• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Poultry Science
  2. Vol 10 (4), 2011
  3. 315-319
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2011 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 315-319
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2011.315.319
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

A Comparison of Humoral Immune Function in Response to a Killed Newcastle’s Vaccine Challenge in Caged Vs. Free-range Hy-line Brown Layers

D.V. Arbona, K.E. Anderson and J.B. Hoffman

ABSTRACT


The relationship between immune function and disease risk may be greatly influenced by an organism’s response to chronic stressors including those that are environmentally induced. Measurements of stress-induced immune alterations have previously been made in poultry species by utilizing hematological and immunological indices. To ascertain the effects of alternative layer housing management methods on humoral immune function, Hy-line Brown hens housed on range (n = 15) or in battery style cages (n = 20) were inoculated with a killed Newcastle′s vaccine. Blood serum samples were taken prior to injection and for three consecutive weeks following injection to assess antibody production. Antibody production was significantly higher in caged hens in comparison to free-range hens at pre-injection (1.69±0.70 vs. 0.069±0.069) (p<0.0001) and post-injection week one (2.26±0.77 vs. 0.145±0.25) (p<0.0001), week two (8.00±2.98 vs. 4.38±2.94) (p<0.001) and week 3 (9.24±2.56 vs. 6.69±3.86) (p<0.05). Additionally, caged hens exhibited a significantly higher level (p<0.0001) of total antibody production (5.30±0.23) throughout the immune challenge compared to free-range hens (2.82±0.26). Caged hens exhibited significantly higher H:L ratios (2.34±0.86 vs. 1.75±0.57) (p<0.05) during post-injection week 2 which correlated with the greatest difference in antibody production observed between the two groups of hens. This data indicated that environmental management methods utilized in layer hen production may influence both levels of humoral immune function and heterophil:lymphocyte ratios.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

D.V. Arbona, K.E. Anderson and J.B. Hoffman, 2011. A Comparison of Humoral Immune Function in Response to a Killed Newcastle’s Vaccine Challenge in Caged Vs. Free-range Hy-line Brown Layers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10: 315-319.

DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2011.315.319

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2011.315.319

Search


REFERENCES


  1. Anderson, K.E., 2009. Overview of natural and organic egg production: Looking back to the future. J. Applied Poult. Res., 18: 348-354.
    Direct Link

  2. Anderson, K.E., 2009. Single production cycle report of the 37th North carolina layer performance and management test. North Carolina State University, Cooperative Extension, Raleigh, NC 27695.

  3. Appleby, M.C., 1998. Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior. Poult. Sci., 77: 1828-1832.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Appleby, M.C., B.O. Hughes and A.H. Elson, 1992. Poultry Production Systems: Behsviour, Managetment and Welfare. CAB Internationl, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

  5. Curtis, S.E. and W.R. Stricklin, 1991. The importance of animal cognition in agricultural animal production systems: An overview. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 5001-5007.
    Direct Link

  6. Dohms, J.E. and A. Metz, 1991. Stress-mechanisms of immuno-suppression. Vet. Immunol. Immunophysiol., 30: 89-109.
    PubMed

  7. Dohms, J.E. and Y.M. Saif, 1984. Guest editorial: Criteria for evaluating immunosuppression. Avian Dis., 28: 305-310.
    Direct Link

  8. Erhard, M.H., H. Ozpinar, T. Bilal, I. Abas, C. Kutay, H. Eseceli and M. Stangassinger, 2000. The humoral immune response and the productivity of laying hens kept on ground or in cages. Altern. Lab. Anim., 28: 699-705.
    PubMed

  9. Gross, W.B. and H.S. Siegel, 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis., 27: 972-979.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  10. Hilbrich, P., 1985. History of poultry health. Proceeding of the 2nd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, (ESPW’85), Worlds Poultry Science Association, Celle, Germany, pp: 48-54.

  11. Houwen, B., 2000. Blood film preparation and staining procedures. Lab. Hematol., 6: 1-7.
    Direct Link

  12. Maxwell, M.H. and G.W. Robertson, 1998. The avian heterophil leucocyte: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 54: 155-178.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. McEwen, B.S. and J.C. Wingfield, 2003. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm. Behav., 43: 2-15.
    PubMed

  14. McFarlane, J.M. and S.E. Curtis, 1989. Multiple concurrent stressors in chicks. 3. Effects on plasma corticosterone and the heterophil: Lymphocyte ratio. Poult. Sci., 68: 522-527.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  15. Miller, D.B. and J.P. O'Callaghan, 2002. Neuroendocrine aspects of the response to stress. Metabolism, 51: 5-10.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Riddell, C., C.F. Helmboldt, E.P. Singsen and L.D. Matterson, 1968. Bone pathology of birds affected with cage layer fatigue. Avian Dis., 12: 285-297.
    PubMed

  17. Rodenburg, T.B., F.A. Tuyttens, B. Sonck, K. De Reu, L. Herman and J. Zoons, 2005. Welfare, health and hygience of laying hens housed in furnished cages and in alternative housing systems. J. Applied Anim. Welfare Sci., 8: 211-226.
    PubMed

  18. Sapolsky, R., 1994. Individual difference and the stress response. Seminars Neurosci., 6: 261-269.

  19. SAS Institute Inc., 2000-2009. SAS 9.2 Help and Documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

  20. Shini, S., 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 357-360.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Siegle, H.S., 1985. Immunological responses as indicators of stress. World Poult. Sci. J., 41: 36-44.
    CrossRef

  22. Sumner, D.A., 2008. Economic Effects of Proposed Restrictions on Egg-Laying Hen Housing in California. University of California Agricultural Issues Center, UC Davis, California, Pages: 105.

  23. Tactacan, G.B., W. Guenter, N.J. Lewis, J.C. Rodriguez-Lecompte and J.D. House, 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poult. Sci., 88: 698-707.
    Direct Link

  24. Tauson, R., 1998. Health and production in improved cage designs. Poult. Sci., 77: 1820-1827.
    Direct Link

Search


Related Articles

Physiological Responses of Laying Hens to the Alternative Housing Systems

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved