Research Article

Use of Serratia marcescens for Feed Processing: Broiler Performance and Pathogenicity Assay

Maria Endo Mahata, Ichni Lestari, Abdi Dharma, Irsan Ryanto H., Armenia and Yose Rizal
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Serratia marcescens is a bacterium able to produce chitinase for degrading chitin. Broiler chickens can not digest significant amounts of chitin because they produce very little chitinase in their digestive tract. Therefore, broiler feed containing chitin must be processed first with chitinase. Serratia marcescens is an opportunistic pathogenic bacterium and a pathogenicity test is required before using its chitinase for processing of feed containing chitin. An experiment was conducted by using broiler. A split-plot, completely randomized design is used in this experiment. The Serratia marcescens dosages (0, 40, 80, 160 and 320 mg/kg body weight) were the main plot and observation lengths (2, 4, 8, 16 and 22 days) were the sub plot factor. The ration for different treatments had the same protein (23%) and energy (3000 kkal/kg) content. Feed consumption, average daily gain, body temperature and mortality were parameters. Results showed that feed consumption and average daily gain were significantly affected (p<0.05) by presence of Serratia marcescens. The highest feed consumption (123.10 g/broiler) and average daily gain (76.75 g/broiler/day) were found for the highest bacterium dosage of 320 mg/kg body over 22 days observation. Body temperature range from 39.82-40.08°C and there was no affect of Serratia marcescens on mortality. In conclusion, the Serratia marcescens had no negative effect on broiler performance.

Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Maria Endo Mahata, Ichni Lestari, Abdi Dharma, Irsan Ryanto H., Armenia and Yose Rizal, 2012. Use of Serratia marcescens for Feed Processing: Broiler Performance and Pathogenicity Assay. International Journal of Poultry Science, 11: 424-426.

DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2012.424.426



  1. Buchanan, R.E., N.E. Gibbons, S.T. Cowan, T.G. Holt and J. Liston et al., 1974. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th Edn., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, ISBN: 0683011170

  2. Carter, G.R. and C.R. John, 1992. Diagnostic Procedures in Veterinary Bacteriology and Miycology. Hancourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, USA

  3. Guentzel, M.N., 1996. Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Serratia, Citrobacter and Proteus. In: Medical Microbiology, Baron, S. (Ed.). 4th Edn. University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

  4. Kobayashi, D.Y., M. Guglielmoni and B.B. Clarke, 1995. Isolation of the chitinolytic bacteria Xanthomonas maltophilia and Serratia marcescens as biocontrol agents for summer patch disease of turfgrass. Soil Biol. Biochem., 27: 1479-1487.
    CrossRef  |  

  5. NRC., 1994. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry. 9th Rev. Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 978-0-309-04892-7, Pages: 176
    Direct Link  |  

  6. Parkhurst, C.R. and G.J. Mountney, 1988. Poultry Meat and Egg Production. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, ISBN: 9781475706857

  7. Scott, M.L., M.C. Nesheim and R.J. Young, 1982. Nutrition of the Chicken. 3rd Edn., M.L. Scott and Associates Ithaca, New York, USA., ISBN-10: 0960272623, Pages: 562

  8. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principle and Procedures of Statistics: A Biochemical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York, USA

  9. Sturkie, P.D., 1965. Avian Physiology. 2nd Edn., Cornell University Press, USA

  10. Thompson, E.D., 1985. Drug Bioscreening: Fundamentals of Drug Evaluation Techniques in Pharmacology. Vol. 1, Graceway Publishing Co., Fresh Meadows, Queens, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780932126078, Pages: 164

  11. Volk, W.A. and M.F. Wheeler, 1993. Basic Microbiology. 5th Edn., Erlangga Press, Jakarta

©  2023 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved