Climate variability is a characteristic feature of the tropics, particularly
West Africa where the summer monsoon starts from May/June and ends mostly in
October (Sivakumar, 1988), thus, producing an unpredictably
variable length of the growing season. Climate change is a threat to crop productivity
in the most vulnerable regions of the world, especially the tropics and particularly
the semi-arid regions where higher temperatures and increases in rainfall variability
could have substantially negative impacts (Parry et al.,
2004). The 21st century is projected to experience a rise of 1.8-4.0°C
in surface air temperature with very likely occurrence of unpredictable extreme
events such as drought and floods (IPCC, 2007).
Yield stability across different environments is an important consideration
in crop breeding programs that target areas with variable climatic patterns
(Feizias et al., 2010). For quantitative traits
such as yield, for which the relative performances of cultivars often change
from one environment to another, extensive testing is required for identifying
genotypes with minimal interaction with environments, or that possess greatest
yield stability (Bahrami et al., 2008). Accessions
among any set of genetic materials being tested that would be adapted to a wide
range of growing conditions can be considered as ideal for areas with variable
climates. These accessions should produce above average grain yields and have
below average variances across environments to be considered stable. Stability
can either by static (biological) or dynamic (agronomic) with the most desirable
form being dependent on the trait under consideration. Static stability is required
when a constant performance (zero variance) of the trait across variable environments
is desired (e.g. disease tolerance) whiles dynamic stability is required when
predictable responses to variable environments are desirable, examples being
yield components and the quantity and quality of yield (Becker,
1981). Indices for determining both types of stability of grain yield exist.
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) plays an important role as a major
staple crop of the arid and semi-arid tropics. Sorghum is mainly produced by
small holder farmers under rain-fed conditions that have been predicted to be
adversely affected by climate change (Folliard et al.,
2004; IPCC, 2007). This will have negative impacts
on food security and the livelihoods of people in the arid and semi-arid tropics.
The characteristics and basis of an ideal sorghum genotype in such ecologies
have been stated by several authors (AGRHYMET, 1992;
Sultan et al., 2005; Vaksmann
et al., 1996; Traore et al., 2007;
Andrew et al., 2000). One trait that has so far
been shown to facilitate adaptation of sorghum to variable lengths of the growing
season in the arid and semi-arid tropics is photoperiod sensitivity (Craufurd
et al., 1999; Craufurd and Qi, 2001; Kouressy
et al., 2008). This trait has therefore been given attention in the
development of improved and higher yielding sorghum cultivars with various degrees
of adaptation to different climatic patterns in the arid and semi-arid tropics
(Kouressy et al., 2008; Clerget
et al., 2004).
For the specific problem of coping with climate change, breeders have to identify
and/or develop cultivars with adequate plasticity for adaptation to ecologies
with high spatio-temporal variability of rainfall. This could be done by deploying
the ideotype concept, proposed by Donald (1968)
as a biological model. The cultivars currently adapted and widely cultivated
in the arid and semi-arid tropics present a gene pool from which appropriate
accessions and/or traits for developing new cultivars adapted to variable climates
(based on well defined ideotype concepts) can be extracted. However, information
on the yield potential and stability of yield for these widely cultivated photoperiod
sensitive sorghum accessions, across diverse environments, as well as potential
contributions of various traits to these qualities is scanty or nonexistent.
Generally, the study sought to determine if the current gene pool of photoperiod
sensitive sorghum in the tropics could be resorted to for developing cultivars
for coping with changed and variable climate. Specifically, we sought to determine
the attainable yield performance as well as yield stability of an assortment
of sorghum genotypes across diverse climate scenarios in the arid and semi-arid
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Locations and environments: The field studies were conducted under rainfed
conditions at three sites along a latitudinal gradient and representative of
different tropical agro-ecological zones. These were the agronomic research
stations of the Institute dEconomie Rurale (IER) at Cinzana (13°15'N;
5°52'W; 312 masl; Sahel), Sotuba (12°17'N; 7°57'W; 364 masl; Sudan
Savannah) and Farako (11°21'N; 5°41'W; 441 mas1; Guinea Savannah) all
in Mali. Cinzana, Sotuba and Farako have mean annual rainfall of 600, 900 and
1000 mm, respectively. The sites have a hot, tropical climate with a mean, annual,
maximal (minimal) daily temperature of 36.0°C (21.7°C) at Cinzana, 34.4°C
(21.9°C) at Sotuba and 33.7°C (21.0°C) at Farako.
||Description, code, environment mean yield (Emean
(g m-2) value, Rank, total rainfall (mm), mean maximum (Tmax;
°C) and minimum (Tmin; °C) temperature, IPCA1 Scores
and the Best 4 AMMI Genotypic Selections per Environment of different climate
scenarios used for a study at Mali in 2008 and 2009
|a: RS: Regular Sown, a: RS+1: One month delay,
c: RS+2: Two month delay; d: Critical photoperiod, e: number of days after
sowing; f: Total yield loss due to severe midge infestation; g: Total yield
loss due to terminal drought; h: see plant materials section under materials
and methods for details on genotypes
Soil types were Sandy Loam for Farako, Loamy Sand for Sotuba and Silty Clay
Climate scenarios were created using the different sites and staggered monthly dates of Sowing (S) within sites. Three monthly sowing per site were used for this study. The first date of sowing at each site represents the earliest ideal situation for sowing and was taken as the Regular date of Sowing (RS). The majority of farmers in the study regions will plant at this date. Subsequent dates of sowing were spaced by one month from the previous and designated as one month delayed (RS+1) and two-month delayed (RS+2). Actual dates of sowing at Farako and Sotuba were June (RS), July (RS+1) and August (RS+2) whiles those at Cinzana were July (RS), August (RS+1) and September (RS+2) in both years. Table 1 presents detailed characteristics of the environments used in the study.
Plant materials: Ten well characterized grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) accessions, from an assortment of races and with differences in traits such as photoperiod sensitivity, height and adaptation to agro-ecology were tested in each environment (i.e., year, site and date of sowing combination). These accessions are representative of the diversity of varieties cultivated in the arid and semi-arid tropics. 97-SB-150 (97 S) is a medium cycled (110-120 days), tall and short-day improved guinea race adapted to areas with 800-1000 mm isohyets; Boiguel (BOI) is a durra type early maturing (100 days) landrace that is adapted to the Sahelian agro-ecology and collected from Bema (15°4N; 9°19W; 316 m asl) in Mali; CSM 388 (CS3) is an intermediate maturing (120 days), tall and photoperiod sensitive guinea landrace that is adapted to the Sudan Savannah agro-ecology; CSM 63E (CS6) is an improved early maturing (100 days) and tall guinea landrace, with weak sensitivity to photoperiod, adapted to the Sahelien agro-ecology; Grinkan (GRI) is an improved short-day and dwarf guinea-caudatum Open Pollinated Variety (OPV) with intermediate maturity supplied by the Institut d'Economie Rurale (IER); IRAT 204 (IRA) is an improved early maturing (90 days), dwarf and day-neutral caudatum variety developed by CIRAD; Lakahieri (LAK) is a durra type medium duration (110 days) landrace that is adapted to the Sahelian agro-ecology and collected from Bema; Lata-3 (LAT) is short-day variety from the guinea race with intermediate height and is adapted to zones with 700-900 isohyets. Dancouma (DAN) is a tall photosensitive and late maturing (140 days) guinea landrace native to the Guinea Savannah agro-ecology;. Wassa (WAS) is a medium maturing (105 days), tall and short-day variety adapted to areas with 600-800 mm isohyets.
Experimental procedures and data analysis: The study involved the use of a split plot arrangement in a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications, with date of sowing as main plot factor and sorghum accessions as subplot factor at each site for 2 years (2008 and 2009). Each experimental plot was 9 m wide (12 ridges spaced 0.75 m apart) and 4 m long and was split into two sub-units of 7 ridges (for regular destructive sampling) and 5 ridges (for yield determination). Hills were spaced 0.25 apart and the seedlings from the 5-10 seeds sown per hill were thinned to 1 plant within 10-14 days after sowing, resulting in a density of 53,333 plants ha-1.
Weed control was done manually with hoes when necessary to minimize competition for resources. Chemical fertilizers were applied at a rate of 30 kg each of N, P and K ha-1 using di-ammonium phosphate and muriate of potash at sowing and top dressing with 46 kg N ha-1 using urea at 6-8 weeks after sowing to minimize the effect of soil fertility variation. Appropriate pesticides were applied to minimize the effects of biotic stresses. Grain yield of the accessions was evaluated on each and all the plots by sampling from an area of 7.9 m2, comprising of 3 rows of 3.5 m long spaced 0.75 m apart. This was adjusted to 14% moisture (weight basis) and converted to yield (in g) per m2 using an appropriate factor.
Data analyses: Hypotheses relating to the effects of treatments on mean
grain yield were tested using analysis of variance. A four-way interaction model
was applied with year as random effect and location, date of sowing and genotype
as fixed effects. This model can be stated as:
where, Xijkl = value of treatment in ith Year, jth Location, kth Sowing and lth Genotype; μ = general mean; Yi = ith Year; Lj = jth Location; Sk = kth Sowing; Gl = lth Genotype; (YL)ij.... = interactions between Year, Location, Sowing and Genotype etc.; eijkl = error of Xijkl.
A total of 120 experimental units (40 at each site and 60 for each year) of
delayed sowing, covering 10 cultivars at 2 dates of sowing (RS+1 and RS+2) at
each of the 3 locations over the 2 years were obtained in the study. Yield penalty
due to delayed sowing was estimated using the yield of RS as a reference or
bench mark for each site in each year. This was done by expressing the difference
between grain yield for RS and that for each of the delayed dates of sowing
as a percentage of grain yields for RS at each location in each year.
Assessment of yield stability: Yield stability was assessed using both
static and dynamic indices. Seven different ability indices were calculated:
Regression coefficient (RC; Finlay and Wilkinson, 1963);
Superiority index (SUP; Lin and Binns, 1988); Mean Rank
(MR; Nassar and Huhn, 1987); Mean Absolute Difference
(MAD; Nassar and Huhn, 1987); Rank Variance (VAR; Nassar
and Huhn, 1987); First Interaction Principal Component axes of the AMMI
analysis (IPCA1; Purchase, 1997); AMMI Stability Value
(ASV; Purchase et al., 2000). Spearmans
rank correlation was used to establish interrelations both between grain yield
and the indices, as well as among the indices. This was done for genotypes across
all environments as well as for environments over all genotypes. All computations
were done using standard procedures of GENSTAT Twelfth Edition (22.214.171.12478)
software (VSN International Ltd., 2009).
Climate: Apart from the regular sowing for both years at the Guinea
Savannah agro-ecology, where the seedlings grew under increasing photoperiod
for 2 weeks, all other environments presented different ranges of decreasing
photoperiod conditions. The trends of temperature and rainfall for the long-term
(55 years) and the 2008 and 2009 seasons are presented in Fig.
||Trends of temperature and rainfall for the long-term (55 years)
and the growing seasons of 2008 and 2009; (a) Gvinea savannah (b) sudan
savannah and (c) Sahel
||General and Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions
(AMMI) Analysis of Variance for grain yield of all the 10 genotypes evaluated
3 dates of sowing at 3 locations in 2008 and 2009 at Mali
|**significant at p≤0.01 alpha level; ***significant at
p≤0.001 alpha level
The season-long rainfall amount and mean maximum and minimum temperatures for each of the year, site and date of sowing combinations (environments) are presented in Table 1. Comparatively more rainfall was received in 2009 than in 2008 for all, except the RS planting date at Cinzana. Both the onset date and duration of the rainy season did not vary so much among the 2008 and 2009 seasons though 2009 had more rainfall at Farako (245 mm) and Sotuba (7.7 mm) but less rainfall at Cinzana (-16 mm) than 2008. Temperatures were also generally lower in 2009 than in 2008.
Variations in grain yield: Analysis of variance for grain yield revealed all main and interactive effects of year, location, date of sowing and genotype as significant sources of variation. The Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis also showed significant effects for genotype, environment and genotype and environment interaction (Table 2). Environmental effects accounted for 54% of the treatment sum of squares whiles 14 and 33% were attributed to genotype and GXE effects, respectively. Multiplicative effects showed that the first Interaction Principal Component Axis (IPCA1) captured 34% of the interaction SS in 16% of the interaction degrees of freedom (d.f.). Similarly, the IPCA2, IPCA3 and IPCA4 explained a further 18, 17 and 12% of the GXE sums of squares, respectively. In total, the AMMI2 model (G+E+IPCA1 and IPCA2) contained 84% of the treatment sums of squares, indicating that the AMMI model fits the data well and also justifies the use of AMMI2 (Table 2).
Table S1 presents the grain yield response patterns as influenced by the combination
of the factors studied. Grain yield performance, pooled over all factors, ranged
from 0 to 416 g m-2 and the responses for combinations of all other
factors ranged from 0 to 416 g m-2 and from 0 to 351 g m-2
for 2008 and 2009, respectively.
||Grain yield of sorghum, as influenced by the interaction of
genotype, date of sowing and location in 2008 and 2009
No grain yield was recorded for all cultivars under RS+2 at both Sudan savannah
and Sahel zones in 2008. In 2009, 4 plots (97-SB-150 under RS+1 and RS+2 and
Dancouma under RS and RS+1) at the Guinea Savannah and 1 plot (Dancouma
under RS+2) at the Sahel did not produce any grains. Grain yields of between
0 and 416 g m-2 were recorded across the effects of the full factorial
combinations at the Guinea Savannah whiles the respective ranges for the Sudan
savannah and Sahel were 0 to 312 and 0 to 351 g m-2 (Fig.
||Yield penalties for delayed sowing relative to RS as influenced
by genotypes sown at Farako, Sotuba and Cinzana in Mali during 2008 and
Yield penalty for delayed sowing: Delayed sowing generally resulted in reduced grain yield at all the sites. Yield penalty was observed in 84% (101 out of 120), ranged from 0.3 to 100% across locations and ranged from 0 to 100% across years. However, yield gains were observed in 16% (9 out of 120) of the experimental units with delayed sowing (Fig. 3).
Yield stability of cultivars: Interactive effects of the factors represented significant (p<0.01) sources of variation in mean grain yield (Table 2), suggesting an inconsistency in the performance of the accessions across the environments and necessitated the assessment of stability of performance for each of the ten cultivars in order to identify those with superior and/or stable yields. Of the seven measures of stability used, 2 (IPCA1 and ASV) measured static stability and 5 (RC, SUP, MR, MAD and VAR) measured dynamic stability. Table 3 shows results for grain yield and the stability indices (with ranks in brackets) for the accessions.
Whiles Dancouma was not ranked among the 3 most stable by any stability
index, each of CSM 388, Lakahieri and Lata-3 were ranked as such by 1 index.
Two indices ranked each of Boiguel and Wassa among the 3 most stable, whiles
each of 97-SB-150 and CSM 63E were ranked as such by 3 indices. No genotype
was ranked among the top 3 by either 4 or 5 indices, but Grinkan and IRAT 204
were each ranked as such by 6 indices. The number of indices that ranked the
genotypes among the middle 4 (ranks 4-7) in terms of stability were 0 for CS6
and Grinkan; 1 for IRAT 204; 2 for Wassa; 3 for 97-SB-150 and Dancouma;
4 for Lata-3; 6 for each of Boiguel and Lakahieri; 7 for
The number of indices that ranked the genotypes among the 3 least stable were
as follows: none for Boiguel and CSM 388; 1 for each of IRAT
204 and Lakahieri; 2 for each of Grinkan and 97-SB-150; 3 for
Lata-3; 4 for Wassa; 5 for each of CSM 63E and Dancouma
Coefficients of regression (RC; Finlay and Wilkinson, 1963)
as an index of stability considers a genotype with a value closest to 1 as most
stable. Genotypic values for this index ranged from 0.65 to 1.39 and CSM
388 was ranked as the most stable whiles Grinkan with the highest mean
grain yield was ranked as the least stable (Table 3). It ranked
Grinkan, IRAT 204, 97-SB-150 and Lakahieri as superior to all
the other accessions apart from Lata-3 and Wassa in all environments.
All cross-over interactions were observed between 20 and 133 g m-2.
Lata-3 crossed over to lower grain yields than Grinkan, IRAT 204,
97-SB-150, Lakahieri, Boiguel and CSM 388 at 34, 66, 87,
106, 133 and 133 g m-2, respectively, but had no cross over interaction
with Wassa, Dancouma and CSM 63E (over which it was superior in
all environments). Wassa which had lower grain yield than Grinkan
in all environments also crossed over from higher to lower yields than IRAT
204, 97-SB-150 and Lakahieri at 20 g m-2 (Fig.
Superiority index (SUP; Lin and Binns, 1988) ranks genotypes
with the smallest values (usually with better yields) as more stable. Genotypic
values for this index ranged from 2228 to 33520 and it ranked Grinkan
and Dancouma as the most stable and least stable accessions respectively.
The 5 most stable accessions including Grinkan, IRAT 204, 97-SB-150,
Lakahieri and CSM 388, produced more than average grain yield
whiles the 5 least stable genotypes included Lata-3, Boiguel, CSM
63E, Wassa and Dancouma, all lower than average grain yield (Table
Based on MAD, the accession with the lowest value is ranked as most stable
(Nassar and Huhn, 1987) and the values for the 10 accessions
ranged from 2.37 to 3.46. The index ranked IRAT 204 as the most stable
and Lata-3 as the least stable. Of the 5 most stable cultivars (IRAT
204, Grinkan, Wassa, Lakahieri and Dancouma),
Wassa and Dancouma had lower than average mean grain yields, whiles
CSM 388 and 97-SB-150 were the only among the 5 least stable cultivars
with more than average mean grain yields (Table 3).
||Mean grain yield (GY) of genotypes across 18 environments
and yield stability indices1 with entry ranks for yield stability
indices in brackets
|1: RC: regression coefficient, SUP: superiority, MR: mean
rank, MAD: mean absolute difference, VAR: variance; IPCA1: interaction principal
component axes, 2: GY figures followed by the same alphabets are not significantly
different at p≤0.05, 3: all values are very highly significant (p<0.001)
The Mean Rank (MR) stability index was proposed by Nassar
and Huhn (1987) and considers the cultivar with the lowest value as the
most stable. Values for this index ranged from 3.1 to 7.8, across genotypes,
with Grinkan and Dancouma being ranked as the most stable and
least stable cultivars, respectively. For this index, all the 5 most stable
accessions including Grinkan, IRAT 204, 97-SB-150, Lakahieri
and CSM 388 produced higher than average grain yields, whiles all the
5 least stable accessions including, Lata-3, Boiguel, CSM 63E,
Wassa and Dancouma had lower than average grain yields (Table
Rank Variance (VAR) is another index used by Nassar and
Huhn, 1987 and considers a cultivar with the lowest value as the most stable.
Values of the index across the 10 accessions ranged from 4.35 to 8.82. IRAT
204 was ranked as the most stable cultivar and Lata-3 was ranked
as the least stable. Among the 5 most stable accessions, Wassa was the
only one that had less grain yield than the grand mean, whiles 97-SB-150
was the only one among the 5 least stable ones with grain yield greater than
the grand mean (Table 3).
The first Interaction Principal Component axis of the AMMI analysis (IPCA1;
Purchase, 1997) can be taken as a measure of stability
that specifically focuses on Genotype X Environment interaction (GXE). The closer
the absolute value is to zero, the more stable the cultivar. IPCA1 scores for
the 10 accessions ranged from -9.00 to 10.38. CSM 63E with a score of
0.29 was ranked the most stable and Lata-3 with a score of 10.38 was
ranked as the least stable by this index. The 4 most stable accessions included
CSM 63E (0.29), Boiguel (0.51), Lakahieri (-2.99) and Dancouma
(4.02), whiles the 3 least stable genotype were Grinkan (-8.94), IRAT
204 (-9.00) and Lata-3 (10.38) (Table 3).
AMMI stability value (ASV; Purchase et al., 2000)
ranks the cultivar with the lowest value as the most stable. In this study,
the values of ASV ranged from 4.95 to 14.40. The ASV index ranked CSM 63E
as the most stable and Lata-3 as the most unstable, though grain yield
for CSM 63E was lower than for Lata-3. The 5 most stable accessions
(in decreasing order of stability) were CSM 63E Dancouma, Lakahieri,
CSM 3 88 and Boiguel whiles the 5 least stable accessions were
Wassa, 97-SB-150, CSM 388, IRAT 204, Grinkan
and Lata-3 (Table 3).
||Spearmans rank correlation among phenotypic stability
parameters after ranking (below diagonal, genotypic parameters correlation;
above diagonal, environmental parameters correlation)
|*,** Significant at p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively;
Correlations among stability parameters: Close similarities were observed among some of the stability measures for genotypes. As expected of indices for dynamic stability, SUP and MR ranked accessions with higher grain yields as more stable and vice versa, the only exceptions being the ranking of Boiguel and Lata-3 by MR. SUP and MR had same rankings for 8 of the accessions, reversed ranks for the remaining 2 (Table 3), were closely related (r = 0.96, p<0.01) and their respective relations with grain yield were perfect (r = 1; p<0.01) and near-perfect (r = 0.99; p<0.01) (Table 4).
MAD and VAR ranked the same accessions in the same order as the 4 most stable and also the same accession as the least stable, but did not reveal any clear patterns between grain yield levels and phenotypic stability of the genotypes. For example, Grinkan with the highest grain yield was ranked as the second most stable by both indices but Dancouma with the lowest grain yield as the 5th and 7th most stable by MAD and VAR respectively (Table 3). These indices were revealed as being very closely related (r = 0.95, p<0.01) (Table 4).
IPCA1 and ASV-the two indices of static stability considered-had similar ranks for 5 of the accessions (CSM 63E, Lakahieri, Wassa, 97-SB-150 and Lata-3), reversed ranks for 2 other accessions (Grinkan and IRAT 204) and did not show any trends or patterns in the rankings of the remaining 3 accessions (Boiguel, CSM 388 and Dancouma) (Table 3). These 2 indices had very high positive and significant correlation (r = 0.90, p<0.01) (Table 4).
Across environments, significant relations were observed between all the static and dynamic measures of stability, except between IPCA1 and SUP. Across genotypes, ASV was significantly related to RC, MR and SUP, whiles IPCA1 was significantly related to RC and MR but not SUP. Neither MAD nor VAR correlated significantly with any of the static measures of stability-IPCA1 and ASV- (Table 4).
AMMI selections for the environments: The best 4 genotypic selections
per environment based on AMMI are shown in Table 1. The analysis
revealed that mean grain yield ranged from 74 g m-2 (Dancouma) to
208 g m-2 (Grinkan) (Table A1 in appendix). The
difference in the ranking of genotypes across environments indicated the presence
of GXE interaction, which was confirmed by the significant effect of the GXE
(explaining 32.41% of the G+E+GE in the AMMI model). Grinkan was among
the top four ranks in 16 environments and dominated in 8 of them; Lakahieri
appeared in the top four ranks in 13 environments but did not dominate in any
of them; Lata-3 dominated 6 of the 9 environments in which it was ranked among
the top four; 97-SB-150 dominated 3 of the 9 environments in which it was ranked
among the top four; CSM 388 appeared within the top four ranks in 11 environments
but dominated in 1 only; IRAT 204 and Boiguel appeared among the top four in
9 and 4 environments respectively, but did not dominate in any; Wassa
did not dominate in any of the 2 environments, in which it appeared among the
top four; CSM 63E appeared within the top four ranks in only 1 environment,
in which Grinkan dominated; Dancouma neither dominated nor appeared
among the top 4 ranks in any of the environments (Table 1).
The genotypic differences and variations in environments accounted for the
considerable variability in mean grain yield (Fig. 2). Midge
(Contarinia sorghicola Coquillett) and terminal drought, accounted for
total losses in grain yield under RS+2 at Sudan Savannah and Sahel agro-ecologies
respectively in 2008. The reduction of grain yield in 84% of plots with delayed
sowing is consistent with results obtained by Kouressy et
al. (2008) but the remaining 16% where grain yield increased with delayed
sowing are more of exceptions than the norm and can be attributed to several
factors. Norwood (2001) reported yield gains with delayed
sowing for maize and attributed it to restriction of root development in the
earlier date of sowing by low soil temperature, but this reason is not tenable
in the case of this study because temperature and solar radiation (either deficit
or excess) did not pose any problems at any of the sites. Occurrence of frequent
and heavy rains from panicle initiation to grain development for RS and RS+1
at Farako in 2009, reduced grain yield via poor seed set (wetting of pollen
and/or poor anther dehiscence) and a complex of foliar diseases (not sampled
for identification). However these conditions abated during such phases of the
RS+2 sowing resulting in more efficient use of available resources, especially
solar radiation and consequently increased yield. This trend is also attributable
to the destruction of panicles by birds in the earlier dates of sowing, especially
at the 2 southern most sites of Farako and Sotuba due to asynchrony between
grain filling of sorghum and wild flora (main source of food for birds) - a
cause previously reported by some authors (Vaksmann et
al., 1996; Folliard et al., 2004; Kouressy
et al., 2008).
The study showed that SUP and MR can not only be substituted one for the other,
but can be more useful as yardsticks of yield performance rather than measures
of stability (Table 3). Similar observations were previously
reported by Purchase (1997) and Adugna
and Labuschagne (2003) for SUP. Information on works with sorghum that concentrate
on the use SUP, MR, MAD and VAR for classifying genotypes is very scanty. However,
similar relations, between SUP and MR as well as between IPCA1 and ASV, were
reported when these were used as measures of stability for sorghum performance
under low and high levels of phosphorus in the semi-arid tropics (Leiser,
Pooling genotypes from all the maturity groups resulted in non-significant
positive correlations between RC and yield (Table 3). This
is consistent with the findings of Saeed and Francis (1983)
who found no relationship between RC and grain yield for a pool of sorghum genotypes
and Gama and Hallauer (1980) for maize, but in variance
with the findings of Baihaki et al. (1975) and
Eberhart and Russell (1966) for soybean and sorghum respectively.
It appears possible to use medium maturing genotypes to produce higher mean
yields and also optimize grain yield in more favorable growing conditions. For
example, Grinkan is a medium maturing sorghum that combines the photoperiod
sensitivity with stay green and is revealed as not only having a higher-than-average
grain yield, but also very responsive to improvement in environment. The positive
and highly significant correlation between SUP and MR, MAD and VAR as well as
IPCA1 and ASV indicate that the relative stability ranking of these sorghum
genotypes are consistent when the different pairs of stability indices are used
separately, a concept proposed by Langer et al. (1979).
Selection of the top 4 accessions for each environment, based on AMMI analysis, revealed that Grinkan and Lata-3 featured in about 78% of the environments (14 of 18 environments). Grinkan and Lata-3 were identified as dominant genotypes in 8 and 6 environments respectively. Individually, Grinkan and Lata-3 appeared in the top four ranks in 16 and 9 environments respectively (Table 1).
Simultaneous assessment of IPCA scores for rice genotypes and environments
facilitated the interpretation and identification of specific interactions among
them because genotypes with positive IPCA scores were particularly adapted to
environments with positive IPCA scores and poorly adapted to environments with
a negative IPCA scores (Gauch, 1992), but the reverse
applied in this study. Grinkan, 97-SB-150, IRAT 204 and Lakahieri were the only
cultivars with negative IPCA1 scores, but were generally adapted to environments
with positive IPCA1 scores. Out of the 8 environments in which Grinkan
dominated, only one had a negative IPCA1 score (Table 1).
97-SB-150 also dominated in 3 environments, but only one had a negative IPCA1
score. IRAT 204 and Lakahieri did not dominate in any of the environments.
Grinkan and IRAT 204, with above average grain yield, were ranked among the top 3 most stable cultivars by 6 indices. These can be deployed for tactically adapting to climate change. The superiority of Grinkan across environments seems to be conditioned by a synergy of two traits (stay green and sensitivity to photo-period) that it possesses. Whiles the photoperiod sensitivity allowed the cultivar to delay flowering till when there is little or no risk to bird damage, the stay-green allowed for the supply of current assimilates to fill the growing grains. There was also neither incidence of foliar diseases on this cultivar at Farako, when all the accessions within the guinea race were heavily infected, nor lodging on plots with this cultivar at Cinzana as seen for other cultivars. These therefore resulted in a more efficient use of resources and the subsequent better performance of Grinkan. The benefits of photo-period sensitivity which conditions the length of cycle for the cultivars was not realized in all cases, though the trend suggests some yield advantages to some extent. For example Dancouma, which was latter than all the cultivars for all locations and dates of sowing was the least performing in terms of grain yield (Fig. 2). This shows that some additional traits are required to complement photoperiod sensitivity in ensuring optimum performance under the environments studied.
In conclusion, the study demonstrated that the current gene-pool of sorghum in the arid and semi-arid tropics could be used as a base for extracting cultivars for adapting to climate change if it does occur. Grinkan has a potential for co ping with the effects of climate change in the short-term. Combining photoperiod sensitivity with stay green trait (as in Grinkan) could be a laudable goal for breeders in the environments covered in this study. Further research, involving the use of a greater diversity of accessions and the assessment of physiological and molecular factors that could most likely condition the observations in this study, are required.
The authors are indebted to Messrs Mohammed Lamine Tekete, Mahamady Kane, Sekouba Sanogo, Alhassan Nientao, Sori, as well as Mrs Safiatu Sangare, all of IER-Sotuba, for their dedicated services both in the field and laboratory. This study was performed within the frame of the RISOCAS project addressing adaptation of African agriculture to climate change. Financial support by the German Ministry for collaboration and development through GIZ/BMZ (Project No. 07.7860.5-001.00) is gratefully acknowledged.
||Grain yield of sorghum, as influenced by the interaction of
location, date of sowing and genotype in 2008 and 2009 Genotypea
|a: see plant materials section under materials and methods
for details on genotypes, b: see table 1 for details on the environments,
particularly the dates of sowing