Submit Manuscript

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2016 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 52-56
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Effect of Nipple Lines vs. Water Trough on Pekin Duck Breeder Performance and Well-Being

Zachary S. Lowman, Carmen R. Parkhurst and Jocelyn Romano

ABSTRACT

Ducks have a unique fondness to water compared to other commercial poultry. There have been a few studies that shown positive improvement in welfare measurements such as foot pad condition in meat type slaughter ducks. However, after a review of the literature, there appears to be no trials that examine the effects of open source waterers on breeder ducks. In slaughter ducks high bacterial loads and increased litter moisture, both typically negative aspects of foot quality are typically found. But slaughter ducks are only grown an average of 38-42 day, which minimizes long term effects of these problems. However breeder ducks are kept for significantly longer periods of time. So it is logical to explore the long term effects of such practices on the welfare of breeder ducks. For this trial a commercial Pekin breeder flock of 6,262 ducks 17 weeks of age was equally split into 2 groups (3131 duck/trt) all birds were housed in the same house, equal stocking density and equal amounts of shavings added daily. One group was provided access to 4 conventional nipple lines; the other side was supplemented with a trough waterer, as well as 2 nipple lines to maintain equal water access between the groups. Numerous measurements were recorded including mortality, egg production, litter moisture, daily water consumption, water bacteria levels and foot pad scores. Data was analyzed using the ANOVA and Chi squared features of JMP 10. The trough group had significantly higher % litter moisture, elevated coliform and general aerobic CFU counts and increased incidents of foot pad lesion compared to the control group. The control group produced significantly more eggs and used less water than ducks from the trough group. Based on this trial, open source waterers appear to cause significantly more foot lesion in breeder ducks, which could cause significant welfare concerns.
PDF References Citation

Search

REFERENCES

  1. Alenciks, E., A. Schenk, C. Campbell, A. Meelker and K. Frazier et al., 2015. Raising ducks with water lines vs. water troughs: Part 2 Water troughs adversely affect duck body condition and behavior. Proceedings of the International Poultry Exposition, January 22-26, 2015, Atlanta, GA.
  2. Do Amaral, L.A., 2004. Drinking water as a risk factor to poultry health. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., 6: 191-199.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  3. Bergmann, S., E. Heyn, C. Schweizer, N. Hirsch and N. Harnisch et al., 2011. Water Supply for Pekin Ducks via Modified Bell Drinkers-Effect on Health and Water Quality. In: Animal Hygiene and Sustainable Livestock Production: Innovations in Hygiene, Nutrition and Housing for Healthy Food from Healthy Animals, Volume 3, Kofer, J. and H. Schobesberger (Eds.). International Society for Animal Hygiene, Vienna, Austria, ISBN: 9788026300120, pp: 131-133.
  4. Broom, D.M., 2006. Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 97: 73-83.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  5. De Jong, I.C., H. Gunnink and J. van Harn, 2014. Wet litter not only induces footpad dermatitis but also reduces overall welfare, technical performance and carcass yield in broiler chickens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 23: 51-58.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  6. Frazier, K., A. Porter, A. Schenk, C. Campbell and A. Meelker et al., 2015. Raising ducks with water lines vs. water troughs: Part 4: Water trough significantly increase mortality and decrease production. Proceedings of the International Poultry Exposition, January 22-26, 2015, Atlanta, GA.
  7. Grizzle, J.M., T.A. Armbrust, M.A. Bryan and A.M. Saxton, 1997. Water quality III: The effect of water nitrate and bacteria on broiler breeder performance. J. Applied Poult. Res., 6: 56-63.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  8. Jones, T.A., C.D. Waitt and M.S. Dawkins, 2009. Water off a duck's back: Showers and troughs match ponds for improving duck welfare. Applied Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 52-57.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  9. Jones, T.A. and M.S. Dawkins, 2010. Environment and management factors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on commercial farms in the UK. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 12-21.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  10. Kuhnt, K., M.A. Bulheller, J. Hartung and U. Knierim, 2004. Hygenic aspects of provision of bathing water for Muscovy ducks in Standard housing. Proceedings of the 22th World's Poultry Science Congress, June 8-13, 2004, Istanbul, Tukrey, pp: 694.
  11. Liste, G., R.D. Kirkden and D.M. Broom, 2013. A commercial trial evaluating three open water sources for farmed ducks: Effects on water usage and water quality. Br. Poult. Sci., 54: 24-32.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  12. O'Driscoll, K.K.M. and D.M. Broom, 2011. Does access to open water affect the health of pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos)? Poult. Sci., 90: 299-307.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  13. Porter, A., A. Meelker, E. Alenciks, K. Frazier, C. Covell, A. Best and G.S. Fraley, 2015. Raising ducks with water lines vs. water troughs: Part 1: Raising pekin ducks on water troughs causes considerable microbial contamination of water compared to water lines. Proceedings of the International Poultry Exposition, January 22-26, 2015, Atlanta, GA.
  14. Rodenburg, T.B., M.B.M. Bracke, J. Berk, J. Cooper and J.M. Faure et al., 2005. Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 61: 633-646.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Search

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *