMV) in Africa. Insect. Sci. Applied, 19: 179-185.
CrossRef  |  

Oluwafemi, S., 2006. Genetic variation among active and inactive transmitters of Maize streak virus within a population of Cicadulina storeyi China (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 5: 590-596.
Direct Link  |  

Onasanya, A., Y. Sere, F. Nwilene, M.E. Abo and K. Akator, 2004. Reactions and resistance status of differential rice genotypes to Rice yellow mottle virus, genus Sobemovirus in Cote d'Ivoire. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 718-723.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Onasanya, A., Y. Sere, M. Sie, K. Akator, M. M. Coulibaly and A. Hamadoun, 2006. Existence of two pathotypes of rice yellow mottle virus, genus Sobemovirus, in Mali. Plant Pathol. J., 5: 368-372.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Pressoir, G., L. Albar, N. Ahmadi, I. Rimbault, M. Lorieux, D. Fargette and A. Ghesquière, 1998. Genetic basis and mapping of the resistance to rice yellow mottle virus. II. Evidence of a complementary epistasis between two QTLs. Theor. Applied Genet., 97: 1155-1161.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Reynaud, B. and M. Peterschmitt, 1992. A study of the mode of transmission of Maize streak virus by Cicadulina mbila using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Ann. Applied Biol., 121: 85-94.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sere, Y., A. Onasanya, K. Akator, A. Afolabi and M.E. Abo, 2007. Serological differentiation indices and phylogenetic analysis ofRice yellow mottle virus isolates in cote d`Ivoire. J. Boil. Sci., 7: 1147-1154.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sere, Y., F. Sorho, A. Onasanya, L. Jobe and S. Darboe et al., 2008. First report of in rice in the gambia rice yellow mottle virus. Plant Dis., 92: 316-316.
Direct Link  |  

Sorho, F., A. Pinel, O. Traore, A. Bersoult and A. Guesquiere et al., 2005. Durability of natural and transgenic resistances in rice to rice yellow mottle virus. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 112: 349-359.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Traore, O., F. Sorho, A. Pinel, Z. Abubakar and O. Banwo et al., 2005. Process of diversiofication and dispersion of rice yellow mottle virus inferred from large-scale and high-resolution phylogeographical studies. Mol. Ecol., 14: 2097-2110.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Uzest, M., D. Gargani, M. Drucker, E. Hebrard and E. Garzo et al., 2007. A protein key to plant virus transmission at the tip of insect vector stylet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 104: 17959-17964.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved