• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Dairy Science
  2. Vol 16 (1), 2021
  3. 1-10
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Dairy Science

Year: 2021 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-10
DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2021.1.10
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Functional Properties and in vitro Bio-Accessibility Attributes of Light Ice Cream Incorporated with Purple Rice Bran

Marwa M. El-Said Marwa  M. El-Said's LiveDNA, Tamer M. El-Messery Tamer  M. El-Messery's LiveDNA and Heba H. Salama Heba  H. Salama's LiveDNA

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: The consumption of purple rice has become popular where the bran contains a high amount of fibers, vitamins, minerals and bioactive components such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids and antioxidants. This research aims to produce light ice cream using Purple Rice Bran (PRB) as a fat replacer and source of bioactive components. Materials and Methods: The ice cream formulations were assessed for the physicochemical properties, the content of bioactive components (antioxidants, phenolic compounds and flavonoids) and sensory characteristics. Also, in vitro bioaccessibility of the bioactive components was evaluated during the oral and gastrointestinal digestion. Results: The ice cream formulations supplemented with PRB contained a high content of total solids, protein, ash and fiber. Furthermore, the addition of PRB had a slight effect on the physical properties of ice cream. Ice cream supplemented with PRB contained a significant increase in the total phenolic compounds, flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP assay) compared to the plain ice cream (without PRB). The addition of PRB in the ice cream formulation didn't have a significant impact on sensory characteristics. In the stimulation digestion, the release of phenolic, flavonoids and antioxidants compounds from the ice cream samples supplemented with PRB was in a higher amount compared to the control sample. Conclusion: The overall results indicated that PRB can display a favorable natural factor to produce novel light ice cream with health benefits.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Copyright: © 2021. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How to cite this article

Marwa M. El-Said, Tamer M. El-Messery and Heba H. Salama, 2021. Functional Properties and in vitro Bio-Accessibility Attributes of Light Ice Cream Incorporated with Purple Rice Bran. International Journal of Dairy Science, 16: 1-10.

DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2021.1.10

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijds.2021.1.10

INTRODUCTION


With the increased food awareness and the spread of different social media, the consumer has become sufficiently educated in the food culture1, which has led to his constant search for healthy, low-calorie, especially low-fat food products2-4. This is has made a continuous struggle between finding new food products that meet the needs of consumers in terms of delicious and attractive taste as well as nutritional and health values5,6. Dairy manufacturers, producers and researchers are constantly trying to produce products for a different structure that is low in fat or free fat and at the same time high in health and nutritional value3,7,8. Ice cream is a refreshing, nutritious and also popular dairy product that may be eaten a lot by different age groups, especially children and they are the most beloved category of these products9. For these reasons, there have been many attempts through studies to produce ice cream for a low-fat, low-calorie and high nutritional and healthy. The traditional ice cream formulations had 10-16% fat which can be substituted by different types of fat replacers10. Many studies have confirmed that foods contain low fat and fiber can reducing and protecting the injury of colon cancer, obesity, cardiovascular diseases and other disturbances8. Many fat alternatives have been used in the manufacture of ice cream such as inulin11; soy protein hydrolysate/xanthan gum12; maltodextrin13, maltodextrin combined with inulin14; polydextrose15, milk proteins16, dietary fibers17, a combination between starch with β-glucan18 and starches19; etc. Dietetic fibers have been used in different dairy products as fat substitutes20. Carbohydrates based on fat substitutes can hold water; raise the viscosity and improving the texture3. Purple rice (Oryza saitva L. var. glutinosa) is a domestic Thai agricultural product distinguished by the purple pigments in the bran. The Purple Rice Bran (PRB) contains a high amount of valuable phytochemicals and micronutrients. Several types of research pointed to the purple rice contain a high level of phytochemicals such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, tocopherols free fatty acids21,22 also, these compounds had an important role in the inhibition of growth-cancer cell23. Food rich in phenolic compounds is associated with reducing the risk of many diseases, such as diabetes (type-2) and atherosclerosis24. The bioavailability of phenolic compounds is the main issue where show the beneficial effects. However, the bioavailability varies completely from one phenolic compound to another which depends on the source of these compounds. The bioavailability of any compound relies on its digestive stability, liberation from the food system and its efficiency passing through an epithelium25.

With an increased need for more natural and healthy products, this research was carried out to elucidate the possibility of purple rice bran as a fat replacer and a source of bioactive compounds to produce functional ice cream with acceptable sensory attributes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study area: The present study was conducted during July-September, 2020 at the Department of Dairy, Food Industries and Nutrition Division, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Materials: Purple rice was purchased from the local supermarket in Chiang Mai, Thailand. A polyethylene bag was used to store the separated bran at 28±2°C. Fresh skim buffalo’s milk and cream (fat 33% fat, protein 1.9%, carbohydrate 3%) were obtained from Animal Production Research Institute, Egypt. Low heat skim milk powder (moisture 4%, fat 1.5%, protein 32%, lactose 50% and ash 8%) was obtained from a local market. Commercial cane sugar was obtained from the local market. All chemicals and solvents were obtained from MERCK, USA.

METHODS



HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds in the purple rice bran (PRB): The phenolic compounds of PRB were determined by reversed-phase HPLC with gradient elution. The separation was carried out using a Kromasil C18 column (4.6×250 mm i.d., 5 μm). The mobile phase consisted of water (A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 1 mL min–1. The mobile phase was programmed consecutively in a linear gradient as follows: 0 min (82% A); 0-5 min (80% A); 5-8 min (60% A); 8-12 min (60% A); 12-15 min (85% A) and 15-16 min (82% A). The multi-wavelength detector was monitored at 280 nm. The injection volume was 10 μL for each of the sample solutions. The column temperature was maintained at 35°C26.

Determination of chemical composition and minerals of the PRB: The data in Table 1 is shown the gross composition (moisture, protein, fat, ash and crude fiber) and the minerals content (iron, manganese, zinc, sodium, calcium and potassium) of PRB27. Total carbohydrate was determined based on the differential analysis of moisture, ash, protein and fat.

Preparation of light ice cream with PRB: The basic formulation of ice cream was prepared according to Schmidt28.

Table 1: Proximate composition and minerals of purple rice bran
Constituents (%) Minerals (mg kg–1)
Total solids
88.50
K
2600
Moisture
11.5
Ca
228
Protein
12.5
Na
200
Carbohydrate
17.34
Zn
21
Fat
19.6
Mn
33
Crude fiber
29.5
Fe
24
Ash
9.56

The composition of this formula was milk solids non-fat (MSNF) 12%, fat 10%, sucrose 15%, stabilizer (CMC) 0.2% and emulsifier 0.1%. The ice cream formulations were prepared as follows:

Control: contain milk-fat 10%, T1: contain PRB 2% (w/w) and 7% milk-fat, T2: contain PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 7%, T3: Contain PRB 2% (w/w) and milk-fat 4%, T4: Contain PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 4%. All formulations were heated at 80±1°C for 30 sec then the temperature was reduced to 42°C. Every formulation was kept at 4°C for 2 hrs. To obtain ice cream, previous formulations were whipped for 30 min using an ice cream machine (Model: BL1380) then put in plastic containers (1 L) then frozen at -5.5°C for 2 hrs. The ice cream samples were packed into small cups and then stored at -20±2°C for 24 hrs before analysis.

Physicochemical analysis: All ice cream formulations were evaluated for the total solids, protein, fat, ash and crude fiber as stated by Verma et al.27. pH values were measured using a Jenway 3510 pH meter. The apparent viscosity was measured using Brookfield digital viscometer (Middleboro, MA 02346, USA). According to Marshall9, overrun percent was calculated as described in the following Eq:

Image for - Functional Properties and in vitro Bio-Accessibility Attributes of Light Ice Cream Incorporated with Purple Rice Bran

The specific gravity was determined according to Arbuckle29. Melting properties were determined according to Arndt and Wehling30.

Determination of total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity: The Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC) were determined according to Naczk and Shahidi31 and the results were expressed as mg of (+)-catechin equivalent per gram. The method illustrated by Leong and Shui32 was used to determine DPPH radical-scavenging activity and the results were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalent per gram. Total Flavonoids (TF) were measured according to Djeridane et al.33 and the results were expressed as mg Rutin equivalent per gram. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) was evaluated as stated by Benzie and Strain34 and the results were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalent per gram.

Sensory evaluation: Sensory attributes were characterized according to the method of Arbuckle29. All ice cream samples were evaluated based on flavor (50 points), body and texture (40 points), melting property (5) and appearance (5) by the staff member of the Department of Dairy in the National Research Centre, Egypt.

In vitro gastrointestinal digestion: According to the method illustrated by Oliveira and Pintado35, all ice cream samples were subjected to simulating digestion (oral, gastric and intestinal stage). The oral stage, two gram of ice cream was added to 3200 U mL–1 of porcine α-amylase in carbonate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7). Twenty seconds after the start of the oral stage, the gastric stage initiated using porcine pepsin (3200 U mL–1) in HCl (0.02 M, pH 2) at 37°C for 1 hr. The final stage is ice cream samples were subjected to intestinal stimulated fluids. Pancreatin (2 mg mL–1) in 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer pH 6 and bile salts (12 mg mL–1) was added into the digesta and incubated at 37°C. Fluids from the oral, gastric and intestinal stages were assessed in the total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis for the results was made by SPSS program36 using Duncan’s test where p<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Identification and quantitative phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the purple rice bran (PRB): The data in Table 2 and Fig. 1 showed the phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the PRB using HPLC. The results showed that the PRB contained eight phenolic acids and four flavonoids. The highest Retention Time (RT) peak was Gallic acid (3.328 min) then followed by Chlorogenic acid (4.115 min), Caffeic acid (5.681 min), Syringic acid (6.522 min), Pyro catechol (7.069 min), Rutin (7.421 min), Ellagic acid (7.961 min), Coumaric acid (8.809 min), Vanillin (9.842 min), Ferulic acid (10.099 min), Naringenin (10.273 min) and Taxifolin (12.393 min), respectively.

Image for - Functional Properties and in vitro Bio-Accessibility Attributes of Light Ice Cream Incorporated with Purple Rice Bran
Fig. 1: HPLC chromatograph of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the PRB


Table 2: Phenolic and flavonoid compounds of the PRB
Phenolic compounds
Concentration (μg g–1 rice bran)
Phenolic acid
Gallic acid
2668.06
Chlorogenic acid
1225.84
Caffeic acid
52.85
Syringic acid
497.72
Ellagic acid
74.75
p-Coumaric acid
116.09
Vanillic acid
188.40
Ferulic acid
524.67
Total phenolic acids
5348.38
Flavonoids
Pyro catechol
292.52
Rutin
472.60
Naringenin
464.99
Taxifolin
135.52
Total flavonoids
1365.63
Methyl gallate
37.67
Total phenolic compounds
6751.68

The Gallic acid recorded the highest concentration (2668.06 μg g–1 PRB) then Chlorogenic acid (1225.84 μg g–1 PRB), Ferulic acid (524.67 μg g–1 PRB), Syringic acid (497.72 μg g–1 PRB), Vanillic acid (188.40 μg g–1 PRB), p-Coumaric acid (116.09 μg g–1 PRB) and Ellagic acid (74.75 μg g–1 PRB) respectively whereas Caffeic acid was recorded the lowest concentration (52.85 μg g–1 PRB). The highest concentration of flavonoids in the PRB sample was Rutin (472.60 μg g–1 PRB) then Naringenin (464.99 μg g–1 PRB), Pyro catechol (292.52 μg g–1 PRB) and Taxifolin (135.52 μg g–1 PRB), respectively. The total amount of flavonoids identified and quantified in the PRB was 1365.63 (μg g–1), corresponding to the 5348.38 (μg g–1) of total phenolic compounds. These results are in agreement with the finding of Tian et al.26.

Physicochemical characteristics: The chemical composition and physical properties of ice cream samples with or without PRB were shown in Table 3. It is evident from the results that, there is a significant difference (p<0.05) between the supplemented ice cream samples and control sample (without PRB) in total solids where the total solids values for the control, T1, T2, T3 and T4 were 39.27, 36.14, 40.26, 35.68 and 40.14%, respectively and still T2 was the highest in its total solids content (40.26%). The high total solids in the supplemented samples is due to the high content of PRB, where the total solids content in it was 88.5% (Table 1). The same trend was observed when estimating protein, ash and fiber in ice cream samples. The supplemented samples with PRB had high content in protein, ash and fibers than the control sample and T2 still the highest content in protein (4.44%), ash (1.64%) and fiber (1.81%). This is due to the high protein, ash and fiber content of PRB which was 12.50, 9.56 and 29.50% respectively (Table 1). These results are in agreement with Temiz and YeşilSu37 and Cody et al.38. It can be seen from Table 3, there wasn’t a significant difference (p<0.05) between control and the supplemented samples in pH values where the pH values were 6.91, 6.77, 6.85, 6.80 and 6.84 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively.

Table 3: Physicochemical properties of ice cream incorporating the PRB
Experiments
Characteristics
Control
T1
T2
T3
T4
Moisture (%)
60.73±0.03a
63.87±0.02a
59.74±0.01a
64.33±0.02a
59.87±0.02a
Total solids (%)
39.27±0.03c
36.14±0.02d
40.26±0.01a
35.68±0.02e
40.14±0.02b
Protein (%)
1.33±0.01d
1.54±0.01c
4.44±0.02a
1.51±0.01c
4.37±0.02b
Fat (%)
10.25±0.07a
7.30±0.14b
7.30±0.14b
4.25±0.07c
4.05±0.07c
pH
6.91±0.01a
6.77±0.12a
6.85±0.01a
6.80±0.01a
6.84±0.01a
Ash (%)
1.13±0.01d
1.24±0.02b
1.64±0.01a
1.19±0.01c
1.64±0.02a
Fiber (%)
-
0.57±0.02b
1.81±0.01a
0.52±0.01c
1.80±0.01a
Overrun (%)
70.91±0.64c
75.45±1.47b
84.30±1.48a
70.89±1.51c
75.45±1.28b
Specific gravity
0.84±0.01b
0.86±0.02b
0.94±0.03a
0.75±0.01c
0.76±0.02c
Melting resistance (%)
5 min
0.96±0.01d
7.40±0.07a
7.03±0.04b
0.70±0.01e
4.38±0.04c
10 min
13.50±0.39d
25.91±0.03a
19.73±0.15c
12.26±0.05e
22.50±0.14b
15 min
30.64±0.51b
42.63±0.11a
33.65±0.04c
24.69±0.05d
38.25±0.21b
20 min
0.96±0.05d
7.40±0.28a
7.03±0.26b
0.70±0.04e
48.26±0.37c
25 min
60.43±0.43b
62.03±0.08a
48.08±0.11d
50.29±0.05c
50.07±0.06c
30 min
0.96±0.05d
7.40±0.01a
7.03±0.07b
0.70±0.1e
4.38±0.02c
Results are expressed as the mean (n = 3). Means with different letters in a row are significantly different (p<0.05). Control: Ice cream without PRB, T1: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and 7% milk-fat, T2: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 7%, T3: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and milk-fat 4%, T4: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 4%

This means that the addition of PRB in the ice cream formulation hadn’t affected the pH values and these results are consistent with the finding of Salama et al.39,40.

Also, the results showed that the specific gravity values were increased with an increase in the PRB level in the ice cream samples compared to the control sample where the specific gravity values were 0.84, 0.86, 0.94, 0.75 and 0.76 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively and T2 had the highest the specific gravity value (0.94) than all ice cream samples. These results are in agreement with El-Kholy41. He studied the effect of substituting milk fat with pomegranate peel in frozen yoghurt and determined the quality of a final product. He stated that the air has a massive effect on the ice cream density, therefore, blending air in the ice cream mixture before the freezing process reduces the specific gravity of the produce ice cream and so, the specific gravity of the ice cream mixture was higher than the resultant ice cream. These results are consented with finding Abd El-Rashid and Hassan42.

Overrun is an important economic estimate in the frozen desserts. However, the overrun values were increased significantly (p<0.05) in the supplemented samples with PRB compared to the control sample where the overrun values were 70.91,75.45, 84.30, 70.89 and 75.45% for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively and T2 has gained the highest overrun value (84.30%) than other samples. This may due to the increasing level of PRB in the ice cream mixture which led to increase in the total solids of the ice cream formula which was followed by an increase in the overrun.

The melting rate of ice cream is one of the most important factors that influence the sensory evaluation of the final product43. However, many factors affect the melting rate, including the composition of the ice cream, the shape and size of the ice crystals and the fat particles during the freezing process, the additives and the overrun44. It is noticed from the results, the addition of PRB to ice cream formulation increased significantly (p<0.05) the melting resistance of ice cream. It was found that the supplemented samples with PRB (T1, T2, T3 and T4) were resistant to melt and took a long time to melt and followed by a control sample. This may be due to the high solids content of the supplemented samples, which include some starch from the PRB. These results in agreement with the finding of El-Samahy et al.45, they found that the ice cream samples supplemented with pomegranate peel melted more slowly compared to the control sample. Usually, decreasing the melting rate indicates the quality of ice cream and processed amla46.

Viscosity: One of the most important features that have a role in evaluating the quality of ice cream is the viscosity which has a responsibility for the desired body and texture of ice cream. Therefore, the measurement of viscosity is important to know the effect of addition PRB on the ice cream attributes. It could be seen in the present study the addition of PRB significantly (p<0.05) affected the viscosity behavior of the ice cream samples (Fig. 2). The viscosity of the supplemented samples was higher than the control sample (T2>T4>T1>T3>control) and T2 was the highest value. These results could be attributed to the high fiber content of PRB, which holds extra water thus increasing the viscosity of the final product. These results are in agreement with the finding of Erkaya et al.47, Yangılar48.

Table 4: Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC), Total Flavonoids Content (TFC) and antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAP) of ice cream incorporating PRB
Experiments
TPC (mg catechin g–1 ice cream)
TFC (mg rutin g–1 ice cream)
DPPH (μmol trolox g–1 ice cream)
FRAP (μmol trolox g–1 ice cream)
Control
0.221±0.14e
ND*
0.0236±0.26e
0.057±0.45e
T1
0.471±0.18d
0.253±0.18c
0.327±0.33d
0.452±0.11d
T2
0.794±0.45b
0.453±0.13b
0.603±0.59b
0.465±0.23b
T3
0.497±0.25c
0.246±0.63d
0.354±0.46c
0.460±0.37c
T4
0.812±0.23a
0.463±0.17a
0.630±0.26a
0.795±0.40a
Results are expressed as Mean±STD (n = 3). Means with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05). *ND: Not detected, Control: Ice cream without PRB, T1: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and 7% milk-fat, T2: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 7%, T3: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and milk-fat4%, T4: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk-fat 4%


Table 5: Sensory attributes of ice cream incorporating PRB
Experiments
Flavor (50)
Body and texture (40)
Melting properties (5)
Appearance (5)
Total score (100)
Control
38.90±0.63d
32.49±0.54b
2.75±0.07d
3.35±0.21c
77.49±0.05c
T1
44.76±0.31b
35.59±0.27a
3.60±0.14bc
4.20±0.14b
88.15±0.86b
T2
46.35±0.47a
36.50±0.54a
4.30±0.28a
4.75±0.21a
91.90±0.57a
T3
41.73±0.37c
33.62±0.52b
3.40±0.28c
3.50±0.14c
82.25±1.32c
T4
45.54±0.58ab
35.50±0.68a
3.95±0.07ab
4.60±0.28ab
89.59±0.91b
Results are expressed as Mean±STD (n = 3). Different superscript lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05). Control: Ice cream without PRB, T1: Ice cream with fat 7% and PRB 2% (w/w), T2: Ice cream with fat 7% and PRB 4% (w/w), T3: Ice cream with fat 4% and PRB 2% (w/w), T4: Ice cream with fat 4% and PRB 4% (w/w)


Image for - Functional Properties and in vitro Bio-Accessibility Attributes of Light Ice Cream Incorporated with Purple Rice Bran
Fig. 2: The viscosity of ice cream
Results are expressed as the mean (n = 3). Control: Ice cream without PRB, T1: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and 7% milkfat, T2: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk fat 7%, T3: Ice cream contains PRB 2% (w/w) and milk fat4%, T4: Ice cream contains PRB 4% (w/w) and milk fat 4%

Total phenolic compounds (TPC), total flavonoids content (TFC) and antioxidant activity (AA): The total phenolic, flavonoid compounds and antioxidant activity using DDPH and FRAP methods of ice cream samples were shown in Table 4. From the results, it was found that the control sample had antioxidant activity and phenolic content. This may be due to the presence of antioxidants in milk which are derived from protein (tyrosine, tryptophan and phosphoserine residues), minerals (such as Zinc and Phosphorus), fat (α-tocopherol, Vitamin-E, carotenoids), enzymes (SOD, Catalase, GSH reductase)49. Also, phenolic compounds can be formed in milk during the pasteurization process50,51. The total phenolic compounds for the supplemented samples were 0.471, 0.794, 0.496 and 0.812 mg catechin g–1 for T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively compared to the control sample (0.221 mg catechin g–1) while the total flavonoids for the supplemented samples were 0.252, 0.453, 0.246 and 0.463 mg Rutin g–1 for T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively compared to the control sample. The total phenolic compounds and the total flavonoids in the supplemented samples with PRB were higher compared to the control sample (without PRB), around 2.1-4.6 times more than those found in the control sample. This may due to the presence of PRB which is a rich source of phenolic and flavonoid compounds (Table 2 and Fig. 1), thus the addition of PRB to the ice cream formulation increased the ice cream's content phenolic compounds and flavonoids in an important amount. The antioxidant activity using DPPH was 0.0236, 0.327, 0.602, 0.354 and 0.630 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively while antioxidant activity using FRAP was 0.057, 0.452, 0.465, 0.460 and 0.795 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4 respectively. It was noticed from these results, the DPPH and FRAP values of the ice cream samples increased with an increase in the addition of PRB. Many previous studies indicated that the addition of phenolic sources such as dark cocoa, hazelnut, green tea extracts, sugarcane and grape juice residue could increase the antioxidant activity of ice cream52,53. This may due to the phenolics and flavonoids which presence in PRB is responsible for the powerful antioxidant activity. Also, it is known The DPPH radical scavenging activity is related to the nature of phenolic compounds which are considered a donor of electrons54,55.

Sensory evaluation: Sensory attributes of the ice cream samples supplemented with or without PRB was illustrated in Table 5.

Table 6: Release of phenolic compounds, flavonoids and antioxidants of ice cream incorporating PRB during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion
In vitro gastrointestinal
Experiments
Mouth
Gastric
Intestinal
TPC* (mg Catechin g–1)
Control
0. 277±0.29d
0.342±0.91d
0.340±1.09c
T1
0.587±0.25b
0.671±0.36c
0.835±0.38b
T2
0.907±0.14a
1.044±0.38a
1.192±0.68a
T3
0.575±0.54c
0.654±0.25c
0.843±0.20b
T4
0.915±0.45a
1.038±0.23b
1.181±2.26a
TF* (mg Rutin g–1)
Control
ND*
ND*
ND*
T1
0.334±0.31d
0.404±0.41c
0.606±0.79d
T2
0.519±0.14b
0.695±0.64a
0.806±0.52b
T3
0.344±0.14c
0.400±0.47c
0.623±0.29c
T4
0.530±0.71a
0.648±0.01b
0.835±0.45a
DPPH* (μmol Trolox g–1)
Control
0.772±0.52d
0.172±0.33c
0.251±0.51d
T1
0.418±0.52c
0.783±0.66b
0.865±0.17c
T2
0.835±0.33a
1.003±1.07a
1.143±0.61a
T3
0.438±0.72b
0.796±0.41b
0.875±0.20c
T4
0.838±0.07a
1.016±0.58a
1.126±0.71b
FRAP* (μmol Trolox g–1)
Control
0.125±0.23d
0.242±0.01e
0.315±0.29c
T1
0.559±0.23c
0.845±0.21c
0.944±0.30b
T2
0.944±0.38b
1.054±0.41a
1.155±5.37a
T3
0.566±0.29c
0.823±0.30d
0.926±0.16b
T4
0.966±0.61a
1.035±0.54b
1.176±0.45a
The results are expressed as Mean±STD (n = 3). Different superscript lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05). Control: Ice cream without PRB, T1: Ice cream with fat 7% and PRB 2% (w/w), T2: Ice cream with fat 7% and PRB 4% (w/w), T3: Ice cream with fat 4% and PRB 2% (w/w), T4: Ice cream with fat 4% and PRB 4% (w/w)

The results revealed that the addition of PRB in ice cream formulation had a significant effect on flavor, body and texture, melting properties and appearance. However, ice cream with PRB 2% (T2) had the highest scores in flavor (46.35), body and texture (36.50), melting properties (4.30) and appearance (4.75), as well as total scores (91.90) compared to the control sample (flavor 38.90, body and texture 32.49, melting properties 2.75, appearance 3.35 and total score 77.49). The high acceptability of T2 may be attributed to the PRB, unlike other fibers, which has sweet and delicious savor. However, Anuyahong et al.56 reported yogurt enrich with rice berry extract was improved their content of the phytochemicals without a significant impact on the sensory characteristics.

In vitro bioaccessibility
Phenolic and flavonoid compounds: The Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC) of ice cream with or without PRB during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion are illustrated in Table 6. It is observed that TPC values of all ice cream samples were increased significantly (p<0.05) after the oral phase which was 0.277,0.587,0.907,0.575 and 0.915 mg Catechin g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4. This may due to the content of the samples from the phenolic compounds before digestion. This increase in TPC may due to an increase in the solubility of phenolic compounds or stirring or the enzyme activity during the gastrointestinal conditions stimulated in vitro, all of these could contribute to the breakdown of phenolic compounds of high molecular weight to compounds low in molecular weight which increase TPC57. Likewise to the oral phase, after the gastric digestion step, the TPC of all ice cream samples increased significantly (p<0.05) which were 0.342, 0.671, 1.044, 0.654 and 1.038 mg Catechin g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4. Saura-Calixto58 indicated that during the digestion step, there are many factors like enzyme activity, pH and others that can facilitate the hydrolysis of phenolic compounds which bounded with protein or carbohydrate in the food system. These results indicated that the digestive stage could facilitate the release of phenolic compounds in the ice cream system and these results are in agreement with Rodríguez-Roque et al.59 and Cutrim and Cortez60. However, the TPC of all ice cream samples increased significantly (p<0.05) after pancreatic digestion where were 0.340, 0.835, 1.192, 0.843 and 1.181 mg Catechin g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4. This conduct may be due to the ph of the system (5-5.50) or the enzyme activity or both which promote the liberation of phenolic compounds and increasing their level in the intestinal fluids. The progressive increase of TPC in ice cream samples during in vitro digestion is in the agreement of de Carvalho et al.61, Granato et al.4 and Tagliazucchi et al.62. Also, it was noticed from the results the Total Flavonoids (TF) of the supplemented ice cream samples with PRB were increased after oral digestion where were 0.334, 0.519, 0.344 and 0.530 mg Rutin/g for T1, T2, T3 and T4 (control sample didn’t contain flavonoids). The TF were 0.404, 0.695, 0.400 and 0.648 mg Rutin g–1 for T1, T2, T3 and T4 after gastric digestion while were 0.606, 0.806, 0.623 and 0.835 mg Rutin g–1 for T1, T2, T3 and T4 after pancreatic digestion. The high flavonoids content of the samples is due to high flavonoids in PRB which used as a supplement in the ice cream formulation (Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Antioxidant activity: The results of the antioxidant activity estimated during in vitro digestion are shown in Table 6. The ice creams with PRB had higher antioxidant activity compared to the control sample in both DPPH and FRAP evaluation. After pancreatic digestion, the DPPH values of all the samples increased significantly (p<0.05) (0.251, 0.865, 1.143, 0.875 and 1.126 μmol Trolox g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4) compared to the oral and gastric phases where the DPPH values were 0.772, 0.418, 0.835, 0.438 and 0838 μmol Trolox g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4 after oral digestion. This conduct may be related to liberating antioxidant compounds from milk25. These results are in agreement with the findings of Helal63. They reported at the end of the intestinal digestion step, the fortified yogurt with cinnamon had the highest antioxidant activity. As well, Lafarga et al.64 noticed phenolic compounds had a positive corresponding with FRAP value. Thus, increasing FRAP values in all ice cream samples after gastric (0.242, 0.845, 1.054, 0.823 and 0.242 μmol Trolox g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4) and intestinal digestion (0.315, 0.944, 1.155, 0.926 and 0.315 μmol Trolox g–1 for control, T1, T2, T3 and T4) were related to liberating of polyphenolic compounds from samples. Furthermore, Bouayed et al.65 proposed that increase the antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds during in vitro gastric and intestinal digestion may be due to change from acidic to an alkaline condition which let to remove proton of the hydroxyl radicals exists in the benzene rings.

Indeed, in vitro digestion of the PRB supplemented ice cream resulted in the release of phenolic compounds, flavonoids and antioxidants at the end of the digestion. The amount of these compounds in the supplemented ice cream samples was higher than that found in the control sample (without PRB) (p<0.05). These results showed that the ice cream matrix improves the bioaccessibility of PRB phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidants. The PRB supplemented ice cream can be considered an important source of dietary bioaccessible bioactive components.

CONCLUSION


Purple rice bran was successfully utilized to produce functional ice cream. The chemical and physical properties of ice cream were not significantly affected by the addition of PRB. All ice cream formulas had a high amount of phenolics. The ice cream samples supplemented with PRB exhibit a high content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity than the control sample during gastrointestinal digestion stimulated in vitro. Finally, the supplemented ice cream had considerable potential as a functional dairy product. The results of this research proposed that ice cream can be a good matrix for the delivery of bioactive compounds in PRB. Ice cream is a popular dairy product and had high acceptability in the entire world and it is easy to the addition of PRB as a novel fat substitute and source of bioactive compounds at an industrial scale.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


This study discovered that the addition of purple rice bran to ice cream formulation can be beneficial for the production of light ice cream rich in phenolic and flavonoids content and antioxidants activity. It was also discovered that the release of phenolics and flavonoids compounds increased at the last stage (intestinal) of in vitro gastrointestinal stimulation. This study will help the researchers to uncover the critical areas of assessment of purple rice bran as a functional ingredient in ice cream, which many researchers were not able to explore.

REFERENCES


  1. El-Sayed, H.S., H.H. Salama and A.E. Edris, 2020. Survival of Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 in spray dried functional yogurt powder during processing and storage. J. Saudi Soci. Agric. Sci., 19: 461-467.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Akbari, M., M.H. Eskandari and Z. Davoudi, 2019. Application and functions of fat replacers in low-fat ice cream: A review Trends Food Sci. Technol., 86: 34-40.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  3. Akl, E.M., S.M. Abdelhamid, S.M. Wagdy and H.H. Salama, 2020. Manufacture of functional fat-free cream cheese fortified with probiotic bacteria and flaxseed mucilage as a fat replacing agent. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci., 16: 1393-1403.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Granato, D., F. Shahidi, R. Wrolstad, P. Kilmartin and L.D. Melton, 2018. Antioxidant activity, total phenolics and flavonoids contents: Should we banin vitro screening methods?. Food Chem., 264: 471-475.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Da Cruz, A.G., F.C.A. Buriti, C.H.B. de Souza, J.A.F. Faria and S.M.I. Saad, 2009. Probiotic cheese: Health benefits, technological and stability aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 20: 344-354.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Steenhuis, I.H., W.E. Waterlander and A. de Mul, 2011. Consumer food choices: The role of price and pricing strategies. Public Health Nut., 14: 2220-2226.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Crizel, T.D.M., R.R.D. Araujo, A.D.O. Rios, R. Rech and S.H. Flôres, 2014. Orange fiber as a novel fat replacer in lemon ice cream. Food Sci. Technol., 34: 332-340.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Salama, H.H., S.M. Abdelhamid and N.S. Abd-Rabou, 2020. Probiotic frozen yoghurt supplemented with coconut flour green nanoparticles. Curr. Bioactive Comp., 16: 661-670.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Marshall, G.J., 2003. Trends in the southern annular mode from observations and reanalyses. J. Clim., 16: 4134-4143.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Adapa, S., H. Dingeldein, K.A. Schmidt and T.J. Herald, 2000. Rheological properties of ice cream mixes and frozen ice creams containing fat and fat replacers. J. Dairy Sci., 83: 2224-2229.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  11. Yousefi, M., S. Asadollahi and E. Hosseini, 2018. Investigating the effects of inulin as a carbohydrate based fat replacer on rheological and sensory properties of UHT cream. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res., 6: 87-94.
    Direct Link

  12. Yan, L., D. Yu, R. Liu, Y. Jia, M. Zhang, T. Wu and W. Sui, 2021. Microstructure and meltdown properties of low-fat ice cream: Effects of microparticulated soy protein hydrolysate/xanthan gum (MSPH/XG) ratio and freezing time. J. Food Eng., Vol. 291.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Khan, S., S. Rustagi, S. Choudhary, A. Pandey, M. Kamran, A.K. Khan and A. Singh, 2018. Sucralose and maltodextrin-An altrernative to low fat sugar free ice-cream. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun., 11: 136-143.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Ateteallah, H.A., A.A. Abd-Alla, A.H. Ateteallah and N.A. Hassan, 2020. Physicochemical and sensory properties of low-fat ice cream made with inulin and maltodextrin as fat replacers. J. Food Dairy Sci., 11: 151-156.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Rolon, M.L., A.J. Bakke, J.N. Coupland, J.E. Hayes and R.F. Roberts, 2017. Effect of fat content on the physical properties and consumer acceptability of vanilla ice cream. J. Dairy Sci., 100: 5217-5227.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Yashini, M., C.K. Sunil, S. Sahana, S.D. Hemanth, D. Chidanand and A. Rawson, 2019. Protein-based fat replacers-A review of recent advances. Food Rev. Int.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Akalın, A.S., H. Kesenkas, N. Dinkci, G. Unal, E. Ozer and O. Kınık, 2018. Enrichment of probiotic ice cream with different dietary fibers: Structural characteristics and culture viability. J. Dairy Sci., 101: 37-46.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Rezaei, R., M. Khomeiri, M. Kashaninejad, M. Aalami and M. Mazaheri-Tehrani, 2017. Steady and dynamic rheological behaviour of frozen soy yogurt mix affected by resistant starch and β-glucan. Int. J. Food Prop., 20: S2688-S2695.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. Chen, L., R. Dai, Z. Shan and H. Chen, 2020. Fabrication and characterization of one high-hygroscopicity liquid starch-based mulching materials for facilitating the growth of plant. Carbohydr. Polym., Vol. 230.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  20. Utpott, M., R.R. de Araujo, C.G. Vargas, A.R.N. Paiva, B. Tischer, A. de Oliveira Rios and S.H. Flôres, 2020. Characterization and application of red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel powder as a fat replacer in ice cream. J. Food Proc. Preserv., Vol. 44.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Goufo, P. and H. Trindade, 2014. Rice antioxidants: Phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, tocopherols, tocotrienols, γ‐oryzanol and phytic acid. Food Sci. Nut., 2: 75-104.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Mbanjo, E.G.N., T. Kretzschmar, H. Jones, N. Ereful, C. Blanchard, L.A. Boyd and N. Sreenivasulu, 2020. The genetic basis and nutritional benefits of pigmented rice grain. Front. Gent., Vol. 11.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Pintha, K., S. Yodkeeree, P. Pitchakarn and P. Limtrakul, 2014. Anti-invasive activity against cancer cells of phytochemicals in red jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L.). Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev., 15: 4601-4607.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Santhakumar, A.B., M. Battino and J.M. Alvarez-Suarez, 2018. Dietary polyphenols: Structures, bioavailability and protective effects against atherosclerosis. Food Chem. Toxicol., 113: 49-65.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Tagliazucchi, D., A. Helal, E. Verzelloni and A. Conte, 2016. Bovine milk antioxidant properties: Effect of in vitro digestion and identification of antioxidant compounds. Dairy Sci. Technol., 96: 657-676.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Tian, S., K. Nakamura and H. Kayahara, 2004. Analysis of phenolic compounds in white rice brown rice and germinated brown rice. J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 4808-4813.
    CrossRef

  27. Verma, D.K. and P. Srivastav, 2017. Proximate composition, mineral content and fatty acids analyses of aromatic and non-aromatic Indian rice. Rice Sci., 24: 21-31.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Schmidt, K.A., 2008. Dairy: Ice Cream. In: Food Processing: Principles and Applications, Smith, J.S. and Y.H. Hui (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, ISBN: 9780470289976 Pages: 524
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Arbuckle, W.S., 1986. Calculation of ice cream mixes. In: Ice cream. Arbuckle, W.S., Springer US, Boston, ISBN: 978-1-4615-7224-4, pp: 119-165
    CrossRefDirect Link

  30. Arndt, E.A. and R.L. Wehling, 1989. Development of hydrolyzed and hydrolyzed-isomerized syrups from cheese whey ultrafiltration permeate and their utilization in ice cream. J. Food Sci., 54: 880-884.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Naczk, M. and F. Shahidi, 1989. The effect of methanol-ammonia-water treatment on the content of phenolic acids of canola. Food Chem., 31: 159-164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Leong, L.P. and G. Shui, 2002. An investigation of antioxidant capacity of fruits in Singapore markets. Food Chem., 76: 69-75.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Djeridane, A., M. Yousfi, B. Nadjemi, D. Boutassouna, P. Stocker and N. Vidal, 2006. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem., 97: 654-660.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Benzie, I.F.F. and J.J. Strain, 1996. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem., 239: 70-76.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  35. Oliveira, A. and M. Pintado, 2015. Stability of polyphenols and carotenoids in strawberry and peach yoghurt throughout in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Funct., 6: 1611-1619.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. George, D. and P. Mallery, 2020. IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. 16th Edn., Taylor & Francis, Milton Park, United Kingdom, ISBN: 9780429616327 Pages: 386.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Temiz, H. and A.F. YeşilSu, 2010. Effect of pekmez addition on the physical, chemical and sensory properties of ice cream. Czech J. Food Sci., 28: 538-546.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Cody, T.L., A. Olabi, A.G. Pettingell, P.S. Tong and J.H. Walker, 2007. Evaluation of rice flour for use in vanilla ice cream. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 4575-4585.
    CrossRef

  39. Salama, H.H., S.M. Abdelhamid and R.M.K. El Dairouty, 2019. Coconut bio-yoghurt phytochemical-chemical and antimicrobial-microbial activities. Sciences, 22: 527-536.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Salama, H., M. Elsaid, S.A. Hamid, S. Abozed and M. Mounier, 2020. Effect of fortification with sage loaded liposomes on the chemical, physical, microbiological properties and cytotoxicity of yoghurt. Egypt. J. Chem., 63: 3879-3890.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. El-Kholy, A.M., 2015. Effect of fat replacement by Doum palm fruits on frozen yoghurt quality. World J. Dairy Food Sci., 10: 74-81.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  42. Abd El-Rashid, A. and Z.M.R. Hassan, 2005. Potential utilization and healthy effects of doum palm fruits in ice cream and sesame butter (tehena). Alex. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2: 29-39.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  43. Muse, M.R. and R.W. Hartel, 2004. Ice cream structural elements that affect melting rate and hardness. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 1-10.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  44. Moeenfard, M. and M.M. Tehrani, 2008. Effect of some stabilizers on the physicochemical and sensory properties of ice cream type frozen yogurt. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 4:: 584-589.
    Direct Link

  45. El-Samahy, S.K., K.M. Youssef and T.E. Moussa-Ayoub, 2009. Producing ice cream with concentrated cactus pear pulp: A preliminary study. J. Prof. Assoc. Cactus Dev., 11: 1-12.
    Direct Link

  46. Goraya, R.K. and U. Bajwa, 2015. Enhancing the functional properties and nutritional quality of ice cream with processed amla (Indian gooseberry). J. Food Sci. Technol., 52: 7861-7871.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  47. Erkaya, T., E. Dağdemir and M. Şengul, 2012. Influence of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) addition on the chemical and sensory characteristics and mineral concentrations of ice cream. Food Res. Int., 45: 331-335.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  48. Yangilar, F., 2015. Effects of green banana flour on the physical, chemical and sensory properties of ice cream. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 53: 315-323.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  49. Ignat, I., I. Volf and V.I. Popa, 2011. A critical review of methods for characterisation of polyphenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables. Food Chem., 126: 1821-1835.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  50. El-Said, M.M., H.F. Haggag, H.M.F. El-Din, A.S. Gad and A.M. Farahat, 2014. Antioxidant activities and physical properties of stirred yoghurt fortified with pomegranate peel extracts. Ann. Agric. Sci., 59: 207-212.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  51. Fakhr El-Din, H.M., A.S. Gad, H.F. Haggag, A.M. Farahat and M.M. El-Said, 2017. Production of healthy fermented milk supplemented with natural sources of antioxidants. Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12: 52-63.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  52. Sanguigni, V., M. Manco, R. Sorge, L. Gnessi and D. Francomano, 2017. Natural antioxidant ice cream acutely reduces oxidative stress and improves vascular function and physical performance in healthy individuals. Nutrition, 33: 225-233.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  53. Vitale, M., M. Masulli, A.A. Rivellese, E. Bonora and F. Cappellini et al., 2018. Dietary intake and major food sources of polyphenols in people with type 2 diabetes: The TOSCA.IT Study. Eur. J. Nutr., 57: 679-688.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  54. Brand-Williams, W., M.E. Cuvelier and C. Berset, 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 28: 25-30.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  55. Jaster, H., G.D. Arend, K. Rezzadori, V.C. Chaves, F.H. Reginatto and J.C.C. Petrus, 2018. Enhancement of antioxidant activity and physicochemical properties of yogurt enriched with concentrated strawberry pulp obtained by block freeze concentration. Food Res. Int., 104: 119-125.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  56. Anuyahong, T., C. Chusak, T. Thilavech and S. Adisakwattana, 2020. Postprandial effect of yogurt enriched with anthocyanins from riceberry rice on glycemic response and antioxidant capacity in healthy adults. Nutrients, Vol. 12.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  57. Carbonell-Capella, J.M., M. Buniowska, F.J. Barba, N. Grimi, E. Vorobiev, M.J. Esteve and A. Frígola, 2016. Changes of antioxidant compounds in a fruit juice-Stevia rebaudiana blend processed by pulsed electric technologies and ultrasound. Food Bioprocess Technol., 9: 1159-1168.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  58. Saura-Calixto, F., J. Serrano and I. Goñi, 2007. Intake and bioaccessibility of total polyphenols in a whole diet. Food. Chem., 101: 492-501.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  59. Rodríguez-Roque, M.J., B. de Ancos, R. Sánchez-Vega, C. Sánchez-Moreno, M.P. Cano, P. Elez-Martínez and O. Martín-Belloso, 2016. Food matrix and processing influence on carotenoid bioaccessibility and lipophilic antioxidant activity of fruit juice-based beverages. Food Funct., 7: 380-389.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  60. Cutrim, C.S. and M.A.S.Cortez, 2018. A review on polyphenols: Classification, beneficial effects and their application in dairy products. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 71: 564-578.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  61. de Carvalho, M.W., N.D.A. Arriola, S.S. Pinto, S. Verruck, C.B. Fritzen‐Freire, E.S. Prudêncio and R.D.D.M.C. Amboni, 2019. Stevia-fortified yoghurt: Stability, antioxidant activity and in vitro digestion behaviour. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 72: 57-64.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  62. Tagliazucchi, D., E. Verzelloni, D. Bertolini and A. Conte, 2010. In vitro bio-accessibility and antioxidant activity of grape polyphenols. Food Chem., 120: 599-606.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  63. Helal, A. and D. Tagliazucchi, 2018. Impact of in-vitro gastro-pancreatic digestion on polyphenols and cinnamaldehyde bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity in stirred cinnamon-fortified yogurt LWT - Food Sci. Technol., 89: 164-170.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  64. Lafarga, T., S. Villaró, G. Bobo, J. Simó and I. Aguiló‐Aguayo, 2019. Bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds in cooked pulses. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 54: 1816-1823.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  65. Bouayed, J., L. Hoffmann and T. Bohn, 2011. Total phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity following simulated gastro-intestinal digestion and dialysis of apple varieties: Bioaccessibility and potential uptake. Food Chem., 128: 14-21.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved