• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Biotechnology
  2. Vol 10 (6), 2011
  3. 534-539
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Biotechnology

Year: 2011 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 534-539
DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2011.534.539
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)

Vandana Kashyap, Bijaya Ketan Sarangi, Manoj Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Yadav

ABSTRACT


In vitro multiple shoot bud induction from leaf explants of eleven Indian cultivars of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.) under the influence of variable concentration of three different cytokinins namely BAP, KIN and TDZ on MS media has been studied. Callus of variable morphology and nature was observed for most of the cultivars except four cultivars IPA-2013, Pusa-9, T-7 and IPA-98-3 showing multiple shoot bud induction. Among cytokinins used BAP was found to be most effective. Further elongation of multiple shoot buds was achieved in the same media while rooting of regenerated multiple shoots were attempted in MS media supplemented with variable concentration of three different auxins namely NAA, IAA and IBA. Efficient rooting was achieved in the presence of NAA. Regenerated plants were successfully established in soil with acclimatization frequency varying from 25-50% with cultivar IPA-2013 showing the best response.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: August 04, 2011;   Accepted: October 26, 2011;   Published: December 12, 2011

How to cite this article

Vandana Kashyap, Bijaya Ketan Sarangi, Manoj Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Yadav, 2011. Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.). Biotechnology, 10: 534-539.

DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2011.534.539

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=biotech.2011.534.539

Search


INTRODUCTION


Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.) is an important high-protein grain legume of semi-arid tropics and sub-tropics cultivated in more than 50 countries of Asia, Africa and the Americas with India showing more than 80% of the world production (Nene and Sheila, 1990; Popelka et al., 2004; FAO, 2008). The overall production of pigeon pea is hampered by its susceptibility to number of biotic and abiotic stresses. The efforts to raise stress-resistant genotypes have met with limited success because of limited genetic variability amongst cultivated accessions and sexual incompatibility with wild relatives. The potential of transgenic technology for pigeon pea improvement has been visualized though there is paucity of efficient regeneration protocol due to its inherent recalcitrance to regeneration under in vitro tissue culture conditions.

In vitro regeneration by organogenesis and embryogenesis from callus or directly from different explants along with recent developments in transformation technology has been recently reviewed (Krishna et al., 2010). Reports of organogenesis from an unorganized callus are rare (Kumar et al., 1983). Multiple shoot production and regeneration via organogenesis from explants namely cotyledons, embryonic axes (Sarangi and Gleba, 1991), cotyledonary nodes from mature seeds (Prakash et al., 1994; Franklin et al., 1998) and seedling petioles (Srinivasan et al., 2004) has been reported. There have been attempts to initiate in vitro cultures from different tissue sources in pigeon pea (Geetha et al., 1998). The genotype dependent morphogenic potentiality of various explants of pigeon pea has also been demonstrated (Naidu et al., 1995), followed by genotype dependence of organogenesis from distal half of cotyledon explants without pre-existing meristem (Mohan and Krishnamurthy, 1998).

There have been reports of in vitro regeneration protocols suitable for genetic transformation of pigeon pea in recent years (Lawrence and Koundal, 2001; Satyavathi et al., 2003; Dayal et al., 2003; Thu et al., 2003; Mohan and Krishnamurthy, 2003; Prasad et al., 2004) revealing that the crop is not as recalcitrant as assumed earlier however, limited to some genotypes or cultivars. There is a need to assess the regeneration potential of different explants of existing cultivars to develop efficient regeneration protocol amenable for genetic transformation.

This study deals with assessment of in vitro regeneration from leaf explants for multiple shoot bud induction for selected eleven Indian cultivars of pigeon pea in the presence of different growth hormones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Seeds of pigeon pea cultivars viz., IPA-2013, IPA-3088, Pusa-9, IPA-34, IPA-204, IPA-242, T-7, IPA-61, IPA-337, IPA-341 and IPA-98-3 were procured from Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur.

Seeds were surface sterilized with 1% cetrimide for 10 min followed by 0.2% HgCl2 for 5 min and thoroughly rinsed 4-5 times with sterile distilled water and germinated aseptically on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) with 0.3% sucrose under cool white fluorescent light at 25±2°C. The morphogenic potential of leaf explants of 10, 15 and 20 days old seedlings were analyzed on different concentration of growth hormones viz., BAP, Kinetin and TDZ. For multiple shoot bud induction about 0.5 cm2 section from petiolar end of the leaf was cultured on MS media supplemented with variable concentration of growth hormones. The pH of all media was adjusted to 5.8 before adding agar and sterilized by autoclaving at 1.08 kg cm2 for 20 min. Cultures were incubated under light intensity of 1500l ux with 16 h light and 8 hs dark period at 25±20°C. For each experimental set up 10 explants were used with each concentration and experiment was repeated twice. After each successive subculture within 15 days, the well developed shoots were rooted on MS media augmented with three different concentration i.e., 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg L-1 of three growth regulators namely NAA, IAA and IBA. Finally few plants of each cultivar were successfully acclimatized to soil.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


In vitro regeneration via organogenesis has been extensively attempted as compared to somatic embryogenesis in pigeon pea using explants like apical meristem, undifferentiated callus, leaves, hypocotyls, cotyledons, cotyledonary nodes, epicotyls and embryonal axes for more than 51 diverse genotypes/cultivars (Krishna et al., 2010). Efforts have been made for developing in vitro regeneration protocol via organogenesis using leaf and leaf petiole as explants for more than 17 cultivars of pigeon pea (Eapen and George 1993; Eapen et al., 1998; Geetha et al., 1998; Singh et al., 2002; Dayal et al., 2003; De Villiers et al., 2008).

In the present study eleven cultivars of pigeon pea not attempted for regeneration studies earlier (Krishna et al., 2010) were assessed for multiple shoot bud induction and regeneration using leaf explants under the influence of different cytokinins namely 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP), Kinetin (KIN) and Thidiazuron (TDZ) cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) media. The leaf explants obtained from 10 days old in vitro germinated seedlings were found to be better for multiple shoot bud induction on MS media supplemented with different concentration of BAP, KIN and TDZ. In vitro regeneration using leaf lamina as explants with leaves from 5-12 -day-old seedlings has been reported (Eapen and George, 1993; Geetha et al., 1998).

The response of eleven cultivars for multiple shoot bud induction on MS media supplemented with variable concentration of BAP ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg L-1 revealed callus of diverse nature and morphology for most of the cultivars (Table 1). Only four cultivars namely IPA-2013, Pusa-9, T-7 and IPA- 98-3 showed appreciable multiple shoot bud induction (Fig. 1a-d). In case of cultivars IPA-2013 and T-7 higher concentration of BAP i.e., 3.0 mg L-1 was found to be effective for multiple shoot bud induction resulting with 6 and 5 buds per explants, respectively. In case of Pusa-9 and IPA- 98-3 a total of 6 buds per explants were obtained in 2.0 mg L-1 of BAP. Other cultivars did not responded for multiple shoot bud induction in variable concentration of BAP. Among different hormones used BAP has been reported to be most effective for in vitro regeneration of pigeon pea (Geetha et al., 1998; George and Eapen 1994). BAP alone has been used for regeneration via organogenesis using leaf explants of cultivars ICPL 93115 (Yadav and Padmaja, 2003) and one for unknown cultivar (Kumar et al., 1983). The response of these cultivars for multiple shoot bud induction in the presence of variable concentration of KIN ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg L-1 was very poor. In vitro regeneration via organogenesis of leaf explants is not reported in the presence of KIN alone though combination of BAP and KIN has been preferred by several workers (Tyagi et al., 2001; De Villiers et al., 2008).

The response of these eleven cultivars for multiple shoot bud induction in the presence of variable concentration of TDZ ranging from 0.05-0.4 mg L-1 is shown in Table 1. Only one cultivar IPA-2013 showed multiple shoot bud induction resulting in 6 buds per explants in the presence of TDZ at 0.05 mg L-1 while other cultivars revealed callus formation with variable morphology and nature (Table 1). TDZ-induced shoot regeneration in pigeon pea cultivars ICPL 161, ICPL 88039, UPS 120 has been reported (Eapen et al., 1998).

Multiple shoot buds obtained from leaf explants were subjected to rooting in full strength MS basal medium supplemented with three different hormones viz., NAA, IAA and IBA at three different concentrations namely 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 mg L-1. NAA was found to be best for inducing rooting in multiple shootlets derived from leaf explants.

Table 1: Multiple shoot bud induction, callus morphology from leaf explants of 10 days invitro germinated seedlings cultured on MS media supplemented with different concentration of BAP and TDZ after 8 weeks of culture
Image for - Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)
NR: No response, YWCC: Yellowish white compact callus, WGCC: Whitish green compact callus, GCC: Green compact callus, BCC: Brown compact callus, WCC: White compact callus, YWFC: Yellowish white friable callus, WGFC: Whitish green friable callus, YBCC: Yellowish brown compact callus, YGCC : Yellowish green compact callus, YGFC: Yellowish green friable callus

Image for - Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)
Fig. 1(a-d): Multiple shoot bud induction from leaf explants of different cultivars of Cajanus cajan on MS media supplemented with different concentration of BAP (a) IPA2013 (3.0 mg L-1), (b) Pusa-9 (2.0 mg L-1) and (c) T-7 in (3.0 mg L-1) and (d) IPA-98-3 (2.0 mg L-1)

The rooting response at different concentration of NAA for the cultivars IPA-2013, Pusa-9, T-7 and IPA- 98-3 showing efficient multiple shoot bud induction on MS media supplemented with BAP and TDZ is shown in Fig. 2a-d, respectively. Cultivar IPA-2013 showing efficient multiple shoot bud induction in the presence of BAP and TDZ revealed efficient rooting with 0.1 mg L-1 NAA (Table 2). Efficient rooting of multiple shoot bud induction from leaf explants in the presence of IBA, NAA and IAA has been reported (Srinivasan et al., 2004).

The rooted plantlets were hardened in small pots and transferred to the soil for acclimatization.

Table 2: Rooting responses of in- vitro regenerated multiple shoot buds from leaf explants of four cultivars of pigeonpea at different concentration of NAA recorded after 4 weeks of culture
Image for - Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)

Image for - Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)
Fig. 2(a-d): Rooting response for multiple shoot buds from leaf explants of different cultivars of Cajanus cajan on MS media supplemented with different concentration of NAA (a) IPA-2013 (0.1 mg L-1), (b) Pusa-9 (0.1 mg L-1), (c) T-7 (0.2 mg L-1) and (d) IPA-98-3 (0.1 mg L-1)

Image for - Assessment of In vitro Multiple Shoot Bud Induction from Leaf Explants among Eleven Indian Cultivars of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.)
Fig. 3(a-d): Acclimatized plants of the cultivars (a) IPA 2013, (b) Pusa-a, (c) T-7 and (d) IPA-98-3

The percentage acclimatization ranged from 25 to 50% with cultivar IPA-2013 showing best response. The acclimatized plants of cultivars IPA2013, Pusa-9, T-7 and IPA-98-3 are shown in Fig. 3a-d, respectively.

CONCLUSION


The response of eleven cultivars not attempted earlier for regeneration via organogenesis using leaf explants has been assessed for multiple shoot bud induction. The age of the explants donor seedling greatly influenced the differentiation of shoot buds with leaves from 10 days old seedling gave better response as compared to the leaves of 15, 20 and 25 days seedling explants. Further higher concentration of BAP (3.0 mg L-1) and lower concentration of TDZ (0.05 mg L-1) responded best for multiple shoot induction. NAA was found to be best for rooting of multiple shootlets derived from leaf explants as compared to IAA and IBA. Among the eleven cultivars studied the response of IPA-2013 for multiple shoot bud induction was best which could be further standardized for developing efficient in vitro regeneration protocol via organogenesis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT


The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. B.B. Singh and Dr. S.D. Dubey, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Dr. Harpal Singh, Punjab Agricultural University, Gurdaspur, Director Experiment Station, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar for providing seeds of the pigeon pea cultivars used in the present study.

REFERENCES


  1. Dayal, S., M. Lavanya, P. Devi and K.K. Sharma, 2003. An efficient protocol for shoot regeneration and genetic transformation of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) by using leaf explants. Plant Cell Rep., 21: 1072-1079.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  2. Eapen, S. and L. George, 1993. Plant regeneration from leaf discs of peanut and pigeonpea: Influence of benzyladenine, indoleacetic acid and indoleacetic acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 35: 223-227.
    Direct Link

  3. Eapen, S., S. Tivarekar and L. George, 1998. Thidiazuron-induced shoot regeneration in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult., 53: 217-220.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. FAO, 2008. Agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

  5. Franklin, G., R. Jeyachandran, G. Melchias and S. Ignacimuthu, 1998. Multiple shoot induction and regeneration of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) cv. Vamban from apical and axillary meristem. Curr. Sci., 74: 936-937.
    Direct Link

  6. Geetha, N., P. Venkatachalam, V. Prakash and L.G. Sita, 1998. High frequency induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration from seedling explants of pigeonpea (Cajanus caja L.). Curr. Sci., 75: 1036-1041.
    Direct Link

  7. George, L. and S. Eapen, 1994. Organogenesis and embryogenesis from diverse explants in pigeon pea (C. cajan L.). Plant Cell Rep., 13: 417-420.

  8. Krishna, G., P.S. Reddy, P.W. Ramteke and P.S. Bhattacharya, 2010. Progress in tissue culture and genetic transformation research in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Plant Cell Rep., 29: 1079-1095.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  9. Kumar, A.S., T.P. Reddy and G.M. Reddy, 1983. Plantlet regeneration from different callus cultures of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). Plant Sci. Lett., 32: 271-278.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Lawrence, P.K. and K.R. Koundal, 2001. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and molecular analysis of regenerated plants. Curr. Sci., 80: 1428-1432.
    Direct Link

  11. Mohan, K.L. and K.V. Krishnamurthy, 2003. Plant regeneration from decapitated mature embryo axis and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of pigeon pea. Biol. Plant, 46: 519-527.
    Direct Link

  12. Mohan, M.L. and K.V. Krishnamurthy, 1998. Plant regeneration in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) by organogenesis. Plant Cell Rep., 17: 705-710.
    CrossRef

  13. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473-497.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Naidu, R.B., D.D. Kulkarni and K.V. Krishnamurthy, 1995. Genotype dependent morphogenic potentiality of various explants of a food legume, the pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant., 31: 26-30.
    Direct Link

  15. Nene, Y.L. and V.K. Sheila, 1990. Pigeonpea: Geography and Importance. In: The Pigeonpea, Nene, Y.L., S.H. Hall and V.K. Sheila (Eds.). CAB International, Wellingford, UK., pp: 1-14.

  16. Popelka, J.C., N. Terryn and T.H.V. Higgins, 2004. Gene technology for grain legumes: Can it contribute to the food challenge in developing countries?. Plant Sci., 167: 195-206.

  17. Prasad, V., V.V. Satyavathi, Sanjaya., K.M. Valli, A. Khandelwal, M.S. Shaila and G. Lakshmi Sita, 2004. Expression of biologically active Hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein 4 of Peste des petits ruminants virus in transgenic pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Plant Sci., 166: 199-205.

  18. Sarangi, B.K. and Y.Y. Gleba, 1991. Direct multiple regeneration in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Acta Hortic., 289: 149-150.
    Direct Link

  19. Satyavathi, V., V. Prasad, A. Khandelwal, M. Shaila and L.G. Sita, 2003. Expression of hemagglutinin protein of Rinder pest virus in transgenic pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) plants. Plant Cell. Rep., 21: 651-658.
    CrossRef

  20. Prakash, S.N., D. Pental and N. Bhalla Sarin, 1994. Regeneration of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) from cotyledonary node via multiple shoot formation. Plant Cell Rep., 13: 623-627.
    Direct Link

  21. Singh, N.D., L. Sahoo, Sonia and P.K. Jaiwal, 2002. In vitro shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from cotyledonary node and leaf explants of pegionpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 8: 133-140.

  22. Srinivasan, T., V.K. Verma and P.B. Kirti, 2004. Efficient plant regeneration in pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] using seedling petiole. Curr. Sci., 86: 30-32.

  23. Thu, T.T., T.T.X. Mai, E. Dewaele, S. Farsi, Y. Tadesse, G. Angenon and M. Jacobs, 2003. In vitro regeneration and transformation of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]. Mol. Breed., 11: 159-168.
    CrossRef

  24. Tyagi, A.P., L. Comai and B. Byers, 2001. Comparison of plant regeneration from root shoot and leaf explants in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) cultivars. SABRAO J., 33: 59-71.

  25. De Villiers, S., Q. Emongor, R. Njeri, E. Gwata and D. Hoisington et al., 2008. Evaluation of the shoot regeneration response in tissue culture of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan [L.] Millsp.) varieties adapted to eastern and southern Africa. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 587-590.
    Direct Link

  26. Yadav, P.B.S. and V. Padmaja, 2003. Shoot organogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaf segments of pigeonpea. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult., 73: 197-200.
    CrossRef

Search


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved