Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Short Communication
 

Enhanced Rice Seedling Growth by Clostridium and Pseudomonas



Febri Doni, I. Anizan, C.M.Z. Che Radziah, Wan Natasya Wan Ahmed, Abidah Ashari, Eka Suryadi and Wan Mohtar Wan Yusoff
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Local isolates Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 were studied with respect to their growth promoting effect on rice seedlings using a completely randomized design under greenhouse condition. Seedling growth components including rice seedling height, root length, wet weight, leaf number and biomass were used as parameters for this study. The results showed that Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 significantly enhanced rice seedling wet weight and biomass. This suggests that Clostridium sp. and Pseudomonas sp. deserve to be considered as potential rhizobacterial inoculants for sustainable rice production.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Febri Doni, I. Anizan, C.M.Z. Che Radziah, Wan Natasya Wan Ahmed, Abidah Ashari, Eka Suryadi and Wan Mohtar Wan Yusoff, 2014. Enhanced Rice Seedling Growth by Clostridium and Pseudomonas. Biotechnology, 13: 186-189.

DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2014.186.189

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=biotech.2014.186.189
 
Received: April 22, 2014; Accepted: June 28, 2014; Published: August 20, 2014



INTRODUCTION

Treatment of rice seedlings has been reported considered to be desirable due to its positive correlation to increase yield, resistant to disease and enhanced nutrients assimilation. Rice seedling growth can be promoted by Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) which are found naturally as soil bacteria that actively colonize plant roots (Doni et al., 2013; Bhattacharyya and Jha, 2012; Kloepper et al., 1980). These bacteria include Azotobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Clostridium (Ahemad and Kibret, 2014; Brown, 1974; Kavidmandan and Guar, 1971).

Pseudomonas have many traits that make them suitable as a biocontrol and growth promoting agents. They can grow rapidly in vitro for mass production, utilize seed and root exudates, colonize and multiply in the rhizosphere and spermosphere environments (Weller et al., 2002). The application of Pseudomonas sp. that improves plant growth was recorded such as in tomatoes (Manikandan et al., 2010), Piper nigrum L. (Paul and Sarma, 2006) and potatoes (Leben et al., 1987). However, limited studies have been conducted on the effect of Pseudomonas sp. isolates on rice growth from the perspective of bacterial inoculation timing. Mirza et al. (2006) reported using Pseudomonas inoculants soaked with 5 week old rice seedling. Kandasamy et al. (2009), Naganandini et al. (2011) and Shruti et al. (2013) reported use of Pseudomonas as seed priming. Anhar et al. (2011) reported Pseudomonas as inoculants mixed with 10-day-old rice seedlings soil. Pseudomonas soaked with rice seedlings was mentioned as able to alleviate environmental stress (Doni et al., 2013; Moldenhauer and Slaton, 2004). Furthermore, the use of local microbial isolates to improve rice growth under specific local condition has been proven superior in enhancing rice growth and physiological characteristic (Doni et al., 2014).

Bacteria from the genus Clostridium are also included as PGPR (Gamalero and Glick, 2011). Sengupta and Chaudhuri (1991) stated that bacteria of the genus Clostridium classified as nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Further, Tsavkelova et al. (2006) reported that Clostridium sp. is able to produce gibberellin that can enhance plant growth. A study done by Polyanskaya et al. (2002) revealed that Clostridium sp. inoculation on cucumber and barley significantly enhanced the growth of barley and cucumber. In rice plants application, a laboratory experiment conducted by Yoshida et al. (1973) found that Clostridium sp. was not a nitrogen fixer under limited source of organic matter in the soil.

To date, there is little report on the ability of Pseudomonas sp. in enhancing rice seedling growth. Similar for Clostridium sp., no information found with respect to its ability on enhancing rice seedling growth. Thus, our objective is to examine the ability of local rice rhizosphere isolates Clostridum sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 in enhancing rice seedling growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This experiment was conducted at the Fermentation Technology Laboratory and Greenhouse, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. A completely randomized design (with two treatments, one control and ten replications) was used for this experiment. The treatments were rice seedlings inoculated with Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1. Rice seedlings without any treatment were used as control.

Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 suspension preparation: Local isolates rhizobacteria were previously isolated from System of Rice Intensification (SRI) paddy field, Ledang, Johor, Malaysia namely Clostridum sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 were obtained from the Fermentation Technology Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Each isolate was grown separately in different media. Clostridium sp. FWM1 was grown on Reinforced Clostridial Agar (Oxoid Limited, UK) which was placed in a 3.5 L anaerobic jar (Merck KGaA, Germany) with Oxoid™ Anaerobic Gas Generating Kit (Oxoid Limited, UK) to create an anaerobic condition. Pseudomonas sp. FA1 was grown on King Agar B (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., USA). Both Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 were incubated for three days at 30°C temperatures. After three days of incubation, the bacterial cells were harvested using a loop and diluted with sterilized distilled water until the bacterial population density reached a value of 108 CFU mL-1.

Rice plant inoculation to bacterial suspension: Rice seeds of the variety MRQ74 were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol, followed by 5% sodium hypochlorite and washed by sterilized distilled water. The rice seeds were grown in autoclaved lateritic soil under greenhouse condition with ambient temperatures of 26-34°C that placed in a seedling tray. Ten five-day old rice seedlings were selected for each treatment then soaked in the respective microbial suspension in a flask containing 108 CFU mL-1 for 15 min. Rice plants soaked in distilled water served as control. The treated rice plants were grown singly in 15x15 cm plastic containing autoclaved lateritic soil. Water was maintained at 2 cm level from the soil surface and actively aerated by physically breaking up the soil surface once every ten days.

Measurement of rice growth components: Rice seedling growth components were measured after 15 days after transplanting. Plant height (cm) was measured from ground level to the tip of the longest leaf and leaf number was counted for each treatment and control. Root length (cm) was measured from the base of the stem to the longest root using a ruler and rice seedling wet weight (g) was measured using a digital scale. Rice biomass (g) measurement was done after rice roots were dried in the oven at a temperature of 65°C for seven days.

Statistical analyses: All data was statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The significance of the effect of the treatment was determined using F-test and to determine the significance of the difference between the means of the treatments, Least Significant Difference (LSD) was calculated at 5% probability level.

RESULTS

Rice seedlings wet weight and biomass treated with Pseudomonas sp. FA1 and Clostridium sp. FW1 were significantly greater than the control (untreated). However, it was not significant with respect to the plant height, root length and leaf number (Table 1, Fig. 1). The results revealed that Pseudomonas sp. FA1 has the highest ability to enhance rice biomass among all the treatments. On the other hand, Pseudomonas sp. FA1 and Clostridium sp. FW1 have equal ability in enhancing rice seedling wet weight.

Table 1:Effect of Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 on rice seedling growth
Image for - Enhanced Rice Seedling Growth by Clostridium and Pseudomonas
*ns: Not significant, **Means with the same letters within the column do not differ significantly according to LSD (p<0.05)

Image for - Enhanced Rice Seedling Growth by Clostridium and Pseudomonas
Fig. 1:
Use of Pseudomonas sp. FA1 and Clostridium sp. FWM1 resulted in better growth compared to control

DISCUSSION

The enhancement of rice seedling wet weight was double in rice inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. FWM1 compared to control. This result agrees with the finding of Leben et al. (1987) which reported the enhancement of tomato wet weight inoculated with Pseudomonas fluorescens. Xu and Gross (1986) reported that the enhancement of tomato growth by Pseudomonas sp. by mechanisms that enhance phosphorus availability to tomato plants. Furthermore, Rodriguez and Fraga (1999) stated that the ability of Pseudomonas sp. to solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphate compounds is a key factor for this bacterium to enhance plant growth.

Our study also reveals the ability of Clostridium sp. FWM1 to increase wet weight and biomass of rice seedlings compared to control. This study is valuable because, to date, there is no report regarding the application of Clostridium sp. in enhancing the growth of rice or other crops. The mechanisms employed by PGPR like the ability to synthesize plant-growth promoting metabolites, stimulate of root growth, produce IAA, control of plant stress and facilitate resource acquisition (nitrogen, phosphorus and essential minerals) are possible mechanisms employed by Clostridium sp. to enhance plant growth (Ahemad and Kibret, 2014; Lugtenberg and Kamilova, 2009; Polyanskaya et al., 2002).

CONCLUSION

The present study concludes that Clostridium sp. FWM1 and Pseudomonas sp. FA1 significantly enhance rice seedling wet weight and biomass. This study suggests that Pseudomonas sp. and Clostridium sp. could be used as plant growth promoters in increasing rice productivity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Special thanks are due to Captain Zakaria Kamantasha and Tuan Haji Marzuki Zin from SRI Lovely, Sik, Kedah, Malaysia for providing rice seeds for this study and for Tuan Haji Sulaiman Wagiman for allowing us to isolate Pseudomonas and Clostridium from his SRI Rice Field. Grant PRGS/1/12/STWN03/UKM/02/1 and PHUM-2014-002 from Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and grant ETP-2013-070, Komuniti-2012-001, Komuniti-2012-007 and DLP-2013-023 from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia are acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1:  Ahemad, M. and M. Kibret, 2014. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 26: 1-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Anhar, A., F. Doni and L. Advinda, 2011. Growth response of rice plants to pseudomonads fluorescent introduction. Eksakta, 1: 1-11.

3:  Bhattacharyya, P.N. and D.K. Jha, 2012. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 28: 1327-1350.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Brown, M.E., 1974. Seed and root bacterization. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 12: 181-197.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Doni, F., N.K.N. Al-Shorgani, E.M.M. Tibin, N.N. Abuelhassan and I. Anizan et al., 2013. Microbial involvement in growth of paddy. Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 5: 285-290.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Doni, F., A. Isahak, C.R.C.M. Zain and W.M.W. Yusoff, 2014. Physiological and growth response of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) to Trichoderma spp. inoculants. AMB Express, Vol. 4.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Gamalero, E. and B.R. Glick, 2011. Mechanisms used by Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Nutrient Management, Maheshwari, D.K. (Ed.). Chapter 2, Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN: 9783642210600, pp: 17-46

8:  Kavidmandan, S.K. and A.C. Guar, 1971. Effect of inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. on phosphate bacteria uptake and yield of maize. Curr. Sci., 40: 439-440.

9:  Kandasamy, S., K. Loganathan, R. Muthuraj, S. Duraisamy and S. Seetharaman et al., 2009. Understanding the molecular basis of plant growth promotional effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens on rice through protein profiling. Proteome Sci., Vol. 7.
CrossRef  |  

10:  Kloepper, J.W., J. Leong, M. Teintze and M.N. Schroth, 1980. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature, 286: 885-886.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Leben, S.D., J.A. Wadi and G.D. Easton, 1987. Effect of Pseudomonads fluorescent on potato growth and control of Verticillium dahlia. Phytophatology, 77: 1592-1595.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Lugtenberg, B. and F. Kamilova, 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 63: 541-556.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Manikandan, R., D. Saravanakumar, L. Rajendran, T. Raguchander and R. Samiyappan, 2010. Standardization of liquid formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 for its efficacy against Fusarium wilt of tomato. Biol. Control, 54: 83-89.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Mirza, M.S., S. Mehnaz, P. Normand, C. Prigent-Combaret, Y. Moenne-Loccoz, R. Bally and K.A. Malik, 2006. Molecular characterization and PCR detection of a nitrogen-fixing pseudomonas strain promoting rice growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 43: 163-170.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Moldenhauer, K. and N. Slaton, 2004. Rice Growth and Development. In: Rice Production Handbook, Slaton, N., L. Ford, J. Bernhardt, R. Cartwright and D. Gardisser et al. (Eds.). University of Kansas, Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock, USA., pp: 7-14

16:  Naganandini, S., D. Balachandar and K. Kumar, 2011. Diversity analysis of Pseudomonas in rice rhizosphere for multifaceted plant growth promotion. Acta Microbiologica Immunologica Hungarica, 58: 247-258.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  

17:  Paul, D. and Y.R. Sarma, 2006. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizhobacteria (PGPR)-mediated root proliferation in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) as evidenced through GS Root software. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 39: 311-314.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Polyanskaya, L.M., O.T. Vedina, L.V. Lysak and D.G. Zvyagintsev, 2002. The growth-promoting effect of Beijerinckia mobilis and Clostridium sp. cultures on some agricultural crops. Microbiology, 71: 109-115.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Rodriguez, H. and R. Fraga, 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv., 17: 319-339.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Sengupta, A. and S. Chaudhuri, 1991. Ecology of heterotrophic dinitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere of mangrove plant community at the Ganges river estuary in India. Oecologia, 87: 560-564.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

21:  Shruti, K., K. Arun and R. Yuvneet, 2013. Potential plant growth-promoting activity of rhizobacteria Pseudomonas spin Oryza sativa. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour., 3: 38-50.
Direct Link  |  

22:  Tsavkelova, E.A., S.Y. Klimova, T.A. Cherdyntseva and A.I. Netrusov, 2006. Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use: A review. Applied Biochem. Microbiol., 42: 117-126.
CrossRef  |  

23:  Xu, G.W. and D.C. Gross, 1986. Selection of fluorescent pseudomonads antagonistic to Erwinia carotovora and suppressive of potato seed piece decay. Phytopathology, 76: 414-422.
Direct Link  |  

24:  Weller, D.M., J.M. Raaijmakers, B.B.M. Gardener and L.S. Thomashow, 2002. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 40: 309-348.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

25:  Yoshida, T., R.A. Roncal and E.M. Bautista, 1973. Atmospheric nitrogen fixation by photosynthetic microorganisms in a submerged philippine soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 19: 117-123.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved