|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
A Complete Sequence of the 16S rRNA Gene of a Novel Streptomyces coelicolor(AB588124) (QU66c-2002) Isolated from the Soil of Qatar |
|
I.A. Mahasneh,
R.F. Al-Thani,
M.A. Abuannadi
and
M.A. Qandil
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
The aim of this study was to determine the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene and thus to conduct the phylogenic position of the naturally occurring wild type strain of Streptomyces QU66C. Here we show conclusively the full sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of a novel wide type strain of Streptomyces coelicolor which has been isolated from the soil of Qatar and thus characterized on the basis of its phenotypic and genotypic features. In comparison with the homologous strains in GeneBanks, the phylogenic position of the isolate is in between S. coelicolor A3 (2) (Y00411) (NC003888) and S. coelicolor (C) (EF371438). The sequence of present strain has been deposited in the International Nucleotide Sequence Databases) (INSD) in the GenBanks/DDBJ/EMBL/NCBI) and assigned an accession number of AB588124 and thus the strain is being known as Streptomyces coelicolor (AB588124) (QU66C-2002). Present strain shows a similarity and identities of 99.40, 99.40, 99.40, 99.33 and 99.31% with a score value of 2693, 2693, 2687, 2673 and 2673 bits for Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) (Y00411) (NC003888), S. violaceoruber AF503494 (ancient name for S. coelicolor and S. lividans), S. lividans AF503498, S. lividans AB184826 and S. coelicolor (C) (EF371438), respectively. In comparison with the S. coelicolor clones in Sanger database the strain shows a positive high scoring alignment similarity of 99.4% with score of 6907 with five clones of S. coelicolor A3 (2) (AL939116, AL939119, AL939124, AL939114, AL939108) and a 99% similarity with a score of 6889 for AL939110. Similarly, the BLAST search on EMBL GeneBAnk shows a 99.40% similarity with 2 strains of S. violaceoruber (AF503494, AF503492) with high score of 2738.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: March 03, 2011;
Accepted: May 06, 2011;
Published: June 03, 2011
|
|
INTRODUCTION
There is a world wide growing demand for production of a new generation of
antibiotics particularly due to the increase of resistant pathogens, evolution
of novel diseases and toxicity of the currently used compounds (Silbergeld
et al., 2008; Hakvag et al., 2008).
The problem of multi-resistance is being progressively increasing due to the
misuse of the available antibiotics (Harrison and Svec,
1998; Larson, 2007; Marino, 2008;
Hawkey, 2008). The Streptomyces genus is the
most diversified groups of Eubacteria, widely spread around all environments
particularly in the desert soil where most common habitats occurs (Dunbar
et al., 1999). The biotechnological importance of Sterptomyces
as producers for the majority of antibiotics in use today keeps them as the
main natural stock for screening programs (Berdy, 2005;
Bull and Stach, 2007; El-Sherbiny
et al., 2009; Akanji et al., 2011;
Sinha et al., 2011). In addition, empirical screening
using various assays has revealed that Streptomyces are capable to produce antibiotics
with a broad spectrum activity in both human and veterinary medicine such as
antibacterial, antifungal, anti-cancer, anti-parasitic and anti-viral (Atta
and Ahmad, 2009; Morakchi et al., 2009) as
well as some immune-suppressants (Watve et al., 2001)
and several enzymes important in the food and other industries. There are two
main approaches being used for discovery of new antibiotics; screening programs
for natural strains and mutation protocols (Busti et
al., 2006; Fiedler et al., 2008). As
a result of this, more than 500 species of Streptomyces have been isolated
(Zaitlin et al., 2003; Euzeby,
2008; Hakvag et al., 2008; Morakchi
et al., 2009). Among those was the model organism Streptomyces
coelicolor A3 (2) of which its complete genome was published (Bentley
et al., 2002) making the species as the most studied member of the
genus world-wide and is becoming the a genetic paradigm for the actinomycetes
(Swiercz et al., 2008; O'Rourke
et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2010). Further
more, biotechnology researchers have begun using Streptomyces species
for heterologous expression of proteins over the traditionally known Escherichia
coli, as the latter was not capable of protein glycosylation or folding
(Payne et al., 1990; Brawner
et al., 1991; Hopwood, 1999; Hu
et al., 2000; Sioud et al., 2009).
Recently there have been world wide interest on the molecular techniques (Abu
Bakar et al., 2010; Onasanya et al.,
2010; Sifour et al., 2010; Zolgharnein
et al., 2010) particularly the 16S rRNA phylogenic analysis which
provides a great impact on Streptomyces systematic and minimizing wrong
identification (Anderson and Wellington, 2001; Kim
et al., 2004; Jiang et al., 2007;
Singh et al., 2009). Taxonomically, S. coelicolor
A3 (2) belongs to the species of S. violaceoruber and not a validly described
separate species which should not to be mistaken for the actual S. coelicolor
(Muller). The present Streptomyces strain QU66C has been isolated from
the soil of Qatar during screening program and was selected as presumable strain
of S. coelicolor. The aim of this study was to determine the phylogenetic
position of the naturally occurring wild type strain of Streptomyces
QU 66C which has proven to have high potential of production a novel antibiotic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strain and culture conditions: The investigated strain was
isolated from desert soil of Qatar (Abu-Smra area) during a screening program
for a novel antibiotic during the year 2002. The strain was then deposited in
the Qatar University Culture Collection (QUCC) as strain QU66C and later on
(during the partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene) it was deposited in the NCIMB
Ltd, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK as strain NCSQ 17869 during 2003. Phenotypic characteristics
of the strain were determined after examination as described previously (Garrity,
2010; Williams et al., 1983a, b).
Cultures of strain from different growth stages were examined using both phase-contrast
microscope and electron microscope.
The screening for optimum growth of the strain revealed that the Nutrient Agar
(NA) and Nutrient Broth (NB) (each supplemented with 1% starch) were the optimum
media, known hereinafter as NAS and NBS, respectively. The pure culture was
then maintained in NBS medium at 37°C and culture conditions were kept as
described previously (Kieser et al., 2000).
Assay for antibiotics: The antimicrobial assay for the strain antibiotics
was conducted using both of inhibition zone method and the minimum inhibition
concentration. The production of antibiotics by present strain was determined
as described earlier (Kieser et al., 2000) and
as follows: The Actinorhodin (Act) was extracted using the 1 N KOH for pH adjustment
to 8.0 before A640 was measured. The undecylprodigiosin (Red) was extracted
using 0.5 M HCl for acidification before A530 was measured. The calcium-dependent
lipopeptide antibiotics (CDA) was detected as normally assayed (Kieser
et al., 2000). For production of the antibiotic droplets on the surface
of the colonies, strain was cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and incubated
for several days.
Analysis of 16S rRNA gene: During 2007, the 16S rRNA gene sequence was determined. The genomic DNA of the Streptomyces QU66C strain was extracted using the PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent kit (No: 4367554) according to the protocol stated by manufacturer (Applied Biosystem, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the MicroSeq full gene 16S rRNA Bacterial Identification kit (No: 4349155) and the PCR Amp system 9700 according to the manufacturer protocol (Applied Biosystem, USA). The PCR program consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min to activate the AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, then 30 cycles (30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C , 45 sec at 72°C for denaturation, annealing and extension, respectively), followed by 10 min at 72°C for final extension. Then, the PCR product was purified using wizard PCR preps DNA purification system kit (No: A7231) according to the manufacturer (Promega, USA). The sequencing mix then were mixed and run on the PCR for 25 cycles (10 sec at 96°C, 5 sec at 50°C, 4 min at 60°C for denaturation, annealing and extension, respectively). The reaction was terminated with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The excess dye terminators and primer were removed from the sequencing mix using DyeEX® 2.0 spin kit (No: 63204) according to the manufacturer (Qiagen, USA).
The 16S rRNA gene sequence was conducted using the genetic analyzer (ABI Prism
GA310, Applied Biosystem, USA). The GA310 analyzer is equipped with a compatible
a data collecting software (v 3.0) and a Microbial Identification Software MicroSEQ®
ID (v 2.0). The software allows the user to create consensus sequences and to
compare it with the microbial library of the full gene of 16S rRNA, available
in the Applied Biosystem (http://www.appliedbiosystems.com).
Pairwise sequence alignment: The full gene sequence of present strain
QU66C was aligned automatically using the BLAST against the gene library available
for Streptomyces species in the NCBI (www.ncbinlm.nih.gov),
Sanger Institute (http://www.sanger.ac.uk),
DDBJ (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp)
and EMBL-EBI GeneBank (http://www.ebi.ac.uk).
Multiple sequence alignment: The phylogenetic analysis was constructed
using Nighbor-Joinin tree (Saitou and Nei, 1987; Dopazo,
1994; Tamura et al., 2007) of the isolated
strain using the BLAST and CLUSTAL W (1.83) available in the DDBJ GeneBank.
The closely related homologous strains were identified, retrieved and compared
to the sequence of the strain QU66C, using CLUSTAL W (version 3.2) available
on the Biology StudyBench (http://woekbench.sds.edu).
Statistical criteria for species identification: Identification of species
through sequence similarity was determined based on the criteria used by Bosshard
et al. (2003) where if the difference between the query and the compared
strain is 1-1.5% (14-22 bp), 1.5-5.0% (23-72 bp) and 5.-0-7.0% (72-98 bp), then
the query strain should be given to the same species, genus or a different genus,
respectively.
Genebank accession number: The complete sequence (1404 bp) of the 16S rRNA gene of QU66C strain has been deposited in the International Nucleotide Sequence Databases (INSD) (DDBJ GenBank), EMBL-EBI Bank (European Bioinformatics Institute and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). RESULTS Physiological and biochemical features: The physiological and biochemical characteristics of the isolate are given in Table 1. The examined features of the investigated strain QU66C showed the typical morphology of Streptomyces on various agar plates, aerobic, gram-positive, non-motile, non-acid fast.
The morphology of colonies were typically similar to that of S. coelicolor
where it showed the actinorhodin production and then its conspicuous red color
diffusion in the media after 48 h of growth. The isolate was exposed to the
most notable test for the S. coelicolor is that the red-blue acid-base
indicator.
Table 1: |
Physio-biochemical features and antimicrobial profile of the
isolate strain streptomyces coelicolor AB588124 (QU66C-2202). Bacterial
strains used as control (*) |
 |
Thus the colonies that become red-purple because of actinorhodin production
will rapidly turn blue on fuming the colonies with ammonia, consistent with
the known pH indicator properties of the compounds.
The screening for optimum growth of the strain revealed that the NAS and NBS were the optimum solid and liquid media respectively. For production of the antibiotic droplets on the colonies surface, isolate was cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) for 5 days before several droplets (3-5) appeared on the top of each colony. The isolate has the ability to utilize all tested carbon sources (D-glucose, D-xylose, D-arbinose, D-manitol, D-lactose, D-succurose, D-sorbitol, D-starch). The isolate showed a positive for catalase, amylase, nitrate reductase, starch hydrolyses, gelatin hydrolyses, casein break down but was negative for ornithine, indole and urease as well as hydrogen sulfide production.
Antimicrobial profile of strain QU66C: The antimicrobial profiles of
the isolate is given in Table 1. The antibiotic of the strain
showed antimicrobial activity against some local medical isolates (all brought
from Hamad Hospital, Qatar) such as: Escherichia coli, Bacillus
cerus, Micrococcus luts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus
aureus, S. epidermis and Klebsilla sp.
|
Fig. 1: |
The full sequence of 16S rRNA gene of the novel streptomyces
coelicolor AB588124 (isolate QU66C) with a length of 1404 bp. IUPAC codes:
R (A or G), Y (C or T), M (A or C), S (G or C), W (A or T), K (G or T ) |
It also showed antibacterial activity against the control organisms (brought
from the Central Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Jordan) such as: Staphylococcus
aureus MRSA ATCC 25023, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Escheria
coli ATCC 25922. The isolate showed an activity against Candida albicans
but not against Penicillum IM56, Penicillium IM 65/3).
The antibiotics production by present strain was determined as described above in the Materials and Methods section. The stain showed a high potential for antibiotics production (data in preparation for the coming study). The strain is capable of production of all antibiotics known for the S. coelicolor.
Comparative analysis 16S rRNA sequence of QU66C strain: A full sequence
(1404 bp) of the gene which is given in Fig. 1. Initially
a partial sequence of the gene (480 bp) was determined (data not shown) in the
National Institute for Multicultural Competence (NIMC, UK) during 2002 but the
library search-report at that time was not enough to determine the species level,
therefore we have waited seven years until we have imported the GA310 sequencer.
The full sequence (1404) of present strain was BLASTED with the microbial genome
library of the full gene of 16S rRNA, available in the Applied Biosystem (http://www.appliedbiosystems.com).
The library search report for the top 20 matching strains were obtained and
thus the phylogenetic tree of the top 5 homologous was conducted (Fig.
3). The phylogenetic destination of the strain QU66C is in between S.
coelicolor A3 (2) (Y00411) (NC003888) and S. coelicolor (C) (EF371438)
(Fig. 3). The summary of the BLAST given in Table
2 shows that the query strain QU66C has a similarity and identities of 99.40,
99.40, 99.40, 99.33 and 99.31% with variable score value of 2693, 2693, 2687,
2673 and 2673 bits for Streptomyces coelicolor A3 (2) (Y00411) (NC003888),
S. violaceoruber AF503494 (ancient name for S. coelicolor and
S. lividans), S. lividans AF503498, S. lividans AB184826
and S. coelicolor (C) (EF371438), respectively. The positions of the
mismatched between the strain QU66C and the compared strains S. violaceoruber
AF503494 are given in Table 3.
The graphical BLAST and summary of the 16S rRNA sequence of the isolate QU66C
are given in Fig. 2 and Table 2, respectively.
The searching report out of the S. coelicolor database shows that the
strain QU66C has a positive high scoring alignment similarity of 99.40% with
score of 6907 with five clones of S. coelicolor A3 (2) (AL939116, AL939119,
AL939124, AL939114, AL939108); whilst shows a 99.00% similarity with a score
of 6889 for AL939110.
Table 3: |
Locations of the different 17 base pairs between the full
sequence of 16S rRNA gene of the Streptomyces coelicolor AB588124
(QU66C) and that of S. violaceoruber AF503494. IUPAC codes: R (A
or G), Y (C or T), M (A or C), S (G or C), W (A or T), K (G or T ) |
 |
 |
Fig. 2 (a-b): |
Graphical BLAST of QU66C (1404 bp) as compared to the S.
coelicolor complete sequence (8, 668, 907 bp) available in Sanger database
(http://blast.wustl.edu,
[email protected]) (b) The visible feature range of
the 16S rRNA of the isolate QU66C as appeared in EMBL-EBI Bank (http://www.ebi.ac.uk) |
|
Fig. 3: |
The inferred phylogenetic tree of the isolate strain (specimen)
Streptomyces coelicolor AB588124 (QU66C-2002) using the Neighbor-Joining
method |
A similar results was obtained when BLAST search was carried out on EMBL BLAST
in addition to 2 strains of S. violaceoruber (AF503494, AF503492) with
high score of 2738. Furthermore when the sequence of QU66C was BLASTED with
the DDBJ database using the CLUSTAL W (1.83), the strains showed a similarity
of 99.40% for the closest 3 strains of S. coelicolor EF371438, S.
violaceoruber AB184833 and S. lividans AB 184695.
We have therefore, shown conclusively that on the basis of both phenotypic
and genotypic features and according to the criteria reported earlier (Bosshard
et al., 2003), the strain isolate QU66C should be assigned as Streptomyces
coelicolor (QU66C-2002). The complete sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of S.
coelicolor (QU66C) strain has been deposited in the International Nucleotide
Sequence Databases (INSD) in the GenBank/DDBJ (connected with GeneBank/EMBL/NCBI)
and assigned an accession number of AB588124 under a voucher specimen (Professor
Ihsan Mahasneh QU66C-2002). The strains is therefore, hereinafter, known as
Streptomyces coelicolor (AB588124) (QU66C-2002).
DISCUSSION
The present strain S. coelicolor AB588124 (QU66C-2002) has showed a
marked and conspicuous phenotypic and genotypic features of S. coelicolor
compared with homologous strains in different GeneBanks (Fig.
1-3; Table 2, 3) which
support present results. The strain was highly (99.40%) identical to S.
coelicolor A3 (2), S. violaceoruber and S. lividans. This
is in full agreement with a previous result reported earlier using the 16S rRNA
on the molecular taxonomy of Streptomyces collected from different GeneBanks
and collections (ATCC, DSM, JCM) where both species S. lividans and S.
coelicolor has given a possibility to be classified as S. violaceoruber
(Chistova et al., 1995). The taxonomy of S.
lividans is closely related to S. coelicolor because it produces
the same four types of antibiotics but the Act and Red genes are normally poorly
expressed under usual growth condition (Hosoya et al.,
1998). The majority of the members of this group share highly similar phenotypes
and 16S rRNA sequences and thus the biosynthetic gene clusters required for
production of this antibiotic must be transferred from S. coelicolor
into the S. lividans (Lai et al., 2002;
Haifing et al., 2002).
Historically, it has been known for many years that the most notable indicator
for the S. coelicolor is that the red-blue acid-base test (Kieser
et al., 2000). Present strain started to release its pigments that
are blue/green in alkali and red in acidic conditions, thereby giving the bacterial
colonies/culture those colors under the respective conditions. Thus the colonies
of present isolate that become red-purple because of actinorhodin production
have rapidly turned blue on fuming with ammonia which is consistent with the
known pH indicator properties of the compounds (Kieser et
al., 2000). Based on phenotypic and genotypic data, it has been shown
conclusively that the isolate QU66C is a novel wild type strain for Qatar and
has been given the its name and accession of S. coelicolor AB588124 (QU66C-2002)
which to be used in antibiotic production. The S. coelicolor produces
pigments, complex lipids, signal molecules and four kinds of antibiotics including
the cyclopentanon methylenomycin, lipoptide Calcium-Dependent Antibiotic (CDA),
blue polyketide Actinorhodin (Act) and red tripyrcol undecylprodigiosin (Feitelson
et al., 1986; Liu et al., 2005).
The 16S rRNA sequence data provide a conclusive evidence that present isolate
is phylogenetically identical to S. coelicolor A3 (2), S. violaceoruber
and S. lividans.
CONCLUSION
The present results shows that the present strain is a novel wide type strain
capable of antibiotics production without any genetic alteration as it appeared
in other strains. Moreover, the present results provides a better understanding
of the role of RNase III gene (AbsB) encoded the mRNA for the AdpA transcription
factor on regulation of antibiotic production (Lee et
al., 2006; O'Rourke et al., 2009; Anderson
and Wellington, 2001; Payne et al., 1990).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are gratefully to Al-al-Bayt University for providing leave of Professor Ihsan Mahasneh to Qatar University during 2001-2005. Authors are also gratefully to both Qatar University and Al al-Bayt for providing laboratories and kits for gene analysis.
|
REFERENCES |
Abu Bakar, F., A.S. Abdulamir, N. Nordin and T.S. Yoke, 2010. Methods for precise molecular detection of probiotic microflora: Using adjusted molecular biology protocols, primer sets and PCR assays. Biotechnology, 9: 25-32. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Akanji, B.O., J.O. Ajele, A. Onasanya and O. Oyelakin, 2011. Genetic fingerprinting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in nosocomial infection as revealed by RAPD-PCR markers. Biotechnology, 10: 70-77. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Atta, H.M. and M.S. Ahmad, 2009. Antimycin-A antibiotic biosynthesis produced by Streptomyces sp. AZ-AR-262: Taxonomy, fermentation, purification and biological activities. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 3: 126-135. Direct Link |
El-Sherbiny, S.A., Y.M. El-Ayoty, M.F. Ghaly and N.S. Fleafil, 2009. Evaluation for the production of antialgal substances from Streptomyces neyagawaensis. Biotechnology, 8: 405-415. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Haifing, H., Q. Zhang and K. Ochi, 2002. Activation of antibiotic biosynthesis by specified mutations in the rpoB gene (encoding the RNA polymerase β subunit) of Streptomyces lividans. J. Bacteriol., 184: 3984-3991. PubMed |
Feitelson, J.S., A.M. Sinha and E.A. Coco, 1986. Molecular genetics of red biosynthesis in streptomyces. J. Nat. Prod., 49: 988-994. PubMed |
Silbergeld, E.K., J. Graham and L.B. Price, 2008. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance and human health. Ann. Rev. Public Health, 29: 151-169. CrossRef |
Hakvag, S., E. Fjarvik, K.D. Josefsen, E. Ian, T.E. Ellingsen and S.B. Zotchev, 2008. Characterization of Streptomyces spp. Isolated from the sea surface microlayer in the Trondheim Fjord, Norway. Mar. Drugs, 6: 620-635. PubMed |
Harrison, J.W. and T.A. Svec, 1998. The beginning of the end of the antibiotic era? Part II. Proposed solutions to antibiotic abuse. Quintessence Int., 29: 223-229. PubMed |
Larson, E., 2007. Community factors in the development of antibiotic resistance. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 28: 435-447. CrossRef |
Marino, P.L., 2008. Antimicrobial Therapy. In: The ICU Book, Marino, P.L. (Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Hagerstown, pp: 817
Hawkey, P.M., 2008. The growing burden of antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 62: i1-i9. CrossRef |
Dunbar, J., S. Takala, S.M. Barns, J.A. Davis and C.R. Kuske, 1999. Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 65: 1662-1669. Direct Link |
Berdy, J., 2005. Bioactive microbial metabolites: A personal view. J. Antibiot., 58: 1-26. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Bull, A.T. and J.E.M. Stach, 2007. Marine actinobacteria: New opportunities for natural product search and discovery. Trends Microbiol., 15: 491-499. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Morakchi, H., A. Ayari, M. Taok, D. Kirane and N. Cochet, 2009. Characterization of Streptomyces strain SLO-105 isolated from Lake Oubeira sediments in North-East of Algeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 6332-6336. Direct Link |
Watve, M.G., R. Tickoo, M.M. Jog and B.D. Bhole, 2001. How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces? Arch. Microbiol., 176: 386-390. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Busti, E., P. Monciardini, L. Cavaletti, R. Bamonte, A. Lazzarini, M. Sosio and S. Donadio, 2006. Antibiotic-producing ability by representatives of a newly discovered lineage of actinomycetes. Microbiology, 152: 675-683. CrossRef |
Fiedler, H.P., C. Bruntner, J. Riedlinger, A.T. Bull and G. Knutsen et al., 2008. Proximicin A, B and C, novel aminofuran antibiotic and anticancer compounds isolated from marine strains of the actinomycete Verrucosispora. J. Antibiot., 61: 158-163. PubMed |
Zaitlin, B., S.B. Watson, J. Ridal, T. Satchwill and D Parkinson, 2003. Actinomycetes in Lake Ontario: Habitants and geosmin and MIB production. Am. Water Works Assoc. J., 95: 113-118. Direct Link |
Euzeby, J.P., 2008. Genus streptomyces. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature. http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/s/streptomycesa.html.
Bentley, S.D., K.F. Chater, A.M. Cerdeno-Tarraga, G.L. Challis and N.R. Thomson et al., 2002. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature, 417: 141-147. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Swiercz, J.P., Hindra, J. Bobek, J. Bobek and H.J. Haiser et al., 2008. Small non-coding RNAs in Streptomyces coelicolor. Nuclic Acids Res., 36: 7240-7251. PubMed |
O'Rourke, S., A. Wietzorrek, K. Fowler, C. Corre, G.L. Challis and K.F. Chater, 2009. Extracellular signalling, translational control, two repressors and an activator all contribute to the regulation of methylenomycin production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol., 71: 763-778. PubMed |
Xu, W., J. Huang, R. Lin, J. Shi and S.N. Cohen, 2010. Regulation of morphological differentiation in S. coelicolor by RNase III (AbsB) cleavage of mRNA encoding the AdpA transcription factor. Mol. Microbiol., 75: 781-791. PubMed |
Payne, G.F., N. DelaCruz and S. Coppella, 1990. Improved production of heterologous protein from Streptomyces lividans. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 33: 395-400. PubMed |
Brawner, M., G. Poste, M. Rosenberg and J. Westpheling, 1991. Streptomyces: A host for heterologous gene expression. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2: 674-681. PubMed |
Hopwood, D.A., 1999. Forty years of genetics with Streptomyces: From in vivo through in vitro to in silico. Microbiology, 145: 2183-2202. Direct Link |
Hu, Z., A.D. Hopwood and C. Khosla, 2000. Directed transfer of large DNA fragments between Streptomyces species. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 66: 2274-2277. Direct Link |
Sifour, M., H.M. Saeed, T.I. Zaghloul, M.M. Berekaa and Y.R. Abdel-Fattah, 2010. Isolation of lipase gene of the thermophilic Geobacillus stearothermophilus strain-5. Biotechnology, 9: 55-60. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Sinha, V., R. Mishra, A. Kumar, A. Kannan and R.K. Upreti, 2011. Amplification of arsH gene in Lactobacillus acidophilus resistant to arsenite. Biotechnology, 10: 101-107. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Sioud, S., B. Aigle, I. Karray-Rebai, S. Smaoui, S. Bejar and L. Mellouli, 2009. Integrative gene cloning and expression system for Streptomyces sp. US 24 and Streptomyces sp. TN 58 bioactive molecule producing strains. J. Biomed. Biotechnol., 2009: 464986-464986. PubMed |
Anderson, A.S. and E.M. Wellington, 2001. The taxonomy of Streptomyces and related genera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 51: 797-814. CrossRef | PubMed |
Kim, S.B., C.N. Seong, S.J. Jeon, K.S. Bae and M. Goodfellow, 2004. Taxonomic study of neutrotolerant acidophilic actinomycetes isolated from soil and description of Streptomyces yeochonensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 54: 211-214. CrossRef |
Jiang, Y., S.K. Tang, J. Wiese, L.H. Xu, J.F. Imhoff and C.L. Jiang, 2007. Streptomyces hainanensis sp. nov., a novel member of the genus Streptomyces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 57: 2694-2698. CrossRef |
Kieser, T., M.J. Bibb, M.G. Buttner, K.F. Chatter and D.A. Hopwood, 2000. Practical Streptomyces Genetics. 2nd Edn., The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, UK
Saitou, N. and M. Nei, 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4: 406-425. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Singh, V., V. Praveen, F. Khan and C.K.M. Tripathi, 2009. Phylogenetics of an antibiotic producing Streptomyces strain isolated from soil. Bioinformation, 4: 53-58. Direct Link |
Dopazo, J., 1994. Estimating errors and confidence intervals for branch lengths in phylogenetic trees by a bootstrap approach. J. Mol. Evol., 38: 300-304. Direct Link |
Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei and S. Kumar, 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24: 1596-1599. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Bosshard, P.P., S. Abels, R. Zbinden, E.C. Bottger and M. Altwegg, 2003. Ribosomal DNA sequencing for identification of aerobic gram-positive rods in the clinical laboratory (an 18-Month Evaluation). J. Clin. Microbiol., 41: 4134-4140. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Chistova, K., Z. Sholeva and V. Chipeva, 1995. Application of molecular biological methods in taxonomy of genus Streptomyces. J. Culture Collection, 1: 3-10. Direct Link |
Hosoya, Y., S. Okamoto, H. Muramatsu and K. Ochi, 1998. Acquisition of certain streptomycin-resistant (str) mutations enhances antibiotic production in bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 42: 2041-2047. Direct Link |
Lai, C., J. Xu, Y. Tozawa, Y. Okamoto-Hosoya, X. Yao and K. Ochi, 2002. Genetic and physiological characterization of rpoB mutations that activate antibiotic production in Streptomyces lividans. Microbiology, 148: 3365-3373. Direct Link |
Lee, Y., J. Young, H.J. Kwon, J.W. Suh, J. Kim, Y. Chong and Y. Lim, 2006. AdoMet derivatives induce the production of actinorhodin in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 16: 965-968. Direct Link |
Liu, R., C. Bin, L. Duan and W. Mingzhn, 2005. Potent in vitro anticancer activity of metacycloprodigision and Undecylprodigiosin from asponge derived actinomycetes Saccaropolyspora sp. PR China Beijing Inst. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 28: 1341-1344.
Onasanya, A., A. Basso, E. Somado, E.R. Gasore and F.E. Nwilene et al., 2010. WITHDRAWN: Development of a combined molecular diagnostic and DNA fingerprinting technique for rice bacteria pathogens in Africa. Biotechnology, 9: 89-105. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Garrity, G., 2010. Bergey`s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Actinobacteria. Vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN-13: 9780387950433
Williams, S.T., M. Goodfellow, G. Alderson, E.M.H. Wellington, P.H.A. Sneath and M.J. Sackin, 1983. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J. Gen. Microbiol., 129: 1743-1813. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Williams, S.T., M. Goodfellow, E.M.H. Wellington, J.C. Vickers and G. Alderson et al., 1983. A probability matrix for identification of some Streptomycetes. J. Gen. Microbiol., 129: 1815-1830. PubMed |
Zolgharnein, H., K. Karami, M.M. Assadi and A.D. Sohrab, 2010. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analyses of heavy metal removal bacteria from the persian gulf. Biotechnology, 9: 1-8. CrossRef | Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |