• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics
  2. Vol 6 (1), 2012
  3. 47-53
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics

Year: 2012 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 47-53
DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2012.47.53
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Short Communication

Biometrical Evaluation and Yield Performance Assessment of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Landraces Grown under Lowland Tropical Conditions

O. Udensi, E.A. Edu, E.V. Ikpeme, J.K. Ebiwgai and D.E. Ekpe

ABSTRACT


The precarious and worsening climatic and weather conditions being experienced in the globe today poses a threat to food security. Thus, there is a need for an urgent search for crops with intrinsic capacity to withstand the stressors and still perform well productivity-wise. The present study focused on the estimation of genetic variability and heritability of morphological traits in four cowpea landraces-akidi, olaudi, ileje ajaka and ileje with the aim of improvement. Seeds of the landraces were obtained from dealers in Enugu and Kogi States, Nigeria, respectively and sown on a plot of land measuring 10x10 meters at the University of Calabar Experimental Farm, Calabar during 2010-2011 growing season. A randomized complete block design was adopted during the planting. Variance estimates, genetic advance and heritability of yield and yield-related traits were estimated. The mean morphological and yield performance showed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) in all the parameters studied except days to 50% seedling emergence with “olaudi” variety maturing fast and having the highest seed yield. The results present high and wide genetic variability in the vein length per plant, number of leaves per plant, leaf area, number of flowers per plant, days to 50% maturity and seed yield. Genetic advance were considerably low but with high heritability estimates in all the traits investigated. The results explicitly revealed that there are sufficient genetic variations to encourage the improvement of these orphan crops.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

O. Udensi, E.A. Edu, E.V. Ikpeme, J.K. Ebiwgai and D.E. Ekpe, 2012. Biometrical Evaluation and Yield Performance Assessment of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Landraces Grown under Lowland Tropical Conditions. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 6: 47-53.

DOI: 10.3923/ijpbg.2012.47.53

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijpbg.2012.47.53

Search


INTRODUCTION


According to Damaris (2007), the increased threat to agricultural production in Africa due to global warming has been emphasized in the 2006 United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Nairobi, Kenya. This precarious and worsening climatic and weather conditions being experienced in the globe today are source of serious concerns especially, to food security. Worst still is the fact that the soils are already depleted (Drechsel et al., 2001) and the situation is worsened by increasing effects of soil erosion (Lal, 2003). This precarious situations demand search for crops that will have the intrinsic capacity to withstand the stressors and still perform well productivity-wise. Unfortunately, some of these African’s native drought-tolerant crops are the least researched worldwide, thus leading to their extinction (Naylor et al., 2004). A pragmatic and proactive action becomes imperative towards bridging the gap between food production and population increase, especially in African countries that are plagued with poverty and political instability.

Interestingly, recent advances in biotechnology, molecular biology, genomics and proteomics have evolved techniques culminating to genetic mapping, dissection of crop plants; isolation, cloning and insertion of transgenes into desired crops. This transgenes insertion triggers the recipient crops for its expression. This is usually aimed at improving the crops for better performance, even in adverse conditions. This notwithstanding, conventional techniques involving the use of biometrical approaches has also proved indispensible as a complementary tool to the modern techniques (Udensi et al., 2010, 2011a).

Though cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] has been reported to have high protein value, high variability, high adaptability and drought-tolerant capacity (Siambi et al., 1992; Udensi et al., 2011a, b), its landraces have been skimmed out in terms of research, which has caused serious losses of superior genes that could have been used during crop genetic manipulation. According to IITA (2002), it was estimated that 3.3 million tonnes of cowpea dry grains were produced worldwide. Of this, Nigeria produced 2.1 million tonnes which ranked her the world’s largest producer. This followed by Niger and Mali with 650, 000 and 110,000 tonnes, respectively. It was also estimated that cowpea was grown on a total area of 9.8 million hectares, out of which about 9.3 million hectares is found in West Africa. Additionally, the world average yield was 337 kg per hectare while Nigeria and Niger had 417 kg per hectare and 171 kg per hectare as average yield, respectively. Though, it sounds thrilling, the unfortunate side of this reported statistics is that it is based on improved cowpea lines which has slowly reduced the genetic diversity of the landraces (Udensi et al., 2011a).

According to Ng and Marechal (1985) and Ogunkanmi et al. (2006), the center of diversity for cowpea in West Africa, is an area encompassing the savanna region of Nigeria, southern Niger, part of Burkina Faso, northern Benin, Togo and part of northern Cameroon. This even makes it an important indigenous crop that deserves much attention. Additionally, the high adaptability accredited to cowpea makes them a crop of choice even in the humid lowland tropical conditions of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria.

This study was therefore aimed at estimating genetic variability in the selected cowpea landraces from Nigeria, which could serve as breeding stock for future conservation and improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


This experiment was mounted during the 2010-2011 farming season. Seeds of four landraces of cowpea-Akidi, Olaudi, Ileje ajaka and Ileje were obtained from dealers in Enugu and Kogi States, Nigeria, respectively. A plot of land measuring 10x10 meters was manually cleared in the University of Calabar Experimental Farm, Calabar. Five beds were made with a spacing of 2 m between beds. Three seeds were sown in a hole of 4 cm deep per variety (Center for New Crops and Plants Production, 2002). The 4 varieties were randomized on each bed with 8 replications per variety using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Spacing was 50x75 cm. After seedling emergence, each stand of individual variety was thinned down to 2 stands. Weeding was done 3 and 5 weeks after planting while staking was done 4 weeks after planting. Days to seedling emergence was noted while data on number of leaves, leaf area and vein length were collected 5 and 10 weeks after planting. Days to 50% flowering and days to 50% maturity were also recorded while number of flowers per plant; pod lengths, inter-node length per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of pods per plant, seed yield per plants and 100 seed weight were obtained at maturity.

Statistical analyses: Analysis of variance was computed using statistical software PASW 18 at probability level of 95% (α = 0.05). Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation (PCV and GCV), phenotypic, genotypic and environmental variations, genetic advance and broad sense heritability were estimated according to the methods of Singh and Chaudhary (1985) while genotypic variance was calculated as mean difference between genotypic mean square and error mean square (environmental variance) (Uguru, 1998).

RESULTS


Performance of morphological traits of the four cowpea landraces: The mean morphological and yield performance of four landraces of cowpea showed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) in all the parameters studied except days to 50% seedling emergence that showed no significant difference (p>0.05) among the varieties screened (Table 1). Result obtained showed that Ileje had the smallest leaf surface area at 5 and 10 weeks, while Olaudi had the highest leaf surface area. This trend however, was followed for the number of leaves per plant at 5 and 10 weeks. Importantly, it was observed that Olaudi produced the highest number of seeds per plant (seed yield) while no significant difference (p>0.05) on seed yield was observed in Akidi and Ileje varieties. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) on the number of seeds per pod between Akidi and Ileje ajaka but differed considerably with those of Olaudi and Ileje. Significant differences were observed in the number of pod per plant among the varieties with Olaudi having the highest number of pods. Pod length per plant almost showed the same trend as the number of seeds per pod. Days to 50% flowering showed that Akidi’ variety flowers faster than other landraces screened. Present result revealed that there was no significant difference in the days to 50% flowering between Olaudi and Ileje varieties.

Table 1: Mean yield and yield related morphological traits of four cowpea landraces
Image for - Biometrical Evaluation and Yield Performance Assessment of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Landraces Grown under Lowland Tropical Conditions
Means followed with the same superscript along horizontal array indicates no significant difference (p>0.05)

Table 2: Variance estimates, genetic advance and heritability of morphological traits of cowpea landraces
Image for - Biometrical Evaluation and Yield Performance Assessment of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Landraces Grown under Lowland Tropical Conditions
PCV: Phenotypic coefficient of variation; GCV: Genotypic coefficient of variation; GA: Genetic advance; h2: Broad sense heritability.

Ileje ajaka slightly differed from Ileje in their time of flowering. Additionally, days to 50% maturity showed no significant difference (p>0.05) between Olaudi and Ileje ajaka but significantly differed from those of Akidi and Ileje. The result obtained revealed that Ileje variety matures late when compared to other landraces studied. Olaudi was observed to performed best in most morphological traits studied, most importantly, seed yield.

Variance estimates, genetic advance and heritability of morphological traits investigated: The results presented in Table 2 showed variance estimates, genetic advance and heritability of morphological traits after planting. Results revealed that there were wide genotypic, phenotypic variances among cowpea landraces screened except for days to 50% seedling emergence with very low variance estimates as compared with other parameters. Leaf area per plant, number of leaves per plant, number of flower per plant, vein length at 5 and 10 weeks and seed yield showed very high phenotypic and genotypic variances. Phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variations of the aforementioned traits were also correspondingly high. Other morphological attributes such as days to 50% flowering, number of pod per plant, days to 50% maturity and number of seed per pod showed high phenotypic variance, phenotypic coefficient of variation but rather low genotypic variance and genotypic coefficient of variation. Generally, our result also showed that all the cowpea landraces studied had low genetic advance while broad sense heritability were comparatively high. Conversely, the magnitude of the genetic variances in the yield and yield-related traits were not proportional to the heritability estimates. Seed yield per plant had the highest variance estimates, genetic advance and high heritability.

DISCUSSION


Creation of genetic variability and subsequent selection for important traits is undoubtedly crucial activities that any plant breeder should apply to achieve better yield and other desirable traits. Selection of superior genotypes in any crop is proportional to the amount of genetic variability present in the population and the degree to which the traits are inherited. The magnitude of these estimates obviously suggests the degree to which improvement can be made possible through selection (Ragsdale and Smith, 2003; Udensi et al., 2011a).

Though all morphological traits studied in this research contribute either directly or indirectly to grain yield which is the focal point for selection and breeding of cowpea, it is our thinking that greater attention should be paid to days to flowering, days to maturity and most importantly grain yield. It might prove logical to think that since akidi reaches flowering time first, it would have matured first. This however, was not the case as olaudi and ileje ajaka matured faster than akidi variety. The mechanism underlying this is presently unknown though it might probably be assumed that the variety to reach anthesis first does not necessarily imply that the variety will mature first.

One would have expected that the more the number of leaves, the higher the seed yield courtesy of photosynthesis. This was not the case as olaudi having 111.52 leaves per plant at the 10th week produced 911.0 seeds. The broader the leaf area, the more surface exposed for photosynthetic activities, which could have been the underlying reason behind the seed yield of olaudi variety. This corroborates the earlier reports of Udensi et al. (2010, 2011a). Going by the outstanding performance of olaudi on days to flowering, days to maturity, pod length and seed yield obviously suggest that probably olaudi had superior genes (Udensi et al., 2011a). Present result seems to suggest a direct proportional relationship between the lengths of pod and number of seeds therein. It implies therefore that the longer the pod, the higher will be the seed number. This succinctly, points out to the fact that selection and subsequent breeding of cowpea landraces should take cognizance of varieties with long pods.

The high and wide variability observed among the cowpea landraces screened in the study, especially on some traits (Table 2) agrees with earlier reports by Tyagi et al. (2000) and Sarsamkar et al. (2008) in pigeon pealy (Idahosa et al., 2010; Udensi et al., 2011a). There were high genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation for most of the parameters studied. This is in conformity to the reports of Makeen et al. (2007) and Farshader and Farshader (2008).

Variance estimates in our work, including the broad sense heritability suggest that additive gene effects played paramount role in influencing traits performance. Udensi et al. (2011a) opined that since phenotypic coefficient of variation was greater than genotypic coefficient of variation, so yield improvement through phenotypic selection becomes cardinal. This submission presents itself in our present study. Heritability estimates is the measure of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic causes which has a good predictive function of breeding crops. Present result on broad sense heritability suggest high breeding value, implying more additive genetic effect which is pivotal for crop improvement (Dabholkar, 1992; Rohman et al., 2003; Udensi et al., 2011a). Seed yield should be an important index during cowpea selection, breeding and improvement. This is the case with our present study as there was corresponding high heritability estimate for seed yield and genetic advance, although Amin et al. (1992) reported that for better genetic gain through selection, high heritability will not always be associated with high genetic advance.

CONCLUSION


Giving that these indigenous crops have high nutritive value, high productivity, high variability, high adaptive potential and reservoir for economic genes to withstand changing climatic conditions, they need intensive and holistic research, even in the humid lowland conditions of Calabar, Nigeria. Present results explicitly suggest that these cowpea landraces should be improved, especially olaudi variety owing to their morphological attributes, high variance estimates and high heritability.

REFERENCES


  1. Amin, M.R., N.C.D. Barma and M.A. Razzaque, 1992. Variability, heritability, genetic advance and correlation study in some quantitative characters in durum wheat. Rachis, 11: 30-32.

  2. Center for New Crops and Plants Products, 2002. Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Purdue University, USA.

  3. Dabholkar, A.R., 1992. Elements of Biometrical Genetics. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp: 138-140.

  4. Odeny, D.A., 2007. The potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in Africa. Natural Res. Forum, 31: 297-305.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Drechsel, P., L. Gyiele, D. Kunze and O. Cofie, 2001. Population density, soil nutrient depletion and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Ecol. Econ., 38: 251-258.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Farshader, M. and E. Farshader, 2008. Genetic vairiability and path analysis of chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) landraces and lines. J. Applied Sci., 8: 3951-3956.
    Direct Link

  7. Idahosa, D.O., J.E Alika and A.U. Omoregie, 2010. Genotypic variability for agronomic and yield characters in some cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Nat. Sci., 8: 48-55.
    Direct Link

  8. IITA, 2002. Annual report: Tropical agriculture of Nigeria. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.

  9. Lal, R., 2003. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ. Int., 29: 437-450.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Makeen, K., G. Abrahim, A. Jan and A.K. Singh, 2007. Genetic variability and correlations studies on yield and its components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilezek). J. Agron., 6: 216-218.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Naylor, R.L., W.P. Falcon, R.M. Goodman, M.M. Jahn, T. Sengooba, H. Tefera and R.J. Nelson, 2004. Biotechnology in the developing world: A case for increased investments in orphan crops. Food Policy, 29: 15-44.
    Direct Link

  12. Ng, N.Q. and R. Marechal, 1985. Cowpea Taxonomy, Origin and Germplasm. In: Cowpea Research, Production and Utilization, Singh, S.R and K.O. Rachie (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK., pp: 11-21.

  13. Ogunkanmi, L.A., A. Taiwo, O.L. Mogaji, A. Awobodede, E.I. Eziashi and O.T. Ogundipe, 2006. Assessment of genetic diversity among cultivated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) cultivars from a range of localities across West Africa using agronomic traits. J. Sci. Res. Dev., 10: 111-118.
    Direct Link

  14. Ragsdale, P.I. and C.W. Smith, 2003. Diallel analysis of seed set efficiency in upland cotton. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, (BC'03), National Cotton Council, pp: 820-820.

  15. Rohman, M.M., A.S.M. Iqbal Hussain, M.S. Arifin, Z. Akhtar and M. Hasanuzzaman, 2003. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in mungbean. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2: 1209-1211.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Sarsamkar, S.S., S.B. Borgaonkar, S.V. Kalyankar, B.P. Kadam and G.R. Kadam, 2008. Genetic variability studies in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Int. J. Plant Sci., 3: 502-503.

  17. Siambi, M., P.G.A. Omanga and W. Songa, 1992. Status and needs of the national pigeonpea research program in Kenya. Int. Pigeonpea Newslett., 16: 31-36.

  18. Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhry, 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers New Delhi, India.

  19. Tyagi, P.C., N. Kumar and M.C. Agarawal, 2000. Genetic variability and association of component characters for seed yield in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Legume Res., 23: 92-96.
    Direct Link

  20. Udensi, O., E.V. Ikpeme, A.A. Markson, E.A.B. Edu, U.J. Umana and I.S. Urua, 2010. Selection of soybean genotypes using morphological markers. Int. J. Curr. Res., 7: 5-8.
    Direct Link

  21. Udensi, O., E.J. Umana, E.A. Edu and E.V. Ikpeme, 2011. Screening locally grown pulses for proximate, anti-nutritive and mineral compositions: Indices for conservation and improvement. Int. J. Agric. Res., 6: 504-510.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Uguru, M.I., 1998. Crop Genetics and Breeding. The Comic Printers, Enugu, Nigeria.

  23. Udensi, O., E.A. Edu, U.J. Umana and E.V. Ikpeme, 2011. Estimation of genetic variability in locally grown pulses (Cajans cajan (L.) Millsp and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp): A panacea for sourcing superior genotypes. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 14: 404-407.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Search


Related Articles

Genetic Variability and Correlations Studies on Yield and its Components in Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek)
Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis in Mungbean
Estimation of Genetic Variability in Locally Grown Pulses (Cajans cajan (L.) Millsp and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp): A Panacea for Sourcing Superior Genotypes
Screening Locally Grown Pulses for Proximate, Anti-nutritive and Mineral Compositions: Indices for Conservation and Improvement

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved