


Milk drinks are one of the best refreshing and nutritious beverages as well1. It is also an excellent choice for the transport of active biomaterials such as phenols after being extracted from their different various2,3. Functional foods are increasing day by day because people are adopting functional foods for health benefits and consumers are very much aware of their health4. The flavored milk drinks are a potential food supplement for children and adults who contain phosphorus, calcium, iron and other essential nutrients5. It is concluded that milk drinks are proven to be beneficial under various conditions, such as diabetes, anemia, cancer, constipation, eczema, support healthy skin, the common cold and kidney swelling6. Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) is one of the most commonly traded tropical fruits worldwide. Approximately 20% of the fruit is peel7. Mango peels are agricultural waste, which can be used as a means of benefiting from the recycling of agricultural waste using its extracts to support various food products8,9. The mango peel is a source of biologically active substances such as carotenoids, polyphenols, anthocyanins, flavonoids and enzymes and vitamins7. The mango peel was used as an anticancer effect because has contained compounds with phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity10,11. The bioactive polyphenols have biological properties and antioxidant activity that enable them to use potential ingredients for nutraceutical formulations12 so increased in the food and pharmaceutical fields13.
Microencapsulation is used to increase thermal and chemical stability and their effects against environmental conditions such as humidity and heat. Moreover, to improve the stability, bioavailability and preserve the health beneficial properties of natural sources are incorporating their extracts rich in polyphenols into polymeric matrices14. Nonetheless, the encapsulation can improve the delivery systems, controlled release of food ingredients and offer prolonged, this protection also can mask its astringent flavors or strong odours15. Encapsulated mango peel powder has hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antiviral, antitumor and gastroprotective properties which are mentioned in many studies16. Materials used for encapsulating bioactive compounds include the alginate polymer (maltodextrin and whey protein concentrate), which is biocompatible, biodegradable and has a non-toxic nature17. Maltodextrin (MD) has some advantages such as bland flavor, low cost, good protection against oxidation and low viscosity. Therefore, it is better to use MD in combination with Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC) as surface-active biopolymers for an effective microencapsulation18,19.
This study aims to investigate the effect of encapsulated mango peel phenolic extract in milk beverage on the functional and nutritional properties. As well as studying the impact of these microcapsules on bioactive components release during in vitro gastrointestinal simulation and the oxidative stress in the experimental rats.
Study area: The present study was conducted during September 2020 at the Dairy Department, Food Industries and Nutrition Division, National Research Centre, Egypt.
Materials: Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) was purchased from the Egyptian local market. Maltodextrin (MD) and Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC) (80%) were purchased from Alfasol Co., Turkey. Fresh Full cream milk was procured from the Animal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt. Emulsifier mono and diglyceride 60% was obtained from Misr for Food Additives (MISAD), Giza, Egypt. Pectin was obtained from Sisco Research Laboratories (SRL) Mumbai, India. Commercial grade granulated cane sugar produced by Sugar and Integrated Industries Co. at Hawamdia was obtained from the local market. All chemicals and solvents were purchased from MERCK, USA.
Polyphenols HPLC analysis: HPLC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1260 series. The separation was carried out using the Eclipse C18 column (4.6×250 mm i.d., 5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of water (A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 1 mL min1. The mobile phase was programmed consecutively in a linear gradient as follows: 0 min (82% A), 0-5 min (80% A), 5-8 min (60% A), 8-12 min (60% A), 12-15 min (85% A) and 15-16 min (82% A). The multi-wavelength detector was monitored at 280 nm.
Table 1: Mango peel phenolic extract (MPPE) microcapsules formulations | |||
Wall materials | |||
Formulations | MD* (g) | WPC* (g) | MPPE* powder: Wall materials |
F1 | 100 | 00 | 1:10 |
F2 | 100 | 00 | 1:20 |
F3 | 80 | 20 | 1:10 |
F4 | 80 | 20 | 1:20 |
F5 | 60 | 40 | 1:10 |
F6 | 60 | 40 | 1:20 |
*MD: Maltodextrin, WPC: Whey protein concentrate, MPPE: Mango peel phenolic extract |
The injection volume was 10 μL for each of the sample solutions. The column temperature was maintained at 35°C20.
Preparation of MPPE microcapsules: MPPE microcapsules were prepared according to Farrag13. Whey Protein Concentrate (WPC) and Maltodextrin (MD) were used as wall materials (Table 1).
Measurements of particle size distribution and zeta potential: The particle size and zeta potential were determined with a dynamic light scattering instrument (Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments and Worcestershire, UK).
Encapsulation characterizations
Encapsulation Efficiency (EE): The encapsulation efficiency of MPPE microcapsules was calculated according to Eq. 1 as described by Ades21and Fernandes22:
![]() |
where, TPC is the total phenolic content and SPC is the surface phenolic compounds
Surface morphology analysis: The particle structure of MPPE microcapsules was evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (Quanta FEG 250 SEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oregon, USA).
Determination of Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Content (TPC and TFC) and antioxidant activity: The total phenolic content was determined according to the method of Naczk and Shahidi23 and the results were expressed as mg of catechin equivalent per gram. The method illustrated by Leong and Shui24 was used to determine DPPH radical-scavenging activity and the results were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalent per gram. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) was measured according to Djeridane25 and the results were expressed as mg Rutin equivalents per gram. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) was evaluated as stated by Benzie and Strain26 and the results were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalent per gram.
Manufacture of milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules: The milk beverage formulations were prepared as follows:
Control | : Plain milk without MPPE microcapsules |
T1 | : Milk+MPPE microcapsules 1% (v/w) |
T2 | : Milk+MPPE microcapsules 2% (v/w) |
T3 | : Milk+MPPE microcapsules 3% (v/w) |
Each formulation was contained sucrose 5% (w/w), pectin 0.1% (w/w) and monoglyceride 0.1% (w/w). The milk beverage formulations were heated to 90°C per 5 min then cooled. The mango flavor and food-grade yellow color was added (1 and 0.1%, respectively). All milk beverage formulations were packed into sterilized bottles and stored at 5±2°C for 15 days.
Physicochemical analysis: The total solids, protein, fat and ash were measured by using methods described by Ling27. pH value was measured using a Jenway 3510 pH meter. The Titratable Acidity (TA) was measured according to Krisnaningsih28.
The viscosity of all samples has been measured using a dynamic viscometer at a speed of 50 rpm (Brookfield Model-LV, Brookfield Engineering Laboratory, Stoughton, USA).
In vitro gastrointestinal digestion: In vitro digestion for each MPPE microcapsules and milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules using the method of McDougall29 with some modifications. An initial pepsin/HCl digestion for 2 hrs at 37°C was followed by digestion with bile salts/pancreatin for 2 hrs at 37°C to simulate gastric and small intestine conditions, respectively. The simulated stomach solution was prepared with pepsin, NaCl and pH was adjusted to 2.0. Total 20 mL stomach solution was mixed with 5 g of encapsulated powder dispersions then incubated in a shaking water bath for 2 hrs at 37°C at 100 rpm. Then, the mixture was cooled down immediately and 2 mL aliquots of the Post-Gastric (PG) digestion were collected. After the addition of 4.5 mL of 4 mg mL1 pancreatin and 25 mg mL1 bile salt mixtures, a segment of cellulose dialysis tubing containing sufficient NaOH to neutralize the titratable acidity was placed into the beaker. After incubation in a shaking water bath for 2 hrs at 37°C and 100 rpm, the solution in the dialysis tubing was collected and stored at -80°C until further analysis. Before analysis, samples were thawed and centrifuged at 18,000 rpm for 10 min.
In vivo experiment: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 gm) were maintained on a standard laboratory diet and water for 1 week before the experiment for acclimatization and to ensure normal growth and behavior. The animals were distributed and housed in individual solid bottom cages in a temperature controlled (23 ± 10°C), 40-60% relative humidity and artificially illuminated (12 hrs dark/light cycle) room free from any source of chemical contamination. The basal diet is for the control groups (-ve and +ve) added by plain milk beverage (without MPPE microcapsules) and the other groups fed on the basal diet supplemented with milk beverage and different concentrations of MPPE microcapsules according to Ezzat30.
Experimental design: Thirty rats were divided into 5 groups (6 for each) where 24 rats were induced by received CCl4 in olive oil (1:3) intragastrically (0.5 mL kg1) twice a week for 2 weeks as follows:
• Control (-ve): | Normal rats fed on the basal synthetic diet that served as -ve control |
• Control (+ve): | Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and plain milk beverage every day by oral intubation for 2 weeks that served as +ve control |
• Group 1: | Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T1 by oral intubation for 2 weeks |
• Group 2: | Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T2 by oral intubation for 2 weeks |
• Group 3: | Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T3 by oral intubation for 2 weeks |
The blood samples were collected from retro-orbital venous plexus under diethyl ether anesthesia where serum and plasma were separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min and stored at -20°C to measure the biochemical parameters.
Statistical analysis: The results of the experiments were expressed as mean values±standard deviation for at least three replicates. The statistical analysis of data was performed using Minitab 18 (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK).
Identification of phenolic and flavonoid compounds by HPLC: The Phenolic Compounds (PC) of Mango Peel Powder (MPP) was determined by the HPLC method (Table 2), the list of phenolic compounds used as a standard is twelve compounds. The highest retention time peak was Gallic acid (3.116 min) then followed by Chlorogenic acid (3.68 min), Catechin (4.267 min), Methyl gallate (5.049 min), Syringic acid (5.787 min), Rutin (6.799 min), Ellagic acid (7.566 min), Coumaric acid (8.253 min), Ferulic acid (9.359 min), Naringenin (9.934 min), Cinnamic acid (13.96 min) and Kaempferol (14.419 min), respectively. The phenolic compounds in MPP were arrangement descending depend on the concentration in MPP (μg g1) as follows: Gallic acid 3601.75, Coumaric acid 1160.41, Naringenin 1034.57, Catechin 604.28, Syringic acid 533.68, Methyl gallate 210.64, Ferulic acid 110.82, Ellagic acid 64.94, Kaempferol 60.15, Rutin 56.36, Chlorogenic acid 40.27 and Cinnamic acid 9.37. The major PC in MPPE was Gallic acid (3601.75 μg g1) and these results are in agreement with Velderrain-Rodríguez31.
Table 2: Phenolic and flavonoid compounds of mango peel phenolic extract powder | ||
Retention | Concentration | |
Phenolic compounds | time (min) | (μg g1) |
Gallic acid | 3.116 | 3601.75 |
Coumaric acid | 8.253 | 1160.41 |
Naringenin | 9.934 | 1034.57 |
Catechin | 4.267 | 604.28 |
Syringic acid | 5.787 | 533.68 |
Methyl gallate | 5.049 | 210.64 |
Ferulic acid | 9.359 | 110.82 |
Ellagic acid | 7.566 | 64.94 |
Kaempferol | 14.419 | 60.15 |
Rutin | 6.799 | 56.36 |
Chlorogenic acid | 3.68 | 40.27 |
Cinnamic acid | 13.96 | 9.37 |
Table 3: Characterizations of MPPE microcapsules | |||
Particle size | Zeta potential | Encapsulated | |
Formulation** | D32 (nm) | (mV) | Efficiency (%) |
F1 | 202.25±9.56 | -14.57±0.54 | 60.75±0.46 |
F2 | 215.12±25.3 | -13.62±0.36 | 65.89±1.56 |
F3 | 303.4±35.2 | -24.76±0.09 | 80.99±0.31 |
F4 | 300.7±25.5 | -20.66±0.97 | 74.13±0.57 |
F5 | 382.1±15.36 | -22.23±0.35 | 74.25±2.31 |
F6 | 336.1±23.1 | -21.35±0.52 | 74.23±0.24 |
Mean values (±S.D.), (n = 3). MPPE = Mango peel phenolic extract, *F1 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:10, F2 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:20, F3 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:10, F4 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:20, F5 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:10, F6 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:20 |
Characterizations of MPPE microcapsules
Zeta potential and particle size: The magnitude of repulsion between the particles or the charge attraction was measured by zeta potential (Table 3). The zeta potential of MPPE microcapsules was ranged from -13.62 to -24.76 mV. The zeta potential of F1 and F2 were lowest compared to other formulations that contained WPC. This may due to the carboxylate groups of WPC being the only charged functionalities present in its globular so, the zeta potential of their always negative independently of pH32. The presence of this potential helps the stability of the solution and prevents droplet coalescence. The diameter of microcapsules varied from 202.25 to 382.1 nm. Thus, the particle size of formulations contained WPC (F3-F6) was 300.7 to 382.1 nm, compared to the formulations contained MD (F1 and F2 were 202.25 and 215.12 nm, respectively) because WPC was easy to interact with phenolic compounds and form a complex which leads to the coalescing of droplets faster13. Also, using MD as a wall material increased the viscosity of the solutions, which was followed by an increase in the size of the particles where the large droplets formed during atomization and therefore, obtained large powder particles33.
Encapsulated Efficiency (EE): Through the results presented in Table 3, it was noted that the highest EE was observed in F3 to F6 compared to F1 and F2, where, F3 was the highest EE (80.99%). The surface polyphenol content of capsules was needed to calculate the encapsulation efficiency. In a high efficient encapsulation process, the smaller amount of polyphenol content remains on the surface. This means that the presence of WPC with MD improved MD efficiency as a carrier of polyphenols constituents13.
Microcapsules morphology: The result of Fig. 1 shows the surface morphology of spray-dried MPPE microcapsules captured with SEM. It could be observed that microcapsules have irregular shapes, mostly spherical structures with small surface indentations and wrinkles. It was found that the type of wall materials is the most important factor which affects the appearance of capsules. The MPPE microcapsules which contained MD as a wall material (Fig. 1a, b) appeared mostly spherical structure and more smooth than the used combination of MD and WPC while images of Fig. 1c-f appeared spherical shape and apparent cracks. This was indicated to low in the permeability of MPPE microcapsules to gases which provide extra protection and retention of the core material (polyphenols). These results are in agreed with our previous finding El-Messery34. Moreover, the variable sizes are a typical characteristic of particles produced by spray drying. Similar morphological characteristics of spray-dried microcapsules were found in previous research of Eratte35.
Physicochemical properties of milk beverage: The total solids, protein, fat, ash, pH and acidity of supplemented milk beverage with MPPE microcapsules during 2 weeks of storage are presented in Table 4. The total solids of milk beverage samples were 16.66, 17.450, 18.540 and 19.700% for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The protein content of milk beverage samples was 5.550, 5.520, 5.325 and 5.575% for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The fat content of milk beverage samples was 6.160, 6.260, 6.275 and 6.370% for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The ash content of milk beverage samples were 0.935, 1.025, 1.145 and 1.225% for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. It is evident from the results, the supplemented milk beverages had a higher content of total solids, protein, fat and ash as a result of MPPE microcapsules addition than the control sample.
It is due to the presence of WPC and MD used in the microencapsulation process. There was no great difference in the chemical composition of all samples after two weeks of storage compared to 0 days. These results are in agreement with Salama et al.36.
Thus, measuring pH values are important for the supplemented milk beverage samples because the pH affects the physicochemical stability.
Table 4: Physicochemical properties of milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules | |||||||
Treatments* | Storage period | Total solids% | Protein % | Fat % | Ash % | pH | Titratable acidity% |
Control | Fresh | 16.66±0.11 | 5.550±0.13 | 6.16±0.04 | 0.935±0.04 | 6.055±0.06 | 0.185±0.07 |
T1 | 17.450±0.13 | 5.520±0.08 | 6.260±0.02 | 1.025±0.02 | 6.470±0.03 | 0.216±0.04 | |
T2 | 18.540±0.07 | 5.325±0.10 | 6.275±0.03 | 1.145±0.05 | 6.445±0.07 | 0.227±0.02 | |
T3 | 19.700±0.10 | 5.575±0.05 | 6.370±0.08 | 1.225±0.03 | 6.245±0.02 | 0.242±0.04 | |
Control | 2 Weeks | 16.690±0.13 | 5.555±0.04 | 6.025±0.08 | 0.940±0.04 | 6.250±0.01 | 0.245±0.07 |
T1 | 17.50±0.07 | 5.570±0.02 | 6.165±0.1 | 1.060±0.02 | 6.320±0.01 | 0.263±0.03 | |
T2 | 18.630±0.10 | 5.545±0.01 | 6.235±0.06 | 1.130±0.02 | 6.245±0.03 | 0.274±0.06 | |
T3 | 19.575±0.04 | 5.605±0.04 | 6.285±0.02 | 1.240±0.07 | 6.045±0.05 | 0.295±0.06 | |
The mean values (± S.D.), (n = 3). MPPE = Mango Peel Phenolic Extract. * Control = Plain milk without MPPE microcapsules, T1 = Milk + MPPE microcapsules 1% (v/w), T2 = Milk+ MPPE microcapsules 2% (v/w) and T3 = Milk+ MPPE microcapsules 3% (v/w). |
![]() |
Fig. 1: | Surface morphology of MPPE microcapsules MPPE: Mango peel phenolic extract, A: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:10, B: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:20, C: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:10, D: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:20, E: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:10, F: MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:20 |
Table 5: | TPC, TFC and antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP) of MPPE microcapsules and milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion (oral, gastric and intestinal phase) |
TPC (mg catechin g1) | TFC (mg rutin g1) | DPPH (μmol trolox g1) | FRAP (μmol Trolox g1) | |||||||||
Experiments | Oral | Gastric | Intestinal | Oral | Gastric | Intestinal | Oral | Gastric | Intestinal | Oral | Gastric | Intestinal |
MPPE microcapsules* | ||||||||||||
F1 | 1.43±0.01 | 1.81±0.00 | 2.72±0.01 | 5.89±0.10 | 6.11±0.83 | 12.22±0.41 | 0.93±0.09 | 1.45±0.02 | 1.49±0.38 | 3.79±0.08 | 4.13±0.38 | 5.15±0.36 |
F2 | 1.42±0.04 | 1.75±0.01 | 2.66±0.02 | 3.69±0.14 | 5.39±1.73 | 13.29±0.79 | 1.13±0.01 | 1.41±0.07 | 1.66±0.01 | 2.47±0.09 | 3.94±0.38 | 5.01±0.33 |
F3 | 1.50±0.05 | 1.93±0.05 | 2.81±0.02 | 4.65±0.78 | 6.41±0.44 | 17.08±0.20 | 1.03±0.08 | 1.00±0.27 | 3.66±0.05 | 3.73±0.66 | 4.05±0.29 | 5.21±0.19 |
F4 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.51±0.00 | 2.75±0.02 | 6.93±1.53 | 7.86±1.40 | 14.85±0.56 | 1.03±0.17 | 1.13±0.17 | 3.62±0.05 | 2.49±0.45 | 4.00±0.20 | 4.99±0.17 |
F5 | 1.50±0.01 | 1.53±0.03 | 2.83±0.02 | 5.63±0.09 | 12.41±1.72 | 15.92±2.36 | 1.09±0.06 | 1.42±0.25 | 3.57±0.04 | 3.39±0.22 | 4.16±0.23 | 5.12±0.26 |
F6 | 1.48±0.01 | 1.53±0.04 | 2.78±0.00 | 6.57±0.09 | 14.84±1.86 | 14.87±1.15 | 1.03±0.03 | 1.98±0.15 | 3.64±0.37 | 2.89±0.18 | 3.93±0.20 | 4.75±0.80 |
Milk beverage** | ||||||||||||
T1 | 2.10±0.17 | 3.18±0.77 | 5.13±0.68 | 5.44±2.00 | 47.51±7.75 | 60.51±0.86 | 0.20±0.26 | 1.30±0.03 | 1.66±0.13 | 0.21±0.10 | 2.15±0.55 | 3.78±0.41 |
T2 | 2.19±0.09 | 3.45±0.99 | 7.65±0.21 | 7.91±2.55 | 45.44±3.51 | 66.93±0.43 | 1.17±0.02 | 1.32±0.03 | 1.67±0.15 | 0.53±0.11 | 3.04±0.48 | 3.42±0.82 |
T3 | 2.42±0.06 | 6.36±0.07 | 8.25±0.29 | 6.62±0.06 | 46.53±4.05 | 64.61±1.03 | 1.10±0.00 | 1.34±0.00 | 1.67±0.02 | 0.85±0.11 | 3.52±0.21 | 3.87±0.17 |
Mean values (±S.D.), (n = 3). MPPE: Mango peel phenolic extract, TPC: Total phenolic content, TFC: Total flavonoid content, DPPH: 2, 2!-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical, FRAP: Ferric reducing antioxidant power, *F1 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:10, F2 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD 100%) 1:20, F3 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:10, F4 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 80:20) 1:20, F5 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:10, F6 = MPPE powder: wall materials (MD:WPC 60:40) 1:20, **Control = Plain milk without MPPE microcapsules, T1 = Milk+MPPE microcapsules 1% (v/w), T2 = Milk+MPPE microcapsules 2% (v/w), T3 = Milk+MPPE microcapsules 3% (v/w) |
![]() |
Fig. 2: | The viscosity of milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules |
The pH values of milk beverage samples were 6.055, 6.470, 6.445 and 6.24 for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The titratable acidity values of milk beverage samples were 0.185, 0.216, 0.227 and 0.242% for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The supplemented milk beverages had lower pH values and higher acidity compared to the control sample. After 2 weeks of storage, the pH values of all samples were decreased while the acidity concurrently increased. These results are in agreement with Hassan et al.37.
Viscosity is an important measure of beverages and one of the most important factors that attract the consumer and evaluate the extent of his acceptance. The result of Fig. 2 presented the viscosity of milk beverages containing different concentrations of MPPE microcapsules (1, 2 and 3%).
The viscosity of milk beverage samples was 2.027, 2.50, 2.70 and 6.4 cP for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively in 0 days while after 15 days of storage the viscosity was 2.40, 5.64, 8.50 and 14.47 cP for control, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The viscosity of all samples whether fresh or during storage increased dramatically as a result of the addition of MPPE microcapsules. This is due to an increase in the total solids (as presented in Table 1 where MD and WPC were used as wall materials that can bind water, which increases the viscosity of the medium. These results are agreed with Salama et al.36.
In vitro gastrointestinal digestion: In vitro, gastrointestinal digestion models are useful for evaluating the biological activity and the stability of phenolic compounds and other endogenous factors. The stability of Polyphenols and subsequently their bioaccessibility can be influenced by the method of food processing, microbiota and digestive enzymes38.
Phenolic and flavonoid compounds: The data of Table 5 showed the impact of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion simulation on TPC and TFC of MPPE microcapsules and milk beverage samples. It is observed that the TPC increased strongly after the intestinal digestion phase for MPPE microcapsules (2.72, 2.66, 2.81, 2.75, 2.83 and 2.78 mg catechin g1 for F1 to F6, respectively) and milk beverage samples (5.13, 7.65 and 8.25 mg catechin g1 for T1, T2 and T3, respectively) compared to the oral phase. The previous trend was observed in the evaluation of TFC which increased after the intestinal digestion phase for MPPE microcapsules (12.22, 13.29, 17.08, 14.85, 15.95 and 14.87 mg Rutin g1 for F1 to F6, respectively) and milk beverage samples (60.51, 66.93 and 64.61 mg Rutin g1 for T1, T2 and T3, respectively) compared to the oral phase. This is due to the short time that the samples stay in the oral phase (about 2 min), insufficient solubility in the saliva fluid and therefore the amount released from phenolic compounds is small39. However, the phenolic compounds were released in a large amount in the milk beverage samples after the intestinal phase compared to the MPPE microcapsules. Hence, this result means that the milk beverage samples are protected against the condition changes of digestion such as pH variations and the type of enzyme. These results are in agreement with our previous study Farrg13, the effect of total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in the grape were studied during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion.
Antioxidant activity: The results of antioxidants activity in both the DPPH and FRAP assays for MPPE microcapsules and supplemented milk beverage during gastrointestinal digestion are shown in Table 5. The Antioxidant Activity (AA) values using the DPPH method in MPPE microcapsules after the intestinal digestion phase were 1.49, 1.66, 3.66, 3.62, 3.57 and 3.64 μmol Trolox g1 for F1-F6, respectively while The AA values of the supplemented milk beverage samples after the intestinal digestion phase were 1.66, 1.67 and 1.67 μmol Trolox g1 for T1, T2 and T3 respectively. The FRAP values in MPPE microcapsules after intestinal digestion were 5.515, 5.01, 5.21, 4.99, 5.12 and 4.75 μmol Trolox g1 for F1 to F6, respectively while the FRAP values in milk beverage samples after intestinal digestion were 3.78, 3.42 and 3.87 μmol Trolox g1 for T1, T2 and T3, respectively compared to the oral phase.
It was observed that the antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP) in MPPE microcapsules was higher compared to the supplemented milk beverage during the oral, gastric and intestinal phases. Also, the antioxidant activity of both MPPE microcapsules and supplemented milk beverages were increased after the oral phase. This is could be attributed to the high releasing of bioactive compounds, with scavenging properties, from the samples under the acidic conditions of gastric digestion. Thereby, during the digestive process, antioxidant compounds could be more reactive particularly at acidic pH (gastric medium) than at neutral pH (intestinal medium), which could increase with pH in other compounds40. Furthermore, the phenolic compounds have a chemical structure that plays a role in the free radical-scavenging activity (DPPH) and Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) which is mainly dependent on the position and number of hydroxyl groups on the phenolic molecules aromatic rings41. These results are in agreement with Correa-Betanzo42 and Chen43, which observed increasing the DPPH and FRAP values after the gastric phase of digestion for blueberry extracts and fruit seeds, respectively.
In vivo experiment: The liver is considered as the fundamental organ where detoxified toxins, drugs and nourishments or metabolized44. It is associated with numerous functional proteins, essential vitamins, lipids and lifesaving antibodies creation45,46. In this study, carbon tetrachloride was used to incite liver dysfunction in rat model47, where it can harm typical metabolic pathways by enacting the ROS framework. It was noticed that there was a slight decrease in total food intake in groups 1, 2 and 3 (439, 441 and 442 g, respectively) and there wasn’t a massive difference in the initial body weight (177.8, 178.5 and 176.5 g, respectively) final body weight (196.8, 195.5 and 198.5 g, respectively) and body weight gain (19, 17 and 22 g, respectively) compared to animal control (+ve) (Table 6). Also, it was observed a decrease in food efficiency in groups 1 (0.043) and 2 (0.039) compared to animal control (+ve) (0.049). These results are agreement with findingsYao48.
The lipid peroxide level was high in groups 1, 2 and 3 (80.7, 83.3 and 85.98 nmol mL1, respectively) compared to the animal's control (+ve) (75.17 nmol mL1) (Table 7). This increase is considered the important underlying cause of the oxidative stress initiation related to various tissue injuries, cell death and the progression of acute and chronic diseases49-51. This result is in agreement with Gamal52 and Sabina53. Also, the lipid peroxide level increased in the animal control (+ve) compared to the normal control. The total antioxidant was higher in groups 1, 2 and 3 (0.83, 0.84 and 0.90 mM L1, respectively) compared to animal control (+ve) (0.79 mM L1) and there wasn’t a massive difference between the animal control (+ve) and the normal control (0.77 mM L1).
The catalase level was decreased in animal control (+ve) (15.26 U min1) compared to the normal control while an increase of catalase level was observed in groups 1, 2 and 3 (23.33, 25.17 and 30.21 U min1, respectively) compared to animal control (+ve).
Table 6: Effect of milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules on the body weight, body gain, total food intake and food efficiency | |||||
Group* | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | Body gain (g) | Total food intake (g) | Food efficiency |
Control (-ve) | 173.5±1.15 | 195.2±2.45 | 21.7±1.3 | 443±2.65 | 0.049±0.491 |
Group (+ve) | 175.32±2.11 | 197±2.31 | 21.68±0.2 | 435±2.5 | 0.049±0.08 |
Group 1 | 177.8±1.41 | 196.8±2.48 | 19±1.07 | 439±1.25 | 0.043±0.856 |
Group 2 | 178.5±1.35 | 195.5±1.91 | 17±0.56 | 441±1.61 | 0.039±0.349 |
Group 3 | 176.5±1.41 | 198.5±2.11 | 22±0.7 | 442±1.61 | 0.049±0.435 |
Mean ± SE, * Control (-ve) = Normal rats fed on the basal synthetic diet that served as -ve control, Control (+ve) = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and plain milk beverage every day by oral intubation for 2 weeks that served as +ve control. Group 1 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T1 by oral intubation for 2 weeks, Group 2 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T2 by oral intubation for 2 weeks, Group 3 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T3 by oral intubation for 2 weeks |
Table 7: Effect of milk beverage supplemented with MPPE microcapsules on lipid peroxide, total antioxidant, catalase, ALT, AST, ALP and creatinine | |||||||
Lipid peroxide | Total antioxidant | Catalase | Creatinine | ||||
Group** | (nmol mL1) | (mM L1) | (U min1) | ALT* (U L1) | AST* (U L1) | ALP* (U L1) | (mg dL1) |
Control (-ve) | 40.51±1.73 | 0.77±0.032 | 35.88±3.11 | 25.5±2.85 | 30.3±4.22 | 55.43±4.55 | 0.55±0.25 |
Group (+ve) | 75.17±2.55 | 0.79±0.049 | 15.26±1.19 | 132.15±10.12 | 98.78±7.15 | 153.28±9.15 | 0.95±3.22 |
Group 1 | 80.7±2.71 | 0.83±0.032 | 23.33±1.08 | 65.28±3.1 | 65.24±4.23 | 125.29±6.23 | 0.69±0.07 |
Group 2 | 83.33±1.39 | 0.84±0.081 | 25.17±1.25 | 53.5±1.33 | 50.25±3.78 | 95.33±3.28 | 0.55±0.14 |
Group 3 | 85.98±1.35 | 0.90±0.051 | 30.21±1.45 | 44.3±1.08 | 40.39±3.65 | 64.19±2.31 | 0.45±0.11 |
Mean ± SE, *ALT = Alanine aminotransferase, AST = Aspartate aminotransferase and ALP = Alkaline phosphatase, **Control (-ve) = Normal rats fed on the basal synthetic diet that served as -ve control. Control (+ve) = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and plain milk beverage every day by oral intubation for 2 weeks that served as +ve control. Group 1 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T1 by oral intubation for 2 weeks, Group 2 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T2 by oral intubation for 2 weeks, Group 3 = Induced rats fed on the basal synthetic diet and T3 by oral intubation for 2 weeks |
From the results, it is clear MPPE microcapsules had potential protection against oxidative stress by reestablishment the endogenous antioxidants in the tissues54. The antioxidant and anti-lipid peroxidation properties of MPPE microcapsules could be attributed to its constituent of flavonoids and other polyphenolics55.
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were higher in the animal control (+ve) (132.15, 98.78 and 153.28 U L1, respectively) compared to the normal control (25.5, 30.3 and 55.43 U L1, respectively) while ALT, AST and ALP levels decreased in groups 1, 2 and 3 compared to animal control (+ve). AST and ALT levels were decreased in the animal control (+ve) which attributed to the damaged structural integrity of the liver56.
Creatinine level was higher in the animal control (+ve) (0.95 mg dL1) compared to the normal control (0.55 mg dL1) while the Creatinine level was lower in groups 1, 2 and 3 (0.69, 0.55 and 0.45 mg dL1, respectively) compared to animal control (+ve). This may due to CCl4 which destroys the membrane and led to massive hepatic enzyme leakage (AST, ALT and ALP) associated with immune cell infiltration, massive centrilobular apoptosis, ballooning degeneration and cell death57. The reduction of elevated liver marker enzyme activity would be beneficial for liver stability58.
The results showed the possibility of using Mango Peel Phenolic Extract (MPPE) is a rich source of phenolic and flavonoids compounds and antioxidants in microcapsules to fortify a milk beverage product with them, which hadn’t an immense effect on the chemical and physical properties. Fortification of the milk beverage with MPPE protected them during the simulation digestive process as well as reduced the oxidative stress damage in the experimental rats. Moreover, the use of this waste is an efficient strategy in developing novel functional food, with improved quality attributes and functional roles.
Mango peel is a by-product of the mango beverage industry, which is a rich source of bioactive compounds. Since these compounds are difficult to add to the food product due to the speed of damage as well as their instability during digestion, the process of encapsulation is the optimum solution to use it. Through the results, the MPPE microcapsules were more stable during the digestion process as well as the milk beverage supplemented with these capsules. In vivo study, the MPPE microcapsules prevented oxidative stress and inflammation in a rat model. Our data had shown that group 3 was the best treatment that improved the hepatic changes produced by CCl4 administration and could be used in treating patients who are susceptible to the oxidative stress that leads to liver function disorders.
This study reveals the possibility of using mango peel to obtain bioactive compounds that have promising effects in therapeutics. Also, the optimal combination of whey protein concentrate and maltodextrin were detected to obtain the highest efficiency of the encapsulation process of the bioactive compounds extracted from mango peel. By simulating the digestion process, the amount released from these compounds in the capsule was known at each digestion stage (oral, gastric and intestinal). Also, it was discovered that the milk beverage supplemented with these capsules has a positive effect to reduce the oxidative stress in the experimental rats. Thus, a new theory on supplemented dairy product as therapeutic may be arrived at.
This paper is based upon work supported by Science, Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) under grant short-Term Fellowship Cycle 6 No. 25311.
zinaw zewdie teketelew Reply
good idea