• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Dairy Science
  2. Vol 15 (3), 2020
  3. 142-151
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Dairy Science

Year: 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 142-151
DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2020.142.151
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows

Hanim A. Elsheikh Hanim  A. Elsheikh's LiveDNA, F.M. Abo-Donia F.M.  Abo-Donia's LiveDNA, T.H. El-Sawah, M.A. El-Shora, G.E. El-Emam and Amal M.A. Fayed

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: Using corn grains in silage leads to a relentless decrease in the availability of corn grains and high prices, causing high nutrition costs. This study aimed to use Date Pits (DP) as an available and cheap source of energy instead of Corn Grains (CG) to make silage during suffering from a shortage of quantities or high prices. Materials and Methods: Ground DP (3-5 mm) as a source of energy was added at 25 (DPS1), 50 (DPS2) and 75% (DPS3) Instead of corn grains in silage (CGS). Tested silage offered with concentrated feed mixture and rice straw in four diets T0, T1, T2 and T3, respectively. Twenty cows distributed for 4×4 Latin squares. Results: Using DP as an energy source in silage making did not adversely affect the color, odor and texture. Lactic acid, NH3-N, butyric acid and aerobic bacteria are within the desirable range. Components of silage not affected, while gas production and digestibility of Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) were reduced. The values of digestible protein and energy not significant (p>0.05) alterations with an added 25 and 50% DP, but decreased with added 75%. No significant difference found in actual milk, fat corrected milk and milk components among all groups. Feed conversion of experimental groups not affected. Blood biochemical constituents (total protein, albumin, globulin, urea and creatinine) not significantly affected. Conclusion: Utilize DP as an alternative to CG at silage making, up to 75%, maybe no effect of feed consumption, palatability, rumen fermentation, digestion factors or blood measurements.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Copyright: © 2020. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

How to cite this article

Hanim A. Elsheikh, F.M. Abo-Donia, T.H. El-Sawah, M.A. El-Shora, G.E. El-Emam and Amal M.A. Fayed, 2020. Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows. International Journal of Dairy Science, 15: 142-151.

DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2020.142.151

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijds.2020.142.151

INTRODUCTION


Egypt suffers from a gap equivalent to 60% of its needs of corn. This problem is also found in many subtropical countries that produce dates. In spite of Egypt is ranked in first place among the top five date-producing countries in the world (with a production of 1,465,030 tons in 2014) but despite the growth in the international demand, its export contribution to the international dates market is low1. At the same time, the large quantities of date pits available, it did not exploit the optimum exploitation in animal feeding, it can be used as a substitute for corn kernels in the silage. The Date Pits (DP) are mainly produced from dates production factories and date paste production units at the farm level1. DP contained high and variable quantities of fiber, with a high level of lignification (on DM basis): CF 16-51%, NDF 58-90%, ADF 41-46% and ADL 4-18%2 and contain appreciable amounts of K followed by P, Mg and Ca, with a little content of Na. The nutritive value of DP has been quite extensively studied due to its widespread availability in the countries where date production is important. Ground DP can be used up to 75% of the ruminant diets provided a good protein supplement. DP, as a major by-product remains after consumption of date flesh proved to be a valuable source of energy in animals and poultry rations3. The energy level and source in the diet affect animal performance and feed utilization4. The energy level supplementation in the animal diet depends on species, productive performance and climatic conditions5. The DP is traditionally used for ruminant animal feed as a source of energy6 and usually can be fed at any time of the year7. Dates can be used as a source of energy in partial substitution of the concentrates in the animal rations8. Since DP is rich in soluble sugars, vitamins and minerals and so has been used as a fermentation substrate of microbial activity for processing silage. The DP is containing (23% to 26.86%) total carbohydrates9, while the total carbohydrate content10 of DP is about up to 65.5%. However, good quality silage depends on moisture content, buffering capacity, sugar content and types of organisms11 DP has been used to supply energy source that can fast ferment into lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria. This study was aimed to appreciate the effects of partially replacing corn by crushing DP on silage quality and performance of lactating cows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


This study was conducted at El-Serw Experimental Station (from March 2018 to December 2018) belonging to the Animal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture. Egypt.

Silage preparation: The date pits (DP) were collected from the palm date's manufacture in the New Valley (El Wadi El Gedid Governorate). Hybrid corn-stalks (HCS) was assembled at the picked season of farmers by wholesalers with about 30% DM. Green corn stalks chopped by chopper machine to 2-5 cm length. Date pits were moistened with water for 72 hours, then ground to 3-5 mm. Silage material from HCS (30% DM) specifically included 30 kg per ton of ground corn as a source of energy for control silage (CGS). While the DP was added as an alternative to corn on metabolizable energy (ME) at 0, 25, 50 and 75% silage with corn grain (CGS), silage with 25% DP (DPS1), silage with 50% DP (DPS2) and silage with 75% DP (DPS3), respectively. The metabolizable energy content of the ingredient, silage and rations was calculated according to National Research Council12. The ground CG or DP distributed sequentially among the silage layers at a depth of 25 cm and sprayed with urea solution, with maintaining the optimum humidity of silage. Urea was added as a nitrogen source by 0.5% of chopped corn stalks for each kind of silage. Relative Feeds Value (RFV) was calculated according to Moore and Undersander13 and Fleig Points (FP) calculated from determined pH values and DM content of silage samples as the physical analysis according to the specified formula of Kamarloiy and Yansari14 as follows:

Fleig point = 220+(2×Dry Matter (%)-15)-40×pH

In vitro gas production determination: Rumen fluid inoculum was collected from three Ossimi rams (56± 2.0 kg body weight) which were fed ad-libitum a total mixed ration containing 1:1 concentrate feed mixture (CFM 14% CP) and rice straw to covering their nutrient requirements of maintenance. The well-mixed of rumen fluid and buffer at a ratio (1:4 vol/vol) as described by Goering and Van15 to reproduce a buffered ruminal solution. Nearly, 0.6 g of ground silage samples were weighed in 100 mL serum bottles of 60 mL buffered ruminal fluid under CO2 flushing. Three blanks contained only buffered ruminal fluid. The pressure of GP was recorded according to Theodorou et al.16 at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hrs of incubation using the GP technique (Hangzhou Runchen Electron Com., Hangzhou, China). After 72 hrs of incubation, all the content of each bottle filtered through four layers of a nylon bag (100 μm pore size) and the pH value of each bottle was immediately measured with a pH meter

(Hanna, model HI 8424). Then the residue was collected and oven-dried at 60°C to constant weight to find neutral detergent fiber degradability (dNDF). A 10 mL sample of each filtered fermentation fluid was collected for analysis of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA’s).

Metabolizable energy (ME, MJ/kg DM) determined according to the following equation of Menke17:

ME (MJ kg–1 DM) = 14.51 - (0.143 × ADF)

where, ME is Metabolisable energy, DM is Dry matter and ADF is acid detergent fiber (g kg–1 DM)

Feeding trial and management: Crossbreeding Friesian cows (n = 20) in the 2nd-3rd season of average weight 464±1.06 kg (mean, 134 days postpartum) were randomly distributed through five completed simultaneous 4×4 Latin Squares. Twelve Holstein cows were separated from the rest of the herd and housed in individual tie stalls. The cows were the diet consists of concentrated feed mixture (CFM), Rice Straw (RS) and tested silage, where, T0 (fed silage CGS), T1 (fed silage DPS1), T2 (fed silage DPS2) and T3 (fed silage DPS3), respectively. The experiment consisted of four periods lasting 17 days each (the first 10 days were for adaptation and the last 7 days were used for data collection). The concentrate feed mixture (CFM) was offered 2% based on live body weight (LBW) before the morning and the afternoon milking, while 4 kg/h/days of rice straw offered during feeding trail two times daily after milking directly. The silage was offered ad libtum daily from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, then refusals were collected to find the real feed intake of tested silage. Relative palatability was expressed as the ratio of the quantity of the actual silage consumed (ASC)/silage offered (SO). Animals were machines milked twice daily at 5.00 am and 5.00 pm and individual the morning and evening-milk yield was daily recorded. Every two weeks, composite milk samples were taken from composed evening and morning samples and were stored at -20°C for analysis. Milk samples were analyzed for the percentage of fat, protein, lactose; solid not fat (SNF), Total Solids (TS) and ash by milk SCAN 133 BN Foss Electric, Denmark. However, Fat corrected milk (4% FCM) was calculated by using the following equation: 4% FCM = 0.4× actual milk yield in kg/day+15×milk fat in kg/day. Also, Relative Feeds Value (RFV) is calculated by Rohweder et al.18 using the following equations as follows:

Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows

where: Dry matter intake (DMI, body weight (%)) = 120/(NDF, DM (%)) and Digestible dry matter (DDM, %) = 88.9-(0.779×ADF, DM (%)).

Digestibility trials: Fecal samples were collected at the end period (6 am and 6 pm). Composite feeds and fecal samples were analyzed according to AOAC.19. The nutrients digestibility was estimated using acid insoluble ash (AIA) method described by Keulen and Young20.

Laboratory analysis: At the end of the ensiling period (60 days), color and odor were examined and samples were taken from each silage kind for chemical analysis. Silage samples were extracted using twenty grams homogenized the wet sample with 100 mL distilled water for 10 min in the blender21. The homogenous were filtered through double layers of cheesecloth and then the filtrate was used to determine silage pH directly by using HANNA pH-meter (model HI 8424). Ammonia-N (NH3-N) concentration was estimated according to the descriptions of Weatherburn22 and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA’s) fractions were analyzed according to Erwin et al.23. The lactic acid concentration was determined by methods of Analytical Chemistry of Foods24. Ground samples of feeds or residuals and feces were subjected for proximate analysis procedure AOAC.19. Neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber procedures were performed as described by Van Soest et al.25. The neutral detergent fiber was assayed with the addition of a heat-stable amylase, but without sodium sulfite. Water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) concentration was measured colorimetrically as a method by DuBois et al.26.

Serum Total Protein (TP), albumin (Alb), urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were determined by using commercial kits, (Bio Merieux 69280 Marcy-1, Etoile/France). Serum globulin (Glb) was obtained by difference.

Statistical analysis: All statistical analyses were performed using PROC GLM of SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4). Animals were allocated to four 4×4 Latin square27, containing five animals, four experimental periods and four treatments. Each animal within a period was the experimental unit. The statistical model is as follows:

yijkl = μ + αi + βj + c(α)ki + tl + εijkl,

where, yijkl represents the observation of cow k in square i at period j subjected to treatment l, αi represents the fixed effect of square i (i = 1, 2, 3,4), βj represents the fixed effect of period j (j = 1, 2, 3, 4); c(α)ki represents the fixed effect of cow k within square i and εijkl represents the random error.

The results for intake, feed efficiency, variation in body weight, milk production, milk composition and digestibility were subjected to analysis of variance and test of means, with Tukey's test applied at 0.05 probability for comparison of the means. All statistical procedures were carried out using SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4).

RESULTS


Chemical compositions of silage and diets: Chemical compositions of the experimental silages, corn grains (CG) and date pits (DP) are presented in Table 1. Corn grains (CG) composed 89.68% DM, 9.82% CP, 4.21% EE, 1.59% Ash, 10.12% NDF and 3.48% ADF. In opposite, DP contained 91.76% DM, 5.89% CP, 7.69% EE, 1.47% Ash, 63.65% NDF and 44.56% ADF. Also, DP had high levels of total phenolic. Added DP as an alternative energy source to CG at different levels during making corn silage showed no differences in terms of DM content which fall in the normal corn silage DM range. Also, the content of CP and ash in DPS1, DPS2 and DPS3, respectively were at the same level compared to CGS.

Table 1:Composition of the tested silages and ingredients (% on DM basis)
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
CG: Corn grains, DP: Date pits, CGS: Corn silage with CG, DPS1: Corn silage with DP(25%), DPS2: Corn silage with DP(50%) and DPS3: Corn silage with DP (75%), TPC: Total phenolic content (g GAE/100g DW), ME: Metabolizable energy and RFV: Relative feed value

Table 2: Fermentation characteristics of corn silage stored for 60 days
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
CGS: Corn silage with CG, DPS1: Corn silage with DP(25%), DPS2: Corn silage with DP (50%) and DPS3: Corn silage with DP (75%), La: Lactic acid, Ac: Acetic acid, Bu: Butyric acid and WSC: water-soluble carbohydrate

The contents of EE, NDF and ADF were slightly increased with the different levels of DP. The RFV value of tested silages ranged from 113.92 to 103.02, where reduced slightly when the ratio of DP increased in silages. The best Fleig points value that indicates good quality silage show with adding corn grains compared to adding DP.

The values of the different fermentation characteristics of tested silage are shown in Table 2. Tested silages were similar in their properties having olive green color, pleasant alcoholic odor, firm texture. The tested silage exhibit pleasant alcoholic aroma stated pleasant smell is accepted for good or well-made silage. The fermented silage increased pH values slightly as DP when substituted of CG in the silage making were ranged between 4.19 (CGS): 4.24 (DPS3) which indeed showed effective preservation. The values of Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), lactate, propionate proportion and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) reduced unimportant with the increasing substituting level of DP in silage. The different parameter's value of all tested silage was within the desirable range of optimal. Lactic acid bacteria populations slightly decrease to DPS3 (6.81 log CFU/g fresh matter) compared to S1 (6.89 log CFU/g fresh matter) and this has led to a decrease in the amount of lactic acid produced in DPS3 compared to CGS.

Proximate analysis of the experimental diets, concentrate feed mixtures (CFM) and rice straw (RC) (% on DM basis) is shown in Table 3.

Table 3:
Proximate analysis of the experimental diets (% on DM basis)
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
a,b,cWithin a raw, means bearing different superscript are statistically different, p<0.05

The percent of DM, OM, CP, EE, ash and NFE of the tested diets were relatively close among all the dietary treatments. While the NDF and ADF concentrations of the control diet (T0) were the lowest of all experimental diets that contain DP (T1, T2 and T3). An opposite trend was observed for Non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) values which were related to higher NDF and ADF contents of the DP than that of CG.

Effect of tested silage on gas production and degradability: The data of in vitro fermentation kinetics are shown in Table 4. The lowest values of the gas potential extent of gas production (50.75 ml/g DM) were observed with DPS3, while the highest value was shown with CGS (57.19 ml/g DM). No significant (p>0.05) difference in gas production rate (h–1) was found among all tested silage kinds. The ME values of silage containing DP significantly (p<0.05) decreased with increasing DP level in the silage, so this finding due to reducing fermentation and fiber degradability of silage. In-vitro gas production rates concerning tested silage indicate a decrease in the release of GP with a higher level of addition of DP in silage as a source of energy instead of corn.

Effect of experimental diets on cow’s nutrient digestibility: The total apparent digestibility of DM, CP and EE as shown in Table 5 had the same trend (p>0.05) for the control treatment (T0) compared with those treatments incorporated silage with DP. However, total tract apparent digestibility of OM, NDF and ADF nutrients decreased (p<0.05) significantly with the inclusion of the DP in the diet T3 compared to the control (T0). There were no significant (p>0.05) differences between all treatments of DCP (%) since there was a significant (p<0.05) decrease in the values of TDN (%) and calculated metabolizable energy (Mcal/Kg DM) with diet T3, compared to control diet T0.

Effect of experimental diets on DMI and animal performance: The results of dry matter intake (DMI), feed conversion, milk production and milk composition are presented in Table 6.

Table 4:Gas production and degradability of different tested silages
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
CGS: Corn silage with CG, DPS1: Corn silage with DP(25%), DPS2: Corn silage with DP(50%) and DPS3: Corn silage with DP (75%), GP: Gas production (ml/g DM), C: rate of gas production (hr), dNDF: NDF degradability (%) and ME: Metabolizable energy (Mj/kg), a,b,c Within a column, means bearing different superscript are statistically different, p<0.05

Table 5:
Nutrients digestibility coefficients and nutritive values of experimental rations
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
a,b,c Within a raw, means bearing different superscript are statistically different, p<0.05, TDN: Total digestible nutrients, NDF: Neutral detergent fiber and ADF: Acid detergent fiber

Table 6:
Feed intake, feed conversion, milk production and composition of dairy cows fed the experimental rations
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
a,b,c Within a raw, means bearing different superscript are statistically different, p<0.05, MSNF: Milk solids-not-fat TS: Total solid, TDN: Total digestible nutrients and FCM: Fat corrected milk

There was no significant (p>0.05) alter of consumed silage or total DMI for all experimental groups. Residual silage of the control group was better than of all groups fed silage incorporated with DP. However, relative palatability silages intake of DPS2 and DPS3 was significantly (p<0.05) higher than of the CGS silage (T0). Cows displayed no significant difference (p>0.05) in terms of actual milk and fat corrected milk among all groups which indicated the all experimental diets covered both the maintenance and production requirements of cows. Concerning the all milk components of cows except ash content, no significant (p>0.05) differences were observed among experimental groups. Ash content was significantly (p<0.5) higher for the T0 group (1.46%) compared to the T3 group (1.28%). No significant (p>0.05) differences appeared between the tested groups with regard to the feed conversion factors, whether the consumer was from dry matter, digested compounds, or the nitrogen consumer per kg of fat corrected milk.

Effect of experimental diets on blood biochemical parameters: Blood biochemical parameters are shown in Table 7. Experimental diets did not significantly (p>0.05) affect the different blood biochemical constituents represented by the total protein, albumin, globulin, urea and creatinine concentrations in the cow serum.

Table 7:
Blood serum biochemical parameters in lactating cows
Image for - Using an Unconventional Energy Source to Make Silages and their Impact on Silage Quality and Performance of Lactating Cows
AST: Aspartate aminotransferase and ALT: Alanine aminotransferase

Concerning liver enzymes including both ALT and AST concentrations, no significant (p>0.05) differences were observed among dietary treatments.

DISCUSSION


There was no eminent alteration in the quality or chemical composition of produced silage when replacing corn grains with the date pits. The components of silage were very comparable as well in energy content and relative feed value, all changes were slight. Good silage usually preserves the original color of the pasture or any forages11. The olive green color obtained in the present study was close to the original color of the grass which was an indication of good quality silage28. The pleasant alcoholic aroma in tested silage considered an indication of well-made silage29. Values of pH in the tested silage were in the optimal range and closer observed by Binuomote et al.30 who concluded that high-quality silages to have pH values 3.5-4.5. The lowered values of NH3-N and lactic acid may be influenced by the high level of total phenolic content as antibacterial activity in DP (4.12 g gallic acid equivalents GAE /100 g DW) compared to that in CG (2.71 g GAE/100 g DW). According to many studies, low content of NH3-N in silage may be due to two main reasons, the first could be due to the ability of phenolic content to be an insoluble complex with proteins31-33 which lead to the inhibition of bacterial proteolytic activities with silage34 and thus protect the protein from degradation in silage35,36. The second reason is a decrease in NH3-N level with a shrinkage of the protein contents of DP (5.89% on DM) compared to CG (9.82% on DM) as shown in Table 2.

The chemical analysis of CG and DP used in silage making corresponded to earlier studies of Benmeddour et al.36 they found that CG was higher contenting of CP compared to DP, while DP was containing higher fiber than that in CG. Thus, it could be used as feed additives or functional feeds36 DM content of all tested silage was consistent with what stated in the study by Kung and Shaver37, who reported that the dry matter range between 30 to 35%. The replacement CG led to an increase in the content of EE, NDF and ADF in silage, which may be due to higher it in DP. The reducing values of RFV might be due to the high NDF and ADF contents in DP compared to corn grains and high pH values (4.24) of DPS3 the 60th day where Dunham38 concluded that, Flieg point of the silage was acceptable (super or better class) at 60 days of the ensiling period. Fleig points value for silages in the present study are closer to those observed by Saricicek et al.28 with corn silage (103.02) on the 90th day.

In spite of the slight rise of NDF and ADF content in silage with date pits, the consumer and the palatability did not change. The increased content of NDF and ADF in produced silage is due to the increased level of dates, especially with the high replacement ratio of 50 and 75%. As a result of the quiet palatability of silage containing date pits, there has been no change in the total feed intake of experimental animals. Fiber digestibility and forage fragility are critical factors that should be considered in forage evaluation and diet formulation for ruminants11. Traditionally, nutritionists have focused primarily on fiber digestibility parameters measures and kinetics of ruminal Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) degradations39. However, recent studies have suggested including indigestible fiber measures as a necessary type of fiber that had unique ability to influence the turnover rate of ruminal fiber pools and eventually set the rate and final extent of rumen fiber digestion37. Despite higher content of the NDF and ADF with an increased level of DP in silage, except that it is within the recommended defining an upper limit for dietary NDF in the high production of dairy cows30.

When feedstuffs are incubated in vitro gas is produced mainly from the fermentation of carbohydrates40 with a small contribution to the fermentation of protein or fat41. Our results suggest that DP would be also highly fermentable feedstuffs in the silage that could represent a substantial supply of energy to the microorganism. The same trends of lower values of asymptotic gas production were observed with studies of Boufennara et al.42 who observed that the in vitro fermentation kinetics estimated from the gas production curves were significantly lower values. A possible explanation for higher gas volumes from NDF may stay in the efficiency with which fermentable material is allowed into microbial cells. There is a possible contrary relationship between gas production (i.e. short-chain fatty acid production) and LAB cell yield when both were related to a given unit of substrate truly fermented40,41. Correspondingly less microbial yield and higher SCFA assembly from NDF would, therefore, mean higher gas volumes from NDF.

Regarding data of total apparent digestibility, might be the reason for these results can be simply attributed to the fact that as cell wall increases, digestibility and energy content decrease43. As a result of the inadequacy of change in the feed intake, this was reversed on the digestibility coefficient of the experimental diets. These results were comparable to digestibility values by Kung and Shaver37, Ferraretto and Shaver44, Al-Suwaiegh45 and Suliman and Mustafa46 they reported that inclusion levels from 5 to 28% of palm kernel meal in the diet of lactating dairy cows did not affect digestibility coefficient of the experimental diets. Similar results were reported by Al-Shanti47 who observed no effect of CP digestibility with the level of 30% DP of the goat's rations. Similar DMI among all tested groups may be attributed to the close contents of dietary NDF (51.72 : 55.26%), ADF (32.81 : 35.56%) and acetic acid (2.1-2.19 g/100 g DM) of silage. Replacing either corn or barley with crushed DP at 50, 75 and 100% on DM basis, no change was observed in average daily feed intake46. In the same context, DMI has much increased with the increase in the percentage of ground DP up to 15.57% in lamb diets47. Incidentally, milk yield and milk composition study by Sharifi et al.48 who shows no effect on milk yield and milk composition of Saanen dairy goats with different levels of DP (0, 6, 12 and 18%) of the diet (on DM basis). There is no significant difference in the feed conversion ratio of experimental groups that were agreed with Al-Shanti47 who found the DP inclusion up to 20% of the CG in lamb diets had no adverse effect on the nutritive value of feed intake which indicated cows on the different diets fed similar diets of its TDN content and so produced a similar feed conversion ratio.

The inadequacy of change in the feed intake, as well as the digestibility coefficient, was reversed on the blood constituents as no significant modifications appeared between the tested groups. The values of blood biochemical constituents were within the normal ranges reported by Sharifi et al.48 and Kaneko et al.49 they stated that replacing yellow corn by date seed didn't affect blood parameters. This may be explained that, the increased total phenols levels of DP which was associated without alteration of the protein utilization.

These findings are in good agreement with those obtained by Azzaz et al.50 who reported no significant (p>0.05) effect of feeding sheep on DP at the level of 50% replacing concentrate feed mixture of blood total protein, albumin, globulin, urea-N and creatinine. The values observed in this study might explain that DP has adequate amounts of protein for maintenance and production, especially since serum urea level is a good display of malnutrition51. These data concluded that, the use of date pits as an energy source was reasonably positive and the results obtained from the above indicate the possibility of using it as an alternative to corn grains. The importance of date pits is because it contains an acceptable percentage of energy in addition to the possibility of storing it for long periods and therefore it can be used in critical periods. In addition to that, the percentage of substitution can reach 75% of corn grains without any effect on the quality of silage or the consumer of food, as well as the digestibility factors or the production of milk and its ingredients.

CONCLUSION


In conclusion, the results of this study indicate the possibility of using dates pits as an alternative to corn, up to 75%, without any adverse impact on feed consumption, palatability, rumen fermentation, digestion factors or blood measurements.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


This study discovers that uses of dates as one of the unconventional sources rich in energy and not well exploited will have can be beneficial for impact on the costs of manufacturing silage. On the other hand, it is possible to use date pits to address the problems caused by the shortage of corn grains or their high prices during the critical periods, especially in countries located in the subtropical region, where it is considered one of the proposed solutions in this regard. The novel discoveries of many energy sources will add multiple options in front of livestock owners to choose the most appropriate and least expensive, especially in many regions of the world that have a problem in the availability of corn grain, high prices, or the impact of climate changes on productivity.

REFERENCES


  1. Barreveld, W.H., 1993. Date Palm Products. FAO, Rome.

  2. Boudechiche, L., A. Araba, A. Tahar, and R. Ouzrout, 2009. Study of chemical composition of date stones for use in animal feed. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., 21: 221-229.
    Direct Link

  3. Hossain, M.Z., M.I. Waly, V. Singh, V. Sequeira and M.S. Rahman, 2014. Chemical composition of date-pits and its potential for developing value-added product-a review. Polish J. Food Nutr. Sci., 64: 215-226.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Omer, H.A.A., S.S. Abdel-Magid, S.M. Ahmed, M.I. Mohamed and I.M. Awadalla, 2010. Response to partial replacement of yellow corn with potato processing waste as non-traditional source of energy on the productive performance of Ossimi lambs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 1195-1202.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Rekik, M., N. Lassoued, H.B. Salem and M. Mahouachi, 2008. Effects of incorporating wasted dates in the diet on reproductive traits and digestion of prolific D'Man ewes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 147: 193-205.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Banat, F., S. Al-Asheh and L. Al-Makhadmeh, 2003. Evaluation of the use of raw and activated date pits as potential adsorbents for dye containing waters. Process Biochem., 39: 193-202.
    CrossRef

  7. Genin, D., A. Kadri, T. Khorchani, K. Sakkal, F. Belgacem and M. Hamadi, 2004. Valorisation of Date-Palm By-Products (DPBP) for Livestock Feeding in Southern Tunisia. I-Potentialities and Traditional Utilisation. In: Nutrition and Feeding Strategies of Sheep and Goats Under Harsh Climates, Ben Salem, H., A. Nefzaoui and P. Morand-Fehr (Eds.). CIHEAM, Zaragoza, Spain, pp: 227-232
    Direct Link

  8. Mebirouk-Boudechiche, L., and A. Araba, 2011. Effect of addition of dates rubbish grazing on animal performance of Berber ewes and their lambs. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 162: 111-117.
    Direct Link

  9. Al-Alawi, R.A., J.H. Al-Mashiqri, J.S. Al-Nadabi, B.I. Al-Shihi and Y. Baqi, 2017. Date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Natural products and therapeutic options. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Baliga, M.S., B.R.V. Baliga, S.M. Kandathilc, H.P. Bhatd and P.K. Vayalil, 2011. A review of the chemistry and pharmacology of the date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Food Res. Int., 44: 1812-1822.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Abo-Donia, F.M., N.A.M. Soliman and U.A. El-Zalaki, 2009. Nutritional and economical feasibility of using reeds (Arundo Domax, L) silage compared to corn (Zea mays L) silage as sheep feed. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 12: 243-256.
    Direct Link

  12. NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Pages: 405.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Moore, J.E. and D.J. Undersander, 2002. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, (AFRNS`02), Alltech, Inc., pp: 16-32.

  14. Kamarloiy, M. and A.T. Yansari, 2008. Effect of microbial inoculants on the nutritive value of corn silage for beef cattle. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 11: 1137-1141.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  15. Goering, H.K., and P.J. Van Soest, 1970. Forage fiber analyses: apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications (No. 379). Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.

  16. Theodorou, M.K., B.A. Williams, M.S. Dhanoa, A.B. McAllan and J. France, 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 48: 185-197.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Menke, K.H. and H. Steingass, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28: 7-55.
    Direct Link

  18. Rohweder, D.A., R.F. Barnes and N. Jorgensen, 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J. Anim. Sci., 47: 747-759.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. AOAC, 2012. Official methods of analysis, Association of official analytical chemist. 19th Edn., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Washington D.C., USA.

  20. Van Keulen, J. and B.A. Young, 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 282-287.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Waldo, D.R. and L.H. Schultz, 1956. Lactic acid production in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci., 39: 1453-1460.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Weatherburn, M.W., 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal. Chem., 39: 971-974.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Erwin, E.S., G.J. Marco and E.M. Emery, 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J. Dairy Sci., 44: 1768-1771.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. James, C.S., 1995. Analytical Chemistry of Foods. Blackie Academic and Professional, New York.

  25. van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  26. DuBois, A.B., S.Y. Botelho, G.N. Bedell, R. Marshall, and J.H. Comroe, 1956. A rapid plethysmographic method for measuring thoracic gas volume: a comparison with a nitrogen washout method for measuring functional residual capacity in normal subjects. J. Clin. Invest., 35: 322-326.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. Kuehl, R.O., 2000. Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. 2nd Edn., Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA., ISBN: 978-0534188047.

  28. Saricicek, B.Z., B. Yoldirimi, Z. Kocabasi, and E.O. Demiri, 2016. The effects of storage time on nutrient composition and silage quality parameters of corn silage made in plastic mini silo in laboratory conditions. Igdir Univ. J. Inst. Sci. Technol., 6: 177-183.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Balwinder, K., B. Navjot, V. Harish, K. Anil, and S. Rajbir, 2019. Nutritious feed for farm animals during lean period: silage and hay-a review. Forage Res., 45: 10-22.
    Direct Link

  30. Binuomote R.T., F.O. Bamigboye, A.J. Amuda and G.M. Ayebogan, 2019. Silage quality and preference of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) with varying levels of poultry dropping and cassava peel by west african dwarf goats. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 6: 537-548.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Gordon, C.H., J.C. Derbyshire, H.G. Wiseman, E.A. Kane and C.G. Melin, 1961. Preservation and feeding value of alfalfa stored as hay, haylage, and direct-cut silage. J. Dairy Sci., 44: 1299-1311.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Huhtanen, P., H. Khalil, J.I. Nousiainen, M. Rinne, S. Jaakkola, T. Heikkila and J. Nouisiainen, 2002. Prediction on the relative intake potential of grass silage by dairy cows. Livestock Prod. Sci., 73: 111-130.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Al-Farsi, M., C. Alasalvar, M. Al-Abid, K. Al-Shoaily, M. Al-Amry and F. Al-Rawahy, 2007. Compositional and functional characteristics of dates, syrups and their by-products. Food Chem., 104: 943-947.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Makkar, H.P.S., B. Singh and S.S. Negi, 1990. Tannin levels and their degree of polymerisation and specific activity in some agro-industrial by-products. Biol. Wastes, 31: 137-144.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Man, N.V. and H. Wiktorsson, 2001. Cassava tops ensiled with or without molasses as additive effects on quality, feed intake and digestibility by Heifer. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 4: 624-630.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. Benmeddour, Z., E. Mehinagic, D. Le Meurlay and H. Louaileche, 2013. Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacities of ten Algerian date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars: A comparative study. J. Funct. Foods, 5: 346-354.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Kung, L., and Shaver, R., 2001. Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports. Focus on Forage- Vol 3: No. 13. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents.

  38. Dunham, J.R., 1998. Relative feed value measures forage quality. Forage Facts # 41, KState AES and CES, pp 3.

  39. Balwinder, K., B. Navjot, V. Harish, K. Anil, and S. Rajbir, 2019. Nutritious feed for farm animals during lean period: silage and hay-a review. Forage Res., 45: 10-22.
    Direct Link

  40. Blummel, M. and E.R. Orskov, 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 40: 109-119.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Nkosi, B.D., P.V. Vadlani, K. Brijwani, A. Nanjunda and R. Meeske, 2012. Effects of bacterial inoculants and an enzyme on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of ensiled whole-crop sweet sorghum. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 232-240.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  42. Boufennara, S., L. Bouazza, A. De Vega, M. Fondevila, Z. Amanzougarene, and S. Lopez, 2016. In vitro assessment of nutritive value of date palm by-products as feed for ruminants. Emir. J. Food Agric., 28: 695-703.
    CrossRef

  43. Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 1st Edn., Cornell University Press, USA.

  44. Ferraretto, L.F. and R.D. Shaver, 2015. Effects of whole-plant corn silage hybrid type on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and lactation performance by dairy cows through a meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 2662-2675.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  45. Al-Suwaiegh, S.B., 2015. Effect of substitution of date pits in concentrate feed on growth performance and nutrients digestibility of ardi goats. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 9: 110-118.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  46. Suliman, A.I.A. and S.M.S. Mustafa, 2014. Effects of ground date seeds as a partial replcer of ground maize on nitrogen metabolism and growth performance of lambs. Egypt. J. Sheep Goat Sci., 9: 23-31.
    Direct Link

  47. Al-Shanti, H.A., A.M. Kholif, K.J. Al-Shakhrit, M.F. Al-Banna and I.E. Abu Showayb, 2013. Use of crushed date seeds in feeding growing Assaf lambs. Egypt. J. Sheep Goat Sci., 8: 65-73.
    Direct Link

  48. Sharifi, M., M. Bashtani, A. A. Naserian and H. Farhangfar, 2017. The Effect of increasing levels of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) seed on the performance, ruminal fermentation, antioxidant status and milk fatty acid profile of Saanen dairy goats. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 101: e332-e341.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  49. Kaneko, J.J., J.W. Harvey and M.L. Bruss, 2008. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 6th Edn., Academic Press, New York, pp: 881-888.

  50. Azzaz, H.H., E.S.A. Farahat and H.M. Ebeid, 2017. Effect of partial replacement of corn grains by date seeds on rahmani ram’s nutrients digestibility and Nubian goat’s milk production. Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12: 266-274.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  51. Abo-Donia, F., G. El-Emam, M. El-Shora, A. Fayed, H. Elsheikh and T. El-Sawah, 2019. Utilization of discarded dates as a source of energy in silage fermentation and the effect of silage produced on the performance of dairy cows. J. Anim. Poult. Prod., 10: 109-114.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Related Articles

Effect of Substitution of Date Pits in Concentrate Feed on Growth Performance and Nutrients Digestibility of Ardi Goats
Effect of Partial Replacement of Corn Grains by Date Seeds on Rahmani Ram’s Nutrients Digestibility and Nubian Goat’s Milk Production
Effect of Microbial Inoculants on the Nutritive Value of Corn Silage for Beef Cattle

Comments


Fawzy Abo-Donia Reply
13 August, 2020

Best wishes to all

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved