Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers

H. Awamleh, D. Hassawi, H. Migdadi and M. Brake
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) technique was used to asses the genetic diversity among twelve pomegranate landraces collected from three locations in Jordan. Eight AFLP primer combinations detected a total of 1433 bands with an average of 14.9 bands per landrace. MseI+CTG and EcoRI+ATG primer combinations have the highest ability to discrimination the landraces; they revealed 265 bands with an average of 22.1 band/landrace. The polymorphism that detected by individual primer combinations ranged from 56.7 to 100%. The average genetic similarity ranged from 0.46 to 0.87 among the twelve tested landraces. The highest similarity was recorded between the landraces Qrati and Khdari1, Táeafi and Helow Khashabi. Landrace Zeglabi showed broad diversity comparing to the other landraces. However, all landraces were discriminated with the tested primer combinations. This study has emphasized the ability of AFLP in determining the genetic diversity among pomegranate landraces.

Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

H. Awamleh, D. Hassawi, H. Migdadi and M. Brake, 2009. Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers. Biotechnology, 8: 316-322.

DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2009.316.322



Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) belongs to the family Punicaceae which has a single genus Punica and two species P. protopunica Balf. and P. granatum L. According to   Smith (1976), P. granatum L. has 2n = 2x = 16, 18 chromosomes. Pomegranate thought to be indigenous to the region of Iran where it is native (Stover and Mercure, 2007) and it is also thought to be a native in Turkey (Ercisli et al., 2007); It was spread to the Mediterranean countries at a very early date. Ozgen et al. (2008) mentioned the importance of evaluating and conserving the local genetic materials of pomegranate in the Mediterranean region. Pomegranate is grown commercially in Tunisia, Turkey, Egypt, Spain, Morocco, Iran, Afghanistan, India and to some extent, in the United States (California), China, Japan and Russia (Hayes, 1957; Kumar, 1990). In Jordan, Pomegranate is grown under irrigated and rain fed areas; the total planted area was 3,761 ha with a total production of 4,094 tons, in the average of 6 years (2000-2005).

The genetic diversity among and within genotypes plays a significant role in crops improvement through any breeding program. Genetic diversity at morphological as well as biochemical levels has a limitations due to the influence of environment on the performance of genotypes. Therefore, the genetic materials is considered the main component for studying or comparing between genotypes due to its stability and less affected by environment features. Many techniques have been used for these purposes, for instance; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP).

Amplified fragment length polymorphism is based on the detection of DNA restriction fragments by PCR amplification. Caetano-Anolle’s and Gresshoff (1997) reported that the AFLP technique allows production of very high density DNA marker maps for application in genome research, positional cloning of gene and for application in genetic analysis including cultivar identification and genetic diversity.

Sarkhosh et al. (2006) used one hundred RAPD primers to determine the diversity level among 24 Iranian pomegranate genotypes. Sixteen primers showed reliable polymorphic patterns and the genotypes produced similarities that ranged from 0.29 to 0.89. Other studies indicated that RAPD analysis was useful for revealing genetic diversity and for grouping pomegranate cultivars (Durgac et al., 2008; Zamani et al., 2007; Ercisli et al., 2007).

De la Rosa et al. (2002) used AFLP and RAPD as dominant markers to locate suitable markers in the map of olive. A total of 166 AFLP markers were obtained from 15 different primer combinations. Resta et al. (2002) mentioned that AFLP analysis is an effective tool for the identification of olives cultivars and for the estimation of genetic distance. A selected group of 13 genotypes diffused in Apulia (Southern Italy) were compared using 18 primer combinations; about 792 AFLP loci and 241 polymorphism were found. Jubrael et al. (2005) used AFLP markers to discriminate 18 Iraqi date palm varieties. A total of 122 polymorphic AFLP loci were scored with an average of 17.4 polymorphic loci/primer combinations. They reported that AFLP technique is an efficient method for varietals identification and for estimating genetic relationship in date palm. Amplified fragment length polymorphism was used for comparing date palm varieties with florescence labeled primers. A total of 310 AFLP fragments derived from five primer combinations were yielded. The obtained AFLP markers were successfully used for identifying date palm plants (Diaz et al., 2003). AFLP technique was used to detect polymorphism between California Almond cultivars, which were not distinguishable with other techniques (Boritzki et al., 2000; Arnau et al., 2001).

The genetic identification of genotypes is important for certified plant materials, but requires fast and reliable techniques (Bianchi et al., 2002). Pomegranate has not taken attention in researches and few characterizations and genetic diversity-studies are available; it never been characterized at the molecular level in Jordan. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize some of the pomegranate landraces grown in different locations of Jordan using AFLP markers technique.


This study was conducted during 2006-2008 at the research station of Al- Balqà Applied University.

Plant materials: Leaves of twelve pomegranate landraces were collected from three locations in Jordan that practice cultivation of pomegranate. These locations were Al-Rayan and Arjan in the North of Jordan and Al-Walah in the middle part of Jordan; they belong to the Ministry of Agriculture (Table 1). Fully-grown fresh leaves free of apparent pest and diseases were washed with distilled water, dried and then tightly wrapped in polyethylene film. All the samples were labeled and kept at (-80°C) until using.

Isolation of genomic DNA: Genomic DNA was isolated from the collected leaves using the cetytrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method described by Doyle and Doyle (1987).

Table 1: Names and sites of collection of pomegranate landraces used in the study
Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers

Three gram of frozen leaves were grounded to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and then transferred into (50 mL) polypropylene tube containing (20 mL) of pre-warmed CTAB buffer {(2% w/v) CTAB, (1.4 M) NaCl (sodium chloride), (20 mM) EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), (100 mM) Tris-HCl pH 8.0, (1%) PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidone), (0.2%) β-mercaptoethanol and (0.1%) sodium hydrogen sulfite (NaHSO3)}. The mixture was incubated in a water bath with shaker for 1 h at (65°C). After cooling to room temperature, an equal volume of chloroform-isoamylalcohol (24:1) was added to each sample and kept on a shaker for 10 min. The samples were then centrifuged at (12000 rpm) for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred into new tubes and two volumes of cold absolute ethanol were added to each sample to precipitate the DNA. The tubes were placed at (-20°C) for 15 min to improve DNA precipitation; after that, they centrifuged at (12000 rpm) for 10 min. The supernatant was decanted carefully and the DNA was washed with (70%) ethanol. The tubes were placed on the laboratory bench for over night to ensure complete drying of the pellet. Four hundred microliter of TE buffer {(10 mM) Tris-HCl pH 8.0, (0.1 mM) EDTA} was added to each sample to dissolve the DNA. Five microliter of RNas was added to each sample and kept at (37°C) for 30 min to get rid of RNA. The DNA samples were then kept at (-80°C) until using.

Detection of genomic DNA: Agarose gel (0.7%) electrophoresis was utilized to detect the DNA. The concentration was determined by using the spectrophotometer (Bio Wave, S2100 Diode Array) and the DNA was then diluted to (50 ng μL-1). The quality of DNA was estimated by calculating the ratio of absorbance at (260 and 280 nm) according to Johnson (1994).

Digestion and ligation of DNA: Digestion and ligation of DNA were achieved following the procedure of Vos et al. (1995), which described in AFLP Core Reagent Kit (Invetrogene, life technologies, Cat. Number: 10482-016). The (25 μL) total volume of the digestion mixture for each sample was composed of: (13 μL) deionized sterile water, (5 μL) reaction buffer {(50 mM) Tris-HCl pH 7.5, (50 mM) Mg-acetate and (250 mM) K-acetate}, (2 μL) of EcoRI/ MesI restriction enzymes {(1.25 unit μL-1) of enzyme in (10 mM) Tris-HCl pH 7.4, (50 mM) NaCl, (0.1 mM) EDTA, (1 mM) Dithiothreitol (DDT), (0.1 mg mL-1) BSA, (50%) glycerol (v/v)} and (5 μL) of template DNA. The samples were incubated at (37°C) for 3 h utilizing the thermocycler (MJ-Research, Model PTC 200). The digested samples were collected by brief centrifugation, incubated for 15 min at (70°C) and then placed on ice.

The digested samples were then ligated with corresponding adaptors by adding (25 μL) total volume of ligation mixture that consisted of: (24 μL) of the adapter/ligation solution {(5 pmol μL-1) EcoRI adapters, (50 pmol μL-1) MesI adapters, (0.4 mM) ATP, (10 mM) Tris-HCl pH 7.5, (10 mM) Mg-acetate} and (1 μL) T4 DNA-ligase {(1 unit μL-1) in (10 mM) Tris-HCl pH 7.5, (1 mM) DTT, (50 mM) KCl, (50%) glycerol (v/v)}. The samples were placed into the thermocycler at (20°C) for 2 h. After ligation step, the samples were diluted tenfold with TE buffer {(10 mM) Tris-HCl pH 8.0, (0.1 mM) EDTA} to be used in the preamplification step.

AFLP procedure: The preamplification reaction was performed with two oligonucleotide primers, one corresponding to the EcoRI-ends and the other corresponding to the MseI-ends. One microliter of the ligated DNA was mixed with (9 μL) of preamplification mixture {(6.26 μL) deionized sterile water, (1 μL) of (10X) polymerase buffer that consist of [(100 mM) Tris-HCl pH 8.0, (15 mM) MgCl2, (500 mM) KCl and (0.1%) difco gelatin], (1 μL) of (2 mM) dNTPs, (0.3 μL) of (100 μM) of each primer (EcoRI+A and MseI+C) and (0.14 μL) of (1unit) ampliTaq polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA)]. The PCR reaction was set as follow: (94°C) for 5 min followed by 21 cycles of 30 sec at (94°C), 40 sec at (56°C) and 1 min at (72°C). The final extension was 5 min at (72°C). After the preamplification step, samples were diluted tenfold with sterile deionized water to be used in selective amplification.

Selective amplification was achieved using primers possess three nucleotides at their 3’ end. Eight primer combinations (Table 2) were used in the analyses. The selective amplification mixture was composed of (2.28 μL) sterile deionized water, (1 μL) of (10X) polymerase buffer, (1 μL) of (2 mM) dNTPs, (0.4 μL) 0f (100 μM) of each primer (EcoRI + 3 nucleotides and MesI + 3 nucleotides), (0.2 μL) of (15 mM) MgCl2 and (0.22 μL) of (1unit) ampliTaq polymerase. Then, (3.5 μL) of the preamplifier templates DNA was added to each mixture. The AFLP selective amplification was carried out with the following cycle profile: cycle (1): 30 sec at (94°C), 30 sec at (68°C) and 60 sec at (72°C). Cycle (2-13): same PCR profiles as cycle one except for a sequential decreasing of the annealing temperature in each subsequent cycle by (0.7°C). Cycle (14-35): 30 sec at (94°C), 30 sec at (59°C), 60 sec at (72°C) and then 5 min at (72°C) for final extension. After that, the samples were kept at (-20°C) until using.

Acrylamide gel electrophoresis: Apelex sequencing unit (Vertical electrophoresis, Apelex, MT 1002, France) was used for gel generation. The short plate was treated with the binding solution {(3 μL) of bind silane (Promega, Madison, USA) mixed with (1 mL) of absolute ethanol and (0.5%) glacial acetic acid}. The long plate was cleaned and the surface was treated with the silicon grease (Loxeal engineering adhesives grasso silicone, Italy). The gel solution {(16 mL) of acrylamide/bisacrylamide 19:1 solution (Promega, Madison, USA), (16 mL) of (5X) TBE buffer [(0.1 M) Tris-base, (0.1 M) Boric acid, (2 mM) EDTA)], (33.6 g) of Urea (Promega, Madison, USA) were mixed, warmed, filtered and then the volume of the mixture was completed to (70 mL) by using sterile deionized water} was mixed with (48 μL) of Tetra Ethyl Methyl Ethylene Diamine (TEMED) and (480 μL) of Ammonium per Sulfate (APS).

Table 2: Sequence of AFLP primer combinations used in this study
Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers
*The selective EcoRI primer with three selective nucleotides, 3 ’ extra nucleotide ATG / ATT / AAT / ACA / ACC / ACT / AGA / AGG. *The selective MseI primer with three selective nucleotides, 3 ’ extra nucleotide CTG / CTT / CAT / CCA / CCC / CCT / CGA / CGG

The solution was then poured on the vertical plates. After 1.30 h, the gel plates stand on the sequencing units and pre-heated for 30 min using Apelex power supply (800 V).

Samples loading and gel silver staining: Each of the selective amplification samples was mixed with (4 μL) of formamide dye {(98%) formamide, (10 mM) EDTA pH 8.0 and bromo phenol blue and xylene cyanol as tracking dyes}. The samples were then heated for 3 min at (94°C) and directly inserted in ice. Four microliter from each sample was loaded into the comb-teeth wells and run at constant current (800 V) in (1X) TBE buffer for 3.5 h. After electrophoresis was completed, the two plates were separated from each other and the long plate was prepared for staining.

The gel was fixed with 1 L of (10%) glacial acetic acid and agitated well for 20 min and then washed three times with tap water. The gel was transferred to a tray filled with 2 L of silver staining solution {(2 g) of silver nitrate and (3 mL) of (37%) formaldehyde dissolved in 2 L of double distilled water} and kept with agitation for 30 min. Then, the gel was washed with distilled water and set in a tray field with 1 liter of the developing solution {(30 g) of sodium carbonate, (1.5 mL) of (37%) formaldehyde, (200 μL) sodium thiosulfate mixed with 1 L of double distilled water} until the first band was appeared. The developing solution was changed once and the gel was set in it until all bands became visualized. Then, (500 mL) of fix-stop solution was added to the developing solution and kept for 3 min. After that, the gel was washed with tape water and kept on the refrigerator until got dry. Gel was visually scored from the photo taken by a scanner with high resolution.

Data analysis: For each primer combination, the number of polymorphic and monomorphic bands was determined. The bands were analyzed using Nei similarity index (Nei and Li, 1979), which excludes common negative data. Bands were scored as (1) for present and (0) for absent and entered into a data matrix. Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA) cluster analysis was used to identify genetic variation patterns among the landraces using the NTSYSpc program version 2.1 by Rohlf, 2000 (Exeter, Software, New York). The similarity equation was as follow:

Similarity = 2Nab/(Na +Nb)
Nab = No. of scored amplification fragments with the same molecular weight shared between landraces a and b
Na = No. of scored amplified fragments in landrace a
Nb = No. of scored amplification fragments in landrace

The markers size for each gel was estimated according to standard curves and regression equations that constructed based on the migration distance (mm) of the (50 bp) step DNA ladder and the log size of the DNA markers.


Genomic DNA that was isolated from pomegranate landraces revealed high quantity and quality. The DNA was detected by (0.7%) agarose gel electrophoresis. The concentrations of DNA samples ranged from 225 to 525 ng μL-1. Amplified fragment length polymorphism bands and markers produced by the eight primer combinations with the three selective nucleotides and their distributions across the landraces are presented in Table 3. The total number of bands scored for the eight primer combinations were 1433. The primer combinations (MseI+CTG/ EcoRI +ATG) showed highest number (265) of bands and the primer combinations (MseI+CCC/EcoRI+ACC) showed the lowest number (102) of bands. The primer combinations MseI+CAT/ EcoRI+AAT and the primer combinations MseI+CGA/ EcoRI+AGA gave the highest percentage of polymorphism (100%), while the lowest percentage of polymorphism (56.7%) was obtained from the primer combinations MseI+CTT/EcoRI+ATT. The eight primer combinations also generated a total of 257 markers; 235 of them were polymorphic which accounted 91.4% and the remaining 8.6 % were monomorphic. As an example, AFLP banding pattern for the primer combinations MseI+CTG and EcoRI+ATG is shown in Fig. 1.

Table 3: Primer combinations, total number of markers, number of polymorphic markers, polymorphic percent, total number of bands and average number of markers/landrace that produced by eight primer combinations used in this study
Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers
1Total No. of differently sized AFLP markers amplified across all 12 landraces. 2No. of AFLP markers found to be polymorphic across all 12 landraces. 3Total No. of AFLP bands scored for all 12 landraces. 4Average No. of AFLP markers scored per landrace

Table 4: Similarity coefficient values for pairwise comparison of 12 pomegranate landraces based on eight primer combinations
Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers

Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers
Fig. 1: Amplified fragment length polymorphism pattern of 12 pomegranate landraces obtained from silver-stained polyacrylamide gel for the primer combinations MseI+CTG and EcoRI+ATG. M (bp): 50 bp step DNA ladder. N. control: Negative control. P. control: Positive control

The similarity coefficients values between all possible pairs of landraces ranged from 0.46 to 0.87 (Table 4). The dendrograme constructed by UPGMA cluster analysis (Fig. 2) revealed two main clusters.

Image for - Molecular Characterization of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Landraces Grown in Jordan using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Markers

Fig. 2:

Dendrogram of 12 pomegranate landraces generated by UPGMA cluster analysis of the similarity values on the basis of eight primer combinations

The first one consisted of two landraces Khdari 2 and Hamedi. The second cluster was subdivided into three sub-clusters. In the first sub cluster, landrace Zeglabi was grouped with the other nine landraces. In the second sub cluster, landrace Balanawa was grouped the other remaining eight landraces. In the third sub cluster, landrace Sharabi was grouped with sub-clusters included the other seven landraces; in which landraces Qrati and Khdari1 grouped together with similarity equal to 85%, landraces Táeafi and Helow Khashabi grouped together with similarity equal to 87% and were in turn grouped with landrace Slehi. The landrace Emlasi was grouped with sub-groups included (Slehi, Helow Khashabi, Táeafi, Khdari 1, Qrati and Sharabi).


The success of any genetic conservation or breeding program is depending on understanding the amount and distribution of the genetic variation presented in the genetic pool. Morphological traits were used to describe such genetic variation in pomegranate varieties. These traits are mainly related to the fruit and morphology characteristic and are complex and greatly influenced by environmental factures (Sarkhosh et al., 2006). Identification and characterization of varieties based on these morphological traits alone are difficult; the use of other biochemical and molecular markers could supply complementary useful information (Mars and Marrakchi, 1999).

In this study, eight primer combinations were used to characterize pomegranate at molecular level. The number of reproducible polymorphic markers for these primer combinations ranged from 6 markers (landrace Qrati with primer combination MseI+CCC/EcoRI+ACC) to twenty eight markers (landrace Helow Khshabi with primer combination MseI+CTG/EcoRI+ATG). The markers size ranged from 47 bp for primer combinations MseI+CAT/ EcoRI+AAT with all landraces except landraces Qrati and Helow Tari to 450 bp for primer combination MseI+CTG/ EcoRI+ATG with all landraces except Khdari 2 and Hamadi. The large number of polymorphic markers produced with the eight primer combinations indicated that pomegranate landraces are highly polymorphic and this agree with the findings of Sarkhosh et al. (2006), who mentioned that polymorphism detection efficiency among pomegranate varieties by RAPD technique was very high (90.96%).

The PCR amplification products allowed to distinguish each landrace and to study the genetic relationship among them. The amplification products obtained with the eight primer combinations were analyzed to compare the genetic relationships between landraces. Primer combinations MseI+CAT/EcoRI+AAT and MseI+CGA/EcoRI+AGA produced 100% polymorphic markers. These two primer combinations are recommended to be used for the identification of pomegranate landraces with less time and cost.

The similarity values ranged from 0.46 to 0.87 among landraces. High similarity was recorded between landraces Helow Khashabi and Ta’eafi. Regarding the cluster analysis, AFLP technique reliably distinguished all the twelve pomegranate landraces and showed that some of them have less genetic differences like (Qrati and Khdari 1) and (Táeafi and Hellow Khashabi) which indicated that these landraces may have similar genetic makeup. The analysis also showed that there was broad genetic diversity among landraces Khdari 2, Zeglabi, Bala-nawa and Hello Tari; these landraces produced the highest numbers of unique markers with the primer combinations 7, 6, 4, 4, respectively.

The results revealed that AFLP technique is one of the most powerful tools for evaluating genetic diversity among pomegranate landraces and this agree with other reports which mentioned that AFLP has been showed to be useful for studying genetic variation in many fruit trees such as date palm (Cao and Chao, 2002; Devanand and Chao, 2003; Jubrael et al., 2005), olives (Resta et al., 2002; De la Rosa et al., 2002) and other cultivars (Boritzki, 2000; Arnau et al., 2001). The results of this study also revealed that the diversity of the pomegranate displayed by the twelve landraces could be attributed to genetic causes.

In conclusion, the high percentage of polymorphic markers obtained from the primer combinations indicated that pomegranate is highly polymorphic fruit tree. Some landraces showed wide divergence and their favorable characters should be taken into consideration in future breeding programs. The results of this study support the need of establishing a gene bank for pomegranate to conserve the local landraces and to develop different projects to investigate the possibility of reserving these landraces in vitro. Amplified fragment length polymorphism markers can be used for pomegranate fingerprinting and for determining genetic relation among landraces grown in Jordan. Further researches are needed to study the morphological and agronomic traits of pomegranate landraces to support the findings of the present study.


The authors are expressing their appreciations to Al-Balqà Applied University and to the National Center for Agricultural Research and Extension (NCARE) for facilitating and supporting this research.


1:  Arnau, G., J. Lallemand and M. Bourgoin, 2001. Are AFLP markers the best alternative for cultivar identification? ISHS Acta Hort., 546: 301-306.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Bianchi, V.J., S. Venturi, J.C. Fachinello, S. Tartarini and S. Sansavini, 2002. Molecular AFLP and SSR markers for genetic identification of plum cultivars (Amplified fragment length polymorphism–single sequence repeats Prunus domestica L. Prunus salicina Lindl. Prunus cerasifera Ehrb.). Riv. Frutticoltura, 64: 83-87.

3:  Boritzki, M., L. Plieske and D. Struss, 2000. Cultivar identification in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) using AFLP and microsatallite markers. ISHS Acta Hort., 538: 505-510.
Direct Link  |  

4:  Cao, B.R. and C.T. Chao, 2002. Identification of date palm cultivars in California using AFLP markers. HortScience, 37: 966-968.
Direct Link  |  

5:  De la Rosa, R., A. Martin, L. Rallo, A. Angiolillo, C. Guerrero and L. Baldoni, 2002. RAPD and AFLP analysis for olive mapping. Acta Hort., 586: 79-82.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Devanand, P.S. and C. Chao, 2003. Genetic variation within Majdool and Deglet Noor date (Phoenix dactylefra L) cultivars in California detected by florescent AFLP markers. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol., 78: 405-409.

7:  Diaz, S., C. Pire, J. Ferrer and M. Bonete, 2003. Identification of Phoenix dactylefra L. varieties based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 8: 891-899.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Doyle, J.J. and J.L. Doyle, 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull., 19: 11-15.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Durgac, C., M. Ozgen, O. Simsek, Y.A. Kacar, Y. Kıyga, S. Celebi1, K. Gunduz1 and S. Serce, 2008. Molecular and pomological diversity among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 1294-1301.
Direct Link  |  

10:  Ercisli, S., G. Agar, E. Orhan, A. Yildirim and Y. Hizarci, 2007. Interspecific variability of RAPD and fatty acid composition of some pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L) growing in Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 35: 764-769.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Hayes, W.B., 1957. Fruit Growing in India. 3rd Edn., Vanguard Press, Allahabad, India

12:  Johnson, J.L., 1994. Similarity Analysis of DNAs. In: Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, Gerhardt, P., R.G. Murray, W.A. Wood and N.R. Krieg (Eds.). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 655-681

13:  Jubrael, J.M.S., S.M. Udupa and M. Baum, 2005. Assessment of AFLP-based genetic relationships among date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties of Iraq. J. Am. Soc. Hort., 130: 442-447.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Kumar, G.N.M., 1990. Pomegranate. In: Fruits of Tropical and Subtropical Origin, Nagy, S., P.E. Shaw and W.F. Wardowski (Eds.). Florida Science Source, Inc., USA., pp: 328 -347

15:  Mars, M. and M. Marrakchi, 1999. Diversity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) germplasm in Tunisia. Genet. Res. Crop Evol., 46: 461-467.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Nei, M. and W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 76: 5269-5273.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Ozgen, M., C. Drugac, S. Serce and C. Kaya, 2008. Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegranate cultivars grown in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Chem., 111: 703-706.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Resta, P., C. Lotti and G. Fanizza, 2002. Use of AFLP to characterize apulian olive varieties (O. Europaea L.). Acta Hort., 586: 73-78.
Direct Link  |  

19:  Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System-User's Manual. Version 2.1, Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York

20:  Sarkhosh, A., Z. Zamani, R. Fatahi and A. Ebadi, 2006. RAPD markers reveal polymorphism among some Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) landraces. Sci. Horticult., 111: 24-29.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Smith, P.M., 1976. Minor Crops. In: Evolution of Crop Plants, Simmonds, N.W. (Ed.). Longman, New York, USA

22:  Stover, E. and E.W. Mercure, 2007. The pomegranate: A new look at the fruit of paradise. HortScience, 42: 1088-1092.
Direct Link  |  

23:  Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans and T. van de Lee et al., 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4407-4414.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Zamani, Z., A. Sarkhosh, R. Fatahi and A. Ebadi, 2007. Genetic relationships among pomegranate genotypes studied by fruit characteristics and RAPD markers. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol., 82: 11-18.
Direct Link  |  

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved