Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Principal Component Factor Analysis of the Morphostructural Traits of Muscovy Duck



D.M. Ogah, A.A. Alaga and M.O. Momoh
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Eleven body measurements were taken on 320 adult Muscovy duck (124 male and 196 females) within the guinea savanna zone of central Nigeria. The body measurements included Body Length (BDL), Body Width (BDD), Bill Length (BLL), Bill Width (BLD) Bill Height (BLH), Shank Length (SHL), Body Height (BH), Head Length (HL) Neck Length (NL), Head Width (HD) and Wing Length (WL). Sex had significant influence on all traits with higher means recorded for male traits. The correlation coefficient of the body measurements range from negative to moderately high for both sexes. In factor solution of the principal component analysis with VARIMAX rotation of the transformation matrix, four factors with ratio variances of 71.85% were identified for male, the first factor accounted for 36.66% and had its loading for body width, bill width, shank length and body height. In female 2 factors with ratio variances of 53.04% were extracted, the first and the second factors explain 36.76 and 16.27% of the generalized variances with the first had its loading on body length, bill width, body height, neck length and wing length respectively. From the result factor loading in Muscovy duck is sex dependent and can be exploited in improvement programme for the bird.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

D.M. Ogah, A.A. Alaga and M.O. Momoh, 2009. Principal Component Factor Analysis of the Morphostructural Traits of Muscovy Duck. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8: 1100-1103.

DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.1100.1103

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2009.1100.1103

REFERENCES

1:  Badyaev, A.V., G.E. Hill and L.A. Whittingham, 2001. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in house finch. II. Population divergence in relation to local selection. Evolution, 55: 2532-2549.

2:  Baeza, E., J. Williams, D. Guemene and M.J. Duclos, 2001. Sexual dimorphism for growth in Muscovy ducks and changes in Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), Growth Hormone (GH) and triiodothyronine (T3) plasma levels. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 41: 173-179.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Brown, C.J., J.E. Brown and W.T. Butts, 1973. Evaluating relationship among Immatured measure of size, shape and performance of beef bulls. 11. The relationships between immature measures of size shape and feedlot traits in young bulls. J. Anim. Sci., 36: 1021-1021.

4:  Carpenter, Jr. J.A., H.A. Jr. Fitzhugh, T.C. Cartwright, A.A. Meltton and R.C. Thomas, 1971. Principal component for size of Herford cows. J. Anim. Sci., 33: 197-197.

5:  Debut, M., C. Berri, E. Baeza, N. Sellier and C. Arnould et al., 2003. Variation of chicken technological meatquality in relation to genotype and preslaughterstress conditions. Poult. Sci., 82: 1829-1838.

6:  Everitt, B.S., S. Landau and M. Leese, 2001. Cluster Analysis. 4th Edn., Oxford University Press, Oxoford, UK., pp: 55-89

7:  Fumio, M., N. Hideaki and F. Toyokazu, 1982. Application of principal component analysis for defining size and shape in Japanese black cattle sires. Sci. Rep. Fac. Agric. Kobe Univ., 15: 169-176.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Hammock, S.P. and R.R. Shrode, 1986. Calfhood weights, body measurements and measures of fatness versus criteria of overall size and shape for predicting yearling performance in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 63: 447-452.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Ibe, S.N., 1989. Measures of size and conformationin commercial broilers. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 106: 461-469.

10:  Morisson, D.F., 1976. Multivariate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New Yark

11:  Ogah, D.M., I.S. Musa, A. Yakubu, M.O. Momoh and N.I. Dim, 2009. Variation in morphological traits of geographical separated population of indigeneous muscovy duck (Cairina moschata) in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 5th International Poultry Conference, March 10-13, Taba, Egypt.

12:  Riva, J., R. Rizzi, S. Marelli and L.G. Cavalchini, 2004. Body measurements in Bargamasca sheep. Small Rumin. Res., 55: 221-227.

13:  Salako, A.E., 2006. Principal component factor analysis of the morphostructure of immature Uda sheep. Int. J. Morphol., 24: 571-774.

14:  Shahin, K.A., A.M. Soliman and A.E. Moukhtar, 1993. Sources of shared variability for the Egyptian buffalo body shape (conformation). Livest. Prod. Sci., 36: 323-334.
CrossRef  |  

15:  SPSS, 2004. Statistical Package for Social Sciences: Procedure and Facilities for Release. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

16:  Yakubu, A., D.M. Ogah and K.O. Idahor, 2009. Principal component analysis of the morphostructural indices of white Fulani cattle. Trakia J. Sci., 7: 67-73.
Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved