Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Evaluation of an Alcohol-based Sanitizer Spray’s Bactericidal Effects on Salmonella Inoculated onto Stainless Steel and Shell Egg Processing Equipment

Michael T. Musgrove and J.K. Northcutt
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Improved sanitation procedures during shell egg processing may reduce the risk of food-borne illness. Experiments were conducted to determine the ability of an alcohol-quaternary ammonium sanitizer or water to reduce Salmonella inoculated onto stainless steel and shell egg processing equipment. A nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella typhimurium (ST) isolate was grown on agar plates at 37°C for 18-24 h; cells were harvested and added to Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) to generate 8.5 Salmonella cells/mL inoculum in two experiments. Both experiments were repeated twice. In the first experiment four stainless steel beakers were contaminated by spraying 10 mL of inoculum, respectively. Beakers were allowed to dry for 15 min. Two of the beakers were sprayed with 20 mL of water and the other two were sprayed with a sanitizer solution (70% isopropyl alcohol and 200 ppm quaternary ammonium). After 5 min and 24 h each beaker was swabbed with a PBS moistened sponge and plated onto BGS supplemented with 200 ppm nalidixic acid to enumerate surviving ST. In the second experiment, inoculum was sprayed onto two brushes from shell egg packing machinery. After 15 min, one brush was sprayed with water for five min and the other was sprayed with the sanitizer for 30 s. Each brush was sampled by swabbing three times after 5 min and 24 h. After 5 min, 5.5 and 0.6 log CFU/mL ST and after 24 h, 2.8 and 0.0 log CFU/mL ST were recovered from stainless steel, respectively. Packer head brush average results were 4.7 and 3.1 log CFU/mL ST after 5 min and were 4.0 and 0.00 log CFU/ml ST after 24 h. This sanitizer solution and delivery system were 100 to 10,000 times more effective than water in reducing Salmonella numbers.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Michael T. Musgrove and J.K. Northcutt, 2012. Evaluation of an Alcohol-based Sanitizer Spray’s Bactericidal Effects on Salmonella Inoculated onto Stainless Steel and Shell Egg Processing Equipment. International Journal of Poultry Science, 11: 92-95.

DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2012.92.95


1:  Bae, Y.M., S.Y. Baek and S.Y. Lee, 2012. Resistance of pathogenic bacteria on the surface of stainless depending on attachment form and efficiency of chemicals. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 153: 465-473.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Bell, C. and A. Kyriakides, 2002. Salmonella: A practical approach to the organism and its control in foods. 1st Edn., Blackwell Science, Cornwell, England, ISBN-10: 0632055197.

3:  Bremer, P.J., I. Monk and R. Butler, 2002. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Flavobacterium sp. biofilms using chlorine: Impact of substrate, pH, time and concentration. Lett. Applied Microbiol., 35: 321-325.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Carrasco, E., A. Morales-Rueda and R.M. Garcia-Gimeno, 2012. Cross-contamination and recontamination by Salmonella in foods: A review. Food Res. Int., 45: 545-556.
Direct Link  |  

5:  Cogan, T.A. and T.J. Humphrey, 2003. The rise and fall of Salmonella enteritidis in the UK. J. Applied Microbiol., 94: 114-119.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Forsythe, S.J. and P.R. Hayes, 2000. Food Hygiene, Microbiology and HACCP. Aspen Publication, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

7:  Jones, D.R. and M.T. Musgrove, 2008. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae on vacuum loaders in shell egg processing. Poult. Sci., 87: 1678-1681.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Jones, D.R., J.K. Northcutt, M.T. Musgrove, P.A. Curtis, K.E. Anderson, D.L. Fletcher and N.A. Cox, 2003. Survey of shell egg processing plant sanitation programs: Effects on egg contact surfaces. J. Food Prot., 66: 1486-1489.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Joseph, B., S.K. Otta and I. Karunasagar, 2001. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. on food contact surfaces and their sensitivity to sanitizers. Int. Food Microbiol., 64: 367-372.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Lomander, A., P. Schreuders, E. Russek-Cohen and L. Ali, 2004. Evaluation of chlorines' impact on biofilms on scratched stainless steel surfaces. Bioresour. Technol., 94: 275-283.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Musgrove, M.T. and D.R. Jones, 2006. Sanitation sampling in US shell egg processing plants. Proceedings of the 35th Annual United States Japan Cooperative Program in Natural Resources Food and Agricultural Panel, September 27, 2006, Tsukuba, Japan, pp: 272-279.

12:  Musgrove, M.T., D.R. Jones, J.K. Northcutt, P.A. Curtis, K.E. Anderson, D.L. Fletcher and N.A. Cox, 2004. Survey of shell egg processing plant sanitation programs: Effects on non-egg contact surfaces. J. Food Prot., 67: 2801-2804.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  NACMCF, 1992. Hazard analysis and critical control point system. National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods.

14:  Ricke, S.C., S.G. Birkhold and R.K. Gast, 2001. Eggs and Egg Products. In: Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Downes, F.P. and K. Ito (Eds.). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 473-479.

15:  USDA, 1999. Plant sanitation and good manufacturing practices program for processing eggs. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., USA.

16:  Valeriano, C., T.L. Coutinho, M. Cardoso, E. Alves and R. Hilsdor, 2011. The sanitizing action of essential oilbased solutions against Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis S64 biofilm formation on A151 304 stainless steel. Food Control, 25: 673-677.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved