R. E. Wolfenden
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
N. R. Pumford
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
M. J. Morgan
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
S. Shivaramaiah
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
A. D. Wolfenden
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
G. Tellez
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
B. M. Hargis
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
ABSTRACT
Bacillus-based direct-fed microbials may be an effective alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. Environmental samples were pasteurized to remove vegetative cells, plated onto TSA or SPA for 24 or 72 h and overlayed with soft agar containing S. enteritidis or C. perfringens. Isolates which produced antimicrobial activity against both pathogens were used to inoculate a solid state fermentation media and allowed to sporulate, to numbers greater than 109 spores/g and subjected to in vivo testing in both poults and chicks. In exp. 1 chicks fed isolates PHL-RW35 and PHL-RW41, at doses of 107 and 105 spores/g feed respectively, showed significant increases (p<0.05) in both Body Weight (BW) and Body Weight Gain (BWG). No significant differences in BW or BWG were noted in poults for any treatment. In this experiment, all groups were challenged with 105 cfu of S. typhimurium at day-of-hatch, no significant differences in Salmonella were noted between groups. In experiment 2 PHL-RW41 fed at 105 spores/g of feed significantly increased BWG by 8.3 and 11.7% in chicks and poults respectively. Isolate PHL-RW35 also increased BW and BWG in poults. These data indicate this approach for in vitro selection may be effective for screening and selection of Bacillus direct-fed microbials capable of causing an increase in BW and BWG in commercial poultry.
PDF References
How to cite this article
R. E. Wolfenden, N. R. Pumford, M. J. Morgan, S. Shivaramaiah, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez and B. M. Hargis, 2010. Evaluation of a Screening and Selection Method for Bacillus Isolates for Use as Effective Direct-fed Microbials in Commercial Poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 317-323.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.317.323
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.317.323
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.317.323
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.317.323
REFERENCES
- Barbosa, T.M., C.R. Serra, R.M. La Ragione, M.J. Woodward and A.O. Henriques, 2005. Screening for Bacillus isolates in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 71: 968-978.
CrossRefDirect Link - Bielke, L.R., A.L. Elwood, D.J. Donoghue, A.M. Donoghue, L.A. Newberry, N.K. Neighbor and B.M. Hargis, 2003. Approach for selection of individual enteric bacteria for competitive exclusion in turkey poults. Poult. Sci., 82: 1378-1382.
Direct Link - Choi, J.H., B.S. So, K.S. Ryu and S.L. Kang, 1986. Effects of pelleted or crumbled diets on the performance and the development of the digestive organs of broilers. Poult. Sci., 65: 594-597.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Corrier, D.E., D.J. Nisbet, A.G. Hollister, C.M. Scanlan, B.M. Hargis and J.R. Deloach, 1993. Development of defined cultures of indigenous cecal bacteria to control salmonellosis in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 72: 1164-1168.
PubMed - Cutlip, S.E., J.M. Hott, N.P. Buchanan, A.L. Rack, J.D. Latshaw and J.S. Moritz, 2008. The effect of steam-conditioning practices on pellet quality and growing broiler nutritional value. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 249-261.
Direct Link - Fritts, C.A., J.H. Kersey, M.A. Motl, E.C. Kroger and F. Yan et al., 2000. Bacillus subtilis C-3102 (Calsporin) improves live performance and microbiological status of broiler chickens. J. Applied Poult. Res., 6: 149-155.
CrossRefDirect Link - Guo, X., D. Li, W. Lu, X. Piao and X. Chen, 2006. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 90: 136-146.
CrossRefDirect Link - Hakkinen, M. and C. Schneitz 1999. Efficacy of a commercial competitive exclusion product against Campylobacter jejuni. Br. Poult. Sci., 40: 619-621.
PubMed - Mead, G.C., M.J. Scott, T.J. Humphrey and K. McAlpine, 1996. Observations on the control of Campylobacter jejuni infection of poultry by competitive exclusion. Avian Pathol., 25: 69-79.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Newaj-Fyzul, A., A.A. Adesiyun, A. Mutani, A. Ramsubhag, J. Brunt and B. Austin, 2007. Bacillus subtilis AB1 controls Aeromonas infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Applied Microbiol., 103: 1699-1706.
PubMed - Nicholson, W.L., 2002. Roles of bacillus endospores in the environment. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 59: 410-416.
PubMed - Setlow, P., 2006. Spores of Bacillus subtilis: Their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J. Applied Microbiol., 101: 514-525.
PubMed - Snoeyenbos, G.H., O.M. Weinack and C.F. Smyser, 1979. Further-studies on competitive exclusion for controlling salmonellae in chickens. Avian Dis., 23: 904-914.
PubMed - NRC., 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780309048927, Pages: 176.
Direct Link - Spizizen, J., 1958. Transformation of biochemically deficient strains of bacillus-subtilis by Deoxyribonucleate. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA., 44: 1072-1078.
Direct Link - Stein, T., 2005. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: Structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol. Microbiol., 56: 845-857.
CrossRef - Taheri, H.R., H. Moravej, F. Tabandeh, M. Zaghari and M. Shivazad, 2009. Screening of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as a source of chicken probiotic. Poult. Sci., 88: 1586-1593.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Teo, A.Y.L. and H.M. Tan, 2005. Inhibition of clostridium perfringens by a novel strain of Bacilius subtilis isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 71: 4185-4190.
PubMed - Torres-Rodriguez, A., A.M. Donoghue, D.J. Donoghue, J.T. Barton, G. Tellez and B.M. Hargis, 2007. Performance and condemnation rate analysis of commercial turkey flocks treated with a Lactobacillus spp.-based probiotic. Poult. Sci., 86: 444-446.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Vicent, J.L., L. Avina, A. Torres-Rodriguez, B. Hargis and G. Tellez, 2007. Effect of a Lactobacillus spp-based probiotic culture product on broiler chicks performance under commercial conditions. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 154-156.
CrossRefDirect Link - Vila, B., A. Fontgibell, I. Badiola, E. Esteve-Garcia, G. Jimenez, M. Castillo and J. Brufau, 2009. Reduction of Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis colonization and invasion by Bacillus cereus var. toyoi inclusion in poultry feeds. Poult. Sci., 88: 975-979.
CrossRefDirect Link - Vreeland, R.H., W.D. Rosenzweig and D.W. Powers, 2000. Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal. Nature, 407: 897-900.
CrossRef - Zani, J.L., F.W. da Cruz, A.F. dos Santos and C. Gil-Turnes, 1998. Effect of probiotic CenBiot on the control of diarrhoea and feed efficiency in pigs. J. Applied Microbiol., 84: 68-71.
CrossRef