Variability of Soil Properties at the Transition Zone Between Two Parent Materials in South Western Nigeria
A rigid grid soil survey was carried out on a 1,295 hectares land at the transitional zone between Basement complex and Sedimentary soils of southwestern Nigeria at Atuagbo-Ekhilor, Edo State. Six mapping units were established. A fertility evaluation of the soils was carried out by examining and sampling the soils at 0-20 cm depth. The number of observation point was dependent on the areal coverage of the mapping units identified. Sample were processed and analyzed for eighteen parameters. Thevariability of individual property as indicated by coefficient of variation differed widely: Silt, clay and gravel, organic C, total N, Avail. P, Mn, B, Zn and K were highly variable (CV>35%) while sand, Ca, Mg, N and ECEC were moderately variable (CV 15-35%). Three properties pH, Exch acidity and Base saturation were least variable (CV<15%). The variance ratio test indicate that some properties which are most influenced by management significantly (p<0.01) affected the variability of the soil. Data of this kind would give a better understanding of the soil fertility of the area and planning of management practices to be employed for optimum output. Also, data of this kind should accompany soil survey report so that soil map users can have a better understanding of the soils they are working with.
Soil variability has been extensively studied at both small and large scales. This is evident in the reviews by Wilding and Drees (1978), Ogunkunle (1986 and 1993), Fasina (2002) and Zebarth et al. (2002). Much of the existing information on soil variability, including the few on tropical soils (Babalola et al., 2007; Areola, 1982), concentrates on soil variability. This is the component of total variability observed over a considerable distance of between two distinctly different units such as parent materials or land facets (Van wambeke and Dual, 1978).
Knowledge of the degree of variability of soil over an area and the factors responsible for this variability is essential for practical, commercial and experimental agriculture. Little information has been published to document variability at the transition zone between two parent materials and within mapping units with reference to soil nutrient status.
Soil exhibits tremendous variations both laterally and vertically. The result of some previous soil variability studies (Ogunkunle, 1986) have revealed very high variations between soil properties of two closely spaced spots 10 m apart on a uniform terrain on the Basement complex of southwestern Nigeria. Variations in soil properties have also been found to influence soil management and crop production (Fasina, 2005). Significant crop yield differences between plots on the same soil series due to differences in the native potassium have been encountered (Costigan et al., 1983; Shittu and Fasina, 2006). Soil variability study across the landscape prior to cropping would have revealed such differences and hence better informed landuse planning and management.
It has also been established that for most arable crops, the control of crop performance is mainly in the plough layer (0-20 cm) where most plant roots concentrate, Similarly, Sopher and McCracken (1973) found that 70% of corn yield variation was due to soil nutrient or properties of the plough layer. Lal et al. (1975) also observed that the removal of 2.5 and 7.5 cm of the topsoil resulted in 50 and 90% reduction in maize yield.
Spatial variability in soils occurs mostly naturally from pedogenetic factors. Also, variability can occur as a result of the type of land use and management (Shittu et al. (2006). This can influence soil fertility, crop growth and yield. There is need to generate information on soil variability on farms which can be of use to farmers. This study was therefore undertaken to examine the spatial variability of soil properties in six mapping units at the transition zone between two parent materials in southwestern Nigeria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of Project Site
The project site is about 1,295 ha, located about 3 km northwest of Atuagbo
town in the Esan Central local government of Edo state, Nigeria. It is about
10 km from Irua. It lies centrally within latitudes 6° 30N and 7°
00N and longitudes 6°00E and 6° 30E on the Topo sheet
Ubiaja 285 SE of 1964. It is in the transition zone between rainforest and guinea
savanna, generally referred to as forest-savanna mosaic. The mean monthly temperature
ranges between 20.1 and 33°C. The project site is underlain by sedimentary
deposition and Basement complex metamorphic rock. It has a humid climate with
marked wet and dry seasons.
Soil Survey Method, Sampling and Analysis
A rigid grid method of soil survey was adopted at a scale of 1:10,000 to
establish the mapping units (soil series). Auger observations were made at intervals
of 200 m along each transects. Six mapping units were identified and demarcated
on the base map. The area coverage of each of the mapping units was estimated
(Iweke 75.85 ha, Mesan 34.42 ha, Iju 359.18 ha, Molo 315.50 ha, Agege 355.40
ha and Kulfo 155.65 ha). Surface soil (0-20 cm) samples were collected with
the aid of soil auger from the mapping units. The number of sampling locations
was proportionate to the areal coverage of each of the mapping units. The classification
of the soils of the six mapping units is presented in Table 1.
The soil samples were air-dried, ground and sieved to separate the fine earth
fraction (≤2 mm) from coarser fragments. Gravel content was determined gravimetrically
as the percentage of particles with diameter >2 mm to the whole soil sample.
Particle size analysis was done by the hydrometer method (Day, 1965). Soil pH
was determined electrometrically in water (1:1 soil to water ratio). Organic
carbon was analyzed by the dichromate wet oxidation method of Walkley-Black
(1934). Total nitrogen was determined by Micro-kjedahl method. The exchangeable
cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) were extracted in 1 N neutral NH4OAC.
Na, K contents were determined by flame photometer while Ca and Mg were by atomic
|| Soil classification
The variability of the soil properties within and between the different
mapping units was measured by estimating the mean (x), the standard deviation
(SD) and coefficient of variation (CV). The variance ratio test was also calculated
to test the between /within unit ratio of the mean square (i.e., F-ratio) for
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Table 1 shows the classification of the pedons and their local and international names. The local names were according to Moss (1957). Their appropriate taxonomic classifications were according to USDA soil taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1994) and FAO/UNESCO (1988) soil map of the world revised legend. The areal covered of each of the mapping units were indicated.
Variation of Soil Properties Using Coefficient of Variation (CV)
The coefficient of variation of the properties for individual mapping unit
as presented in Table 2 indicated that some soil properties
are more variable than others. The mean sand content appears to be more homogenous
with all the mapping units, having CV <15% (Wilding and Dress, 1978). The
CV of sand ranges from 4.33-18.4%. High CV were recorded for silt (16.56-68.04%),
clay (1.25-39.28%) and gravel (2.82-76.58%) content. With respect to gravel
content, all the mapping units are extremely variable except for Iju and Kulfo
soils, indicating that the soils are more heterogeneous in gravel content when
mineral fractions are considered.
Chemical properties for different mapping units indicted that total N, available
P, B organic C, K and Mg with CVs, range of 40.4-75.7, 52.8-88.9, 27.6-70.5,
33.8-75.2, 28.0-51.2 and 21.6-43.7%, respectively are more variable while Ca,
Na, Exch. Acidity, ECEC, Base. Saturation, Zn with CVs range of 0.93-28.5, 15.8-39.8,
0.00-15.2, 14.9-26.8, 0.00-1.47 and 5.9-25.3%, respectively are less variable.
These values obtained when grouped together by the method of Wilding and Drees
(1978) puts Iju, Agege, Kulfo series as least variable while Iweke and Molo
series are moderately variable while Mesan series is most variable.
|| Variability of soil properties among mapping units 0-20 cm
|8E-05 = 5x10-8, 4E-04 = 4x10-4, 3E-05
= 5x10-5, 2E-04 = 4x10-2
Soils between the mapping units are more uniform in those properties which are genetically important such as textural properties, (% sand, silt, clay and gravel), pH, exch. acidity and percentage base saturation while those properties which are related to management e.g., (Ca, Mg, Na ECEC, organic C, Total N, Avail P, Mn, B and Zn) are more variable (Table 3).
The observed difference in the variability of physical properties can be attributed to rock weathering, biological action, micro relief and parent material from which the soils are formed. The high CVs for gravel in some mapping units e.g., (Iweke, Yampere, Molo and Agege) indicate that the soils are not uniform with respect to gravel content (Table 3).
The CV result obtained (Table 3) when all the mapping units are pulled together shows that some chemical properties are less variable than others, pH, Exch. Acid, B. saturation, Ca Mg, Na ECEC are less variable while exchangeable K, Organic C, Total N, Avail P, Mn, B and Zn appear to be more variable with CVs >35%. The CV values obtained in this study when grouped together by method of Wilding and Drees (1978) put Iju, Agege and Kulfo as least variable. Iweke and Molo are moderately variable while Mesan is most variable. Also the CV value obtained (Table 4) for soil properties put pH, Exch. Acidity, Base saturation as least variable having CV <15% while sand, clay, Ca, Mg, Na, ECEC. are moderately variable (CV 15-35%) and silt, gravel, K, organic C, Total N, Avail P, Mn, B, Zn are extremely variable having CV >35%.
The high level variation observed could be attributed to soil management practice
employed in the area. At the time of survey, apart from some arable crops like
cocoyam, cassava yam, that were grown, it was noted that oil palm trees were
very common in the area. It has been noted that oil palm do have remarkable
influences on soil chemical properties, Kang (1977) and Ogunkunle (1986). Zebarth
et al. (2002) noted that human induced changes in soil can fundamentally
alter the natural pattern of soil distribution in landscape even over relatively
short time scales. Also Becket and Webster (1971) showed that in cultivated
area, contrasting crops, soil amelioration and addition of fertilizer super
impose differences between fields in addition to the variation already present
in the native soils.
|| Estimate of variability between the mapping units
|*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ns = Not significant
||Grouping of soil properties using CV values
|Adopted from Wilding and Drees (1978)
Variance Ratio Test (F-Ratio Test)
The result in Table 3 indicate that for soil properties
considered, 50% of the mapping units are homogenous with reference to nine out
of the eighteen properties studied showing significance difference between the
mapping units. All the physical properties except gavel content significantly
(p<0.01) affect the homogeneity of the soil (Table 3).
The high variability within the mapping unit obtained for available P in this
study was however not significant, despite the high CVs obtained. This can be
explained from the view expressed by Becket and Webster (1971) that the variability
in these properties which are largely affected by management introduced by differences
in crops and management practice within a soil series could be as high as or
higher than the variability introduced between series.
The high level of variability associated with these soils can be accounted for in term of their complex nature arising from their parent materials, landuse and management practices. The soils lie on the fringes of two-parent materials (Sedimentary and Basement complex). Mesan (highly variable), Iweke and Molo series all differed significantly in most of their chemical properties, Hence they should be managed differently. They cannot be representative enough or uniform for the whole land area for agricultural purpose.
In order to achieve optimum crop production, there is need to embark on the use of recommended cultural practices, rational use of fertilizers accompanied with optimum soil and crop management inputs that will take into cognizance, the variability of the soils. Since agronomic trials are measured by yield produced and such yields are highly dependent on soil fertility, the result will be affected by high soil variability as demonstrated in this study. Minimum tillage operation is recommended here, in order to effectively control water erosion and hence land degradation.
1: Areola, D., 1982. Soil variability within land facets in areas of low, smooth relief: A case study of the Gwagwa plains Nigeria. Soil Surv. Land Evaluat., 3: 1-9.
2: Babalola, T.S., A.S. Fasina and T. Peter, 2007. Relationship between soil properties and slope position in a humid forest of Southwest Nigeria. Agric. J., 2: 370-374.
3: Becket, P.H.T. and R. Webster, 1971. Soil variability: A review. Soil Fert., 34: 1-15.
4: Costigan, P.A., D.J. Greenwood and T. McBurney, 1983. Variation in yield between two similar sandy loam soils.1. Description of soils and measurement of yield differences. J. Soil Sci., 34: 64-67.
5: Day, P.R., 1965. Particle Fractionation and Particle Size Analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Black , A. (Ed.). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI., USA., pp: 545-555
6: FAO/UNESCO, 1988. Soil map of the world. Revised Legend. ISRIC, FAO Rome, pp: 119.
7: Fasina, A.S., 2002. Variability of maize yield and some soil properties in an exhaustively cultivated field in school of agriculture, Ikorodu. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. Malaysia, 25: 11-18.
8: Fasina, A.S., 2005. Influence of landuse on the variability of topsoil properties of an alfisol in Southern Nigeria. J. Agric. Res. Dev., 4: 12-16.
9: Kang, B.T., 1977. Effect of some biological factors on soil variability in the Tropic. II Effect of oilpalm trees (Elaeis guinences). Plant Soil, 47: 451-462.
10: Lal, R., B.T. Kang, F.R. Moorman, A.S.R. Juo and J.C. Moorman, 1975. Soil Management Problems and Possible Solutions in Western Nigeria. In: Soil Management in Tropical Africa, Bernemisza, E. and Alvarada (Eds.). State University Ralegh, North Carolina, pp: 372-408
11: Moss, R.P., 1957. Report on classification of soil found in sedimentary rock in Western Nigeria. Soil Survey Report No. 11. University of Ife, Moor Plantation, Ibadan, pp: 168.
12: Shittu, O.S., O.C. Adebooye, A.S. Fasina and F.O. Omolayo, 2006. Response of Leaf yield and chemical composition of Amaranthus cruentus L. and Celosia argentia to landuse types and fertilizer regime. Int. J. Agric. Res., 1: 286-292.
13: Shittu, O.S. and A.S. Fasina, 2006. Comparative effect of different residue management on maize yield at Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. J. Sustainable Agric., 28: 41-54.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
14: Soil Survey Staff, 1994. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 6th Edn., U.S. Depart. Agric., Washington, DC
15: Sopher, C.D. and R.J. McCracken, 1773. Relationships between soil properties, management practices and corn yield on south Atlantic covered plains soils. Agron. J., 65: 595-600.
16: Ogunkunle, A.O., 1986. Spatial variability of some chemical properties between two mapping units in Southern Nigeria. Soil Surv. Land Evaluat., 6: 26-32.
17: Ogunkunle, A.O., 1993. Variation of some soil properties along two toposequences in Quartzite schist and Gneiss in southwestern Nigeria. Geoderma J., 30: 397-402.
Direct Link |
18: Van-Wambeke, A. and R. Dudal, 1978. Macrovariability of Soils of Tropics. In: Diversity of Soils in the Tropics, Drosdoff, M., R.B. Daniels and J.J. Nicholaides (Eds.). Vol. 34, ASA, Madison, WI., USA., pp: 13-28
19: Wilding, L.P. and R. Drees, 1978. Spatial Variability: A Pedologists Viewpoint Diversity of Soils in the Tropic. Vol. 34, SSSA, Madison, WI., USA., pp: 1-12
20: Zebarth, R.H., J. Walsh and C.D.J. Pennock, 2002. Soil variation within a humid day production landscape under intensive potato production. Geoderma, 110: 19-33.